Tuesday, 15 February 2022

Russia Withdraws Troops From Ukrainian Border as NATO Continues to Declare Full-Scale War Is Imminent - FULL SHOW 2/15/22

Canada enters a state of financial martial law while Western media ignores Russian de-escalation in favor of imminent war narratives and domestic surveillance revelations.

By The Alex Jones Show | 3h listen | 33 chapters
Russia Withdraws Troops From Ukrainian Border as NATO Continues to Declare Full-Scale War Is Imminent - FULL SHOW 2/15/22 cover

About this episode

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau officially invoked the Emergencies Act to dismantle the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa, granting the Canadian government unprecedented power to freeze bank accounts and digital assets without court orders. This suspension of normal law allows private corporations to act as federal agents, targeting protesters at the Ambassador Bridge and across the country. While Trudeau maintains the military will not be deployed, the move is being characterized as the implementation of a global social credit system and financial martial law.

In Eastern Ukraine, Russia announced the withdrawal of military forces following the completion of scheduled drills, though NATO and Western media outlets continue to claim a full-scale invasion is imminent. Independent journalist Patrick Lancaster reports from Donetsk that local populations fear high-tech Western weapons and Ukrainian aggression more than Russian movements. Meanwhile, the Durham investigation reveals that the Hillary Clinton campaign and the security state allegedly spied on Donald Trump at Trump Tower and the White House. In the United States, gun manufacturer Remington reached a $73 million settlement with Sandy Hook families, a legal development that attorney Norm Pattis warns eviscerates the standard of proximate cause to bypass the Second Amendment.

Judge Andrew Napolitano joins the program to discuss his vindication regarding Obama-era spying claims and the violation of Nuremberg Protocols through vaccine mandates. Dr. Roger Hodgkinson details allegations of state-sanctioned murder in hospitals, while the father of Grace Schara recounts the harrowing death of his daughter under restrictive hospital protocols. The broadcast concludes with a warning from John Bowne regarding China’s human rights abuses and the acceleration of the Agenda 2030 New World Order.


CHAPTER 01 / 33 Discussion

John Bowne Report, China Human Rights Abuses and Agenda 2030

John Bowne reports on human rights violations in China, including the imprisonment of two million Uyghurs in forced labor camps and the harvesting of organs from prisoners of conscience. The report criticizes the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing as a distraction from mass genocide and forced sterilizations. It further links these actions to a broader New World Order plan known as Agenda 2030, aimed at toppling Western civilization.

china· uyghurs· organ harvesting· agenda 2030· beijing olympics

00:00 Emergency Tuesday broadcast Russia withdraws troops from Ukraine border as NATO continues to declare full-scale war is imminent. Meanwhile in Canada Trudeau has declared a national emergency in financial martial law and is awakening the world to the threat of the global social credit score police state. Also, Alex Jones breaks down exclusive intel on the Durham case and how it shows the deep state has overthrown the US government. And that's why these people are so arrogant. They believe they are invincible like all other tyrants throughout history. But the US background says they will not win in the end. And if history repeats itself, they're going to be going to prison.

00:53 I just want them to stop their criminal takeover using behavioral psychology and economic warfare. From the front lines of the information war, it's Alex Jones. InfoWars, the most banned network in the world. The 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing will one day be written in the history books as they parade celebrating the point at which the United States lost its ability to perceive reality and embrace the impending doom brought on by the selling out of its most powerful assets by a self-serving treasonous elite class of baby boomer, politicians and economic prostitutes. I would say to our athletes

01:57 You're there to compete. Do not risk incurring the anger of the Chinese government because they are ruthless. I know there is a temptation on the part of some to speak out while they are there. I respect that, but I also worry about what the Chinese government might do. to their reputations, to their families. And nobody cares about what's happening to the Uyghurs, okay? You bring it up because you really care and I think that's nice that you care. The rest of us don't care. I'm just telling you a very hard... Wait, you're saying you personally don't care? I'm telling you a very hard, ugly truth, okay? Of all the things that I care about, yes, it is below my line. The irony of statements like these is that the very CCP tyranny they either ignore or bow down to is already in the United States.

02:46 as those rightfully exercising their First Amendment still await the communist-style circus of the January 6th committee. You can't lock up a whole group of people and somehow identify them as terrorists in advance. A terror event on your own people to prevent terrorism, that doesn't make sense. And we won't ignore what our intelligence agency have determined to be the most lethal terrorist threat to the homeland today. White supremacy is terrorism. If you aren't up to speed, China's policy of mass genocide is skyrocketing. After killing a reported 1.2 million Tibetans... The Chinese army continued its progress towards Lhasa in a peaceful march that the Chinese news broadcast to their people. It was with more curiosity than animosity that the Tibetan population

03:41 isolated from the world for centuries, watched the arrival of these strange invaders posing as liberators. And imprisoning two million Uyghurs in the largest network of forced labor detention camps on the face of the earth. These satellite images show the site where Terseny says she was held, sharing a cell with 13 other women with a bucket for a toilet. And she's haunted by one image. Masked men coming down a camp corridor like this one after midnight. There were three men. Not one, but three.

04:18 They did whatever evil their mind could think of, and they didn't spare any part of my body, biting it to the extent that it was disgusting to look at. And imprisoning 5,000 Christians, including 1,000 Christian leaders, not to mention a myriad of horrific human rights abuses against the Chinese people, including forced abortion, sterilization and organ extractions. For over a decade, the People's Republic of China has stood publicly accused of acts of cruelty and wickedness that match the cruelty and wickedness of medieval torturers and executioners.

05:03 It's stated with certainty that in China, forced organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience has been practiced for a substantial period of time. The report underscored that there were extraordinarily short waiting times for organs to be available for transplantation and numerous websites advertised hearts, lungs and kidneys for sale, suggesting an on-demand industry. The Olympics themselves have been a historic ratings disaster, but NBC keeps on pushing their departure from compassion, common sense, and moral courage into the homes of any American gullible enough to sit transfixed by the brutal spectacle that is less than a decade away from having a hand in toppling Western civilization under the New World Order plan known as Agenda 2030. John Bowne reporting.

CHAPTER 02 / 33 Discussion

Justin Trudeau Invokes Emergencies Act against Freedom Convoy

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau officially invokes the Emergencies Act to address blockades and occupations across Canada, specifically targeting the Freedom Convoy in Ottawa and at the Ambassador Bridge. The measures allow the government to freeze financial accounts without court orders and compel essential services like towing. Trudeau maintains that the act will not involve the military or override the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

justin trudeau· emergencies act· canada· freedom convoy· blockades

06:02 After discussing with Cabinet and caucus, after consultation with premiers from all provinces and territories, after speaking with opposition leaders, the federal government has invoked the Emergencies Act to supplement provincial and territorial capacity to address the blockades and occupations. I want to be very clear. The scope of these measures will be time-limited, geographically targeted, as well as reasonable and proportionate to the threats they are meant to address. The Emergencies Act will be used to strengthen and support law enforcement agencies at all levels across the country. This is about keeping Canadians safe, protecting people's jobs,

07:04 and restoring confidence in our institutions. Here's how the measures we're taking today will help get the situation under control. The police will be given more tools to restore order in places where public assemblies can constitute illegal and dangerous activities, such as blockades and occupations, as seen in Ottawa, the Ambassador Bridge and elsewhere. These tools include strengthening their ability to impose fines or imprisonment. The government will designate, secure and protect places and infrastructure that are critical to our economy and people's jobs, including border crossings and airports. We cannot and will not allow illegal and dangerous activities to continue.

08:00 The Emergencies Act will also allow the government to make sure essential services are rendered, for example, in order to tow vehicles blocking roads. In addition, financial institutions will be authorized or directed to render essential services to help address the situation, including by regulating and prohibiting the use of property to fund or support illegal blockades. And finally, will enable the RCMP to enforce municipal bylaws and provincial offences where required. This is what the Emergencies Act does. Let me be equally clear about what it does not do. We're not using the Emergencies Act to call in the military.

08:54 We're not suspending fundamental rights or overriding the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. We are not limiting people's freedom of speech. We are not limiting freedom of peaceful assembly. We are not preventing people from exercising their right to protest legally. We are reinforcing the principles, values and institutions that keep all Canadians free. Trudeau is delivering on Klaus Schwab's stated goal to use worldwide lockdowns to trigger peasant revolts.

CHAPTER 03 / 33 Discussion

Global Social Credit Score, Financial Martial Law in Canada

The invocation of the Emergencies Act is characterized as the beginning of a global social credit score system and financial martial law. Claims are made that Justin Trudeau is following a plan by Klaus Schwab to use lockdowns to trigger revolts as a pretext for permanent surveillance. There is a warning that "nefarious elements" or Antifa may infiltrate peaceful protests to justify a military crackdown.

klaus schwab· social credit score· martial law· debanking· canada

09:52 which could then be used as a pretext to bring in permanent martial law through the private central banks alliance with big tech to surveil and control and censor and debank and de-platform anyone that criticizes the ongoing martial law medical tyranny expansion. And that's where we are on this live Tuesday. February 15th worldwide transmission. We have the ruling class, the mega banks, the most powerful billionaires and families on earth, waging war on civilization, waging war on our very biology, waging war on our very children and our families. We have the incredible news, stack of news right here.

10:46 with major US newspapers parroting the Canadian papers saying that freedom is a bad thing and that the word freedom is racist. Also, major Department of Education organizations are coming out and saying no one should be allowed to say Mr. or Mrs. This is a fundamental attack on the biology of humans. This is a biomedical takeover. We're going to be covering it all here today and anyone signing on to this pretending like you're going to get ahead is a fool. This is a total enslavement system that is unspeakably evil and they just hope the public goes into mass Stockholm syndrome and submits but that's not happening. So we force them to accelerate their program of control and to compact it in over just a few years instead of the next decade and that is going to end up being explosive.

11:45 in so many ways. And you know now that the civil emergency, the martial law, the financial martial law has been announced in the area of Canada that they're going to now trigger the violence as the pretext to use the military physically on the thousands and thousands of men, women, and children, peacefully, happily, cheerfully protesting the biomedical tyranny, announcing ownership of their very bodies.

12:24 Freedom convoy organizers say they notified police of being told nefarious elements plan to discredit the protests. Yes, they'll now have Antifa descend like vampire bats dressed as the Patriots to firebomb and shoot police is what they'll undoubtedly start doing very, very soon. There'll probably be a car bomb as well. It's very easy to predict this. I told you next they would start grabbing the bank accounts of the protesters. Meanwhile, Trudeau, of course, loves promoting violent communist demonstrations around the world. We have a big stack of articles of him defending burning down US cities. There's that stack. Then there's the Durham investigation, the report of at least 25 more indictments set, and the documents put in the federal filings of private security firms hacking into the White House, and of course, before that, into Trump Tower, and then, of course, US intelligence agencies doing it. A classic bureaucratic coup over the nation. And then, of course, the biggest news.

CHAPTER 04 / 33 Discussion

Russia Withdraws Troops from Ukraine Border, Media Skepticism

Russia announces the withdrawal of military forces from the Ukrainian border following the completion of scheduled drills. Despite Vladimir Putin's statement that no invasion is planned, NATO and Western corporate media express skepticism, claiming an attack remains imminent. Outlets like Zero Hedge face criticism and calls for de-platforming for reporting on the Russian troop movements.

russia· ukraine· vladimir putin· nato· zero hedge

13:32 And I didn't just believe this this morning when I got up at 5am and saw that Paul Joseph Watson had written an article which was linked to the national Russian news. I went and looked at local Ukrainian publications and others and indeed the Russians pulled back the vast majority of their military. They always have some there on their border like any nation does and they've ended their drills which they have yearly. and Putin said, I told you I'm not invading, and laughed at everybody. That was fear-mongering. NATO responded by saying, we don't want any military in your country. You can have no military, and you can have no border guards, and I've got the articles saying any military is not allowed. So having military on your own soil of any number is now bad, and it gets worse. The Associated Press and others came out against zero hedge and called for them to be shut down because they linked

14:26 to Paul Joseph Watson's article about it. So you're not even supposed to say that Russia announced they pulled the troops back, which is now being confirmed by regional media. Okay, all right, Russia nuked the United States last night, we're all dead. I'm actually Casper the friendly ghost. Just, I mean, it's the mind control. I have multiple US newspapers and Canadian papers saying, and colleges, It's time to ban the word freedom. If you tuned in, I'm not joking. They're already banning mother and father. Why not? So there you have Bloomberg wants zero head shutdown. And when the corporate media calls for your head to be cut, it is. Unbelievable. So much more too. I mean, we're going to drill into all of this. We are just under global corporate criminal attack or gaslighting everyone. They're trying to start wars everywhere. They've dissolved our borders. They have sold us out to China.

CHAPTER 05 / 33 Discussion

Durham Investigation Bombshells, Hillary Clinton and Deep State

The Durham investigation reportedly reveals that the Hillary Clinton campaign and the "security state" worked to undermine American democracy by spying on Donald Trump. Tulsi Gabbard is quoted describing the power elite as the primary threat to the country. The segment alleges that private security firms and intelligence agencies hacked into Trump Tower and the White House.

john durham· hillary clinton· tulsi gabbard· deep state· spying

15:26 and they're sexualizing our children. My God, this is the new world order. And InfoWars is here and battled only hanging on because of your prayers, your word of mouth and your financial support. So thank you all for keeping us on air. We'll be right back. All right, ladies and gentlemen, thank you again so much for joining us and caring about the broadcast and caring about free speech and caring about our ability to expose this incredibly evil takeover that is happening by these corporate interests that are completely ruthless and who have now become above the law organizations. Now, we have the Declaration of Martial Law and Financial Martial Law in Canada. That's coming up. I'm going to host all four hours today.

16:07 We have the massive Durham bombshells with more information and more reports of imminent indictments and what that really signifies. Tulsi Gabbard said this, the Durham investigation has shown that the biggest threat to our democracy is not some foreign country, but rather the power elite led by the likes of Hillary Clinton and her co-conspirators in the mainstream media and security state who work to undermine our democracy from within. I'm about to talk about Hillary Clinton or persecution of yours truly here in just a moment. And of course the huge news on Russia that I'll cover next segment in detail where they are publicly pulling back the troops. It's in the Ukrainian news. The Ukrainian president said that they're pulling back, but the corporate media here says no it's not true, war is imminent because the West is planning to launch an attack on Russia. Two US senators even said they may nuke Russia first. Deadly, dangerous, insane bravado and chutzpah

17:03 that is taking place there, ladies and gentlemen. So that is coming up next segment as well. But I first wanted to hit something that deals with free speech, not just here, but around the world, because we don't just see a high-tech hack of Genseng Go redirecting and shutting it down yesterday, and the high-tech hackers celebrating that they had shut down free speech, and the little guy It was also a major leak of the thousands of people that had donated to the truckers standing up against the permanent biomedical martial law, forced injection, Nuremberg Code violating war crime. And then again, I have articles I'm going to show you coming up next segment where mainstream newspapers say freedom is bad. Get rid of freedom. Actually say freedom.

17:57 Freedom is a right-wing racist thing. Freedom is a white thing. And this is vicious central banks that own these newspapers putting out this pure poison. We have to recognize these people for what they are and just fully reject them. And that comes home for us really close because I've learned a lot being sued by the Democratic Party law firm that bankrupted Remington and that openly, you know, is basically controlled by Senator Blumenthal and others. I've learned a lot about these guys and how things work in the last four years of them suing me and having the controlled courts engage in the type of tactics that they've been engaged in to be stuck between the law firms, the corporate media, the corrupt courts in a triangulation that is a beta test they admit for all Americans that don't completely submit and turn our children over to the leftist agenda. So this broke this morning.

