Friday, 3 March 2023

Deep State Goes ALL IN on Jan 6 Psyop as Lies on Ukraine, Covid, Economy Fail to Control the Masses – FULL SHOW 3/3/23

Federal agencies pivot to targeting domestic dissent as the official narratives on Ukraine, the Wuhan lab leak, and vaccine efficacy continue to disintegrate under public scrutiny.

By The Alex Jones Show | 2h 58m listen | 49 chapters
Deep State Goes ALL IN on Jan 6 Psyop as Lies on Ukraine, Covid, Economy Fail to Control the Masses – FULL SHOW 3/3/23 cover

About this episode

The Department of Justice and FBI are preparing a domestic crackdown on anti-war Americans, labeling critics of the Ukraine conflict as Russian assets and spies. Attorney General Merrick Garland faces intense scrutiny for allegedly overruling FBI agents to authorize the Mar-a-Lago raid while simultaneously ignoring evidence of Biden family foreign influence. These maneuvers coincide with a massive media reversal on the Wuhan lab leak theory, a shift framed as a tactical distraction from emerging corruption allegations.

Journalist Ann Applebaum and former DHS official Nina Jankowicz are spearheading a legal and propaganda offensive against independent media, with Jankowicz filing a lawsuit against Fox News. In Tennessee, Governor Bill Lee signed legislation banning drag queen story time and youth gender surgeries, prompting a defensive response from California Governor Gavin Newsom. Meanwhile, attorney Bob Barnes provides updates on the Brooke Jackson whistleblower case, alleging that Pfizer committed massive shareholder fraud and violated its federal contract by failing to deliver a vaccine that prevents transmission. Reports from East Palestine, Ohio, indicate a worsening health crisis as residents suffer from migraines and nausea following the Norfolk Southern derailment, even as the EPA pauses cleanup efforts.

Podcasters Joe Rogan and Russell Brand recently defended Alex Jones, noting his decades-long track record of being ahead of the news cycle on social credit scores and government narratives. Reporter Savannah Hernandez confronted Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg over his absence from disaster zones, signaling an end to traditional media decorum. Despite corporate censorship, the independent media movement continues to expand through platforms like Rumble and the persistent support of the InfoWars audience.


CHAPTER 01 / 49 Discussion

Wuhan Lab Leak Theory, Media Censorship and Biden Family Allegations

Mainstream media outlets and politicians are criticized for previously labeling the Wuhan lab leak theory as disinformation and racism. Questions are raised regarding the timing of the media's reversal, suggesting it may be a distraction from Joe Biden's alleged criminal enterprises and foreign influence. InfoWars is positioned as a "canary in the coal mine" for censorship that will eventually target the broader public.

wuhan lab leak· mainstream media· joe biden· hunter biden· infowars

00:00 InfoWars, tomorrow's news today. Now ladies, one of the biggest, ladies and gentlemen, one of the biggest stories this week has been how the Wuhan lab leak

00:43 Theory was actually correct and the mainstream media that told you that was disinformation Told you not to share that not to spread that would censor you ban you if you did all the American news outlets politicians saying no it did not come from a laboratory and in fact that's racist for you to say that and Trump is a racist for him to say that and of course they were wrong and Now, why are they talking about this now? Is it because China is getting involved with Russia going into Ukraine? Is it because Joe Biden and his family have been caught in many of their criminal enterprises laundering money, 10% for the big guy, foreign influence, blackmail, bribery. He just sent a guy to jail who exposed it. You didn't hear about that, did you? I mean, you don't know his name. I think it was Galt. I covered it yesterday. I already forgot the guy's name.

01:44 Because they're not talking about it 24-7 on the news. But yeah, a guy that showed Biden's potential foreign business dealings being criminal, Biden had him arrested. Isn't that something? And that's a theme, by the way, that we're gonna have today. Because InfoWars is the canary in the coal mine. So what they do to Alex Jones, what they do to InfoWars, eventually they'll do to everybody else. But that'll be the theme ongoing. But I wanna play a clip for you from April 2022.

CHAPTER 02 / 49 Discussion

Ann Applebaum, Hunter Biden Laptop and Media Propaganda

Journalist Ann Applebaum is accused of spreading state-sponsored propaganda regarding the war in Ukraine and the Hunter Biden laptop story. During a Q&A session at the University of Chicago in April 2022, Applebaum dismissed the laptop story as irrelevant to the presidency despite its confirmation by the New York Times. The dismissal is framed as a deliberate attempt by the media to censor information that 16% of Biden voters claimed would have changed their vote.

ann applebaum· hunter biden· the atlantic· university of chicago· propaganda

02:21 from Ann Applebaum. You want to know how propaganda works, folks? This is how it works right here. You want to know how the leftist ideology justifies it? This is all right here. Now today, Ann Applebaum is out supporting the war in Ukraine. Supporting the war propaganda for the Atlantic just like she always does state-sponsored State-run propaganda from an Apple bomb, but if you want to know how it all works listen to what she said in April 2022 After they all told us the hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation remember that they told you the hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation same people that told you that COVID-19 did not come out of a Wuhan laboratory. Same people that told you that told you Hunter Biden's laptop was disinformation, they lied. And here was Ann Applebaum addressing that lie during a question and answer session. Listen to what she says here, it tells you everything.

03:19 So amazing, thank you. Thank you for doing this really appreciate it. I'm Daniel Schmidt. I'm a freshman at the University of Chicago My question is for miss Applebaum So in 2020 you wrote those who live outside the Fox News bubble do not of course need to learn any of the stuff about Hunter Biden referring to his laptop, of course A poll later after that found that if voters knew about the content of the laptop, 16% of Joe Biden voters would have acted differently. Now, of course, we know a few weeks ago, the New York Times confirmed that the content is real. Do you think the media acted inappropriately when they instantly dismissed Hunter Biden's laptop as Russian disinformation? And what can we learn from that in ensuring that what we label as disinformation is truly disinformation and not reality?

