Monday, 25 July 2022

MONDAY FULL SHOW 7/25/22 – Alex Jones In Court Fighting For The Future of Free Speech in America as Globalists Unleash Next Phase of The Great Reset

A high-stakes legal battle in Austin serves as the front line against a globalist agenda seeking to criminalize dissent and dismantle American due process.

By The Alex Jones Show | 3h listen | 41 chapters
MONDAY FULL SHOW 7/25/22 – Alex Jones In Court Fighting For The Future of Free Speech in America as Globalists Unleash Next Phase of The Great Reset cover

About this episode

Alex Jones enters a Travis County courtroom in Austin, Texas, to contest a defamation trial that legal analyst Robert Barnes characterizes as a Soviet-style show trial designed to dismantle the First Amendment. With InfoWars facing a default judgment that prevents a substantive defense on the merits, the proceedings represent a critical test case for the weaponization of the legal system against dissident media voices. The defense argues that the erosion of due process in this case establishes a dangerous template for the systematic de-platforming of political opposition across the United States.

Attorney Robert Barnes details how the court has prohibited the mention of free speech while the prosecution relies on a theory of group libel not recognized by the U.S. Constitution. Beyond the courtroom, Senator Rand Paul warns of a rising two-tiered justice system where left-wing violence in cities like New York goes unpunished while figures like Steve Bannon face selective prosecution for contempt of Congress. Meanwhile, journalist Savannah Hernandez reports from the southern border on the exploitation of the migration pipeline by cartels and the subsequent demographic shifts and urban decay currently transforming American cities.

Gerald Celente joins the broadcast to declare that World War III has effectively begun through the funneling of billions in Raytheon-produced weaponry to Ukraine. Celente contrasts the Biden administration's commitment to foreign entanglements with the domestic collapse of infrastructure and public trust in legacy media institutions. The program concludes with a call to action regarding the 2000 Mules documentary and the necessity of independent media in an era of globalist-driven censorship.


CHAPTER 01 / 41 Discussion

Alex Jones and the Erosion of Due Process

The legal standard of being innocent until proven guilty is being discarded in favor of a new strategy where individuals are declared guilty in the court of public opinion. Alex Jones, Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, and Roger Stone are cited as primary targets of this shift in the American justice system. This trend is described as a foundational threat to national liberty and a form of psychological lobotomization of the public.

alex jones· due process· court of public opinion· innocent until proven guilty· propaganda

00:00 So here's the new Democrat strategy, declare somebody guilty in the court of public opinion just in general. Not even on the basics of a certain issue or topic just in general this person is guilty in the court of public opinion they're bad they're guilty and they run all their propaganda and they run all their hit pieces You can say Alex Jones is an example, you could say Donald Trump is an example. You could say Steve Bannon Roger Stone. You can show the examples so they just declare you guilty your bad in the court of public opinion then when they get you in a courtroom they just say oh you're guilt and that's new process so innocent until proven guilty a cornerstone

00:50 our legal system a cornerstone of justice in this country innocent till proven guilty is being thrown out the window now and We all know why so whether you love Alex Jones or you hate Alex Jones if you don't understand The implications of saying innocent till proven guilty no longer applies here Innocent till proven guilty we're gonna take that corner stone out of our Justice and Legal System Foundation. If you don't understand how that hurts you, if you don't understand how that goes beyond Alex Jones whether you love him or hate him then then you have been blinded You have been lobotomized And you have been propagandised into celebrating your own demise

01:47 Rallying patriots worldwide in defense of human liberty. It's Alex Jones Ladies and gentlemen there have been a lot of important broadcasts in InfoWars history I myself Have had a lot of very important broadcasts In my eight years here at info wars, but perhaps

CHAPTER 02 / 41 Discussion

Owen Shroyer Filling in for Alex Jones During Trial

Owen Shroyer hosts the broadcast as Alex Jones begins a multi-week court appearance in Austin, Texas, to fight for the survival of InfoWars. Shroyer characterizes the legal proceedings as a battle for the First Amendment and the right of the American people to hear dissenting voices. He warns that activist judges may use the case to establish a precedent for destroying media outlets they dislike.

owen shroyer· alex jones· infowars· free speech· travis county court

02:26 on this Monday, July 25th 2022 at least for the issue of free speech or on the issue of does Alex Jones even get to exist and have a platform and have a voice and be on the air. As far as those issues are concerned this might be the biggest transmission in InfoWars history Now Owen Schroer sitting in for Alex today it's an honor and I will be sitting in for Alex for the foreseeable future because Alex Jones is in court this week, and next week, and who knows how long fighting for free speech for America and fighting for InfoWars to continue to go on. Let me lay out the basics here for you and we'll get into the gruesome details coming up the rest of the way in the first hour

03:31 with legal expertise coverage of what's about to go down, then in the second hour we'll have the legal experts in studio with me as well. But Alex Jones is going to be in court... In fact I'm gonna be in court some of these days as well And so imagine how many other news outlets have to deal with that. None really, in fact there's really two other people I would say in media that deal with the political persecution anywhere close to the level of us here and that's obviously Steve Bannon and Roger Stone and what they've had to go through but so Alex Jones now in court all week fighting for his right to free speech and for America's right to free speech and a lot of people may say hey That's not fair to say...that's not accurate to say

04:27 Alex Jones is in court for things that he said and he does. That has nothing to do with the free speech issue in America Well, you'd be horribly mistaken if you fell for that lie You'd be horribly mistaken Now again we're gonna go to the legal experts on this so you don't have to hear my opinion as somebody that's involved or As a talk show host here with interest in the matter. Yo-you'll hear what the legal experts Have to say coming up But let me just ask you a question. Let's put it in the context of a question, if you had a radical liberal that was a judge and that judge got an Alex Jones case in front of them do you think they would be responding to the case from a perspective

05:27 I need to put away any biases that i have and I need to make sure that justice is done here and that we have a true fair proceeding here or do you think that liberal might say, I've got Alex Jones in front of me. I've got one shot to destroy him. I've got one shot to destroy InfoWars. I'm gonna take it." Now let's just say that's a hypothetical question how do you think that would go? And then depending on how that would go or how that potentially does go You don't think that has implications for the rest of America? You don't think that has implications for the rest of the media if an activist judge can just decide they don't like you and they're going to destroy you, and then that becomes precedent. If you don't see how that's dangerous for the future of this country, and if you don't see how that's dangerous for the future free speech, Then you're blind So when we come back We're gonna be hearing

06:34 legal experts take first response to what's about to go down in court. But folks understand this, there is a reason why Alex Jones has been saying more than ever this could be our last transmission so I'll expand on that a little further before we go to the lawyers here on The Alex Jones Show when we return from this short break Ladies and gentlemen, I will be filling in for Alex for the foreseeable future We're really not sure it depends on how these court things go Alex is in court today for the foreseeable future as well. I'm also gonna have to be in court, so even my exposure is gonna be limited in the upcoming weeks as well but to pick it up where I left off in the first opening segment here a lot of people have been commenting and you may have noticed more than ever Alex comes on air and says this could be our last broadcast And while we did have financial problems and we were having problems funding ourselves

CHAPTER 03 / 41 Discussion

InfoWars Financial Status and Political Persecution Claims

InfoWars secured enough funding through the summer of 2022 via product sales and donor contributions, temporarily alleviating immediate financial concerns. The network claims it is targeted not for criminal activity, but for opposing globalist plans for world domination and depopulation. Owen Shroyer denies having personal wealth, asserting that legal opponents falsely assume he has millions of dollars based on his audience size.

infowars· funding· political persecution· globalists· depopulation

07:39 ourselves here, the crew and everybody. We were able to assure that we could be funded through the summer with some of the sales we had getting some products back in stock and having the money bomb and some generous donors that all went down earlier this year in the beginning of spring And we basically said this is a big success. The audience has done it again, we've now got funding through the summer. So we took care of some of the financial stuff as far as that being a major issue at least through the summer. We said hey, we've got the funding now and can stay on air until the summer and thats when were going to have our next big challenge which is the legal challenge Now were gonna hear from legal experts in this hour

08:29 some of the gruesome details of what is about to happen in this court case going on all week and next week, and for the foreseeable future. Then we're gonna have Robert Barnes in studio with follow-up coverage and some of the latest breaking stuff as it begins but there's a couple things that are key to understanding one is there is no other media outlet that goes through what we go through And that's not because we're criminals, that's not because we're bad people. That's not because we've done anything wrong it's because we are really going head to head toe-to-toe intellectually philosophically politically against the criminals that run this planet and have plans for world domination and depopulation. They know where one of the biggest threats standing in their way just as a populist voice as a voice of reason and truth and hope and patriotism and everything else so that's why Infowars

09:31 or Alex Jones better yet, must be made an example of. Must be destroyed Now here's an example We've got a fantastic crew here we've got an unbelievable multimedia operation here but crew probably hasn't been given a raise in a long time and they try to get judgments against me And they say we're gonna get millions of dollars out of Owen Schroer we're going to get millions of dollars Folks I don't have millions of dollars To be quite honest with you, I don't even have close to a million dollars. But see they see what we do here They see our audience size and then they just do a compare They compared other people in media to see what they're making and they say there's no way Owen Schroer doesn't have a million dollars With his audience and what he's done He has a million dollars We're gonna find it we're gonna get it They do the research they have all my records they've everything There's no million dollars

10:31 We're not in it for money, folks. We're not in it for fame. We're not in it for fortune. Never has been that way never will be that way Would I like millions of dollars? Would I like beachfront properties all around the world like all these great liberals? Of course I would! But I'd rather live in a free country with the opportunity for prosperity than to have all that momentarily So just understand, there's a reason why Infowars is target number one. There's a reason why Alex Jones is in court today, in my opinion fighting for not only his right to free speech but for the rights of free speech for all Americans now here's a basic recap and introduction from the Barnes Free Prod podcast that we're going to be going through for the rest of the hour because forget about my opinion let's go to the legal experts who are covering this case so here is the Barnes & Free podcast just an introduction

CHAPTER 04 / 41 Discussion

Robert Barnes on Sandy Hook Defamation Trial Merits

Attorney Robert Barnes analyzes the defamation suit brought by Sandy Hook parents against Alex Jones in Travis County, Texas. Barnes argues that the Texas Court of Appeals established a dangerous precedent by allowing a suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress without specific speech targeted at individuals. He claims that 99% of InfoWars coverage acknowledged the tragedy occurred, while the lawsuit focuses on less than 30 minutes of scattered broadcast time.

robert barnes· sandy hook· defamation· travis county· texas court of appeals

11:28 of what is coming up here, what Alex Jones, what InfoWars, what America is up against in the coming weeks and these important times. These perilous times for free speech for InfoWars and for America? Well we'll get to everything but let's start with the Alex Jones trial coming up I mean it- We're gonna go over some stuff that we've already talked about in the past How is it that Jones has been declared guilty on the merits by default Yeah, it's extraordinary. So what I mean the suit that is going to trial this week in Austin Texas and Travis County is by two plaintiffs who were the parents of a child who died at Sandy Hook they sued Alex Jones on theories of defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress

12:19 Even though Alex Jones, as I recall never mentioned them by name ever or said factually specific things about them by name ever. So it was a unique case in that regard but the Texas Austin Court of Appeals basically established a perilous new precedent for speech and media in America which was that if you say something that the government doesn't agree with and somebody is upset or offended by what you said, and they have some connection at any level to the event. Then you can be sued for intentional infliction of emotional distress without actually targeting any speech at them individually."

13:03 So that was the first extraordinary development in his case, and this case is going to trial. The second one is the media mythology about the case and often the plaintiff's lawyers repeatedly lie about the nature of the evidence in the case. is the mythology is that Alex Jones instigated and initiated and originated the hypothesis that Sandy Hook did not happen at all. That is completely an utterly false, 99% of what InfoWars printed published or broadcast concerning Sandy Hook acknowledged in admitted that the event occurred, that the children died, that it took place who the shooter was

13:46 The questions that Infowars primarily and Alex Jones primarily raised concern the culpability of big pharma, whether SSRI drugs were the appropriate medication. The question about the psychiatric treatment of young men in America, the celebratization of gun violence by gaming in Hollywood culture and the potential culpability and complicity in local police response times, and local politicians in the school safety arena providing adequate safety mechanisms for the children. He said that they were going to wrongfully blame the gun and the law-abiding rights and Second Amendment rights of ordinary Americans as the culprit for these traumatic and tragic deaths."

14:31 Midway through, several years after Sandy Hook some callers would call in and they raised questions about whether the deaths happened at all. And Jones responded in a way that could be interpreted as agreeing with their comments. That is the primary basis of the suit about of the 7 million plus words broadcast by Alex Jones They've taken about less than 30 minutes of words scattered out over a seven-year time frame and are saying that is the entire basis of their emotional trauma.

CHAPTER 06 / 41 Discussion

Discovery Disputes and the Big Lie Theory

The prosecution's case is described as being built on the "big lie" that Alex Jones became wealthy specifically by lying about the Sandy Hook shooting. Robert Barnes asserts that financial and documentary evidence actually disproves this theory, which is why the court moved toward a default judgment to avoid the evidence being seen. He notes that Jones sat for eight days of depositions and turned over extensive records, including spam emails.

discovery· depositions· financial evidence· plaintiff lawyers· legal theory

19:09 That's the judge presiding over the Alex Jones case. This case is a case where the American judicial system is really on trial, and unfortunately, the verdict looks like it will be a damnation of that system even though the goal is to issue such a crazy verdict that they are able to completely take Alex Jones off the air. Robert, so this is the question... I have so many actually because intentional infliction of emotional distress Conceptually, I can understand. They're already going through trauma because – and I want everyone to understand this – it's a horrible, horrible incident. It's beyond – it's horror of the purest form. Nothing about a defense of Alex Jones is intended to be construed as denying it happened, denying the trauma of everyone who survived that and the parents who lost kids. None of that! This is a grotesque incident

20:08 where the grotesqueness of the incident is not going to be somehow attenuated by railroading some podcaster, radio host who might have said some things which could have been a little over the top from time-to-time or even overtly over the top. The idea here is that you have Alex Jones is known for pushing the envelope of questioning narratives floating hypotheses which are tenable sometimes untenable other times. The emotional distress might have been aggravated. If someone comes out and says, you're lying, you never even had a kid that can cause emotional distress and if they do it at loud enough bullhorn they can cause emotional stress I understand that nonetheless the idea to deny Alex the ability to defend And this was purportedly on the basis for having defaulted or violated his obligations of disclosure under depositions

21:04 Yeah, I mean what's amazing is Alex Jones has produced more documents and sat for more hours of more testimony as have other people in the case on behalf of InfoWars than any media defendant I've ever heard of. And yet even though he's turned over his text, he's turned over his emails, turned over stuff that was sent to a junk email box, turned over all kinds of documents and information They said that he didn't turn over enough and they called him default. Now here's the real secret behind this, and why I predicted that this was a risk from day one during it. And for those out there, I am not currently representing Alex Jones so I am free to speak my mind