CHAPTER 07 / 33 Discussion

Justin Trudeau Dictator Compilation, Emergencies Act Powers

A video compilation highlights Justin Trudeau’s past praise for China’s "basic dictatorship" and his recent rhetoric regarding the "unacceptable views" of protesters. The Emergencies Act is shown to broaden anti-money laundering rules to include crowdfunding platforms and digital assets like cryptocurrency. The government now has the power to freeze bank accounts of those supporting illegal blockades without a warrant.

justin trudeau· emergencies act· dictatorship· cryptocurrency· canada

24:16 If you go to the live show headline on the vaunted Infowars.com, hated by tyrants and criminals everywhere, Emergency Tuesday broadcast, Russia withdraws troops from Ukraine border as NATO continues to declare full-scale war is imminent. Meanwhile in Canada, Trudeau has declared a national emergency and financial martial law and is awakening the world to the threat of the global social credit score police state. Also, Alex Jones breaks down exclusive intel on the Durham case and how it shows the deep state has overthrown the U.S. government. And that's why these people are so arrogant. They believe they are invincible like all other tyrants throughout history.

25:07 but the U.S. background says they will not win in the end, and if history repeats itself, they're going to be going to prison. I just want them to stop their criminal takeover using behavioral psychology and economic warfare. Now, I'm going to go over the Declaration of National Emergency and Financial Martial Law. That's not just me saying that. That is major members of Parliament who happen to be liberals in Trudeau's own caucus. and the Civil Liberties Union of Canada says this is just unprecedented North Korea type behavior. And of course, it's going to be expanded onto everyone. What did I tell you was coming next is the global social credit score is that plan. That's what Trudeau admits he wanted. So they put people in an impossible position. They stand up peacefully and say we're not taking in our bodies, your experimental deadly shot that doesn't protect us and makes us sick in many cases, and that you want to track us and control us with. No more medical privacy.

26:12 And his response is to say, I'm calling the military out on you and we're going to take over your bank accounts and so much more. So you saw Bill Maher join the right side of history last week. He said it on Friday. We played it on the Saturday and Sunday shows here that Trudeau has become Hitler. Trudeau is being Hitler-like in his quotes. I want a dictatorship. I don't care if you have rights. We're going to go ahead and take them. You're holding unacceptable views. What are we going to do with all these unvaccinated people taking up space? That's what's going on. So here's a short compilation that we just put together this morning, just a sampling of some of what he said in the past and then his draconian declaration last night. Here it is. The small fringe minority

27:17 of people who are on their way to Ottawa or who are holding unacceptable views that they're expressing. Do not represent the views of Canadians who have been there for each other, who know that following the science and stepping up to protect each other is the best way to continue to ensure our freedoms, our rights, our values as a country. We are not intimidated. by those who hurl insults and abuse at small business workers and steal food from the homeless. We won't give in to those who fly racist flags. We won't cave to those who engage in vandalism or dishonour the memory of our veterans. So to those responsible for this behaviour,

28:12 It needs to stop. The level of admiration I actually have for China, because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime and say we need to go green as fast as we need to start investing in solar. I mean there is a flexibility that I know Stephen Harper must dream about of having a dictatorship that he could do everything he wanted. Regardless of the fact that we are attacking your fundamental rights or limiting your fundamental rights, and the charter says that wrong, we're still going to go ahead and do it. The federal government

28:57 has invoked the Emergencies Act to supplement provincial and territorial capacity to address the blockades and occupations. We are broadening the scope of Canada's anti-money laundering and terrorist financing rules so that they cover crowdfunding platforms and the payment service providers they use. These changes cover all forms of transactions, including digital assets such as cryptocurrencies. I want to be very clear. The scope of these measures will be time-limited, geographically targeted, as well as reasonable and proportionate to the threats they are meant to address.

29:46 The Emergencies Act will be used to strengthen and support law enforcement agencies at all levels across the country. This is about keeping Canadians safe, protecting people's jobs, and restoring confidence in our institutions. As of today, a bank or other financial service provider will be able to immediately freeze or suspend an account without a court order. Justin Trudeau, I mean, I thought he was kind of a cool guy. When I started to read what he said, this is a couple of weeks ago, he was, or maybe this is September, but he was talking about people who are not vaccinated.

CHAPTER 08 / 33 Discussion

Martial Law Definition, Corporate Power in Canada

The suspension of normal law in Canada is defined as an extreme form of martial law where private corporations are granted federal power to bypass checks and balances. The segment argues that the "godless left" and ruthless corporations are working together to prevent people from gathering and sharing unofficial information. The host claims that InfoWars has successfully turned the tide of public awakening despite persecution.

martial law· canada· checks and balances· big tech· globalism

33:34 Victory or death. Infowarsstore.com. America is coming back from the dead. Well, that was an incredibly powerful three and a half minute video that Darren McBrain put together. And he could have made it an hour long of Trudeau making dictator comments and smacking his lips and looking like a satanic jack-o'-lantern. We had Trudeau's brother on last week, and we should probably get him back on sometime in the next few days. Because this declaration of martial law and financial martial law is incredible. By the way, when the normal law is suspended and private corporations are commanded and given federal power, that's one of the most extreme forms of martial law. That is the suspension of the checks and balances for the people. And Trudeau has declared martial law.

34:27 Unbelievable. And I literally have 15, 20 clips. I mean, that are all just them foaming at the mouth and how we're going to send the military in and how we're going to take everything you've got. And we're going to expand this now to anybody else protesting around the country. And then I've got other government ministers saying, this is good. We can't let people gather and talk. They'll hear information that's not official. That's a quote. And you're like, that sounds like Kim Jong-un. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, this is textbook BS. And of course, there's all these fools on the left that think they're going to be protected and be part of this. The immoral, out-of-control, godless left has made its move against humanity, backed by the most ruthless, vicious corporations. Big, ruthless corporations found their minions that would take their 20 pieces of silver. So let me just show you some headlines here. And then later in the next hour, I want to get into Russia, I want to get into the Dermabassation, big, I got exclusive.

35:29 information on that by the way. I mean it's just sometimes I just marvel all the connections we've got. God put us in this place. I get more humble as our influence increases but I mean I know more than most US senators. I'm dialed into basically all the good guys and it's been because I've been on there 28 years. And I've been trained by the position that God put me in, and all glory goes to God. But it is amazing. And it's very, very daunting, and I don't feel worthy. But I do need to tell the listeners that you financing, and your word of mouth, and your prayer, you betting on this operation has changed the damn world for the better in a big way.

36:16 I mean, I'm gonna just be point blank with you and everybody knows this now. It's not something that's exaggerating. Without InfoWars, we'd be in a lot worse shape and we have turned the tide, at least in the awakening. Doesn't mean we're gonna win the war in this phase, but we have turned the tide this broadcast, all of us together, we have done it. And that's recognized by all the who's who's folks, US senators, Joe Rogan, Tucker Carlson, and the list goes on and on. And so I've been persecuted, I've been attacked, you know 10% of the stuff's been done to us folks. And I'm not a victim, I'm not whining here, I'm actually proud of it. And when stuff hurts and stuff's horrible and stuff's embarrassing and stuff's painful, I just go, well you asked for this, you asked God to set you up to fight evil. You asked for it and you got it.

CHAPTER 09 / 33 Discussion

Freedom as a Far-Right Concept, Media Gaslighting

Mainstream media and academic figures are criticized for labeling the concept of "freedom" as a far-right or racist tool. References are made to a George Washington University professor and the CBC suggesting that freedom is a "slippery concept" used by extremists. Additionally, the hack and leak of Freedom Convoy donor names is compared to psychological warfare intended to intimidate citizens.

freedom convoy· far-right· cbc· george washington university· donor leak

37:06 That's exactly what I intend to do. I'm never backing down to these people because now I would have never given up even if we were going to lose because God is testing us and we're eternal. And this is just a battle, not the war. But we in our own lifetimes can see beautiful people of every race, color, and creed coming together and seeing through the most vile, corrupt, oppressive, brainwashing, and satanic lies that this planet has ever seen. Because make no mistake, ladies and gentlemen, we are toe to toe with the fallen one, the old serpent, the devil. So look at these headlines. Look at these headlines. Freedom convoy organizers say they notified police are being told nefarious elements plan to discredit the protest. Exactly. First, they declare the civil emergency, then they declare you terrorist, then they make you the terrorist. Here is the actual declaration of martial law in English and in French. You should go read it for yourself. It's linked on InfoWars.com.

38:04 Trudeau unleashes never before used emergency powers act to counter protesters as US Canada bridge reopens. Martial law, Trudeau government invokes terrorism laws, close quote, to seek bank accounts and crypto of freedom convoy supporters without court order. He is now judge, jury, and executioners, and all of his appointed leftists are free to take any action they wish against you. Remember anybody that flew to DC of a million people trying to fly back out? Some drove, some flew, but hundreds of thousands of the flew. Weren't even at the Capitol. Some people were just in DC on business. They were put on no-fly list just because they were in DC by the air companies, by the

38:54 American Airlines and United Airlines, airlines. That's how fascism and communism works, is all the minions attack you and then they're above the law with the George Soros DAs in control of a thousand cities and over 2,000 towns. Last number is 3,000 jurisdictions under their full control and full command. That's why they're making their move. They got the Justice Department, they got the CIA, they've got almost all the DAs, and baby, they're making their move. Canadian Civil Liberties Association condemns Trudeau for invoking national emergency over trucks. Trudeau's state media labels freedom a far-right concept with links to the CBC and all of you. I mean, I could spend an hour on this article alone with all the links to them saying freedom is far-right and bad. These are quotes and racist and it gets worse. Freedom a slippery concept

39:51 George Washington University professor says freedom is a tool of the far-right and needs to be curtailed. That's right, freedom itself is evil. Didn't know that? Oh, they're definitely the good guys. They say freedom's bad. You know. They got a $75 million judgment on Remington when the guy's mom went and bought the gun totally legally, and he goes and shoots people. And then it's all gun owners' fault, and now it's all gun manufacturers' fault. And now $75 million settlement at the Supreme Court said, yeah, we can shut down your guns. You can go forward with all this crap. And now they want the First Amendment. Now the same group wants me silenced because they want you silenced.

40:39 But now they've halfway given up on that. So they just want to set me up for January 6th in terrorism and put me in jail because they don't want me up here running my mouth about what they're doing. Oh, but look, why Justin Trudeau is supporting protesting farmers in India. India tried to restrict the farmers that didn't want to go on a national ID program. I agree with them. He supported that just so he could look good, but he doesn't support his own people. In fact, he did it under the orders of Klaus Schwab and Biden. It's now coming out. Trudeau's state media though labels freedom a far-right concept. Wow, that's so incredible. Freedom is a slippery concept. George Washington University professor says freedom is a tool of the far-right. I've got other articles, Boston Globe, you name it, saying, yeah, get rid of free speech. Yeah, here's a nice meme. Here's Trudeau up there speaking, announcing martial law. And Xi Jinping says to Putin, bro, you seeing this? And they call us dictators. Hold up. Got to catch another line. Bro, says the dictator of North Korea.

41:46 And then look at these quotes here. I've got the videos of these. Trudeau, Minister of Public Safety. We had to take the very careful and deliberate step of introducing the Emergencies Act due to the part the truckers' expressions of hate. Oh yeah, somebody had a sign of Trudeau with a swastika on Trudeau saying he's a Nazi, you know, like Bill Maher. And so now we need martial law because the Canadians are calling him Hitler and so is Bill Maher. Maybe we need martial law in California because Bill Maher said somebody's like a Nazi. See how it works? Oh, Bill Maher's a Nazi because he called you a Nazi. Oh my gosh, somebody saw a swastika. Like the Daily Mail, Alex Jones wears swastika shoes. What? But see, it's so made up. It's so insane. People think, well, it's got to be true. I mean, who would make that up? On my children may I be struck down in my lightning that I've never worn swastika shoes and it's a total lie. But it doesn't matter. It's how they're superior to you.

42:42 It's how they take the grandchildren of World War II vets that almost died fighting Hitler and they turn you into Hitler while they give awards to people that served Hitler like George Soros because they're evil people. And it just goes on and on and on. Tech companies, banks crack down on anti-mandate convoy supporters. Oh yeah, first they hack into the sites, Leak gives Sin Go, who the people are that gave, so now the government goes, oh look, we just have the names and the corporations without any warrants and the banks to take your money. No judge, no jury, they break into your computer, they commit financial crimes. The Royal Mounted Police, obviously, give the information to the banks to engage in more crime. That's a criminal swarm, just like with the Durham case.

43:31 Names of Canadian truck convoy donors leaked after reporting the hack. You know, when Hitler started firebombing London, the majority of Brits were against war. As soon as they firebombed London, the majority were for war. It's the same thing. You think leaking people's names is going to make them not donate money? You think intimidating everybody is going to make us go away? No, we're not scum like you. We're not cowardly, bootlicking filth like you. That won't have the effect you want on us. Now I need you to energize me with money to fight these people and launch more operations because they fear us because we carry victory with us. The spirit of victory and overcoming. Infowarstar.com. Go there now. Today, ladies and gentlemen, is one of the last days you've got.

CHAPTER 10 / 33 Discussion

Russian Drill Completion, Media Censorship of WikiLeaks

Russia's completion of military drills is contrasted with Western media reports that continue to claim war is imminent. The segment compares current media restrictions to Chris Cuomo’s past claim on CNN that citizens are not allowed to read WikiLeaks. The host argues that reporting Russian de-escalation is being treated as forbidden propaganda by corporate outlets.

russia· ukraine· wikileaks· cnn· paul joseph watson

44:26 We've been able to extend it till Wednesday and then 100% it's going to end and that's 25% off. Last night was the last day they extended it three days. Nobody else since their distributors gets this deal. 25% off on the entire MyPatriotSupply catalog exclusively at preparewithalex.com. That's a subdomain of infowarsstore.com. So follow preparewithalex.com. It takes you right to the special page with the full raft of hundreds and hundreds of different types of great quality food with the best packaging, ready to store, ready to save, ready to ship, ready to eat. Infowarsstore.com. or preparewithalex.com or 888-253-3139 and it will end on Wednesday evening. X3

45:12 It's already halfway sold out. It will stay on sale for another week at 50% off. That's so good for your immune system and everything else, and it funds the InfoWar. And a bunch of other sales in Wednesday as well at InfoWarStore.com. Well, we got good news. The Russians have completed their main drills and have pulled back their main military force from their own border with Ukraine. We have Peter Lancaster, a big internationally known reporter, joining us coming up in the next segment to lay out the latest on that and there are crazy AP articles, Bloomberg articles, you name it, demonizing zero hedge for amongst other things, linking to Paul Joseph Watson, linking to Russian propaganda. So when we report that Russia says they pulled their troops back, we're not allowed to. Just like when Cuomo said on CNN, you're not allowed to read WikiLeaks, only CNN can. Remember that? Remember how bizarre that was? Remember how crazy that was?

CHAPTER 11 / 33 Discussion

Trudeau Dictatorship Compilation Reprise, Financial Freezes

The broadcast replays a compilation of Justin Trudeau discussing the "fringe minority" and the necessity of the Emergencies Act. The footage emphasizes the government's new ability to freeze bank accounts and payment service providers involved in transactions including digital assets. Trudeau is criticized for questioning whether the unvaccinated should be "tolerated" by society.

justin trudeau· emergencies act· financial freeze· canada· science

46:08 And so now if we just report that Russia says they pull back, I mean, I guess if we report Kim Jong-un says the sky's blue, we're not allowed to say it. No, you only report corporate media that tells you we're at war with Russia and the war is imminent. This is so powerful. I'm going to play it one more time. Here's a compilation of Trudeau and all of his tyrannical announcements and behavior. Here it is. We'll be right back with a special guest. The small fringe minority of people who are on their way to Ottawa or who are holding unacceptable views that they're expressing, do not represent the views of Canadians who have been there for each other, who know that following the science and stepping up to protect each other

47:06 is the best way to continue to ensure our freedoms, our rights, our values as a country. We are not intimidated by those who hurl insults and abuse at small business workers and steal food from the homeless. We won't give in to those who fly racist flags. We won't cave to those who engage in vandalism or dishonour the memory of our veterans. So to those responsible for this behaviour, It needs to stop. The level of admiration I actually have for China, because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime and say we need to go green as fast as we need to start investing in solar. I mean there is a flexibility that I know Stephen Harper must dream about of having a dictatorship that he could do everything he wanted.