04:03 My problem with Hunter Biden's laptop is I think totally irrelevant. I mean, it's not whether it's disinformation or... I mean, I don't think the Hunter Biden's business relationships have anything to do with who should be president of the United States. So I don't find it to be interesting. I mean, that would be my problem with that as a major news story. Yeah, you didn't answer the question though, did you? And notice what you said. Well, it's not about disinformation. It was about it was irrelevant. No, it was about it being disinformation. That's what we were told to. That was the lie. That was the point. But see, but there's their attitude. Well, we don't think the Hunter Biden laptop story is relevant, so we're just gonna censor it and make sure nobody sees it. Well, 60% of voters that voted for Biden thought it was relevant. So why do you get to decide for them too? You know, I gotta tell you, it's a real shame that Alex isn't on here right now with us because the theme for today, a lot of the theme for today is going to be how you're not wasting your time here.

CHAPTER 03 / 49 Discussion

Joe Rogan and Russell Brand Discuss Alex Jones

Podcasters Joe Rogan and Russell Brand discussed Alex Jones and the phenomenon of mainstream media dishonesty during a recent episode. The conversation highlighted how Jones has been "ahead of the curve" for decades regarding news cycles and government narratives. The segment also touches on the "lawfare" being launched against conservative outlets like Fox News, comparing it to the legal battles faced by InfoWars.

joe rogan· russell brand· alex jones· podcasting· mainstream media

05:12 Are you tuned in every day now to find out how the world really works? Are you sharing these links to the live streams and the reports at Banned Out Video with your friends and family so that they can find out how the world really works? Are you part of the information war yet? Are you becoming a modern-day Paul Revere yet? It's not the are you entertained from the gladiator, it's are you not informed? Do you not understand how the world works? Are you not seeing around the corner when you tune in here every day? Of course you are. That's why you're here. And that's why the tyrants want it shut down. They want that vision around the corner. They don't want you to know so that they can take advantage and leverage it. But that's why we're here. But why do I say I wish Alex was here? Because

06:14 On the Joe Rogan podcast with Russell Brand yesterday, which probably is his biggest of the year, I would say Two heavyweights in podcasting right now, Rogan and Brand One of their topics of discussion was Alex Jones, and it wasn't even necessarily Alex Jones It's just that the phenomenon of the mainstream media lying to you about everything and then now It used to be next decade's news today or maybe next year's news today. Now it's like, I mean, the spiral, the velocity of the news cycle moves so fast now, is so tight now where it's just like a couple months or a couple days. So they're discussing that, how Alex was ahead of that curve and has been for decades. And look at what Alex and us, you in the audience, look at what we've built here, the mothership of information and human intelligence.

07:18 for the people, by the people, all of us together. And there were a couple news stories today that it was like that same phenomenon where we talked about it on Tuesday, on Wednesday, on Thursday, and now here we are Friday and boom, they're now saying it in the mainstream news. All kinds of different examples from what's going on in Ukraine to now the law fair that's about to be launched against Fox News and any other big conservative outlet till they can crush you. Just like they did to Infowars and Alex Jones. And they brag about it now. They don't even hide it. Or maybe we could look over here. You know, two Democrat senators are hospitalized right now. Yeah, can't do their job. Dianne Feinstein and John Fetterman. Hope they're getting better. But right now it's not good. They're not there. They're in the hospital. And Fetterman is somehow co-sponsoring bills.

CHAPTER 04 / 49 Discussion

Tennessee Legislation Banning Drag Queen Story Time and Youth Surgeries

Tennessee has signed a bill banning drag queen story time for children and prohibiting transgender surgeries for youth. The legislative move is celebrated as a victory for "good people" in government responding to public pressure. The host notes that InfoWars and local reporters will continue to follow up on the enforcement of these new laws.

tennessee· drag queen story time· transgender youth· legislation· bill signing

08:33 The Republicans have demanded proof of life. And the only proof that has been offered is a co-sponsorship of a bill, which they're doubting the legitimacy of, as they should. Even Newsweek has an issue with that. But how about this? I felt some relief because after we had the CPS segment yesterday, that was probably the biggest

09:13 part of that show yesterday, got shared a lot that moment. In Tennessee, they signed a bill banning drag queen story time for kids and other such things. And I was on the phone with another local reporter talking about following up on this thinking kind of like how it normally is like, hey, if we don't push the gas on this thing, and if we don't apply the pressure on this thing and stress test this thing all the way, No one else will, cuz that's how it's been here for Alex Jones and Infowars for so long. And then one of the biggest stories, Tennessee bill banning transgender story time, banning trans youth surgeries. And while I'm still gonna do the follow up reporting with this other local reporter here on the issue, it was just such a sense of relief. It's like we really do have good people now that are in the government and are doing the right things that need to be done. It's really happening.

CHAPTER 05 / 49 Discussion

Infrastructure Collapse, Urban Crime and Democrat Governance

Recent incidents of urban decay and violence are cited, including a building collapse in Baltimore following a police chase and an execution-style shooting in St. Louis. These events are framed as the result of decades of Democrat governance in major U.S. cities. The host argues that the literal collapse of buildings and trains reflects a deeper systemic failure in "Biden's America."

baltimore· st. louis· infrastructure· crime· democrat party

10:22 And granted, we're playing from behind and with a shortened deck, but we're coming on fast and we're much more skilled and agile than our enemy. They're just a brute force. So we'll be covering that today as well. You've got infrastructure collapsing all around you. A stunning video. And you kind of, again, you're getting this stuff every day, every week. Whether it is a man getting shot execution style in the streets of St. Louis in broad daylight with people filming it, just that kind of unreal scenery in our cities. There was a police chase in Baltimore last night. Cars get out of control, skid into a building, and the building collapses on the vehicles. Baltimore, we know who runs Baltimore, don't we?

