Saturday, 24 September 2022

Emergency Saturday Broadcast! Are You Ready For Nuclear War?

Global military mobilization and a rigged judicial system signal the final stages of the Great Reset as the Vatican recalls its wealth and China faces internal collapse.

By The Alex Jones Show | 3h 1m listen | 40 chapters
Emergency Saturday Broadcast! Are You Ready For Nuclear War? cover

About this episode

Vladimir Putin has mobilized 300,000 Russian troops and positioned heavy bombers near the Ukrainian border, explicitly stating that his nuclear warnings are not a bluff. As Poland begins distributing iodine pills and NATO's proxy war escalates, analysts suggest a 50% probability of tactical nuclear use in the coming months. Alex Jones frames this transmission as a final resistance effort against an impending global cataclysm and the implementation of the Great Reset.

The Vatican has ordered all global funds to be returned to the Holy See by September 30, coinciding with the end of the Shemitah year and rumors of a palace coup against Xi Jinping in China. In the United States, constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes joins the program to analyze the Connecticut damages trial, which he labels a Soviet-style show trial designed to strip the First Amendment rights of political dissidents. Barnes highlights the absurdity of the proceedings where Judge Barbara Bellis has barred Jones from mentioning the Constitution or his compliance with discovery. Meanwhile, financial experts Carl Icahn and Stanley Druckenmiller predict a massive market collapse as BlackRock continues to vacuum up single-family homes to create a permanent renter society.

Amidst the legal and geopolitical chaos, Alex Jones visits a Connecticut apple orchard to advocate for the agrarian values of Thomas Jefferson as the only antidote to the synthetic foods and GMOs of the New World Order. The broadcast features a dramatic montage of the Paul Harvey If I Were the Devil monologue, illustrating the perceived subversion of the American family. Robert Barnes also provides updates on the Brooke Jackson whistleblower suit against Pfizer and the collapse of the DOJ investigation into Representative Matt Gaetz.


CHAPTER 01 / 40 Discussion

InfoWars Global Conflict and DEFCON Alert Introduction

InfoWars broadcasts a dramatic montage featuring NORAD DEFCON alerts and references to global thermonuclear war. The sequence includes clips of Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and various military scenarios involving Typhoon class submarines and Alaskan air defense zones. Alex Jones frames the transmission as a resistance effort against an impending global cataclysm.

infowars· alex jones· defcon· world war iii· norad· nuclear war

00:00 InfoWars. Tomorrow's news today. Zack, this is Crystal Palace. Inc. NORAD has declared DEFCON 3. Scramble all alert aircraft. I repeat, scramble all alert aircraft. The Whopper spends all its time thinking about World War III. Target selection complete. Time on target sequence complete. 22 Typhoon class submarines departing Petropavlovsk, turning southbound at Nordkapp, bearing 095 degrees. Radar reports two unknown tracks are penetrating the Alaskan air defense zone. From the front lines of the information war... Flush the bombers, get the subs in launch mode. We are at DEFCON 1.

01:01 Are you prepared to destroy the enemy? You bet! Defending the republic from enemies foreign and domestic. We'll keep control but we'll keep it here at the top where it belongs. 3, 2, 1, impact. Shall we play a game? How about global thermonuclear? Live from the InfoWars.com studios, it's Alex Jones. All units confirm weapons targeted and ready. Awaiting launch codes. We are on a launch mode. Do you really believe that the enemy would attack without provocation? If you are receiving this transmission, you are the resistance. We're in.

01:45 Russians are still denying everything, sir. We have a Soviet submarine launch detection. I wish I didn't know about any of this. I wish I was like everybody else. Strange end. The only winning move is not to let... The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There's about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so. As president, I will make it clear.

02:29 that the United States will treat cyber attacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic and military responses. They're voting for peace on planet Earth if they vote for Trump. But if they vote for Hillary, it's war. We came, we saw, he died. With her, you'll end up in World War III. I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran. Right now, Senator, for us to control all of the airspace in Syria would require us to go to war against Syria and Russia.

03:07 The US military has just raised the threat level to DEFCON 2. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton is still threatening Russia with military action following unconfirmed reports of further hacking. It's like she's not even concerned about the repercussions. Of course not because she's... Hang on guys, look, there's a really loud noise. Alright, looks like we're having a little bit of technical difficulties. We'll try to get Leanne back on in a few minutes. When the president gives the order, it must be followed. I'm going to go ahead and get my stuff.

CHAPTER 02 / 40 Discussion

Alex Jones Connecticut Show Trial and Nuclear War Anxiety

Alex Jones reports on his return from the Connecticut show trial, expressing extreme concern that escalating tensions in Ukraine will lead to nuclear war. He states he is considering not returning to testify because he fears being separated from his family during a global collapse. Jones describes the current geopolitical climate as the implementation of the New World Order and the Great Reset.

alex jones· connecticut· show trial· sandy hook· nuclear war· great reset

04:24 I just got back last night from Connecticut in the show trial, and I've been following the news globally of war escalating to incredibly dangerous levels in Ukraine. And I'm strongly considering not even going back to testify on my own behalf in our part of the trial, the show trial, because I'm that concerned I could get stuck there without my family when nuclear war breaks up. That's why I took my wife and my youngest daughter with me the other day. Children are grown up or almost out of school, two are out, one is still in high school, and they've got my parents and family here. I mean, it's that serious, okay? And I've never acted like that, I've never behaved like that. I seriously may not even be able to go to Connecticut and defend myself because it doesn't matter. We're going into a global depression, the borders are collapsing, people are dying by the millions from the poison shots. We are inside the new world order, ladies and gentlemen.

05:20 We are absolutely inside the global takeover, the Great Reset. It's all here, it's all happening just like they said they would do and I've been warning for decades. And all I can offer you is the truth, like Churchill did when the Nazis drove the British forces out of France into the sea at Dunkirk. He said, all I'm offering you is blood, sweat, and tears, and pain, but the alternative is total slavery and death. And it's a long, hard fight, and people can decide to roll over and submit to the New World Order and let the planet be depopulated. Or we can have a mass awakening that transcends left and right, and it's all about good and evil and we say no. But this spaceship, this rock hurtling through space, this globe, our home, is under the greatest threat it's ever been in the history of mankind. It's all starting in Russia on its border with Ukraine. That is the reality of this planet spinning through space and what we face. I'm going to try to calmly go through this all today for the next three hours.

06:23 on this live emergency transmission. We can put the full show headline up please in a few minutes to let you know what we're dealing with. Saturday, September 24th, emergency broadcast, Russia mobilizes for nuclear war, watch live. And the way you trigger the public to peacefully protest and to flood the streets with candlelight vigils that transcend party is by taking this live show feed right now and sharing it on mainstream platforms like Twitter and Instagram and Facebook and on Getter and independent groups like Gab and everywhere else because you are the info warriors and without you, ladies and gentlemen, we are not going to be able to stop this. We have a good chance of stopping this, but even mainline analysts predict a 50% chance of a tactical nuclear war in the next few months in Europe. That will cause a global depression, incredible problems. It'll be nightmare beyond imagination. And mainline analysts, and I agree with them, give it about a 20% chance of a full-on nuclear war. So I have a lot of trouble

07:27 focusing on all the side issues while this is going on. There is a major normalcy bias that goes on in everybody, including myself, where you live in an open, somewhat free society, and you just expect the lights are going to turn on, you expect the grocery stores to be full of food, you expect there's going to be gas for your car, you expect that hydrogen bombs and missiles aren't going to rain down on you and kill you and your family. But every ancient civilization became corrupt and decadent and collapsed. But now, when our civilization collapses, which they've accelerated the cycle through the Great Reset and Build Back Better, you're going to have hundreds and hundreds of nuclear reactors that melt down. You're going to have billions of people starving to death that will then be like zombie apocalypse as they try to feed themselves. Within just 15 days, almost everybody reverts to cannibalism. If I was a selfish man, I would be in the middle of nowhere in a cabin on the backside of a hill 100 miles from any town with a bomb shelter right now.

08:42 If I just cared about myself and just cared about my children, I would be gone right now. But I'm staying at the helm of the ship. And I don't say this to be dramatic. I don't say, oh, I'm some hero. No, no, no, no. We've got a chance of stopping this. And I'm not running from it. But I'm telling you, deep down, I told you this months ago, you can see it now. I know you feel it as well. Spiritually, intellectually, you can see it. Culturally, you can see it. Historically, you know it. That people better take this more serious than anything they've ever taken in their lives. It's that real. You better kiss your children, you better hug them, you better hug your mom, your dad, your brother, your sister, your mom. You better get right with God. And I'm telling myself that when I point my finger at you, three more pointing back at me. But we're coming under judgment, ladies and gentlemen. Now, before I hit all the serious documented news, for a couple weeks, I've been sent countless texts and seen countless videos talking about the 24th of September, 2022.

CHAPTER 03 / 40 Discussion

September 24th Significance and Russian Military Mobilization

Vladimir Putin has mobilized 300,000 Russian troops and positioned heavy bombers near the Ukrainian border, explicitly stating he is not bluffing about using nuclear weapons. While addressing public rumors regarding the date of September 24, 2022, the discussion focuses on the reality of NATO's proxy war and the high probability of tactical nuclear escalation. Analysts suggest a 50% chance of tactical nuclear use in the coming months.

vladimir putin· nato· ukraine· mobilization· september 24· tactical nuclear war

09:46 and how all these historic things historically have happened on this date, and how it ties into the Jewish calendar and mysticism and the rest of it. I'm not putting any stock in that, but every time the world's on the verge of a cataclysm, the general public will pick a date and decide it's that date that's causing it. It's not that date that's causing it, it's the place and point in time we're in right now. But regardless, it's something that, if it gets the public's attention to be concerned, that's wonderful. But the stock market's already plunged last week, the inflation's exploding, Russia has called up 300,000 troops and put high-tech military weapons on the border with Ukraine, including heavy bombers. Putin has said that I'm not bluffing, I'll use nuclear weapons against NATO, who's using weapons against us. I mean, this is happening. Words cannot describe how incredibly out of control and serious this is. So this isn't about whether you're on the Russian side.

10:49 or the NATO side, the Ukrainian side, or the American side. This is about globalists that lit the fuse with the pandemic and the lockdowns and the imploding borders and sending in troops to overthrow the pro-Russia elected government eight years ago and Soros bragging about it on Farid Zakaria on CNN. They started this, and Russia took the bait and went in there, and I said it was a trap. I told you in October last year, by late February I expected a Russian invasion, because that's all the pieces I saw on the intel I had. When everybody else was saying Russia wasn't going to invade, when Russia was saying it wasn't going to invade, I was saying no, they're going to invade. And this time, the State Department's telling the truth, because they know, because they've lured Russia into this.

11:40 And that's who I really blame at the end of the day. And I don't like what Putin's done either. And as Putin gets more cornered, and as Putin gets under more heat, and as it at home, the hardliners and the mainline Russian population wants total war, he knows he'll be removed. if he doesn't escalate. And so the more the West doubles down, the more he doubles down, and there's not much more room for doubling down. As we move towards tactical nuclear war, which almost every analyst agrees, if the tactical nuclear war happens, then the full on one will happen. And the Pentagon's like, well, we're warning Russia against using nuclear weapons, but we'll probably contain it. We'll nuke them back, but it'll just be in that area. It's not just going to be in that area.

12:25 Just the way this proxy war has escalated to the edge of nuclear war, if there's tactical nuclear war, I believe there'll be a full-on nuclear war. So you know where tomorrow's news today, and I don't want to be proven right about this, and I'm not saying we're gonna have nuclear war. It's like saying to an alcoholic, if you keep drinking two bottles of Jack Daniels a day, you'll probably get liver failure. And you go to the doctor and they tell you, hey, you got fatty liver, and you need to stop, you need to go to rehab, or it's gonna kill you. Now is it going to kill you in a month or a year or five years? You don't know that. You don't know. But drinking two bottles of Jack Daniels a day or two bottles of whatever it is, is not a good idea. And if you're using the liver failure analogy, what's going on in Russia is 10 bottles of Jack Daniels a year, a day, excuse me.

CHAPTER 05 / 40 Discussion

Shemitah Calendar, Vatican Funds, and Globalist Migration

The Vatican has ordered all global funds to be returned to the Holy See by September 30, coinciding with the end of the Shemitah year on the Jewish calendar. Reports indicate that globalist elites, including the founders of Google, are moving to the Southern Hemisphere and the South Pacific in anticipation of northern instability. Additionally, hundreds of major concerts and events have been canceled for the remainder of 2022.

shemitah· vatican· pope· google· southern hemisphere· stock market

18:14 People always focus on some nebulous number or astrology instead of real meat and potatoes, mobilize Russian troops, openly threatening nuclear war, saying I'm not bluffing with one of the largest nuclear arsenals, probably the second largest, maybe the largest on earth, Vladimir Putin. I mean, that's a real leader. By leader, I mean that's a real country. That's a real nuclear arsenal. That's a real threat. It's like Klaus Schwab, The New World Order is real. It's a real thing. people still focus on the esoteric. But and then when bad stuff happens, oh look the stock market crashed four days after. It probably will this week a lot of experts believe even further already crashed last week but they think real crash next week. Oh see it's real because a bunch of people made a big thing about a date. No it was the overthrow of the

19:13 elected government eight years ago in Ukraine and putting weapons on the Russian border and NATO moving heavy weapons in, that's what caused this. Not crystal balls, not Ouija boards, not tarot decks. And I'm not attacking people that are into all this, but the mystical is your Holy Spirit connection to God and discernment. It's not all the Q stuff. It's not all the, oh, let's go to Dealy Plaza and JFK Jr. is going to meet us there. I mean, no, no, no, no. And then people focus on that instead of the real issues. Here's a short clip and the guy makes some good points, and it's open for discussion, but it's not the heart of the matter. Major event on Jewish year. Here it is. Every seven years on the exact end day of the Shemitah, which is the exact end day of basically the Jewish year every seven years, there's usually a major market collapse, and it's actually usually on the exact day.

20:20 This is a Shemitah year and it actually ends on September 26th, which is a Monday. So I've definitely said to keep your eyes on that date. But here's... when I saw this, I was like, what? It's a German politician. This 24th of September 2022 will remain in our memory as a day that we will later say, I still remember where I was. And even more interesting, on top of the German politicians saying September 24th is going to be like a day that everyone on earth will remember, the Vatican has told all of its people that whatever funds they have across the world to send them all back to the Vatican by September 30th, which is like four days after the end of the Shemitah. And of course, when they tell people this,

21:24 You know, you don't just wire billions of dollars on like September 29th when the Pope told you to have it back there by the 30th, right? You probably do it a few days before. And they probably mentioned that to them. So the Vatican seems to know something's going on. So something like these birds flying by, blackbirds, black clouds, something ominous seems to be on the horizon. And then he adds something silly at the end of it. So all those things are real. Vatican saying send back the money, all that, and then they just put a date on it as if that's what caused it. No, the war, the Great Reset, the collapsing borders, all these major governments are calling their money back in. We reported on this a couple weeks ago that thousands of major concerts, hundreds of the biggest in country music, hip-hop, rock and roll have all canceled the next four months.

22:18 around the country and around the world. But how about globalist elites, or even in the news, moving to the Southern Hemisphere? I've had meetings with some of them off-record about the whole Russia situation. I told you this months ago. They've been moving and looking to move everything to the Southern Hemisphere. Most of the Google founders are now hiding out in the South Pacific. That's all real stuff, not the shmeeka. And I'm not pooh-poohing that globalists don't do things on weird dates, and there aren't people that are into the occult and mysticism. All I'm saying is, this is front and center.