48:06 Regardless of the fact that we are attacking your fundamental rights or limiting your fundamental rights, and the charter says that wrong, we're still going to go ahead and do it. The federal government has invoked the Emergencies Act to supplement provincial and territorial capacity to address the blockades and occupations. We are broadening the scope of Canada's anti-money laundering and terrorist financing rules so that they cover crowdfunding platforms and the payment service providers they use.

48:48 These changes cover all forms of transactions, including digital assets such as cryptocurrencies. I want to be very clear. The scope of these measures will be time-limited, geographically targeted, as well as reasonable and proportionate to the threats they are meant to address. The Emergencies Act will be used to strengthen and support law enforcement agencies at all levels across the country. This is about keeping Canadians safe, protecting people's jobs, and restoring confidence in our institutions. As of today,

49:34 a bank or other financial service provider will be able to immediately freeze or suspend an account without a court order. Justin Trudeau, I mean, I thought he was kind of a cool guy. But I started to read what he said. This is a couple of weeks ago. He was or maybe this is September, but he was talking about people who are not vaccinated. He said they don't believe in science. They're often misogynistic, often. Well, the globalists want a war. They want to be our puppet masters. They want to be in control. But Russia has pulled its troops.

CHAPTER 12 / 33 Discussion

US Intelligence Failures, Spying on Trump Campaign

The credibility of US intelligence agencies is questioned, citing past claims that Donald Trump and Roger Stone were Russian agents. The segment alleges that these agencies illegally spied on the Trump campaign and the White House, which is characterized as treason punishable by life in prison. Hillary Clinton is accused of working against American interests on behalf of foreign entities.

us intelligence· donald trump· roger stone· hillary clinton· treason

50:11 off of its own border with Ukraine. It does once a year drills, and they said, these are just drills. You're the ones massing troops and weapons in Ukraine to NATO. We heard three weeks ago war was imminent. We heard two weeks ago, a week ago. Then we were told over the weekend it was going to happen on the 16th tomorrow. And then the president of Ukraine came out and said, that's not true. Please, Joe Biden, come here to America. Then he was sarcastic and said, okay, I guess the invasion is the 16th two days ago. Our media ran with that like it was serious. Well, now the Russians have pulled back from their already scheduled drills. And what is the response of the corporate?

50:48 media here in the West, that Putin's not allowed to have any troops anywhere in Russia, the Russians aren't allowed to even have a military, and how dare Russia put itself close to all of the West military bases? Literally, we'll believe Putin's withdrawal when we see it. NATO cautiously declares victory. Oh, it's a victory that they had a military drill and ended it invading Ukraine. So we'll believe Putin's withdrawal when we see it. NATO cautiously declares victory in the battle. Oh, to stop Russia invading Ukraine while Moscow claims it has disgraced the West hours after US intelligence warned troops were in attack positions. The same US intelligence that told us

51:35 that Trump and Alex Jones were Russian agents? I can tell you I'm not. I can tell you Trump isn't. Roger Stone? The same ones that spied illegally on Trump's campaign and then on the White House? That's treason! That's illegal! That's felony! That's punishable by life in a supermax prison! Quite frankly, it's punishable by death under U.S. code. But oh my gosh, then it's Hillary on the payroll of anybody that'll give her money around the world. She doesn't work for the Russians or the Chinese or anybody. She works against America. So that is just absolutely amazing. Peter or Patrick, I said Peter earlier, Patrick Lancaster is our guest and he is a US Navy veteran, independent crowd funded journalist. Over eight years, the Ukraine war, he has made more video reports in anti-Ukraine government, Dinesk, People's Republic, controlled territory than any other Western journalist. He has also covered the American Azerbaijan war.

CHAPTER 13 / 33 Discussion

Interview with Patrick Lancaster, Eastern Ukraine Conflict

Independent journalist and Navy veteran Patrick Lancaster joins the show from Donetsk to discuss the situation in Eastern Ukraine. Lancaster reports that the local population is more afraid of a Ukrainian invasion than a Russian one, noting that Russia has officially announced the end of its drills. He describes the eight-year history of the conflict and the desire of many in the Donbass region to join Russia.

patrick lancaster· donetsk· ukraine· minsk agreements· crimea

52:29 and reaching 8 million people with his reports. He shows what the Western media will not show you. You can find his reports on YouTube and other social media, and that's Patrick Lancaster News Today on Facebook as well. Patrick is only funded by his views, so please check him out today. So Patrick Lancaster, independent journalist in one of the Eastern-controlled areas by Russia. So much to talk about, so much to break down. I know it's evening over there. Thank you so much for coming on. No problem Alex, thanks for having me. So Patrick, where do you want to start here? Is it true that the Russians are pulling back or is that a lie?

53:07 Well, this morning Russia, the Ministry of Defense announced that their exercises were coming to an end as planned and as they said, and released footage of their forces withdrawing from near the Ukraine border. They worded it as their exercises in the southwestern regions of Russia were coming to an end. And this is clearly, they're referring to the forces near the Ukraine border. And as you said, the West is claiming this as something that they caused to happen, even though this was planned. Russia never said there was going to be a invasion, even

53:58 Ukraine denied that Russia was going to be invading, but the Western mainstream media and the Western powers just kept pushing this narrative to the people just to fit their agenda. The people here on the ground in Donetsk were never afraid that there was going to be a Russian invasion. They were more afraid there was going to be a Ukrainian invasion of this territory because that's how the people feel here. In 2014, the locals here in Donetsk and northern breakaway area, the Lugansk People's Republic, voted to break away from Ukraine and then the Ukraine warned

54:41 ensued, which is almost going to the eight-year mark now. So it's just been something that's been being pushed by the Western mainstream media that the big bad Russia was going to invade, when in reality that was never going to happen. Now, I've followed this but not like you have, obviously, right in the middle of it. Explain to people the geographic area why this started and the fact that there's been at least, what, 14,000 people killed in those eastern areas over disputes between Ukraine and Russia in that zone that's historically been Russian. Is that accurate to say? And I've seen the blown up houses and power plants and businesses and mysterious explosions and missile attacks and both sides saying it's the other.

55:26 Well, I've been here basically the entire eight years of this war, and this war started in 2014 after the revolution in Kiev which removed the standing president Yanukovych, which the local population here in Donbass felt was their president and when that president was removed they felt their Ukraine, the Ukraine they loved and was part of was dead and this new zombie Ukraine was put into power. And I was also down in Crimea just after the whole events in Maidan when the Crimean referendum happened and the Western media was portraying that as Russia making

56:14 the population votes to break away from Ukraine when in reality the local population of Crimea was happy to go back to Russia. And following the, when Crimea was part of Russia again, the population here in Donetsk and Lugansk, they had their own referendum to break away from Ukraine with the hopes that Russia was going to take them in to Russia as they did Crimea. No, that didn't quite happen as we all know and there's been eight years of war after this. But after the referendum here in Donetsk and Luhansk, the population made borders, started creating a military and Ukraine

57:00 basically punish them for this. And I have shown thousands of reports where Ukraine has indiscriminately shelled civilian neighborhoods, civilian homes. I have seen this with my own eyes, proven it over and over again of Ukraine shelling civilian areas with no interest on how it affects the civilian population. And I've interviewed so many civilians here that just want to be part of Russia again, and some want to be independent. And today, the State Duma of Russia sent a recommendation and request to the President Vladimir Putin to

57:46 recognize the republics of Dunyat's and Lugansk People's Republic as independent countries. The Russians announced they're withdrawing their drill. They have those, I know I've read every year. Clearly NATO was trying to hype some type of provocation, but now Russia by completely pulling back, it looks like maybe a little bit early in their drills. This is really again discredited the West that's been saying war is imminent for the last three weeks every day. Why do you think NATO was saying this and doing this? What is the point of discrediting themselves over and over again saying a Russian invasion is imminent?

58:33 Well, they almost every year something along these lines happen where the West blames Russia for creating a possible escalation in this conflict. When in reality, Ukraine forces are the ones that do not follow the Minsk agreements, which is supposed to be to help the local population here and bring it into this war. But on a daily basis, weekly basis, Ukraine continues to attack the civilian population and infrastructure of Donbass, the republic. And by the way, that's not debated. We're showing footage you shot and others have shot of just devastated areas. I want to come back and talk about the devastation in eastern Ukraine on the border with Russia and what this Western proxy war has done in the past and where you think they're going in the future.

CHAPTER 14 / 33 Discussion

Vladimir Putin Interview, NATO Expansion and Security Demands

Footage of Vladimir Putin shows him explaining Russia's security demands and opposition to NATO's eastward expansion. Putin compares the situation to Russia placing missiles on the US border with Mexico or Canada, asking how the United States would react to such a threat. He emphasizes that Russia is not deploying missiles near the US, while the US has systems on Russia's "porch."

vladimir putin· nato· security guarantees· missiles· mexico border

59:22 now that Putin has done his drill in case they try to take over those Russian areas. And what you think the West will do now that he's de-escalated. Stay with us. You have said, talked a lot about security guarantees and now we've seen your proposals. You also say you have no intention of invading Ukraine. So will you guarantee unconditionally that you will not invade Ukraine or any other sovereign country? Or does that depend on how negotiations go? And another question, what is it do you think that the West does not understand about Russia or about your intentions? Thank you.

1:00:06 Speaking of the security guarantees and what it will depend upon or if something will depend upon the negotiations, our actions will not depend on the negotiation. They will depend on the unconditional compliance with the Russian security demands today and in historical context. In this sense, we have made it clear that any further NATO movement to the east is unacceptable. There is nothing unclear about this. We are not deploying our missiles over at the borders of the US. No. On the other hand, the US is deploying its missiles close to our home, on the porch of our house. So, are we demanding something excessive? We're simply asking them not to deploy their attack systems over at our home. What is so unusual or peculiar about that?

1:01:01 So, what would the Americans think if we, for example, decided to come to the border between, say, Canada and the United States or Mexico and simply deploy our missiles over there? Well, does... did Mexico and the US never have any territorial disputes? What about California? What about Texas? Did you forget about that? But everything seems to have come down. Nobody remembers those things just like the way they remember about Crimea. We try not to remember. The awakening is incredible that's taking place right now. Patrick Lancaster is an amazing reporter that has literally shot thousands of in the street, in the field films, many of which we've aired here and watched. As soon as I

CHAPTER 15 / 33 Discussion

Patrick Lancaster on Western Proxy War, Civilian Devastation

Patrick Lancaster continues his report, detailing the civilian devastation in Eastern Ukraine caused by what he describes as a Western proxy war. He notes that over 14,000 people have been killed in the region over the last eight years. Lancaster argues that the West is the aggressor, shipping billions in weapons to the border while Russia conducts drills on its own soil.

patrick lancaster· proxy war· donbass· civilian casualties· nato

1:01:56 saw this latest announcement by the Russians that they're gonna end their drills, I knew the media would just say it wasn't true. Because that's what they do, folks. They gaslight us. So Patrick, where do you see this going next? Because clearly Biden's in trouble. Everybody's waking up to him. He's got like a 30% or lower approval rating. And now their whole COVID power grab is falling apart. What are they gonna do? Well, when you lose control, start a war if you're an authoritarian group. Justin Trudeau has declared martial law in Canada. Where do you see the West going now that it's run by these psychotics? And how do you see Russia responding when it's shown incredible restraint to five NATO expansions? I just played part of a Putin interview that I'm gonna air all of in the last 30 minutes of the show today.

1:02:42 where it's all so reasonable and real, not because I'm a Putin follower, but because I've studied all the angles, and I know he's being very real, very straightforward with people, and then our media tell us that he's the second coming of Hitler, but then meanwhile a guy that actually worked for Hitler, George Soros, brags that he helped overthrow Ukraine eight years ago on CNN with Fareed Zakaria. Well, I think there is quite a few different possibilities for the near future here. And it does depend on how the Western powers and Russia will react. I think the next trigger might be the fact that

1:03:28 Right now it's on the books and in Putin's hands whether Russia is going to recognize the republics as independent states and this just happened this afternoon and the German counselor Chancellor Schultz has already stated that this is a mint against the Minsk agreement and Ukraine has also stated that if Russia recognizes the republics as independent states, that it's them totally pulling out of Minsk agreements. And NATO and United States has the possibility to use this against Russia as a provocation to intensify the conflict here. So we're going to have to see how the world powers react.

1:04:18 This is the newest possibility for a political escalation here. Wow, I could ask a hundred questions. I mean, you've done so much amazing work. I feel like I know you. My producer said, hey, we've got this well-known American reporter on. He's going to come on. As soon as I saw your face, then I clicked all the countless videos I've watched in eight years of the stuff you've caught on tape. We should have you on sometime just to send us your best clips of the incredible stuff. People getting blown up, buildings on fire, bombs, artillery coming in, dead civilians. I mean, the combat footage and stuff you've gotten has just been insane. For Americans, and you're a Navy veteran as well, and military people in the US who've not been over there and seen this, how serious is this and how would you describe it?

1:05:10 For many people, they don't even, many people in the West, they don't even realize that this war has been going on in Europe for almost eight years now. And the amounts of people, as you said, over 14,000 people have been killed. I personally think that's probably a low number, but I mean, this has been year after year, a war that has intensified and then it calmed and it just keeps going on this cycle for eight years now. with no real end in sight because it's all controlled by the world powers. The people here in Donetsk and the rest of it, in Donbass, I asked them every time I go and film their homes after they've been destroyed by the Ukrainian forces, what they want. And they just say they want peace. They want peace and to be no longer part of Ukraine. And the main thing most of them want is to become part of Russia.

1:06:08 Absolutely. Again, I have been accused of being a Russian agent. I've never been to Russia. I'd love to go. I'd love to go to Israel. I'd love to go to Egypt. I'd love to go a lot of places I haven't been. I'd love to go to Japan. But being demonized as a Russian agent made me go study Russia more and find out how Russia really is being ganged up on. It's the only country that isn't invited to the Bilderberg Group. And you can say Russia's got its problems. I'm not saying it doesn't have its corruption and things, but literally the whole world is ganged up on Russia. You just can't deny that. Why do you think that's the case or do you disagree with that statement? Yes, the whole Western world has it tends to go against Russia in the east as It could be said that the east also is on the opposite side of the Western world which everyone realizes is the case but as the clip you showed of the president of Russia Vladimir Putin say how would the United States react if

1:07:16 They were putting missiles, like in the Cuban Missile Crisis. How did the United States react when Russia, if Russia would try to encroach on the United States? And this is what Russia is doing. They just don't want NATO to keep pushing and pushing over and over again. And let's let that sink in and we'll do one more segment and let you go wherever you want to go because I think you've got a lot to say. Imagine, 10 billion dollars in weapons, all these foreign mercenaries and troops attacking the Russian border, the Russians do a drill on their border, and the world acts like they're raping babies or something. I mean, this is so obvious that the West is the aggressor here. We'll be right back. Stay there. Patrick Lancaster is our guest. Patrick Lancaster news today. And we're going to come back and just get into how do we stop this? How do we stop the warmongers? And how do we get

1:08:12 peace without giving into the new world order. I mean, what does Russia do? Just sign everything over to Klaus Schwab and to Bill Gates? And ladies and gentlemen, I don't say this to brag because we're in very dark times around the world, but I say it to let you know that even during the breaks, We are reaching tens of millions of people in ways that someday I'll write a book. Long after we win this war or lose this war, one way or another, if it's God's will, you'll learn about some of the inside baseball and the things we've done. But I can just tell you this, you cannot bet on another news organization to do more than InfoWars. I wish other places were as effective as we are. And Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan have basically gotten there. And we're not judging them. We want them to go way past us. But even behind the scenes,

CHAPTER 16 / 33 Discussion

False Flag Allegations, Western Weapons in Ukraine

Patrick Lancaster discusses State Department claims of a Russian false flag, noting that no evidence was provided to support the allegation. He reports seeing evidence of Western-supplied 60mm mortars being used by Ukrainian forces to target civilian infrastructure in Donetsk. Lancaster concludes that the local population is terrified of the high-tech weapons being shipped into the region by NATO.