21:48 They're already, apparently I've heard that the plaintiff's lawyers are complaining about me speaking out about the case. That's how corrupt these plaintiffs' lawyers are. They're political hacks standing on the bodies of dead kids to line their pockets and take away other people's political rights and i find it disgusting what they've done And so, but in this particular context Jones has produced more discovery than anybody. I can't find anyone that's produced more discovery than he is and yet they pretended that he did why? because they built their whole case on a big lie. Alex Jones didn't initiate and instigate any of this, number one. And number two, their big lie was that Alex Jones became famous and made his money because he lied about this totally and utterly false. So what do you do when you know the evidence is going to disprove your theory? The financial evidence and documentary evidence in email evidence will you pretend it existed but Alex Jones must have secretly destroyed it

22:46 That's why they had to go this path. Their whole case was built on a lie, the judges knew it and the judges in order to cover up that lie needed to facilitate it and promote it by pretending he destroyed documents he never did He was in fact deposed and he was deposed time and time again. Exactly, many times I think he sat for like eight days or something And that doesn't include everybody else who sat for day after day after day of deposition They turned over emails they shouldn't have even had to turn over They were sent emails in their spam email where someone was trying

23:26 of the media. That's how much he turned over. And like when you dig down and try to get to what exactly it was, he didn't turn over? It ends up being very weak. By the way that is not the default standards in America I have never seen a default judgment issued in America on these grounds ever! There is supposed to be specific to this specific fact that wasn't turned over that issue can

24:04 if they weren't able to independently acquire the evidence, that fact can be admitted against them. That's not what this judge has done. This judge has not allowed him to defend himself on the substantive merits based on a made up theory of the plaintiff's lawyers that the judges knew was false had reason to know was false and in order to cover it up and punish and prosecute Alex Jones They need to do this. And by the way, everybody people might say why should I care? Alex Jones admits he made mistakes about his Sandy Hook reporting maybe these people out there don't like Alex Jones because folks the same reason we talked about it in 2018 when they banned him from all the social media We said this is a template. Alex Jones is the example and they're coming for you next

CHAPTER 07 / 41 Discussion

Alex Jones as a Test Case for Global Censorship

The legal and digital de-platforming of Alex Jones is framed as a template for broader censorship that eventually reached Donald Trump and members of Congress. The current trial is presented as the next phase of this test, moving from internet censorship to the stripping of basic legal rights in a courtroom. Comparisons are drawn between the treatment of Jones and the trial of Steve Bannon.

censorship· test case· social media· steve bannon· judicial system

24:45 And the legal theory they got approved in this case is that if you say anything that the government doesn't agree with, that somebody else feels emotionally offended by. They can now sue you into bankruptcy and if Alex Jones has any example, you won't even get to defend yourself on their merits in front of a trial by jury. It's very important folks remember Alex Jones was a test case for censorship. They censored the president after that this is another test case. You know the media likes to attack Alex Jones and they show you a portrait of Alex with his head on fire. Like, oh wow! You know he must be crazy because he's passionate and rambunctious about the issues in the topics he covers like for example when Alex Jones is covering free speech issues in the digital marketplace

25:36 Yeah, Alex's head is on fire. Or at least you might think listening because he understood before most others the implications of censorship on the internet He understood that if it was going to be Alex Jones that was the test case That it would only be the beginning and so he was up here as a firebrand saying If they censor me they censor you next And then they censored him There was barely any backlash. In fact, even most Republicans supported it including on Fox News who have an issue with censorship now Unironically but you see we understood Alex was the test case then For censorship on the Internet now you see where were at four years later Even the president of the United States gets censored Congress members get censored everybody getting censored This case that Alex is going through now is the next test

26:33 test case. So just like we were all Alex Jones dealing with internet censorship, now we're all Alex Jones dealing with free speech rights and really just basic legal principles and justice in a courtroom so everybody should be concerned about this case more from the legal experts on why Because people have to appreciate that he's been foreclosed from pleading on the basis of default for failure to produce documents, whatever. He had been deposed multiple times and again everybody this is not to defend Alex Jones this is to defend the process that needs to be respected in order for there to be justice and not

27:12 literally judgments in the absence of defense because that's not a system anymore. That's just an execution and Alex Jones admitted that he said things that were wrong I brought up one chat which is actually, I think quite on point winning reality says Alex was set up yet The disinformation was calculated organized The calls were mostly strategy They pulled him in the direction they wanted him to go Alex got so big He disconnected from his space Maybe not that But the idea that we know how agitators can work, how agent provocateur can work. Knowing what they wanted to do get someone to call in and get them to run with it you'd get the soundbite and you get Alex Jones saying something like crisis actors which would imply that there were actually their kids were not actually killed or that they're acting

27:57 And that's distressing. I can appreciate that that's distressing. What would be the defenses? I'd like to hear on the merits, what would be the quantum of the damages it has to be realistically correlated to what's going on is the distressing part that some somebody you're gonna call a kook or a wacko says your crisis actors and not the fact that your actual child was killed in this incident put a quantum on it. But there has to be a process that has to be respected and if it's not respected you no longer have a judicial system, you just have show trials like we saw with Steve Bannon Exactly, well that might be a good bridge into Bannon. So the trial will happen this week, Viva's here to cover it I may be in and out of the courtroom depending on circumstances again i'm not official counsel-of-record for the Connecticut lawyers and others that may be listening out there but I'm not going to be silenced just because they would like me to be now who knows these judges are capable of crazy things if they try crazy things I will seek my relief and remedy accordingly

CHAPTER 08 / 41 Discussion

School Safety Lapses and Political Weaponization of Tragedies

Questions are raised regarding whether the rush to destroy the Sandy Hook school building was intended to hide lapses in safety protocols, such as the inability to lock classroom doors from the inside. The Obama administration is accused of politically weaponizing the tragedy to pursue a gun control agenda while ignoring issues like big pharma and mental health. A contrast is made with a recent incident in Indiana where an armed citizen stopped a mass shooter.

uvalde· school safety· gun control· obama administration· second amendment

28:59 But it's a sign of where we're at. And more people should be more concerned with this case, regardless of what they think about Sadie Hook, regardless of what they think about Alex Jones because this is about the American judicial system looking like an embarrassment just like the January 6th cases and as a good bridge just like the disgrace of a case that was the Steve Bannon trial. Just one thing before we get there Robert The idea that a lot of people had never heard of Alex Jones until Sandy Hook, A lot of people in the mainstream didn't. And I remember...I only knew vaguely of Alex Jones because Howard Stern made fun of him from time to time So at the time of Sandy Hook, I do remember what Alex Jones was saying Talking about a hoax They were walking around the school as if it was a drill Floating the idea Entertaining a caller talking about crisis actors People are saying

29:53 there were lies about Sandy Hook. I'll go with the plausible scenario now that we've lived through a Uvalde, that maybe the reason why they rushed to destroy the school was to hide the fact it didn't have basic safety protocol? I can appreciate that argument which some people might call conspiracy theory and others might just call liability theory but most people didn't know about Alex Jones in the mainstream until this it put him in the crosshairs and they're making an example of him. And the question is, Robert, what do you think is reasonable that can be expected by way of any condemnation for The Quantum? Well I see this as a threefold question because one is the statute of limitations should have barred these claims Texas law requires me to make a correction or retraction request before suit that didn't happen here so procedurally this case never should have been brought period It should've been dismissed right out of the gate

30:44 Secondly, the constitutional requirement of colloquium means that you have to make a specific factual statement about a specifically identified individual. Now sometimes you can identify that individual by image or by association rather than by name but here there are too many people involved for someone to be- for them to know that it was about that person Third, it has to be credible. So historically, your friends or others have to believe it's true about you or doesn't function as defamation. It doesn't impact your character here there is no evidence that happened at all. There's no evidence that anybody in their community really believed that they were not real

31:23 And in fact, the very nature of saying someone's not real is not necessarily attacking that person because you're saying they're not real in the first place. You're saying that somebody else up there so this does not fit the definition of defamation procedurally and never should have been allowed under the law and constitutionally it didn't meet the standard under the First Amendment right to protection of freedom of speech at the press but I agree The real story here was the reason why so many people were suspicious about what happened was in part because the Obama administration chose to politically weaponize it and politicized it. They said that people connected to them literally said they're going to stand on the graves of these dead kids, to get gun control in America, to strip people their Second Amendment rights. That led to a lot of people being suspect because of the history of government false flags when they try to take away peoples' rights

32:13 And the other aspect was the very peculiar behavior of the politicians in Connecticut, who were hiding information from their sunshine laws. It turned out what they were hiding was pertinent to Uvoldi! In that, because if the truth had come out the politicians would have been properly judged and school safety would have dramatically improved in America but gun control would've failed as an agenda. So they were willing to sacrifice more kids' lives to get gun control in America because what was it they didn't do? They didn't have a basic mechanism to lock the doors from the inside and because they couldn't

32:54 I mean, they found the kids stacked up in bathrooms. These kids would not have been dead had they had basic safety mechanisms in place and they got away with it because the courts let them get away with it. They got away with it because the Obama administration let him get away with it. They got away with it because the media let them get away with it. And part of this whole case is to blame Alex Jones for Sandy Hook when it was the school politicians who led to Sandy Hook happening at the scale it did and probably had something to do with Uvalde. They didn't want people raising questions about school safety, but don't ask any questions about whether the politicians stuffed cash in their pockets rather than spending on kids' safety. They didn't wanna ask questions about police response times

33:42 They didn't want questions about big pharma. They didn't want questions about the kid who committed the shooting, about his poor mental health treatment. They didn't want questions about being able to have guns like the person in Indiana constitutional carry and he had Kyle Rittenhouse level accuracy and that's why a lot of lives are alive today in Indiana because he exercised that constitutional right to carry and took that guy out with some of the best shooting Anybody seen, since Kyle Rittenhouse. 15 seconds 40 to 50 meters away with a handheld pistol and the CNN ran the headline unarmed pedestrian and not a damn hero but okay. Exactly so that I mean that's why we're at or this is a scary show trial in America it makes the Chicago 7 trial look like an icon of judicial ethics

CHAPTER 09 / 41 Discussion

Victim Identification and the Demand for Reparations

A discussion emerges regarding the "victim identification" culture, where individuals claim moral superiority and financial compensation based on trauma. Some plaintiffs in the Sandy Hook litigation are characterized as fraudulent or politically motivated, including references to FBI involvement. The segment argues that personal tragedy does not grant the right to take away the constitutional rights of others or demand "reparations" through the legal system.

victimhood· reparations· emotional trauma· fbi· fraudulent complaints

34:30 We all knew our government, we all knew politicians were corrupt but we're really seeing how bad it is now. So here's the new Democrat strategy declare somebody guilty in the court of public opinion just in general not even on the basics of a certain issue or topic just in general this person is guilty in the court of public opinion they're bad they're guilty and they run all their propaganda and they run all their hit pieces You can say Alex Jones is an example. You could say Donald Trump is an example, you could say Steve Bannon Roger Stone. You can show the examples so they just declare you guilty your bad in the court of public opinion then when they get you into courtroom they just say oh you're guilt and that's a new process so innocent until proven guilty a cornerstone

35:27 of our legal system, a cornerstone of justice in this country. Innocent till proven guilty is being thrown out the window now we all know why so whether you love Alex Jones or you hate Alex Jones if you don't understand the implications of saying innocent till proven guilty no longer applies here innocent till proven guilty We're going to take that cornerstone out of our Justice and Legal System Foundation If you don't understand how that hurts you, if you don't understand how that goes beyond Alex Jones whether you love him or hate him then then you have been blinded. You have been lobotomized and you have been propagandized into celebrating your own demise and a lot of that goes on specifically in reference to liberals and democrats they celebrate getting rid of the first amendment. They celebrate getting rid of the second amendment

36:34 And they don't even understand how they're celebrating their own demise. It's incredible levels of propaganda and they just think, oh we got Alex Jones! I got Alex Jones not even a victory for them They don't know Alex Jones They don't even listen to Alex Jones They don't know anything about Alex Jones But they just are told Alex Jones is bad and if we get Alex Jones that's a victory for me Even if I have to sacrifice my own prosperity My own future My own rights I got Alex Jones I feel accomplished Not understanding how Alex's fate Is their own fate So we go back to the legal experts now again on why people should be concerned about this case. I'm here to defend Alex Jones in the court of public opinion because i believe him, because Alex Jones is innocent of a lot of the claims that have been made against him and when he gets the damages even if you say okay

37:29 I think this case should have gone on. I don't believe in the constitutional defense, I don't believe in the procedural defense, and I do not believe in statutory rights." Okay! How much money is Alex Jones supposed to pay? Some of people that are suing are like not even related to people who died there Is everybody supposed to just start getting big checks, big checks? Even though they never complained at the time about Alex Jones. I mean we kind of all know that these are fraudulent complaints. These people didn't suffer great emotional trauma because of what Alex Jones said they're lying about and they think...I mean i suffered a lot of tragedies in my lifetime you know what that doesn't give me a right to line my pockets with other people's money and it doesn't give me the right to take away other people's rights

38:08 And everybody's scared because like, man these people suffered a horrible trauma. Again some of the people suing didn't Some of them are just like FBI guys. What a crock! But for those that did suffer horrible trauma, yeah that's terrible it doesn't give you the right to line your pockets with other people's money for trauma you know you didn't really suffer because of what they said and it doesn't give you or the right uh to take away other people's rights the freedom of speech freedom in the press and the second amendment just because you don't like what happened. And so at some point, trauma this victim identification idea that hey I'm a victim and now morally superior. I'm a victim now i get to dictate to everybody what's going to happen with their rights Now I get to demand money from other people like reparations like other things. I don't agree with that as a fundamental premise and it scared too many people off

CHAPTER 10 / 41 Discussion

Debunking Myths of Harassment and Stalking

Claims that Alex Jones incited followers to stalk or harass Sandy Hook families are dismissed as media myths. Robert Barnes points out that InfoWars editor Paul Joseph Watson was consistently critical of those questioning the event. He predicts that the trial will fail to produce a single witness who was directly harassed by someone acting on Jones's specific instructions.

megyn kelly· paul joseph watson· harassment· stalking· media myths

39:00 from defending Alex Jones in these cases, because they're like, geez I don't want to be on the side against the Sandy Hook parents. And I'm just tired of it to be honest with you. No and Robert, I can tell you like the pushback I got from even the prospect of having Alex Jones on for a sidebar with you people that people just have they have a misconception of Alex Jones to begin with but setting that aside one thing i want to touch on I remember at the time The parents who were suing and the plaintiffs who were suing said that they were receiving harassment, they were getting stalked and doxed and harassed by people who are incited or influenced or motivated by Alex Jones's discourse. I remember hearing it at the time and just taking it for granted

39:45 But now I wonder in retrospect whether or not that was accurate. It's not a pro-Alex documentary, but it is pretty reasonable one in terms of being balanced and appropriate. But in that documentary repeated what Megyn Kelly had said where defense lawyer for someone who blamed InfoWars for this person stalking somebody that was connected to Sandy Hook.

