Wednesday, 4 March 2026

FULL FUENTES-JONES INTERVIEW 3/3/26: Trump Admin Pushes Ground Invasion Of Iran To Ensure Regime Change

The Trump administration abandons its non-interventionist mandate as Senate leaders bypass Congress to facilitate a massive military escalation and forced regime change in Tehran.

By The Alex Jones Show | 1h 53m listen | 28 chapters
FULL FUENTES-JONES INTERVIEW 3/3/26: Trump Admin Pushes Ground Invasion Of Iran To Ensure Regime Change cover

About this episode

Donald Trump claims he forced the hand of Israeli leadership to launch preemptive strikes against Iran, a move critics suggest is a calculated attempt to frame military escalation as a defensive necessity. Senator Marco Rubio and JD Vance have emerged as primary defenders of this interventionist shift, while an executive emergency order regarding the Strait of Hormuz effectively functions as an unofficial declaration of war. This pivot toward a ground invasion marks a total departure from the non-interventionist promises of the 2016 campaign.

Senate Leader John Thune asserts the White House possesses full authority to bypass Congress for Middle Eastern operations, signaling a transition from denuclearization goals to total regime change. Nick Fuentes argues that the administration is being psychologically manipulated by advisors to pursue a Greater Israel agenda, citing the deployment of U.S. aircraft carriers as a provocation tactic. Meanwhile, the FBI and Pentagon are reportedly conducting national security dragnets against American activists like General Flynn and Alex Jones rather than addressing foreign threats. Reports also indicate that insurance companies have halted coverage in the Suez Canal following Iranian retaliatory strikes on merchant vessels.

Alex Jones expresses heartbreak over the administration's direction, admitting he is searching for a political off-ramp as the GOP establishment marginalizes America First figures like Thomas Massie. Nick Fuentes proposes a corrective strategy of voting for Democrats in the 2026 midterms to punish the Republican Party for its perceived betrayal on the Epstein files and the Iran conflict. The discussion concludes with a warning that a failed Iranian state would create a humanitarian crisis of 90 million people, dwarfing the disasters in Syria and Libya.


CHAPTER 01 / 28 Discussion

Donald Trump, Israel, and the Potential for War with Iran

Donald Trump claims he may have forced Israel's hand regarding military strikes against Iran to prevent a perceived imminent attack. Critics argue that the presence of U.S. aircraft carriers and warships makes an Iranian first strike unlikely, suggesting the narrative is being constructed to hedge against future political fallout. Senator Marco Rubio and JD Vance are identified as supporters of this interventionist stance, potentially positioning themselves for the 2028 presidential election.

donald trump· israel· iran· marco rubio· jd vance· strait of hormuz· qasem soleimani

00:00 force your hand to launch these strikes against Iran? Did that knock the whole United States into this war? No, I might have forced their hands. You see, we were having negotiations with these lunatics. And it was my opinion that they were gonna attack first. They were going to attack. If we didn't do it, they were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that. And we have Great negotiators, great people, people that do this very successfully and have done it all their lives very successful. And based on the way the negotiation was going, I think they were going to attack first. And I didn't want that to happen. So if anything, I might have forced Israel's hand. But Israel was ready and we were ready and we've we've had a

00:45 a very, very powerful impact. It's almost just childish to see Trump in the White House spent, well, actually I forced Israel to do it. This is when Trump just becomes grating. All those things we thought were charming 10 years ago or endearing or funny, now it's just grating and insufferable. He's obviously full of it, there's nothing true about that at all. This idea that, like you say, that Iran was about to attack us, really? We have two carriers there. We got a dozen warships, 50,000 soldiers, half of our Air Force, and Iran was going to start the war against us. Does that even make any sense? That is completely made up. And then Rubio says Israel launched an attack so we had to because they were gonna attack us. Now Trump goes, no, they were gonna attack us with no information. I mean, I'm sorry, folks. I wanted to support Trump. I support the kill on the carpet. That's why I hate this, cuz he's done a lot of good. We're watching Trump

01:39 Self immolate on live television it is it's a complete unraveling and it's clear what happened there I think look JD Vance and Marco Rubio They want to run for president in 28 so they know that their butt is on the line here if this Iran war doesn't go well There go their presidential ambitions, and so I think that when Rubio comes out and says well Israel made us do it obviously Obviously, this is like a real time narrative construction. So that when in 28 he's questioned about it on the debate stage, if this becomes a debacle, this is hedging, he can say,

02:16 Well, we didn't have any options. We had the choice either we go in with Israel at the beginning or Americans die. Well, I chose to, you know, that's gonna be the argument. That's going to be the campaign speech. That'll be the, you know, screenshot this in a few years. That is what he's gonna say on the debate stage. We had a choice. If we didn't act, then more Americans would have died. And I stood with Trump. We made the bold decision to go in and blah, blah. That is clearly gonna be the answer. And you can tell. We got a whole other hour coming up, but let me just stop you. I said the first to show they're going to use the insurance company shutting down straight over Moose as the claim that we've got to put a beachhead on the Iranian side so they can't close it to secure it for trade. I said, I believe that'll be the excuse for boots on the ground, which they floated in the last few days, which Eric Prince freaked out about rightfully. Ladies and gentlemen, he just put this out, show the timestamp on this guy, scroll down.

CHAPTER 02 / 28 Discussion

Economic Emergency Powers and Unofficial Declarations of War

Donald Trump reportedly signed an executive emergency order to protect shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, which some interpret as an unofficial declaration of war. This move utilizes economic emergency powers to justify a potential military presence on the Iranian side of the strait. Concerns are raised that this "maximum pressure" strategy will inevitably lead to a "boots on the ground" scenario as the U.S. becomes increasingly entangled in the conflict.

donald trump· strait of hormuz· economic emergency powers· boots on the ground· globalists

03:10 Pull it up. I just saw this now. Trump is now saying he signed an executive emergency order basically for war. If anybody tries to close the strait, it's already closed. So this is him using economic emergency powers to have an unofficial declaration of war. Nick, this is horrible. This is really bad. This is boots on the ground. So this is just a few minutes ago. What do you make of this, Nick Vujdas? Well, it's like I said, we're being drawn in here. That is really the operative word. Nobody wants this, it's not in our interest. We are being slowly drawn in. And what that implies is that step by step, we're being dragged further into this. And that's always what happens, it always starts with, we're just putting maximum pressure sanctions. Well, we just killed Qasem Soleimani. Well, we just back to cyber attack. It's always we just did this this one time.

03:59 And all it does is increase our liability. It just increases our stake in this disaster. And so it's very obvious, okay, we go in with the bombs really hard, we destroy the Navy, we destroy the missile launch platforms. Okay, well, then you get this logic like, well, you break it, you bought it. Now Iran inevitably is going to keep throwing missiles at us. We're running out of interceptors. So what do you do now? Iran is going to close the Strait of Hormuz. That's going to shut down 20% of the oil trade. What do you do now? Again, you're being drawn in step by step and our share of this, our stake in this is always increasing until you wake up

04:37 and you find you're in this unthinkable scenario. So that's why I say I don't know that we can rule out boots on the ground in the future. Oh, but that's the plan. People go, oh, the executive order just says they'll protect the ships. Yeah, they're going to do it with troops. I already saw it. I've been explaining this for decades because I've studied history. I've studied sociology, anthropology, archaeology, futurism. predictive programming, what the globalists wanted to build. Couldn't we build alternate plans and dreams? Because humans build what we dream, made in the image of God. And now we see the old globalist order falling apart. We see Trump trying to fill the vacuum with a bunch of American power projection. And whereas I tacitly support the idea of Venezuela cutting off Cuba and Mexico, you see the aftermath. It's still a roll the dice, but I ran.

CHAPTER 03 / 28 Discussion

Greater Israel, Geopolitical Megalomania, and Regional Conflict

Israeli leadership and supporters like Mike Huckabee are accused of pursuing a "Greater Israel" agenda that seeks regional dominance. Reports suggest Israel is bragging about its influence over U.S. policy while targeting other regional powers like Turkey and Saudi Arabia. Senator Marco Rubio's recent statements are viewed as an admission that Israeli actions are driving American military engagement in the Middle East.

israel· benjamin netanyahu· greater israel· turkey· saudi arabia· marco rubio· tucker carlson

05:37 is specifically for the interest of greater Israel with Huckabee now admitting greater Israel. Israel admitting and saying we're a superpower bragging truly the stereotype of Israel wanting global domination and trying to control the US is now a reality. Just as it was nine months ago when they said surgical strike, nuclear program, midnight hammer. And I said then I said this is the prelude of them psychologically giving Trump he thinks a victory to then sell full war even though Chairman Cain of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and others, like Eric Prince that talks to the president and is very smart, said do not do it. The scenarios are too dangerous. And now the Strait of Hormuz is closed. Now the economy's in crisis. Now Iran is firing missiles never before seen that come in and then evade the interceptors. They're not surrendering. They just killed more of the leadership trying to elect a new Soran on the Council of Twelve.

06:41 and you study their power setup, it just gets more psychotic as you go deeper and there are thousands deep. So this does nothing. And then the big bombshell, we'll cover this first with Nick Fuentes for the next hour and 45 minutes. Appreciate him joining us. Marco Rubio to hedge his bets yesterday. We'll play the clip in a moment. Says, oh yeah, I mean, we had to go in because we give the weapons, that's why, to Israel. And so Iran's doctrine is to hit us and all our bases. in any country that has our bases. So we had to preemptively hit them with the missile attacks would be much worse. So that's like I had to attack you before you attack me. And then I said at the start of the show, I said, Trump doesn't want people to know that the tail's wagging the dog. He's gonna get pissed. Sure enough, he said in the press conference with the German

07:33 Chancellor Murs, oh no, Israel didn't do this. Oh, we always attack during the day. No, you don't. That's way more dangerous for so many things. The stealth profile just with the light hitting the wings creates a bigger resonance. Okay, because of ionization happening and other issues. And there's more condensation during the day and it just goes on and on. It's not good to do these attacks. We never do them during the day. That's why I said they're gonna hit Saturday about six o'clock US time, the middle of the night over there. That turned out was the attack plan. Israel attacks first, hits the underground base with the Ayatollah meeting. This was Israel literally dragging us in to the beginning of a third world war. And

08:19 Now, Rubio's like, oh no, Israel didn't drag us in. You can't deny the fact that 200 Israeli aircraft, 30 attacked the command base in Tehran with precision guided AI bombs. And that Israel, we now learn, has hacked into all the cameras and of course released the video of them being blown up in the bunker and brags, oh, we're in all their cameras. It's just unbelievable. So Israel's trying to get us all killed. Netanyahu is trying to get us all killed. Tucker Carlson is totally right that BB's out of control, Israel's out of control. And Nick Fuentes is totally vindicated in his predictions of all of this. Cuz last year, well, during the election two years ago, he said, Trump's gonna go to full war with Iran. And I put pressure, we all did, and hoped that what happened last year nine months ago wouldn't go all the way. But now we're here.

09:24 And you read the Israeli papers and see the lacunics, they don't even think about geopolitics. They don't think about straight or loose clothes and China all angry with habits well cut off. They just literally have all the articles. We run America. We're the superpower. Yeah, we're gonna get Turkey next. I'll play the last Israeli prime minister bragging. We may have to hit Saudi Arabia. So we got megalomania going on right now. And we have little time to turn this back. So let's go to clip 16. This is Marco Rubio. Yesterday, like, hey, it's no big deal. Israel struck. We had to. So literally saying Israel drives our policy. This is an admission. Now they're trying to put that back in the bottle. I don't care what Rubio said. I said that Saturday. We already know this. So now he gaslights us and says, oh, no, they didn't. Oh, no, they did. Here's the clip.

CHAPTER 04 / 28 Discussion

Marco Rubio Explains U.S. Military Objectives in Iran

Senator Marco Rubio outlines the U.S. military's focus on eliminating Iran's short-range ballistic missiles and naval threats. He justifies the timing of the operation by claiming Iran had already delegated launch orders to field commanders following an initial strike on a leadership compound. Critics argue these actions bypass congressional authorization and represent an unconstitutional shift toward forced regime change.

marco rubio· pentagon· department of war· ballistic missiles· iranian navy· regime change

10:31 The United States conducted this operation with a fair goal in mind. I haven't got a chance to see a lot of reporting. I don't understand what the confusion is. Let me explain it to you and I'll do it once again as clearly as possible. Perhaps you'll report it that way. The United States is conducting an operation to eliminate the threat of Iran's short-range ballistic missiles and the threat posed by their navy, particularly to naval assets. That is what it is focused on doing right now and it's doing quite successfully. I'll leave it to the Pentagon and the Department of War to discuss the tactics behind that and the progress that's being made. That is the clear objective of this mission. The second question that's been asked is, why now? Well, there's two reasons why now.