false flag· state department· javelin missiles· donetsk· patrick lancaster

1:08:59 You just don't know the influence of what we're doing and what we're up to. And that's credit to you for keeping this dog in the fight. This is all of us together, our combined will to carry this out. Patrick Lancaster is an amazing veteran, independent, crowdfunded journalist who's lived for eight years in eastern Ukraine and covered the ongoing globalist proxy war. He's also a U.S. Navy veteran. What got you out there to that area, to Donetsk? What got you to Ukraine and what other points would you like to make to this audience? What really got me interested in pushing the facts that I see with my own eyes here is when I

1:09:47 came to Crimea during the referendum there when Crimea joined Russia because I saw what the Western media was showing and how it was totally different than what I saw with my own eyes there. How the people there just were just so happy, just in tears of being able to join Russia again. Because, I mean, the people that were born before 1956 in Crimea were born in Russia and they were just so happy to go back to their home. And that wasn't what the Western media, mainstream media was showing. So when everything started to calm down in Crimea, I saw the escalation that was happening in Donbass and decided to come here and

1:10:36 try to show the world what was really happening. What I saw with my own eyes here, I don't like to put my opinions at all in my reports. I just show exactly what I see and what the facts are on the ground because the Western mainstream media won't show what goes against their country's narrative. Absolutely. I don't know if you saw this a week and a half ago, but the spokesperson for the State Department from the CIA was there saying that Russia was going to stage a false flag and had a fake video of atrocities by the Ukrainians against the Russians, even though there's ongoing war and people being killed. They were saying, no, none of that exists. It's all fake. The Russians have made a fake video. And the reporter for AP said, well, that's Alex Jones territory you're getting into now. Well, no, when I say there's false flags, which do happen, I have evidence like Jesse Spallett

1:11:32 WMDs in Iraq, Gulf of Tonkin, Operation Northwoods, those are all real things people can look up. But what do you think the West was trying to do claiming Russia is going to be involved in a false flag? Was NATO planning to attack Russians and when Russians attack say, oh, we didn't attack, that's fake? Or did they think Russia might actually stage a false flag? They were pushing their agenda and as the AP reporter asked him, where is the evidence of this so-called false flag that's going to happen? They couldn't produce any evidence because there was no evidence. This was just something that was generated to again discredit Russia and try to

1:12:21 further their agenda of this magical Russian invasion where the big bad Russian wolf is going to hop and puff and blow Ukraine down. And they just kept trying to push that. It's going to be interesting to see what their next line is to push this agenda. What do you think the globalists that control our puppet president here in the US, what do you think they're saying and doing right now that Russia has pulled back from the border and is really letting the West mass all these troops and weapons? So this is really a standout. I don't know if I was the Russian president, if I would pull troops off the border. If people were massing troops on my border, I'd pull back. I get why he's doing it. It's kind of an Obi-Wan Kenobi move.

1:13:02 where he lets Darth Vader get him to show who the bad guy is, or a Martin Luther King-style junior move here. I just hope that the West doesn't get pissed now and launch an attack on Russia as a provocation. What do you think's really gonna happen? There are just so many possibilities and things are changing on a not even daily basis, but just an hourly basis. So much also depends on, like I said, if Putin recognizes the republics as independent countries and what the West decides to do with that information. I can't even comment on what can happen next because everything could change by the time we're done with this show.

1:13:46 What do you think of all the, I'm sure you've seen it, you're super informed, all the videos of the State Department provocatively showing billions in anti-aircraft, anti-tank missiles, javelins, you name it, being shipped in, and the celebrations and the calls for war by the minority of Ukrainians they've obviously whipped into war fury. I mean, as you said, you're living right in a town they've already been attacking. What is it like to know they don't just have smaller mortars and artillery and old-fashioned you know, RPGs now and machine guns. Now they've got class A European, British and U.S. weapons. Well, the local population here is afraid when those weapons are going to start hitting their homes because the people here see this because, as you said, Ukraine is bragging about these weapons arriving. And

1:14:38 These aren't the first Western weapons arising. Less than two weeks ago, I did a report on a civilian electric substation which was targeted by Ukraine forces not far from where I am right now. We found the evidence of 60 millimeter mortars being used, launched from Ukraine territory, no question about it. And these 60 millimeter mortars are not in the arsenal of Ukraine, nor were in the arsenal of the Soviet Union or Russia. These were Western supplied 60 millimeter mortars. They did not come from the East, they came from the West.

1:15:21 And it's not necessarily that they came in these new shipments. They came from shipments before that weren't necessarily told about and publicized. And the people here, they see this and they're just afraid of what's going to happen next. Absolutely. It's just insane. There's no doubt who's pushing the borders of NATO. There's no doubt who's shipping in high tech weapons. There's no doubt who's trying to start a war with Russia and it should concern us all. Patrick Lancaster, thank you so much. Look forward to speaking to you again. Thank you, it'll be great. You know a man by his enemies, that's who we are. As for us, we've not declared bankruptcy and don't plan on it, and we plan to just fight forever, and they're never going to shut us up. In fact, I was quite frankly five years ago planning to phase out and retire within five years. Ain't retiring now, suckers. Gonna be doing nighttime shows and everything else. People come after me, I fight 50 times harder. So now the globalists have declared war on me and my family? Well, we are gonna turn up the heat.

CHAPTER 18 / 33 Discussion

Norm Pattis on Remington Settlement, Proximate Cause

Attorney Norm Pattis explains that the Remington settlement eviscerates the legal notion of "proximate cause" by holding a manufacturer liable for the criminal acts of a third party. He notes that the case relied on the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practice Act regarding "unscrupulous advertising." Pattis argues that the plaintiffs are attempting to legislate through litigation to bypass the Second Amendment.

norm pattis· remington· sandy hook· proximate cause· unfair trade practice act

1:21:38 joins us right now to discuss this. We haven't pre-war game this or talked before. I just called him before I went live and said, you want to come on in a couple hours? He said, sure. And so here he is right now to give his take on all this. Norm, great to have you on with us. Thanks Alex. No, it's a shocking settlement. As reported in, and you know details are hard to come by, the Koskoff firm gave a press conference this morning and that has been widely reported on. As reported in the Wall Street Journal, previously there was an offer to settle the case for I think $32 or $33 million. That represented the policy limit for two of the four insurance companies that were defending or responsible for defending Remington.

1:22:17 Now, all four insurance companies have tendered or offered their policy limits, and that is $73 million. Presumably, that will settle the case for the nine families involved. What I find particularly shocking about this is that it eviscerates, eliminates, erases traditional notions of proximate cause. Usually in a case involving personal injury, you have to show that the acts or omissions of the person you're suing actually caused, legally caused damage to another person. In this case, the plaintiffs are legislating by litigation.

1:22:53 They're deciding what the law should be and they're terrorizing or attempting to terrorize private industry into doing what they think is right. Now, what's the legal background here? Remington was sued under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practice Act, which makes it possible to pursue a company if they engage in immoral or unscrupulous advertising. Because Remington marketed these devices as tools for combat and presumably targeted young men for those, and Adam Lanza had the gun, never mind that his mother bought it. She wasn't the one who was tooled for, targeted for advertising. Therefore, this represented an exception to the federal bar on suits against gun manufacturers.

1:23:38 It was an extremely close case in the Connecticut Supreme Court, decided 4-3. The U.S. Supreme Court decided not to weigh in and the result was the case could advance for trial. But here's what's highly unusual and makes you wonder kind of what's going on. Because the case involving Remington and the Sandy Hook families was set to start trial in September. There's another trial that is set to start in September, and that's the case of the Sandy Hook families versus Free Speech Systems and Alex Jones. So how are those two trials going to take place simultaneously? Well, they were- Let's be clear, the same law firm, the same Democrat law firm?

1:24:18 The same firm, I think some overlapping plaintiffs. I'm not sure about that. I haven't compared the plaintiffs in the case against you to the plaintiffs in Remington. but the same firm was going to be on trial allegedly at the same time against two folks or two groups of defendants demonized regarding... That's right, I mean everybody's got to pay these people. I mean my god they would go back in a time machine and make Jesus pay some money. I mean it's Remington, it's the police are sued, the teachers are sued, they might sue the Easter Bunny next. that well you know you make a facetious point but it involves an important principle and that is the notion of proximate cause but for the fact that we all got out of bed this morning we wouldn't be aware of all the suffering in the world is the fact that we woke up

1:25:06 Does that make us responsible for that suffering? Should somebody pay us for what we viewed? No, that's what's called but-for causation. The world is a string of causation, of events linked to one another when looked back at from a certain perspective in time. But proximate cause says there has to be some limitation on causation. And usually the doctrines that reign in limitations on causation are an identifiable victim, an imminent risk of harm, where it was foreseeable that the person would be, would be harmed. Now, if Remington had had the balls to try that case and put it on in front of a jury, they could have said, look, maybe the advertising was irresponsible, but it's not proximately related to Adam Lenz's decision to go out and wipe out a classroom of first graders and the adults trying to protect them. It was a horrible event.

1:25:54 No one is here to justify or excuse what Mr. Lanza did. But when the Costco firm can say, look, our purpose in bringing this litigation was to send a message to manufacturers, to banks and insurers, you know, don't stand behind these folks. They're trying to do by legislative or by litigation fiat. what the Second Amendment prohibits and what legislation has to do with that. Yeah, let's be clear. They're filing lawsuits in deep blue areas and saying, hey, let's shut down the free speech of conservatives. Let's shut down the rights of all gun owners. It's literally East Coast controlled areas suing to take the Midwesterners guns. I mean this and they brag about this. Norm, you know, I'm just going to say this stuff. I didn't learn this from you, but I'm just going to bring it up right now. They want me to come out against the Second Amendment. Hell will freeze over before I do it.

CHAPTER 19 / 33 Discussion

Politics of Virtue, Social Credit Scores in Litigation

Norm Pattis warns of a "politics of virtue" where litigation is used as a tool for social control and economic warfare. He suggests that large judgments are intended to bankrupt those who do not conform to a specific vision of the public good. Pattis and the host discuss how these legal tactics mirror the social credit systems being implemented through banking and technology.

norm pattis· social credit score· economic warfare· remington· litigation

1:26:40 and they want $500 million. I don't have a million dollars in cash. Okay? So, so it's just insane. They want us off air and it ain't gonna happen. They might be able to come in this building and shut this down, but Mr. Alex Jones is gonna be bigger than ever, which I know they're mad about. I don't know how much of that you know about, Norm, but I learned about that from the folks at GCN. They want $500 million. GCN doesn't have $5 billion. Why don't they say $50 billion? $100 billion? Because it's all about control and shutting down speech, and they just put these big numbers up there to terrorize people, Norm.

1:27:18 It's about optics. I think they will have bragging rights. If they can obtain a large verdict against you, which would result in shutting free speech systems down, they'll say they silenced Alex Jones. But as you pointed out, they'll never silence Alex. to maybe 50 billion to the families and of course the law firm first. Maybe the Democratic Party, now that they own gunshot victims, they own all this, maybe we should all just give all our wealth to them. I mean, because how much money? Is 73 million enough? Is all the other money enough? Is the hundreds of millions they raised off of all their charities enough? I mean, I know we're all collectively guilty for their children dying,

1:28:12 I just want to know what is enough and the answer is nothing. We want your speech, we want your country, we want your self-defense and George Soros runs your DA's, he's going to take your police away. Well Norm Pattis was on fire during the break so I want him to repeat what he just said to me during the break on air about what this vicious blow to the right of self-defense means and now the same organization setting its sights on their own words on the First Amendment. Norm Patus. No, these, you know, these eye-popping numbers aren't about money. They're about control. And if you can be starved into submission, the goal is submission. And so this company was put out of business. They're aiming to put you out of business and to put free speech systems out of business. And they're aiming maybe even

1:29:03 And they harbor the fantasy of taking over the studio and transforming it into the broadcast that they want. But the point is, they're failing to realize that you're responding to a need in the public at large that they can't satisfy. So the info war will continue. It will just move to another forum if they are successful. You know, you've asked me to stay. You just let the cat out of the bag. I mean, they approached GCN and said, let us just take the show over and put our own stuff on or take him off the air. I mean, that's how crazy this is. The left is so entitled with all their elitist power and money. They believe they don't just get to shut us up. They get to move in to who we were. It doesn't work like that.

1:29:41 The single most significant threat to civil liberties, in my view at least, in our lifetime, in the next 10 years, is going to be a struggle over what I call the politics of virtue. And there is a struggle for the levers of control by those who think we know how best to live, both in terms of public health, global security, climate change, with respect to guns, with respect to speech, with respect to speech code, with respect to what we can do. They're aided and assisted by large algorithms that can be programmed to respond to that vision of the good. And we're going to see increasing efforts at social control, which will reach down to the ordinary person in their pocketbook. Your credit card will become a means of depriving you of access to things when the code isn't accepted because your social utility score isn't right. That's from the bottom up.

1:30:32 From the top down, large institutions will be crippled or bankrupt or taken over with large judgments if they can be obtained. So, you know, I don't know what the guys in the executive suite at Remington were thinking, but this is a case that should have been fought and a jury of ordinary people might have reached a different decision as we are hoping they will do in the case against you, Alex. I don't have any doubt that Remington's lawyers will come out swinging and ask for tens if not hundreds of millions in a jury trial and we will ask a jury to follow the law and to use their common sense. It's conclude that if they came for you first, they're coming for these jurors next. And in the end, there's no satisfying a Republican version. But I mean, Norm, listen, I've been in four years of litigation. You've been out here three plus years. You've been in all our books, everything.

1:31:17 I don't have a half million dollars in my personal bank account, which I enjoy. It's so hilarious that I can pop up anywhere and reach all the same systems, be bigger than ever, and they think they're going to get money, and they're not. Because we know, though, they now know that. They don't want money. Like you said, they want to silence us. That was a cherry on top after they shut down our oldest gun manufacturer, Remington, to get that money from their insurance carriers. It was it when and it was a sign of what's to come. I mean, I mean, I'm just shocked by this. I think it's bad for the civil justice system. I think it's going to encourage legislation by litigation. Ambitious plaintiffs, lawyers everywhere are going to try to use the bankruptcy code to enforce their visions of the good. And we will enter into a form of economic warfare disguised as litigation where the rights of the non well-heeled, those without financial backing, are going to be held in jeopardy.

1:32:12 by those who have financial banking and can turn the courts into a tool of extortion. The Remington settlement for all of the opposite character is a nightmare for the civil justice system. It eviscerates traditional notions of legal causation. I totally agree, but here's the good news. Historically bullying with Americans and and let's just say historically Anglo-Saxon ideas and thought does not go too well. Some places intimidation works, it's gonna blow up in their face, it's gonna cause massive resistance. So they bit off more than they can chew. Norm, let's come back and talk about the Sarah Palin case in the New York Times straight ahead.

CHAPTER 20 / 33 Discussion

Sarah Palin v. New York Times, Actual Malice Standard

Norm Pattis analyzes Judge Jed Rakoff’s decision to dismiss Sarah Palin’s libel case against the New York Times while the jury was still deliberating. They discuss the "actual malice" standard established in New York Times v. Sullivan and the emerging double standard between corporate media and citizen bloggers. Pattis argues that the First Amendment is being undermined by penalizing individuals for speaking their minds.

sarah palin· new york times· actual malice· first amendment· norm pattis

1:32:57 Something very rare is going on and it ends in just three days as of the time I'm taping this announcement on Thursday afternoon. Coming up this Monday, the biggest sale in four years of high quality storable foods at preparewithalex.com will end. That's 25% off already the lowest prices you're gonna find on high quality storable food at infowarestore.com. Again, you can go to preparewithalex.com or info or store dot com and it takes you to the same place. 50% off as well on super high quality products like X3, the deep earth crystal iodine. That sale is going on as well. It doesn't end on Monday. It'll end in a few weeks. We're almost sold out of the product. Everybody needs to have storable food to be prepared to become self sufficient now. The best high quality food at the lowest prices at info or store dot com.

1:33:56 Oh, and let me add, Judge Andrew Napolitano is about to be joining us. He was censored. He was suspended and began the end of his career at Fox when he, five years ago, four and a half years ago in 2017 said, hey, they were spying on Trump illegally and specifically gave details from his sources. Now it's all vindicated with the Durham investigation. That's coming up in a few minutes. But getting back to these other legal issues, Norm Patt is a constitutional lawyer. What do you make of the Sarah Palin situation? I like Sarah Palin. I think it's wrong that the New York Times falsely said that she put crosshairs over the head of a congresswoman and others that later got shot, six killed. But I believe in the First Amendment, and we can't prove they lied on purpose.