40:21 The problem is, if you dig into the record that wasn't really true. That was a defense lawyer looking for an excuse that he thought a liberal judge would buy as to go down on sentencing InfoWars because how you would know that? Because if you actually followed and read InfoWars at the time You knew that Paul Joseph Watson, the editor of InfoWars Was always critical of anybody who raised questions about Sandy Hook You knew how often InfoWars said Sandy Hook happened. You knew that through most of the time period, Alex Jones always said InfoWars that Sandy Hook happened so you knew how that was an exceptional and occasional and rare and not customary opinion So you know his people weren't behind any of it into my knowledge wait for trial My guess is they will not produce one person

CHAPTER 12 / 41 Discussion

Class Power and Lawyers in Government

The prevalence of lawyers in the U.S. Congress and the UK Parliament is criticized as a consolidation of power within a single professional class. In the UK, the Labor Party is noted for shifting from actual laborers and coal miners to a group of "woke" lawyers. The segment advocates for dispersing power among ordinary people with diverse life experiences rather than a small managerial elite.

congress· labor party· uk politics· professional class· power dispersal

44:06 One last question, Robert. He gets to appeal obviously? Yes the problem is they can often collect on judgments while the appeal is pending and they clearly want to go in and seize all of Infowars and shut them down overnight that's their goal here And they have a judge who completely disrespects the rule of law so will likely try to accommodate that Okay alright now let's do it now Why is it not considered a conflict of interest for lawyers to be the ones writing and voting on law? Well, I think we have too many lawyers in Congress. Too many lawyers in all these positions and that's true like the UK same problem they used to have a bunch of labor labor union Labor Party used actually be laborers coal miners and people like that

44:46 Go back to the 40s, go back to the 50's in the UK. No they don't exist! The Labour Party is a bunch of lawyers and that's why they're a bunch of wolfsters This is a class of people we cannot allow to have power Power should be dispersed amongst ordinary people who have a diverse set of life experiences Not a small professional managerial class that thinks their God's gift to the world Mark in Florida, you're on the air. Alex thank you for taking my call first time caller long-time listener I'm a self employed 66 year old senior who last November moved from the suburbs of Detroit to leave the Nazi governor moved through the panhandle of Florida and at the time my family and friends thought I'd lost my mind they no longer think that way but it's time they did and I want to say God bless you stay on here the devil is a liar

CHAPTER 13 / 41 Discussion

Alex Jones on Satire and Performance Art Claims

Alex Jones addresses the media narrative that he is merely a "performance artist," explaining that this claim originated from a custody battle involving his ex-wife. He clarifies that while he performs satire and imitations of characters like The Joker, Cobra Commander, and Darth Vader, his role as a news commentator is authentic. He argues that the media uses his comedic moments to discredit his serious reporting on topics like "sudden adult death syndrome."

performance artist· satire· darth vader· joker· custody battle

47:19 Where do we say that? We never said that. They just say, we said that But where's the clip? Where is the article? Where do we say that doesn't exist Alex Jones is playing a character and he's a performance artist Jones is playing a character on his radio show The radio rants of Alex Jones are just an act He's actually a performance artist He's a performance artist Alex Jones is a fake They're lying to you because they think you're stupid. And it's all based on the custody battle with my ex-wife five years ago, and she was trying to put into evidence me dressed up more than a decade before like The Joker being sarcastic saying take your Prozac kids take your illegal drugs too You'll die it's fun so people wouldn't take drugs

48:09 And they wanted to enter that in evidence, say look he's insane telling kids to use drugs. My lawyer went when Jack Nicholson plays the part of The Joker no one thinks that's really Jack Nicholson so yeah when I've been Cobra Commander or Optimus Prime Or The Joker because i can do imitations of them all really good...or Darth Vader Don't act so surprised globalist you didn't think you could silence the American people did you? Do I really think I'm Darth Vader? No. Do I think I'm Optimus Prime, the Cobra Commander or The Joker? No and clearly no reasonable person would think when i'm doing satire that what I'm saying is what I really think. No one believes in Babylon Bee it's not trying to lie to you its being sarcastic. Buy the Vaccinate Miamo doll today! It's required by the CDC but they play those games

49:03 And that's why I don't joke around as much as I used to. Even though, I tell people okay this is a joke this isn't serious they clip it out and they say no This is what he really believes. Every day when I leave work, I do this. That man's a threat to this country and they go look he admitted in court that he was an actor Well yeah! I was an actor in Scanner Darkly...I was an actor in Waking Life....I was an actor when I was Cobra Commander But it doesn't mean that Alex Jones the talk show host up here reading news articles isn't a real thing And you know that

49:41 You're insulted right now, I'm even explaining that to you. And so am I but that's who these people are! You don't know the power of the dark side. Am i really Darth Vader? I think Alex Jones seems really talented he's smart He's funny as hell it's truly funny... I'm kind of retarded Now that I've done those imitations, those little jokes. Do you now not listen to what I say about other things when i show you a powerful news article by Dr Joseph Mercola on Infowars.com? It has all the cited information the latest tragedy sudden adult death syndrome No! That's a real thing

50:30 That's something happening in the real world. And that's what we're breaking down here today. I am Alex Jones, and I am the guy on this show every day. I'm an American, and that's what I promote is freedom and justice and liberty and they can't stand it. Pesky earth creatures! And we've got Robert Barnes in studio with us now. We just heard from him on the Viva Free podcast, Great Legal Breakdown and in the next segment what I want to do is kind of a simulation Now Bob is not representing Alex in any cases he's not legal counsel here He's just here as an independent

CHAPTER 14 / 41 Discussion

Implications of Rigged Jury Selection

The jury selection process in Austin and Connecticut is described as a mechanism to stack the court with prejudiced individuals. Robert Barnes explains that the right to a trial by jury, established in the Magna Carta and the Seventh Amendment, is being undermined by judges who exclude impartial jurors. He warns that if these rights are stripped from Alex Jones, they can be stripped from any American citizen.

jury selection· impartial jury· magna carta· seventh amendment· due process

51:31 legal commentary, let's just say. And so I want to kind of do a simulation in the next segment of what would your opening statements be? Just as a lawyer that's neutral not involved in this case but before we do that it's hard to really Talk about the implications of this case right because we're still in the present I mean, we're still dealing with it now just like when Alex was being censored Yeah We can talk about we think they're gonna center the president next they're gonna censor members of Congress But people didn't really believe those implications. They couldn't really see them coming It's it's kind of a hard thing to foresight but now we have a test case with the censorship and I think a test case With what's going on in court? How do we properly lay out the implications

52:18 of the results of this court case with Alex Jones so that the American public doesn't get bamboozled into thinking, hey if we get Alex Jones scalped thats a victory but to understand no there's much bigger implications for the average American and for the country than just Alex Jones or Alex Jones like people are supporters. Oh absolutely I mean this case is about the power of the American judicial system to strip you have all your core rights and liberties when somebody accuses you doing something wrong Because if they can do it to Alex Jones, just like what happened with social media. They can do it to you and the goal is to prove that they can strip you of all your rights due process of law those rights include the rights to bring things like motions to dismiss motions for anti-slap motions motion for summary judgment your right to seek discovery your right a privacy against invasive discovery

53:08 All of those rights have been violated in the case of Alex Jones and every court that has adjudicated these Sandy Hook cases, both in Austin Texas and Connecticut. But it's not just that they've also stripped him of his right to appeal some of those rulings a right to an appeal any slap motion in the case of Connecticut or write to this uh... appealing summary judgment motion in the case of texas now only that they've also now stripped him of his right to trial by jury there's a reason why the magna cartes fundamental assertion most critical essential procedural right to guarantee substance of freedoms and liberties was the right to trial by jury What has happened here? He is not allowed to have a right of trial by jury on the substantive merits of the suit. He's not even allowed to have a right of trial by jury on many issues that are legally related, whether or not he caused any damages for people seeking relief in court

54:00 And that's gonna keep going further as we probably will see and witness in the jury selection process. The court is likely to preclude and exclude those jurors who are capable of being impartial, and try to stack the jury with prejudiced jurors who have a preconceived conclusion about the case further inflamed by their judge's ruling. So this is about does the rule of law still govern America? Do you still have a right of trial by jury? Do you have a right to due process of law, do you have a right of privacy because if they strip those rights from Alex Jones your next just like happened in the social media context. Well and I've seen what happens in the court of public opinion now with the power of mainstream media which is just totally allied with the Democrat party. You want to talk about collusion, you want to talk about fascism there it is the media and the Democrat party where...I have friends this is what I say is the power that I have friends

CHAPTER 15 / 41 Discussion

Comparison to the OJ Simpson Trial and Rigged Outcomes

The Alex Jones trial is contrasted with the OJ Simpson case, where Simpson was acquitted in a court of law despite being guilty in the court of public opinion due to police misconduct. In the Jones case, the hosts argue the legal system is ignoring procedural integrity to ensure a guilty verdict. The trial is characterized as a "Salem-style witch trial" where the jury is only allowed to hear about the plaintiffs' trauma, not the defendant's innocence.

oj simpson· evidence tampering· rigged trial· witch trial· inquisition

54:51 that know me, have known me my entire life. And they'll find some media story about me and if they even have the courage they'll send it to me and say hey what's going on? But more often than not cases they see it and start talking with other people about how I'm bad and how I did this and they can't believe I would do this stuff It's like, you know me. You know me! And they still fall for the propaganda They still say oh wow Owen Troy I've known him my whole life No he's not this no he's not that but Oh My Gosh I just saw this hit piece and now everything changes my mind So i've seen in real time how the court of public opinion can be swayed so easily with the propaganda media But here's an example, and I think this is kind of a... it'll tell us where we're at as far as how it impacts the legal system. Now this might be a stretch because the cases are obviously different but I look at the OJ Simpson trial. OJ Simpson is still guilty in the court of public opinion. Still guilty! He's not going to be found guilty in a court of law Why? Because in that process police planted evidence tampered with the crime scene And the judge said

55:53 I'm out like that's it you he could be guilty of sin but the fact that you tampered with evidence, the fact that you planted evidence. You tamper with a crime scene i can't listen to anything you can't be trusted The case is done so OJ Simpson guilty in the court of public opinion but because the way that the actual legal system works and the prosecutors blew the case the police blew the case OJ Simpson walks So now I think we have kind of different thing where They wanna build the court of opinion of guilty against Alex Jones, but then in the process doesn't even matter. Doesn't matter what they find in the process he's guilty we're gonna rule him guilty The decision is not whether it was innocent or guilty but how guilty he is Oh completely and that why they have stripped him his ability to defend himself That's why they've stripped all those procedural remedies That's why they don't want I mean imagine here you have an Austin Democratic liberal jury That's Austin Texas very liberal a jury pool Connecticut very liberal jury pool

56:46 The courts are so scared and terrified of even a liberal Democratic jury hearing the actual evidence in the case that they are preventing Alex Jones from giving them any of that evidence, even making argument about it. Even asking questions about it So what's going to happen in this case is they're going to try and rig the jury pool, and after they try to rig the jury pool. They're going to tell the jury that the only evidence the jury is allowed to hear is the trauma of the plaintiff. Trauma that doesn't relate to Alex Jones! But Alex Jones lawyers will not even be allowed to ask them whether something else might have caused their trauma or whether many people have been all over TV news all over the place

57:26 So, I mean did public discussion of their name concern them when they were publicly disclosing their own name everywhere? But those questions can't even be asked. You can ask the same honest question you could in any other courtroom in America and any other comparable case in America This is all unparalleled and unprecedented There is no example of denying a party their ability to say, hey I'm innocent. Denying a party saying hey I didn't cause you those injuries Hey I didn't intend any harm to you Hey by the way I didn't do 90% of the things that you think I did So I mean, for example watch in this trial there will be no evidence. This is my prediction right now there'll be no evidence that anybody stalked or directly harass any of these plaintiffs at the demander request of Alex Jones. That will turn out to have been a huge lie well they don't want the world to know that's a huge lie so what do they do? They don't allow Alex Jones to talk about it. They don't let him present evidence of it. They don't let him testimony on his own behalf

58:24 it, they don't allow his lawyers to even talk about it to the jury or ask questions of witnesses. This is a rigged trial this is I said it looks like 19th century Australia all kangaroos and railroads and that's precisely what this case looks like and it is a disgrace to the rule of law And people have asked, why do I speak out about it when I don't represent Infowars? I don't represent Alex Jones. This is my own independent opinion on the subject. It is because it is an outrage to the rule of law that should scare and terrify every American that this can happen. And we need to call it out in a court of public opinion expose for fraud on the law that it is so that we ultimately maybe can get justice through legislative process or the appellate process

59:02 Well, and it's like a bait-and-switch or like Indiana Jones in the Temple of Doom when he has to take the gold trinket out and put the bag on it where it's like okay here's Here's somebody that's suffering greatly because the loss of life Suffering greatly because of a tragedy then that's there on the podium. And you say look they're suffering This is a horrible tragedy But then you up take that away and put Alex Jones there and say see Alex Jones Is the reason your suffering? Completely, and they're not even allowed to tell the jury maybe their suffering is due to the shooter. Maybe this suffering is due to school safety lapses. Maybe they're suffering is due to politicians lying about those school safety lapses. They are not allowed to talk about any of that! They are only allowed to say listen to my trauma blame Alex Jones.

59:45 That's it. They're not allowed to hear or see anything else and this is after rigging everything else that goes into the case in terms of procedure, in terms of substantive law, in terms of jury selections and so like I mean It wouldn't surprise me if you have a juror get up there and say hold on a second we're only here to award money for hurt feelings, that's it. There is nothing else and someone a juror who speaks like that is likely to get struck by this judge because the judge wants a jury that preordained guilt This isn't inquisition this is true witch trial Salem style except there is no substantive merits behind many of the allegations an accusations raised Now I do want to do a kind simulation mock opening statement with Bob Barnes today but

CHAPTER 17 / 41 Discussion

Mock Opening Statement for the Defense

Robert Barnes delivers a simulated opening statement for the Alex Jones defense, focusing on the failure of local politicians to secure Sandy Hook Elementary. He argues that the blame should lie with those who failed to provide locking doors and effective safety mechanisms, rather than a broadcaster asking questions. The mock statement concludes by asking for a "zero verdict" to affirm the right of Americans to demand answers from their government.

opening statement· school safety· big pharma· mental health· zero verdict

1:09:11 A fourth side of the process is who do they strike for cause, who do they not strike for cause? So there's a lot of different ways to rig a jury outcome. You don't have to read John Grisham's Runaway Jury to figure that out. Well John Grisham great author one of the best to put these into books ever all right Bob Barnes with us we're gonna do a simulated opening statement from Bob Barnes when we come back Don't Go Anywhere All right, Robert Barnes in studio with us. I want to just do a simulation and just to be clear here, Robert Barnes is not representing Alex Jones in this case he's not legally involved in this case at all He is just simply doing legal commentary as a legal expert right now

1:09:48 And obviously just following the case and so many other cases, a great voice of reason to go to. So I just kind of want to do a simulated opening statement here from Bob Barnes on Alex Jones' case that begins this week. Folks, I imagine the media coverage of this is going to be pretty crazy. We'll see when it really heats up but i don't think they're gonna just kind of put this as a side case. I think they're gonna wanna bring it to the fore Whenever it's advantageous for them or they feel it's advantageous for them, but aside from that Let's go to Bob Barnes now, just a simulated opening statement. We're just doing legal commentary here if Bob Barnes was representing Alex Jones he is not but if he was Robert what would be your opening statement? So in the defense of Alex Jones the opening statement really is kind of simple and straightforward why are the jurors there The real reason what everybody really wanted to know is what exactly happened in the case of Sandy Hook

