Topic: Verdict

New filings reveal allegations of Smartmatic bribery in the Philippines and Serbia, yet legal actions have primarily targeted figures like Rudy Giuliani and Mike Lindell. Lindell recently faced a $1.5 billion default judgment, similar to the "directed verdict" used against Alex Jones in the Sandy Hook case. The segment argues that judges are using discovery disputes to bypass jury trials and protect election software companies.

Jack Posobiec asserts that the U.S. Republic died long ago, tracing the decline back to the creation of the Federal Reserve and the New Deal. However, he notes that the recent Trump verdict has backfired, citing the pro-Trump reaction of the UFC crowd and $200 million in donations as evidence that "Normie World" is finally waking up to the establishment's tactics.

Mario Nafal and Nick Sortor join the program to discuss the impact of the Trump conviction on public trust in the American legal system. Nafal, known for his large audience on X Spaces, expresses concern that a pillar of democracy was shattered by the verdict. Sortor notes the emotional weight of the day and argues that the trial venue in New York City was chosen specifically to ensure a conviction.

Truckers are organizing a boycott against New York City in response to a recent fraud verdict against Donald Trump. The movement is characterized as a display of solidarity among independent operators and mid-sized trucking companies. The protest aims to demonstrate the economic power of the logistics industry against perceived judicial overreach.

Billionaire investor Kevin O'Leary argues on CNN that the $355 million judgment against Donald Trump makes New York a "loser state" for investors. O'Leary explains that the "victimless crime" verdict undermines standard real estate development practices involving bank negotiations and property valuations. He states he will now prioritize investments in Oklahoma, North Dakota, and West Virginia over New York.

The discussion draws parallels between the legal proceedings against Donald Trump and the previous trials involving Alex Jones in Texas and Connecticut. Both cases involved default verdicts based on purported non-compliance with discovery, which the speakers claim were used to trick the public into thinking a legitimate trial on the merits had occurred. They argue the "veil is lifting" as more people recognize these as politically motivated show trials.

Shroyer and Pattis discuss the unusual method of calculating damages in the Texas trial, where the judge allegedly added up individual numbers from different jurors. Shroyer claims this process is unheard of in legal practice and suggests it as a ground for appeal. They also briefly touch upon plaintiff lawyer Chris Mattei's public comments urging people not to shop at Infowars.

Attorney Robert Barnes joins the program to analyze the record-breaking defamation verdict against Alex Jones. Barnes characterizes the legal proceedings as a "joke" and an attempt to silence a prominent dissident voice rather than a pursuit of justice for the plaintiffs. He argues that the audience's continued support through product purchases is the only way to maintain the network's survival during the appeals process.

Alex Jones reacts in real-time as the verdict in his Connecticut defamation trial is about to be read. He characterizes the proceedings as a "political jihad" and a "show trial" where he was not allowed to present evidence or a proper defense. Jones mocks the plaintiffs' lawyers, including the son of Senator Richard Blumenthal, and asserts that the legal system is being weaponized to bankrupt him for questioning official narratives.

The judge sends the jury back to the deliberation room to add decimal points to the damages figures, which Jones interprets as a sign of an astronomical, "billion-dollar" verdict. He laughs at the situation, calling it a "joke" and a "travesty" while the world stands on the verge of nuclear war. Jones vows to continue questioning events like the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage and the Uvalde shooting regardless of the legal outcome.

A courtroom clip features a plaintiff's attorney asking a jury to take away Alex Jones's platform to prevent him from "peddling lies." The attorney argues that deterrence is necessary to ensure Jones cannot rebuild his media presence following the verdict. Jones responds by characterizing the lawyers as "ambulance chasers" and Democratic Party operatives intent on silencing his questioning of public events.

Robert Barnes delivers a simulated opening statement for the Alex Jones defense, focusing on the failure of local politicians to secure Sandy Hook Elementary. He argues that the blame should lie with those who failed to provide locking doors and effective safety mechanisms, rather than a broadcaster asking questions. The mock statement concludes by asking for a "zero verdict" to affirm the right of Americans to demand answers from their government.

The jury in Kenosha, Wisconsin, returns a unanimous verdict of not guilty on all counts for Kyle Rittenhouse. The charges included the intentional homicide of Anthony Huber and the reckless homicide of Joseph Rosenbaum during the 2020 civil unrest. Rittenhouse is formally acquitted of all charges, including the shooting of Gaige Grosskreutz and two counts of reckless endangerment.

The court in Kenosha reads the unanimous verdict for Kyle Rittenhouse, finding him not guilty on all five counts, including first-degree intentional homicide. Rittenhouse collapses in emotion as the verdicts are read. Judge Schroeder thanks the jury for their service and notes that they are under no obligation to discuss the case with anyone.

Pappert analyzes the televised reactions of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to the Derek Chauvin verdict. He characterizes Biden's speech as a "hostage situation" and accuses him of plagiarizing Chinese propaganda regarding American systemic racism. He notes that Harris continues to push for the "George Floyd Justice in Policing Act."

Jones discusses the "Marxist" agenda to destroy the nuclear family and promote racial division in America. He takes phone calls from listeners regarding their predictions for the Derek Chauvin verdict, with many anticipating a hung jury or a conviction driven by fear of riots. Jones reiterates that the globalists are using the trial as a diversion to loot the country and implement a new world order.

Robert Barnes analyzes the Chauvin jury, predicting a 50% chance of acquittal based on the prosecution's "overreach" and the presence of analytical thinkers on the panel. He suggests that African American male jurors may be the ones most likely to fight for an acquittal, contrary to the media narrative. Barnes notes that betting markets saw a spike in acquittal odds following the defense's closing arguments.