11:10 The first is it was abundantly clear that if Iran came under attack by anyone, the United States or Israel or anyone, they were going to respond and respond against the United States. The orders had been delegated down to the field commanders. It was automatic and in fact it bared to be true because in fact within an hour of the initial attack on the leadership compound, The missile forces in the south and in the north for that matter had already been activated to launch in fact that those are even pre-positioned The third is the assessment that was made that if we stood and waited for that attack to come first before we hit them

11:46 So Israel hits him So we have to go to full war now. And they try to claim, oh, we're just trying to get their missiles now. No, Trump says, oh, we killed 40 something. Now we're going to kill the rest. It's about regime change. So these are clear promises broken. This is clearly unconstitutional. Did you congressional authorization? This is full war. It's out of control. I appreciate Nick holding while the 10 minute intro, Nick.

CHAPTER 05 / 28 Discussion

Nick Fuentes on Trump as the Iran War Candidate

Guest Nick Fuentes argues that Donald Trump was always destined to be the "Iran war candidate," suggesting his 2024 victory was permitted by establishment forces who knew he would engage Iran more aggressively than Democrats. Fuentes claims Benjamin Netanyahu has successfully orchestrated confrontations to force the U.S. into a conflict. He posits that the "Midnight Hammer" strike was intended to be a limited engagement that has now escalated beyond control.

nick fuentes· donald trump· joe biden· benjamin netanyahu· 2024 election· midnight hammer

12:37 Pointes is our guest and again people say this guy's pro-white, this guy's whatever. We have major universities saying no whites allowed. We have whites of the devil must be exterminated in New York Times. This is the natural response to that. So I don't want to hear a bunch of stuff. I always want to say that as a premise right up front. So Nick, You told us what was coming two years ago, you've been proven right. You're like the new Alex Jones being right on things. So I want you to give your take on what's currently happening and then what you predict is gonna come next. And is there any way to get Trump to extricate himself from this bear trap? Well, I'll take the last question first. I think the answer is no.

13:18 And I was very pessimistic about the prospect of that going into this administration. As you know, in 2024, I said that Trump is the Iran war candidate. It was inevitable that Trump would take us to war. And as a matter of fact, I think that's a large reason. why he got elected in the first place. I think that if you look at the election in 2020, it was obviously stolen and rigged. And so you say, well, how did he then come back and win in 2024? Well, clearly the riggers had to stand down and let him take office. And whether that's a combination of the media, social media, electioneering, whatever you wanna say, they let him win. And I think they let him win because they knew

13:56 that unlike Joe Biden and unlike the Democrats, he was going to have no hesitation, no reluctance whatsoever to engage Iran and its proxies, which of course he then did throughout 2025 and 26. So as to whether he can extricate himself from the situation, I don't think so. I think that over and over we see the same pattern where whether it's a Democrat or a Republican, Israel triggers a confrontation with Iran. And the United States does its best, I think, in both cases, in a Democrat or Republican administration, to mitigate the severity of the confrontation. So Joe Biden used deterrence. I believe that Donald Trump last year wanted that midnight hammer strike to be the end of the nuclear program and one tap and the war.

14:42 But of course, Israel has orchestrated all of these different confrontations. They're deliberately provoking and triggering them. And I think that was the same story here. What has happened, as you said, as Marco Rubio said yesterday, is that Israel came to the United States, Netanyahu came to the White House for, I believe, the sixth time since Trump took office for the second time. And he told Trump, we're going in, and you can join us or you cannot join us, but we're going to attack and your soldiers are gonna be collateral damage. And so they forced our hand. And what is happening now, once again, is actually very much more of the same, which is that in the same way that in previous years,

CHAPTER 06 / 28 Discussion

Divergent U.S. and Israeli Strategies for Iranian Regime Change

The U.S. and Israel maintain different long-term goals for Iran, with Washington focusing on denuclearization while Israel seeks total regime change. The "Venezuela model" of limited bombing and internal negotiation is contrasted with the Israeli desire to install a liberal democratic government led by figures like the Shah. Skepticism remains regarding whether killing the Ayatollah would lead to a more compliant Iranian government or simply empower more radical hardliners.

iran· israel· irgc· ayatollah· wmd· non-proliferation· venezuela model

15:21 Washington and Tel Aviv actually diverge on their Iran policy. For example, Washington seeks denuclearization. Our doctrine is non-proliferation of WMDs. Our imperative is we don't want Iran to have the bomb. Israel, on the other hand, has always wanted regime change. And these are two completely different things. Israel seeks the termination not just of the Ayatollah, but of the entire Islamic Revolutionary Government. And so That tension has characterized the three-way diplomacy between the US, Israel, and Iran. This war is more of the same. I believe that Trump went in knowing that Israel was going in. And I believe the play, to the extent that there is any kind of a plan, is Trump wants the Venezuela model. I'm sure that he, and I think Vance and the others as well,

16:10 They thought they would go in hard and quickly against Iran, destroy the Navy, destroy the missile production, destroy the missile launch platforms, kill some of the top brass. And the expectation is that somebody from within the Iranian Revolutionary Guard would rise up as a pragmatist and negotiate with the United States for peace. And they would maintain Iran's government structure and security architecture while being pliant or compliant with the United States. And by the way, you're not just speculating, they admit this insane gamble, just a crazy shot in the dark gamble.

16:46 Yes, and that is the correct word. It's a gamble. That is totally a roll of the dice whether that will happen. We just don't know that. We don't know who that might be, if that will happen. Now further, this is why this is the ongoing divergence in Washington-Tel Aviv policy. That's not going to be enough for Israel, even if that was possible. Let's say in your revolutionary, zealot, Shiite, theocratic government, you get a faction from the IRGC that wants to negotiate with Washington after they killed the Ayatollah and half the leadership and blew up the country. Even if that happens, will this satisfy Israel? The answer is no.

17:25 Because what Israel is seeking is a total regime change. They want to install a liberal democratic government, maybe led by the Shah or at least a transition led by the Shah. And why? So that they can manipulate the future state of Iran as they did in Syria, as they did in Iraq, as they did in these other countries. And that was my point from Saturday on is you can look at this one dimensionally, yeah, movements are bad. the British, the US and Israel always put worse people in. Hezbollah, Al Qaeda in charge of Syria. The idea that, oh, the West is this fairy godmother creating My Little Pony Heavens is bullshit. Well, that's totally true. And not only that, but

CHAPTER 07 / 28 Discussion

Israeli Grand Strategy and the Fragmentation of the Middle East

Analyst Nick Fuentes discusses the "Israeli grand strategy" of breaking up neighboring countries into smaller, manageable territories, citing Iraq and Syria as previous examples. There is ongoing discussion about using Kurdish forces as a ground element to facilitate the breakup of Iran. This multi-domain operation is viewed as a way to ensure no single regional power can challenge Israeli interests.

syria· iraq· kurds· hezbollah· al-qaeda· grand strategy· balkanization

16:46 Yes, and that is the correct word. It's a gamble. That is totally a roll of the dice whether that will happen. We just don't know that. We don't know who that might be, if that will happen. Now further, this is why this is the ongoing divergence in Washington-Tel Aviv policy. That's not going to be enough for Israel, even if that was possible. Let's say in your revolutionary, zealot, Shiite, theocratic government, you get a faction from the IRGC that wants to negotiate with Washington after they killed the Ayatollah and half the leadership and blew up the country. Even if that happens, will this satisfy Israel? The answer is no.

17:25 Because what Israel is seeking is a total regime change. They want to install a liberal democratic government, maybe led by the Shah or at least a transition led by the Shah. And why? So that they can manipulate the future state of Iran as they did in Syria, as they did in Iraq, as they did in these other countries. And that was my point from Saturday on is you can look at this one dimensionally, yeah, movements are bad. the British, the US and Israel always put worse people in. Hezbollah, Al Qaeda in charge of Syria. The idea that, oh, the West is this fairy godmother creating My Little Pony Heavens is bullshit. Well, that's totally true. And not only that, but

18:07 I think it's likely at this point that a hardliner regime takes power because who's gonna be left after these people watch their leaders get killed and their colleagues and their own countrymen get killed. I don't think they become more compliant and it's a country of 90 million people. They have a million soldiers between all the security services. I don't know that they're just gonna lay down and beg for mercy at this point. Why would they? Americans, even a pussified Americans wouldn't do that. The Vietnamese, no, they're not gonna lay down, they're gonna get more aggressive. They will and that plays into Israel's hands. Because then what this does is it basically reignites the pretext for war. So the language in the Trump admin is escalation. We're gonna bomb them even harder. We're not ruling out boots on the ground. It can always get worse.

18:53 And so maybe you get a ceasefire, a new regime comes to power, they don't surrender. And then we have to come up with a more permanent solution. And this is where now the US is talking to the Kurds and talking about the Kurds maybe potentially being a ground force. Now they're talking about breaking Iran up, which is the Israeli plan to break up every country there. Right, as they did in Iraq, as they did in Syria. That's the textbook Israeli grand strategy. So yes, and that's the thing. You never see the end of the Iran war. It's always this is just the latest climax. This is just the latest ceiling of hostilities between the US, Iran and Israel, which have been ongoing for decades. And I don't think this is the end of it.

CHAPTER 08 / 28 Discussion

Psychological Manipulation of Trump and the Failure of America First

Critics suggest that Donald Trump is being psychologically manipulated by advisors who saturate his information diet to favor military escalation. Despite the presence of "America First" figures like Tulsi Gabbard and JD Vance in the orbit of the administration, none reportedly advised against the current strikes. The prediction is made that a full-scale regime change involving ground forces is inevitable before the end of the current presidential term.

donald trump· tulsi gabbard· jd vance· marco rubio· eric prince· psychological operations

19:34 I don't know that I'd be surprised. I totally agree. Do you think Trump even, I'm not trying to give him a get out of jail free card, but I actually know what your answer is. I know you're smart. Do you think Trump even understands this? An amateur is, no. No, I don't think so. And I think he just overestimates his abilities. I'm sure that in part maybe they did Venezuela to build up his confidence because Venezuela is a totally different story. 28 million people. The regime's not loyal. They did the limited bombing thing and let him negotiate and have Israel stand down. They did that thing last year, I said, to get his confidence up with Iran. You did say that. I remember I was down there and you said exactly that. And I think that is quite literally the play, which is you get that momentum, you get that inertia. And I'm sure they told him that this would create a deterrent effect. You do it to Venezuela, you can bring the force to Iran and say, hey, look, look what we did to this guy. Remember, they got top psychologists, the really good ones, are studying Trump. And they're pitching him bullshit, seeing what works, going back. I mean, it's disgusting.

20:36 It is and they manipulate him. People say it's blackmail, people say that they got a tape of him. I don't think it's that complicated. I think that they surround him, they saturate his information diet and they form his opinions, they create the options. And the question is, where's the personnel? Where's Tulsi Gabbard? Isn't she the DNI? Where is she? Where's Vance? Where's Rubio? These are all supposed to be America first people that we were supposed to be excited about in the cabinet. And what we find from the times is that not even a single one of them told Trump not to do it. And these were all ostensibly supposed to be against the endless wars, the Middle Eastern conflicts. I didn't think you were wrong two years ago when you predicted this or last year when you said it. I hoped we could avert this. But clearly now

21:22 If you follow Trump's psychology, I think he just doubles down. So where does that go? So I think that it will end in regime change one way or another. What happens imminently is sort of unpredictable. It's hard to imagine how exactly the Iranians respond and what the Trump administration has up its sleeves in terms of escalation. But I think that Israel, clearly they're driving the policy. They've orchestrated all of these events. They're not letting go until there's a regime change. And what Israel wants, they get. So I think that before the four years are up, you're gonna see a full scale regime change. And for that to happen, there's gonna need to be a ground presence. Maybe that's partial US, partially it's militia or it's Kurds. I believe that is what was driving the protests even a month ago. It was all in the Western half of the country in the Kurdish part. And they said that these were people clad in black and they had automatic weapons and they appear to be trained. So I imagine it's gonna be some kind of smart power, multi-domain operation

22:22 with the militias armed, maybe from Iraqi Kurdistan, which shares the border, and maybe from Turkey. And I think there's gonna be some kind of force that comes in and forces a transition. I think that's, when you work out the math on that, I think that's all but inevitable. And it seems unlikely now, but It seemed unlikely that we'd be here. It seemed unlikely we'd be bombing Iran into submission or that we'd bomb their nuclear program a year ago. It just keeps escalating in that direction. But you predicted it because I watch your show, I watch clips almost every day, but whenever I can, I watch, I'm gonna work out hours of it every few days. You literally, it was uncanny, I remember laid all this out two years ago. How'd you know that? You just knew their policy? They said it.

