Topic: Oxycontin

In the 1980s, Big Tobacco companies purchased major food brands and influenced the creation of the food pyramid, leading to a surge in chronic illness. Brigham Bueller shares the story of the Sackler family and the OxyContin crisis, explaining how the FDA allowed a "non-abusive" label on a drug that was ten times more addictive than previous opioids. This history is cited as evidence of a recurring pattern of corporate profit over public safety.

The Sackler family and Purdue Pharma utilized a patent-extension strategy to transition from hydrocodone to the more addictive OxyContin. By lobbying the FDA for a "non-abusive" label, they were able to market the opioid aggressively despite its high potential for habit formation. This predatory activity is cited as a primary driver of the national opioid crisis, resulting in massive profits for the company and widespread mortality among the American public.

The Sackler family has reached a $6 billion settlement that shields them from future personal liability regarding the OxyContin opioid crisis. The segment highlights a double standard where pharmaceutical giants receive legal immunity for products that cause widespread harm, while conservative commentators face intense litigation for their speech.

Judge Joe Brown and Alex Jones discuss the massive legal judgments against Jones, which Brown compares to the Exxon Valdez and Oxycontin cases. Brown expresses optimism that the judgments will be overturned on appeal, arguing that the trial court violated the Constitution by denying Jones a proper defense. They frame the case as a weaponization of the judiciary against free speech.

The segment compares the $965 million judgment against Alex Jones to much smaller fines paid by Purdue Pharma for the opioid crisis and banking executives for the 2008 financial collapse. Comparisons are also drawn to the OJ Simpson civil trial and the Young Turks' denial of the Armenian genocide. Critics like Marjorie Taylor Greene defend Jones's speech, while others like J.K. Rowling and Jen Psaki call for the end of InfoWars.

The discussion turns to the history of the Sackler family and Purdue Pharma as a precedent for the current "biopharmaceutical complex." John Leake cites the book "Empire of Pain" to illustrate how the pharmaceutical industry uses captured FDA officials and medical propaganda to market dangerous drugs like OxyContin. This historical context is used to explain how hospitals and the media are currently suppressing COVID-19 treatments.

Claims are made regarding the unethical treatment of premature infants and the historical use of ventilators. The segment alleges that the medical system has been involved in organ harvesting and criticizes the FDA for approving opioids like Oxycontin for children. These past actions are used to cast doubt on the current safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.

Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock is criticized for her past role in authorizing OxyContin and fentanyl. The segment also recalls the Bayer pharmaceutical scandal where the company knowingly shipped HIV-contaminated blood products globally. These historical examples are used to question the safety and liability protections granted to current COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers.

Two top regulators at the FDA reportedly resigned over disagreements regarding the authorization of booster shots and vaccinations for children under 16. Dr. McCullough characterizes the lack of safety data review as agency malfeasance and a failure to safeguard the public. Comparisons are drawn between current pharmaceutical approvals and the previous regulatory handling of OxyContin and Fentanyl.

The segment reflects on the limitations of political figures like Donald Trump and the ongoing dismantling of American infrastructure under the current administration. A federal court's decision to grant the Sackler family immunity from civil and criminal penalties related to the opioid crisis is highlighted as evidence of a corrupt legal system. Rising gas prices and the collapse of borders are cited as signs of intentional national decline.

Detailed reports from Bloomberg and Endpoint News confirm the exit of Marion Gruber and Phil Krause from the FDA due to the White House bypassing regulatory reviews. Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock is criticized for her past role in approving Oxycontin and Fentanyl. The administration's plan to make boosters available by September 20th is presented as a violation of statutory FDA authority.

The host reiterates the significance of the FDA resignations, focusing on the role of Janet Woodcock in the opioid crisis and her current push for child vaccinations. The segment frames the White House's actions as a criminal bypass of the legal regulatory framework to satisfy UN and corporate interests.

A video report details Pfizer's history of criminal fines, including a $2.3 billion settlement and a failed drug trial in Nigeria that killed eleven children. Alex Jones highlights the role of acting FDA head Janet Woodcock, who previously oversaw the approval of OxyContin and Fentanyl, in granting full approval to the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.

Robert Barnes discusses the historical links between the FDA and eugenics movements, noting that past commissioners had ties to population control organizations. The current medical system is accused of practicing segregation by denying organ transplants and emergency surgeries to the unvaccinated. This "new form of fascism" is described as a century-old agenda rebranded for the modern era.

The host argues that the FDA's official approval of vaccines is a fraudulent move to facilitate mandates, following a script laid out in globalist "Lockstep" documents. Janet Woodcock's leadership at the FDA is criticized due to her history of approving OxyContin and Fentanyl, which the host links to a deliberate plan to addict and kill millions. Pfizer is characterized as a criminal organization with a long history of illegal experimental testing.

Alex Jones discusses the relationship between GOP pollster Frank Luntz and House Leader Kevin McCarthy. He criticizes Luntz's past work for Big Pharma, specifically regarding the marketing of OxyContin. The segment includes personal asides about Luntz's home decor and his influence on Republican leadership.