1:34:46 I really think the New York Times versus Sullivan or Sullivan New York Times should stand. But it seems we're creating a system where the New York Times gets its speech, but Alex Jones doesn't get its speech. There's the Alex Jones exception. So I like Sarah Palin. But at the same time, she was a vice presidential candidate. She's been a big politician. She's in a big, you You know man woman's world and in my experience you get in the arena. You better expect stuff I mean if I sued people every time they lied about me or said, you know, really bad things I'd be in the court all day. That's my view people say why haven't I sued a bunch of people? Well, that's not who I am I sue the January 6th committee with you because that's my private stuff and they don't deserve it and it's a lie But but just in closing. What do you make of the judge while the jury deliberating? Throwing out and saying they didn't have malice of forethought with intent to do harm I mean, how do we know that?

1:35:37 Well, so the judge, you know, all judges have a responsibility to prevent cases from getting to a jury unless there's sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the plaintiff or the government if it's a criminal case. This judge concluded that Ms. Palin had not produced at trial sufficient evidence of malice to permit the case to go to judgment. However, the judge did something very, very significant. He basically took a reservation on that decision and he's letting the jury continue to deliberate. So that if the jury disagrees and says it did, then and the case goes up for appeal, they won't have to retry the case. So it's an unconventional move. The judge is a guy named Ned Rakoff. He's a very bright person. I've seen these sort of reservations taken before. But the larger issue is whether Ms. Palin, whether the New York Times V. Sullivan will survive.

1:36:29 and whether as to public figures, there'll be a finding of actual malice as necessary for a case to get to a jury on defamation. Now, you know, Palin, I guess got lucky that the plaintiffs didn't, you know, move for a default against her. We wanted to raise the same defense in your case. And, you know, as the case evolved, the Koskoff plaintiffs were able to create an image of what your company should look like and persuaded you because it didn't look that way. You weren't complying with discovery and she entered a disciplinary default. We disagree with that ruling and if necessary, we'll take an appeal at the appropriate moment. But, you know, the First Amendment is on the line everywhere.

1:37:13 And, you know, to protect debate, the New York Times versus Sullivan has said of public figures that you have to prove more than that a speaker got something wrong. You have to prove actual malice. Some people say that standard is too high. to have the same standard for everyone. And then over here though, the other side defaults us, we give them all our stuff, they lie and say we didn't give it to them, and then now I'm just guilty, the judge says, and then I've got to be shut down. That is extremely dangerous and that goes with everything else we're seeing where justice is one way for the left and one way for the right.

1:38:06 Well, I think there's a growing tendency to want to protect mainstream media and say of citizen bloggers that we're not journalists, that we don't have First Amendment protection. The case law says we do. Not everyone has to have the editorial board of The New York Times in their back pocket to vet their utterances. So I think there is a double standard emerging in the law. The mainstream media, you know, The New York Times, CNN, the large networks, they're going to be held to one standard which is permissive because they're going to be assumed to be doing the responsible thing, vetting, fact-checking. Those of us who don't have those resources are going to be penalized for speaking our minds and the elimination of actual malice.

1:38:49 as a standard is going to have an inhibiting effect on speech, speech of ordinary people, people like you, people like me. Well, that's right. If you're not a big powerful corporation, you don't get speech because you're not, you know, have a huge fact checking group behind you. That's obviously a bunch of corporate liars. Thank you so much, Norm Pettus for talking to us. Look forward to speaking to you again soon. Thanks for having me, Alex. Be well. for saying this four plus years ago and then that was the slow decline they kind of locked him up and we didn't hear much from him then I predicted what happened they would wait till people forgot about him by shutting him down and then get rid of him totally vindicated a real hero the Durham investigation will be able to lay it all out on the other side or here in just a moment but I wanted to play a short compilation of him back at the time 2017 doing what no other mainstream media person would do tell the truth here it is

CHAPTER 21 / 33 Discussion

Judge Andrew Napolitano, Vindicated on Spying Claims

Judge Andrew Napolitano joins the broadcast to discuss his vindication regarding claims that the Obama administration spied on Donald Trump. Napolitano was sidelined at Fox News in 2017 for reporting that GCHQ was used to surveil Trump Tower. He notes that John Durham’s recent filings confirm that federal assets were indeed used to spy on Trump during his campaign and presidency.

andrew napolitano· fox news· spying· donald trump· john durham

1:39:48 Former judge and frequent Fox News contributor Andrew Napolitano has reportedly been taken off the air for now. Multiple outlets say Napolitano has been sidelined at Fox for repeating on-air unverified claims that former President Obama asked UK intelligence to spy on Trump Tower. Did Barack Obama spy on Donald Trump when President Obama was in the White House? and President Trump was Mr. Trump running for office? Well, we don't really know the answer to that. Sources have told Fox News that President Obama could very easily have and probably did use a foreign intelligence service to gather this information for him. Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command. He used GCHQ.

1:40:37 What the heck is GCHQ? That's the initials for the British spying agency. Both White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer and President Trump defended accusations against Obama by pointing to Napolitano. Fox News' Shepard Smith walked back Napolitano's claim shortly thereafter. Fox News cannot confirm Judge Napolitano's commentary. Fox News knows of no evidence of any kind that the now president of the United States was surveilled at any time in any way, full stop. All right, so. Four plus years later, Judge Napolitano totally vindicated. We're about two minutes from break. But sir, I know you're not about vindicating yourself, but we could see you getting penalized, shut down, and then removed from error for telling the truth and going after Obama, Hillary, the whole deep state. Now you, I mean, you are like going to be the image of the dictionary next to the word vindication now. Thanks for joining us on short notice, Judge.

1:41:34 You're very kind to say that, Alex, and thank you for running those old clips when my hair was a little darker. Look, I mean, I woke up yesterday morning like everybody else did. I hadn't paid attention to what Durham had filed over the weekend. But we now know that a significant arm of the federal government armed with FBI agents and CIA agents used federal assets to spy on Mr. Donald Trump during his presidential campaign and on President Donald Trump after he was already the president of the United States. We now know that and the federal government of the United States acknowledges it, and if it has to, is prepared to prove it in court in the case against Michael Sussman.

1:42:22 Is that the craziest thing in your career? I mean, in my life, I've never seen anything like this. This is crazy. Well, it was crazy because nobody would accept it. Nobody wanted to accept it. People came to me and begged to me, you owe President Obama an apology. For what? You know, about three months later, five GCHQ that's British intelligence agents, went to the Guardian of London, a left-wing publication, and said, that judge in New York is correct. We didn't personally do it, but we know who did. So there was somewhat of a vindication then. The United States government, the Obama administration, still didn't accept it. But the filing from John Durham on Friday afternoon is so definitive

1:43:15 There's no way he could have made that filing unless he has the absolute proof to substantiate it. And of course, it gets deeper and- I was about to say it gets deeper, sir. Please stay there. We're right back. You're going to have the floor. We're so honored to have you because this is so big of the future of our country to expose this bureaucratic coup. We'll be right back. Well, I got to tell you, ladies and gentlemen, I am starstruck right now because I've always loved Judge Knapp, watching him decades on TV. I got to interview him before and hang out with him some in New York. But Now that he's vindicated and been punished and basically taken off the air for telling the truth, suspended and then phased out for exposing illegal deep state spying, and now we know it wasn't just the British.

1:43:57 It wasn't just these private corporations, but then the government was involved and the wheels are coming off this and we're just blessed to have him here to lay this all out. Be sure and bookmark his site and find his weekday show, judgeknapp.com. Judge, I wonder, I'm not going to criticize Fox News or others, but are they going to have you on for a victory lap now that you're so incredibly vindicated? I mean, that's probably a tongue in cheek question, but You were saying this is a huge deal. It certainly is. Explain to us why this is so definitive and what this Durham investigation means. And now the former head of national intelligence and all these folks say dozens of more indictments are coming out because they quote gave Durham the documents. What does all this mean?

CHAPTER 22 / 33 Discussion

Durham Investigation, Statute of Limitations and Michael Sussman

Judge Napolitano explains the legal nuances of the Durham investigation, focusing on the indictment of Michael Sussman for lying to the FBI. He discusses the five-year statute of limitations and how it might apply to a conspiracy that extended into the Trump presidency. Napolitano highlights the lack of mainstream media coverage regarding the use of federal assets to undermine a sitting president.

john durham· michael sussman· statute of limitations· fbi· hillary clinton

1:44:42 Well, I don't know about the indictments because some of these crimes have a five-year statute of limitations and much of this happened in 2016, so do the math. We're beyond the five years, which means Hillary herself may skate. However, If this was a conspiracy, and apparently it was, and if John Durham can report it, the five years is measured when the crime is completed, not when the crime started. So it would depend how far into the Trump administration the conspiracy extended. If the conspiracy ended on Election Day,

1:45:17 It's too late to do anything about it, but it appears from the documents that John Durham filed on Friday afternoon that the conspiracy did not end on Election Day. It appears that there was a conversation in the Oval Office after Trump was elected, in which President Obama himself participated, and discussions were had about using federal assets to spy on him. And there are two very interesting people present there besides President Obama. One is Jake Sullivan. who was Mrs. Clinton's chief intelligence advisor on spying and intelligence matters. He's now President Joe Biden's national security director. He has the highest national security clearance in the country. It's the same as the president's. The other interesting person there was Vice President Joe Biden. Now, this of course was four years ago. Was he part

1:46:18 Alex, was he part of the conspiracy to undermine Donald Trump's presidency by using federal assets? You know, you can compare this to Watergate. Watergate was the use of private assets paid for by the Republican National Committee to break into an office and seize proof of who is having sex with whom and who was paying who off. This is the use of federal assets. Jim Comey, all the way on the left there. John Brennan, head of the FBI at the time. John Brennan, all the way on the right there, head of the CIA at the time. So this is according to Durham.

1:47:02 the use of federal assets to undermine a presidency. Now that is a half dozen different crimes there. It would just depend upon when these crimes were committed or when this conspiracy ended or how much fortitude Durham has and who he goes after. So there's been a lot of criticism of Durham taking years and years, but to me, I'm not a famous judge like you or a legal scholar, but this is like a super big ballsy move to do this with Merrick Garland as the attorney general and all this. I mean, this is like the hydrogen bomb effect because we knew it was going on. I should ask you how you knew from your sources, but we had our sources. We were talking about it too. But this is just such a big deal. This has got to really concern, as you said, not just Hillary, but clearly this goes above that.

1:47:48 Well, you know, it does. And I know you want to talk about this eventually. Why? Why isn't the media covering this? Why? Why is Infowars and Newsmax and Fox News and The Wall Street Journal? Exactly. I should have said that first. No one's covering. I mean, this makes Watergate look like a child's play. I mean, this is huge. It does. Yes, it does. This should be Never mind my allegations against the Obama administration. This is proof from a federal prosecutor. This should be on the front page, top of the fold. of the same Washington Post that brought Richard Nixon down and the same New York Times that claims it's the standard in American journalism. But you haven't heard a peep about them. You haven't heard it on CNN or MSNBC or CNBC or any of the networks. They think and hope that by ignoring this, it will go away. Now, it could go away

1:48:46 If Michael Sussman pleads guilty, that's the lawyer accused of lying to the FBI, who was a lawyer for Hillary Clinton's campaign. Because he pleaded not guilty and there will be a trial, this stuff will come out at the trial. Now I got to say a word about the crime that Sussman's charged with. I don't believe it should be a crime to lie to the FBI. Why? Because the Supreme Court has said the FBI can lie to you. Well, if the FBI can lie to you, you should be able to lie to them. They're not morally superior to you. But I am wrong. The law is what it is. If you lie to the FBI in an official inquiry,

1:49:24 you can be indicted and prosecuted. That's what happened to Sussman. And Judge, let me interrupt you because I'm always interested about this. That's why I won't talk to the FBI. I won't talk to the Jan 6th committee. It's not that I'm going to lie. It's that they're going to say I'm a liar and indict me. So it's not just that you can't lie to them. They then say you're lying and play little split hairs games. When did that become the law that you can't lie to the FBI? Oh, I don't know, but it's been the law for a long time and the FBI will use it to the help. Here's a you know, in the Martha Stewart case. In the same conversation in which she lied to them, they lied to her. The FBI agent who lied to her got a promotion. She went to jail. She was convicted of lying. This is considered a low-level crime. The maximum penalty is just a year in jail. To a lawyer, it's devastating because you'll lose your license to practice. But the committee that you talk about sought you. In the Sussman case, he sought the FBI.

1:50:23 He knocked on the door and said, I have to come to you. I have devastating information about this guy Donald Trump and his connections to Russia. Question, are you representing the Hillary Clinton campaign? Oh, no, no, no, no. I have this from independent sources. That's the alleged lie. He instigated the conversation himself, during which it is alleged that he lied. And he had the conversation with his now former friend, Peter Baker, who was the general counsel of the FBI. Normally, you don't get to talk to the general counsel about this evidence. But when you're a high-ranking, big-shot Washington, D.C. lawyer, and the general counsel is your friend, and you want to feed him some nonsense, that's the guy you go to.

1:51:06 Wow, we're gonna go to break and come back. This is just riveting. Judge Andrew Napolitano, I know you want to make this about yourself, but just in 50 seconds here, I mean, how did you know all this stuff? I guess sources? Because you've been proven right. Well, yes, I had sources. One of my sources outed himself, and the New York Times went for his jugular. But something of this magnitude, you have to verify it to three levels. So in addition to the source who outed himself, I had two other sources who were able to verify what I said before I said it.

CHAPTER 23 / 33 Discussion

Deep State Conspiracy, Obama and the Oval Office Meeting

The discussion turns to a potential conspiracy involving Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and high-ranking intelligence officials like John Brennan and Jim Comey. Napolitano suggests that Durham may be targeting an agreement to use government assets to spy on the president-elect. He notes that the spying likely continued through the inauguration, citing the FBI's interview with General Flynn as evidence.

barack obama· john durham· jake sullivan· jim comey· conspiracy

1:51:43 Wow, Judge Andrew Napolitano is with us. You've got to bookmark his site and watch his show. I watch it all the time, judgenap.com. And man, I just thought of him instantly this weekend when this all broke. I was like, oh my gosh. Because I mean, he was one of the top guys at Fox. As soon as he covered this, bloop, they phased his ass out. And that's what people pay for, to tell the truth. We'll be right back. He's a hero. Well, completely vindicated, the capital V, Judge Andrew Napolitano joins us. The minute in 2017, he covered illegal spying against the Trump campaign and President Trump from his sources. They suspended him and then basically pulled him off TV until he was finally let go. And that was the reason for that. We could all see it. And he's a tough guy. He's not whining about it. He wants to just talk about the current news and how big this is. But wow, Clinton campaign paid to infiltrate Judge Napolitano broke all this again. Trump campaign paid to infiltrate Trump Tower.

1:52:45 White House servers to link Trump to Russia durham fines and he's got the evidence and he's indicted the Clinton lawyer and We know all this went on and as you said they outed themselves They had a New York Times article on January 20th 2017 where they bragged that they had wiretapped Trump and claimed that was the evidence He was a Russian but there was no evidence. So that was the first outing then Napolitano dug into it and and found out more. So I could ask a thousand questions, Judge, but in the 25 minutes we've got left, I'd like to just give you the floor, just the run of this show as the guy that tried to stop this deep state coup against America on what's currently happening, how you think they're going to respond back to this, what does Hillary, what does Obama do? Because what do you call this? That's my first question in this segment.

1:53:34 Do we call it Obama's spygate, Hillary's spygate? Do we call this a deep state coup against America? What do we call this scandal of scandals? You know, that's a good question. Somebody who's good at this stuff will put a handle on it and that handle will last. But the law will call this a conspiracy and an agreement to break laws. And that's really the danger to Mrs. Clinton. Because if this conspiracy continued on into 2017, probably up to the time that President Trump fired Jim Comey, which is May of 17. Well, that's fewer than five years ago. Five years is the statute of limitations. So the statute begins to run when the crime is committed. If you pull a trigger and kill somebody, that's when the crime is committed.