11:38 We know the old party that runs Baltimore and has for so long, that's wild stuff. And it's every day, whether it's a massive structure fire, an explosion, a train derailment, plane crash, processing plants, facilities for food, for metal, for energy, it's just every day. And sure, we can sit here and say this is Biden's America and that's fair, but it's much deeper than that.

12:17 This problem has been building beneath the surface, but really not even beneath the surface. We've been watching this happen in front of our eyes for decades. We've been watching this. We've been watching US inner cities crumble and collapse right before our very eyes for decades. And now it's just reached the point where it's literally collapsing on top of you. The building is literally on fire, blowing up. The trains are off the tracks. So sure, this is Biden's America, this is Democrat America. And they can try to distract like Gavin Newsom does, responding to the bill in Tennessee saying, Tennessee has the eighth highest murder rate in the nation. Well, that's funny because we can

CHAPTER 06 / 49 Discussion

Gavin Newsom Criticizes Tennessee Murder Rates

California Governor Gavin Newsom's criticism of Tennessee's murder rate is dismissed by pointing out that the high crime statistics are driven by Memphis, a city run by Democrats. The segment serves as a transition to upcoming legal news regarding vaccine issues and further discussion on Tennessee's ban on "tranny story time."

gavin newsom· tennessee· memphis· murder rate· democrats

13:14 investigate that and find out that the reason why Tennessee has the eighth highest murder rate is because of Memphis, which is run by Democrats. Should I remind Gavin Newsom of that? And we do have Bob Barnes coming up in the third hour today with big news on the legal front with the vaccine issue. And I also want to cover these bills banning the tranny story time for kids. And the chop, the weenie chop for little boys that the liberal progressive Democrats want, they'd probably mandate it if they could. So all of that coming up on the Alex Jones Show. But are you not informed? Are you not tuned in here to find out how the world really works? See, some people don't want you to know how the world really works. That way they can beat you at the game of life and take advantage of you and manipulate and deceive you.

14:15 And we don't want that to happen to you. And that's why they want to shut down. And that's why your support at Infowarsstore.com is paramount. We'll be right back. Have you not been informed? I feel like we are having our gladiatorial moment in the media landscape right now. Have you not been informed? On this Friday, March 3rd, 2023 Alex Jones show transmission, Owen Troy filling in. Have you not been informed? I feel that this truly is the Info Wars gladiator moment. In the middle of the arena, been stabbed, been spit on, been lied about, been set up, been framed, been sabotaged. Standing in the middle of the arena saying, have you not been informed?

CHAPTER 08 / 49 Discussion

Ukraine War Devastation and BlackRock Rebuilding Contracts

The war in Ukraine is described as a humanitarian catastrophe with hundreds of thousands of casualties that the U.S. government is allegedly misrepresenting. A theory is proposed that the Biden administration is allowing Ukraine to be destroyed so that BlackRock can eventually receive hundreds of billions in taxpayer-funded contracts to rebuild the country. The host predicts Russia will reach the Dnipro River by next year, leading to Zelensky's eventual removal.

ukraine· russia· blackrock· volodymyr zelensky· military aid

19:02 from the Council on Foreign Relations. How much aid has the US sent Ukraine? Here are six charts. We'll go through those charts. We'll go through those charts. But I'm going to tell you, I don't know how they're going to keep this under wraps. Folks, Ukraine is being devastated right now. Devastated. And I mean, it's impossible to know specific details because I know we can't trust the mainstream news. I don't trust the US government. But it looks like at this point, probably hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians have died. Maybe tens of thousands of Russians. Again, the numbers, it's hard to get real specific numbers or good details. But that's what it's looking like. And we're talking about entire Ukrainian cities destroyed. And you've got to wonder who's organizing this Ukrainian army, putting their troops

20:07 putting their military operations in the middle of critical infrastructure zones and residence zones and community center areas, and the Russians just come and mop it all up, and then there's nothing left. And you know what is even sicker about this? And this is why I think at this point my analysis would be Russia is eventually gonna, they're gonna get to the Dnipro River probably next year.

20:43 I mean, it looks like they're accelerating, but I'm still probably thinking next year is when the next big development happens. And they'll basically give Zelensky one last out to say resign, remove from power, and we're gonna have an election. And then they'll have an election and then a pro-Russian president will be elected. I mean, that'd be the most peaceful route when it gets to that point, or they can try to get a larger war with Ukraine going. But I don't think that's what the Biden administration actually wants. What I think is gonna happen After Ukraine has been properly destroyed, which is what's gonna happen, after Ukraine has been properly destroyed, BlackRock is gonna come in and get $300 billion to rebuild Ukraine of your money. See how it all works? The weapon manufacturers and contractors get paid, the Ukrainian assets and rat holes get funded,

21:49 And then at the bottom line, BlackRock, the biggest group, the biggest funding group on the planet, gets to come in and gets the $100 billion contracts to rebuild Ukraine. That's what's gonna happen. So we've got more instances of the theme of the day. Alex Jones was right. And other news stories coming up, don't go anywhere. What is the American media leaving out of the Ukraine story? What are they not telling you?