1:10:46 And what jurors mostly don't know, and most ordinary people don't know is what happened in terms of the cover up of Sandy Hook by politicians connected to Sandy Hook. And why people were suspicious of what was going on at Sandy Hook? The reason was because the school system had pocketed money meant for school safety And in fact, they did not even have the mechanisms and means in place for the teachers to be able to lock their doors. To prevent a shooter from coming into the room or even coming into the bathroom where some of them within the classroom also didn't have a lock on the door where they could even try to keep the children safe

1:11:24 That big lie about the local politicians keeping the schools safe when they had not, when they had failed a fundamental test was the number one thing that politicians in Sandy Hook had to cover up. And they have the willing complicity of the press and the willing complicity of Obama White House because they wanted the blame to all shift to the gun and the gun manufacturer, and Second Amendment rights in America. That being the cause of the traumatic tragic death of these young children rather than politicians pocketing money meant for school safety and failing to employ effective school safety mechanisms that would come to haunt Americans in other places

1:12:06 all across the country because of those schools lack of effective school safety systems in years to come. And because of it, they covered up information related to open records act sunshine laws for your request etc and that in turn triggered a lot of people's concerns and questions that led them down often the erroneous path as to what had happened in Sandy Hook but But people asking questions as to what was really going on and what really happened is something we should want to have happen in America. We shouldn't want to discourage and dissuade, asking basic core questions about big public events that impact things as important as the school safety of young children

1:12:47 So why are we here in this case? We're here in this case because the objective is to blame Alex Jones for the horrifying tragedy and trauma that occurred in Sandy Hook. But Alex Jones wasn't the person who decided not to use school safety mechanisms effectively, so Alex Jones isn't the person who decided not to lock the doors or even provide a means to lock the doors for first-school children Alex Jones isn't the one who failed to have an effective school safety response system or school safety personnel located at the scene. Alex Jones is not the one that is the one who pulled the trigger, Alex Jones was the one exposing questions about big pharma and poor mental health of young disturbed men in America

1:13:29 Alex Jones was the one talking about the glorification of violence in video games and aspects of Hollywood that is meant to create these kind of problems rather than cure these kinds of problems. Alex Jones is the one talking about the necessity for school safety to be real and meaningful, and it often means having good people with guns available to defend against bad people with guns Alex Jones raised questions, some of his questions by his own acknowledgement. By zoning admission he didn't get right nobody is 100% right but what Alex Jones didn't do is cause the death of these young children. What Alex Jones didn't do was fail to put basic school safety tests in place when Alex Jones didn't do was many of the things that people have assumed he did or blamed him for. Alex Jones simply raised question and

1:14:17 And some of those questions were on the right track. And they were questions the press should have been asking, but wasn't our politicians should have been asking but weren't and our public was entitled to answers too, but didn't get and so instead they want you to say that because of the horrific tragedy that happened that day just blame Alex Jones Don't blame anybody else. Don't blame big pharma, don't blame the media, don't blame the school safety officials, don't blame the politicians, don't blame other people that are not treating our mental health of our young men well. Don't blame any of that instead just blame Alex Jones because he asked questions and some of the questions didn't turn out to be right but some of them turned out to be very right

1:15:00 And that is why you're really here. It's the attempt to say that any emotional trauma experienced by anybody connected to that tragedy is solely and wholly the fault of Alex Jones, when Alex Jones isn't the reason why that Sandy Hook happened just like Alex Jones isn't the real reason we're here We are here because this case is about your right to ask questions your right to demand answers, your right to get meaningful remedies. That's why we're really here they want to deny you the American people the right to ask those questions they wanted and I you the American people the right to demand answers they wanted and I you the American people the means to be able to best protect our young children

1:15:40 And that's why we're here. So the only verdict is a verdict that affirms our right to ask questions, that affirms our right to demand answers and it affirms the right to meaningful school safety protection in America and that is not aided by suppressing those questions censoring those answer or putting Alex Jones in a permanent gag box That is what the case is about. That's what you're being asked to decide, do the thing that is right through the thing that is American and that means a zero verdict against Alex Jones now let's think about the precedent that could be said here Now, there might not be a law written. Right? But... Oh Alex Jones questions major event his entire life is destroyed his company is destroyed he's bankrupted we all know the story well guess what you don't need to write a law for people to see that and say boy I'm not gonna question anything if they do that they do that to Alex but let's just take a look at recent history Jussie Smollett fakes a hate crime

CHAPTER 18 / 41 Discussion

Precedents for Questioning Official Narratives

The importance of questioning official narratives is highlighted using examples like the Jussie Smollett hoax, the Russian collusion investigation, and the Hunter Biden laptop story. The segment argues that if questioning becomes a punishable offense, propaganda will permanently influence national policy. Historical events like the Gulf of Tonkin and the USS Liberty are cited as reasons why the public must remain skeptical of government claims.

jussie smollett· russian collusion· hunter biden laptop· false flags· gulf of tonkin

1:16:37 Well, are you allowed to question that or is that propaganda allowed to persist as fact even though we all know it was fake? What about Russian collusion? Remember Russian collusion Donald Trump Russian collusion totally fake news totally made up. Are you not allowed to question that so propaganda can become fact and influence policy What about the Uvalde shooting? We now know, the cops stood down. It was a good guy with a gun that had to bring down the shooter and save lives. What if you weren't able to question that we wouldn't know about the horrific police response that day. But what about the Hunter Biden laptop they said oh that's not real it's Russian misinformation its Russian propaganda don't look at that don't question that. The laptop was very real so this is just modern history I mean were not even getting into the Gulf of Tonkin

1:17:21 and other false flags that have led to wars. I think the USS Liberty, all these other incidents so setting the precedent of someone gets to run propaganda, someone gets to run with a lie you don't get to question it and then that propaganda, that lie is able to influence policy which is then able to influence permanent law and it's all based off a false flag, it's all based off of a lie. So if they can set that precedent in this case whether they have to write laws or not There's going to be major impact when it comes to free speech and media coverage of big events in this country,

1:17:59 depending on how this case goes. Oh, absolutely and for people to understand out there just look at what the Texas Court of Appeals said they said and you look at some of the questions that Alex Jones has been asked it's if you question in any narrative approved by the government and anybody feels offended uh has hurt feelings over your questioning the institutional narrative they can now sue you into bankruptcy because they don't like your questions And it is much more important to have the right to question than it is to preclude people from asking the wrong questions. That's what this case is all about, just because somebody doesn't get every question right and answer right there's no reason or justification to stop them from asking questions and demanding answers in the first place

1:18:42 For all the great historical reasons we know about, what if you couldn't ask about whether vaccines were really safe and effective? What if you couldn't ask about whether a war is really justified or necessary. We need these questions. We need Alex Joneses of the world asking those questions because we, the American people demand answers and we're entitled to them All right, final segment here with Bob Barnes who is going to be covering this trial as it's ongoing. It could last weeks... Who knows how long it could go folks? A lot of stuff we're just beginning the process now and again to clarify Bob Barnes not representing us he's just here as his own legal commentator

CHAPTER 19 / 41 Discussion

The Difficulty of Winning Defamation Cases

Defamation is described as one of the most difficult legal cases to win because the plaintiff must prove specific financial losses and "reckless disregard for the truth." Robert Barnes references his work with the Covington Kids to show how difficult it is for victims of media lies to get a remedy. He argues that the standards for defamation are being "obliterated" specifically to target Alex Jones.

media law· defamation· financial damages· covington kids· malice

1:19:20 And he hosts podcasts and stuff as well. But you know, let's kind of get into the defamation angle of this not even necessarily directly involved with the Jones case here but just as a more general coverage of defamation because I've looked into this When I had to get my degree in media, actually the hardest college class ever took was Media Law. My God! You know how much you have to read when you go through law school that was the one law class I took it's like ridiculous how much we had to learn but i learned about defamation and more about working for an attorney growing up And here is what my understanding of defamation was

1:20:00 and I still believe it is the case designed this way. It is so hard to win a defamation case, it's one of the hardest cases that you can possibly win and that's why you don't really see or hear much about it Here's an example...I could go right now and present dozens maybe even hundreds of cases articles videos all this stuff on how I've been defamed Lies about me hit pieces against me. They're everywhere now I've brought this to lawyers and you know what the challenge is they say okay? Well, there's no doubt that there's a there's an aspect of defamation here The problem is how do you prove losses in court? How do you prove that?

1:20:43 because somebody said this or somebody said that, even if they know they're lying. Even if it's clearly false information how do you prove financial damages in court? Because that's really what the defamation law comes down to right is okay well you've been defamed what did it cost you we're going to give you a reward for the damages so sure I could go into a court of law present dozens of cases of how I've been defamed, but then how do I equate that to potential lost earnings? Because that's one of the hardest things to prove. Potential loss earnings is one of the hardest things approved so you don't really see that in a court of law very often but generally speaking, that's how I understand defamation what your understanding and background being involved in legal process for decades of defamation and then how does it apply modern day

1:21:32 And how do you see its application changing over the years? So I've been doing this work on both sides, plaintiffs and defense side in the defamation context because of its constitutional implications for freedom of press, freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of association. For the better part of a quarter century, I represented The Covington Kids. Now let's use that as an example there The Covington Kids were targeted by a bunch of powerful people lied about, they tried to destroy their lives, their careers and futures. They ended up being subject to death threats and firebombing something that was a really direct connection compared to what I think the evidence will show in this case involving Alex Jones and Sandy Hook. And what happened? Judges said nope you can't sue! They said you can't sue because of this or that or something else

1:22:15 That gives you an idea that those kids can't are we're having to go through the appellate process, gonna have to go through the legislative reform process to ever get meaningful remedy. Yet here in the Sandy Hook cases they've obliterated all of those rules limiting the constitutional scope of defamation so what's one so defamation is supposed to be when you make a specifically false statement of fact about a specifically identified individual that leads, that causes them both emotional harm and reputational harm in their local community. and that you do so with a certain state of mind, a certain mens rea. What is usually called malice and in this case it's reckless disregard of the truth that you knew at the time you made this statement basically that the statement wasn't true or likely to be true about that individual

CHAPTER 20 / 41 Discussion

Group Libel and the Alex Jones Exception

The legal concept of "colloquium" requires a false statement to be about a specific individual, yet the Jones case is proceeding as "group libel," which is generally not recognized under the Constitution. Barnes argues that the court has created an "Alex Jones exception" to the First Amendment and due process. He warns that this converts defamation law into "dissident heresy laws" used to bankrupt political opponents.

group libel· new york times v sullivan· colloquium· dissident heresy· first amendment

1:23:07 Now look at this in the constitutional requirement of what's called colloquium. This goes all the way back to The New York Times versus Sullivan, this is why I don't believe any of the cases against Alex Jones should even be in court and a constitutionally honest court would have thrown out these cases years ago Why do I say that? Because there's a requirement under the Constitution as the court, US Supreme Court said in New York Times versus Sullivan that you must make a specifically false statement about a specified individual. In that particular case they made a statement about a group But generally this is called group libel, it's not recognized constitutionally or under the tort law of defamation in individual states. It needs to be about sufficiently about you that people knew it was about you not because your group of 100 or 50 or 200. That its really about you goes all the way back to a case in New York where one group made false statements

1:24:07 about a group of salesmen with which there are only 10 in that department. There are other false statements made about a group in which there were more than 50, then the court said in the group that's more than 50 they don't know this statement is about you, that too many people and the group that's ten okay they probably do think this statement is about you because it sufficiently few So look at the Sandy Hook cases. In the Sandy Hook cases, and almost all of them there's no allegation that Alex Jones said a specifically false fact about a specific individual not there so what did the court say? The court said we're going to ignore the constitutional requirement of colloquium We're gonna ignore the tort law of defamation. We're gonna ignore the intentional infliction of emotional distress limitations on torts

1:24:48 and say that now you can sue if you're part of any group, that somebody could look you up on the internet and see whether maybe your part of that group even if that group is 100 or 200 or 300 or 1,000 or more. This is in direct refutation and a direct opposition to every court case in the history of the country on class libel claims So they have made special standards for Alex Jones. Not only is he not allowed due process of law, not only is he not allowed trial by jury, not only is he not allowed to say he's innocent in the case, not only is he not allowed to an impartial jury process, he's also not allowed to have the same constitutional and tort protections that have applied to everybody from time immemorial in terms of governing libel laws. So that's why it goes

1:25:34 Anybody could be put at risk now. So you go out there and you make a statement about that can be referenced to a broad group of people, so let's say you go out there and say, You know what? COVID vaccines are not vaccines they're not safe they're not effective Now somebody who feels injured by that Okay, now under existing Texas law the Alex Jones exception to the First Amendment. The Alex Jones exception of the Constitution. The Alex Jones exception a due process. The Alex Jones exception to trial by jury. Now suddenly you can be individually and separately sued for any hurt emotions they feel and they can pick a politicized venue that is weaponized against you in the judicial injury process

1:26:12 And that is why this case is so dangerous and consequential. Because constitutionally it puts the First Amendment at risk, constitutionally it puts due process at risk, constitutionally it puts the right to trial by jury at risk but also its gutting the purpose and principle of defamation law on the real purpose is to make government identified misinformation. In other words, what people in power call misinformation to allow individuals to weaponize the legal system, to allow individuals to sue you into oblivion and bankruptcy into permanent censorship and suppression of information because you are a dissident. It is basically converting defamation law into dissident heresy laws. That's what the... Basically Alex Jones on trial for heresy

CHAPTER 21 / 41 Discussion

Selective Prosecution and Weaponized Lawfare

A double standard in justice is alleged, where Democrats like Eric Holder and Stephen Colbert's staffers avoid charges for actions that lead to the imprisonment of Trump supporters. Defamation and contempt of Congress are identified as the new tools of "weaponized lawfare" used to destroy the political opposition. Barnes encourages the audience to support the InfoWars store as the "frontline" against this suppression.

lawfare· selective prosecution· stephen colbert· david hogg· eric holder

1:26:55 That's what it really is. And that's what they're trying to do to everybody, ultimately using Alex Jones as the means to do so and it's not consistent with defamation law, not consistent with the constitution. But hey if it puts money in my pocket and if it hurts by political opposition then oh let's do it anyway Now here's what I'm concerned about, because here is the pattern that I've seen. Is that defamation is just going to become another legal tool for the Democrat party to destroy its opposition. Basically only one side of the aisle gets to use it. Here are some other examples contempt of court or contempt of Congress. Eric Holder, he gets to walk no charges. Steve Bannon? He gets arrested How about disruption of Congress David Hogg? He gets to disrupt Congress never arrested never charged nothing Owen Schroeder though I'm still in court three years later for doing it how about illegal entry into the Capitol Stephen Colbert staffers good for them charges dropped note no harm no foul but if you're a Trump supporter American patriot your still in jail your suffering the full extent of law

1:27:55 Is defamation going to become the new legal weapon of the Democrats to destroy their opposition when it never is applied to them? Absolutely. It's going to be a one-side selective means of prosecution and suppression What it is, its recreating the old church Recreating old heresy trials And being able to lock up dissident thinkers Suppress dissident thinkers censored dissident thinkers using lawfare, weaponized lawfare to do it. As I've told people Alex Jones was in business for 25 years never faced a meaningful lawsuit of any kind then Donald J Trump wins office to the presidency of the United States People realize how influential Alex Jones's audience is so they decide to try and take out the audience