CHAPTER 06 / 40 Discussion

International Headlines and Ted Cruz Criticism

Donald Trump warns that the Biden administration's policies could trigger World War III as Poland begins distributing iodine pills due to nuclear plant meltdown fears. Senator Ted Cruz is criticized for allegedly supporting Big Tech immunity and the escalation of the war in Ukraine, with the host labeling him a Goldman Sachs operative. The segment emphasizes that the New World Order is attacking human infrastructure globally.

ted cruz· bill gates· klaus schwab· poland· iodine pills· world war iii

22:55 the Russian mobilization, Russia threatening nuclear war, Putin saying I'm not bluffing. That's a real thing. And you don't stop it by obsessing on a date. You stop it by getting involved and by saying no. Because God gives us free will to decide the outcome. We are given free will. New nuclear threats raise risk of cornered Putin. ABC News. US has privately warned Russia against using nuclear weapons in Ukraine for several months. Uh, yeah, CNN. Germany joins Poland and Baltics in push for harsher Russian sanctions. Yeah, that'll make things better. Only hurts Europe more. Americans in Russia-Ukraine prisoner swap. Wonder if death was near. Missile strikes in Ukraine's cities as call-up causes chaos in Russia. Putin's draft draws resistance in Russia, far-flung regions.

23:54 Donald Trump says stupid Biden administration could trigger World War III. Absolutely, that's what he threatened. I mean, Trump warned they would do. Poland begins handing out ionine pills on fresh fears of Ukraine nuclear plant meltdown. Putin's mobilization of 300,000. It says thousands. More troops unlikely to resolve basic problems in Ukraine. NBC News. And it just goes on and on and on. with what's happening in Russia. Now tomorrow on the Sunday show I think I'm going to go ahead and host all four hours. We have Dr. Judy Mikovits with all the big developments with the COVID narrative collapsing and the new numbers coming out in studio with us. She did a great job with Owen who also did a great job on Friday and I'm going to take your calls tomorrow on this subject but she'll be on this one hour but I'm gonna go ahead and just host all four hours because I've been gone and I want to be on air. Such an important time

24:57 And again, I've been on a razor's edge not even defending any of this Sandy Hook stuff because it's all rigged anyways and it's not going to matter. I mean, folks, the globalists are making their move and only being aware that they're the ones dissolving the borders, devaluing the currency, cutting off the pipelines, destroying the energy infrastructure, launching all these Armageddon operations, launching the GMO, launching the 5G, launching the deadly COVID, launching the deadly vaccine response to it. But we got to really get there the enemy. We got to really get there out to get us. The country's under siege and they're attacking every other country. They're attacking the human infrastructure and everybody. I don't care if you're gay, straight, old, young, black, white, liberal, conservative. We all get roped into fighting with each other, but you're delusional if you think Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates and the New Old Order love you. And they completely run the Democratic Party and most of the Republican Party. Ted Cruz has come out and supported big tech merging with big media and having total immunity.

25:57 It's a horrible person. Right here at the end of the line, folks, he supports World War III, by the way, in Ukraine. He really now unclogs and shows you the horrible person he always was. I tried to hope that he was an opportunist and went against Trump and all that because he just wanted power, but I hope that, you know, in the end, he care about his family, but he doesn't care. He is a Goldman Sachs operative who is as bad as they get, just like Crenshaw and just like the rest of the scum. Shame on him. Shame on him. He's worse than Beto O'Rourke. Because Beto at least tells you what he's going to do so you can stand against him. He doesn't knife you in the back like a wolf in sheep's clothing. So this is a crippling economic attack. Now, I've got a lot of really other important news that ties into all this I want to cover after we play a special report here in a moment. Robert Barnes joins us in about 33 minutes from now. This is a special Saturday emergency commercial free show. And I say that, we're not running the regular breaks for our radio and TV stations.

CHAPTER 07 / 40 Discussion

InfoWars Bankruptcy Status and Shipping Logistics Update

Free Speech Systems has entered Chapter 5 bankruptcy reorganization to remain operational and counter claims of excessive wealth made during Texas court proceedings. Judge Lopez in Texas recently removed the Chief Restructuring Officer (CRO) due to transparency issues regarding previous filings. Despite these legal hurdles, the InfoWars warehouse is fully stocked and has resolved a three-week shipping backlog caused by court-mandated budget restrictions.

infowars· free speech systems· chapter 5 bankruptcy· judge lopez· shipping· warehouse

27:10 We're going to just air news reports and things here when we do go to break, while we get guests on and things like that. They're very, very important. But I will just throw this out there. And look, as things are so bad now, I get it. I understand. But we need to push to stop the new world order. We need to try to stay on air. InfoWars is again on the verge of insolvency. God just keeps it that way where we are treading water right now. And I want to keep strong and stay on air with our whole crew and all our shows. And I don't want to implode and let the enemy win. We have our most important missions ever to carry out. I want to thank those of you that purchased the products. I want to thank those of you that supported us. People think bankruptcy means you're closing your doors. There's dozens of different types of bankruptcies. We're not closing our doors. They're trying to close our doors.

27:54 So I went into bankruptcy to prove in these courts that I don't have all this extra money to go under that scrutiny. And a lot of people see that and they go, oh, you're closing your doors. No, chapter five is emergency reorganization, where you show you're having trouble paying your bills, but then you go into reorganization where it sets the benchmark for how much money you actually have so we can stay on air, continue to operate, and also show to the state courts, everybody else, when they claim I have $400 million like they falsely did in the Texas show trial four weeks ago, we can show certified all the stuff that is just a lie. And then that allows InfoWars free speech systems to stay on air and continue to operate because they have federal laws where you're not supposed to just be able to sue somebody and shut them down. So we're very transparent about that. It's why we're doing it. And I'll just address this now here.

28:50 I've never been in bankruptcy. We've never even taken loans here. And I looked at the big situation that was going on, the fact that we were on the verge of insolvency and all their lies. And I said, let's just put all the cards at the table and go into bankruptcy. And then most lawyers don't want to work with us. Most people don't want to work with us, but I got some good lawyers. But then the way the courts work is you have other separate lawyers that don't work for you that handle the actual bankruptcy part. And those lawyers, the judge ruled last week, Judge Lopez in Texas, had not been transparent about everything they'd done in the past. Not bad things, but the fact that they'd publicly done our last bankruptcy, that the Democrats kicked back. So we got Infowars, the website, back and Infowars Health, that's a successful company, and some other things. It was a very real bankruptcy that was tied to free speech systems to like quote pay debtors, but they kicked that back because they wanted their show trials. They didn't want that bankruptcy to hold up all these show trials. And so the lawyers

29:54 not even the lawyers, the CRO that they appointed did not disclose, even though it was public and all over the news, so why disclose that, that they'd done the previous bankruptcy just months before. So I guess if you've been in one bankruptcy and now there's another, you don't fill out a form or something, it's an issue. So the judge removed the CRO and those two separate quote independent lawyers, who were all by the way, the lawyers are Democrats. I'm not saying they did anything, I'm just saying We were like, here's all our books, here's all our stuff, and that happened. So people see that and they think, well if I order at InfoWareStore.com, will I get my products? Yes. Everything we sell, we have in the warehouse, ready to ship. And we've always been able to ship within a day or two of getting the order. Most people get their orders within three days of ordering at InfoWareStore.com. But I talked about this a month ago.

30:45 It wasn't the bankruptcy court, it was the CRO, budgeted a lower number than was needed to fulfill shipping every week. So they had to wait to get a court hearing in a few weeks to even allot the money to ship the product. Now we did it, the judge said of course, shouldn't even have been a hearing, of course you can ship items that come in and that's not held. So that two week thing got us behind about three weeks. We had the books that were pre-ordered, that got us behind a month because we couldn't ship it for a month after the order came in. But now as of last week, all the orders, because we never got more than three weeks behind, have been shipped and we are now shipping within less than a day unless you order on a Friday night. But if you order on a Monday or Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, we are with 90 plus percent of the orders shipping the next day like we were doing previously. So I just want to give all our great hardcore fans and supporters and boosters that news. Because when we got behind three weeks with some orders,

31:41 People are like, whoa, what's what's going on? We got all these emails and calls. Is this the bankruptcy or am I gonna get my stuff? I'm like we sent emails out and said no It was just a bankruptcy issue though that they had to get a hearing even get the money to ship it out But all that's handled all that's done And I'm not against the folks. We had hired to run things or that got separately hired by the court But it just wasn't gelling it wasn't working and And so now we're clear sailing and the judge came in, did not criticize me or Free Speech Systems or the lawyer we hired, who's a very well respected lawyer, the Free Speech Systems lawyer. He was not admonished. It was these other people, that's how bankruptcy works, is they bring in third parties. And so they rearrange the deck chairs on a routine basis and that's what happens. So InfoWars is strong as long as we're solvent.

CHAPTER 08 / 40 Discussion

Book Royalties and Financial Transparency Claims

Alex Jones clarifies the financials of his book, "The Great Reset," noting that while it is a bestseller, high fees from Amazon and publishers result in modest personal royalties, which he reinvests into his company. He addresses court inquiries regarding $9 million in Bitcoin donations, explaining that the funds were used to pay back bills and purchase inventory for the InfoWars store. He warns staff that the company could face closure in months without continued listener support.

the great reset· tony lyons· skyhorse publishing· bitcoin· free speech systems

35:54 And already founding members got discounts on the new coin. There's a bunch of new stuff. There's World War III. It's about to launch. Documentaries, special shows, special events for the members. But the members didn't buy it because they wanted those special perks. Those are coming if we don't get nuked or shut down. And I told folks we might get shut down. It's there. to know you were in the arena, that you fought, that you were at a critical time, did this, and made a critical donation. My goodness, it's so simple. So get the Great Reset War for the World signed. That's a donation as well. That's why it's $99. Or get the regular book for 20-something bucks. Number one book in the world right now. And again, listeners also have sent us emails, well, if you got the number one book in the world, shouldn't that fund your operation? No. I haven't paid, I said 80,000, they said I was being paid, it was $76,000 came in two weeks ago.

36:48 And I was going to put the whole thing into free speech systems, that's my money, but I'm so running out of money I'm going to keep $20,000 and put the other into the company to keep the crew hired. And yeah, they say at current sales rates in a couple weeks I've got another $90,000. But that's how books work with the publisher and the bookstores or Amazon. Amazon gets 65% of a book sale. So The publisher's making $10 on the book. And then after all their costs and all their stuff, I get like $2. And then if it hits this giant amount in the contract, then I get like $4. Wonderful. But yeah, okay, great. 76,000, you know, supposedly more is gonna come. And they only pay you twice a year on the contract. Tony Lyons is being very nice. He knows we're under attack. He just says, I'll pay every month as it comes in.

37:42 And so I'm completely transparent. You know, it's like in the trial, they'll get back to the news. They go, okay, so you got $8 million in Bitcoin donations. I said, no, it's 9 million. By the time we sold it, it was 7.5. I didn't ask that question, I asked how much. And I said, well, it varies. It comes in at one thing. Why is it in your private account? Well, that's how you set up Bitcoin wallets. And some wonderful person gave it to us. And you told me you've given five million of that seven plus million when you cashed it out to Infowars and FreeSpeech. Where's the other stuff? And I said, that's months ago when you deposed me. It's all in there, but $60,000 we left speculatively. You can go look at the wallet. Ah, objection non-responsive. That's not what I asked. You can go to the wallet that's public and see it was 60 last time I looked at it a month ago. And we're hoping it goes up, but I took it all.

38:36 and put it into this company and my crew and the back bills we had and then no money to buy a future product. And we took a couple million of it and bought product, which is now most of it's come in. So thank God we've got the product. Now you just gotta buy the product and we can sit here and fund ourselves and I won't be so desperately up here begging. But this isn't a bluff. It's not BS. I've been on there 28 years. You never heard me spend five, 10, 15 minutes asking for support. The last thing I wanna do is give up. But I'll tell you, if folks don't come through, If you're retiring me or you want me to massively cut back, don't buy the products because you're going to see something. In fact, the crew when they hear about bankruptcy, are we going to get let go? Is it over? Are we going to be gone? I'm like, no. We've given them all the facts. This is a plan to keep everything going as long as folks support the broadcast, you're going to be here. I mean, I won't get paid hardly anything under the agreements, but that's fine. I don't care. I mean, I want to be on air. I started out on AXS TV. All I care about is having my voice and having a house and a car and they'll pay for school supplies and medical stuff.

39:33 I don't worship money. It's not why I do what I do. But now, I'm going to tell the crew next week, if we don't get major funds in the next few months, and if stuff doesn't pan out with this, and if we can't get this bankruptcy straight and get this correct, well, then I will come in here in a few months, and I'll say, hey, you guys got three months to get a job. And I'll say, we'll still have some people maybe, but I don't know. So I'm just being completely honest with everybody. Like, we can shut down. So, you know, this building, the facility, all the crew, all the infrastructure we've got, it'll be a big victory for the New World Order and they desperately want it. So if you're one of those whales out there sitting on... The folks that gave it to us had hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of bitcoins. God bless you, I love you. And we went and looked at their account. You don't know who they are, but you can see the account. They are still sitting on it because obviously they know something we don't know and they think it's going to go back up. Hopefully it does.

CHAPTER 09 / 40 Discussion

Personal Asset Liquidation and Patriot Collectibles Partnership

Alex Jones describes selling his home as an investment move to fund InfoWars operations after predicting a housing market crash. He details a partnership with Patriot Collectibles to sell the 1776 Teddy Roosevelt coin and upcoming lines of Christian and pro-life jewelry. These partnerships allow the network to generate revenue despite being deplatformed by traditional financial and shipping services.

housing market· real estate· 1776 coin· patriot collectibles· christian jewelry

40:30 Whether it's a small Bitcoin donation or an Ethereum donation or whatever it is, infowars.com forward slash crypto. And that's where you can go and that's where you can make a donation. $10 a Bitcoin, $100, $1,000, $1 million. And I'll tell you this, I sat on that Bitcoin for a while and we lost over a million dollars of it. So my policy now is I'm not gonna speculate with it. I'm gonna sell it the second it comes in or the minute I find out about it. and I'm gonna put it into the account for M4s because this is my mission, it's my pledge to you. And that's my biggest frustration. I put almost all my savings that was not that big, emergency backup, I put $3 million in this place in the last year of my savings. I sold my house. I bought this fancy big house four years ago as an investment. I was putting emergency money in the bank. I had $3 million as emergency backup money for the company that I'd been paid over the years that I'd saved

41:30 We're talking a decade of savings. And I went and bought this big, fancy, modern house. And I saw the stock, I saw the housing market. And I even told my wife, I said, be ready in about three years we're gonna sell this. Because I predict before 2022 ends, you're gonna see a housing market crash. I just know this stuff. It's all I do is think about it. And she got to where she liked that house. But six, eight months ago, we sold that sucker. And I dumped that money into this operation. And my wife's totally on board with it now. She gets it. She's like, my God, the housing market is crashing. She's got family that owns some houses in Omaha and they've seen them go down in value. So people are like, how did you know to do that? I mean, I studied the New World Order, folks. And that's why we did this. So my total mission is to be a good steward. My total mission is to fight for you because I'm fighting for myself. And I cannot do this without your support. So thank you all. And I just need everybody

42:24 So tell everybody to tune in and everybody to go to m4shore.com and get a great reset in the world for the world whether signed or unsigned. Go to 1776coin.com for the Teddy Roosevelt coin. This will be the last coin this year. There even is a next year. But this is the fourth coin in the set. It's not a founding member coin. But I don't think people that are founding members are going to mind. We extend founding member status to whoever buys this coin as well. You'll get the perks, you know, the free deals, the discounts as well if you do that by getting the Man of the Arena coin at infowarestore.com or 888-253-3139. 1776coin.com. Can't go to infowarestore.com to get it because it's sold by a separate group of outside folks who came in with the investment and said, hey, I bet you can sell coins.

43:13 and do them in a markup to fund yourself, and all we want is the money back and 10%. So these nice folks paid for the coins, they did it, they funded it, and they've gotten 10% back on what's sold. That's nice of them. It's good of them. So they make a little profit on it for putting the money up front that I didn't have. And that's what Patriot Collectibles is. We're working with them to try to launch a lot of cool Christian jewelry, pro-life stuff. I mean, that's what people are asking for. It's what you want. We're going to try to have it with about 100% markup because you're funding a new operation and a new buildup. So the first stuff has, you know, a four times, three times markup. And the new stuff coming in is going to have a 50% markup or 100% markup, depending on the product.