CHAPTER 09 / 28 Discussion

Provocation Tactics and the Al-Aqsa Flood Context

The October 7 attacks are framed as the result of deliberate provocations at the Al-Aqsa mosque and the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. These actions, including religious rites and the symbolic search for a "red heifer," are described as tactics to elicit a Muslim response that justifies U.S. military intervention. The goal is to reset international relations in the region by eliminating the "Islamic crescent" led by Iran.

october 7· al-aqsa mosque· jerusalem· hamas· red heifer· temple mount

23:05 They said it openly, I appreciate you saying that. And it is true, I did predict it almost to the letter, but they were basically saying this in October 2023. Right after the October 7th attacks, the Israelis all came out and they said, this is going to be a regional war. We're gonna destroy all the proxies, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis, and then we're gonna cut the head off the snake. They said, we're gonna reset the international relations in the region that has prevailed for 50 years. And I think what they meant by that is this Islamic crescent headed by Iran, which was only the latest one after the Ba'athists, after the Arab coalition between Syria and Egypt. So I think that if you're really paying attention, even to the rhetoric from Trump, everybody forgets that the Israelis were whispering in Trump's ear that Iran was trying to assassinate him. Why do you think they did that?

23:58 It's because they were already laying the groundwork. That was their pre-programming to sabotage that relationship so that they could tell him when he becomes president, hey, remember, they did try to kill you. And that was always meant to spoil diplomacy between the two countries. Let me ask you this question then. Why do the Israelis for five years wear on their, a lot of their uniforms, the greater Israel map Why do they admit it in their newspapers, then attack us and censor us when we say it, and then have dozens of articles a day, I can't even keep track of them, saying, we run America, we're the new superpower, we're gonna take out Turkey, we're gonna take out our allies through Obama, you know, they took out, and put the Muslim Brotherhood in, you know, they created Hamas. I mean, we're sitting here watching, and it's not just Netanyahu, it's the other main party and their last Prime Minister, saying we're gonna get Turkey and others next. I mean,

24:52 And then they think we're gonna go to war now with Turkey, the biggest conventional military in Europe. I mean, it's like there's this giant buffet and Israel's like a thousand pound fat person that wants us to sit there and hand feed all this at our expense. I mean, this is just megalomania. So I know Israel's smart in an evil way, but why do they brag? I guess to enrage everybody else that's awake? Because that just adds to the furor? What's going on here? I think that that is a deliberate provocation. I think that part of their entire MO

25:29 is they actually need the conflict, they feed on the conflict. All of this was the result from October 7th. And after all, what was October 7th? Well, they called it the Al-Aqsa flood operation. What is Al-Aqsa? That is the mosque, that's the Temple Mount, that's the Dome on the Rock, which is in Jerusalem, which is the center really of the occupied territory dispute that the Palestinians claim East Jerusalem as the capital and they claim that's their third holiest mosque in Islam. And what the Jews did in Israel that precipitated the October 7th attack is they had all of these Jews go to the Dome on the Rock, go to the mosque in Jerusalem, to the Al-Aqsa compound, and they started doing their religious rites in a very provocative way. And actually, that was the precipitating cause. And killing the Red Heifer.

26:19 Yes, yes, finding the red heifer, the unblemished heifer and everything. And it was deliberately intended to provoke the Muslims into a response. And I think that the stuff about greater Israel, the goal is the same. It is to provoke these countries into conflict. Because ultimately that is the way they're going to achieve their goals, is to elicit hostility. And then that's the pretext to bring in the United States to fight their wars for them. And I think that's the playbook from day one. So that is all part of it. Telegraphing that, signaling that, that's all part of the sick agenda, sadly. No, I agree. So let's unpack this and how do we stop it? How do we stop it? We'll be right back with Nick Fuentes, stay with us, share the live feeds now. We're engaged in world changing information here.

27:00 And now our credibility is higher than ever, but it takes funds to operate. So it's a win-win. I sell you supplements, super nutrient compounds that are the certified best, strongest, highest rated, most loved, totally tested products at theologyshowstore.com. And we have a massive sale. Alert, alert, alert. I'm saying this live on air Thursday, February 26th. And that means you have until midnight Monday, March 2nd to get our incredible highest quality concentrated creatine, private label, the top brand in the country. So good for your whole body. So good for your brain, good for everything. And you get a free bottle of Irish Sea Moss gummies and our high quality shillas. You get either or. You choose absolutely free with

CHAPTER 10 / 28 Discussion

Public Disapproval and Trump's Gamble on Military Victory

Despite polls from the Washington Post and Reuters showing only 30% approval for the Iran conflict, Donald Trump is reportedly gambling on a quick military victory to boost his popularity. Trump has publicly stated he does not care about approval ratings or the potential for "boots on the ground." Critics warn that an invasion to secure the Strait of Hormuz could result in casualty numbers exceeding those of the Vietnam War.

donald trump· washington post· reuters· approval ratings· vietnam· public opinion

29:42 Because they're tuned in here. They probably were smart for they tuned in. That's why they look for something else smart. Bird of a feather fly together, flock together. But it's not about tuning our horns. It's about saying we need to save civilization and humanity. Nick Fointe's, you can disagree with his conclusions or what he thinks should be done sometimes, but you can't disagree with his analysis. And the fact that he goes up against top geopolitical White House advisors with five degrees and kicks their ass. So, respect needs to be due. But also, it's not just the globals we're fighting, it's the low IQ people that we've woken up who are more like in high school and they want to, in a hierarchy, say, you know, everybody's a globalist but them. It's something that the Israelis and the other lobbies feed with bots to make us fight with each other so we don't recognize the organic leaders that God has given us.

30:38 to lead us out of this. I want to just say that right up front that I respect Nick Fuentes because he knows what he's talking about. I can disagree on the final product of thousands of points that go together or say maybe this is better and sometimes he's right more than I am. The difference is he knows what he's talking about and I am sick and tired of having debate low-grade morons that don't even know how to find their ass with both hands. So, Nick, let me throw this out at you because we got a lot of time here and I appreciate it. But I want you to quantify before we go to these clips and unpack this, then what you think is coming next, what you predict next, how we can stop this. We've already said we can't, but we still gotta try. I think you're right. I'm about to evacuate to South America or something, that's where all the globalists are going. Here's my question. Looking at all of this, is there

31:38 I want you to think about this. I know you already said no. What could we do? A peaceful demonstration, I don't know, hang something on our doorway or liberals will say mass strike. I don't wanna join them in that, because then you're outlawed with Islam. Is there any way to get Trump off this destructive course we're on? And then maybe describe to people, because you predicted the future, where this course takes us. Nick Fuentes. Well, as I said, I'm very pessimistic about that. And the reason being is because when you look at the numbers, it's not popular. They did all the polls this weekend. You got Washington Post, Reuters, I think there's a few others. And the approval rating for the conflict is sitting at about 30%, right around 30%, maybe just under that. And Trump has to know this is a utter betrayal of his campaign promise of no new wars, and he's the peace president and so on.

32:30 So as far as a massive demonstration, what is that supposed to demonstrate? That the war is unpopular? They know the war is unpopular. Is that supposed to demonstrate that we're dissatisfied? They know we're dissatisfied. And I think that that gets back to the nature of it, which is that it is a gamble. And I think that Trump is counting on the fact, well, let's actually be honest for a moment here about it. Trump is counting on the fact or the possibility that this works, that this little gambit pays off. And we bomb Iran a lot for a week. It's quick and it's hard and then we leave and we get what we want and there's minimal loss of life. If it is successful, I think people on our side may even be underestimating the appetite for something like that among the general public. If it's a big victory or if they're able to plausibly claim victory, it may even be popular. And so I think Trump is actually okay with this. I think that Trump

33:22 The way he sees it, because he said this the other day, he said, I don't care about approval ratings. He said, and I'll put boots on the ground, I don't care. Now, obviously he cares on some level. But I think in his mind, this is all- Yeah, he better care about a bunch of dead tribs. I mean, you talk about, we're talking, oh, it'll make Vietnam numbers look tame. Well, it depends on what they do. If it's a full scale invasion, you're absolutely right because they will try to inflict maximum casualties and it will get ugly. It will be like Iraq. Yeah, there's obviously already special forces there before this happened. I'm talking about a real invasion to quote, secure the Strait of Hormuz or whatever, that's how they'll start it. It's just, it's a disaster.

CHAPTER 11 / 28 Discussion

Iranian Internal Power Dynamics and Israeli Deterrence

The U.S. administration is reportedly hoping that military pressure will cause a pragmatic faction within the Iranian government to seize power. However, recent leadership changes in Iran suggest a shift toward more radical elements following the deaths of previous officials. Nick Fuentes argues that Israel actively sabotages diplomacy because a stable deal would prevent the total toppling of the Iranian regime.

iran· mullah· irgc· israel· hamas· deterrence· diplomacy

34:01 Right, yeah, and I agree. And I think that on some level he obviously cares about these things, but this is part of the bluff. This is part of the gambit, which is partially I think some of the things he's saying is meant to signal to the Iranians that things could get worse. If the goal, if the outcome that you desire is for a pragmatic faction to take power and negotiate with the United States, well, to persuade them that that is the logical course, you would actually need to convince them that things could get worse. And that's why they just had the council meeting to elect a new Mullah who didn't want peace right now. They just killed them today. So he's hoping like maybe the next group's less radical. But as you said on your show a few days ago, it's true. As you go down the chain, they get more radical and stupider.

34:46 Yes, and that is why he's trying to persuade them that it could always get worse. I'm sure in their mind, in Trump's mind, he's thinking that these Iranians expect that maybe they could ride out the storm if they could survive. If they could hide out in shelters, then maybe there's gonna be some continuity of government. And Trump is trying to persuade them that if they don't capitulate, it could get worse. The bottom could continue to fall out from under them. And what they really don't want- Influence farmers will say you just endorsed Trump. No, when you war game what he's thinking, you're not endorsing that. Right? No, we're purely speculating about his state of mind and what his approach is. And so I think that you see the clips of you where they take you war gaming and say that's your same thing to me. That's what they do. I just want to get that out there always.

35:34 Yeah, well and I consider those people to be third worldists because they are really arguing for Iran in and of itself or Venezuela in and of itself or China. And me, I look at Iran not as a great country, I mean they're a Muslim theocracy, but I look at them as a country that one, they're a sovereign state so I don't think we have business going in and killing New York. And they have the potential to destroy us and bring down the economy. Right, and I would go further than that. They balance Israel. There's a balance between Iran and Israel. I don't know that that's the worst thing in the world because if you have two very powerful states- No, I agree. Israel needs to be contained. Why are they now publicly admitting everywhere? I'm sure you've seen it, that yeah, we're taking everything, including their allies. It'd be like if my neighbor said, yeah, I just went over and screwed my neighbor's wife and your wife's next.

36:28 Yeah, like I said, I think it's a provocation. It's intended to be provocative. They actually do not want peace in the region. And all of this is based on fueling this ongoing conflict. They don't want it. Same reason they stood down on October 7th. Same reason they founded Hamas. Yes, and Americans are under the impression that we're desperate to make a deal and there's this peace that is just always elusive, always out of reach. If only the Muslims would just relax. But it takes two to tango here. The Israelis, they are the ones that actually want the conflict. They didn't want to deal with Iran. If they get a deal with Iran, that they don't get to topple the Iranian regime. If Iran gets a deal with the United States, maybe they give up their nukes on some timeline, but they also get to normalize their trade relations and diplomatic relations with all the countries in the region. Exactly. Israel wants to keep it a no man's land and keep them in the timeout box.