CHAPTER 09 / 49 Discussion

DOJ Targeting of Anti-War Americans as Russian Assets

A warning is issued that the Department of Justice and FBI may soon begin arresting Americans who oppose the war in Ukraine, labeling them "Russian assets" or "spies." This predicted crackdown is compared to the treatment of January 6th defendants. The host suggests that if Democrats win in 2024, criticizing Zelensky will become a "high risk" activity leading to imprisonment.

department of justice· fbi· russian assets· political persecution· gulags

22:26 What are they getting wrong and why? Well, they're not reporting how devastated Ukraine is right now. They're not devastated the massive destruction of Ukraine. They're not properly covering the massive amount of death that's happened in this war. They're not properly covering the amount of support this war is getting. They want you to think this is a popular war backed by Europe, backed by other countries. It's not. It's not. And they want you to think that you need to be concerned about Ukraine's border and you need to think Vladimir Putin and Russia is the bad guy that we are going after and saving Ukraine from, which is not accurate either. And I don't know if we're quite there yet, but I've been around long enough and I've been the target of censorship, political persecution, and prison enough to know

23:32 what my enemy has planned for me next. And so depending on how this all goes, and I think at this point I'm convinced that they're just gonna let Russia probably take Ukraine, destroy Ukraine, and then BlackRock come in and build it all up. But if this thing gets more serious, and instead of letting Zelensky resign or flying him out of there or saving his ass in about a year from now, and they decide to ramp it up, they will start the Department of Justice, if it's still run by Democrats that is, if you still have a Democrat or controlled opposition in the White House, a controlled asset in the White House, the Department of Justice, the FBI and others will start rounding up people that they call Russian assets, Russian spies, what have you. And none of it will be accurate. It won't be people that are Russian anything.

24:30 It'll just be Americans that don't support the war, and they'll start rounding them up, arresting them, and throwing them in gulags. So we're not quite there yet, but I see that around the corner, 100% being the case. So right now it's like low risk level to cover this war accurately. A year from now might be moderate risk. And then if another Democrat or Biden wins again in 2024, it will be high risk to cover the war in Ukraine and not be fully on board for it and supporting Zelensky. You'll be arrested and called a Russian asset is where I see that going. You think that's crazy? They still have veterans, doctors, parents rotting in jail cells for walking on grass or walking through velvet ropes at the Capitol. Years of jail time. No, they'll lock up your ass 100% and throw away the key for political purposes. They don't care about you. Your life means nothing.

CHAPTER 10 / 49 Discussion

Council on Foreign Relations Charts on Ukraine Aid

Data from the Council on Foreign Relations is used to show that the vast majority of U.S. aid to Ukraine is military rather than humanitarian. Charts illustrate that U.S. spending in Ukraine dwarfs aid given to Israel and exceeds the combined contributions of all other NATO countries and EU institutions. The host argues this proves the war is not globally popular and that Ukraine is currently losing.

council on foreign relations· military aid· nato· ukraine· humanitarian aid

25:40 collateral damage to these tyrants. But let's look at these numbers because when you see it, I think the story hits a little harder. And this is the Council on Foreign Relations. I mean, I'm not telling you the be all end all of truth. But when it comes to a breakdown of the money being spent in Ukraine, I've not found a better resource with the illustrations than this from the Council on Foreign Relations. How much aid has the US sent Ukraine? Here are six charts. And let's just review these charts, shall we? Let's start with the first chart here. Now again, are these numbers accurate? It's hard to keep track of and the last time these numbers were updated, this chart that is, was January 15th.

26:40 So are these numbers accurate? I don't know. There's so much money being thrown over there and weapons and everything, we can't even keep track. There's no oversight, but this is what the Council on Foreign Relations is reporting as of January 15th. Now, what do you notice about this little bar graph that we have here where military aid is at 46.6 billion, financial aid is at 26.4 billion, and then what is that tiny little sliver at the top there? Humanitarian aid. Tiny little humanitarian aid. We'll give you a little bit. We'll pinch a little off the top for the people. So, I mean, you do the math. According to this, it's just shy of $100 billion and most of it is military aid. So, do you think if people saw this graph, they might change their mind?

27:45 So they're saying total 77 billion as of January 15th, and we know at least another billion has been sent since then. And the vast majority of that military, tiny little humanitarian, and then a little just financial, whatever that means. We're just sending them cash, I guess, so that they can pay their pensions, pay their military, and then the smallest little sliver so that they can have food and water. And the biggest being military. So the military-industrial complex, they're getting their cut. But you might say, well, how does that stack up though? How does that stack up with aid to other foreign countries? You know, we give plenty of military aid and we give plenty of aid out to other countries. How does it stack up? Maybe it's not much. Oh! Actually, it's quite a bit.

28:45 US military assistance to Ukraine since the invasion, compared with that to top recipients in 2020, Israel being the top at 3.3 billion. And here's Ukraine since the invasion, military aid, not all the aid, just military aid here, 46 billion. So how does that stack up with aid given to other countries? Well, you can stack them all up together and it still won't even see the top. Mm-hmm. What's really going on in Ukraine? But you might say, well, what about the rest of the world though? What about the rest of the world? What about the European countries, the NATO countries? Surely they're throwing tens of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars at the situation as well, right? I mean, let's level this out. Wrong-o. Wrong-o. Chart number three. Once again, stack up all the aid from every other country on Earth

29:49 plus the EU as a separate institution, and you still would not equal what the United States has given. Now is this a victory for capitalism? I'm just wondering for you liberal leftist Democrats out there that hate capitalism so much, but you love the war in Ukraine. How are you going to fund that war without that capitalism you hate so much? You ever thought of that? Kind of like how are you going to confiscate our guns without guns? But I'm digressing. So there it is. Nope. No, no, no, you're not getting the support from Europe. You're not getting the support from NATO and NATO countries. EU institutions, that's a nice little whatever that is. EU institutions are heavily supporting it out of Europe, but that's it. That's all you got. The United Kingdom actually supporting more than anybody else, which is odd. And then Poland in there. So, nope.