43:58 And then it'll be self-sufficient and with a smaller profit, they'll be able to operate and still fund our operation. So great folks, really smart people, and glad that they got with us and had these ideas. It's turned out to be really wonderful. And we've looked for other partners, other people that want to help us get around deplatforming because, you know, they're really trying to shut down InfoWareStore.com. But even if they ever shut it down, if you got your order in, it's getting shipped to you. Okay, so just know that. All right, I spent like 20 minutes on that. I apologize for 15 minutes on that, but it's just really, really important. And I want to give you an update on the situation and where we are. Robert Barnes is coming up in 15 minutes, but I want to do this right now.

CHAPTER 10 / 40 Discussion

Greg Reese Report on Sandy Hook Trial Restrictions

A special report by Greg Reese highlights the restrictions placed on Alex Jones during the Connecticut damages trial. Judge Barbara Bellis is shown instructing Jones that he cannot testify about the First Amendment, his compliance with discovery, or the settlement with other defendants like Wolfgang Halbig. The report argues that the trial is a scripted attempt to prevent alternative media from reporting the news.

greg reese· sandy hook· judge bellis· first amendment· robbie parker· wolfgang halbig

44:37 Huge developments on the poison shot. Good developments. Big developments. Coming up, Matt Gaetz, Vindicator, that's just breaking today. It's on Infowars.com. I was talking to Steve Bannon behind the scenes about it. Got some inside baseball. We've got more on inflation, more on the war, and more on megacities that we told you about in Endgame from Globalist Documents now being announced in Europe and in the Middle East. as well as in Canada and what those mega prison cities really, really stand for and what we're facing. And we're also going to get into U.S. oil buffer at a historic low in wake of Joe Biden's unprecedented SPR release today. But before I do that, one last thing. We've done such amazing things as a crew and as hosts and as an audience together. And whatever happens, I love you.

45:27 I want to thank you and I want to appreciate you for shouldering the load in this fight against the globalists. And that's why when you call in and thank me, I just say stop it. I want to fight. I'm like a sheepdog that wants to attack wolves. Just who I am. You're the same way. We're brothers and sisters. Let's just fight together and know I love you and you love me. I'm not thanking you. I love you. You're not thanking me. You love me. We're in this together. And it's beautiful and it's wonderful. And I'm very, very thankful. And however this goes, this goes. But I've always promised the crew too. I'd tell them, you know, there's not a path out of this or a way out of this. I'll be honest with them. And I was just honest with them and I was honest with you. that we're in all each other's hands. So I tell the crew, work extra hard, be vigilant, get stuff done. This is serious. It's important to stay on air during this period. They've thrown so much at us, so much at us, and we still come through it together. Let's not let them win now. We can do this together. So thank you for your support and I love you. All right, here is a

46:24 Gregory's report and John Bowne's report back to back, the abomination of justice, and then John Bowne's report, the taproot of the tree of evil, which is a riff off of a previous report I put out. We'll come back with all this very important news. Stay with us. The biggest concern for the judge in the Alex Jones trial is for the jury to see through their deception. So before the jury is allowed in, she clearly reminds Jones how he should act. how he's not allowed to defend himself. There are certain areas that your attorney is well aware of as opposing counsel that are not going to be asked about and cannot be testified about. And I'm more than happy to go over, it's a very short list, and I'm more than happy to go over it with you if you want me to. But if you don't want me to, that's fine too. I'm simply trying to avoid

47:21 any issues in front of the jury. I don't want to have any unpleasantness. There's no other way to put it. So that's why I'm willing to do it if you want me to do it, but I don't have to do it. Well, please do judge, because... Okay, that's enough. ...my lawyers and things they told me about the... The yes was enough. That's all I need to know. And the lawyers know not to ask you these questions, so the only way there would be a problem is if you gave a non-responsive answer. So if I just go over it briefly, I don't think we're going to have any problem at all. So the lawyers are not going to ask you about, nor can you offer any testimony about, the plaintiff's settlement with the former defendants, Wolfgang Halbig and Corey Sklanka,

48:07 The Soto v. Bushmaster case and who the plaintiff did not sue. So I understand you may not agree with those rulings and this is just a yes or no answer. Do you understand that you may not testify on those topics? Yes. Okay. So there can be no testimony and there's not going to be any questions obviously. regarding the maximum amount of Sandy Hook coverage on your shows or the percentage or proportion of Sandy Hook coverage? Yes or no? Do you understand that that's not testimony that you can offer? You're not going to be asked about it and you can't offer it? Yes. Okay. You may not offer testimony and you're not going to be asked about whether you

48:51 substantially complied or you produced everything or that you challenged the basis for the default ruling. All of these issues may be the basis for an appeal, but they're not going to be asked, nor can you offer that testimony. Do you understand that? Yes. Okay, finally the First Amendment is not an issue in this hearing in damages. No one is going to ask you about the First Amendment. This is not the appropriate forum for you to offer that testimony. Do you understand that sir? Yes. Is there anything that prevents you from understanding what we just talked about? I understand as long as they don't ask those questions.

49:33 Right. They're not going to ask you those questions. If they did, I mean, they're officers of the court and they understand the rulings. So they're not going to ask you those questions. After attacking Free Speech Systems' All-American business model, the plaintiffs then focus on a single video that went viral 10 years ago featuring Robbie Parker. This video was played on InfoWars because it was a viral video, which alone made it newsworthy. Once the plaintiffs established that InfoWars played this video, they dramatically introduced an emotional Robbie Parker in the courtroom. The cameras move in for the close-up, shaking with emotion by the mere presence of Alex Jones. For playing a viral video,

CHAPTER 11 / 40 Discussion

John Bowne Report on Globalist Infiltration and Evil

John Bowne presents a report identifying globalist leaders like Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, and King Charles III as the "root of evil" behind modern crises. The report features Schwab bragging about infiltrating the Canadian cabinet and grooming world leaders through the World Economic Forum. Bowne argues that the Great Reset is a functional dictatorship managed by corporations and unelected officials.

john bowne· klaus schwab· bill gates· king charles iii· world economic forum· eugenics

50:20 As far as Alex Jones' crimes, it's not clear what their claim is. But their argument is clear. According to the plaintiffs, alternative media should not exist and should not be allowed to report the news. Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. You saw this graphic, this political cartoon. Radio listeners all describe it. It shows a tree. And above the surface, the branches, it says inflation, high taxes, open borders, globalism, recession, defund the police, violence, human trafficking, fentanyl, deaths. It goes on and on. But the problem with the graphic

51:21 By Branco, a great political cartoonist, is it's got Joe Biden as the root and the donkey and Obama and a sippy cup. There's a through line of hate from massacres of indigenous people to the original sin of slavery, the terror of the Klan, to anti-immigration, violence against the Irish, Italians, Chinese, Mexicans. So many of those laced through our history. There's a through line. of violence against religious groups, anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic, anti-Mormon, anti-Muslim, anti-Hindu, anti-Sikh. And that through line of hate never fully goes away. But the root causes are really the globalists like Klaus Schwab.

52:11 They're grooming a younger generation of globalist talent. They're focused on cultivating this next generation, and they've proven that they're quite good at this. This is a quote from Schwab in 2017. I have to say that when I mention now names like Miss Angela Merkel, even Vladimir Putin and so on, they've all been young global leaders at the WEF. But what we're very proud of now is the young generation like Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. We penetrate the cabinet. But we see he's complimenting himself for doing what? Infiltrating the Canadian government, grooming the Prime Minister and then infiltrating his cabinet. So again, where does that leave the Daily Beast and their theory that this is some sort of a conspiracy? This is all a rebrand or a relaunch of the New World Order, which was again called a conspiracy. Right.

53:02 and it was to create a totalitarian world government, perhaps something akin to what we've seen from the UN, from the EU, or the WHO, they've been in the news a little bit lately. Unelected, unaccountable to the people, but they tell you what to do with your lives. So what the great reset architects believe is that modern democracy and a free market capitalism, not the kind of capitalism we have today, we'll talk about that in a little bit, but the free market capitalism has failed. And the only way to fix it is by marrying corporate interests and the increasingly powerful state. This will create corporatist super states, or maybe one day a super state, that will see a new world government take shape. It's already happening. Though it might not necessarily take the form of a government, it's a functional dictatorship via corporations. That's what they're doing, and it's already happening. And his corporate controllers

53:55 Like Bill Gates. This guy's unelected and he's got way too much influence in global healthcare. He's a college dropout. He's not even a coder. Did you know that? He doesn't write code. He's just a monopolist. He's a criminal and a monopolist. And he went to Jeffrey Epstein's island, which makes a lot of people say he's a child raper. He told Trump, don't set up a commission on vaccine, to study vaccines. That would be a dead end. That would be a bad thing. Why? What are you... What are they gonna find out? They're gonna find out that vaccines are safe and effective, right? Wouldn't that be good?

54:35 and the King of England who is involved in all this eugenics and depopulation, King Charles III. At the moment we've so degraded natural systems, ecosystems, biodiversity, that it's becoming increasingly impossible for nature to sustain us. At the moment it's all take-take. Now we've reached the situation where we really need four planets like Earth to survive or to provide enough for everybody. But really at the end of the day, it's the devil. is at the root. The root cause, ladies and gentlemen, is not King Charles, not Bill Gates, not Klaus Schwab, not the donkey, but it's evil. Call it what you want, you can say what it is, you can play games all day, but this is a fight between good versus evil.

CHAPTER 12 / 40 Discussion

Trial Excerpt Regarding Cryptocurrency Advertisements

A clip from the Connecticut trial shows a plaintiff's attorney questioning Alex Jones about his use of cryptocurrency to fund InfoWars. Jones defends the practice as a necessary means to fight the "Deep State" and maintain his voice. The attorney suggests that Jones uses the courtroom proceedings as an advertisement for his Bitcoin donation page.

alex jones· cryptocurrency· bitcoin· deep state· trial testimony

55:26 and everything the New World Order does is destructive of their own interest. They go out of their way to kill, steal, and destroy because they like it. Because they hate God's creation. They hate human destiny. They are fundamentally, spiritually jealous of the tree of life, and they want the tree of death. All right, folks. That's a very powerful report. And I'm going to now air before I hit more news and bring Robert Barnes on and hit this other news. some of these little excerpts that the crew put together. One of them is where they attack me over cryptocurrency like I'm a criminal. Show the crew put a little promo together from that. And then we're going to go ahead and air before I left yesterday, Connecticut went to a apple orchard with my wife and daughter, my five-year-old, and that's AJ talks about

56:26 the ultimate revolution, God's green earth, which is the counter to the tree of death. So here's a little excerpt from the trial and then we'll go to the ultimate revolution, God's green earth. It's okay, let's just stop it. It's all right. We're all good. Let's just stop it. Stop the tape. It's all right. Let's just stop. Let's reset. We're live show. No big deal. It's not the crew's fault. They were supposed to already air that and I just jumped in at the end of the John Bowne report because it was so good and messed that up. Get the audio faded up, get it ready, and now let's roll it again. Because one of the ways that your audience you encourage your audience to give you money is in cryptocurrency Donations, right? Yes, and you have a page on your website. That's just for cryptocurrency donations, right? Infowars.com forward slash crypto. Is that a little advertisement just there? Well, we're fighting the deep state. We need money. All right. This is it. Give crypto fun info wars

57:28 Sponsor us with Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, right? That will end up as a clip on your show tonight. Your advertisement for a cryptocurrency page. You know, I mean, people want to keep us in the fight. So I hope whoever the big whales are that give us money before keep doing it. We'll just keep mincing money as you're in this courtroom. Let's move on. People care about the First Amendment. There's a famous term people use, and it's God's green earth.

CHAPTER 13 / 40 Discussion

God's Green Earth and Agrarian Values

During a break from the trial, Alex Jones visits a Connecticut apple orchard to discuss the abundance of "God's Green Earth." He advocates for a return to the agrarian society envisioned by Thomas Jefferson as a counter to the Great Reset's synthetic foods and GMOs. Jones encourages listeners to spend time in nature to break the psychological spell of modern technology and media.

connecticut· apple orchard· thomas jefferson· agrarianism· gmo· nature

58:10 And here I am in Connecticut on just a few acres of apple trees. And you can feed thousands of people a month just on these couple acres. This is God's green earth. We have so much abundance. You find an airplane over most places in the country or the world, there's nobody there. We're all fighting over resources. Look at Ukraine. Russia is openly declaring war now, shipping in 300,000 troops. We're on the verge of nuclear conflict. And here we are with the resources for everybody. We just work together, but we keep killing each other. And that's the difference between Christ and the devil or barbarism versus the Renaissance. Just take a look right here. One tree alone produces hundreds of delicious, amazing apples a month. Apple pies, you name it, all the vitamin C, everything you need. You could live off these if you needed to.

59:06 and it's right here in the palm of our hand. A hundred years ago, 90% of people in the U.S. were self-sufficient and could take care of themselves on a farm. Today it's 10% or less. That's a time bomb. That's the great reset. Synthetic foods, GMO, taking us off the land. They want Jenkins Earring. They want Franklin Foods. We've been given God's green earth. We've got to recognize we've already been given heaven, but we've got to take that victory and that destiny in our hands instead of all this idiocy. The powerful corrupt elites that threaten my human destiny, they're playing us off against each other. And it's just that simple. Just flipping a switch and realizing about productivity and working together and being strong, not being run over, but being productive and building up a real economy.

1:00:03 based on agrarian farming society that Thomas Jefferson talked about, we win. The power of the people. This is a victory. And that's what M4 War stands for. So, sunbathe, forest bathe, spend time in nature, grow a small garden. It's that first step to a bigger world. The Globalist wants you locked in your house in a VR fake reality. You want to counter the Prozac, counter the television screen sickness from Netflix? Just start putting your feet in the mud. Just start taking a swim in a river. Just start going out in nature under the stars at night, and you will break the spell they have over you. Believe me, because I've been through it, and I broke their spell as well by bathing in God's incredible creation.

1:00:55 And one last point, God didn't just give us the fish of the sea and the cows of the land and the birds of the air and all this great fruit, all these great vegetables. God gave us our children and our wives and husbands. Humanity's our greatest value. So when we abort and kill our children, we're throwing away the most incredible harvest we've got for the future. So don't throw away these apples, don't cut down these trees, and stop killing our children. So don't ever, as dark as the hour is, and as out of control things are, don't you ever not realize how important you are in what you've done with your word of mouth and your action. And I'm talking to people that went to that puppet courthouse in Connecticut, Plymouth, or Stickers up everywhere. We commend you. So we are this puppet courthouse, yeah.

1:01:43 Yes, that's what you're referring to? It's not mostly peaceful protests where they burn down $2 million, but that's good. But then conservatives put up stickers and we're bad. I know where y'all need to go to prison. Why don't we talk about cryptocurrency? Because one of the ways that you encourage your audience to give you money is in cryptocurrency donations, right? Yes. And you have a page on your website that's just for cryptocurrency donations, right? Infowars.com forward slash crypto. Is that a little advertisement just there? Well, we're fighting the deep state. We need money. All right. This is it. Give crypto fun info wars. Sponsor us with bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, right? That will end up as a clip on your show tonight. Your advertisement for your cryptocurrency page. You know, I mean, people want to keep us in the fight. So I hope whoever the big whales are that have given us money before keep doing it. We'll just keep it.

CHAPTER 14 / 40 Discussion

Robert Barnes on the Connecticut Show Trial

Constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes joins the program to analyze the Connecticut trial, which he labels a "Soviet-style show trial." Barnes argues that the court has stripped Alex Jones of his right to a day in court by limiting his testimony to "yes or no" answers and barring mentions of the First Amendment. He claims the trial is a template intended to be used against other political dissidents.

robert barnes· sandy hook· show trial· due process· connecticut· legal analysis

1:02:42 Well, my good friend, one of the smartest people I know, Robert Barnes, constitutional lawyer, criminal lawyer, historian joins us for the next hour. Thank you so much for joining us, Robert. We're going to obviously get into the show trial that they admit is the template to take down everybody else. and your analysis as you did the last two weeks live coverage of it and a fabulous job with massive viewership on your own platform. And then after we cover this for 20 minutes or so, I want to get to the huge developments that I know you're also at the tip of the spear on, suing Pfizer with whistleblowers and other things. Adams to Sunset private sector vaccine mandate. I had some New York police off duty as our security. They were really excited about this. They told me about it a few days ago before he even announced it.