CHAPTER 12 / 28 Discussion

Political Betrayal and the Case for Voting Democrat in 2026

Nick Fuentes proposes a "corrective" strategy of voting for Democrats in the 2026 midterms to punish the Republican Party for broken promises regarding the Epstein files, border wall construction, and the war in Iran. He argues that the GOP establishment only understands the language of losing power. This strategy is intended to force a rebirth of the "America First" movement in time for the 2028 presidential election.

gop· epstein files· marjorie taylor greene· deportations· 2026 midterms· 2028 election

37:21 Yes, they want to maintain that kind of operational control like they had in Syria where they can control the airspace and they can just drop bombs and then they could ultimately control the outcome in that country and make it significantly weaker. So that's the sick logic of Israel's grand strategy. We have a full sales job now by Netanyahu, Trump, and now Vance. We have the clips that it may last a little while, a long time, it may last forever. We're being sold on a forever war right now. And so here's my problem. I don't want the Democrats open to the border. I like Trump killing the carbon tax. I like to know tax on tips. There's all this good stuff, but rapidly, I can ignore some stuff and hold my nose with Trump, but quickly, I mean, by the hour, I morally cannot be part of this. You're already there saying vote Democrat. I get you're saying that as a carrot and stick, but I mean, what the hell's going on here?

38:16 I think you have to. I think you have to vote Democrat in 26, and I'll tell you why. I mean, we're being told always that the Republicans are the lesser of two evils, that they're gonna be marginally better than the Democrats. Look at all of the broken promises. Epstein files, that's huge. It's huge. And let's be honest, they tried to cover it up. It's not like they fumbled that. It's not like they made a mistake. They engaged in an active cover up and they failed only because of a revolt within their own party. And now Marjorie Greene is an outcast. She was like the MAGA congresswoman. She was like the one in Congress who came after Trump won the election. She's an outcast because she led the coup to get the Epstein files released. That's a big one. Then you got the deportations.

39:03 They haven't started on the border wall. And even though they secured the border, look, they secured the border in 2020. What good did that do when Joe Biden came into power? Nothing, because then he just overturned all the executive orders and they came pouring in. That's why you need the wall. They haven't started it. 230,000 deportations, it isn't happening. And now we're in a regime change war with Iran. And you know, you've been around, I've been around not as long as you, but for some time. Regime change in Iran is like synonymous with the neocons ultimate master plan. That is like the number one thing on Israel's wish list. It was the whole mentally strategy and the rebuilding America's defenses PNAC plan 2020, 2000 was this.

39:46 Yes, and even further than that, going back to clean break in 96, this has always been the plan. And for a time we thought that was unthinkable. We thought that Trump winning made that impossible. So for Trump to be the one to take us there and sell it and push it and trigger it and now we're in a regime change war with Iran, it's almost unbelievable to even say that. thousands of American Israeli airstrikes destroying Iran's military. Here's how I feel about it. If you will tolerate that, you will tolerate anything. At what point do you say no? What point do you say there's no excuses? People say, well, if there's boots on the ground, boots on the ground. Dude, they're dropping bombs everywhere, and it's in Iran. So for me, I said that's the last straw.

40:31 I'm out and you know me, I'm the furthest thing from a Democrat. I'm far right, I'm not left wing or even liberal. I don't consider myself even a center liberal or a right liberal. Let's talk about that Democrats get in, isn't that accelerationist? No, I think that, I don't know that I would characterize it as accelerationist. I would characterize it as corrective. And it's sending a message to the GOP before the big one, which is 28. Yeah, you're saying the only leverage we've got is the wake up call. Right, and 28, we gotta win that one. I really believe a Republican's gotta win, but we need it to be the right Republican. And I don't know that there's any other language they will understand other than to show them we're not showing up in 26. And what's more, I also think that Vance and Rubio are to blame in this as well. If they couldn't stop a war in Iran when they're in power now, how

CHAPTER 13 / 28 Discussion

Senate Leadership and the Expansion of War Powers

Senate Leader John Thune asserts that the President has the necessary authority to conduct operations in Iran without new congressional authorization, despite controversies surrounding the War Powers Act. JD Vance adds that the objective is a long-term commitment from Iran to abandon nuclear weapons, moving beyond the mere destruction of enrichment facilities like Fordow.

john thune· war powers act· national security· nuclear weapons· fordow· natanz

41:26 How are they going to make the decision when they become the president? But Vance was an open thing. He's come out now and said we may be there in a long war. So Vance is definitely getting in line with that. In fact, speaking of the devil, let's go to those clips first. Here's Thune, the leader of the Senate, saying Trump doesn't need a war powers. He has authorization, which no, he doesn't. This is pure war, folks. This is not blow up their weapons. This is regime change. And then Vance saying the same thing and then saying basically this could be a forever war. And then I want to go through these other clips, but here it is. I think the president has the authority that he needs to conduct

42:19 the activities, the operations that are currently underway there. And as you know, there's a lot of controversy around, questions around the War Powers Act, but I think the president is acting in the best interest of the nation and our national security interests by ensuring that he's protecting Americans and American bases and installations in that region, as well as those of our allies. Margarita yesterday Israel launched the attack they were gonna attack us we had to attack them because they would attack us and we attacked them soon Just said we attacked them. So they're gonna attack us. So now we have to authorize the war So we attack somebody so the president of a war powers act because he has a power to attack somebody I mean, this is insane continue

43:08 The United States has a lot of optionality here. And, you know, we could go for a little bit longer, we could go for a lot longer, but I think the president just wants to make it clear to the Iranians and to the world that he is not going to rest until he accomplishes that all-important objective of ensuring that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon. Not just for the next few years, not just because we obliterated Fordow or some other enrichment facility, but because the Iranians themselves commit long-term to not building a nuclear weapon. So we've gone from, oh, we successfully destroyed their nuclear stuff, which I said was BS, to now total war. Nick Fuentes. Yeah, they said last year that the program was completely obliterated. And you know, we've almost even talked past the point, it's sort of interesting, last year the pretext for bombing Iran

CHAPTER 14 / 28 Discussion

Shift from Denuclearization to Regime Change Policy

The justification for military action against Iran has shifted from preventing a nuclear bomb to achieving total regime change. Critics point out that while preemptive strikes for regime change are illegal under international law, many Democrats like Chuck Schumer and John Fetterman are quietly supporting the administration's moves. This shift mirrors the lead-up to the Iraq War, using multiple shifting pretexts to build a case for conflict.

iran· donald trump· chuck schumer· john fetterman· impeachment· regime change

43:55 in the first place was that they were racing towards a nuclear bomb. When Israel hit Iran on June 13, 25, they said, well, Iran was going to strike us and they were racing towards a device. That's why we had to preempt that by striking them. And then of course, the US intervened to finish the job at Fordo and Natanz, which only we could do with the bunker busters from the B-2 bombers. Well, then In January, when these protests started in Iran, all of a sudden that shifted and Trump came out and said, well, we were going to attack Iran. But we couldn't topple the regime in one blow. And you say, well, wait a second. I thought Israel and the United States attacked Iran last year because they were on their way to a nuke. But then we took care of it and we blew up their program. Now they're saying, well, we couldn't bomb Iran at our discretion in January because it wasn't going to topple the regime. And you say, topple the regime? I thought it was about the nuclear program. And like you say, now we're in it. Now we're in a full-fledged regime change war. And you wonder,

44:57 Who made this decision exactly? Who voted for this? Why is this happening? Arguably, it is within, I think, America's interest to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. And if they're about to imminently acquire them, a case could be made. I don't know that I would make it, but in a theoretical, a case could be made that the United States might preempt that by intervening in Iran. The point is they've abandoned that cover story and Trump says, oh, we killed 47, now we'll kill the rest. It's all about regime change now, which under the law is illegal to preemptively attack somebody saying I want regime change. So Trump's being set up here with major impeachment charges.

45:36 Well, and they're throwing everything out there. It's the dead protesters. It's the nuclear program. It's the missiles. It's just like Iraq. It's exactly like Iraq. They're building a nuke, but also they did the anthrax plot. Also 9-11. They just throw everything out there in the hopes that enough people are gonna buy it. And like you said, there's nothing legal about this. What is the authorization for the use of force against Iran? Did Congress declare war? At what point was this decision made and exactly by whom? So I don't know that this is impeachable because ironically, the Democrats supported too. Chuck Schumer came out of the closed door hearing with Marco Rubio at the State of the Union or the afternoon of and said, well, this is very serious and Trump's just gonna have to make his case.

46:20 There's a lot of Democrats that support this, guys like John Fetterman among others. They're stepping back and did not take any problems if it goes sideways, but they're behind it. 100%, 100%, I think so. And I don't think they would move against him for that. So- Here's Trump saying, that

47:00 Trump forces real sand to strike first during the middle of the day against our doctrine. And then why do you think Rubio came out yesterday and said Israel forced their hand? What is the impetus behind that was here it is. I might have forced their hand. You see, we were having negotiations with these lunatics. And it was my opinion that they were going to attack first. They were going to attack if we didn't do it. They were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that. And we have great negotiators, great people, people that do this very successfully and have done it all their lives very successful. And based on the way the negotiation was going, I think they were going to attack first. And I didn't want that to happen. So if anything, I might have forced Israel's hand.

CHAPTER 15 / 28 Discussion

Trump Claims Credit for Forcing Israeli Military Action

Donald Trump asserts in a press conference that he "forced Israel's hand" to strike Iran first during negotiations with "lunatics." This contradicts earlier claims by Marco Rubio that the U.S. was forced to act because of Israeli initiatives. Meanwhile, reports emerge of a new executive order regarding the Strait of Hormuz, which is viewed by some as a precursor to deploying ground troops.

donald trump· israel· iran· marco rubio· eric prince· strait of hormuz

46:20 There's a lot of Democrats that support this, guys like John Fetterman among others. They're stepping back and did not take any problems if it goes sideways, but they're behind it. 100%, 100%, I think so. And I don't think they would move against him for that. So- Here's Trump saying, that

47:00 Trump forces real sand to strike first during the middle of the day against our doctrine. And then why do you think Rubio came out yesterday and said Israel forced their hand? What is the impetus behind that was here it is. I might have forced their hand. You see, we were having negotiations with these lunatics. And it was my opinion that they were going to attack first. They were going to attack if we didn't do it. They were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that. And we have great negotiators, great people, people that do this very successfully and have done it all their lives very successful. And based on the way the negotiation was going, I think they were going to attack first. And I didn't want that to happen. So if anything, I might have forced Israel's hand.

47:54 But Israel was ready and we were ready and we've had a very, very powerful impact. Well, since the 80s, Iran has not launched an attack first. Every attack has been a response, a retaliatory attack. I mean, that is literally pulled out of Trump's butt, Nick. It is, and that's exactly what happened last year too. Israel came in and Trump said, we knew they were doing it. They told us and the whole negotiations were a ruse. It's almost just childish to see Trump in the White House spit, well, actually I forced Israel to do it. This is when Trump just becomes grating. All those things we thought were charming 10 years ago or endearing or funny, now it's just grating and insufferable. He's obviously full of it. There's nothing true about that at all. This idea that, like you say, that Iran was about to attack us, really?

48:44 We have two carriers there. We got a dozen warships, 50,000 soldiers, half of our Air Force, and Iran was going to start the war against us. Does that even make any sense? That is completely made up. And then Rubio says Israel launched an attack so we had to because they were gonna attack us. Now Trump goes, no, they were gonna attack us with no information. I mean, I'm sorry, folks. I wanted to support Trump. I support the killing the carpet. That's why I hate this cuz he's done a lot of good. We're watching Trump Self immolate on live television it is it's a complete unraveling and it's clear what happened there I think look JD Vance and Marco Rubio They want to run for president in 28 so they know that their butt is on the line here if this Iran war doesn't go well There go their presidential ambitions, and so I think that when Rubio comes out and says well Israel made us do it I'm

49:38 Obviously, this is like a real time narrative construction. So that when in 28 he's questioned about it on the debate stage, if this becomes a debacle, this is hedging, he can say, Well, we didn't have any options. We had the choice. Either we go in with Israel at the beginning or Americans die. Well, I chose to, that's gonna be the argument. That's going to be the campaign speech. That'll be the, screenshot this. In a few years, that is what he's gonna say on the debate stage. We had a choice. If we didn't act, then more Americans would have died. And I stood with Trump. We made the bold decision to go in and blah, blah.

50:15 clearly going to be the answer. You're on a roll. You're on a roll. We got a whole other hour coming up, but let me just stop you. I said this first, the show, they're going to use the insurance company shutting down the trade or a Moose as the claim that we've got to put a beachhead on the Iranian side so they can't close it to secure it for trade. I said, I believe that'll be the excuse for boots on the ground, which they floated in the last few days, which Eric Prince freaked out about rightfully. Ladies and gentlemen, he just put this out, show the timestamp on this guy, scroll down. Pull it up. I just saw this now. Trump is now saying he signed an executive emergency order basically for war. If anybody tries to close the strait, it's already closed. So this is him using economic emergency powers to have an unofficial declaration of war. Nick, this is horrible. This is really bad. This is boots on the ground. So this is just a few minutes ago. What do you make of this, Nick?