30:53 Nope, you're not getting the support from Europe. Nope, you're not getting the support from NATO. Nope, this war is not popular around the world. No, the world is not getting behind Ukraine. That is not the case. And no, Ukraine is not winning either. Ukraine is losing. Ukraine is being devastated. Ukraine is being destroyed at this rate if the war keeps up. You're gonna have probably at least half a million dead by next year when the Russians get to the Dnipro River and surround Kiev and probably offer Zelensky one last chance to stand down. That's if he's still there at that time, which he may decide to get out of there cuz that might be his last chance. That's what's really going on in Ukraine. Still support it? All right, I've got more on the situation in Ukraine, including a familiar name that's involved in all of this.

CHAPTER 11 / 49 Discussion

Western Media Integrity and the American Liberal "Linchpin"

The host asserts that the Western media and Biden administration cannot keep the truth about Ukraine hidden much longer. American liberals are described as the "linchpin" holding together the military-industrial complex and big pharma collusion. The segment claims liberals will never admit they were lied to about masks, the Hunter Biden laptop, or the Wuhan lab leak.

mainstream media· biden administration· propaganda· masks· lab leak

31:55 Very suspicious, very suspicious. Alex Vindman? Him again? Not him, no way. Yes way. I really don't know how the Western media, the Biden administration is gonna keep the story, the truth about what's going on in Ukraine under wraps much longer folks, I really don't. And depending on how aggressive or accelerationist Russia wants to be in this advancement,

32:33 Perhaps will be the ultimate determination. It's not going to be whether they decide to have integrity overnight or not. It's not going to be whether or not they want to support the Biden administration's lies or wars or the military industrial complex or not that they've already decided. It's just going to be a matter of can they possibly keep it under wraps what's really going on in Ukraine. But eventually the rest of the world is not going to want to carry the weight and carry the water for the corrupt Western media. The rest of the world is not going to want to carry the weight and carry the water for the corrupt Biden administration. They're already sick of it. They're already sick of it in Europe, and they're sick of it elsewhere. And the wildest thing is the ultimate, the final linchpin in this whole deal is the American liberal. As soon as you brainwashed idiots realize you've been conned, admit you've been lied to, not Jimmy Kimmel, we didn't know it came out of the lab and we still don't know. And the view, it doesn't matter if it came out of the lab, Trump is racist.

33:41 And the rest of you hacks, it's just unbelievable. You end up being the linchpin that is holding together the very military industrial complex that you claim to hate. You end up being the linchpin that is holding together the big pharmaceutical, big agra, big government, big tech collusion that you claim to hate. You're the linchpin holding it together and the whole world knows it. And you're just gonna have to, I mean, you're never gonna accept it though. You never accepted it when masks didn't work. You never accepted it when Hunter Biden's laptop was real. You never accepted it when the Wuhan lab leak theory was true. You'll never accept it. Before I get into the latest here out of Ukraine, we are listener supported and that's how we're able to tell the truth and speak our minds freely.

CHAPTER 12 / 49 Discussion

Alex Vindman, Trident International and Rebuilding Ukraine

Alex Vindman and his company, Trident International LLC, are linked to the logistics of the Ukraine conflict. The host suggests a "Pied Piper" scheme where the military-industrial complex profits from destroying Ukraine with weapons and then profits again through rebuilding contracts. This is compared to the "pharmaceutical-industrial complex" profiting from gain-of-function research and subsequent vaccine mandates.

alex vindman· trident international· volodymyr zelensky· blackrock· military-industrial complex

35:40 The Great Reset and the War for the World final signed copies are available exclusively at InfoWarsStore.com and it's your support there that keeps us on the air. And if you don't want to buy a product today, you can just go to InfoWarsStore.com, click on the donate tab and fund us that way as well. Now this was shared by Jack Posobiec here from the UK WSSC concept briefing, some Slides here, slides 28 and 29. Bottom line, Ukraine needs UKWSSC. And it's just saying like Ukraine can't survive without all the support, which is true. And then what are the points of contact here? Oh, Alex Vindman, CEO Trident International LLC. And that's that little trident that Zelensky's wearing everywhere?

36:42 So Zelensky's trident is tied to Alex Vindman and the United 24 logo is tied to a Balenciaga designer. That's what's on his sweatshirt that he wears everywhere that they're selling, by the way. You can buy one. Balenciaga, creative, inspired, and Alex Vindman, trident international, inspired. Or they're all just on the same team. And then who's Yevgeny Vindman? Well, is there another Vindman now? We've got multiple Vindmans. These Vindmans are running around everywhere. They're like naked mole rats running around foreign policy. Let's not forget it was Alex Vindman, you know, before he was the Democrat whistleblower, before he was the anti-Trump hero. Remember, he was offered jobs in Ukraine. Remember that? He was offered jobs in Ukraine for their military.

37:53 And he thought, you know, it'd probably be safer and more profitable if I just started a business and did work with you guys. Ah, yes. Very smart, Alex. Very wise indeed. And we'll make you a darling of the media. And we'll make you a darling of the Democrat Party. You know, a nice warmonger like us. So now the Vindmans are tied into this too? Who's all getting paid off in Ukraine right now? How many Republicans and Democrats are getting paid off in Ukraine right now? I know the ones that aren't. It's the ones that want to stop the war and stop funding it like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz and others. What about the rest of them? How many people are getting those billions that are going to Ukraine? 10% for the big guy? How much is Hunter Biden getting? How much is Vindman getting? Who's getting paid off? Who's making money? How much is BlackRock gonna make in the cleanup and the rebuild?

38:52 And they don't even hide it, folks. We covered it again, it was earlier this week or last week. I think it was the Associated Press or MSN. The story was syndicated everywhere. The next big project, rebuilding Ukraine. And so they have all these subtle ways of telling you what's really going on without telling you what's really going on. But if you can read between the lines and if you find the right sources of information, you figure it out. It's like, oh, I get it. I get it. Send all the weapons into Ukraine.