1:03:37 Also, US Supreme Court to consider case against COVID vaccine mandate for New York City. The military has stopped it in four branches, but not the Coast Guard. And then some even more important news when it comes to their fake prosecutions. Matt Gaetz framed, Matt Gaetz frame up collapses DOJ prosecutors recommend no charges due to credibility questions of main witness. A woman who's like 20 something years old now saying, She had sex with him when she was 17, but he didn't know. And then there's no proof of that. That's not child trafficking. That's not pedophilia, ladies and gentlemen. So they protect Jeffrey Epstein, Johns. They don't release the list of them, and they act like Matt Gaetz is a pedophile because years and years and years ago, he was at some party on a Caribbean island with a bunch of strippers.

1:04:31 Well, I'm not saying that's perfect. It's not a smart move, but he wasn't even in politics then. Hanging out with a bunch of strippers is not pedophilia. So this is a big deal. We'll be getting to that coming up as well. and so much more. Robert Barnes joins us. Robert will also obviously get into Russia, the huge escalation there that is the big central story, their national draft being announced, Putin saying I'm not bluffing, threatening nuclear war. That's coming up this hour as well, but I think it's important front and center to talk about this show trial and your observations of this and where you see this going because I don't want to be over positive. They got a bunch of crying parents. We're barred from putting forward evidence, but

1:05:10 A lot of former judges and current judges and a lot of people called my lawyers and said, wow, this blew up in their face. This is not going well. Chris Maddy's dad, who's a famous lawyer, he's the main lawyer against me, blew up at him and was screaming at him Thursday after I left the stand in front of everybody. They are completely freaked out. They're asking me to be sanctioned and all the rest of them for doing press conferences. they don't think it went well, but start wherever you want because this is a historic case obviously and the blueprint to take everybody else down so lay it out for us. Yeah, I mean it's a show trial. It is a classic version of a show trial. I mean even the Soviets would be embarrassed by aspects of this show trial. And what I mean by that is it's a trial where you're not allowed to have your day in court. The American system of justice is all about everybody gets their quote day in court. So much so that it's a common term colloquially used in everyday terminology.

CHAPTER 15 / 40 Discussion

FBI Lawyer Plaintiff and Lack of Evidence

Robert Barnes discusses the lead plaintiff in the Connecticut case, an FBI lawyer who admitted on the stand that he had never heard of Alex Jones before the lawsuit. Barnes highlights the absurdity of suing for intentional infliction of emotional distress when the plaintiff could not identify a specific statement that caused him harm. He also notes that the defense was defaulted despite producing massive amounts of discovery.

fbi· libel· defamation· consumer fraud· sandy hook· discovery

1:06:04 And yet that is precisely what they've stripped you and denied you from doing. You can't even say the name Hillary Clinton. You can't say certain words. You can't claim you're innocent. The judge even instructed that you couldn't even say anything beyond yes or no. I mean, that's how ludicrous it was. And why is that? And then you've had a bunch of evidence presented that has absolutely nothing to do with compensatory injury, which purportedly is what this trial is limited to. the almost all the evidence. I mean, they were talking about Ukraine. They were talking about big tech. They're talking a lot about you. They're talking a lot about Infowars. They're not talking about what damages individual plaintiffs suffer. Let's be clear, just to interject here, they showed a magazine we put out with Obama on the cover saying Obama comes for your guns.

1:06:48 Let them talk about how I didn't like Obama in case jurors were Democrats. And when my lawyer tried to come back and cross-examine, the judge said, no politics. I mean... Oh, it's very much scripted. And there's the point of this whole trial is to present a trial where only one side is allowed to present their case. And it's the part of the case that's not considered relevant for this stage of the trial. And that's exactly what's taking place. And fortunately, you were able to successfully resist their effort for you to play to their script. for you to stick to their tale, for you to play the villain in their role. Because the truth of the matter, it's why they could never afford a trial on the merit. That's why they could never give you your day in court, as we've seen presented. The lead witness was an FBI guy who knew nobody who died that day. Why is he suing? Why is he here? He

1:07:41 He's still in the FBI, FBI lawyer, an FBI lawyer suing Alex Jones. And he admitted that I never said his name and he never heard of me until the suit. Yeah. What he said on the stand, he didn't identify a single statement he heard you make that caused him any distress. He didn't report any of that that I saw on the stand at all. And he's their lead witness, their lead plaintiff in this case. That speaks volumes to what's going on. You have a FBI lawyer helping to initiate and instigate this case, suing for things like consumer fraud when he didn't buy a product or anything from InfoWars, suing for defamation and libel and intentional infliction of emotional distress when he never heard InfoWars mention him at all ever. And he couldn't even identify what statement it was by InfoWars that caused him distress. That shows you how nuts is. And his own testimony rebutted the plaintiff's theory, which is the Sandy Hook denier community long predated

1:08:38 and long post dated anything Alex Jones or Infowars ever said about the subject for a moment. And so this has nothing to do with you. They're trying to blame you for the actions of other people that they can't even tie or connect to you because it doesn't even line up chronologically. So it exposed their whole case in a quick, easy nutshell. And then you add to that, that they have had all this evidence. I mean, how was a default judgment issued on the theory that you didn't produce discovery when they have more discovery than any plaintiff has ever had in the history of libel lawsuit. They have all the banking, all the text messages, all the emails, the daily orders which they cherry pick the few biggest days to make our viewers think we have plenty of money. And they're showing it and then we're not allowed to say we gave them evidence.

CHAPTER 16 / 40 Discussion

Weaponization of Grief and School Safety Failures

Robert Barnes and Alex Jones discuss the "weaponization of private grief" for political profit. Barnes argues that the focus on gun control after Sandy Hook was a cover-up for failures in school safety and the role of Big Pharma in the mental health crisis. They contend that the media and politicians profit from school shootings while attacking those who defend the Second Amendment.

norm pattis· sandy hook· school safety· second amendment· big pharma· false flag

1:09:25 Exactly. Not allowed to say you're innocent. Not allowed to say their whole theory of the case is wrong and bogus. It is what Norm Padish described it as in the opening statement in the case, your lawyer. What Norm said is that this is an attempt to weaponize private grief into political profit. And by the way, let me just commend you. You were on the case for about a year, but you had so many cases and it was in multiple states that you bowed out. You're the guy that hired Norm Pattis and he's definitely done a really good job. Yeah, Norm is a great old school civil rights lefty. He's like Dershowitz. He's one of those people that actually, part of the old left, the Berkeley free speech movement, that still believes in free speech, that still believes in due process, that still believes in trial by jury, that still believes in defending the dissidents, the independents, the outspoken voices disfavored by the institutional power and establishment.

1:10:19 And I think what we saw—I mean, everything was grandstanding from the plaintiffs. Ninety percent of the evidence had nothing to do with what supposedly is being tried here. Any aspect of the defense was mostly precluded in gag. I have never seen a judge tell a party that they can't answer any question except by yes or no. And many of those questions were simply not yes or no questions. There are questions that could not be capably answered yes or no. And then if you speak out, you're threatened with contempt charges. If you speak out in front of the courthouse and exercise your First Amendment in front of the courthouse, they're attacking you and wanting to sanction you for that. And remember, she said, you can't speak to these eight things. You're innocent, bankruptcy, Remington settlement, any of that. And the other lawyers won't ask you that. That's all Maddie did.

1:11:06 Oh yeah, absolutely, because the goal was to pre-script the trial. So the judge says you can't answer in certain ways. The judge is allowing the lawyer to ask a lot of questions and go into a lot of evidence that has nothing to do with damages, nothing to do with compensatory injury. And yet, that was the goal. It's very much what show trials were all about. Show trials were about scripting something for public theater. And that's what this entire case has been about because the court has ignored basic rules of due process and trial by jury and rules of evidence in the process, not allowing complete the rule of completeness, for example, requires they present your entire statement as to a subject.

1:11:45 They're refusing to do that, not allowing you to present it, to contrast with it, not allowing impeachment material. For example, I was waiting to hear from any of the plaintiffs how their injury was caused by something you said or did. Instead, what I heard were stories that didn't mostly relate to you at all. They're now not only eviscerating First Amendment protections in order to undermine Second Amendment outspokenness in America, while getting rid of due process under the Fifth Amendment, right to counsel protections under the Sixth Amendment, right to trial by jury under the Seventh Amendment,

1:12:23 all of those things. They're also now trying to selectively say that if you say certain things and somebody else does something, you're responsible for what those things are, but only if you're on the wrong political side, even if they have no causal connection. How are people harassing Sandy Hook parents related to anything InfoWars said? InfoWars had said nothing about Sandy Hook. they have no evidence of anybody harassing him. It's all literally, the only person I ever said his name is Robbie Parker. And I said, the internet thinks this is fake. Here's the clip. I said, Sandy Hook happened for like a year. The internet didn't believe it. Our listener said, please look into this. So I said, let's look into it. So the idea that I can't even question is just insane. I can't get into attorney client stuff, obviously, Robert, but they were calling our lawyers back there yesterday morning. They were in full panic.

CHAPTER 18 / 40 Discussion

Chris Mattei's Courtroom Outburst and Tactical Failures

Alex Jones and Robert Barnes review an exchange where attorney Chris Mattei reportedly lost his temper in court. Barnes suggests that Mattei's frustration stems from his inability to trap Jones in a pre-scripted narrative. They argue that the plaintiff's counsel is more interested in political theater than the emotional injury of the families they represent.

chris mattei· alex jones· globalists· cross-examination· courtroom drama

1:20:08 would determine that justice is on your side, not the plaintiff's lawyer's side, trying to politically weaponize family grief for their personal and political profit. And that's what they couldn't have the world know. And that's why they've gone to such great lengths to strip you of your right to your day in court. Robert Barnes, I've got a few clips I want to play. But there was that whole exchange with me and Matty. The full thing has been put out on Twitter. But it's like five minutes long where he's screaming at me. He's yelling at me. He's freaking out. and I call him an ambulance chaser, he doesn't know what to say. Why is everyone, even on their side, saying this was such a disaster for them? Because there's a tactical way to approach this. In other words, if he was motivated by protecting the interest of his clients first, then that's a very different—well, one, there's really no relevance to your testimony because at this point it's only about compensatory injury.

1:21:03 Right so even putting you on the stand is about grandstanding political theater by the plaintiff's lawyer for his personal political profit, not for the gain and interest of his clients relevant material to the trial. So that's part one. But part two is his approach would focus on whatever injury He believes that they have suffered in discussing those issues with you. Instead, he's talking about your views on a whole bunch of topics. You're polling on whether things might happen, whether it may be a false flag event before the midterms. He's asking you about other products you do. He's asking you generic products. He's trying to misattribute and misallocate blame

1:21:39 by trying to blame you for the actions of third parties you have nothing to do with, also trying to pretend that InfoWars is successful or got any level of public support from Sandy Hook. Everybody who follows InfoWars knows that's false, knows it's always been false. Sandy Hook didn't make money for InfoWars. Sandy Hook cost money for InfoWars. He knows that. that. So he's got to try to hide and lie in grandstand. But because he's dealing from a deck of deceit, he cannot come across as a credible, authentic, truthful voice in the courtroom. And that's why he continued to look bad, is because he was unable to trap you. He was unable to provoke you into the caricatured response they imagine you are. And he was unable to get away with

1:22:23 constant lies in the manner and method in which he made his presentation. And as he couldn't get away with it, in his grandstand vision of this political theater where he's the hero at the end of the documentary and the film, he lost it. And that's why people watching are like, hold on a second. I thought this was about parents. I thought this was about emotional injury. I thought this was about undisputed dishonesty. I'm not seeing any of that. I'm seeing politics, politics, politics, theater, theater, theater, because that's in fact what the Plaintiff's Council has always been about. They have used these parents for the gain of the political class with which they are aligned and the political causes with which they are assigned. That's the reality of it.

CHAPTER 19 / 40 Discussion

Rigged Trials and the Definition of False Flags

The discussion explores the legal definition of a "false flag," with Barnes explaining that it refers to an event where the culprit is misidentified, not necessarily that the event didn't happen. Jones defends his right to question the official narrative of Sandy Hook, citing the historical precedent of the Reichstag fire. They argue that the series of trials in Texas and Connecticut are being recognized by the public as rigged proceedings.

show trial· false flag· reichstag fire· robbie parker· sandy hook

1:23:08 All right, I want to get in to Matt Gaetz. I want to get into COVID and their ongoing forced inoculations failing around the country. I want to hit the Russia escalation. It's obviously the central big point here. But in a few more minutes of this, why do Democrats in the deep state not think two, three, four steps ahead? Or are they? Because like fat people at a buffet, they did three trials. One's already happened in Texas. One is in the middle right now in Connecticut. Another in months. here in Texas and the longer they run show trials. It's one thing to run one. People started questioning. Now they're really seeing it's rigged and everybody realizes they're being conned so they're paying very close attention now. By the third one, everybody's going to know it's rigged and it's going to blow up with their face. I mean that as a lay person that's what I see Robert.

1:24:02 Oh, exactly. When I was telling people for months that these are show trials, that these are based on a fake narrative, it's a fake case. It's a fake case because it's a narrative that's false. It's a narrative that's fictional. It's a narrative that was never true. Infowars didn't stalk any Infowars didn't send people to stalk anybody. Infowars didn't even talk about almost everybody suing ever. Infowars mostly was a critic, as Paul Joseph Watson, the editor during this entire timeframe, was a critic of the Sandy Hook denier movement. Infowars was a restraint on the Sandy Hook denier movement. Infowars made no money off of the Sandy Hook denier movement. We had debates. We had on-air debates on who was right.

1:24:47 Absolutely. Indeed, people were mad at you, calling you Bo Bridges, saying that you were fake, because you were critical of the Sandy Hook denier movement for so long and so often, and so many other people were at Infowars. And the reality is the reason why that people went to conspiracy theories in the denier movement was because the politicians in Connecticut were covering up their complicity and culpability in the inadequacy of school safety. That's why they're destroying the school. That's why they're hiding information from the Sunshine Laws. That's why they're not producing information pursuant to Freedom of Information Act or Open Records Act requests. That triggered a lot of people's conspiracy theories. They end up being wrong in their conclusion, but there was in fact cover-up taking place by the political class in

1:25:31 in Connecticut, and the only case the Connecticut courts didn't allow to go forward was the one that exposed the schools for inadequate school safety. They allowed $73 million shakedown of a gun manufacturer's insurers, and now they're allowing another effort to not only- And by the way, the judge bars me from letting him know about that. Here's the clip that Cernovich put out. He said he's a lawyer as well. Courtroom drama you won't see in a show, and this is real. Here is just part of the meltdown of Chris Madding. That's the real Rocky Parker, isn't it? I mean, I said years ago I thought something would happen. Robert Parker's sitting right here. He's real, isn't he? Yes. And for years you put a target on his back, didn't you? Objection in the form of that, Judge.

1:26:13 Well, I mean, I've never said his name. It's true. I haven't said other people's names. I know who they are. You put a target on his back just like you did every single parent and loved one sitting in your gym. No, I didn't. No, you didn't. That's argumentative. There's no... It's speculative. There is no foundation for it. And it's inappropriate to... Just move on. He's a real people. You know that, Mr. Johnson? I think you just told him to move on. Just like all the Iraqis, but you liberals kill and love. It's just, you're unbelievable. You switch on emotions on and off when you want. You're just analysts Jason. Why don't you show a little respect? Objection, Judge. I think that you get what you give in this courtroom. Objection. You have families in this courtroom here that lost children, sisters, wives, moms. Is this a struggle session? Are we in China?

1:27:08 I've already said I'm sorry hundreds of times and I'm done saying I'm sorry. I didn't progenerate this, I wasn't the first person to say it. American gun owners didn't like being blamed for this as the left did so we rejected it mentally and said it must not be true. But I legitimately thought it might have been staged and I stand by that and I don't apologize for it. And don't apologize Mr. Jones, please don't apologize. No, I've already apologized to the parents over and over again. Because we know you're going to catch him. Objection! Don't apologize to you. You're going to do it again. Objection, judge. And then she went on to act like my lawyer and me did it. What do you make of part of that exchange, Robert Barnes?