CHAPTER 16 / 28 Discussion

The Incremental Draw into a Middle Eastern Disaster

Nick Fuentes describes a step-by-step process where the U.S. is being "dragged" into an unthinkable scenario in Iran. He notes that as Iran responds to strikes by closing the Strait of Hormuz and depleting U.S. missile interceptors, the pressure for a full-scale ground invasion increases. Fuentes directs listeners to his Rumble channel for further analysis as the situation escalates.

iran· strait of hormuz· oil trade· interceptors· nick fuentes· rumble

51:07 Well, it's like I said, we're being drawn in here. That is really the operative word. Nobody wants this, it's not in our interest. We are being slowly drawn in. And what that implies is that step by step, we're being dragged further into this. And that's always what happens. It always starts with, we're just putting maximum pressure sanctions. Well, we just killed Qasem Soleimani. Well, we just back to cyber attack. It's always we just did this this one time. And all it does is increase our liability. It just increases our stake in this disaster. And so it was very obvious. Okay, we go in with the bombs really hard. We destroy the Navy. We destroy the missile launch platforms. Okay, well, then you get this logic like, well, you break it, you bought it. Now Iran inevitably is gonna keep throwing missiles at us. We're running out of interceptors. So what do you do now? Iran is gonna close the Strait of Hormuz. That's gonna shut down 20% of the oil trade.

52:02 What do you do now? Again, you're being drawn in step by step and our share of this, our stake in this is always increasing until you wake up and you find you're in this unthinkable scenario. So that's why I say I don't know that we can rule out boots on the ground in the future. But that's the plan. People go, oh, the executive order just says they'll protect the ships. Yeah, they're gonna do it with troops. I already saw it. People, we got a whole other hour coming up about how people find you, Nick. I am at rumble, rumble.com slash Nick J Fuentes. I'm live every weeknight and I'm on Twitter, Nick J Fuentes as well. The state receiver is refusing to pay the internet bills, refusing to keep the company open. So it looks like we're shutting down this month towards the end of the month. We have the backup network. Just be ready people. Please survive so much. Don't take it serious. Just get ready to share. Here's where Alex is at.

52:58 Cause I don't cry wolf. I just survive a long time. We'll be right back with our number four. I'm making this announcement on Tuesday, March 3rd, 2026. You have until the 17th of March to take advantage of the March mega sale at the Alex Jones store.com. This is one of the biggest sales of the year yet up to 40% off store wide. 25% off on the shirts, on the hats, 10% off on things like the collectible knives, and up to 40% off on supplements like Ultramethylene Blue. And the more you buy, the more you save. These are incredible products. You've seen the rave reviews. You've seen the five-star reviews. These are the very best game-changing supplements available, period. Again, I only sell things that really work.

CHAPTER 17 / 28 Discussion

Political Leverage and the Failure of Trump's First Term Personnel

The discussion turns to whether any leverage remains to move Donald Trump away from his current military course. Nick Fuentes expresses pessimism, noting that similar attempts to influence Trump's personnel and policy failed during his first term. He argues that the Republican Party must suffer a loss in 2026 to be "reborn" and suggests that a "loyalty pledge" against neoconservative policies should be a litmus test for future candidates.

donald trump· aipac· mike cernovich· qasem soleimani· gop· 2028 election

57:23 Those are literal Roman bread and circuses the Romans wrote about to distract their men not to be politically involved. My cerebral cortex is focused on politics. So I have a lot of facts, a lot of overlaying information in history. This is a short segment, long segment coming up with Nick Fuentes. But it's so frustrating to actually know how this works and see what's moving on the chessboard. And it's not in America's interest or anybody's interest, but tyrants to understand the historical danger of all of this. And I don't really have words, Nick, to talk about when you look out second order, third order, fourth order consequences of this, why privately the chairman of the Joint Chiefs told Trump don't do it, Eric Prince, many others. And we have Trump and JD Vance and compilations saying we're not gonna go to boots on the ground, we're not gonna go to regime change. They're doing it. Can you speak to

58:20 what you predict happens down this road we're going and just there's got to be other ways of leverage. If we can't leverage Trump, who do we put pressure on in Congress to stop this or is AIPAC too powerful? I think what has been set in motion cannot be stopped at this point. I think that the time to do it would have been in 24. And everybody reassured us that if Trump won, well, we would pressure Trump later. I remember Mike Cernovich said that. He said, well, this is how politics works. You don't know how politics works. I do.

58:55 He said, you gotta get Trump elected, and then we're gonna work in the admin and we're gonna fight the personnel and blah, blah. And I know we've had this conversation, this is always my refrain. It's like, we tried that, we did that, we did that in the first term. And by the way, how did the first term end? Trump ripped up the 2018 nuclear deal. In 2019, we're effectively in a war with Iran. In 2020, he kills Qasem Soleimani. We're shooting down drones, they're attacking tankers. You can Google it. There's an article, I believe it was in December 2020. Trump actually ordered the military to attack Iran, or at least was considering it in the lame duck session. And it was only his generals that discouraged him from doing it. So it's like, this is deja vu all over again. We live this and we tried all that. The personnel, the voting, the Twitter campaign, the hashtags. And I think that now Trump is gonna do what Trump is gonna do. And Trump, who knows why,

59:53 blackmail, persuasion, whatever. Those people are around him. It's ego. You said it now, it's ego. It's ego, certainly, whatever it is, that's what we're stuck with. And I think that if you wanna really get it to stop, you just gotta switch up and play both sides. You gotta play both sides and go Democrat. I don't wanna do it. I don't like the Democrats. I fully understand what they represent, but what else can you do to the Republicans? All that other stuff is flaccid. Protest, tweet about it. They know if you are gonna vote in November that you're really not serious. You're gonna go and rah, rah, rah, hold up the sign. But as long as they get your vote in the end, I mean, honestly, what difference does it make for them? There's a little less enthusiasm, they don't care.

1:00:39 I'm really, like I said, I think that we actually have to think beyond this. And we have to think the only way out of it is 28. How do we relight the flame in 28? That's all I care about. And for that to happen, maybe there needs to be a little pain. The current GOP has to suffer a little bit for it to be reborn in 28. But it's not gonna be Vance and Rubio that save the day, obviously, based on this. So I really- Well, I would say this, I may agree with you if we say we're not gonna accept We're not going to support it. I would almost call it a candidate by candidate basis. And then if somebody is a neocon or we do a litmus test, if they support this, they should be voted for. I almost see it as like a loyalty pledge. But let's come back because the French are sending aircraft carrier to protect the

CHAPTER 18 / 28 Discussion

Escalation in the Suez Canal and Strait of Hormuz

France is reportedly sending an aircraft carrier to the Suez Canal, while the U.S. prepares to escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz. This follows the closure of the strait by insurance companies after Iranian attacks on several vessels. Senator Lindsey Graham is noted for his enthusiastic support of these escalations, which critics view as a betrayal of Trump's original non-interventionist campaign promises.

suez canal· strait of hormuz· france· lindsey graham· jd vance· insurance companies

1:01:28 one of the main corridors there, Suez Canal. And Trump is now basically saying they're gonna send in US ships into the Strait of Hormuz, which is a total trap. We'll be right back in 60 seconds. I don't want people to miss the historic point we're at right now. The fourth turning, the end of the old order, the populist revolutions happening everywhere. And then Trump betraying what he said he would do. I have compilations of him saying no boots on the ground, no full war. And here we are, and it's all unraveling in real time. The Strait of Hormuz has already been closed by insurance companies after Iran began to attack ships and blew up and sunk a few in the last three days.

1:02:10 And now Trump signs an executive order saying, we'll do whatever we have to for open shipping. We'll put troops on the ground on the Strait of Hormuz on their side. We're gonna have military escorts through there. The announcements are being made off his plan. I mean, this is escalating to the next level immediately. And this is why Eric Prince and the chairman of Joint Chiefs and others told Trump, Iran's not gonna give up. You're not gonna get regime change, you have 99% chance right away. You're not gonna get in four weeks or six weeks or a year. Now they're prepping us for just an endless war. So now we're against Europe with its plan to prop itself up with it was war with Russia. And now America has his plan for this. We didn't vote for this. We didn't sign up for this. And again, oh, they might've attacked us when Israel attacked him said Rubio yesterday. So we had to attack them. And when they hit our ships, which Iran knew

1:03:10 Then they hit a few ships, they close it with insurance. Then they send in the US ships. Then the Iranians attack those ships. And they'll go, oh my God, they attacked us. All we're doing is blowing them up. And then now Trump says we gotta put troops on the other side of the Strait of Hormuz to protect this. I said it the first hour, it's happening in live time. Nick, this is like a bad dream. It is, it feels surreal. I still can't even believe it, even though I've been predicting it and even though we're watching it, I wake up and I see the news we are at war with Iran. And for people that are not paying attention to all this stuff, again, it cannot be overstated. This is like, it's literally the neocon nightmare scenario, like war with Iraq, Syria, now Iran. You just go like- This is the ghost of the neocons possessing us. This is their wet dream.

1:03:59 Yes, and for Trump to be the one delivering it, that's the most surreal aspect of all of it. You could see a DeSantis doing this. You could see a Kamala Harris doing this, honestly. But to see Donald Trump on Friday, on Friday night at Mar-a-Lago with the hat on, with the black curtain announcing this war, building the case against the Iranian regime, you go, what happened? What happened to this movement? I mean, you and I, we've been with Trump really since the beginning, since 2015. And when he came down the escalator, his first big move was basically to destroy this Republican support for war and the war in Iraq in particular repudiate that whole legacy of the Bush dynasty, George Bush, Jeb Bush. And so for him now to be doing this, it really feels like it's come full circle. And we have Lindsey Graham having orgasms on television. That too.

1:04:53 Yeah, Lindsey Graham's a huge fan of this. Well, endorsed by Trump, endorsed by Trump. So I mean, again, this is my frustration. The signs were all there. JD Vance said at the Republican Convention in 2024, we need to bomb Iran really hard. And Trump endorsed Lindsey Graham. This time he endorsed him six years ago. And Trump got up, you remember, during the election And he said, if Iran takes me out, then we're gonna wipe Iran off the map. All of this was telegraphed from the beginning. And really, you know who I blame, sadly? I blame the so-called plan trusters. I know that you were more bullish on Trump, but you acknowledged these were legitimate concerns. There were a lot of people that said, no, those are all-

CHAPTER 19 / 28 Discussion

Personal Persecution and the Search for a Political Off-Ramp

Alex Jones describes his personal legal struggles, including subpoenas related to "Arctic Frost" and investigations by Jack Smith. He expresses heartbreak over the current direction of the Trump administration, stating he "needed Trump to be real" to save the country. Jones admits he is looking for an "off-ramp" from his previous total support as he realizes the administration may be sinking by its own doing.

alex jones· jack smith· arctic frost· hbo· justice department· hopium

1:05:40 You've been righter than me on this, and I'm not always right, I'm right about 90% of the time. I've been very honest. So I'm gonna now mea culpa here, because when I'm wrong, I'm gonna say it publicly. I needed Trump to be real. And so much good stuff, the carbon tax, you gotta go for an hour. And it's still better than that, but you can't have one or two evils. I have the Democrats trying to put me in prison. I just got subpoenaed again to defend, when I got Arctic Frost, I gotta go to Congress and provide my documents because they're going after Jack Smith. So the Democrats are trying to put me in prison. They run show trials on HBO.

1:06:17 So obviously it's not gonna be paid off by Trump. I've been persecuted for supporting him. So I want to now pay out on this. I want to save the country, secure the border, find the missing kids. I want to believe. But I'm not an occult. I'm not delusional. So I was like, I'm critical. I'm critical. This is overall good. And now I'm just like, now I'm having to think of the off-ramp. Nick we've got this probably you know you're targeted to try to kill your house. This is where we're your name's Nick J. Fointest I'm Alex E Jones. We're real people we're under attack so we're in the real world you you do what you think's right I do what I think's right you're not paid by people I'm not we're just our fans so to me I needed Trump as my my lifeboat may not be perfect but it's the lifeboat I've got and I'm watching it sink by its own doing and and so this is horrifying and and so

1:07:06 But I can't sign on to covering up Epstein. I can't sign on to World War III. And so that's why I tried to promote the optimism because I fucking need this, man. Like, I want to fix the country. I want to turn it around. So it's not that I was delusional. And I still hope we can turn it around. But I just, sorry, go ahead. Just hear what I'm saying. I get it. I get it. And I, listen, like I said, I don't think that everybody that supported Trump was being dismissive about these concerns. I get it, we all wanted to believe. I was 18 years old when Trump ran in 2016. And I remember getting in fights with people. This is my whole life too. At 18 years old, I wore the MAGA hat at Boston University, one of the most liberal campuses in the country and became a pariah on my college campus. It's sad to see something you sacrificed. It's sad to see somebody you fought and bled for die.