1:28:34 by trying to take out Alex Jones. And that's why I say the frontline, Alex Jones that was supposed to break is you the audience it's people who continue to go to info war store and make themselves healthier wealthier and wiser by buying products that are good for them that keep Alex Jones on the air and you weren't supposed to do that. You were supposed to fold, you were supposed to capitulate, you're supposed when you heard Revere's cry, supposed to hide under your bed not get your musket and get out ready to defend the country because ordinary everyday people have rallied to the cry of Alex Jones and defend Alex Jones. The only way they're gonna censor and suppress Alex Jones is if they stop his heart from beating because as long as his heart is beating freedom in Alex Jones will stay alive and that's only possible because you the audience helped make it possible

1:29:18 Bob Barnes, he is gonna be here with us covering the legal case all week. So he'll be popping in and out. Be sure to pay attention here. Thank you Robert for coming in to join me on The Alex Jones Show and shop at Infowarsstore.com folks keep us on the air At this point best-case scenario Is a few years of hard times for us all And if we don't turn it around soon Then it will only get worse But as bad as things are, we still have time to prepare. And that alone is something to be grateful for. A gravity water filter will provide you with clean healthy water even in the event of your taps getting shut off and having your own food will save you from getting ensnared in government FEMA camps. And if you've already stocked up enough for your own family, you might want to consider stocking up for your neighbors

CHAPTER 22 / 41 Discussion

Steve Bannon Contempt Conviction and Executive Privilege

The conviction of Steve Bannon for contempt of Congress is criticized as a foregone conclusion in a 94% Democrat district. Robert Barnes argues that the judge denied Bannon the right to present a defense based on executive privilege. He predicts the conviction will be reversed on appeal, asserting that a judicial order should be required before Congress can prosecute an individual for invoking privilege.

steve bannon· contempt of congress· executive privilege· peter navarro· supreme court

1:30:17 Some of your neighbors might not be prepared for what's coming, but you can help them by having an abundance of storable foods and water filtration. Whoever sows bountifully will also reap bountifully. Stock up now at preparetoday.com The Bannon conviction, if this is treated like an ordinary case two misdemeanors in the District of Columbia at most probation. What do you think of this verdict and what's likely to happen him? Entirely predictable and entirely in violation of the Constitution. The only provision of the Constitution which appears basically twice is trial by jury, in front of a fair jury. Number one he's not- He didn't have a fair jury. Number two the judge took his defenses away from him. The judge denied him a jury trial

1:31:12 They wouldn't allow him to put on evidence that he believed that there was an executive privilege involved and he wanted a judicial determination before he violated the executive privilege. That issue could not be presented to the jury, so as I predicted on this show or other shows before, the conviction was a foregone conclusion. The only issue is will it be reversed by appeal either by the appellate court in the District of Columbia or by the Supreme Court? I think it's very likely that this conviction will be reversed at some point. I suppose the political overlay is the obvious, I mean i always like juries respect juries have tried cases before juries in this community but this is a community of 94 percent democrat

1:31:55 Well, not only that but probably 97% Trump haters. And all you had to do is ladies and gentlemen the jury this man Bannon worked for Trump. That's the end of the case! And then he wants to put on defense that he was executive privilege and the judge says no the jury is not going to hear that so even if there were a fair jury The judge denied the jury the basic facts and so the issue in this case has always been a legal one. When Congress holds somebody in contempt, then that person invokes privilege do you get to prosecute or do you have to go to a judge first? Get a judicial order and then if the defendant violates your judicial order

1:32:34 Obviously, that becomes a crime. That didn't happen here. That didn't happen in the Navarro case and the Supreme Court's going to have to resolve that issue and I think it was resolved in favor of requiring a judicial order before Congress can hold somebody in contempt as a major constitutional issue. Take United States today It is living under a kind of totalitarian culture which has never existed in my lifetime and is much worse, in many ways than the Soviet Union.

CHAPTER 23 / 41 Discussion

Media Censorship and Access to Russian Sources

The United States is accused of imposing information constraints that exceed those of the post-Stalin Soviet Union by blocking access to Russian media like RT. This censorship prevents Americans from hearing the perspective of adversaries or reading journalists like Chris Hedges. Figures like Alan Dershowitz, Noam Chomsky, and Russell Brand are noted for recognizing the danger of this authoritarian shift in the American left.

rt· chris hedges· censorship· russia· free access to information

1:33:09 before Gorbachev, go back to the 1970s. People in Soviet Russia could access BBC Voice of America German television if they wanted to find out the news. If today in the United States you want to find out what Prime Minister Lavrov of Russia is saying, can't do it. It's boring Americans are not permitted to hear what Russians are saying can't get Russian television, can't access Russian sources. That means also that fine American journalists like Chris Hedges one of the best is cut out barred from Americans because he happens to have a program running on RT, Russian televisions you want to find out what the adversary is saying which is

1:34:09 of utmost importance. You can maybe tune into Indian state television and find it out, or you can read it on Al Jazeera but the United States has imposed constraints on freedom of access to information which are astonishing and which in fact go beyond what was the case in post-Stalin Soviet Russia So there you have it folks, I mean even Alan Dershowitz. Even Noam Chomsky, Russell Brand these are classical liberals well known as being on the liberal side of the political spectrum but they see the danger of what's happening in US right now and let's just call it what is It's the Democrat party, its' the American left turning into a Stalinistic Hitler-esque authoritarian regime and that's whats going on

1:35:04 And so anybody in denial of that is only welcoming their own demise. Anybody in denial of that, is only welcoming the own shackles that are going to be put on their legs and arms and mind No it's dangerous where things are going in this country... ...and our only hope is that Americans realize it soon enough to stop us from going down this dark path Alright ladies & gentlemen I've done now 2 hours of one of the most important transmissions of InfoWars history, and I'm sure considering the current news cycle and one of the biggest stories ongoing right now. I'm sure our audience number is up today. And I haven't even plugged yet okay? So you have to understand

CHAPTER 24 / 41 Discussion

World Economic Forum and Global Leadership Operatives

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is accused of injecting operatives into global governments, citing the recent uprising in Sri Lanka and the implementation of QR codes for fuel. New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is criticized for a speech in which she told citizens the government is the "single source of truth." The segment frames these leaders as "blood-drenched tyrants" with a motherly facade.

world economic forum· sri lanka· jacinda ardern· new zealand· qr codes

1:41:08 And we hope that you will continue to support us and shop at Infowarsstore.com, vitamin mineral fusion back in stock plus just all the other great supplements that we have there as well Okay quick programming note I am going to be hosting The War Room today and so You see i've got a lot of news on my desk here I haven't even covered a single news story yet I'm going to be doing most of my news coverage coming up on the war room today at three o'clock. So if you're looking for the daily news, three o'clock when i start the war room we're gonna be delving into all the news all the big video clips

1:41:46 I do have Savannah Hernandez coming in studio, uh in about 20 minutes. And we'll be talking to her about her recent reports she just goes everywhere across the country asks people about gas prices how they feel ask people how they feel about Biden she goes into the inner cities where it's just...I mean overwhelmed with drug addicts It's actually really sad some of this stuff that she captures and she goes out there braver than most journalists by the way So we'll be discussing that with her coming up and then again I'm gonna be doing all the news coverage in the three o'clock hour. So let me do this in the meantime, you know here's what because it all kind of comes back to the same problem and that there is a group, a very small group of elitists The best way to trace and track it is via the World Economic Forum

1:42:42 their leaders, what they're doing. Like for example oh they had the uprising in Sri Lanka The president steps down World Economic Forum injects their operative into that presidency now and now they've shut off the gas and you have to have a QR code if you want to get gas That's the World Economic Forum So when you hear statements like this from Jacinda Ardern The failed leader of New Zealand She is telling you the truth I mean, she's as corrupt as the day is long. She's bad as it gets when it comes to leadership roles but she is being honest They're the voice of truth. You don't listen to anything else Here's Jacinda Ardern out of New Zealand telling you how they really feel, you shut up! You have no authority. You have no rights. You have no free speech We're the authority we're in charge you listen to us and you sit down and you shut up here She is saying it in clip two. The most up-to-date information daily. You can trust us as a source of that information And you can also trust the Director General of Health and the Ministry of Health

1:43:45 For that information, do feel free to visit at any time to clarify any rumour you may hear. Otherwise dismiss anything else We will continue to be your single source of truth we will provide information frequently and share everything we can else you see a grain of salt and so I really ask people to focus. What is the greatest example of that appears to be this text which originated in Malaysia and has kind of become a viral hoax in Australia and New Zealand, how irresponsible are the people who are sharing that news about lockdown imminent in New Zealand? Yeah look it's the kind of thing that adds to the anxiety that people feel So I continue to share the message New Zealanders must prepare

1:44:33 but do not panic, prepare. And when you see those messages remember that unless you hear it from us it is not the truth and I really ask people just visit covid19.govt.nz It has all of the up-to-date information and we will continue to provide everything you need Now if you don't understand how dangerous that is If you don't understand how dystopian that is I just don't even know if i can help you. But see this is what the World Economic Forum does, as they give you female leaders so it has that kind of motherly feminine look to it when really it's a blood-drenched tyrant

CHAPTER 25 / 41 Discussion

Two-Tiered Justice and the Alex's War Premiere

The premiere of the documentary "Alex's War" in Austin, Texas, is described as a successful event attended by figures like Glenn Greenwald. Owen Shroyer contrasts the "love and patriotism" at the event with the media's portrayal of the movement. He also discusses the "two-tiered hierarchy of justice," mentioning that Trump supporters remain in jail while others, like Colbert's staffers, have charges dropped.

alex's war· documentary· marjorie taylor greene· mayra flores· glenn greenwald

1:45:12 Ladies and gentlemen, there is a phenomenon happening right now. And you're seeing it somewhat represented in Congress with individuals like Marjorie Taylor Greene or now Mayra Flores You wish you had more examples of men doing this but sadly not so much We do however have a powerful statement from Rand Paul that I want to play here in a second But let me just kind of lay out the build up here Is justice blind? When Democrats are in charge, she is blind deaf and dumb. Now that's the headline from Jim Thompson at red state but everybody can now see how Democrats have politicized every department of the US government the FBI

1:46:04 the DHS, Border Patrol, the executive branch, the judicial branch. The court system I mean everything there it's never been a better example Colbert staffers get their charges dropped for illegally entering the Capitol Trump supporters still rot in jail for the same thing David Hall gets to stand up and disrupt Congress no charges Owen Schroer still in court For something that happened over three years ago now so It's never been more obvious. Democrats can break the law, do whatever they want. Hell, they even riot and burn down cities! It's never been more obvious to the average American people who the bad guys are not even necessarily say Republicans are the good guys it's just obvious that Democrats are the bad guys, obvious that's the party of evil and now the two standards of justice have never been more clear and present either And so some people are emerging now

1:46:55 I don't want to say the victims of this, but that's just the truth. Steve Bannon is a victim of the corrupt Democrat Party. Steve Bannon is a victim of the two-tiered hierarchy of justice now in this country and there was a powerful interview over the weekend with Steve Bannon and Alex Jones. Steve Bannon tells Alex Jones he's one of the greatest political thinkers since founding fathers One of the greatest since the revolutionary generation, a very powerful interview. Bannon and Jones And then over the weekend you had Glenn Greenwald here in Austin Texas who did an interview with Alex as well at the premiere of Alex's war which let me just say this Alex not able to be on air today Not sure when he will be back on air or quite frankly if I'm not trying to be doomsayer here but I'm just telling ya what's up So

1:47:49 Alex's War premiered this weekend. It was Saturday here in Austin, Texas and I just want to say something here. I'm speaking for myself and I'll go ahead and speak for Alex. I never do that but i will right now We just want to thank everybody that came out, and there were so many influential great people that came out. Thank you guys so much! Uh we had such an incredible time, we met so many great people shaking hands taking pictures everything it's just I wish... ...we could have really like live streamed and televised the whole thing because if you could see the love behind Alex Jones and the love behind this movement, and the friendliness. And the smiles and the patriotism everything it's it's the exact opposite of everything they want to represent us but It really was a great event Thank you to Alex Lee Moyer for such a great documentary Thanks to Play Nice Productions as well thanks everybody who came out promoted in our sharing it But here is what it is as Rand Paul says there's going to come a day There's going to come a day of reckoning

CHAPTER 26 / 41 Discussion

Rand Paul on Left-Wing Violence and the Day of Reckoning

Senator Rand Paul discusses the rise of left-wing violence and the lack of prosecution for rioters from the summer of 2020. Paul highlights the disparity between the treatment of non-violent January 6th defendants and those who have attacked him or attempted assassinations. He predicts a "day of reckoning" where voters in cities like New York will choose "law and order" candidates like Lee Zeldin to combat rising crime.

rand paul· left-wing violence· lee zeldin· law and order· january 6th

1:48:51 where people will rise up. It's gonna be peaceful, it's gonna be legal, it's gonna be lawful but its going to save this country and its gonna save the planet Here is Rand Paul saying just that on Fox News this weekend Alright tonight yet another example of left wing violence The same radical group offering bounties for the locations of any conservative Supreme Court Justice They're now attempting shut down the congressional baseball game according to this group no Republican deserves peace ever again Senator Rand Paul, no stranger himself to violent agitators has been attacked at least twice including one instance right after the RNC convention when it's the senator and his wife surrounded by far-left lunatics and rioters. He barely got out of there with his life

1:49:36 And of course the incident with the neighbor. Here now is Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, you know senator I know Washington DC is not far off from New York in terms of their lack of willingness to prosecute people that are violent at least in Kentucky The guy that attacked you as I understand it paid a price right? Ultimately, initially a Clinton judge gave him one month which is what you might get for shoplifting. Came back later and another Democrat appointed judge but more fair-minded Democratic appointed judge gave me another eight months so he got nine months but we still have our major newspapers both the Louisville Courier and the Lexington Herald writing op eds saying that it was justified

1:50:21 The attack on me was justified and that I deserved it because somehow a provocative person. That my interviewing and my style of interviewing Fauci is provocative, therefore I deserve violence." They're still saying that in the newspaper! One of our newspapers employed a young man who tried to assassinate the mayoral candidate of Louisville He got two days in prison and he was released. The Black Lives Matter bailed him out after two days, and he worked for the Louisville Courier. We now have a new writer for the Louisville Courier who's been arrested for violent assault, and now he is writing that the violence against me was justified

1:51:01 But he's previously been convicted of assault also. So yeah, the left wing is egging this on and if we want it to end we've got a lot people up the violent people need to be put away for as long as we can put them away It seems like okay in real time I was on the radio on January 6th. I condemned what was happening? I condemned it that night on this show And yet in the summer of 2020, your Democratic colleagues were either completely silent because it was their base that was involved in the looting and the rioting and the arson. The attacks on police thousands of cops injured dozens dead billions in property damage 574 riots very few prosecutions In this case even though we have a wealth of evidence

1:51:47 Where are the Democrats that are lecturing us on the need for safety and security? On the one riot, why aren't they speaking out against the 574 other riots. Where's that committee think about them Think about this, a woman in her 60s who's getting cancer treatment wanders into the Capitol during all of this. Wanders out doesn't harm anybody is not involved with violence and she gets longer in prison than the people trying to assassinate a candidate get or it just amazing what we're doing and who we're letting off with this but ultimately there's going to come a day of reckoning where