1:54:29 But if it takes that person two or three months to die, the statute of limitations doesn't start to run until they die. If you have a conspiracy to interfere with a valid election of a president of the United States, I'm talking about the election of Donald Trump in 2016, and that conspiracy continues into 2017, even after he's the president. Well, that is fewer than five years ago because the statute of limitations is five years. So those who are breathing a sigh of relief probably have more to worry about than they think they do. When John Ratcliffe, the former congressman from Texas and former director of national intelligence under Donald Trump told my former colleagues at Fox News just this past weekend

1:55:23 That there may be some indictments coming. I'm pretty sure that's Radcliffe. I'm pretty sure that's what he was he was talking about. So if Mrs. Clinton and Jake Sullivan and John Brennan and. Jim Comey entered into an agreement in the fall of 2016, and that agreement carried into the presidency of Donald Trump until Comey was fired in May of 2017. Well, May of 2017 is fewer than five years ago. So Durham then has time to present all of this to a grand jury and ask them to indict. On the other hand, if the conspiracy ended,

1:56:03 at the election of Donald Trump in November of 16, well then those who want to see these characters prosecuted are out of luck. But what Durham is saying is this continued on into the White House and if you look at this and the things they said and did, I mean, I think that's where Durham's going. What do you think's happening? I think that's where he's going as well. And he very well may be targeting the former president, Barack Obama. I mean, if Barack Obama convened a group of people, if he convened a group of people in the Oval Office, which included Jack Brennan, whom you see there, then the head of the CIA, Jim Comey, the head of the FBI, Mrs. Clinton, Joe Biden, Jake Sullivan, and himself, and they agreed

1:56:56 to use the assets of the federal government to spy on and thus undermine the president-elect who was about to become the President of the United States, then we have a very, very serious problem on our hands. Now, let me suggest this to you. We know the spying was going on at least up until the time of the inauguration, because two days after the inauguration is the FBI's infamous visit to General Flynn in his office in the White House. And they were able to ask him questions and get him to contradict what they knew he had said on the phone to the Russian ambassador just a week or so before.

1:57:43 So were they spying on the Russian ambassador or spying on General Flynn after he was announced he was going to be the chief, the national security advisor to then President-elect Trump, or were they spying on both? I know you don't like to speculate, but just as a guy that's been around the block a few times, gut level, where do you think this goes? Who do you think is most concerned? Because I remember things like Jim Comey testifying to Congress, I never talked to the press. I'm not involved in leaking and later, well, I did call the head of a major university so he could tell the press. Well, that's the same thing. If I'm a mafia boss and I tell my underling to go have somebody killed, I'm just as guilty. So I don't get out Comey tells Congress, I never leaked. I just leaked through somebody else. That doesn't make sense. Well, look, John Durham would have been unwise

1:58:37 to have filed the document that he did last Friday laying all this out. A, if he couldn't prove it, and B, if he wasn't prepared to prove it. Because he doesn't really need to go through this just to prove that this fellow Michael Sussman told a lie to the then-General Counsel of the FBI. You know, there's one thing about prosecutors, and this is good and bad. They always like to prove their worth. I mean, it is the rare prosecutor that spends a fortune, that's Durham, that spends a fortune in government money to investigate and then doesn't indict because then he's got to justify what the hell did you spend all that money on? So you're saying they have their case, just like a mafia case, they're going after the Clinton lawyer and then to Clinton and then to Obama, Brennan, all the deep state players. I think there's a rational argument to support that, Alex. You said it better than I could.

1:59:33 Look, just in those days when I made these allegations about the Brits spying on Trump, well, there's Jim Clapper in the middle. Now, he skated. He lied under oath. when he was asked by a liberal Democratic Senator Wyden from Oregon, does the government spy on Americans? And he said no. And then he said not wittingly. And then about a month or so later, he in a letter apologized and admitted he had lied under oath and they decided not to prosecute him. That event was well more than five years ago, but that was public perjury.

2:00:13 over information that we all knew he was lying about. The questioner, Senator Wyden, knew he was lying about it. Anybody that followed Edward Snowden knew that he was lying about it. But here's what I was saying before your producers put up the photograph of Jim Clapper. The concept that prosecutors need to justify their worth is well known in the legal community. Durham is a lifelong prosecutor. I don't think he would have put that stuff out there last Friday if he didn't intend to demonstrate it. And if Sussman pleads guilty, then Durham's only forum in which to demonstrate this will be a trial against somebody else whom he has yet to indict.

2:01:03 And the whole question is statute of limitations. But if you get into ongoing, you know they were spying after that, that will lead to the later spying during the four years of Trump. And then now it's a bunch of other investigations. Judge Andrew Napolitano is on fire and is the Phoenix vindicated. I mean, wow. I remember when he came out and said they were spying on Trump with evidence. I said, that guy's not gonna be on air very long. And he wasn't, but he is still on air and regrowing his show. We really support him and appreciate him. We'll be right back. Stay with us. Well, you know, I admire people that are male, female, black, white, Hispanic, Asian, old, young. You know who they are? They're the trailblazers. They're the mavericks. They're the people that time and time again I watch it and listen to or observe in life who are being truthful, that are being honest, and that really know what they're talking about. That's who I admire.

CHAPTER 24 / 33 Discussion

Totalitarianism and Vaccine Mandates, Nuremberg Protocols

Judge Napolitano characterizes the current political climate as "totalitarianism on steroids," citing the January 6th Committee and Justin Trudeau’s actions in Canada. He argues that vaccine mandates violate the Nuremberg Protocols, which prohibit government compulsion for experimental medical treatments. Napolitano encourages listeners to maintain their courage and bodily autonomy against government and pharmaceutical pressure.

vaccine mandates· nuremberg protocols· justin trudeau· fbi· andrew napolitano

2:01:51 More and more, though, the corporate media is dying. Even Fox's ratings are down, but nothing compared to CNN, with 100,000 viewers on average, MSNBC. Because people know that's not genuine. It's okay if we make mistakes sometimes, but the people know we're trying to tell them the truth because we respect them, because we respect ourselves. And Judge Andrew Napolitano got phased out because that was the move he made. Telling the truth when everybody else knew Trump was being spied on, they bragged they were spying on him. Oh, we know he's a Russian, we're spying on him. Napolitano's like, boom, I got you. Goes and looks it up, goes after him, they come after him. So people want men and women to do the right things.

2:02:31 But then when we do the right thing, some people don't back us. So I know you don't want to talk about yourself all day, Judge Napolitano, but any other points about the Durham investigation, how big this is, other key angles? And then I just want to ask you in closing in the 10 minutes we have left or nine minutes we have left, just in general, your view on vaccine mandates and open borders and Biden's low approval rating and just any other, I mean, because I could talk to you for 10 hours about things happening in the world and just your view of where humanity is right now, Judge. Well, Alex, you know, you and I have been friends for years and I have admired your work for years. And you also have suffered at the hands of people who press buttons in the world because you've not hesitated to tell the truth.

2:03:19 And I think the overwhelming majority of the people watching and listening to us now would agree with what I just said about you. You are a hero to many, many, many people. Your ratings are astronomical. And that's because you always say what you believe to be the truth and you have the means with which to back it up. You know, other than what I said about knowing the prosecutorial mindset and knowing that John Durham has that mindset, he needs to justify himself. I really don't think he's going to stop at the indictment of Michael Sussman, Hillary Clinton's former campaign lawyer, for what's considered a low-level crime because the punishment is often not even incarceration.

2:04:05 lying to the FBI. If you lie to the FBI and send them on a wild goose chase and they spent a fortune chasing down your lie, well then they're going to come after you very aggressively. But if the FBI knows at the moment you lied to them that it was a lie, then they're not going to come after you aggressively, unless they have nothing else to come after you for. So during the Reagan administration, there's a famous arrest on a Brooklyn street corner In the years and the days when we used to have phone booths, the FBI had cornered a major Colombian drug dealer, but they had no evidence. They knew in their hearts who he was, but they had no evidence with which to arrest him. He got out of the phone booth and an FBI agent went up to him and said, hey, buddy, what's your name? And he said, Nancy Reagan.

2:04:54 and they arrested him for lying to the FBI. That led to the acquisition of evidence against him and a prosecution and a lifetime sentence. But without some hook on which to hang their hats, which came out of his own mouth, they wouldn't have been able to do it. On the other hand, if they want to frame you, as you know they can and have done, as they did to Martha Stewart, as they would try to do to you, then your best bet is not to talk to them. Okay, I'm glad you raised that because that's a question I meant to ask you and I'd forgotten. What do you make of January 6th? I've been subpoenaed. We offered them, hey, you want my emails with all my text messages? I'll give you written statement answers, but I'm not going to have you twist this into a perjury trap and they just didn't do that. So now they may give me immunity. I don't even know anything. I wasn't, I mean, we tried to have peaceful demonstrations. What do you make of this January 6th?

2:05:45 And now they've got the new terrorism directive by the president saying questioning elections or questioning lockdowns is terror. And then Trudeau's declared a civil emergency and they're gonna grab bank accounts without court orders. What do you make of this climate? Well, the climate is reprehensible. It's totalitarianism on steroids. You and our mutual friend and colleague, in my case, a boyhood friend, Roger Stone did the right thing when the committee summons you. Don't play footsie with them. the way Mark Meadows was a decent human being. I've known Mark since his early days in Congress. Don't play footsie with them. Don't give them some things and then decide to throw up your hands if you don't like the questions they're answering you. Don't answer a single question except who you are and how they can reach you. That's the way you and Roger Stone dealt with it. In terms of Trudeau, he's just as bad as his father.

2:06:46 There's no national emergency. The statute itself defines national emergency as one where the government is unable to protect the security and freedom of Canada, not one in which the roads are clogged. But that statute, which he has triggered, gives him tremendous power, as you say, to arrest without warrant or evidence and without preferring charges against the people arrested, to confiscate bank accounts, to confiscate trucks, to confiscate insurance policies on the trucks, which of course is insane.

2:07:23 Because then you got a 16-wheeler on the highway without insurance on it. So he's just reprehensible. The vaccines have been campaigning against them for a long time. It's not a vaccine, as you have said. A vaccine gives you a small dose of the disease, your body fights it off, you have the immunity and the antibodies forever. This is a chemical cocktail which is an experiment at lessening the effects of the disease. It doesn't prevent you from getting it, it doesn't prevent you from transmitting it. The Supreme Court has ruled several times, you control your own body. You decide what goes into it. The government of the United States of America signed a treaty called the Nuremberg Protocols, which prohibit the use of government compulsion to take experimental chemicals into the body. So we are on very solid ground legally and morally, but big government, big pharma,

2:08:23 And big medicine have persuaded the public that they are right and we are wrong. So again, it takes courage. The truck drivers in Canada have to be courageous. People like you need to be courageous. People listening to us now need to recognize that they decide what goes in their bodies, not Dr. Fauci and not the government. Beautifully said. I see your clips on YouTube, watch them all the time. I've also tuned into your amazing podcast because you're not just, you know, handicapped by 10 minutes a day on Fox on a few shows. You can really get into deep thought. It's amazing. Judging freedom. Everybody should search that on the different platforms and follow it.

2:09:03 JudgeNap.com, you can find it all there as well. Judging Freedom, available on YouTube, Judge Andrew Napolitano. Judge, thank you so much for the time, and again, I know you've been through a lot for telling the truth, and I just appreciate you for myself, my crew, and my family. Thank you so much for being a great American. Thank you, Alex, it's a pleasure. Anytime I'm available for you. God bless you. God bless you, thank you. Wow, that's a real American right there, folks. That's the real deal. He didn't back down. when the attacks were going on. He was put through hell, and now he's been vindicated. Wow. Look, I got the whole next hour to do, and I got a bunch of clips I haven't got to, and I said I'd take calls today, and I haven't done that yet. That's why I'm gonna start the nighttime show three hours, couple nights a week, with no commercials, so I can just take call after call after call after call, because the calls are my favorite thing, but it makes me mad with the breaks and everything. And I'm not mad at our stations. We would have been deplatformed and off the air when they shut us down on Facebook and Twitter and YouTube and everywhere else.

CHAPTER 25 / 33 Discussion

InfoWars Nighttime Show, Resistance to Globalism

The host announces plans for a commercial-free nighttime show to allow for more listener calls and uninterrupted discussion. He expresses outrage over reports of the "euthanasia" of people with Down syndrome and links it to a broader collectivist agenda. Invoking Thomas Jefferson, he vows eternal resistance against tyranny and the "low-level" evil of the globalist elite.

infowars· globalism· thomas jefferson· eugenics· down syndrome

2:10:00 Roku, the list went on and on. If it wasn't for our now 300 plus AM and FM affiliates and global shortwave and satellite and TV stations. But I get driven crazy by 15 minutes or 14 minutes of ads an hour. So I'm going to keep doing this show and I'm going to start. I've already started it. You see me almost every Saturday doing a two, three hour commercial free show and you see the other things we're doing. We're just fighting as hard as we can, folks. I mean, believe me, I'm pretty tired sometimes, but every time I think about these globalists and how damn evil they are and then I'm just going to give up and then they're going to have their way with everybody. No, no, ladies and gentlemen, I'm going 110% here. And all I'm asking for is your word of mouth, your prayer and your financial support.

2:10:45 And you've got somebody that will not let you down if you don't let me down. So go to infowarestore.com. It ends on Wednesday. We've extended it 25% off first time in four years on the storable food. You cannot beat the deal. They have it in stock, ready to ship their full catalog. Infowarestore.com, preparewithalex.com. And we've got X3. It's gonna sell out in about four weeks at current sales rates. So I'm gonna stop that sale in about six days. Then we'll go back to regular price. If you don't know what Deep Earth, Crystal iodine with the other types of iodine combined do for your body. You've not experienced x3 you need it You need to experience it. It's all at info or store.com the activated charcoal concentrated toothpaste The super coral whitening toothpaste is a super silver original brand under a new name It's all there at info war store.com or triple-a two five three three one three nine in the arena in the fight with the globalist I'm Alex Jones our number four straight ahead

2:11:41 Sold out for months, X3 is now back in stock. Ladies and gentlemen, just like our information is game-changing, our products are game-changing. And so many people are deficient in iodine. It's not the soil anymore. Most of it, the ocean, is contaminated. But when you get high-quality triiodine, all three of the healthy types together, it does amazing things for your stamina, your libido, but most importantly, your immune system. So, X3, the only triiodine on the market. Highest grade is now exclusively available again at 50% off at mfoldershore.com. If you've not experienced clean, pure iodine and what it does for your body, it takes about two weeks to kick in on average.

2:12:27 You really need to experience X3. Those of you that have tried it and used it, I know you're gonna be reordering it. But particularly those that haven't ever tried the product, you need it because it's amazing what it does for your body. It's the good halogen, not the bad halogen. And it funds the Info Award, a true 360 win. So again, X3, back in stock, 50% off for a limited time. You are in the arena with Alejandro Emmerich-Jones. Man, this has been an incredible broadcast today. We've had some amazing guests on. And we're just getting started. You know, this last Friday I saw it in my box, in my little email box, and I didn't watch it because I was too busy. And then I watched it Saturday morning and it made me physically sick because when I watched it, tens of thousands of pieces of data came into my little brain. And I remembered all the leftist shows celebrating the euthanasia of Down syndrome people, humans.