1:08:02 Yeah, and you know, that's my whole adult life. I know that's a huge part of your life also. And now we're witnessing it's totally unraveling. It's an utter and complete betrayal. It's heartbreaking in many ways. And when I try to salvage it with people, I get attacked as a liberal, which is a complete, when these people doing that don't even can't even find Iran on a fucking map. Yeah, well, what's called for is for us to be sober minded about the entire thing, you know, because there's a lot of realists all time but was hoping and now I'm just not even hoping I'm just going to be a realist. Yeah, I mean, and really, it's okay to have hope. I mean, we hope for a better future, but we got to be brutally honest about what this administration has become. It's like, you know, I saw this game play out in the first term. And I remember I went to DC in 2018. I met with people from the admin and me being like 20. I was like, is Q real? Are

1:08:59 Are we, is there a plan? Is there a five dimensional chess? Are we, is this all like gonna end in building a wall and so on? And they looked at each other and they laughed in my face. And they said, bro, I said, it is worse than you could possibly imagine. They said-. I've been at the top of the Justice Department and they literally just, they laughed at me and they said, no, we mean well, but you have no idea how bad it is. Exact same thing. Yeah, and anyone will tell you that. Anyone from Trump 1, any of the good guys from Trump 1, any of the people in Trump 2, they will tell you the exact same thing. It is brutal. And I will not come on air and lie to my audience about the situation because I believe in them. If they know how desperate it is again, we will rise the occasion. I mean, I'm not going to sell hopium. It's just that clear.

CHAPTER 20 / 28 Discussion

The Lack of a MAGA Succession Bench

The conversation highlights the failure of the Trump movement to build a lasting institutional "bench" of younger leaders. Figures like Madison Cawthorn and Matt Gaetz are cited as examples of "America First" politicians who were marginalized by the GOP establishment. Trump's reliance on the "old guard" for personnel is seen as a primary reason for the movement's current backsliding into traditional neoconservative policies.

donald trump· madison cawthorn· matt gaetz· marjorie taylor greene· tea party· rinos

1:09:46 And it's tough. I mean, it's tough because what other you're right. I mean, what other option do we have? That's really the question. People say, well, what else is there? Well, I said, I'm so sad to have to start turning loose of something with that so much potential. Yeah, well, not only that grandma dying or something. Well, it's sort of literally, I mean, he's kind of getting up there. So it is, it's very tragic and sad. And sadly, there's no alternative. I think it would be a little bit easier on all of us if there was any underclassmen here. That's the worst part. Exactly, I was about to say, there's no stable of new horses here.

1:10:26 Yeah, and I see that as a big failure of Trump because it should have been a whole new stable. It should have been a new generation of MAGA congressmen and senators, like where's our AOC? Well, they all got cannibalized. Madison Cawthorn got destroyed by the Republicans. Matt Gaetz got destroyed by the Republicans. Marjorie Greene got, so you had a few of them, got a few of them, not as many as you should have been. And the annual memory gets vaporized by Suzy Walls. Yeah, Susan, I confirmed three months ago with Flynn. He showed me the stuff. They're running opposition on hundreds of people. Flynn, myself, by the way, you, I told you this. They're running major opposition research on not the Democrats, but on us because they know we're true. That's another level of this. How's that?

1:11:12 People have no idea, but that has always been the struggle inside the GOP. That is always how it's been, which is that the establishment is always at war with its own base. This happened with the Tea Party. It's fratricide. I don't even know that it's fratricide because these people aren't even like us. You know, these people that like- No, I agree, but we're the real deal and they're, what does the doppelganger always do? The thing or the body snatcher, he kills the real thing. Exactly. It's an invasion of the body snatchers. So they're the body snatchers. You're right. It's not a fraternized. The body snatchers want to get rid of the real one.

1:11:48 Yeah, it's that skin suit. They take the organic mass movement, they try to mimic it as best as possible, and then they eliminate the actual movement. That was the Tea Party. I just talked to Michelle Malkin this week, and she said, we ran the same playbook 20 years ago. We ran the same playbook in 2006 when we would campaign against the RINOs in favor Yeah, I know you guys The crews tell me about clips. I was listening to you. They were like Alex You're supposed to reveal this big white house thing was holding a segment. I was listening to you. Sorry go ahead Yeah, so this has been a multi-generational struggle. You go back to the John Birchers and National Review, you could go back to the paleocons and the neocons, Pat Buchanan, Sam Francis, Joseph Sobran versus the neocons, Tea Party, right up through to the Trump movement. And I always sort of knew in 20, right around 2018, 2019,

1:12:42 that the biggest gap is that Trump is not an institutionalist or an institutionalizer. He is actually not going to create the so-called movement conservatism of the Trump generation, who's gonna fill in the gaps? It's all the same people, it's all the same money. What you said is beyond key. His strength is he's not institutional, but when he leaves, that's our greatest weakness because there's nothing staying, there's nothing left there. Exactly, and that's why it's now backsliding. The personnel, there is no cadre of radical Trump supporters to fill up this White House. He still has to rely on the old guard. Yeah, look at Iran in a good way, a bad way. They've got even more radicals below, so they knock out the elite. It doesn't matter. They just get stronger. With us, there's no second bench.

CHAPTER 21 / 28 Discussion

Trump's Ego and the Suppression of New Leaders

Donald Trump is criticized for an "ego thing" that prevents him from elevating other strong leaders within the MAGA movement. His recent comments distancing himself from figures like Tucker Carlson and Thomas Massie are presented as evidence of this trend. Furthermore, his handling of the Epstein files is characterized as a power play to protect "scumbags" rather than a genuine effort at transparency.

donald trump· tucker carlson· megyn kelly· thomas massie· epstein· baby boomers

1:13:31 Yeah, there's no bench at all. Trump said it himself today. He said I'm MAGA, not Tucker, not Megyn Kelly. He said it's just me. And you go really? So it's not Tucker, it's not Marjorie, it's not Thomas Massey. It's just you and your war with Iran and your F-State files. And by the way, any real thinker, I've told you probably, Nick, I respect you disagree with something you say, but you're a leader, you care. I'm like, you're the future, Nick. We're counting on you. A real leader immediately recognizes younger that are gonna lead the people of the future. That's what a tribal leader does. With Trump, it's this ego thing where anybody else being strong is bad. And as he gets older, it's worse, it's sick.

1:14:09 That's like a boomer thing. That's the baby boomers or he's 1946. This is like a baby boomer thing. They will not like let us have anything. They're hoarding the wealth. They're hoarding these like fiefdoms. You're right, it is an ego thing. And at the end of the day, that is really his issue. Nobody wants to admit it. It's actually brave of you to say that because that's a huge thing. A lot of people say, oh, it's his advisors. He's getting bad advice. It's his personnel. him. No, I said back in March, it's him coming out of Epstein all because he loves the power of protecting all these scumbags. He's not involved. He loves the power over him. He's not even in the blackmail he used in general. I'll take care of it. Bullshit you will man. And that's my concern is how do I not go totally psychotic and go all out anti-Trump because I still want to get Republicans elected because they're better. That's a real needle to thread here. That's what I'm trying to do, Nick.

1:15:02 It's tough. Like you said, I mean, because we're also trying to stay out of jail. You know, we were literally between Iraq and a hard place. The Democrats want to kill us and flood the country with immigrants. The Republicans want to send us to die for Israel. So you go, okay, well, I mean, it's really hard to win here. Oh, Tom Blanch, let me tell you, to be clear, they're trying to figure out how to put several hundred of us just to confirm insiders. They told Flynn, They're trying to put us in jail, bro. We don't have three years anymore. We have Todd Blanch trying to do it now. Under what pretext? Just like they opened a national security investigation under Obama in 2013. They got the FBI. We know because the FBI doesn't like it. As bad as they are, they're like, what is this? Really? They got jihadis, sleeper cells. They are literally over 200 people. They have FBI

CHAPTER 22 / 28 Discussion

Federal Surveillance of "Loyal Americans" and the GOP as Enemy

Reports suggest that the FBI and Pentagon have been tasked with conducting "national security drag nets" on prominent American activists rather than foreign threats. Names like General Flynn, Nick Fuentes, and Alex Jones are allegedly at the top of opposition research files managed by the Republican establishment. The GOP is described as the "biggest enemy" of its own base, often turning its resources inward to eliminate authentic populist movements.

fbi· pentagon· general flynn· ed martin· somali· national security

1:15:56 National security drag nets going on us right now. When I said opposition research, that's just the name of it. No, no, no. They have the Republican Party is now looking at all of us that have any soul and they see us as the enemy. We got to get out of Dodge, man. I don't know what country you're dropping in at, but. That's, that's the saddest part. You know, the whole country's coming down, the GOP is coming down. It's, it's hard to kind of figure out what that next move is. That's why for me, I just keep my options up. The army and then, and then the defense intelligence, he got confirmed. He won't give me classified stuff. And they're like, sir, they got a whole opposition thing that to take us down and you're at the top of the, this is a bunch of names. And he's like, so yeah, no, no, they're, they're literally

1:16:38 Not worried about Democrats, they're gonna put them in jail. They're literally worried about loyal Americans. And to the Pentagon's credit, they're like, this is bullshit. Like I've had all these Delta Force current guys, all of them call me, thank you, we're not gonna go along with this. They're all freaking out, which is the good news. They have the Pentagon, bro, tasked to spy on us as the enemy when we're the real Americans. I mean, imagine the wake up call in Tampa that they're like, we're not tasked for Muslims, we're tasked for Nick Fuentes and General Flynn and Alex Jones. Yeah, just give you that newsflash. Yeah, well that's the story of the admin, you know, Bill Clinton is being protected, Hillary, Obama, you know, that's what I'm saying. Like it's always this cope like, well, here's how Trump can still win. You're right, because we learned this the last 60 days. I told you this on the phone, I don't know if it got through as I talk fast. Dude, we're the focus because they know we're not sellouts.

1:17:31 They're like looking, we got it all, we got Trump under control, who will block us? And they're literally getting rid of Ed Martin, creating files on us. And they're pissed because there's nothing there. What, like your most decadent actions were getting a pizza, right? That's your big party. Exactly, me too. I mean, that's a pitiful thing. I mean, you're getting a steak or whatever. They literally though are enraged because they can't find anything on us. They won't charge the Muslims, they won't charge the Somali stealing billions. But literally, the eye of the White House is on us because they're worried we'll influence Trump. That's how it's always been. The GOP has always been cannibalizing the authentic base. That's just it. And that's why I've always said the GOP is really our biggest enemy. It's not even the Democrats because at least the Democrats are the devil you know. And you

1:18:22 And you know that they're your enemy, but it's always these Republicans. They say we're gonna take the fight, hold the line, all this. And then they always turn the cannons inward and shoot at their own people. That has always been the story. So I tell my followers, take your own side. The GOP is not looking out for you. They're not fighting your enemies. They're not securing advantages for you. America first in our America survival. In fact, I'm gonna start the America survival party. America first is great, America only. How about America survival? We need to understand it's up to us. Nobody's coming to save us. That's yeah, and that's what people got to get through their heads is it's not going to be a top down thing. It's going to be incumbent on all of us to get involved, getting involved in government, getting involved in the universities and the private sector because yeah, obviously we tried it with Trump. People say you're not going to vote your way out of this. Surely we're not going to solve it just by electing the right president and expecting everything to flow from the top down. It doesn't work that way. So I agree with you completely. It's

1:19:27 It's a shame because we had an opportunity here. Like you said, we really had a major opportunity. Trump won the popular vote for crying out loud on a platform of mass deportations and everything. And what it has secured is a corporate tax cut for the rich, a war for Israel, Epstein cover up. You go, okay, so what are we doing here? What does it profit us actually to even participate in the charade? So I'm interested in a revolutionary change or nothing at all. And I know A lot of people don't like that. A lot of people think that's extreme and they remind me, yeah, well, if the Democrats get in then this, that and the other. I'm interested in either we get the change or we don't. But if the Republicans are marginally-. Right, right. And I respect your stuff is super accurate. So I respect accuracy. But we should still try to think of leverage points

CHAPTER 23 / 28 Discussion

Forever War Rhetoric and the Betrayal of the Escalator Speech

Donald Trump's recent rhetoric is compared to the "forever war" concept from George Orwell's 1984. Despite his 2015 campaign being built on the rejection of the Iraq War, his current administration is accused of pursuing an identical path in Iran. Critics argue that even if Trump's "forever war" comments are mere bluffing, the Pentagon will use the opening to establish a 20-year conflict similar to Afghanistan.

donald trump· reuters· 1984· iraq war· china· pentagon

1:20:23 Cuz Trump did shut up when he kept saying vaccines are great with Bill O'Reilly and stuff until a few years ago. He finally shut up and brought in Kennedy, they've done some good. He never admits guilt, but sometimes he'll back off. I think we shouldn't give up yet. How do we put pressure on Trump to pull out of this insanity? Cuz we gotta try even if it's impossible. I mean, the most you could do is express your dissatisfaction. I don't know that there's gonna be a million man march anytime soon. Honestly, I think the war is actually, they say it's not that popular, but I think people are apathetic. So what do you do to pressure Trump? I mean, you can call your congressman and your congressman can take it up with Mike Johnson or something. But I think all we could do is really buckle up and we can wait for this to wash over us.