39:28 Start the war in Ukraine, destroy Ukraine, and then come in and rebuild afterwards. Brilliant. Brilliant. The Pied Piper of the military-industrial complex. Or kind of like, let's fund gain-of-function research in a laboratory and let's have the virus leak from the lab and then get a bunch of people sick. And then with the media that we own and control, we'll have them build it up to be the biggest story, the pandemic. And then with the media we own and control, we'll tell everybody to take our vaccine. And then with the government we own and control, we'll force them to buy our vaccine so that it's quote unquote free.

CHAPTER 13 / 49 Discussion

NBC Reporter Patrick Lancaster and Crimean Pro-Russia Sentiment

NBC News correspondent Kier Simmons is noted for a rare segment from Sevastopol admitting that it is unrealistic for Ukraine to retake Crimea. The host references independent reporter Patrick Lancaster's work, claiming that the majority of people in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine are pro-Russia. This is presented as a contradiction to the "hero" narrative surrounding Zelensky in the West.

nbc news· crimea· patrick lancaster· kier simmons· sevastopol

40:10 Oh, the big pharmaceutical industrial complex works just like the military industrial complex. And do they care how many people die? Oh, as long as they get filthy rich. And they do. More money going into Ukraine now more than ever. More money into big pharmaceutical and their vaccines now more than ever. Who's still falling for this crap? I'm telling you, I don't know how they're gonna keep this under wraps though. NBC reporter goes to Crimea, shocks viewers by telling the truth. And how everyone in Crimea is pro-Russia, anti-Zelensky. I mean, you can't say everybody, but it's like going to East Palestine, Ohio and asking people about Biden or Trump. Gonna be a pretty obvious majority response there. Yeah, you go to Crimea. Yeah, you go to Eastern Ukraine. Yeah, you go to Northern Ukraine. Yeah, you talk to people. It's gonna be pretty obvious how they feel about the situation.

41:12 And, uh, it's not the way you think. No, it's not. NBC reporter goes to Crimea, shocks viewers by telling the truth. Mainstream media correspondents for major U.S. networks rarely, if ever, report from inside Crimea and certainly are nowhere near Russian-held territory in eastern Ukraine. Patrick Lancaster is, though. reporting the truth there. However, this week NBC News Chief International Correspondent Kier Simmons went to Sevastopol, surrounded by a significant Russian military presence, given it is home to Russia's Navy's Black Sea Fleet, in a live segment admitted that it's not all realistic, at all realistic, that Zelensky and Ukraine forces can ever hope to take Crimea, and probably never Eastern Ukraine either. You've been lied to by your media,

42:02 Zelensky is not the media darling in Ukraine, he is in the West. He's not the hero, he is in Ukraine as he is here in the West. And the people there actually are mostly pro-Russia, pro-Putin at this point. Ladies and gentlemen, this book, The Great Reset and the War for the World, is a historic book that documents the globalists in their own words, plan for our future. That is a hellish future. Now you'll be always, while they still allow books, I guess they're starting to ban them, be able to get an unsigned copy of The Great Reset and the War for the World at bookstores, Amazon, or infowareshore.com. But you will never be able to get another signed copy of the book after the signed copies we got run out. And there's about a thousand left of them right now.

CHAPTER 14 / 49 Discussion

Nina Jankowicz Lawsuit Against Fox News and Disinformation Board

Nina Jankowicz is criticized for suing Fox News over her loss of employment at the DHS Disinformation Governance Board. The host mocks the circular logic of the government claiming the board didn't exist while Jankowicz sues for being fired from it. The lawsuit is characterized as a "Twilight Zone" attempt to use the legal system to bankrupt media opposition.

nina jankowicz· fox news· disinformation governance board· dhs· lawsuit

43:32 Again, InfoWars, Alex Jones, the Canary in the coal mine, what they do to us, they're gonna do to you next. And I'll just give you this little advanced warning too. They wanna put you in jail next and imprison you next. But we won't expand into that. Surely you understand that. They've done that to me. So just as a warning. But InfoWars was the hottest thing on the internet and Live streaming on the internet obviously a big source of information at some of the biggest watched shows and commentary is there now. Specifically YouTube and when Alex Jones was there and Infowars was there we were the top dog. I mean we'd be who knows where our numbers would be now if we were still there five years after the banhammer.

44:20 But what's the phenomenon for cable news? Well, it's Fox. Fox dominates the ratings. And it's not just Fox News, by the way, it's Fox Business. Fox Business dominates as Kudlow celebrates one year as number one business program on cable news. So Fox is just dominating the cable news rankings. And so they have to be stopped and they have to be shut down and they have to be sued. Now we played the Robert Forthrike video earlier this week where he's telling you their plan. They don't hide it anymore. They don't even subtly lie about it anymore. We need to censor them because of this, that or that. They just say, hey, we just want to censor them. They're our political opposition. And we're telling you they're bad guys. We just need them off the air. We just need to censor them. And you know what? We don't know how to do this because of the First Amendment. But we've got lawfare and legal fare. We can just crush these people with legal bills and lawsuits and everything. And we've got billions of dollars on our side. We're good lefties with our good billionaire capitalist friends that fund everything we do.