CHAPTER 20 / 40 Discussion

Judicial Bias and Bankruptcy Testimony Conflict

Robert Barnes criticizes Judge Bellis for a lack of "judicious temperament" and for sustaining objections without legal basis. A specific conflict is highlighted where attorney Chris Mattei asked Jones about financial reports, knowing that the judge had barred Jones from discussing the bankruptcy or the court-appointed CRO. Jones describes this as a "straightjacket" designed to provoke a contempt charge.

judge bellis· chris mattei· bankruptcy· cro· contempt· discovery

1:28:07 Well, the judge has shown a lack of judicious temperament throughout the proceeding. I think the entire case has been an embarrassment and a shame on the American civil justice system. This is a show trial that even the Soviets would be ashamed of, and the court has not maintained any control over plaintiff's counsel whatsoever, and that's why these things are happening. Absolutely. Barnes, I'm getting this other clip ready. Keep giving your analysis. Absolutely. So I mean, what you saw in that proceeding throughout, you've seen attempts by the judge to grant objections made by the plaintiffs' counsel without any basis being identified. So for those folks out there in the law, you can't just say,

1:28:50 objection. You have to say objection, certain rule or certain evidentiary basis. She wasn't even requiring until this week a basis. The plaintiff's counsel would just get up and say objection, she would just grant it, sustain it, but without any analysis, any argument or even the legal basis being listed. It was just embarrassing. It was something like out of idiocracy. The judge in idiocracy has looked more fair and more impartial than this judge in Connecticut had. And it's because of the sort of political, partisan, professional class prejudice. against populist and populist voices in America. That's also part of it. But it's also part and parcel of we cannot have these public tragedies and traumas be events whereby people use those for political partisan gain. And let's be clear. And then say they're not political, like they had this FBI agent, never said his name, didn't know who he was. He admitted never talked about on the show, never showed an image of him. But he's suing me and he gets up there and attacks me and cries.

1:29:47 Then they have a counterterrorism expert up saying I'm this mastermind Lex Luthor, but he's a guy actually involved in real psyops It's just totally insane. The reason our information is powerful is we're saying drag queen pedophile times wrong Open borders is wrong fentanyl is wrong war with Russia's wrong. The power of the propaganda is it's true. I The power of the information is people agree. I'm just a regular guy who gets on the air and covers news and that's what they're afraid of because I'm not taking orders from them. Here's another clip with your big hit partner with your syndicated show, Viva Fry, saying, I'm watching Alex Jones' testimony from yesterday. What is going on is truly making a mockery of the judicial system. This is a key clip here to us. I can go in and I can pull up reports myself, but I've not been

1:30:39 Doing that because I don't we don't just question is who's doing it now when you do get well I'm not allowed does anybody send you I'm not I'm not allowed under the judge's order to tell you about what happened my company That's not true. Mr. Jones what I'm asking you is who sends you daily sales reports? OK. You're telling me to answer the question. All right. So I'm going to excuse the jury again. You're going to get your exercise today, for those of you who wear ship kits. So just put your pads down, and you'll follow along.

1:31:19 I think he's following the rules here. I think he was probably going to say one of the bankruptcy deals. That's the bankruptcy people are in control of it. Who sends you the daily sales report? Objection, objection, objection. They've taken it away. Objection. Well that was nice and loud. That calls for the identity of a person. No, no. So in fairness to Mr. Jones, He could have said whatever the lingo is for a bankruptcy. Yes, until yesterday, the CRO, the bankruptcy is in full control of everything. And they. It's not responsive to my question. Objection. No. Because I can't see. So the question. No, you did the right thing. You asked.

1:32:07 Now the reason that's so important is It's now the bankruptcy CRO, who the court removed for other reasons just a week ago or a few days ago. Now I don't get them every day. I get like every three or four days I got to call them because it goes to their bank and I've got to then get the report. I don't get it live time anymore. That's what bankruptcy is.

CHAPTER 22 / 40 Discussion

Public Perception and the New York Times vs. Sullivan

Robert Barnes predicts that the extreme nature of the Connecticut trial will eventually backfire as even liberal legal analysts recognize the threat to due process. He discusses the historical significance of New York Times v. Sullivan and how the current weaponization of the tort system mirrors the tactics used to punish civil rights organizations in the past.

supreme court· libel· defamation· civil rights· due process· jury pool

1:37:19 Obviously the judge is starting to panic. Obviously Maddie's panicking, he's being criticized everywhere. As people see, my god this is really a kangaroo court. And even mainline legal analysts who are Democrats are going, this is really embarrassing. I mean what did they think was going to happen when they did this? They thought their show trial would look like a Soviet-style show trial, that it would play to their script. They don't know how to handle it when Norm Pattis refuses to forfeit his duties and obligations of advocacy for his client. They don't know how to handle it when you refuse to answer dishonestly and insist on answering honestly.

1:37:55 I mean, as you pointed out, he was like, oh, aren't you just obsessed with your perception? You're like, no, I'm obsessed with beating globalists. That's what I'm obsessed with. And he can't answer, he can't respond or retort because that doesn't fit their script. And they don't know how to react when their script isn't going to script. And so- Well, he was projecting, because all he cares about is looking at the camera being a cutie cake, when no, I'm ready to die for this. I mean, I'm trying to tell the truth. I'm a good guy. Sometimes I get overzealous, but I care about defeating them. That's the mission. I'm is defeating you, jackass. Absolutely. It's defeating this agenda that would strip us of our core rights and liberties. And every this case is a perfect emblematic example of it. It not only implicates First Amendment freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of press, freedom of association, and the Second Amendment right to self-defense that depends on the First Amendment's ability to keep it robustly protected in the court of public opinion.

1:38:48 but it's the right to privacy under the fourth amendment because a lot of information was forced to be disclosed that should not have been legally or constitutionally. It's the fifth amendment right to due process which is being denied on a regular basis. And like you said a lot of top lawyers are saying this going wait all his evidence is on the screen how was he defaulted? Exactly. I mean, that's what they because they all bought the media narrative that, oh, Jones never participate in discovery. Now he's told me that's a complete lie. You produced more discovery than any defendant in the history of a media libel case. I've challenged people for over a year now to produce any case where somebody was defaulted who produced the amount of discovery you did, or to produce any case where a media defendant produced as much discovery as you did. Does anybody think the New York Times and the Project Veritas case and the Sarah Palin case and the Nicholas Sandman case, Covington case, that they had to produce their financial information? I've seen no evidence for them to ever produce. No, they won't even produce their emails about Project Veritas.

1:39:47 Exactly. They'll produce nothing. And what we're seeing is this political weaponization of the legal system with judges who don't enforce the law and don't discipline rogue plaintiff and prosecutor lawyers that they're politically aligned with, and jury pools that are very tainted. I mean, you look at that Project Veritas verdict in the District of Columbia yesterday, that these are the kind of cases that are going to come about because they're doing what the Southern corrupt political apparatus did during the 1950s, which which is weaponize the legal system, weaponize law enforcement, weaponize the justice system to suppress dissident speech on civil rights and civil liberties. That's how New York Times versus Sullivan came about. It was a huge verdict that was in excess of any reason or proportionality because the jury pool wanted to punish civil rights people. Unlike your case, in that case, they actually got a bunch of facts wrong. The

CHAPTER 23 / 40 Discussion

Elizabeth Williamson New York Times Correction

New York Times writer Elizabeth Williamson is forced to issue a correction after tweeting a fabricated quote attributed to Alex Jones' lawyer, Norm Pattis. Williamson had claimed Pattis told the court that Jones had "badly damaged himself" on the stand. Jones and Barnes describe this as a clear example of the "paper of record" engaging in the very disinformation they accuse others of spreading.

elizabeth williamson· new york times· fake news· twitter· norm pattis· sandy hook

1:40:40 It wasn't like NAACP and other civil rights organizations were purely innocent in that case. They made mistakes. But the Supreme Court was like, hold on a second. This is obvious overt political weaponization of the state power of judicial control over people through the civil tort system that's going to gut First Amendment civil rights and free speech and free press in America unless we put a limit on it. And that's exactly what they're reopening that door all all over again in this case. So if you care about any constitutional right, you have to object to this case. Let me do this. This is the final point I want to hit on this. We're going to play a little clip and come back from break and get into all the other huge news because that's where you're really going to shine here. I want your view on Russia and the economy and Matt Gaetz and the midterms in 45 days and so much more. But take Elizabeth Williamson. This woman is a Sandy Hook groupie. This woman writes her book, tries to make money on Sandy Hook, accuses me of it.

1:41:35 She goes around for years and says stuff that's not true or twisted about me constantly. We never really follow her, but yesterday, I'm about to leave the Airbnb I'm at because we decided not to do the cross-examination and just do my own case next week. And one of my security guys walks over and goes, look, here's the New York Times. It's all over the news saying your lawyer just attacked you in court and said you're a horrible person. Everything you say is fake. You did a terrible job. And so that's why you're not testifying today. So I call Norm, he calls me back in 10 minutes at a break, he goes, he starts literally freaking out, he said, we didn't even talk about you in the court case. I mean, it was behind the, it was in chambers and they wanna cancel this, they're on the ropes. I didn't say that, I think you did a great job. Everybody's calling me, said you did a great job. He goes, you're joking. And I sent her the text and he literally said he lost control. He started screaming at her when he saw her in the hallway. And so she says, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I shouldn't have done it.

1:42:36 So I'm thinking, Norm, I want to trust you, but it's hard to believe she'd lie that bad because I'm telling you she's going to retract it's a lie. She then said, I'm sorry I made it up in a tweet. So she puts it out against 20,000 retweets when I first saw it saying, well, Jones's lawyer says he's horrible. That's why he's not testifying. He did such a bad job. I'll show it to you in a moment. The article's on Infowars.com. This isn't about Alex Jones. It's just like they lied about WMDs in Iraq, New York Times, I knew they were doing it. They lie on purpose everything they're accusing me of. Imagine if I was a court reporter and I said, this person's lawyer just got up and said their client's a horrible person, you better be able to back it up. What insulated world does Elizabeth Williamson live in? She's basically, in my view, a stalker. What insulated world do you live in where you go and make up a fake quote on Twitter

1:43:32 Not thinking people are going to challenge you. And the truth is we've not been challenging her. But now they've gone so far. Here's the headline, Alex Jones' Sandy Hook trial, New York Times writer issues correction after tweeting fake news. And she took the tweet down so you can't see it. We have a screenshot. Alex Jones, Jones could have testified today, but as his lawyer said in court, didn't say this in court, I went back and watched the video. But as his lawyer said in court this morning, he so badly damaged himself yesterday that he's time away from the jury. Norm's doing victory laps. Everybody's calling him saying Chris Mandy crapped the bed. Judges are calling him. Everybody's flipping out. It's incredible. Everybody agrees it blew up in their face. He gets up there and says, well, everybody, you know, we had such a big victory. We're not going to do this. She goes, I'm not going to let that happen. So she goes and lies, even though this is on television. None of it was said, not even close. And then

1:44:28 deletes the tweet and says this, folks, I'm gonna delete this tweet after talking with Ed Pattis Norm, Jones' lawyer, who raised it in the courtroom. He wouldn't have said it's a lie, the judge wouldn't let him say it, though not with me. I asked him after what's wrong. He makes the accurate point that he did not say this as I wrote here. I apologize for the error. It's not an error, you're a lying witch that flew in there on a broom. I mean, I mean Norm was beside us and said Norm stop freaking out when I told him he said he said I called her in the break and he goes you're joking she didn't say that he said we didn't even talk about you in the hearing we went back and then decided to recess for the day because they were in shambles he goes he goes you're joking right he didn't believe me

CHAPTER 24 / 40 Discussion

Media Malpractice and the History of the New York Times

The discussion expands to the historical failures of the New York Times, including Walter Duranty's cover-up of the Soviet famines and the paper's role in promoting the Iraq War's WMD narrative. Barnes argues that the New York Times is responsible for more death and harm through "fake news" than any other organization. He characterizes Williamson's recent fabrication as "confession through projection."

new york times· walter duranty· stalin· soviet famine· wmds· fake news

1:45:18 She literally pulled it out of her butt to say that and think she can do that. I mean, these people are insane. I know I'm ranting Barnes, but give us your take on this. What you're seeing is another case of confession through projection. So here you have a libel case being covered by a journalist for the so-called paper of record in America, the New York Times. And yet she's the one doing the lying and the libeling and the defaming. So, and it reflects a broader pattern because the big allegation by her and big media has been that Alex Jones and Infowars profited off of Sandy Hook.

1:45:54 when the truth is, and that doing so will propagate more bad events in the future, when the truth is it's big media, it's Elizabeth Williamson, it's the New York Times that profited off of Sandy Hook, that profits off of school shootings, and they know their continued media coverage of it, their glorification and glamorization effectively with mass publication of the shooter increases the risk of future school shootings. So the reality is it's a classic case of confession through projection, people accusing you of things that they are in fact guilty of. And that's what this is simply emblematic of. Just as this whole trial has been emblematic of the circus and show trial nature of these legal proceedings for political weaponized purposes, her interaction in this one event is a perfect symbol, a sort of truth in a grain of sand.

1:46:48 to quote Faulkner, of the whole nature of the big media's coverage of this case. No, but I agree, but why would she think she could whole cloth make up something when nothing even was said like that? It was agreed behind chambers it was going to happen, they came out and adjourned for the day. And then she just says, well in court he just said his time, it was a joke, and had to leave because he messed up so bad. I mean, it'd be like if I said five tornadoes hit Austin today and people go look, no tornadoes were even here. It's like, I mean my career would be over And they just do this like constantly. It's gaslighting. It's gaslighting. From the old Broadway play that made the movie that made our popular terminology. That if you constantly tell somebody false news, that they over time believe it just through the act of repetition and your institutional standing. And that it just shows how accustomed they are to it. That she felt so comfortable, so at ease, lying about

1:47:42 the case, that she didn't think there'd be any consequence for her lying about the case until Norm Pattis raised it in court and in a press conference. And then she had to deal with it. Then she had to address it. But otherwise, she probably never would have. because that's what they're used to. The New York Times is used to getting away with it. The federal judges came to their protection in Project Veritas, came to their protection in Sarah Palin's case, came to their protection in the Nicholas Sandman case. So their history of the New York Times is they never suffer consequence when they lie and they libel. And there's nobody more responsible for actual deaths from fake news than the New York Times over the last century, whether you're talking about the Soviet famines,

1:48:25 Whether you're talking about any dumb war needlessly. By the way, take your time, take your time. Soviet famines, they defended Stalin starving millions to death. Not only that, Walter Duranty won a prize for his coverage, for his extraordinary efforts to cover up the scale and scope of people being starved to death in the Soviet Union, often for targeted reasons like the Cossacks and the Kulaks, who he didn't want to have independent political power against his Soviet state. Mass murder, tens of millions of people, covered it up. The New York Times initially helped cover up Pol Pot and Khmer Rouge just like Noam Chomsky did in Cambodia. You show your historical gravitas, it's amazing. There's a bunch of other examples. It's not just WMDs, it's not just babies in incubators to launch the first Iraq war. They are the tip of the spear of fraud.

CHAPTER 26 / 40 Discussion

Courtroom Montage of Judicial Restrictions

A video montage features Judge Bellis repeatedly restricting Alex Jones' testimony in the Connecticut courtroom. The clips show the judge barring Jones from discussing his compliance with discovery or the First Amendment. The segment concludes with Greg Reese reporting that the trial is an assault on alternative media's right to exist.

judge bellis· alex jones· sandy hook· discovery· first amendment· robbie parker

1:53:07 The biggest concern for the judge in the Alex Jones trial is for the jury to see through their deception. So before the jury is allowed in, she clearly reminds Jones how how he's not allowed to defend himself. There are certain areas that your attorney is well aware of as his opposing counsel that are not going to be asked about and cannot be testified about. And I'm more than happy to go over, it's a very short list, and I'm more than happy to go over it with you if you want me to. But if you don't want me to, that's fine too. I'm simply trying to avoid

1:53:43 any issues in front of the jury. I don't want to have any unpleasantness. There's no other way to put it. So that's why I'm willing to do it if you want me to do it, but I don't have to do it. Well, please do judge, because... Okay, that's enough. My lawyers, they told me about the... The yes was enough. That's all I need to know. And the lawyers know not to ask you these questions, so the only way there would be a problem is if you gave a non-responsive answer. So if I just go over it briefly, I don't think we're going to have any problem at all. So the lawyers are not going to ask you about, nor can you offer any testimony about, the plaintiff's settlement with the former defendants, Wolfgang Halbig and Corey Sklanka.