1:52:26 the people who live in New York City. Crime disproportionately affects those in poorer neighborhoods and those who are minorities, one day they're going to rise up and say we've had enough the Democrats are not protecting our children kids are dying at the bus stop kids are dying on the subway, that Democrats don't care about your kids and it continues to happen decade after decade. There's gonna be a day that people are gonna wake up and say we've had enough we're gonna vote for law and order and Lee Zeldin is the law-and-order candidate so I think there is a chance that people will say I don't care black white whatever I'm not associated with any party I want a stop to the crime and we have to put people in jail. I think that's coming

1:53:07 I think a big pushback is coming on a lot of issues, including we need law. We need order. We need safety and security to pursue happiness. Parents want reading writing math science and computers in school they don't want Let's see, whatever political agenda is being rammed down kids' throats. And they also want lower gas prices and elimination of the inflation record high that we have. Not hard. Senator, we're glad you are safe. Thank you for being with us. All right there you have it ladies and gentlemen when we come back Savannah Hernandez in studio to tell her tales of going around the country asking people how they feel about gas prices seeing the drug addiction in the streets that's coming up next

CHAPTER 27 / 41 Discussion

Savannah Hernandez on Border Crisis and Cartel Exploitation

Journalist Savannah Hernandez reports on her experiences at the southern border, describing Border Patrol as an "Uber service" for illegal immigrants under the Biden administration. She details how the cartel exploits migrants and how the "notice to appear" system allows millions to enter the U.S. without oversight. Hernandez notes that many migrants are now arriving with brand-new clothes and cell phones, expecting government-funded housing.

savannah hernandez· southern border· cartel· illegal immigration· national guard

1:53:53 Joined in studio now by Savannah Hernandez been working for truth social Going across the country really covering a wide variety of topics She goes down to the southern border doesn't cut incredible coverage there. She goes out into inner cities and I mean she deals with some of the most deranged crackheads you're ever gonna see on film We'll talk about that she interviews people about gas prices also some strange stuff As far as monkey pox rights or monkey pox protests, this is a whack one. But we'll discuss that but Savannah let's start at the border

1:54:29 You've been covering the border a lot. You've been to Arizona, you've been to Texas... ...you've been to California I think too covering the border issue What are some of things that you've covered that you've seen just being boots on the ground down there talking to either Border Patrol people or illegal immigrants or just local residents? What are some stories that YOU'VE covered that you don't really see getting national attention Of course same thing as always National Guard feels they're very Sorry, give me one moment here with this. Okay so National Guard feels that they're of course just very overwhelmed with everything going on right now at the border I was actually talking to a couple of the members off-the-record and they were telling me what their experiencing with the cartel one National Guard member found this man who

1:55:14 to and just walk over and mass. There's probably five or six border patrol agents there trying to apprehend all of these people what ends up happening is because it's such a large group, sometimes they'll get tired of waiting and they'll just run into the local farmers fields therefore destroying their crop ruining their property so this is what Americans at the border experiencing every single day but it's not even

1:56:14 And really, they're not even apprehending them. They go to Border Patrol. Border Patrol under Biden is now the final piece of the pipeline that is the illegal immigration process. It's not that they're not apprehending and they're sending back. They run to border patrol because border patrol processes them to get them to their final location somewhere in the US. Yeah exactly. And Border Patrol too was telling us how they basically feel like Uber for illegal immigrants at this point and they don't get paid. Yeah, they're extremely upset because they're like you know what we are basically just an Uber service. A lot of these migrants come over and they are extremely entitled with their mentality of like okay I just walked a long journey across the border or I just walked through multiple countries... I was promised money in housing! Give me my money in housing! You need to come pick me up process me take me into America And we have to keep in mind too that a lot of these migrants are getting notice to appear

1:57:02 Because people will look at my reporting and say, look Sav it looks like you're reporting that Border Patrol is apprehending these people and just letting them go in America. And I'm like well what they're doing is they're giving them a notice to appear so they're basically saying okay we're going allow you stay here in the States make sure you come to this court date so we can work out your immigration status of course many of those people the majority of those people not um...you know going to uh...those noticed who appear court dates I forget what the rate was when i was down there a year ago we were talking to some insiders that told me the rate is like 15 percent. I think that show up for their court cases on these deals very small percentage and also we saw the new DHS numbers come out about gotaways right because we're seeing the apprehension numbers, we're reaching historic rates under Joe Biden's administration but what about the gataways? The people who didn't get apprehended and keep in mind

1:57:50 The reason why these people don't want to be apprehended is because they're human smugglers, drug traffickers. They're members of the cartel. You know we just arrested Border Patrol just arrested not one but two sex offenders one of them a child sex offender just the other week because those who are not trying to be apprehended or the worst of the worst coming over so in the fiscal year of 2021 to now We've had almost 1 million it's a little bit over 900 thousand in the fiscal year 2021 It was a little bit over 380 thousand From October of 21 to now, to this point we've seen I believe like 600,000 it's doubled or tripled since last year. So- The numbers are out of control I mean really we don't even know the numbers. They tell us we've had two and a half million illegal entries just this year alone but who really knows the numbers? And what's amazing here so what I was told a year ago and I don't know if this is still the case under Trump they used to have some sort of policy to try to keep track of these people where they would have the ankle monitors right?

1:58:51 Now, obviously they don't have 2.5 million or 3 million or 5 million or 10 million ankle monitors or however many they would need so when Biden reopened the border and the numbers started to influx they canceled the ankle monitor policy to make sure people would show up for their court dates and then they only applied it too if you came into the country and you were on a terror watch list or a criminal sex offender list or one of these violent criminal lists They would still let you in! You'd still say, okay come in but we have to put an ankle monitor on you. By the way half of them just cut it off and then they're just gone so it doesn't even make a difference but oh they'll let you in and they'll give you an ankle monitor

CHAPTER 28 / 41 Discussion

Demographic Changes and the Language Barrier in Texas

Savannah Hernandez observes a rapid demographic shift in cities like Dallas, where she encountered a language barrier with newly arrived Venezuelan and Cuban migrants. She describes how NGOs provide bus and plane tickets to send migrants to cities like New York. An anecdote is shared about an illegal immigrant wandering near a police station for three days because he was promised "free stuff" that never materialized.

dallas· demographic change· venezuelans· cubans· ngo

1:59:33 Most of them still don't show up. They just cut it off there in the country, they're good to go. Terror watch list, rapists, pedophiles they all get in Well we have to be progressive and inclusive you have to remember that right? So maybe your a child rapist Maybe your involved with some human smuggling some drug trafficking Yeah we need more diversity Exactly I mean look at what's happening right now in Los Angeles with their district attorneys not allowing prosecutors to come these court dates, right? When these rapists are out on parole. They're now barring these prosecutors from coming because we have a society now that is pro-crime and I guess anti justice. That's why we're seeing this every single day and it really is heartbreaking to go down to the border and watch these people pour over in mass because I will be very honest with you many of them are morbidly obese they're wearing brand new clothes oh yeah

2:00:19 New cell phones too? They go straight to the bar to celebrate. I mean, I've seen it and again too i've talked about the rapidly changing demographic in America you know? I go out and do a lot of man on the street reports that's usually what I do um...the most and up in Dallas for the first time I ran into a language barrier because I'm running into Cubans Venezuelans that don't speak English who have just crossed over to the border they've just gotten to whichever city the NGO gave them a bus ticket or plane ticket to A lot of them heading to New York actually

2:01:05 I went into Piedras Negras, Mexico because I wanted to go ask these people hey exactly which state are you going to and why? And they're telling me how many of their friends are already over here. Which states they're living in how many of their family members are heading over as well and which states they're going too. Yeah tell us what's next. What States do you hear the most where they're going New York, surprisingly. And it's funny because I actually went straight from the border in Texas to New York and I could see in live time the huge demographic change you're seeing the illegal immigrants all over a lot of times my friends would be like come on sad You can't tell that person is illegal and it's like no I can I can tell they don't speak English until they just got over here. You can tell by their brand new clothes. You can tell by the fact that they are flooding our airports right now and they all have Of course The documentation That they received from these NGOs

2:01:49 So again, you know I come up here and this is a very repetitive thing. This is nothing new that I'm talking about but more importantly it's like if this continues to go on for another two years where will our country be? open change, what's it gonna look like in two years? I remember...I was down at the police station here. It was probably like two year ago maybe less and I was down there filing a report or something and there was a gentleman outside middle-aged gentleman who looked really in trouble And he was out there and I'm walking in and he kind of comes up to me kinda aggressively didn't touch me but kinda comes up to me like I couldn't really understand what he was saying He needed help or whatever You know He couldn't speak English, he looked really desperate Really out of his sorts

2:02:30 And I walked into the police station and before I was filing a charge or whatever, I said hey you guys know there's a gentleman outside. He looks like he is in real trouble do you know what is going on? They just said oh yeah, he has been out here for three days, he's an illegal immigrant, he keeps asking us for rides asking us for money they just tell him to go back out so they come in and they have nothing! They don't know what to do! They were told that they are gonna have all this free stuff And they just show up and then they just wander the streets of the US and expect people to pay their way. Exactly, they're being exploited by the cartels and it's very sad to see what is allowed with our open borders policy so thanks great job Joe Biden.

CHAPTER 29 / 41 Discussion

Political Propagandizing of Migrants

Migrants entering the U.S. are reportedly being propagandized to view Joe Biden as a "nice man" providing them with opportunities, which may influence future voting patterns. Savannah Hernandez challenges the idea that all migrants fleeing socialism will vote Republican, noting that many associate the Democratic Party with the "free stuff" they receive upon arrival. The involvement of Catholic Church groups in the migration pipeline is also discussed.

joe biden· socialism· catholic church· voting patterns· refugees

2:03:16 And a biscuit, but oh hey put on the Biden shirts look they love by then. Look how great buying is no It's an illegal immigrant invasion to collapse our economy Savannah Hernandez in studio with us from truth social does great work out on the streets and and you actually wanted to correct me on an issue because I was saying They showed the picture of all the people in the Biden shirts, and I'm saying that's just a photo op Most these people don't know Joe Biden from a biscuit It's kind of like how same struggle Joe Biden as he doesn't know himself from a biscuit either But all jokes aside. You were saying that's not totally the case that they're actually getting propagandized before they get to the border Yes, so I've talked to a lot of people in the right wing specifically about my reporting and they'll say well let's bring over the Cubans and the Venezuelans because they're fleeing a communistic or socialistic state. They understand true oppression... Yeah like we have refugees side- We have refugees and we have asylum seekers yeah

2:04:08 Yeah, exactly. So I talked to my friends about this and I'm like well this is actually a really interesting angle here and i want to go talk to the people coming over here because you know right now we're seeing all of these oh Hispanics are fleeing the democratic vote and it's because of course Hispanics are very primarily Catholic they're very family oriented they're very pro-life uh very religious so of course the Democrats stand for everything that they hate and despise So I'm talking to these immigrants and I'm like, you know what do you think about Joe Biden? And a lot of them view him as this nice man who's giving them an opportunity for a better life. Giving them the opportunity to work that he opened the borders for them. And so uh you know i can see the mentality from a lot of people of like okay well these people are fleeing oppression they understand what socialism looks like so they're not going to vote it back in but in reality they're voting for democrats and they're voting for joe biden because

2:04:57 the Democratic Party, as we all know as the nice party that gave them that opportunity. So they're going to give them in turn their vote. The Free Stuff Party and then and then the other level of this too is They have all these church groups involved in this. They have all these Catholic Church groups involved with us so then they come in and go through Catholic Church Group or these groups and think oh this is good it's a Christian-Catholic thing I'm getting involve with too but no It's all cartel run Exactly and it is so funny too because again I went from Eagle Pass to New York So, I'm talking to these migrants who you know were extorted by the cartels, extorted by the Mexican police, dealt with human trafficking drug trafficking Saw people get murdered in a Darien Gap like they deal with all these very horrific things talking about what's going on in their country Their tyrannical government and then I go to New York

CHAPTER 30 / 41 Discussion

Monkeypox Protests and Urban Degeneracy in New York

Savannah Hernandez shares footage from a "deodorant-free" monkeypox protest in New York City, where activists demanded free vaccines. The segment characterizes the monkeypox outbreak as a "degenerate disease" primarily affecting those engaging in promiscuous behavior. An interview with a "sex worker" is highlighted, where the individual expresses anxiety about the impact of the virus on their "work."

monkeypox· new york city· sex workers· degeneracy· vaccine protest

2:05:41 and I'm looking at what Americans are focused in on, and I am in the middle of a deodorant-free monkeypox protest about how that is the greatest thing that's facing our nation right now. It's the monkeypox pandemic! And it's ridiculous to see the disconnect between Americans versus what's actually going on at our border." OK, well we can transition to this now. I've seen some of this footage...I don't know uh.. I think you put a lot of it on BandOutVideo maybe all of it but ah...this is some of the craziest footage that I think you ever gotten there's really no sense of

2:06:19 reality, common sense. I mean this is just total Twilight Zone stuff these people are out here protesting monkeypox or they want free monkey pox vaccine? I didn't even know how to cover it either. Yeah i don't even know. They're protesting monkeypox and they're mad that the government is not providing them with more vaccines for monkeypox which again only affects the gay community and so I talk to a lot of my friends about this and they're like, well it's a little bit hard to talk about monkeypox because we don't want to just straight out come out and say its a degenerate disease that comes from having promiscuous sex and orgies. And so what I love to do with these types of things is let the gay community speak for themselves So that's what I did with this interview Yeah, I don't know if you want to play any of this. If you want a pitch to it but uh... This is some of the wack- This is some of the most wacky stuff The most nonsensical What planet did I wake up on stuff that you've ever seen? Literally like at least some of the stuff You can kind of understand and make sense of where its coming from This is like y-y-your on a different planet now what in the hell is even going on? I dunno if you wanna play some of this footage But it's true! 99% of the monkeypox patients are having

2:07:23 Anal intercourse, that's just a fact. It's an STD essentially They're in orgies and they're upset at the government because after they contract an STD from being in a gay orgy They say that it's because of monkey pox And it's because of the government's response to monkey pox Yeah We can play a little bit of this video Because again listen to this own communities from their mouth themselves how they are contracting monkeypox and how it is spreading So you were just talking about sex work, monkeypox. For the communities who maybe don't understand what monkeypox is can you explain it to us? Yes well monkey pox is an infection I try not say monkey pox so much because that would be racist but um It has like terrible effects and has a lot to do with robbing And it has a lot to do with robbing buying parts That's why it affects people while engaging in sex

2:08:13 It is important to know that for some people sex is not just pleasure, it's also work. Like my community of sex workers. So as a sex worker how has your community been impacted by this pox? Well it has been terribly impacted in the fact that Many of us are very scared, right? And because of that we are making decisions not to work. So are people in the community having a lot less sex would you say because of the fear of monkey pox? Unfortunately a lot of people are choosing not to have sex but for sex workers that's not a choice at times because it depends if you eat or don't