1:21:15 I think at the minimum, you just make it clear we're not on board. I mean, burn your MAGA hats. I've tried it. I went out to a little bit to Michigan in 24 to try to get people not to vote and try to get some attention. We bombarded True Social, we bombarded Twitter. It didn't do any good. They're not listening. I want to get good Republicans elected. I'm doing this to get their attention. They spun it. You were actually trying to stop votes. I got some horrible news for radio listeners. TV viewers just saw it. Just like I said at the start of the show, Trump has now announced forever war. Now we're not talking about a Hollywood movie with Tom Cruise. We're talking about, he just said 1984 forever war, Reuters. They're printing the article now. What the hell is that Nick Fuentes? I mean, this is just, it's like Trump is an old barn burning down in lifetime.

1:22:08 Yeah, it's a sight to behold, especially for us. I think that a lot of people got red pilled after the pandemic. Maybe they don't realize the gravity of this, but this is just like, what else is there even to say? I mean, at this point, this is the same guy that came down the escalator and said the war in Iraq was a big mistake. We should have never been there. We knew they had no weapons of mass destruction. And now he says we're fighting a forever war against Iran for regime change. You just have to shake your head and you wonder how people are still on board. That's honestly the worst part as you go on Twitter and people are still making excuses. They say, it's about China. Well, we'll wait until there's boots on the ground. You go, really? I mean, I don't know what people need to see for them to realize that we got tricked, we got betrayed. Now we need to try something else. But yeah, it's shocking to hear these things. He goes, I don't have the yips about boots on the ground. You don't have the yips.

1:23:04 We're gonna deploy to the Middle East again, seriously? And then they say we can go indefinitely, we're gonna fight forever? Now in fairness, I think that when he says that, that is rhetoric. And that- No, obviously it just sounds strong, but the point is, it's antithetical to what he ran on. Right. I mean, because that's what the Pentagon wants, is a 20 year war like Afghanistan that's just a big money maker. It is, it is antithetical. And here's the thing, Trump can gesture and bluff all he wants, but we are in the war and we're getting drawn in. So the problem with those kinds of things is the Pentagon is gonna take that and run with it. You give them an inch, they're gonna take a mile. Let's be clear, let's go, I'm not gonna talk about this. It just blew me away.

CHAPTER 24 / 28 Discussion

Authenticity in Media and the Meritocracy of Truth

Alex Jones reflects on his ancestry and his commitment to a "meritocracy" of truth-telling, claiming he is not controlled by any handlers or "slaves" to a power structure. Nick Fuentes agrees, stating that their "secret ingredient" is authenticity and the ability to be "right" about geopolitical events. They argue that their fanatical following exists because the public can sense when they are being told the unvarnished truth.

alex jones· nick fuentes· william the conqueror· gresham· live streaming· authenticity

1:26:33 And then there's people that do what's right and don't think about the consequences because it's spiritual ingrained in them to do the right thing. And you gotta have a fourth group that are good but are scared to tell the truth. And you can add a lot of other groups, subgroups to that. But people always ask who pays you, who does this? I sell you stuff straight up, supplements, books, t-shirts, whatever. It's all great stuff. But I love the truth. I love humanity. I am a good person. My ancestors were good. I never really thought I was gonna get older, but I'm like measuring up to them. I never really talk about my ancestors because it's like I'm gonna live off them, but it's ridiculous. I'm all the way back to William the Conqueror and the old kings of England and the inventor of the stock exchange and the Gresham's just on my mom's side. And then they all got kicked out, so they went to the New World, do their own deal, and the Mayflower and my dad's side, all of it. But I'm doing this myself. This is me. This is my time. Alex Jones did this.

1:27:34 with you. So I don't live in some class thing where it's off my name. This is a meritocracy. In the meritocracy, I've kicked some ass. And then I look at people in the political system, left, right, you name it, that just go with what will get them ahead, but they don't think about the second, third, fourth order of things. Well, I'll tell you the sixth or seventh order. And in historical mathematics and political equations, politics is math. You add it all together, Doing what's right and not thinking about all the different permutations is the most sophisticated thing and the most powerful always. So I can think through all these levels and get lost in it for hours and do incredible things consciously, but just being good and doing what's right, I always see God's plan in the end was the most advanced thinking.

1:28:29 And Nick, I think it's important to state that because I can tell and I know you're ready for your show up. So you're right for it here. You know, you're just reading, researching. Nobody's telling you what to say. There's no handler. When they've sued me, the Democrats and their big law firms, they're always like, who's the boss? Where's the money? Who tells you what to say? They cannot believe for years until until they depose the whole crew, like who tells you what to say? They don't even get like this is real, because for them, they're slaves. It's all handed down to them, every fucking word they say. So speak to authenticity. If you say what you want, my next point is, you are your own man. You're not a fed, you're not controlled. You're your own 26, 27, 28, whatever it is now, young man. And that very idea threatens them that there's so much native talent that God gave us through our species.

1:29:13 Well, that's the thing. They're now trying to reverse engineer me. In the past year, they saw my clips go viral. They saw the show blow up. And now they're all trying to reverse engineer. And they want to say, well, what is the secret ingredient? Why aren't people listening to this guy? And in many ways, I'm sure they did the same with you. It's authenticity and native intelligence. Well, they try to characterize it and they say, well, it's cuz they're edge lording or they're offering something sensational or it's all different types of things. And they're always looking at it on the cosmetic level. But what they're missing is that we are real and people can tell. We are trying to do our best. We are trying to tell the truth. We are guided by our conscience. And people can pick up on that. You're a live streamer in a sense.

1:29:57 You're on radio. I'm more of like a, I guess we're both in live streaming. I've been live streaming since it started. Yeah. But you can't hide. You can't hide on a live stream. When you do a show for three hours a day, every day for 20 years, you know, and I've done it for 10 years, there's nowhere to hide on that. Eventually people can pick up on it. Yeah, people ask how do you have energy? Cause they got to calculate everything in two minutes. No, the answer is I don't calculate how I look. I already know what's true. Exactly. There's no energy to bullshit when you're on the air four hours a day. Exactly, there's no pretense, there's no facade, there's nothing like that. And that's what people like, people are sick of being lied to. People are kind of dumb, but they can tell when they're being lied to sometimes. And I think that the basis of our appeal, or at least the reason why we have a fanatical following, people that follow us really follow us, it's because there is that connection. They're tapped into the same thing that we are. I think you're right, overall you're right. But the big thing is you're right.

1:30:51 You've been right like 99% of the time, Nick. That's why they do. I mean, sure, your jokes are funny. You know, you're a good-looking guy. You're witty. I edge lord too. It's fun. But it's unscripted. But at the end of the day, it's being right. They wouldn't want... You would not be successful if you were not correct. That's the final ingredient is being right. That's what they don't like. The bad guys hate the fact that we're smart, we figured them out, and we're right, and they know it. And if people listen to us, they'll learn how we know. We tell them the secrets, how we know it, and we tell them it's game over. That's why I keep harping, look how accurate I am. I said Saturday afternoon, 3 PM, I bet there's a sleeper cell Muslim attack. And I bet it happens tonight, probably Austin, Texas or Dallas or Houston, it happened. It just, people ask, how did I know that? It's just, I can just see all the pieces.

CHAPTER 25 / 28 Discussion

Restraining Israel and the Future of U.S. Foreign Policy

The discussion focuses on the need for a U.S. movement that can effectively restrain Israel's influence on American foreign policy. Nick Fuentes argues that it is in the interest of both Washington and Tehran to make a deal, but Israeli interference prevents peace. He suggests that the U.S. should use its military and financial leverage to force Israel to comply with American diplomatic goals.

israel· tehran· mahatma gandhi· anti-semitism· national security council· diplomacy

1:31:44 You're right, it's the truth. Fundamentally, it's the truth. And that's our biggest secret weapon I think that we have. So where does this go forward? I wanna play a few clips of the Zionist greater Israel. Anything you wanna say, just say it now, because I've been asked the question. You're very nice. I've told you be aggressive like you're on your own show. You're very deferential on mine. Give us 10 minutes of just, however long you want. Nick Fuentes on leash. Vic Fuentes unleashed. Well, to me this entire debacle with Iran, it has to go somewhere. I'm with you when you say, how do we pressure Trump to stop? Although I am pessimistic that we can get Trump to change course, this does have to give way to something. It does have to generate action. And I continue to believe that the only action that is

1:32:30 you know, really gonna work that is possible is that we have to switch up the voting. I really believe that. Like my playbook right now when I look at this Iran thing, all this does is make me more confident that I was right in 24. Because my pitch in 24- Listen, I love Jeff McGuinness, but he said something actually very profound. He goes, Trump's got us by the balls, I'm his bench basically. Well, I don't wanna be in that position. Exactly, exactly. So you need options. You don't want to be somebody's bitch. You need options. You need to be able to walk away from the table. And what allows you to walk away from the table is if you have another option. You have somebody else to go to. And the Republican Party is like a woman. And I don't want to be mean to women, but it's just funny when you tell a woman, I'm done, you're not in charge, they kiss your ass. As soon as you kiss their ass, you're in the doghouse.

1:33:12 Yeah, that's a weird psychology. It's any negotiation. Any negotiation is like that. It's all a power dynamic. It's all about the coincidence of wants. And so they want our votes. We want them to work for us. If they don't work for us, we can't give them our votes. And if we're not going to give them our votes, what we should just throw them to the other side. How obvious is it with Israel? I get Israel swinging its dick around to piss everybody off. But what about Israel bragging they run us here domestically? That's not good. What's the chutzpah point? Yeah, so I think that Tucker might be on to something when he says that the reason they do this is because they want actually to bait and incite people to freak out. And then, and there's sort of like a subtle distinction here, then certain groups can say, oh, there's all this anti-Semitism and people usually stop there. But you got to consider

1:34:03 The Jewry in Israel is distinct, although related to the Jewry in America. The Jews in Israel, I think their desire is to see the American Jews move there. I think their desire is to see American... 100%. Yeah, they see themselves as the ubermenschen. Yes, and so I think it is in their interest to generate Jewish nationalism and Jewish nationalism is a response to anti-Semitism. That's why Israel bombed Baghdad, bombed Madrid in the 50s to make Jews and blamed it on communists to make a move to Israel. Exactly, exactly. And similarly in America, all these so-called anti-Semitism is pushing the American Jewish community into the arms of Israel, either moving there or supporting them or, you know, getting involved in activism. So I think to the extent that there's a play there, I think that's pretty clearly what it is. There's a symbiotic relationship. Well, look at Israel.

1:34:57 Funds Al-Qaeda, funds Hamas, creates them all that, the elements running it. And I'm not saying do this because I couldn't do it either, but and the Muslims obviously on average are so emotional so it's like it's impossible, but if they Mahatma Gandhi or Martin Luther Kingdom or Jesus Christ them, Jesus didn't want to do it. Imagine if no one fought Israel and everybody just stopped. Well, then Israel would just stage stuff and say they did it. So it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. They would just blow stuff up and say they did it. I mean, it's just, but what if you could get everybody to stop fighting Israel? That would be the key to shutting it down. See, I don't know if that's the case, if it's just a matter of getting them to stop fighting. I think that- No, no, but you know what I'm saying. They fund the radical Muslims to get attacked and stood down on August 7th. Obviously, it's academic what I'm saying. It's not gonna happen. Right.