45:22 Or I mean communist friends. And so we don't need to care about money. We can sue all these people, shut them down and it's not even our money. It's great. Robert Reich even told you that. And now it's happening. And now they're going after Fox. And how, and now it's Nina Jankowicz. Nina Jankowicz asking for donations for a lawsuit because she lost her job at the Department of Homeland Security that they claimed she never had didn't exist. And now she's suing Fox News and she wants your money to do it. The blood is in the water. Here it is, Nina Jankowicz. My name is Nina Jankowicz. I'm asking for your financial support of a lawsuit I want to bring against Fox News for their malicious, reckless lies against me. A year ago today, I realized a lifelong dream and entered public service as a US government official. A lifelong dream? Wow. I spent the better part of a decade working on both sides of the aisle to counter disinformation.

46:28 I've published two books and I've always been an advocate for free expression. Oh yeah. The main thesis of my work is we can't fight disinformation simply by removing content or restricting speech. On March 2nd, 2022, I began a job leading a new entity within the Department of Homeland Security which they said didn't exist, called the Disinformation Governance Board. And they said it didn't exist. My role was to make sure different entities across DHS were coordinated to bring the latest research to bear in the department. Against conservatives. And to help the department ensure that its policies about its existing counter disinformation work were grounded in American values. Privacy, civil rights and civil liberties. That's all the board was. Yeah. It didn't have the ability or the authority to act on its own.

47:21 After my position was announced, baseless claims that the board was an Orwellian ministry of truth and I was President Biden's chief censor spread, even though the board had nothing to do with arbitrating. This is truly incredible stuff. We'll continue this on the other side. So remember, it was reported that the disinformation board didn't exist. They said, nope, it doesn't exist. It's not real. Now she's using its existence to fund a lawsuit against people that claimed it didn't exist. I don't exist, I'm not real. But by the way, I'm suing Fox News, please help me. Hi, I'm Nina Dzekowicz and I never worked for any US government position about disinformation. It never existed and anybody reporting that it existed lied to you like Fox News.

48:19 And so now I'm suing Fox News for reporting on my position at the Department of Justice, and they're reporting costing me my job that didn't exist. So Fox News lied when they said I worked there at a disinformation bureaucracy, and that cost me my job at the disinformation bureaucracy, which never existed. And so now I'm suing them for getting me fired for my job that didn't exist. Guys, why'd you stop the music? The show's not over.

48:54 We're still in this. I'm Nina Jankowicz. Fox News lied when they told you that the Biden administration had a disinformation bureaucracy and that I worked there. It never existed. And now because of Fox News' reporting, I've lost my job at the disinformation bureaucracy. And so I'm suing Fox News for costing my job working as a disinformation expert for the Bidens at a federal bureaucracy, none of which ever existed, by the way.

CHAPTER 16 / 49 Discussion

Savannah Hernandez Confronts Pete Buttigieg in East Palestine

Reporter Savannah Hernandez is praised for confronting Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg in East Palestine, Ohio. The host argues that the era of "decorum" in media is over because the government is "playing for keeps." The confrontation is held up as a model for how activists should treat public officials who avoid accountability.

savannah hernandez· pete buttigieg· east palestine· journalism· activism

54:48 So you don't have a voice to defend yourself, you don't have the capital to defend yourself, then you can't defend yourself, prison. That's their strategy. We're just a test case because we climb over the barbed wire to get to the necks of these tyrants politically before anybody else. And you see, that's the big aspect of this. And again, I tried different ways to impart this to the people. But you look at the video from last week,

55:26 in East Palestine with Savannah Hernandez when she goes up and confronts Pete Booty Judge. Now, of course, Savannah Hernandez started here at Infowars. I'm very proud that that's where she first worked and learned how to do this job properly. Because here's the mindset that all these yuppies and guppies in the media have. Oh my gosh, it's Pete Booty Judge. Oh, oh, I need to have class. I need to have respect. I need to have decorum. No, you don't. You owe Pete Buttigieg nothing. He is not your king. He is not your daddy. He is not your boss. And it's all changing now, folks. Because guess what people are realizing? Huh, that's the kind of coverage that works. That's the kind of activism that works. So this whole mentality is about to change, folks.

56:31 Because it's not just gonna be Infowars and Alex Jones under the attack, they're coming after everybody now. So yeah, Pete Buttigieg doesn't deserve decorum when he shows up in East Palestine three weeks after the event for a photo op and his press secretary says, please put your cameras away, we don't wanna answer questions, well then what are you doing here? But this whole notion is going away, folks. And I'm telling you, it used to be, we don't wanna do news coverage like that. We don't wanna do that. We here at this organization, we're not like that. We don't do this, we don't do that. It's all done. That whole notion is going away. Because now that they're under attack, they understand, okay, gloves are off. You guys are playing for keeps. Decorum, respect, honor, integrity? No, they're playing for keeps.

CHAPTER 17 / 49 Discussion

DOJ Support for Trump Lawsuits and George Floyd Riots

The Justice Department's stance that Donald Trump can be sued for January 6th damages is criticized as a double standard. The host asks why similar legal precedents aren't applied to Democrats or media outlets like CNN for inciting the George Floyd riots. The legal system is described as a "kangaroo court" that protects liberals while targeting conservatives.

donald trump· department of justice· january 6· george floyd riots· cnn

57:35 This is how it's gonna go. But you know what their response is gonna be? Sue, censor, and imprison. But we're ahead of their plan. We see it all now. Fox News defamation case tests reach of press protections. Yeah, remember when the Department of Justice, the FBI came after me and a judge said, well, how are you doing this? He's a journalist. This is violating Obama's rule and protection for journalists. And they didn't care.

58:12 But see, they're throwing the chum in the water now. Trump can be sued for January 6th riot harm, Justice Department says. The Justice Department might as well take a neon sign or no, you know what? They can do better than that, actually. They should take a gigantic blimp. Maybe one of those Chinese spy balloons, get a nice big Chinese spy balloon sized blimp and put a huge sign on it that says, Sue Trump, we have your back, signed Justice Department. They're just begging for people to, they're throwing the chum in the water. Info Wars was the test, Info Wars was the start, a stress test, a pressure test of their control. How much do they control the courts? How much do they control the media? How much can they control juries, attorneys?