1:54:29 the Soto vs. Bushmaster case and who the plaintiff did not sue. So I understand you may not agree with those rulings and this is just a yes or no answer. Do you understand that you may not testify on those topics? Yes. Okay. So there can be no testimony and there's not going to be any questions obviously regarding the maximum amount of Sandy Hook coverage on your shows or the percentage or proportion of Sandy Hook coverage? Yes or no? Do you understand that that's not testimony that you can offer? You're not going to be asked about it and you can't offer it? Yes. Okay. You may not offer testimony and you're not going to be asked about whether you

1:55:13 substantially complied or you produced everything or that you challenged the basis for the default ruling. All of these issues may be the basis for an appeal, but they're not going to be asked nor can you offer that testimony. Do you understand that? Yes. Okay, finally, the First Amendment is not an issue in this hearing in damages. No one is going to ask you about the First Amendment. This is not the appropriate forum for you to offer that testimony. Do you understand that, sir? Yes. Is there anything that prevents you from understanding what we just talked about? I understand as long as they don't ask those questions.

1:55:55 Right. They're not going to ask you those questions. If they did, I mean, they're officers of the court and they understand the rulings. So they're not going to ask you those questions. After attacking Free Speech Systems' All-American business model, the plaintiffs then focus on a single video that went viral 10 years ago featuring Robbie Parker. This video was played on InfoWars because it was a viral video, which alone made it newsworthy. Once the plaintiffs established that InfoWars played this video, they dramatically introduced an emotional Robbie Parker in the courtroom. The cameras move in for the close-up, shaking with emotion by the mere presence of Alex Jones. For playing a viral video,

CHAPTER 27 / 40 Discussion

Closing Thoughts on the Show Trial Precedent

Robert Barnes and Alex Jones conclude their discussion on the trial, warning that it serves as a "canary in the coal mine" for the future of American justice. They argue that if a "Soviet-style show trial" can be normalized in Connecticut, the same tactics will be used to gut the rights of all political dissidents.

alex jones· robert barnes· soviet union· de-platforming· canary in the coal mine

1:56:42 As far as Alex Jones' crimes, it's not clear what their claim is. But their argument is clear. According to the plaintiffs, alternative media should not exist and should not be allowed to report the news. Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. And you've called this judge a tyrant, correct? Yes. Okay. And you actually use that word a lot with your audience. You call people tyrants, don't you? Only when they act like it. Why don't we talk about cryptocurrency? Because one of the ways that you encourage your audience to give you money

1:57:50 is in cryptocurrency donations, right? Yes. And you have a page on your website that's just for cryptocurrency donations, right? InfoWars.com forward slash crypto. Is that a little advertisement just there? Well, we're fighting the deep state. We need money. All right. This is it. Give crypto fun InfoWars. Sponsor us with Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, right? That will end up as a clip on your show tonight. Your advertisement for your cryptocurrency page. You know, I mean, people want to keep us in the fight. So I hope whoever the big whales are that give us money before keep doing it. We'll just keep mincing money as you're in this courtroom. What are your objections? All right, let's move on. People care about the First Amendment. All right, Robert Barnes, appreciate your time on this live Saturday broadcast. Closing comments on this, because in Texas and in Connecticut, they say we're going to shut him down. That's our mission. But he can't say we're trying to shut him down. And they say we're going to use this against everybody else.

1:58:54 Thank God folks are finally starting to get this because I'm getting buzz everywhere that even mainline liberals are going, whoa, this is dangerous. If they can set the precedent that they can do a show trial in America that even would embarrass the Soviet Union, then they will use it as a precedent And just as the platform, de-platforming of you, which you're also not allowed to talk about in the trial, was the canary in the coal mine as to the intentions of big tech social media censorship control, this case will be used as the template to use against other politically disfavored dissidents in weaponizing the civil and criminal justice system for politicized partisan purposes that will gut the meaning of our

CHAPTER 28 / 40 Discussion

Supreme Court Vaccine Mandate and Big Tech Rulings

Robert Barnes reports on major legal developments, including the U.S. Supreme Court's potential review of religious objections to vaccine mandates under Title VII. He also highlights a significant Fifth Circuit ruling that allows Texans to sue Big Tech platforms for viewpoint discrimination. Additionally, a New York state court has ruled that vaccine mandates for police and firemen were illegal, leading Mayor Eric Adams to sunset private sector mandates.

supreme court· vaccine mandate· title vii· fifth circuit· big tech· texas

1:59:34 of everybody having their day in court. Whatever you think of Alex Jones or InfoWars, everybody's entitled to their day in court, and that's what they're denying you. Anything that even vaguely resembles your day in court. All right, what do you want to hit first? The huge vaccine news, the huge Matt Gaetz frame-up collapses news, the Russia news, World War III news, the inflation news, it all ties together. What do you want to hit first? First, big news. It looks like the U.S. Supreme Court will finally weigh in on the vaccine mandate context, at least as to Title VII and the right to have a religious objection to it. A lot of courts are waiting on the U.S. Supreme Court to say that this, in fact, does violate your rights of religious conscience.

2:00:19 if they are actually going to take the New York case, I think the only reason they would do so is to say that the vaccine mandate violates religious rights under the First Amendment and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and its analogous provisions. So that could be a very big, big decision. And that comes right after the big Fifth Circuit decision just last week, which said now people can sue for big tech social media censorship in Texas. Now, they can get their attorney's fees, they can get certain costs, they can get an injunction, they can get declaratory relief. So that means anybody who gets censored by Google, by YouTube, by Twitter, by Facebook, by Instagram, can now file suit in Texas to get themselves reinstated on those platforms if the basis of their exclusion was viewpoint political discrimination. So that was a huge ruling that hopefully the Supreme Court will affirm if it takes it up

2:01:16 at all. Those are two big rulings. A third ruling in the vaccine mandate case came out yesterday. A state court in New York recognized that the vaccine mandate on firemen and policemen was illegal and was not properly issued, and demanded that those people be reinstated. I met many of them up in New York a couple of months ago. We're seeing some headway in the vaccine mandate context. Even Canada has cases docketed to deal with it. And again, you didn't bring yourself up here, but we need credit where credit is due so folks know who's effective. You were involved at the center of the whistleblower to Robert Kennedy and the lawsuits that have gotten the documents out that are bringing them down right now. Their whole agenda is forced inoculation to control the autonomy of your body, to put into you what they want, so there isn't a more important fight other than stopping nuclear war than anybody's involved in.

2:02:10 And we now, I was there with several senior New York police officers who were in their off time providing security for us. We've used for years. Great people, I won't say who they are, but these are great people. Great military veterans as well. And they told me Thursday, they said, don't announce it yet. And then I got busy and never got to it Friday. They said you can announce it in the morning. But the mayor is backing off forced inoculation in New York. We've just got the word through the police union. And so sure enough, the next morning it broke. Adams to sunset private sector vaccine mandates and not make the police department and the fire department and others take it. I mean, that shows the pressure everybody's put on them. And it's outrageous they got this far, but boy, this is a big victory.

CHAPTER 29 / 40 Discussion

Pfizer Whistleblower Lawsuit and Food Monopolies

Robert Barnes discusses his work with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on a lawsuit against the FDA regarding pediatric vaccines. He also highlights the Brooke Jackson whistleblower suit against Pfizer, which alleges fraud in clinical trials. Barnes mentions his representation of Amish farmer Amos Miller, framing it as a fight against the USDA and Bill Gates' attempts to monopolize the food supply with synthetic alternatives.

pfizer· brooke jackson· robert f. kennedy jr.· fda· amos miller· bill gates

2:02:51 Oh, no doubt. It comes on the eve of the court holding hearings, in my case with Robert Kennedy, against the FDA for trying to force this vaccine on children as young as six months old. More medical data keeps pouring out that the vaccine is causing more injury than it prevents, particularly for young people. And it's causing record levels of excess deaths in certain categories and disability claims in a wide range of categories. So more and more of the evidence continues to accumulate in our favor, predicting what we said would actually be the case with this vaccine, which is not even a vaccine. So Barnes, what comes next? Because you know I do this you do this the listeners do this and I'm not mad at any of us. I'm just frustrated

2:03:35 If your whole life you live just the one thing you've done with your Pfizer lawsuit makes your life heroic and a good thing and positive. I don't think listeners get what they've done supporting you and me. And we all need to kind of not have a victory lap, but just go, whoa, we're hurt, we're bleeding, but man, we're starting to beat some ass here. I mean, you know, we need to realize we've got the initiative right now. Folks need to get all this gloom and doom is terrible. We're exposing it, but it's to wake people up, not to demoralize folks. And that we're winning. Closing comments on that. Oh, yeah, no doubt about it. The Pfizer whistleblower suit for Brooke Jackson is the suit that could unwind all of this and expose Pfizer once and for all. It would be the smart move of President Trump to embrace that suit, to be able to say, you know what, I wanted there to be a safe, effective vaccine. They lied to me. They said it was safe. They said it was effective. They said it was a vaccine. It was none of those things, and support Brooke Jackson's suit against Pfizer

2:04:27 to expose their fraud on the American people. The FDA suit that we're bringing against the FDA with Bobby Kennedy is going to be going to court. And I'm now representing Amos Miller, the Amish farmer, because that's the attempt of the U.S. Department of Agriculture to monopolize control of food and what goes into your body. Food and farming in America. Oh, they're so afraid of micro farms. Oh, completely. I mean, they want Bill Gates' synthetic food. I mean, like he's talking about synthetic corn again the other day. They want synthetic food and Bill Gates' food to be your only permissible diet. Yeah, their anti-climate change food is toxic poison. Let's shift gears into this. This, to me, is huge because I know folks that know Matt Gaetz. Years ago, he's a playboy. He's married now. He's in Congress. Years ago, he's at some parties, young women.

CHAPTER 30 / 40 Discussion

Matt Gaetz DOJ Investigation Collapse

DOJ prosecutors have recommended no charges against Representative Matt Gaetz, citing credibility issues with witnesses in a long-running sex trafficking investigation. Barnes and Jones characterize the investigation as a "Deep State" frame-up intended to derail Gaetz's political career. They contrast the allegations against Gaetz with a recent clip of President Joe Biden making controversial comments about meeting a 12-year-old when he was 30.

matt gaetz· doj· deep state· extortion· joe biden· pedophilia

2:05:15 Now they can't even prove one of them was 17 or 18. How big is it? Because guys, if you're at a party years ago and the women say they're of age and they look like they're 25 and one of them is 17, now they say that whole story's falling apart, none of it's true. They threatened to indict these people that didn't lie about Gates. Matt Gaetz frame-up collapses, DOJ prosecutors recommend no charges due to credibility questions of main witnesses. How big is that? Well, Matt Gaetz is one of the most important spokespersons against the deep state. He was planning on running for statewide office in Florida. And right at that time is when they launched this story and launched this investigation. So what we're seeing is the Biden Justice Department willing to weaponize every tool they have available. But their case was so bad because it's also noteworthy that the person who is trying to entrap and extort Matt Gaetz and his family ultimately pled guilty as well.

2:06:10 So everything Matt Gaetz said from the get-go was true. He said this is a false claim by people trying to extort my family and blackmail my family into a deep state effort to derail my political future. And that's been the case never has. Let's boil it down. They're at an ecstasy party six years ago. They don't even know if Gaetz took it. They're at a party in a hotel. And They then try to claim he's done all these criminal things and they go talk to all the strippers that were there and they say Matt was really nice. We didn't see him take drugs and he left the party early. So he's at a party with a bunch of people partying and now he's guilty of screwing kids. No he's not. This is all a big lie. And again they went to all these women and they said no he didn't even have sex with us.

2:06:58 Well, it was another case of confession through projection because we had the President of the United States yesterday talk on national TV in a televised speech about when he was 30 meeting a girl when she was 12 with the obvious inference being there. So it was confession through projection. I forgot that clip, guys. I sent it to you. I don't see it on my list. It's everywhere. Type in Biden talks about being 30 and meeting a 12-year-old and loving her all the time. We know his second wife, the current first lady, he met when they were 16 and started dating. And again, this is the pedophilia thing. If you're 20 and they're 16, I don't think it's pedophilia. Okay? Going up to 10-year-olds and 5-year-olds, that's pedophilia. Okay? And so they play this game of like, oh, I see these cases where prosecutors go after an 18-year-old because he dates the freshman

2:07:50 who's 14. That's not pedophilia. If someone's a teenager dating a teenager, it's not pedophilia. Pedophilia is an adult going after children. And they go, oh, look, Jones is defending pedophilia. No, I'm not. I've said they should tighten those laws up to explain what's going on here. But I mean, this is just crazy. Here's the Biden clip you're talking about. You gotta say hi to me. We go back a long way. She was 12, I was 30. But anyway, this woman helped me get an awful lot done. Anyway. He's a well-known pedophile. His own daughter says he had sex with him in the diary, which they now admit is real. So again, how big is this Matt Gaetz situation? It was a failed deep state effort. It was an effort by the deep state to take Gaetz out to at least limit his political aspirations and ambitions. He's one of the most effective public spokespersons against the deep state. He has independent family money, so he doesn't need their money for anything. He doesn't need their money for his future career. And that's why they fear him just like Trump.

CHAPTER 31 / 40 Discussion

Independent Media Funding and Matt Gaetz's Future

The discussion focuses on why the "Deep State" fears figures like Matt Gaetz and Alex Jones, attributing it to their independent funding and refusal to take corporate money. Barnes encourages Gaetz to leverage his vindication to rise within the Republican Party alongside Trump and DeSantis. He argues that Gaetz is a unique threat because he is an articulate critic of FBI corruption and international warmongering.

matt gaetz· infowars· deep state· fbi· donald trump· ron desantis

2:08:55 Exactly. Just like they ultimately feared John Kennedy. I mean, when you have people who don't need your money for power, for prestige, for prosperity, then they are always a threat to your control. That's why they hate Infowars. I'm not a Bob Kennedy, but I have the Lister support. They fear any independent operation that has money. Exactly. What's unique about Infowars is it is entirely an audience-supported network that doesn't have any corporate sugar daddies, big pharma, big advertisers. That's how the institutional media stays co-opted. That's how they stay bought off, propagating a message that serves the interests of big ag, big pharma, big industry, the military-industrial complex. The uniqueness of Infowars is not only its populist message,

2:09:43 but it's populist method of organization and support. The people make it function. The people make it perform. And that's what's different. I mean, that's why people go to Infowarsstore.com, buy a product that they like, What's amazing is watching this trial, where they try to make it sound bad, that rather than pimp out products you have no idea about from big pharma that you have reason to believe could hurt people and harm people, you instead put out products that you believe in, that you've personally vetted, that you believe will make people healthier and wealthier and wiser over time. So it's extraordinary. This is the model to use. It's a model that is not corrupted by advertiser dollars.

2:10:25 It's also a model that promotes products you can believe in, that you think will make people better, make people healthier, make people wealthier, just by going to Infowarsstore.com and substituting in something they're buying from the Amazons, something they're buying from the big pharmas, something they're buying from big medicine, something they're buying from big ag. and buy it in a way that's made in a way they can have confidence in, they can believe in, they can trust, and do so at a level that's often cheaper and more affordable than comparable competitors, and that makes their life healthier in the process. That's right, the system is afraid of our own infrastructure. So let me ask you this, I wanna be clear. If I found out Trump was on planes with 12 year old girls or 15 year old girls, I would go to war with him. But he never was, he's not on the flight logs.