1:35:47 Yeah, I think the solution is that we need a movement that is actually restraining Israel. Like it needs to go further in the sense that... Yeah, that shows you what they're scared of. They got 20 states or 23 to pass laws that if your city does condemns Israel and genocide, they don't get state funds. That's unconstitutional. Exactly. They're really worried about boycotts. Well, and in particular in the national security apparatus. They don't want anybody in the National Security Council or the Pentagon that is going to tell the president you need to restrain Israel because they're driving the conflict. I said it on my show the other night.

1:36:24 If it was up to Washington and Tehran, they would have made a deal because it's in both of their interests and there is enough overlap there. It is Israel that doesn't want the peace. So what's the answer? The United States needs to use its leverage over Israel and say, look, we pay for your military. We protect you from sanctions and from the UN and the rest of it. You have to do what we say. You have to listen to us. You're not going to go into Iran alone. You're not going to sabotage our diplomacy. You're not going to go out there with these provocative statements and threaten Iran while we're trying to make a deal. And if you wanted to actually have peace, if Tehran and Washington were to make a deal, that is the necessary step. As a matter of fact, that's the only step. No, I agree. So let me say this, because I said before you came on, I was going to say this and I didn't. Maybe I'll shoot a special report today because I have a lot of sources. I don't want to give them up. A lot of it came out in the newsletter, so I can say it now.

CHAPTER 26 / 28 Discussion

Trump as an "Errand Boy" and the Midterm Strategy

Donald Trump is accused of being an "errand boy" for Israel, with his current foreign policy described as "schizophrenic" due to internal firestorms at the White House. If Trump has forfeited his "America First" mandate, critics argue his government must be impeded through a Democratic victory in the midterms. This would lead to a cycle of investigations and subpoenas that could halt the march toward war.

donald trump· israel· pentagon· midterms· subpoenas· foreign policy

1:37:12 Trump's doing face-saving right now saying no, I I made Israel attack first when the Pentagon's like no We didn't want to tag during the day and Rubio's like yeah, they did it. Sorry. They're all freaked out about this I know the chairman told him privately he came on the news. This is bad idea. Don't do it Well, we'll follow your order though, sir, but here's you know, 70% bad options. Yeah, we say don't do it then I confirm with others That that that that Israel basically Trump was like leaning on not doing the attacks so they did this now Trump is face saving because he wants to obviously do that and That Trump got really pissed off. There's photos of him screaming and heck Seth. I think overall is a good guy but

1:37:51 The bottom line is that I've confirmed that Israel is basically in control of our foreign policy by our own posture to be allied with them. And that is uncontrovertible, cuz now they're trying to damage control. No, Trump gave the order. No, our very doctrine is if Israel's attacked, we attack. And so thank God Russia's not following its agreement with Iran or China or we'd be in war with them right now. So it is a fact. And then the neocons, the Israel lobbies all over the internet attacking anybody that points this out and tries to say it's not the case. Well, Netanyahu brags about it. So, I mean, that's the big news. I'm not even defending Trump. It actually makes him worse that it is now literally true what I claimed, what I wanted to claim wasn't true because I don't want to believe it, that Trump is an errand boy of Israel. And how do we deal with that, Nick Fuentes?

1:38:44 Well, if Trump is an errand boy for Israel, then you gotta shut down his government. And that means you gotta go into the midterms and you gotta get the Democrats in. And the Democrats hopefully will impede the administration. That's what they're gonna do. They're gonna launch investigations, subpoenas, select committee, all that kind of stuff. They're gonna grind it to a halt. And if Trump is an operative of a foreign government, consider that he's forfeited his entire mandate. Because his whole basis of support is that he's America first, MAGA, he's not like the other politicians. Okay, well, if you're an errand boy for Israel, if you're a puppet of the Jewish state and you're bringing us to war, for them, that's not a small thing. That's not a little bit of foreign aid. We're going to war on their behalf. He has to be opposed.

1:39:29 And a lot of people don't want to take it there for one reason or another. But I don't know what the option is. I don't know how you work with that. If you're America first and Trump is Israel first, well, that's not exactly a divide that can be bridged. There's not actually a middle ground between like- No, I totally agree. Let me give you the good news. From my sources, there are many, Pentagon, White House, you name it. This is a firestorm. Trump is really pissed off. He doesn't even know what he thinks. That's why all these messages, notice the last few hours, the messages are all schizophrenic. Have you noticed that? Yeah, yeah, all over the media. So that's good news at least. I think we've got to, what would you, I'm telling you, Trump will end up probably seeing this.

CHAPTER 27 / 28 Discussion

The Humanitarian Risks of a Failed Iranian State

Destroying the Iranian government without a viable alternative is described as a potential war crime that would lead to a humanitarian crisis similar to Syria or Libya. Nick Fuentes references the Jewish holiday of Purim and the biblical concept of the "Amalekites" to explain the mindset of those seeking the total destruction of Iran. He warns that without the IRGC to maintain order, Iran will become a failed state of 90 million people.

iran· irgc· syria· libya· purim· amalekites· war crimes

1:40:12 because they respect you. I've met with them and stuff. I told you off record, like they're, they've said the algorithms, they're, they're, they're paying attention to you, son. And I mean that in a nice way. What, what, what would you advise the president to do right now? Well, it's tricky because we're in, so, you know, you would have said never go in, but we're in now. Now that we're in, I think you gotta hit Iran really hard and then try your best to leave. But, you know, again, it's like I said before, Israel is gonna want us to push deeper and deeper into this until we have a full scale regime change. And then if we win, put assholes in to do it again. Right, right.

1:40:52 So you gotta back off, you gotta let the Iranian regime reconstitute itself and restore order. Because if, look, if the Iranian security architecture is not gonna rule the country, then who is? There's nobody else. So it's either a failed state- And that's what Al Price said two weeks ago, same thing. Everyone has. I mean, it's just obvious. This country has 90 million people in it. Their economy is already collapsing. If you don't have the IRGC running the country, it's just going to be a failed state, unless you have an alternative, which they don't. So that's who's going to prevail. And so you need to just- So it's a war crime to go wreck this state if you don't have an alternative?

1:41:28 I think so, yeah, I think so. This is shaping up to look like Syria or like Libya. One of these places where it's like the worst humanitarian crisis in the world because who's then going to provide all the services and the goods and who's going to provide for the logistics and infrastructure security? Well, I've seen Israelis on a bunch of interviews say we don't care about the Iranians, screw them, wreck it. We can't be part of something like that. Well, and this is the Jewish holiday of Purim. I believe it was yesterday, Purim, which commemorates the victory of the Jews over the Iranians and they celebrate their victory by killing 75,000 Iranians just on account of, you know, they already won. They already got through Cai and they just killed a bunch of them anyway. So they view them as the Amalekites.

1:42:11 and the Amalekites kill the women, kill the children, kill everybody. That's who we're dealing with here. And people say it's the Khazar mafia. People say it's the Masons. This is out of the Old Testament. This is out of the Talmud. It's Jews. It's Israel. And that's what they have in store for the Iranians. Just like in Gaza, they love to see it. So I had like 50 clips and I should have played this with you, but Nick things are quick and he got to come back sooner. I'll come on your show if you want. You gotta come down to Austin. You're dead on. You've been totally dedicated. My respect level one of you and our here is the former Israeli prime minister. Total Rothschild operatives.

CHAPTER 28 / 28 Discussion

Turkish Threats and the Expansion of the Levant

Former Israeli officials warn that Turkey is becoming the "new Iran" under President Erdogan, seeking to encircle Israel. There is a discussion regarding the biblical "deed" to land from the Nile to the Euphrates mentioned in Genesis 15, which some interpret as a justification for Israeli expansion. This expansionist rhetoric is reportedly driving Saudi Arabia and Pakistan into a mutual defense pact against Israeli interests.

turkey· erdogan· qatar· genesis 15· abrahamic accords· saudi arabia· pakistan

1:42:48 I mean, this is bullshit. Play that and then go to the club of, um, We already talked about your show, I saw you. But how come you're going, yeah, Israel can take it all? I mean, and half the countries are allies of Israel. This is like, yeah, I love my neighbor, he's my friend, I'm gonna eat him next week. Here's the clips. A new Turkish threat is emerging. I want to be very clear. Turkey and Qatar have gained influence in Syria, are seeking influence elsewhere and everywhere throughout the region. And from here, I warn,

1:43:36 Turkey is the new Iran. Erdogan is sophisticated, dangerous, and he seeks to encircle Israel. And while some senior Israelis were on Qatar's payroll, Qatar and Turkey are nourishing the Islamic Brotherhood monster that is growing and eventually might become as dangerous as the one created by Iran. Turkey and Qatar gaining influence not only in Syria, but also in Gaza Through the front door if Israel just stopped now everyone and trying to create a new one successful They're gonna stop Turkey is trying to flip Saudi Arabia against us and establish a hostile Sunni access with nuclear Pakistan you've appealed to Genesis Genesis 15 says it's Abram. It's pre Abraham's Abram and

1:44:37 receives from God the news that his descendants will inherit the land, and you tell me as the theologian if I'm getting this wrong, but from the Euphrates to the Nile. I think that's right. And that would include like basically the entire Middle East. That would be the Levant, so that would be Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon. It would also be big parts of Saudi Arabia and Iraq. It would be, I mean. Not sure it would go that far. I mean, it would be a big piece of land, but here's the point. It would be a lot of places that are now countries. I love that I erupt, same here. We'll just take most of it. This particular area that we're talking about now. Fuck this. Israel is a

1:45:18 is a land that God gave through Abraham to a people that he chose. It was a people, a place, and a purpose. We can look at it that way. Christian Zionism, I wanna go back, because that's where we started on this. I'm not gonna let you off on this, because you have said it three times that God gave this land to this people, and so it is entirely fair for me, with respect, to ask what land are you talking about? Because I just read Genesis 15, as I have many times, and that land, I think it says, from the Nile to the Euphrates, which is, once again, basically the entire Middle East, so God gave that land

1:45:54 to his people, the Jews, or he didn't. You're saying he did. What does that mean? Does Israel have the right to that land? Because you're appealing to Genesis. You're saying that's the original deed. It would be fine if they took it all. Play that again. Back it up 10 seconds. So they were... Here's the deal. I can do the math. I can talk for 10 hours on this. They attacked Saudi Arabia, Jordan, all these places. I mean, we already had Obama put Muslim radicals in to take over Egypt. I mean, this is cuckoo town. Play it again. He's like, yeah, they can take it all. They will take it all this year. And we're supposed to be the muscle for this. Folks, here it is. As you're appealing to Genesis, you're saying that's the original deed. It would be fine if they took it all.

1:46:53 But you want us to do it, Nick Fuentes. That's exactly right. And it doesn't stop in. Everybody thought it would stop in Iran. And now they say, well, we're going to take out Erdogan and so on. And it just goes to show that's their end game is they want to control the entire region. They want no rivals. And that's why they took out Iraq, Syria, Iran. And now what's actually funny in their quest to destroy Iran, they've actually rallied everybody against them. So Saudi Arabia was getting ready to join the Abraham Accords in 2023 when October 7th happened and then that derailed the process. Now the Saudis are working with Pakistan on a mutual defense pact. They're bringing Turkey into it. There is actually an emerging axis that is literally being built. And notice Israel blames Iran when Saudi Arabia is clear it's what Israel did.

1:47:44 Right, right. Yeah, of course. It's always Iran. It's always, you know, then it'll be Erdogan in Syria. And it's funny because they took out Syria. Now they're worried that Erdogan is going to fill the power vacuum that they created. So they worked with him to take down Assad. Right, right. Exactly. So we got 45 seconds left. Are you going to do a show tonight? I'll be doing a show tonight. Yes. When do I get to go on your show? I want to come on. Soon soon, so we don't have I don't have a big studio like yours. I have a small studio Yeah, I know I just like to hear myself talk more I guess it's easy Hey listen, you're dead on I want to try to figure this out Nick Foyntes on rumble Nick J Foyntes Thank you so much I hope you're wrong that Trump's unsalvageable, but we're about to find out Thank you so much for being was powerful our 45 minutes. Thank you for having me