2:08:53 So that creates a whole mental health issue because you are dealing with extreme anxiety while working. Imagine if you're working in a donut place, right? And you have to deal with anxiety of getting something all the time. That's how we're like. So I'm not even going to try and make sense of that instead let's do a logical comparison here. That would be like a drug dealer Let's say that there has been a bunch of, I don't know. Let's say AIDS or something that has been spreading because needles right? And this guy sells heroin and you go up and you say hey! You know there is being a big outbreak of needles spreading AIDS in New York and the drug dealer says yeah as a heroin dealer this is impacting me people aren't doing heroin anymore it really such a tragedy It's a mental health crisis for me because I get anxiety now what if I get AIDS from doing heroin like...I can't live that way

2:09:49 And so I mean, but it's just what's so amazing to me is okay. Yeah you're afraid you're going to get monkey pox because the activity you are doing is causing monkey pox but somehow that society's problem? That's what I wanted to highlight too with this interview Is that our society is so degenerate and we are so far away from God or any foundation of traditional family or decency that these people are out in the streets of New York on a Sunday at 6pm The Yeah, exactly. It's absolutely ridiculous. Vaccines for sex workers? What do they want it for free? Yep pretty much! They're blaming the government for their own bad decisions and I'm like how about you just don't be a degenerate and you don't have sex and then it turns into this whole argument of like well I have to have sex and I took video some of this person speech and she goes

2:10:55 I wish I was at home screwing somebody right now, but I can't because of monkey pox. Because I need the vaccine. Everybody needs this vaccine and the government hates us and they won't give us this vaccine and they're literally using the reasoning as to why they need it. so they can have promiscuous, it's just so degenerate. Like I don't know what to do with this! It honestly is wild because I remember growing up and I went to a Catholic grade school and then a Christian high school and they used to do, they would do fear mongering and they would show you images of STDs and all this stuff to try make sure that you don't have promiscuous sex. You could say it's bad thing good thing, I'm not claiming either but I'm saying oh wow

2:11:33 There's general awareness being raised that STDs are spreading and now we know how they're spreading, so people don't want to get an STD like oh no! And that affects me as a whore. Like what a tragedy And, but I guess they want free stuff. They want respect. They want us to be enraged for them. It's like no that your issue you're going to have to find it out for yourself and again everybody is focused in on monkey pox when our border is wide open. I went to New Yorkers as well and another one of the videos I conducted is what is the craziest thing you've seen as a new yorker? And I did this to highlight how degenerate and how much our cities have degraded to where people are watching uh

CHAPTER 31 / 41 Discussion

Public Drug Use and Urban Decay in New York

The physical state of New York City is described as a "mountain of trash" where public drug use has become normalized. Savannah Hernandez reports seeing crack addicts shooting up near parks where children play, with residents treating it as a standard part of city life. The segment concludes with a warning about the collapse of American cities into degeneracy and filth.

crack addicts· new york city· urban decay· public safety· hot trash

2:12:11 crack addicts rub feces on their face and they're like, that's just a normal day in New York. You see it all the time. One time a guy was selling me crack while he was peeing. It was just a funny thing to see and I'm like does nobody understand that this is not normal? And this is not how we should be living in America? And by the way when they ran these studies in New York, it wasn't just that 90...I think it was 98 or 99% of the monkey pox were homosexual men having anal sex Almost half of them had HIV. So they're running around having multiple sex partners at these orgies being HIV positive! This is too much, it truly is and the best part about New York too Is that they are protesting against monkey pox The dirtiest city I've ever seen in my life Trash, its literally a mountain of trash There was hot trash everywhere Even the New Yorkers were laughing and they were like It's hot trash here, just-it is what it is And I was going up to them and I was like Your city stinks

2:13:06 There's trash everywhere and there's crackheads shooting up. And you know what is so sad too? It really is a reflection of our society because people move to New York because they want that, like they want that degenerate lifestyle, they want that degenerate society. The worst part is there are kids playing at this park 50 feet away and people are shooting up and parents are just like oh this is just New York it's just America! Now the kids are getting monkey pox and its confirmed they had contact with gay men I mean jeez folks Savannah Hernandez, thank you so much. You can find her channel on Bandot Video by the way. Gerald Cilente takes over I'll be back hosting The War Room all the news all this news on my desk that i didn't cover we're covering it all in The War Room in an hour but Gerald Cilente takes over the Alex Jones Show now At this point best case scenario is a few years of hard times for us all and if we don't turn it around soon then it will only get worse

CHAPTER 32 / 41 Discussion

Gerald Celente and the Kingston Peace Rally

Trend forecaster Gerald Celente discusses a recent "Four Corners of Freedom" rally held in Kingston, New York, featuring Judge Andrew Napolitano and Scott Ritter. Celente criticizes the local and national media for a total blackout of the event despite thousands of press releases. He emphasizes the historical significance of Kingston as the site where the New York State Constitution was written.

gerald celente· kingston· andrew napolitano· scott ritter· peace rally

2:14:08 But as bad as things are, we still have time to prepare. And that alone is something to be grateful for. A gravity water filter will provide you with clean healthy water even in the event of your taps getting shut off and having your own food will save you from getting ensnared in government FEMA camps. And if you've already stocked up enough for your own family, you might want to consider stocking up for your neighbors Some of your neighbors might not be prepared for what's coming, but you can help them by having an abundance of storable foods and water filtration. Whoever sows bountifully will also reap bountifully. Stock up now at preparetoday.com. Hey great being on the Alex Jones show! You know we just had a big rally over here this past weekend

2:15:04 up in Kingston, four corners of freedom where the seeds of democracy was sown. Right across the street I almost could probably can't throw a rock and hit it is where they at the county courthouse before it was County Courthouse that's where the Constitution to New York State was written when this was the first capital of New York state before the British burnt it down And it's the third Dutch settlement. There were more pre-revolutionary war stone buildings here than anywhere in America, over 70% of America's constitution comes from the Constitution that was written right there. The Constitution has been destroyed by little freaks clowns playing presidents mayors senators congressmen one freak after another so we had this big rally here we had judge Andrew Napolitano Scott Ritter

2:16:15 Gary Null, Progressive Radio Network. Phil Giraldi, former CIA guy hacked people out in the streets of the huge garden, the Crown Garden couldn't fit them all. We sent out several thousand press releases over the past three weeks ran it on spectrum ads everywhere banned nothing zero coverage

CHAPTER 33 / 41 Discussion

World War III and the Military Industrial Complex

Gerald Celente declares that World War III has begun, citing the billions of dollars in weaponry sent to Ukraine by the U.S. and Germany. He labels the mainstream media as "prestitutes" who promote war for their corporate and government masters. Celente argues that the U.S. is an "accessory to the crime" by fueling the conflict rather than seeking a peaceful resolution.

world war iii· ukraine· russia· weapons· military industrial complex

2:16:57 The local newspaper up here, the Daily Freeman, daily piece of nothing. Front page story about some stupid thing, a little jazz matazza or some stupid thing outside not a peep. Not a peep about peace, nothing! I'm a trend forecaster. I will put my track record up against anybody in the world. I've been at it for 42 years Show me your track record, show me your books. Show me magazines you've been writing about and we can begin the conversation otherwise don't want to hear it World War Three has begun today was announced Germany is sending some 13 tanks howitzers tens of thousands rounds of ammunition last Friday the United States announced they were sending more weapons also another 300 million

2:18:10 Over $60 billion has been spent of our money sent to Ukraine. It's not my country, I'm an American. Prestitutes look it up in Wikipedia. I'm the guy that created the word. The media whores they get paid to put out by their corporate pimps and a government who are masters like a little Jake Tapper Hey, Tapper. How come you don't tap about peace? You only bow down and suck up to war! Hey, little Anderson Cooper the daddy's girl or is it I'm sorry mommy's boy i forget which one

2:19:02 Gloria Vanderbilt, who's my mommy. A Vanderbilt? Oh yeah you think I'd get a job doing anything other than maybe shining shoes if i wasn't a member of the club talking about clubs look at this go fight fat mouth anybody that wants war pick up your garbage and go fight it's not my war i'm an american I honor the founding fathers, no foreign entanglements. We back." Yeah yes yes yes! Had to take my jacket off. Courtney heatwave tropical heat wave temperatures rising da-da-dah dah-dada-lah dah-dah. You know when music used to be music? I don't have air conditioning i hate air conditioning. I got fans but they're too loud so I can't kind of shut them off talking about the war The wars started again I say it over and over again

2:20:07 If I asked you to give me a gun to blow the guy's brains out across the street, your an accessory to the crime. America is an accessory to the crime. We're at war with Russia and not a peep from the prostitutes about peace. You know why? Because these little media whores love wars. There's an article in The New York Times today regarding Alex Jones and they use the word misinformation

CHAPTER 34 / 41 Discussion

Media Misinformation and the Legacy of Iraq

The New York Times is criticized for its coverage of Alex Jones, with Celente pointing out the paper's own history of "misinformation" regarding Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. He references Colin Powell's presentation at the UN as a "colon of crap" that led to over a million deaths. Celente quotes George Washington's farewell address to warn against "habitual hatred" or "habitual fondness" for foreign nations.

new york times· iraq war· weapons of mass destruction· colin powell· george washington

2:20:49 that is shaping today's misinformation economy. Misinformation, huh? Well first of all I find that sexist how dare you call it misinformation! How about Mr Information?! Let's be stupid because the crap that they spewed out in this article This is the newspaper The toilet paper of record You wanna talk about selling misinformation? How about the Mrs. Misinformation that spewed out the disgusting lie that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and they had the proof with the aluminum tubes, but they got from Niger or Nigeria some crap they made up. How about that? How about this information it killed

2:22:04 over a million people in Iraq, according to some of the data. And who's that? Colin Powell! Yep with his little colon of crap because that's what crap goes down the colon at the United Nations A little colon of crap selling the Iraq war and here is the toilet paper record they call themselves The Paper Record There's a toilet paper record because this is only good to wipe crap up with. Talking about misinformation, one after another! Hey we're right next to you here in Kingston why didn't you cover our peace rally? I'll tell ya why Salenti because we're media whores that love wars We're slow life pieces of scum

2:23:04 Quote, you Solenti? Why how dare you. How dare you! Yep never a word for the mainstream about the words of George Washington in his farewell address when he warned that any nation which quote indulges towards another in habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave

2:23:52 He told Americans, observe good faith and justice toward all nation. Cultivate peace and harmony with all. Why you little jerk Salenti quoting George Washington? How dare you! You mean a man that actually fought Unlike mad dog, big mouth Mattis. He wasn't on the firing line as much as I know didn't cross to Delaware for peace. No you were over there invading a foreign nation that was no threat did nothing to us in Iraq and your destroyed Fallowsia you murderous freak

2:24:56 Oh, what's a fallusion? Who cares. To hell with Washington! You know why? By their deeds the mainstream media does not observe good faith and justice to all instead they're one-sided war hawk narratives are making Americans slaves to the military industrial complex indulges

CHAPTER 35 / 41 Discussion

Lloyd Austin and the Raytheon Connection

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin is criticized for his former role on the board of Raytheon, highlighting a conflict of interest in the $858 billion military budget. Celente mocks the "military drag" of ribbons worn by generals and criticizes Nancy Pelosi's potential visit to Taiwan. He argues that the U.S. government is "moving heaven and earth" for Ukraine while the American homeland rots.

lloyd austin· raytheon· defense budget· nancy pelosi· military drag

2:25:38 Nations which indulges towards another in habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. And there's Dwight D Eisenhower, five-star general, Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces two term president warning us and his farewell address on January 17th 1961 that the military industrial complex is robbing the nation of the genius of the scientists, the sweat of the laborers and the future of their children. So this is the same military industrial complex where America's Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin comes from. You can't make this crap up! Former guy that sat on the board of directors of Raytheon, the second largest defense contractor in the world

2:26:58 Yep, you can't make this up. Stay safe, stay safe look at that! You can't do a comic book better than this and it's real, real freaks, real freaks in control and destruction of our lives. And you got last month? You had the Senate Armed Service Committee approved an $858 billion military budget for next year

2:27:39 not 860 million, Salenti 858. I've got to keep the number a little lower as our country's rotting going down the crappish 16 billion sent to this comedian 60 billion bucks of our hard-earned money to a guy that played a comedian in a sitcom and his role was the president of Ukraine and then becomes the president of Ukraine Lloyd Austin from Raytheon now out of Department of Defense said Not a peep about peace from the prostitutes. I'm heartbroken, we gave everything we could this thing cost a lot of money to put on totally peaceful oh look at that yeah a daddy's girl she'd be nobody if daddy wasn't mayor of Baltimore but with a big attitude man well we're mad

2:28:40 Yep, it's one big club and you ain't in it. As George Collins said Nancy Pelosi Oh now she's gonna go to Taiwan huh? Are you gonna fix it over there like your fixed Libya with your murderous war Like you fix Syria with your murderous well look at these guys Look at this guy Yeah General Blob That's it Hey great being on the Alex Jones show And again do everything you can to support InfoWars They have products you could use and they give you news you could use. And they're blackballing everybody, I can't say black ball anymore if i say white balling then I would be racist thing right? I gotta be careful here this country's gone down so terribly

CHAPTER 36 / 41 Discussion

Declining Public Trust in Mainstream Media

A Gallup poll is cited showing that only 16% of U.S. adults have confidence in newspapers and 11% in TV news. Gerald Celente attributes this decline to the media's reliance on fear-mongering and hysteria, particularly regarding the "COVID war" and weather events. He encourages listeners to support independent outlets like InfoWars and his own Trends Journal to find the truth.

gallup poll· trust in media· newspapers· tv news· fear mongering

2:29:34 I have to tell you, the rally yesterday could go to Occupy Peace. Occupypeace.com and you can see the whole show had a hot damn band here what a band real music not this... Real instruments they had to play instruments and everything, great time The people were wonderful packed out in the street all over no problems at all Everything went smooth, people were wonderful. But I'm very very sad as I said we sent out thousands and thousands and thousands of press releases zero zero zero coverage pieces not allowed so there was a Gallup poll that just came out that showed i'm not making it is the band the hot damn band man they were really real cats kittens yeah

2:30:37 Yeah, we put on a... We give the best we can. That's the Crown Garden. This is the back of the garden. You have the stage up there. I mean this is behind the 1750s Franz Rogenhaus. The seeds democracy was sown here and it breaks my heart to see what's happened that's why he bought these buildings because what they represent anyway You got the Gallup poll shows, ready? Just 16% of US adults have respect or confidence in newspapers. You mean a clown paper like the toilet paper record all the news that's fit to print what all oh all the news that's fit to print I'll tell you it's fit to print! I'LL TELL YOU ALL THE NEWS THAT'S FIT TO PRINT!! How dare you think for yourself?! You are not allowed to think for yourself

2:31:37 We will tell you all the news that's fit to print. So, only 16% of the people adults have respect or confidence in newspapers and just 11% in TV news. You know why? They promote fear they sell hysteria how about the COVID war fear and hysteria How about when you got these little clowns

2:32:18 Every time there's a storm or hurricane, they're out there. Ooh! The wind blowing and the water coming over and you see what a phony thing it is? That's what they do. And that's why you need to support InfoWars These people there their team They work hard to give you the best that they can. You also if you want to know what in the world is going on What it means and what's next you want to TransJournal Grand total of $2 a week What is a slice of pizza like about $3.50? When I was kid, by the way, a slice of pizza and soda was 25 cents. There's no inflation it's only temporary now it's transitory and then it became transgender to me my name is Jerome Powell. I'm the head fed and I'll spiel out any crap I want you got to suck it up in swallow it and spit it back out for the media

