Topic: Sackler Family

Benjamin describes Israel as a "spell machine" and "Hogwarts for wizards," where influence is maintained through concealment and the "permanent victim" narrative. He argues that the current panic among Zionists is due to the public becoming aware of AIPAC and the Sackler family's influence. Jones adds that higher-level globalists like the Rothschilds use Israel as a "detonator" for their broader agendas.

Owen Benjamin and the host discuss a "Great Awakening" or "quickening" where lies are being revealed at an accelerated pace. They touch on the influence of Israel and AIPAC in American foreign policy, with Benjamin describing Israel as a "spell machine" for wizards. They argue that the current visibility of Zionist influence is a sign of panic, as "wizardry" requires concealment to remain effective.

Jackson Hinkle argues that the U.S. should focus on arresting domestic criminals like the Sackler family and corrupt politicians rather than targeting foreign leaders. He characterizes the Venezuelan conflict as a "war for the petrodollar" intended to benefit globalist banking conglomerates. Jones agrees that the lack of indictments for those involved in Russiagate and election fraud is a major issue, but he remains concerned about the economic collapse of the U.S. if the dollar loses its supremacy.

A guest discussion traces the origins of modern medical education to the 1909 Flexner Report, funded by John D. Rockefeller to promote pharmaceutical-based medicine. The segment explores how the medical industry shifted from acute care to chronic disease management, citing the birth control pill and Valium as early examples of long-term medication. The speaker also links the rise of chronic illness to the tobacco industry's acquisition of major food companies like Kraft and Nabisco in the 1980s.

In the 1980s, Big Tobacco companies purchased major food brands and influenced the creation of the food pyramid, leading to a surge in chronic illness. Brigham Bueller shares the story of the Sackler family and the OxyContin crisis, explaining how the FDA allowed a "non-abusive" label on a drug that was ten times more addictive than previous opioids. This history is cited as evidence of a recurring pattern of corporate profit over public safety.

The Sackler family and Purdue Pharma utilized a patent-extension strategy to transition from hydrocodone to the more addictive OxyContin. By lobbying the FDA for a "non-abusive" label, they were able to market the opioid aggressively despite its high potential for habit formation. This predatory activity is cited as a primary driver of the national opioid crisis, resulting in massive profits for the company and widespread mortality among the American public.

The Sackler family has reached a $6 billion settlement that shields them from future personal liability regarding the OxyContin opioid crisis. The segment highlights a double standard where pharmaceutical giants receive legal immunity for products that cause widespread harm, while conservative commentators face intense litigation for their speech.

The discussion turns to the history of the Sackler family and Purdue Pharma as a precedent for the current "biopharmaceutical complex." John Leake cites the book "Empire of Pain" to illustrate how the pharmaceutical industry uses captured FDA officials and medical propaganda to market dangerous drugs like OxyContin. This historical context is used to explain how hospitals and the media are currently suppressing COVID-19 treatments.

The segment reflects on the limitations of political figures like Donald Trump and the ongoing dismantling of American infrastructure under the current administration. A federal court's decision to grant the Sackler family immunity from civil and criminal penalties related to the opioid crisis is highlighted as evidence of a corrupt legal system. Rising gas prices and the collapse of borders are cited as signs of intentional national decline.