2:11:14 He didn't fly to Epstein Island. And the left just keeps lying and saying that if Trump did, I would go after him. But the Clintons and all these big tech people and Hollywood people did. And so they keep trying to make it about Trump and change the subject. But it's the federal courts and Democratic judges blocking the release of the Johns. I say release it. And if Trump's on that list, and we can prove it, then put him in prison. But that we know that's not there. So again, oh, Trump's screwing kids. Well, no, it's like 30-year-old hookers and he apologized for it. But he's not a pedophile. It's the same thing with Matt Gaetz. I read the indictments, I read the articles, they went and canvassed all these parties, all these places Matt Gaetz went to, they couldn't find anything. So they made this up. Where do you think Gaetz goes from here now that he's being vindicated? Because I think he should sue the media that called him a pedophile and sue the Democrats that did this.

2:12:07 Well, at a minimum, he should utilize this to get back into the game on a broader and bigger scale because he had kind of receded a little bit from the court of public opinion, did not pursue statewide office in Florida. I hope he gets closer to the Trump machine, the Trump apparatus, as well as the DeSantis apparatus, and he should be elevated within the Republican Party in terms of public prominence. because he's a critical and essential voice against deep state politics and a critical and essential voice for populism. He's calling for reform of the FBI, where a lot of other ranking Republicans are cowering in hiding. Well, yeah, let's talk about why they were so afraid of Matt Gaetz.

2:12:44 He's one of the most important influential critics of FBI corruption, deep state collusion, international warmongering, bad trade policy, woke media, and corrupt culture. He's one of the loudest and most consistent critics on all of those things—an outspoken person unfazed by by any aspect of the corruption of Washington or of Wall Street. And because his family has independent money, he doesn't need them for his campaign financing. He doesn't need them for his personal wellbeing. He doesn't need this for his political future. And that makes him a unique threat to the deep state. His willingness, readiness and means of fighting them is someone that poses probably the biggest congressional threat to deep state prerogatives.

2:13:31 He's also well-spoken, very articulate, has a good presentation. That's what they try to use against him. They try to use the perception of his personality and popularity of his personality somehow meant something bad and nefarious. So it was all a hit job. It was all a smear job. It was all bogus criminalized lawfare. And it's all failed. The people who are trying to extort him are going to prison. He He, they're not even bringing charges because there was no grounds for the charges to be brought in the first place. So it's a complete vindication of Matt Gaetz. And I hope he leverages this to continue to rise within the Republican Party. President Trump should incorporate him more often in public presentations and as part of his campaign team. Then Trump is less likely to make bad decisions along the way. I totally agree. So let's raise this in closing at the Russia News and let you go. You've done a great job, Robert Barnes.

CHAPTER 32 / 40 Discussion

Child Pornography Planting Allegations in Discovery

Alex Jones recounts a courtroom exchange where attorney Chris Mattei allegedly misrepresented discovery findings. Jones explains that among 280,000 emails turned over, some contained unsolicited links to illegal content, which the FBI confirmed Jones never opened. He accuses Mattei of using these "secret embedded links" to smear him before the jury despite his innocence. Barnes suggests this may be another instance of "projection" by the prosecution.

chris mattei· discovery· fbi· child pornography· young turks· projection

2:14:25 You watch the trial, I don't know if you caught this part, you covered most of it live and it was viral. Chris Maddy, the Democratic Party operative, literally gets up there over an hour and brings up how we gave them total discovery, which we're not allowed to say we gave them discovery, of the 280-something thousand emails with key search terms they gave. Weeks after they filed suit on us in 2018, We're sent a bunch of emails saying, I want to get you, I want to hurt you, we're going to kill you, Alex Jones, for Sandy Hook. And embedded, because we're not tech people, there are secret embedded links, just links to child porn. So we turn the email over, they know how to scan them and magically find the secret links. And then Chris Maddy gets up there and says, okay, you filed a lawsuit against the Young Turks that you filed. Just get them to stop saying I'm a child pornographer and all this.

2:15:22 He said, yeah, it's true. The FBI said you didn't do anything. It was sent to you. You didn't open it. But then an hour later he says, so you did send child porn. Let's just admit it, you did it. So he wanted to cover himself earlier, knowing for clips on the internet, they would later say it. I said, wait, you just said earlier I was innocent. So imagine the evil of that. to know how to secretly find secret embedded invisible images. I'm not saying he did it. He said I said that. I didn't say that. So I offered him a reward. I didn't say Chris Manning did that. I just said it's very suspicious. And then at the end, he comes out an hour later and says the jury, he sent child porn to the families. Man, I mean,

2:16:05 This is unbelievable. These people are unbelievable, Robert. They had to use high-tech systems, we're told, to scan 280,000 emails and they scanned them and then they reported us to the FBI for the information. The FBI said we're not guilty because we never opened it. This doesn't look too good. I have no doubt. And the other thing is he brought up our suit, the suit that I filed against the Young Turks and others who falsely reported the initial news on this based on the misleading information being put out by the plaintiffs' firm. And it was interesting. He didn't tell the whole story. He didn't tell the part that the Young Turks—the reason why the suit didn't go forward—the Young Turks retracted. The other people involved that got sued retracted. The

2:16:51 Unlike the plaintiff's lawyers in this case, you weren't going to go forward against people who admitted they made a mistake and withdrew the statement. Now, for some reason, they left my phone number and address on the screen because they started getting all these messages saying, by the way, we can see it too. So office marketing, they've been obsessed with me for whatever weird reason from the get-go. But it shows the nature of their unwillingness to have the truth come out. That's why they have to rig a trial. You don't have to rig a trial if you're on the side of truth. You don't have to rig a trial if you're on the side of justice.

2:17:30 You have to rig a trial when both are against you. And that's exactly what they're trying to do. Exactly, but I'll just say this. How do you get 280 something thousand emails and then scan them for secret links? And then they find, I mean, it just, it doesn't sound good. Well, there was a lot of concern at the time as to what the source of this was and whether it was somebody aligned with the plaintiff's lawyers, allied with the plaintiff's lawyers. Uh, whoever said it was attacking us for Sandy Hook in it. Yeah, exactly. They sought information that was guaranteed to produce stuff that you didn't even know existed, emails you would never even open. I would note your lawyers objected on the grounds that this was a crazily invasive and overbroad discovery request, and the court compelled it. The court forced you to turn over anything, even if it was in your spam box, you had to turn it over.

2:18:25 That's how invasive the discovery was. You did massive searches on your entire computer for anything with any term the judge said you had to give the plaintiff's lawyers. Then when information turns up on there that you'd never seen before, they blame you for it. Of course, there were going to be questions raised about whether or not they were complicit at all about how that information got there in the first place. They may be totally innocent. They may They may not be, but the whole truth won't be, will never come out. But what that truth shows is that in fact, you completely complied with discovery, so much so that you even produced junk email you got sent in the process. Well, let's expand on that in closing and then we'll hit the Russia thing, and then we'll close out the interview. I was never really sure about what was going on until he waited like 45 minutes, an hour, and then said, but you did send child porn and looked at the jury.

2:19:22 And I was like, oh my God, you just did it. He did it right there. He did it right there. Well, and he completely misrepresented your public presentation about that. What you said was whoever sent that child point information, you would like to have outed. And so I said, whoever did it a million dollars, and then he spun it that I said he was doing it. Is this the P word again? Projection? That's always a possibility. I mean, you can't rule it out. I'm not saying he did that. He's a nice person.

2:20:00 I mean, yeah, I mean, who knows? All I know is that he completely misrepresented at the time how that came about and he misrepresented in court your public presentation. He made it sound like you stuck his photo up and pointed to it and said you wanted his head on a stake. All false. That's all false. That's just a lie. It's just one more lie. I don't think Maddie sent me that. We didn't say that at the time. All I know is the whole thing's disgusting. All right, five minutes. I'm giving you the floor. Because I don't want to interrupt you. You're a political expert, you're also a geopolitical expert. You've been very accurate on the Russia situation. 300,000 troops called up, threats of nuclear war, Putin says he's not bluffing. I'm not picking sides here. I'm saying this is an escalation that leads to really bad things. Your take on the Russia situation.

CHAPTER 33 / 40 Discussion

Russian Annexation Referendums and China Coup Rumors

Russia is holding referendums in occupied Ukrainian regions to formally annex them, which would classify any further Ukrainian attacks as attacks on Russian soil. Meanwhile, unconfirmed rumors circulate regarding a "palace coup" in China against Xi Jinping, fueled by sudden flight cancellations and unusual military movements. Barnes notes that the West's economic war on Russia has largely failed, leading to a fuel and food crisis in Europe.

russia· ukraine· donbass· xi jinping· china· palace coup

2:20:46 Yeah, they're holding referendums in all the regions occupied by Russia. Ukraine has said that anybody who participates in those elections will go to prison if Ukraine ever takes back over, basically guaranteeing that Russia will win each of those referendums. And so what will happen is those regions will become part of Russia under Russian law within a week or so. And that means any attack on it will be considered an attack on Russia. That is a complete escalation. And the partial mobilization is 300,000. that would more than double their troop presence that's currently occupying the regions in the Donbass and the southern regions north of Crimea and Crimea. Putin made it clear because some NATO people were saying, you know what, he won't use nuclear weapons and maybe we can. He made it clear that if you go any further, nuclear weapons will be used to defend the country. The problem is the West refuses to back down.

2:21:44 The other thing Putin pointed out in his speech is that Ukraine had agreed to a deal in Istanbul all the way back at the very beginning of this, and then the British and the Biden administration told him to not do it. And that's the only reason why there wasn't a peace deal from the get-go. All kinds of lives could have been saved. All kinds of treasure could have been salvaged had we not interfered in that peace negotiation. Now we don't know what's going on in China. Flights are being canceled. Rumors of whether there's an old-fashioned palace coup going on, we don't know. Iran has protests. They're shutting down the internet.

2:22:24 They're repressing, trying to repress those protests after their morality police killed somebody for not complying with Sharia law. So, I mean, we're seeing all of this sort of explosion of political turmoil and we're distracted by this continuous escalation of a needless conflict, as President Trump has repeatedly said, with Russia over Ukraine. The parts of Ukraine that want to be part of Russia should have should just allow that to be part of Russia, end the dispute, finish it, go on. There's no reason for continued backfiring economic sanctions that are going to induce a great reset agenda in the Western world. The pound has dropped to the lowest level in 40, 50 years. The euro has dropped to one of the lowest levels it's ever been. They're having a fuel crisis in Europe. They're having a food crisis in Europe. That food crisis is expanding to other parts of the world.

2:23:16 The net effect of this is going to be really ugly, that the West war on Russia has failed. Even Henry Kissinger has acknowledged this. It's time to do as Trump suggested, do a deal, cut a peace deal, get out. So if we look at what's happening in China, the relevant and pertinent issues are, has there been a change of the guard? So at this point, it's just rumors. But some of the rumors were reinforced by sudden flight cancellations in different places and unusual military action.

CHAPTER 34 / 40 Discussion

China Real Estate Bubble and Social Unrest

China is facing a massive real estate bubble, with one in four citizens employed in the construction sector and many life savings tied to unoccupied "ghost towns." This economic instability is compounded by extreme "zero-COVID" lockdowns and a severe drought affecting hydropower. Barnes describes the Chinese real estate market as a "Ponzi scheme" that is currently collapsing.

china· real estate· evergrande· ghost towns· covid lockdowns· hydropower

2:23:54 The rumor is that there has been a palace coup and Xi, who was up for a re-election to party leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, was replaced. Now at this point, this is coming from unreliable sources, sources that don't have definite access to inside information. Constant problem in China. A bigger, broader problem in China, aside from Taiwan and the attempts of the Biden administration to provoke a military conflict over Taiwan, are two internal controversial set of issues and policies. One is more and more pushback by the Chinese people, public, and populace against the extreme no-COVID lockdown policies that are not only infringing upon people's core abilities to practice their everyday life, but is also badly impairing their economic well-being and supply chain at a time. This goes to the second issue.

2:24:52 They have a range of water issues throughout the country that are implicating their power source, because hydropower is the primary source of their power. It's coming at a bad time with the supply chain issues because they have a huge real estate bubble that makes the American real estate bubble of 2008 look tiny by comparison. One out of four Chinese are employed by the real estate economy directly or indirectly. One out of three steel workers are actually working for the construction industry and the real estate industry. What China did is they had their people build excess capital and created artificial internal spending on real estate boom that was unsupported by core economics. So you had people, that's why they had these ghost towns, these huge whole complexes, whole created cities, whole towns, whole suburbs,

2:25:44 all unoccupied with one high rise after the other. Many of these having built may be knocked down because they were made so shoddy and cheap. And it was almost pyramid scheme-ish. almost Ponzi scheme-ish, that the whole belief was, well, real estate had always gone up for 30 years in China, so surely it would keep going up for 30 years in China. So people sunk their life savings in second, third, fourth properties, in properties they could not rent out because the value of the property was often as much as 10 times higher on a monthly basis. Then was, it was their mortgage payment, was often 10 times higher than they could possibly get rent for.

CHAPTER 35 / 40 Discussion

US Economic Outlook and BlackRock Housing Monopoly

Financial experts like Carl Icahn and Stanley Druckenmiller predict a 20% to 50% drop in the stock and real estate markets. The Federal Reserve's interest rate hikes are expected to double mortgage costs, leading to the lowest rate of home ownership in decades. Barnes warns that firms like BlackRock are vacuuming up single-family homes to implement a "woke" ESG agenda and transform the US into a renter society.

federal reserve· inflation· housing market· blackrock· esg· carl icahn

2:26:24 That's a sign that anybody that knows the real estate economy of a complete bubble. And Robert, that's my next point. I don't get into all this esoteric, oh the 24th of September, the world ends, all this stuff. We're not saying that. But Russia and nuclear war and the economy and the Ponzi scheme in China with real estate coming to an end, the stock market plunging last week. and FedEx saying the economy's flatlining. I mean, I don't think there's any denial that we're in for some very insane times. In closing, what does your research tell you is about to happen? The economy is definitely going to take a tank. I mean, the Federal Reserve came out and said unless there's massive more unemployment and economic pain of the ordinary person, they're going to refuse to do anything but raise rates. That means the real estate economy is predicted by some well-respected experts to fall 50% within the next two years. People will not be able to afford a home. And that will impact the entire home build construction industry here in the United States. Both Stanley Drunkenmiller and Carl Icahn, two prominent members

2:27:22 Members of Wall Street have said that the economy is going to tank from a 20 to 50 percent drop in the various stock and real estate and other markets that you were used, particularly the housing market, was used for the consumer spending. which our entire economy is predicated upon when we shifted away from mania. And again, I'm no rocket scientist, but I said that I bought a very expensive house four years ago thinking it would double. I sold it six, seven months ago. My wife said, why are you doing this? I said, it was an investment to fund InfoWars. I put the money in InfoWars. And she's like, wow, you're right. She sees family with rent houses she has plunging in value around the country. And again, I could just see where this was going. I'm not an expert. I could see it How bad do you think it's going to get here in the United States?

2:28:04 It's going to get bad. We may have the lowest rate of home ownership in decades. That's the path that's going on. People will not be able to afford a home. Your average mortgage has doubled in price since Biden took over. Doubled. So within two years, your average person has had to pay twice as much for the same home as they did under Donald Trump. And notice it's BlackRock is vacuuming up all the $200,000 to $500,000 houses in key areas for regular working families. They're planning something big. No doubt. BlackRock is deeply embedded in China. You look at where BlackRock is deeply embedded in these ESG policies that are meant to culturally use corporate power to take over and implement a cultural leftist, wokish agenda and enforce it on ordinary people.

2:28:51 Their power is way out of pale. I mean, they make the big trusts. They make the Rockefellers and the Robber Barons and the Morgans and the Rothschilds look like small change, the scale and size of their global economic footprint. That's how big BlackRock is and has been too little attention paid to what they're up to. All right, final question. Final question. I appreciate all your time. And then plug your great show with Viva Frye and the rest of it, Robert. 45 days out from the midterm, they say all Republicans are terrorists, anybody that challenges us are terrorists. There's imminent terror attacks. I see them priming a false flag, a provocative event. Can you speak to that and then other tricks the deep state might play?