2:13:33 And, you know, if we kill the least of us, and I'm not saying the least of us, that's a Christ quote. We see it as the least of us. They've done that to Christ. And so we're going to air that coming up in the last segment of this hour. And I mean, I checked it. It's got like 100,000 views a few days ago. Can we look it up, see what it has now? The damn thing needs 50 million views. And I'm not bitching at anybody that it had 50 million views. I'm just saying they're euthanizing Down syndrome humans. You feel safe at night knowing they're doing that, right? I sure as hell don't. Yeah, 183,000 views now. They literally put her on a bioethics chart, because you know what's worse than being white, right? In the official bioethics boards of lot, I don't know how many, but it's a lot of them. I don't have the statistics because they're not out. A lot of your big hospital groups

2:14:29 do not give medical care to white people now, whether it's monoclonal antibodies, you name it. And they say right there, I've heard Dutch TV, British TV, they're like, hey, you're a Down syndrome man. Yeah, I am. You know, you cost five times more in the welfare on average. Why the hell did you let us create welfare to get rid of families so you could then say let's cut people off because we're collectivist? Oh, you're a conservative. You don't get heart surgery. Oh, you didn't take a vaccine. You don't get a kidney. You don't get... No, we know what you're doing. You're getting us dependent on you so you can cut stuff off, we know. That makes you let us feel real good to kill a Down syndrome person. On record, I'm sorry she's Down syndrome.

2:15:15 She ain't getting medical care. We need to get rid of this lady." And that's what Bayer Pharmaceutical, 14 years ago, they settled the cases and the documents were put out. Part of the settlement, because the families didn't want a bunch of money, they wanted to stop, unlike other people that sue everybody. And it was in France, it was in Australia, and a couple other Canada. They firebombed the Hemophiliac Society for exposing it, but that didn't stop them, that didn't intimidate them. And they released the documents where in Australia and France, the executives were talking to each other and they said, We've infected millions of ampules of factor VIII with HIV and hepatitis, and it's going to be a death sentence for millions of people." And the head guy came back and said, there's too many hemophiliacs, let's get rid of them. They went, yeah, let's do it. Oh my God. So now, because you bleed too much, you get to die. Or because you got an extra chromosome, you get to die. Yeah, I got an idea. How about the people that want to kill everybody start dying?

2:16:21 Because I don't need to kill people to feel powerful. I've already got all that genetics. I've already got all that handled. That's like low-level stuff I got. It's in the arsenal. It's sitting right there. It's the best you can get. The best at war. The best at killing. The best at operations. The best at everything that's low-level. But you know what's harder? Growing crops, taking care of children, designing technology, stepping up for weak people. That's what's hard! Not all you people that think screwing over weak people, that's not strong. Now there's one thing I do before I'm dead. We are gonna get you people that have done this to all these innocents and you're gonna pay hard for what you've done. I swear in front of God, on the altar of God, as Thomas Jefferson did, eternal resistance against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. I will come back and hit more news. There's so much to hit in T-minus 60 seconds.

CHAPTER 26 / 33 Discussion

Censorship of Nuremberg 2 Video, Spiritual Warfare

A video calling for a "Nuremberg 2" trial for health officials is reportedly being censored by Big Tech platforms like Twitter. The host frames the fight against globalism as a form of spiritual warfare, urging listeners to connect with the "Holy Spirit" and the "communal spirit of liberty." He argues that the intensity of propaganda proves that the globalists fear the strength of the resistance.

censorship· nuremberg 2· big tech· spiritual warfare· holy spirit

2:17:21 But every day we're on is a precious day. The enemy's getting ready to turn the power off next. Get ready for the fake cyber attack. All right, folks, I got some really big news to hit right now on this Tuesday emergency broadcast. It is so incredibly intense. You know, I didn't let the COVID news, even though that's central, get in the way of the big broadcast today. I hit all the other news. The martial law in Canada, which is a response of humans fighting the cup of tyranny. Russia pulling their troops back from the border and the media trying to spin that. The Durham investigation and so much more. But wow, I mean, the news I'm seeing here is just beautiful human resistance to tyranny basically everywhere. And that's a great thing. But we can sit here and fight tyranny all day until we realize something that's really important in my view.

2:18:21 And that's that 90% of people serving evil actually believe those of us that are fighting them are the evil ones. And so I just want to reach out to those new listeners and people that are tuning in wanting to find out what this Alex Jones thing is about today, just to listen to me really, really carefully. Most of you, I guess, didn't get a chance growing up to run into this information and didn't get the head start I did. But believe me, I know what I'm talking about. And believe me, all I want is good for you and good for me and good for us together into the future. And the people you're serving in the Democratic Party or the corporate systems worldwide are out to get you and are like robots. They don't have any empathy and they don't care about you and they don't want to empower the oppressed. They don't want to empower humanity because they're weak. It's hard to care about people. It's hard to be informed.

2:19:19 But the lazy just join with evil. And I know a lot of average low-level people join with evil too. That's the big trick that the upper echelon of evil sells to the low-level echelons of evil. Go ahead and be corrupt, go ahead and be evil, you'll get ahead. But you're not getting ahead. You are digging your grave and our collective graves deeper and deeper by the minute as you do that. Now, I was sitting there as we came back from break looking for my COVID stack because it's like five inches thick. I don't know why. I don't know why I can't find it. It's just too much. But I do have the clips here, at least. Look, there's only like 25 of these that are all insane. But here's a big one. I've seen this medical doctor on Australian national TV. But he sounds like he's British. He's got a British accent. He's a medical doctor and I've seen him for the last year and a half warning what was happening. But the point is, is that when I was sent this on Twitter this morning by a friend, I went there and it said, sorry, you can't see this.

2:20:25 It's not just, oh, this is dangerous, click here if you want to not go to it, click here if you want to. It was, oh, this is dangerous, you can't see it. So then I searched what I saw in the headline and found another link, but it said, oh, you can't share this, this is disinformation. Like I'm a two-year-old and can't decide for myself what's true. In fact, I got a screenshot of it right here, I'll pull it up. Now, of course, what did I do when this happened this morning? I got mad, and I sent it out to about 20 people I know.

2:21:04 You'd pass all the dog and kid photos. I got my phone here since this morning. I take so many photos. But, yeah, overhead shot this for me. This is what it says on the one minute 53 second video. If you can zoom in on that a little bit more. It says, learn why health officials consider COVID-19 vaccines safe for most people. And then it says, this tweet cannot be replied to, shared or liked. Now, what's he calling for? He's calling for Nuremberg too.

2:21:46 So what did I do when they did that? I sent to the producers to grab the high quality club and then I sat there on a group text to more than a hundred major talk show host I know including Joe Rogan and I sent them that link. Now you could do that with your friends and family that action because I'm already seeing the effects will be many times bigger than me talking about it today. And I just point that out that even though I've got a big show, and even though I've got this awesome audience of activists, it's the stuff I do in the dirt, at the point-blank range is what I call it, that has the biggest effect, just like you are. And I'm here to tell you, and I pat you on the head and say, you're amazing. I'm not just saying that because you feel good about it. You are everything. When you decide to move,

2:22:33 When you decide to take action, when you decide you're not laying down anymore, I can feel your strength and it makes me stronger and I make you stronger and that is our communal spirit of liberty and freedom the Holy Spirit gave us. We're not just meant to commune with God. God is meant to direct us, energize us, and then we connect to others and that forms the body of Christ and it's strong. And it's got the future in its hand, and it's got the destiny of our children, and the will of who we are, and this satanic new world order telling us we're racist, and we're ugly, and we're bad, and we're genetically inferior, and we need Big Pharma to save us is a lie!

2:23:14 And it must be and it will be resisted by simply saying, no, I see through you. And I want to be persecuted by Google and Twitter and Facebook. I want to be lied about. I want to be attacked, not because it's fun, but because I know that I'm in the fight when I'm getting hit. If you're laying out on the beach, not a care in the world, counting all your little monies in the bank, Are you really happy? And the answer is no. Those people are all empty as hell, always chasing something that doesn't exist. But when you're in the arena, when you're in the fight, when you're in God's will, when you're following that journey, when you're in that river of God's consciousness, you are so empowered and so enlightened and so fulfilled and so strong, it's embarrassing because you realize it's not you, it's

2:24:10 millisecond by millisecond, they're like eons in God's mind. God just empowering every atom in your body, everything in your soul. You literally exist because God, millisecond to millisecond, is creating you in his mind. That's incredible. And that's what you want to be part of forever. Because God is not a god of slavery, but a free will. And if you reject that consciousness, God will spit you out. and the worst thing in eternity, the worst thing in existence in all dimensions is separation from God. Here is the censored video they don't want you to see about Nuremberg 2. The science is settled.

CHAPTER 27 / 33 Discussion

Dr. Roger Hodgkinson, State-Sanctioned Murder Allegations

Dr. Roger Hodgkinson, a pathologist in Ottawa, accuses medical colleges and governments of "state-sanctioned murder" through COVID-19 mandates. He argues that the principles of "first do no harm" and "informed consent" have been trampled. Hodgkinson claims that physicians have been intimidated into silence, preventing patients from receiving the truth about experimental treatments.

roger hodgkinson· medical ethics· informed consent· covid-19· canada

2:24:52 There's an overwhelming consensus that nothing worked. Nothing could work, nothing did work, and nothing will work. That includes the vaccinations which are not just unnecessary, experimental, untested, and are actually killing people. I want to take this moment to point a finger directly at the principal cause of why we're all here today. And it's not the government. No, it's us physicians. who have been intimidated by our colleges, both provincially and internationally. If physicians had not been intimidated by the very body that's supposed to protect you from me, if they'd been allowed to speak their mind without the threat of losing their income and their positions, then an individual patient, such as you and me in a closed examining room, would have been told the truth. The truth

2:25:49 They have been denied that ability to do that. We have had that for centuries. The two principal medical ethics have been trampled on by this government. First do no harm and informed consent. First do no harm has been trampled on. The mandates have killed, as we've heard, more people, many more people than they've saved. But informed consent, I will put it to you, how can you give informed consent if you are not informed? and you have been denied information intentionally by the colleges that are supposed to protect you. So I say this, putting a point on it, the colleges of physicians and surgeons across this country and internationally are co-conspirators with government in state-sanctioned murder. Thank you. Thank you. Dr. Roger Hodgkinson is a pathologist

2:26:49 in Ottawa, Canada, but he's been speaking about what's happening in Australia, in the UK, the US, you name it. And he's come out and said, you have a violation of the Nuremberg Code, and the doctors that have gone along with this are guilty as well. And they don't want the censored clip of him saying, you are guilty. So is big tech. So is big pharma. But also the doctors that know what's happening and are scared to tell people, their cowardice now makes them people that are aiding and abetting this eugenics depopulation operation where they hope to corrupt the medical community by getting them involved in this evil. Once they've covered up this lie, well now they'll cover up any lie. The clip is so important we're going to post it to Infowars.com. I hope you share the clip. Now separately here's some of the other news we've got. This is just amazing. This is a real photo here in the United States

CHAPTER 28 / 33 Discussion

Social Credit in America, HIV Recalls and Vaccine Side Effects

The segment discusses the emergence of social credit-style restrictions in the US, such as vaccine requirements for indoor seating. It highlights reports of 50 million vaccine doses being recalled due to "false HIV positives" and claims that medical workers are seeing AIDS-like conditions in vaccinated patients. The host criticizes Hollywood elites for ignoring mandates while the general public is subjected to "technotronic" surveillance.

social credit· mask mandates· hiv· blackrock· larry fink

2:27:50 It's the levels of social credit. No, it's not the actual social credit score on your phone that Klaus Schwab's pushing or that Justin Trudeau's announced with martial law in Canada, but it's the same idea. Vax required for indoor seating. Booster shot required for bar seating. Thank you. It's the new religion. Have you paid your indulgences? Oh, I got three shots. You only got two. That's not too fun, is it? You know, I'm better than you. When you're so unsuccessful in life that injecting yourself every few months with something gives you meaning, it's genuinely sad. Funny, but also sad. That's right. Here's another one. Just like a few weeks ago with Magic Johnson, the mayor of LA and the governor of the state didn't wear their masks and said, oh, we held our breath during it. Well, they got caught again, I guess, holding their breath.

2:28:48 Don't hold your breath if they ever tell the truth. Los Angeles has an indoor mask mandate. This is the mayor of Los Angeles, Eric Garcetti, the Super Bowl, he's indoors. He also is maskless. Do not ever take these people seriously. And folks are doing skywriting now. Unmask our kids. Absolutely. Oh, and they just showed some of the Hollywood elites. Go back to that video. Oh, they're better than us. They support all the tyranny, but they don't have to wear the mask or take the shots. But if you don't, well, you're going to starve to death and go to jail. You're not like P. Diddy or 50 Cent or Matt Damon, all a bunch of wannabe elitists sitting around feeling powerful like LeBron James, like, you know, you're part of the winning crew now, says Ben Affleck. And again, I'm not mad at all these people. A lot of them are actually anti-mask.

2:29:49 Continuing, I comply because I want it to end. The woman says to her, it's because you comply that it will never end. Absolutely. What does Zbigniew Brzezinski say? The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more Controlled society such as society would be dominated by the elite Unrestricted by traditional values soon It will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files getting every and even the most personal information about the citizen these files will be subjected to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities between two ages 1970 and it goes on the child swim meets telling them that

2:30:39 If you don't have all the shots, we don't check your passport, you can't be part of the swim team. 50 million doses of vaccine recalled for causing false HIV positives. It's not false HIV positives. And this is the next big story. This is confirmed by medical doctors and people I've talked to that are about to come on air. And of course, the discoverer of HIV said it. Hi, Katina, Tatia. I hope you don't mind messaging you here about the recent HIV article you shared. It was an InfoWars article. I don't think I can comment publicly about it, thank you regulated profession medical worker, but myself and colleagues are starting to see AIDS-like conditions in our practices, mouth sores, skin sores, night sweats, tonsillitis, that doesn't respond to antibiotics, dramatic weight loss, bloodshot eyes. When these people go to hospital, they're being told that, quote, their immune systems are shot, close quote, and the doctors don't really know

2:31:39 What to do about it apart from try different medication. One of my patients with this told the consultant they were hadn't felt right after the second dose and suddenly the testing was a lot more and it goes on. We're only seeing this sort of thing in the vaxxed people. This is what someone just popped this into my local Stand in the park group because you know, you got to do stuff privately and secret messages now not allowed to talk I mean after all we're being watched by all the authorities that we take our shots do what we're told and Get sick and die after all. I mean the head of Blackrock. Mr. Fink Larry Fink is the depopulationist and he it's his earth. He took it over you need to die You're obsolete

2:32:40 And he knows you will. He's better than you. He knows he's gonna win. He knows you'll submit. He knows you'll give your children shots when they're dying of HIV type and stuff. You'll get attention for it and, you know, do marathons to raise money for him, but you won't actually stop it. No. He knows you'll roll over to him. He knows that you are his prey. Dad, why are they called boosters? Because they booth profits for big pharma, son. We want only vaccinated tenants in our vaccinated community. that replaces. We only want white tenants for our white community. And this is definitely all about that COVID stand discrimination. Gotta say no to Fauci.

2:33:30 And it goes on and on and on. You know, I meant to play this video. Maybe when we come in with this Putin interview, I want to air. You actually hear what he had to say a few weeks ago. Now they pull the Russian troops off their own border. I want to play this guy where he explains you are now listed in the social credit score for punishment. Yes. Meanwhile, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, test positive for COVID-19 despite being triple jabbed and The future king of England, he's sick too. What a load of crap. If you think they took that, I got a bridge. I want to sell you. Then there's this video. I should have led the show with this. Biden declares personal freedom doesn't exist and comes second to COVID mandates. That's what tyrants always do. They claim there's some group right, then they take your personal rights, and then you find out you're in a total death camp.

2:34:20 Vox reports, no handshakes please. The tech industry is terrified of the coronavirus. So drag queen story time can happen with your kids. They can teach your kids to take Prozac and Ritalin, but, and in California you can legally give somebody AIDS knowingly, that's HIV, or hepatitis knowingly, but you can't shake hands. That is a crime. But don't worry, there's massive exploding HIV diagnoses now. Be sure and take the shot. So I've got Chrissy Lee's report coming up. I've got this very important Putin thing. They call it Putin propaganda if you hear from Putin. No, I just think you're never supposed to actually hear from the Russians. So we're supposed to have nuclear war with them and all die. I thought we might actually hear what these devils are saying. That's not being a Russian agent to actually hear what people say. I'm an American agent of Christ. I'm a guy that loves America and I'm loyal to my country, but I'm an agent of Jesus Christ. Want to know who I am? That's who I am. All right, God bless you all. We'll be right back.