CHAPTER 37 / 41 Discussion

Blackballing of Dissident Voices and World War Rhetoric

Gerald Celente describes being "blackballed" by mainstream outlets like Oprah and the Today Show after decades of being a regular guest. He criticizes current military and health leaders, including General Mark Milley and Rachel Levine, questioning their competence and mental state. He warns that unless Americans unite for peace, the country will be destroyed by the "madness" of its leaders.

blackballing· oprah· today show· mad dog mattis· rachel levine

2:33:25 Yeah, what do we got inflation now? 9.1% So that's the media they sell fear and hysteria They incite hatred They epitomize disrespect for the founding fathers And men like George Eisenhower Dwight D. Eisenhower Never repeat what they have to say Everybody that wants war with Russia And supports Ukraine You are disloyal to the founding fathers I am not

2:34:04 You are cowards to the founding fathers. I am not, you are a disgrace to what this country was built upon. I am not but I Gerald Cilenti had been blackballed by the media white ball from bunch of no balls media I used to be on Oprah, the Today Show, Good Morning America. Over and over... New York Times used to quote me. Wall Street Journal. One after another. Nope! Celenti you don't play the game the way we want to. We have audiences that we have to bring in. We don't bring you the news. We got different audiences we go for. That's all were interested in. Facts? Screw you with the facts

2:35:07 Comedians, you got a little jerk like this Colbert and his other little crap heads. Kimmel, Vaxhawks, Warhawks and little boys of nothing running and ruining our lives as this country goes down the crapper World War III has begun They're sending out billions and billions of dollars to keep it going

2:35:44 And now you got that smiley Miley guy playing, whatever he is to the arm services with these eyes. I don't know how many drugs they got with eyes like that. The madness got these big guys like that too warning about what's going on with China and how there... And he's in Indonesia warning what are you doing in Indonesia? Come back to America! What are you doing over there?! Oh, you mean the Indonesia that we overthrew one time and killed a guy? Oh that Indonesia. Look at it! Look at this cat's eyes man And he's telling me what to do You're telling ME what to do That's like bringing on Lola The guy playing or woman playing our health head over there Rachel Levin We got these people telling us what to do When you look at their health They're out of their minds I wonder what drugs this guys shot up with

2:36:47 And you'll get a guy that eyes on that guy, Mad Dog Mattis. Perfect name for that cat man! If we don't stop... if we don't unite for peace, we're gonna die from war and I don't wanna die in war. They're selling the same crap they did when I was kid. We don't stop them Vietnamese or Asians is gonna be coming. We don't stop those Russians of Europe is going to taken over by them. Same line yeah? Look at these cats man. We will right back

CHAPTER 38 / 41 Discussion

Public Servants and the Arrogance of Power

The segment criticizes the "arrogance" of government officials who view themselves as masters rather than public servants. Lloyd Austin's goal of "weakening Russia" is rejected as not being a goal of the American people. Former Governor Andrew Cuomo is cited as an example of a leader who arbitrarily decided which businesses were "essential" during lockdowns, treating citizens like "plantation workers."

public servants· lloyd austin· raytheon· andrew cuomo· lockdown

2:37:29 Hey, great being on the Alex Jones show. You know that Alex Jones you should send some of that weight loss to Lloyd Austin man this cat could use it The guy who's playing our defense secretary One of the US goals in Ukraine is to see a weakened Russia he said Diet force Yep X7 diet for us Get it to Lloyd Austin You're gonna probably have to send a couple of cases though. I don't know, it's gonna take awhile. This is the guy that led the Iraq war an illegal war based on lies sat on the board of directors of Raytheon, the second largest defense contractor in the United States saying

2:38:37 One of the US's goals in Ukraine is to see a weakened Russia. Hey, you are not speaking for me with all your little ribbons and your military drag on! That is not a goal of America! I could care less about Russia. I could care less about China. I want a strong America Taiwan, why don't you tell me the story of Taiwan and how it happened? Chiang Kai-shek who? What's a Chiang Kai-shek. Yeah oh you mean the place they call Formosa when I was a kid and how many thousands of years just going back between them And you want me to get Oh it's our duty To bring freedom in democracy Save your garbage and shove it

2:39:38 all along with the other garbage that you've been shoving down your throat. This is what else Lloyd Austin on the board of directors of Raytheon, isn't that a nice word? Technologies. Raytheon war machine! The US... You ready? Is ready to move heaven and earth to help Ukraine win the war against Russia

2:40:15 This, he should be brought up on war crime charges. That is not move heaven and earth! Oh yeah we'll blow the hell out of anybody We'll kill anybody anywhere Bombs away I'm a general I love war A warrior for the Prince of Peace And by the way I am a fighter too and i will fight for my life But I don't bother anyone else I only attack the attacker And nobody's attacking us or threatens him. Yeah, the Prince of Peace whacked up on a cross after he throws the Goldman Sachs gang, the Merrill Lynch mob, the JPMorgan Chase syndicate out at the temple. Money changes? Hey what do you mean we're in charge three days later he's on the cross We have mentally ill

2:41:26 psychopathic, sociopathic people running and ruining our lives. And if we don't stop them we are done. Finito. Finished! Can you imagine this guy? Oh and all of you guys out there playing defense secretary, treasury secretary, this secretary... Get it in your head! You're my secretary! YOU ARE A PUBLIC SERVANT You don't tell me what to do. I pay you to do what we the people tell you to do! Screw you, Solenti! What? Do you think you're living in America? The land of the free? Nah... We're not public servants. YOU'RE a servant! You are non-essential! Heyyyy, I'm Andy Cuomo! We're locking down this cut state! All non-essential businesses, you're out of business

CHAPTER 39 / 41 Discussion

The Minsk Agreement and the Roots of the Ukraine Conflict

Gerald Celente explains the origins of the Ukraine war, citing the 2014 overthrow of Viktor Yanukovych and the subsequent violation of the Minsk Agreement. He argues that Ukraine had been "killing its own people" in the Donbass region for eight years prior to the Russian invasion. Celente asserts that the conflict would have ended months ago if NATO had not continued to send "weapons of death."

minsk agreement· donbass· zelensky· viktor yanukovych· nato

2:42:37 That's how they look at us. Nothing more than plantation workers of Slavelandia, the arrogance of these public servants and by the way when The Clowns there he is a little daddy boy born on Third Basin thought he had home run another good member of the club be nobody if Daddy wasn't Mario and he renamed the Tappan Zee Bridge after his father. The Mario M Cuomo yeah Hey, how about calling it the Luigi Celentano Bridge? That's my real last name by the way. Celentano. They changed it you know they had all this stuff going on when he came to America and Adriano Celentano look him up. It's really they say Celentano but it's Celentano He was the Elvis Presley of Italy yep anyway we got freaks and fools running and ruining our lives And this war is serious

2:43:39 And that we had a major rally with Judge Andrew Napolitano, Scott Ritter, Phil Giraldi, CIA guy. Former CIA guy who quit by the way he quit the CIA is real man because they all knew that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction and so did Scott Ritter and they went after him too to try to rid him out Gary Noe, Progressive Radio Network. Huge, huge millions and millions of followers not a peep from the prostitutes about peace instead they war hawk the US is ready to move heaven and earth to help Ukraine win the war against Russia. Ukraine's not going to win the war against Russia

2:44:39 Russia is controlling over 20% of the country. I'm totally opposed to the war, totally understand why it happened." Wrote about in a magazine, Trends Journal showed you 100 times. Napoleon couldn't beat Russia. Hitler killed 25 million of them. Operation Barbarossa couldn't beat them and they were the first ones to be to Germans Eastern Germany coming in. What makes you think 43,000 Ukrainians I'm gonna, this war would have been over months ago if the United States and NATO didn't keep sending weapons of death to keep blooding the killing fields. And Zelensky? Nope! No peace. No peace. Zelensky says Ukraine unbowed even the occupiers admit we will win he said could you imagine that even the occupiers admitted we will win yep but we will celebrate against all odds

2:45:50 because Ukrainians won't be cowed. Yeah? He also goes on to say, by the way and I'm gonna come back to it later when we get back about how Ukraine was killing all those people in the Donbass region for the last eight years doesn't put it in those words mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind said John F Kennedy War will put an end

CHAPTER 40 / 41 Discussion

George Washington's Warning Against Foreign Entanglements

The "Occupy Peace" movement is framed as an adherence to George Washington's warning against "artificial ties" and "foreign entanglements." Celente advocates for closing overseas bases, bringing troops home to rebuild U.S. infrastructure, and requiring a public vote before entering any war. He contrasts Washington's "enlightened patriotism" with the current administration's commitment to "move heaven and earth" for Ukraine.

george washington· foreign entanglements· occupy peace· isolationism· enlightened patriot

2:49:17 I was talking before about this guy Zelensky, the comedian on a sitcom in Ukraine that became play the president of Ukraine and the sitcom became president. Preserving unity now working together for victory is the most important national task which we will definitely fulfill. This applies to our defense in the war independence goes on to say celebrate

2:49:55 Zelensky reminded citizens that next week Ukrainians will celebrate the day of Ukraine statehood. He goes, celebrate during such a brutal war in the sixth month... You ready? After eight years of war in Donbass we will celebrate. Wait a minute! After eight years of war in Donbass?! You mean the Donbass where you killed over 15 000 Ukrainians that feel like they're Russians in violation of the Minsk agreement, that was put together by Germany and France. That you violated? That this isn't picked up in the media as to why the war started and as Putin said from the beginning, you have to abide by the Minsk Agreement, you violated it admitting an eight year war there. They weren't fighting against you

2:51:10 That area, the Donbass region they pulled away after the United States overthrew the democratically elected government of Viktor Yanukovych in 2014. They voted for him! They didn't want it- they weren't going with you guys You violated that agreement and it's right here Yep Avoid avenues of foreign entanglement In innumerable ways Such attachments are particularly alarming

2:51:49 to the truly enlightened and independent patriot, said George Washington. Oh you mean enlightened and independent patriots like myself who launched Occupy Peace? To close down all the bases overseas bring home the troops secure the homeland nobody coming in anymore we can't take care of our own we take care of our own then we'll welcome him in and put the troops to work rebuilding our third world infrastructure

2:52:29 The WPA project, Work Progress Administration Project of the 21st century is our roads and bridges are collapsing and giving them skills rather than the crap that they're teaching them in the military. Oh oh! And then if you want to go to war let the people vote. You want to take our money to go to Ukraine? Let the people vote. Let the people vote. That's Occupy Peace I honor the founding fathers an enlightened patriot. I write a magazine, I put the facts out there. You ready? Washington. Europe has a set of primary interests in other words they got their own deal which to us have none yet even fighting back and forth for centuries or a very remote relation oh you mean we're not there with NATO back then they could have done it back then any ancient history

2:53:39 There was going on all the time. Hence, she must be engaged in frequent controversies because they're all fighting for their primary interests. The causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Therefore it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties

2:54:19 in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics or the ordinary combinations and collusions of our friendships, or enmities. Language is a little different back then enemies if it's not our business Washington said he warned us no one says this I say set it at the rally I write it, but it's ignored. And instead they're selling hatred." Harmony liberal intercourse with all nations are recommended by policy humanity and interest said Washington But Selinski says Russia will not stop until it gets smashed and our Lloyd Austin said

CHAPTER 41 / 41 Discussion

Final Call to Action and 2000 Mules DVD

The broadcast concludes with a final push for the InfoWars store, specifically the "2000 Mules" documentary and preparedness items. Alex Jones (returning briefly or via recording) expresses surprise that more people haven't purchased the film, which he claims proves the 2020 election was stolen. He urges the audience to keep the show on the air by purchasing historic films and survival food before inflation worsens.

2000 mules· election fraud· dinesh d'souza· infowars store· preparedness

2:55:36 We'll keep giving them weapons to keep smashing them. And the US is ready to move heaven and earth, to help Ukraine win the war against Russia." I'm very very sad. Very sad. I see the future and it's hell on earth if we don't stop this. The COVID war they're ramping that up again. Mass time in Manhattan wherever whatever you want to do people are freaking out monkey pox will get ya

2:56:16 Oh, by the way, Elwin people don't come to New York because of the reason they said this city. I'm a CityCat born in the Bronx New York used to be that hottest place on the planet. People from all over the world wanted to come here." Hey, I wish it was still that way man! Yeah... I wish it was the New York I went to visit with my dad 20 years ago we'd be out on the streets going to shops having burgers at like 3 in the morning- I'm sorry had to chime in because I heard you say that It's really sad but I saw your party The Occupy Peace Party I didn't realize you could boogie like that Well, you know I don't know if it was Jesus Muhammad or Buddha but one of them said you better boogie before the lights go out because tomorrow is 50. That was a helluva jig that uh that you put on display out there i gotta tell ya folks i don't even think i could move like that yeah it's a great time yeah thanks so much Owen thanks for everything all you guys are doing

2:57:12 and please everyone, do what you can to support us. Occupypeace.com Subscribe to the Trends Journal It's only $2 a week, trendsjournal.com And we have to unite for peace and again Support Info Wars A great crew Great people And great hearts PrepareWithAlex.com hyperlinks to preparetoday.com which is run by our great affordable foods distributor The great folks over there and they have all the food in stock, and the water filters, the air filters. And all these other best-selling survival preparedness items many of which are lowest price you're gonna find anywhere but if you find something on there maybe lower at Amazon yeah you want to support The New World Order? The point is almost all of its lowest price you're gonna find it's all very competitive preparetoday.com

2:58:06 It's all there ready to ship now and this is how you beat inflation. You buy food now, as the price goes up you save money I told you this 30 months ago those of you bought food then boy were you smart and it's only gonna go up anyway so even if you waited or didn't do it Now was the time to stop procrastinating prepare today dot com and be smart separately we hold back items for people to sign up for auto ship with the additional 10% off. And they overheld some stuff, so it's coming back in late July they think. Vitamin Mineral Fusion one of our best-selling products high quality vitamins minerals amino acids so tasty so great for children adults you name it put a scoop of it and water and spice tastes amazing

2:58:44 It does so many great things because it's liquid, you absorb a lot more with the pills. Even though they're high quality we found 1100 bottles of that that because of miscalculation with auto ship we had it'll sell out probably today. It's available at m4store.com as well or by calling toll free triple A 253-3139 and despite the fact that will sell out today still twenty five percent off and I'm gonna stop right there now and I'm going to move back your phone calls other than saying this I talked to the National Students of four weeks ago, five weeks ago with what was probably the most important documentary ever proving that they stole the election. And I said, I bet I'll buy 100 thousand DVDs from you because people want to have it in their archive and it's such an historic film. We bought 20 thousand and I think will be reordering every few weeks. We've only sold out half of these. And I'm not mad at the audience. I just think your crazy!

2:59:36 With all the censorship online, what's happening? You need this historic film on your shelf to show friends family neighbors your office, your boss, your employees, your church whoever. And so we have it. We have Coben land three the shot getting in how deadly the shot is both those are discounted together, but everybody needs them info war store dot com and I'll be quite frank i'm surprised more people haven't got it I think you're crazy You're ever on the site any other products to not get this and keeps a show on the air Info war store dot com or triple eight two five three three one three nine