CHAPTER 36 / 40 Discussion

Midterm Election Predictions and October Surprise Fears

Robert Barnes predicts a Republican sweep in the upcoming midterm elections but warns of a potential "October Surprise," such as a major escalation in the war with Russia or China. He notes the ongoing legal targeting of figures like Steve Bannon and Mike Lindell. Alex Jones announces that Dr. Judy Mikovits will appear on the Sunday show to discuss the collapse of the COVID narrative.

midterms· steve bannon· mike lindell· october surprise· russia· judy mikovits

2:29:34 I think the great concern is they'll continue to weaponize the legal system so that you see Steve Bannon indicted again in New York, you see President Trump having to face a bogus Connecticut suit, as well as the crazy criminal case that they're looking at. You're seeing Mike Lindell have to hire Alan Dershowitz to sue the FBI because they're trying to go after him related to him exposing election fraud in 2020. So you're seeing this constant escalation that ultimately failed when they tried to take out Matt Gaetz, but they may want to escalate even further. The only restraint right now is they're under the mistaken impression that that Democrats are in good place for the midterms. They're wrong. Republicans are going to sweep key governors' races, key Senate races, key House races. The question is, if they ever come to that recognition that that's going to happen, will we get a horrendous October surprise? Will we get a Halloween for the ages? Will we get war with Russia or war with China? Will we get global conflict?

2:30:31 that could be extraordinarily dangerous. Will we get emergency? Well, I mean, I think you already said it. We're getting war with Russia. I mean, it's Russia's doing the national draft, threatening nuclear war. I mean, I think that's what's going to happen. That's a definite risk. And we have to be on a constant alert for that risk and to push back against it in the court of public opinion. Because the whole game, as both plaintiffs' lawyers have admitted in both cases in both states, The whole goal was to take Infowars off the air, to prevent it from being heard. Because I always tell people free speech is mostly about my right to listen to what I want, not just my right to speak, not just anyone else's right to speak. Yeah, and let me clarify. I'm not saying we're gonna have nuclear war, but we're gonna have a massive escalation in the Russian war, and I don't see how that doesn't escalate. I mean, it's just an incredible position to be in. You have all the insider trading by the Democrats. They just seem to be

2:31:22 out of control, thinking there's no checks and balances on them. I mean, they're trying to put the former president of the United States in prison. I mean, you couldn't get... That's never happened in America before. They're re-prosecuting Steve Bannon on charges he was pardoned for after prosecuting him on bogus contempt charges in the District of Columbia. We cannot point to any other time in American history outside of parts of World War I where there was such an over-open weaponization of the legal system against political dissidents. And this is going after people that they didn't even go after in World War I. They went after Eugene V. Debs. You're right, a historic moment. Robert Barnes, you always do a great job. You host a lot of great shows, did great coverage of the show trial. We'll have more coverage next week of my show trial. I go back to Connecticut Tuesday and Wednesday. I'll do Monday, Thursday, and Friday. How do people tune in and find your show? Absolutely. They can get all the content at vivabarneslaw.locals.com. That's where they can get all the curated content, all the coverage. Say the URL again.

2:32:22 AvivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com. All right, Robert, thanks for the time. Talk to you soon. Absolutely. Powerful. All right, I'm going to go to break, play some key clubs, and then I'm going to come back and hit final statements on where we're at. We're going to reloop this live show until 4 p.m. tomorrow with my live Sunday show. And I've announced I got Dr. Judy Minkovitz in studio, and I'm hosting all four hours tomorrow night, 4 to 8 p.m. Central Standard Time. We've got so much. We'll take your phone calls, special guests in studio, and so much more.

2:32:58 But man, I mean, it's hard to estimate how dangerous this Russia situation is. I mean, this is crazy. All right, I've got some other news I want to hit on the economy and on super mega cities in the new world order. When we come back, we got another 27 minutes left of this live transmission. Stay with us. This program contains language and sequences some viewers may find disturbing. The nation and all of our freedoms hang by a thread. And the military apparatus of this country is about to be handed over to scum! For beholden to scum! Russian scum! Please listen. If you don't, if you won't...

CHAPTER 37 / 40 Discussion

Invasion of the Body Snatchers and Media Criticism

A dramatic montage uses clips from "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" to symbolize the perceived takeover of society by globalist forces. The segment transitions into a critique of CNN, with Alex Jones labeling the network the "enemy of the truth." The host frames the current political climate as a struggle against a "parasitic" elite that demands total compliance.

invasion of the body snatchers· cnn· bill gates· propaganda· resistance

2:33:53 If you fail to understand, then the same incredible terror that's menacing me will strike at you! The function of all life is survival. Sleep. Sleep. Sleep. Oh my God! Oh my God! Oh my God! Lock the door! They're coming! They're coming! Help! Help! They're coming! They're coming! Listen to me! Now he's a fresh out of the sky. Please, you're next! We're in danger! Please listen to me! It's something terrible! You're next! They're already here! You're next! They're coming! They're coming! Sleep. The seed is planted. Sleep.

2:34:36 Sleep. Terror grows. Elizabeth, wake up! We'll get you when you sleep! Sit up! Invasion of the body snatchers. All of a sudden, they're growing like parasites. Is it contagious? It looked right at me. You need to get out! They're looking at it as if it was human. It was not human. Now, the classic fear begins to grow. We're being cornered! In a modern masterpiece of science fiction. They're barricading the street. Invasion of the body snatchers. If you are receiving this transmission, you are the resistance. It's Alex Jones.

2:35:49 So I would say, you know, if anything that's happening at CNN and anybody who buys your book, it's really just one of those things that is dividing our nation. And I don't believe in dividing our nation. It hurts our great nation. And so CNN is really the enemy of the truth. And that's my opinion. Thank you. No American is an enemy of another American. No news outlet is an enemy of America. No news out what is an enemy of America. You came in peace. No news out what is an enemy of America. Bill Gates wants you. Take the vaccine. Don't run. CNN's your friend. This is CNN. The Facebook Sermon.

CHAPTER 38 / 40 Discussion

Nuclear MAD Doctrine and Paul Harvey's Devil

Alex Jones discusses the "Mutually Assured Destruction" (MAD) doctrine, warning that modern Russian missiles can reach US cities in five minutes and cannot be shot down. The segment features the famous Paul Harvey "If I Were the Devil" monologue, which describes the subversion of churches, families, and nations as a blueprint for societal collapse.

paul harvey· nuclear war· mad doctrine· mach 9· mach 5· morality

2:37:26 When you have U.S. senators in both parties saying, we may need to go ahead and nuke Russia first, and the Russians are aware that's almost happened before, what do you think that makes the Russians do? Well, it makes them go into war mode. So I don't like them invading Ukraine. I don't like him putting his nuclear forces on maximum alert, only one level above that on their DEFCON, just like our system, and that's fire the weapons. And so now we have Democrats all over the news saying, let's just use nuclear weapons on Russia. Think of their ignorance. Russia has hundreds of submarines off our coast with sea-launched missiles that would vaporize our cities within five minutes on average of being launched. Sea-launched cruise missiles that fly at Mach 5.

2:38:15 land launch systems they can also launch from ships that are at Mach 9 and cannot be shot down. And yes, the United States has those too. That's a Pentagon lie that Russia developed systems that we don't have. It's on record the U.S. has those systems. The point is it's called mutually assured destruction or MAD for a reason because anyone that would violate the MAD doctrine is insane. And you know, I'm on the side of not having a nuclear war. Especially when Russia is not starting a fight with us and especially after we just heard for years that everything happening in this country is run by Russia when that was all a giant lie. The globalists are the outside evil force. Hello Americans, I'm Paul Harvey. If I were the devil, if I were the prince of darkness, I'd want to engulf the whole world in darkness and I'd have a third of its real estate and four-fifths of its population but I wouldn't be happy until I had seized the ripest apple on the tree. The

2:39:15 So I'd set about however necessary to take over the United States. President Kennedy has been seriously wounded by this shooting. I'd subvert the churches first. I'd begin with a campaign of whispers. With the wisdom of a serpent, I would whisper to you as I whispered to Eve. Do as you please. To the young, I would whisper that the Bible is a myth. I would convince them that man created God instead of the other way around. I would confide that what's bad is good and what's good is square. And the old, I would teach to pray after me. Our father, which art in Washington. And then I'd get organized. I'd educate authors in how to make lurid literature exciting so that anything else would appear dull and uninteresting. I'd threaten TV with dirtier movies and vice versa. I'd peddle narcotics to whom I could. I'd sell alcohol to ladies and gentlemen of distinction. I'd tranquilize the rest with pills.

2:40:06 If I were the devil, I'd soon have families at war with themselves, churches at war with themselves, and nations at war with themselves, until each in its turn was consumed. And with promises of higher ratings, I'd have mesmerizing media fanning the flames. The president of the United States is racist. If I were the devil, I would encourage schools to refine young intellects, but neglect the discipline of emotions, gentlemen, those Within a decade, I'd have prisons overflowing, I'd have judges promoting pornography. Soon I could evict God from the courthouse, then from the schoolhouse, and then from the houses of Congress. And in his own churches, I would substitute psychology for religion. I would lure priests and pastors into misusing boys and girls and church money. If I were the devil, I'd take from those who have and give to those who wanted until I had killed the incentive of the ambitious.

CHAPTER 39 / 40 Discussion

MegaCities and the Endgame Film Analysis

Alex Jones revisits his 2007 film "Endgame," which predicted the creation of "MegaCities" as prison-like control grids. He points to current projects in Saudi Arabia and the Netherlands as evidence that this plan is being implemented. Jones argues that these compact cities are designed to facilitate total surveillance and the elimination of private property through carbon taxes and land seizures.

endgame· megacities· saudi arabia· netherlands· carbon tax· global enslavement

2:41:03 I would caution against extremes. I'm here to warn people, you keep telling me to shut up! This isn't a game! In hard work, in patriotism, in moral conduct, I would convince the young that marriage is old-fashioned, that swinging is more fun, that what you see on TV is the way to be. And thus I could undress you in public, and I could lure you into bed with diseases for which there is no cure. In other words, if I were the devil, I'd just keep right on doing what he's doing. Now you know the rest of the story. All right, we got about 15 minutes left in this live broadcast like I told you tomorrow night 4 p.m. I'm gonna kick off. Dr. Judy Minkovits is gonna be in studio with us with huge news. I tend to also take hours of phone calls and just flesh all this out. I don't have words to describe how serious the Russia situation is. I don't think you need me to tell you that but total mobilization, total war. It's just an incredible moment to be alive, but it is a tale of two cities.

2:42:22 It is the best of times, it is the worst of times right now. But I wanted to hit MegaCities here for you because in the film Endgame, in fact maybe we should end the broadcast today with the first six, seven minutes of Endgame. You can find it still, they took down the versions with tens of millions of views but one had like 80 million views off of YouTube and off of Google and all the rest of it. But go find an Endgame clip. We probably have Endgame in our computer. And I explained mega cities, cutting off all the other resources and surrounding areas, how they would launch this somewhere between 2020 and 2030. People are like, oh my gosh, how'd he know? Because they wrote about it and they talked about it and they prepared it.

2:43:07 So let's share the first five, six minutes, six minutes or so of endgame blueprint for global enslavement. And it just starts getting into mega cities. But here it is in Saudi Arabia, in Dubai, in the Netherlands, they're all announcing these mega cities where they tax you and regulate you unless you move into them. Where they take over the farmland everywhere and build these compact control grids Everybody else will be tax controlled, dominated, but inside these grids if you're let in, well you'll be given special treatment. So this is the new system, the new class system that's being created. The Netherlands, a group of institutional investors are planning the construction of a tri-state city to get around nation states on three borders, just like CERN is. A megapolis with a population around 45 million extending across

2:44:01 The Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. For this to happen, they obviously need to buy up a lot of farmland, which they are now taking over. And they exempt themselves from their SCGs, their carbon taxes, and they get all the power. Now ask yourself why they want to build this. Why would we want to live in a 45 million other people? They want to move us where we're easiest to control. Mega cities. These are planned in several continents. Keep asking why. So mega cities are the big topic in 2022, but it's all in the seminal film, Endgame, Blueprint for Global Enslavement. And by the way, it helped keep us on air. We sold 100,000 copies of Endgame last year. Most of them were sold at like $5. But I hope you go to mfulworkstore.com to have the DVD, make copies, share it, have the archive, load it on hard drives, because it's the seminal work. It's

2:44:58 the film version of The Great Reset and The War for the World, the number one book off and on the last few weeks in the world. Get a signed copy exclusively at mfulwarrestore.com and know you're funding a revolution against tyranny, not just here but worldwide. Buy the book at regular price at mfulwarrestore.com as well. And I don't know why in-game is $24.95 because I was selling as low as $5, but I'll have them on Monday bring it back down to like $5 because people really want the film. It's not the crew's fault. You want to sell in, just reverse its full price. But if you want to support us, hell go buy for $24 right now. And then don't forget, we have the Teddy Roosevelt

CHAPTER 40 / 40 Discussion

Global Goalkeeper Award and North American Union

Melinda French Gates presents the 2022 Global Goalkeeper Award to EU head Ursula von der Leyen, which Jones interprets as a meeting of "eugenicists" and "psychotic killers." The segment transitions into clips from "Endgame" discussing the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, and the planned North American Union as steps toward a one-world government.

melinda gates· ursula von der leyen· european union· bilderberg· north american union

2:49:03 Giving a little speech, 55 seconds, here it is. For the tireless work she's doing to help steer the world through COVID-19, for being an extraordinary champion for global health, and for the immeasurable inspiration she provides to girls and women around the world, including me. I am thrilled to present the 2022 Global Goalkeeper Award to a remarkable leader of our time, Ursula von der Leyen. That's the head of the European Union and you see that rainbow swastika.

2:49:52 That's the symbol of the Great Reset and the Bilderberg Group and their spokesperson Klaus Schwab and the WEF. So, literally cutting off Europe, literally pushing forced inoculations. Any questions whether Melinda French Gates is a globalist are absolutely destroyed by that. These are eugenicists, these are depopulationists, these are psychotic killers of the very worst magnitude there is. All right, I'm going to end the broadcast. with the first eight, nine minutes of in-game Blueprint for Global Enslavement that is free and that is online everywhere. Just search it out, share it. It's trademark and copyright free. Just save it and get it out.

2:50:40 where we talk about the mega cities, we talk about the new world order. Here's just the first six, seven, eight minutes of it. We're going to end this live show. It's going to reloop until 4 p.m. tomorrow. Tell everybody you know, tune in. I cannot stress to you enough that we're winning. We're so close to winning, but it's like we're 51% to 49 right now. We're barely winning right now is the critical juncture. Want to thank the crew. Want to commend them for the great job they've done. We have the DVD of Endgame available with a bunch of stickers that come with it as well. But this is the seminal film to have in your archives. So it's a fundraiser. If you want to get it for the price it is, that's great. I'm going to remember. We only have a few thousand copies left, I'm told. But very soon I'll put out a special printing of them if we have the money and try to sell them for near to cost so more people can get it. But this film is the blueprints of the Death Star. It exposes the New World Order. Here's the intro to it and the megacities.

2:51:41 I appeared before the Congressional Committee to tell what I knew of activities which might lead to an attempt to set up a fascist dictatorship. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society. And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings. President Bush signed a formal agreement that will end the United States as we know it. And he took the step without approval from either the U.S. Congress or the people of the United States. The secret organizations of the world power elite are no longer secret. It's known as the Bilderberg Group. Could their objective be world domination? I'm Jim Tucker. I've chased Bilderberg for 30 years. I'll never give up the chase.

2:52:42 Billiard plan for the whole world is nothing less than world government. I'm not comfortable with that at all. Who elected these guys to run the planet? They are the elitist. They feel they should run the world for their own selfish interests. Now we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order. Bilderberg is making great progress toward a world government, and only an educated and informed public can stop them in their tracks. David Miller admits in his own memoirs that he wants to destroy the United States. He's a traitor! It's good to be back at the Council on Foreign Relations. As Pete mentioned, I've been a member for a long time and was actually a director for some period of time. I never mentioned that when I was campaigning for re-election back home in Wyoming.

2:53:40 Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories. I need you to move off the property, please. Some shots were fired. There's bill diverters right there. The Trans-Texas Corridor is a vital part because we stop here in Texas. We stop the new world order right here in Texas. This thing started here. And to save this country, we kill this damn thing here. There is a chance for the President of the United States to carry out a phrase his father used, and that is a new world order.