CHAPTER 29 / 33 Discussion

Vladimir Putin Interview Reprise, NATO Waves of Expansion

A second airing of the Vladimir Putin interview emphasizes his claim that the West "fooled" Russia by expanding NATO five times since 1990. Putin discusses the presence of US intelligence experts at Russian nuclear sites in the 1990s and asks why the West continued to treat Russia as an enemy. He asserts that Russia is merely protecting its own security in the face of encroaching attack systems.

vladimir putin· nato· cold war· us intelligence· security

2:35:17 You have said, talked a lot about security guarantees and now we've seen your proposals. You also say you have no intention of invading Ukraine. So will you guarantee unconditionally that you will not invade Ukraine or any other sovereign country? Or does that depend on how negotiations go? And another question, what is it do you think that the West does not understand about Russia or about your intentions? Thank you. Speaking of the security guarantees and what it will depend upon or if something will depend upon the negotiations, our actions will not depend on the negotiation. They will depend on the unconditional compliance with the Russian security demands today and in historical context. In this sense, we have made it clear that any further NATO movement to the east is unacceptable.

2:36:13 There's nothing unclear about this. We are not deploying our missiles over at the borders of the US. No. On the other hand, the US is deploying its missiles close to our home, on the porch of our house. So, are we demanding something excessive? We're simply asking them not to deploy their attack systems over at our home. What is so unusual or peculiar about that? So, what would the Americans think if we, for example, decided to come to the border between, say, Canada and the United States or Mexico and simply deploy our missiles over there? Well, does... did Mexico and the US never have any territorial disputes? What about California? What about Texas?

2:37:06 Did you forget about that? But everything seems to have calmed down. Nobody remembers those things just like the way they remember about Crimea. We try not to remember the situation in Ukraine. Who created that? Who started the crisis? Was it Lenin? Yes. When he declared the Soviet Union in 1922 and then the Constitution of 1924 following his death, was following the principles of Lenin. This is a matter of security, not just history. This is about security. It is not the negotiations that matter. It is the outcome, the result. I've reiterated this many times, and you're well aware that

2:37:53 We said, not an inch to the east. That was a NATO guarantee in 1990. So what became of that? They fooled us. We've seen five waves of NATO expansion. Now they're in Romania and in Poland, and they're deploying the relevant attack systems over there. That's what we're talking about. You should finally understand we're not threatening anyone. We did not come to the US borders or to the UK borders. No. They came to our borders and now they're saying that Ukraine will also join NATO and they will deploy their systems there. Or not just NATO, they will simply deploy it on a bilateral basis. They will deploy their military bases and their attack systems. That's what we're talking about. And you keep demanding some guarantees from us. You must give us the guarantees. It is up to you. And you must do this immediately, right now, instead of keep talking about this for decades.

2:38:56 And use this small talk and soft talk about the need for guarantees of security for everyone. This is exactly what we mean. We are not threatening anybody. And now to the second part of your question. Could you repeat that, please? What is it that you think that the West does not understand about Russia or about your intentions? Yes, exactly. Well, you know, what you understand or what you don't understand, sometimes it seems to me that we live in two different worlds. I was speaking about very obvious things. How can you not understand that? You say you will not expand and then you keep expanding.

2:39:39 You say we will have equal guarantees for everyone on the number of international agreements. And then we see there is no equality or no equal security. See, here's the thing. Back in 1918, one of the assistants of Woodrow Wilson, the US president, said that the whole world would feel calmer and safer if today's enormous Russia would be replaced with the states of Siberia and four more states

2:40:17 in the European part of Russia. That was set in 1918, and in 1991 we separated into 12 separate parts. It seems to me that our partners were not satisfied with that. They think that Russia is a tad too large. Even the European countries have turned themselves into a union of states. There are quite small states with populations of 60 to 80 million people, but even after the desolation of the Soviet Union we only had 146 million people and that is too much for the West. I think that is the only explanation for their constant pressure against us back in the 1990s.

2:41:01 The Soviet Union did everything it could to build normal relations with the West, with the United States. I will keep saying this and I will repeat for your viewers and listeners out there from the media that you represent, I didn't quite get that, but that doesn't matter. Our nuclear sites our military nuclear sites had experts from the US intelligence authorities. They were going there. That was their job, to visit the Russian military nuclear sites. They spent their whole days over there. And the Russian government had advisors from

2:41:40 The CIA working inside of it. What else did you need? Why did you have to support the terrorists in Northern Caucasus and use the terrorist organizations to reach your goals and break down the Russian Federation? This was exactly what you were doing. And as a former director of the FSB, I know that. We were working with the double agents and they were reporting to us on the tasks of the Western intelligence agencies. Why did you have to do that? You should have done something different, perhaps treat Russia as a possible ally and strengthen trust. But no, instead you tried to keep breaking us up.

2:42:21 And then you started the NATO expansion to the east. We were saying, don't do that. You had promised you wouldn't. And they say, where is it put in written form? Nowhere. Well, then laugh off and we don't care about your concerns. And every time we kept responding and trying to make obstacles, we were expressing our concerns about that. But they say no. You can do whatever you want about your concerns. We will do whatever we need. One, two, three, four, five. We witnessed five waves of NATO expansion. Why can't they understand? What is unclear? I believe everything is clear. We are thinking about our own security.

CHAPTER 30 / 33 Discussion

V for Vendetta Monologue, Fear and Conformity

A monologue from the film *V for Vendetta* is played, illustrating how fear of war, terror, and disease can lead a population to surrender their freedom for the promise of order. The speech highlights the role of surveillance and censorship in coercing conformity. It serves as a metaphorical warning about the current state of global politics and the rise of authoritarian leaders.

v for vendetta· propaganda· surveillance· conformity· adam sutler

2:43:05 There are of course those who do not want us to speak. We think just let me think. Even now orders are being shouts into telephones and men with guns will soon be on their way. It's Chancellor Suttler. Damn it! Why? Because while the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning and for those who will listen the enunciation of truth. Stop it please! Stop it! The truth is there is something terribly wrong with this country, isn't there? You decided, sir. You wanted it foolproof. You told me every television in London! Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression.

2:43:46 And where once you had the freedom to object, think and speak as you saw fit, you now have sensors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and selecting your submission. How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well, certainly there are those who are more responsible than others. They will be held accountable. But again, truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror. I know why you did it. I know you were afraid. Who wouldn't be? War, terror, disease. There were a myriad of problems which conspired to corrupt your reason and rob you of your common sense. Fear got the best of you. And in your panic, you turned to the now High Chancellor, Adam Sutler. He promised you order, he promised you peace. And all he demanded in return was your silent, obedient consent.

CHAPTER 31 / 33 Discussion

Grace Schara Case, Hospital Protocol and DNR Allegations

The father of Grace Schara recounts the events leading to his daughter's death in a hospital, alleging that restrictive COVID-19 protocols and improper medication led to her demise. He claims the hospital administered a combination of Precedex, Lorazepam, and Morphine against package warnings. He further alleges that a "Do Not Resuscitate" (DNR) order was placed on his daughter without family consent, leading to her death while they watched on FaceTime.

grace schara· covid-19· hospital protocol· morphine· dnr

2:44:43 There is a war. It's happening now. It will decide the fate of humanity. The time to choose sides has come. We are the resistance. We are the InfoWar. Take me through what happened. Did she have COVID and was taken to the hospital or what happened that day? We had tested Grace for COVID and she was tested positive on October 1st at home. We really didn't think anything of it because we were following the frontline doctor's protocol to a T. What happened was, is day eight or nine, somewhere in there, she couldn't maintain her oxygen above 90% saturation. They said, we want to admit Grace to the hospital. I said, well then I'll be staying with her. And they said, well, you can't. I said, well, what do you mean I can't?

2:45:38 And they said, well, our hospital protocol doesn't allow you to stay in the room. I said, well, then I'll be taking Grace home. And unfortunately, they came back. I say unfortunately because Grace died, but unfortunately, they came back two hours later and said, well, we decided you can stay as long as you don't leave the room. And so I said, well, that's of course fine. I mean, I'm not going anywhere with the full expectation I was going to catch COVID from Grace. That evening, so this was the evening of October 7th, we had a little bit of an issue in that Grace was starting to get frustrated with the high flow nasal cannula. They put this cannula on her that was shooting air up her nostrils at

2:46:22 a high rate of pressure and she didn't want that. So then we worked, I worked with the nurses and the respiratory therapists on getting a BiPAP map to fix that problem. And ultimately it took about three and a half hours on and off and we finally got it situated. So the morning of October 8th, A doctor came in at 8 o'clock and said, your daughter's going to need to be on a ventilator in the next two hours. And I said, what is that based on? And he said it's based on the blood gas numbers that they drew the night before. I said, what time did you draw them? He said 1130. So we just got done wrestling with Grace on and off for three and a half, four hours. I said, I don't think those numbers are accurate. Her blood pressure was 235 over 135. Her heart rate was 150 beats per minute. I said that you guys took it at the worst possible times. I said, I'd like to have those numbers.

2:47:19 taken again. And so they took them at my request and she was of course fine. So we dodged the ventilator bullet. The next day, October 9th, was another fairly significant event. Grace was great. She got up. She was pretty hungry, didn't eat much the day before. And so I ordered food, started feeding her, and the nurse came running in and said, you can't do that. I said, well, what's the reason? And she said, well, because Grace's oxygen saturation is only at 85%. Remember I told you I had my oxygen saturation meter, so I put it on her finger and it read 95%. So I called the nurse and I said, is my meter accurate? She said, yes. I said, well, why is my $50 meter more accurate than your $50,000 meter?

2:48:08 and she said, well, those leads get sweaty. And so these type of things happen. I said, you gotta be kidding me. I said, if you know that, why don't you just trade these leads out every four hours or whatever it takes so that you have an accurate reading. This is the single most important statistic that you are using to manage my daughter's care and she snottily responded, you should just be thankful you caught this. She's on 1.4 units of Presidex. They give her two doses of lorazepam three minutes apart. It may have to be a mistake. I'm guessing. I don't know. Then at 615,

2:48:46 They give her two milligrams of morphine as a IV push, which means they gave it to her instantly, not as a drip. The morphine package insert is so condemning to what they did. It says to not do this specifically. Don't combine it with Presidex or Orazepam because it causes death. Jessica now, Jessica's in the room as the advocate. At 720, she calls us panicking because Grace's numbers are just dropping. And so Jeff, my wife and I are on FaceTime saying, get the nurses in. She said, dad, I can't get them in. They won't come in. So now we're hollering, save our daughter. And they holler back, she's DNR, do not resuscitate. That's the first we know she's been a part. This is so sick. So ultimately, seven minutes go by, we watched Grace die on FaceTime at 727 that evening.

CHAPTER 32 / 33 Discussion

John Bowne Report Reprise, China and Agenda 2030

The John Bowne report on China is replayed, detailing the "brutal spectacle" of the Beijing Olympics amidst ongoing human rights abuses. The report reiterates claims of forced organ harvesting and the imprisonment of Christians and Uyghurs. It concludes by warning that Western civilization is being toppled in favor of a New World Order plan scheduled for completion by 2030.

china· uyghurs· organ harvesting· beijing olympics· agenda 2030

2:49:48 I The 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing will one day be written in the history books as they parade celebrating the point at which the United States lost its ability to perceive reality and embrace the impending doom brought on by the selling out of its most powerful assets by a self-serving treasonous elite class of baby boomer, politicians and economic prostitutes. I would say to our athletes You're there to compete. Do not risk incurring the anger of the Chinese government because they are ruthless. I know there is a temptation on the part of some to speak out while they are there. I respect that, but I also worry about what the Chinese government might do.

2:50:40 to their reputations, to their families. And nobody cares about what's happening to the Uyghurs, okay? You bring it up because you really care. What? What do you mean nobody cares? The rest of us don't care. I'm just telling you a very hard... You really don't care? Wait, you're saying you personally don't care? I'm telling you a very hard, ugly truth, okay? Of all the things that I care about, yes, it is below my line. The irony of statements like these is that the very CCP tyranny they either ignore or bow down to is already in the United States. as those rightfully exercising their First Amendment still await the communist-style circus of the January 6th Committee. You can't lock up a whole group of people and somehow identify them as terrorists in advance. A terror event on your own people to prevent terrorism, that doesn't make sense. And we won't ignore what our intelligence agency has determined to be the most lethal terrorist threat to the homeland today. White supremacy is terrorism.

2:51:38 If you aren't up to speed, China's policy of mass genocide is skyrocketing. After killing a reported 1.2 million Tibetans... The Chinese army continued its progress towards Lhasa in a peaceful march that the Chinese news broadcast to their people. It was with more curiosity than animosity that the Tibetan population, isolated from the world for centuries, watched the arrival of these strange invaders posing as liberators. And imprisoning two million Uyghurs in the largest network of forced labor detention camps on the face of the earth. These satellite images show the site where Terseny says she was held, sharing a cell with 13 other women with a bucket for a toilet. And she's haunted by one image.

2:52:28 Masked men coming down a camp corridor like this one after midnight. There were three men. Not one, but three. They did whatever evil their mind could think of, and they didn't spare any part of my body, fighting it to the extent that it was disgusting to look at. And imprisoning 5,000 Christians, including 1,000 Christian leaders, not to mention a myriad of horrific human rights abuses against the Chinese people, including forced abortion, sterilization and organ extractions.

2:53:07 For over a decade, the People's Republic of China has stood publicly accused of acts of cruelty and wickedness that match the cruelty and wickedness of medieval torturers and executioners. It's stated with certainty that in China, forced organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience has been practiced for a substantial period of time. The report underscored that there were extraordinarily short waiting times for organs to be available for transplantation and numerous websites advertised hearts, lungs and kidneys for sale, suggesting an on-demand industry.

2:53:51 The Olympics themselves have been a historic ratings disaster, but NBC keeps on pushing their departure from compassion, common sense, and moral courage into the homes of any American gullible enough to sit transfixed by the brutal spectacle that is less than a decade away from having a hand in toppling Western civilization under the New World Order plan known as Agenda 2030. John Bowne reporting. The globalists are bombarding us with propaganda and with spiritual warfare and with poisons and chemicals added to the foods. It's all come out. And they're doing that not because we're weak, but because we're made in the image of God, the creator, and we are powerful. And the social engineers fear that so much. So that's why I repeat that famous internet saying that nobody knows who first came up with, but boy, is it true.

CHAPTER 33 / 33 Discussion

COVIDland Part 2, Impact of Masks on Children

A listener calls in to praise the documentary *COVIDland Part 2: The Mask*, focusing on the psychological and physical impact of masking children in schools. The segment argues that masks are used to "subjugate the human spirit" and turn people into "expressionless animals." It concludes with a call to stop the forced masking of young children, which is described as a "slippery slope" toward total submission.

covidland· masks· children· subjugation· psychological impact

2:58:27 Let's go to Michael calling in from Mississippi. Michael, you're on the InfoWars War Room. Go ahead. Hey Owen, it's truly an honor to speak to you. So quick product plug. I just wanted to plug COVIDland Part 2, the mask. If people are still on the verge of getting it, get it. Get it, share it, post it, whatever. Because I mean, I watched the first one. First one was great. Second one, I mean, me and my wife were literally in tears when it went over. The impact on the children, I mean it's just, it's very powerful. When I started hearing the schools start talking about putting children in masks in order to be able to go back to school, I thought it was a joke. I thought who in their right mind would put a mask on a child? Mask on children is quite the slippery slope. Look at your children.

2:59:22 They're confused. They come home lethargic. They're frustrated. You may see variances in their mood. It's because when you are wearing a mask, it makes you tired. We elected the five of you. We chose you to make difficult decisions for our children. We chose you to make decisions that would be in our children's best interest, and forcing five, six, seven, eight, and nine-year-old little children to cover their noses and their mouths where they breathe for seven hours a day, every day for the last nine months for a virus that you know doesn't affect them. That is not in their best interest. And this has to stop.

3:00:01 The mask has been used for millennia to subjugate the human spirit. It hides the endlessly changing expressions that allow us to express our emotions and empathize with one another. The mask becomes our only expression. It is fixed and unchanging. This is the purpose of the mask, to turn us into expressionless animals and submissive slaves.