59:02 And what do they get? They got the outrageous results in the Alex Jones Infowars cases, and people are still trying to sue and come after us. So, okay, this is what we can do. Now let's get Trump. Now let's get Fox News. And they're throwing the chum in the water. They're waving the flag. They're putting the neon sign out. Sue them. Sue Fox News. Sue Donald Trump. We'll shut them down just like Alex Jones. We'll get them too. And your little dog too. And then they come up here for Alex's cat. And your little cat Mooshu too. Trump, the Associated Press, I mean, are you kidding me? The Associated Press, please sue Donald Trump. Please just sue the man. Sue him so badly. Trump can be sued for January 6th riot harm, Justice Department says. That's great.

59:56 I wanna see this precedent applied equally. That's what I'd like. I'd like to see this get applied equally. But again, they've stress tested their control over all of it. If Trump can be sued for the January 6th riot harm, then how much can CNN, MSNBC, ABC, Democrats be sued for the George Floyd riots? What about the hundreds of police officers hospitalized during those riots? What about the ambushes and the murders of police officers because of all the anti-police rhetoric on television and in the Democrat Party? Can they be sued? Can we get a little equal application here? Can we get a little logical consistency here? Imagine that applied equally. What about all the Trump supporters that have been assaulted over the years, like yours truly? Can we sue because of the lies told about us?

1:00:53 Do we get to take advantage of this? No, this is nothing about justice. This is all about them waving the flag. We own the legal system. We own the juries. We own the attorneys. We own everything. Go for them. Green light, chum in the water, eat them up. They're protected. Democrat, liberal, privileged, they're protected. And they will do everything they can to help your case against their political opposition. And they're waving the flag, putting up the neon light in the sky, sue, sue, sue, we've got your back, while they protect their own. Attorney General Merrick Garland overruled FBI agents who wanted to close Trump document probe, approved the Mar-a-Lago raid. I'm telling you, there's a little bit of a

CHAPTER 18 / 49 Discussion

FBI Whistleblowers, Joe Biden Documents and The Squad Corruption

Attorney General Merrick Garland is accused of overruling FBI agents to approve the Mar-a-Lago raid. Other news items include an FBI whistleblower claiming the bureau targets pro-lifers, Joe Biden allegedly hiding documents regarding Taliban deals, and FEC complaints against "Squad" member Cori Bush for payments to her husband.

merrick garland· fbi· joe biden· whistleblower· cori bush

1:01:53 We'll call it a cold civil war if you will inside a lot of these federal bureaucracies. Not everybody at the FBI is a corrupt criminal, not everybody at the FBI is a Democrat, but I repeat myself. And so when agents are like, look, hey, we need to stop this, there's nothing there, there's no case. Garland says, doesn't matter, we're going after Trump, don't you know? It's a green light, it's political persecution time, it's takeover time, go in for the raid. And so they did it and then you saw Garland squirming around like a grub worm During the hearings, whistleblower reveals how the corrupt FBI is using a threat tag to target pro-lifers as domestic threats. FBI retaliated by suspending him. Yeah, they're targeting Christians, conservatives. Same thing with the IRS. Pentagon Inspector General Joe Biden is hiding classified documents detailing side deals he made with Taliban and against US troops. Oh, is that why he had all those secret documents?

1:02:59 Stashed all over the United States, but he had no idea. How did they get there? That's not mine, baby I'm just clueless stupid old Joe. I don't know what's going on But don't worry the deep state will protect me and then when there's a whistleblower an Israeli professor Whistleblower who turns over evidence of Joe Biden's potential crimes overseas Joe Biden has him arrested and locked up FEC complaint filed over squad member Cori Bush's private security payments to husband. Nice, nice. The squad keeps paying off their people. Ilhan Omar pays off her family, Cori Bush pays off her family, AOC pays off her family. That's amazing. That's amazing. Hundreds of thousands of dollars even. Millions probably all of them combined.

1:04:01 Isn't that great? Oh, they want to stop government corruption. Oh, they're against the big government. Yeah, they're anti-establishment. And they take that blank check from daddy government and hand it right to themselves. Nice. Very nice. You guys are really fighting the system. Twitter file number 17 drops the state-sponsored blacklists. Matt Taibbi releases the Global Engagement Center and state-sponsored blacklists. Yeah, you kind of, look, I don't know. We'll see if this ever equals to anything, maybe in some congressional hearings. But as far as the media approach is concerned with your little timed release story, it's over. It's over. You should have done one big comprehensive story, dominated the cycle for a day or two, forced Congress's hand to act. But now you're doing this weird controlled release and people are yawning.

CHAPTER 19 / 49 Discussion

Twitter Files Number 17 and Washington Post on Fox News

The host critiques Matt Taibbi's release of "Twitter Files #17," arguing that the "controlled release" strategy is causing the public to lose interest. Additionally, a Washington Post story about Fox News bosses scolding reporters is interpreted as the Post advocating for more censorship within Fox.

twitter files· matt taibbi· washington post· fox news· censorship

1:05:01 And we already know the story. Give it all over to Congress, give it all over to the members of Congress, the Republican Party that wanna take legal action. Release it all to the public, do a comprehensive story, and let's get some action. But you do this controlled release, and now people are yawning and moving on to other stuff, sadly. And you know, I was reading this in the Washington Post and the story did not go the way I thought it would. Fox News bosses scolded reporters who challenged false election claims. And while it does give you some of the backroom talk and you can expect what goes on in personal conversations. Yeah, I mean, they were talking about it. And they were talking about the seriousness of the allegations and the seriousness of January 6th. But it wasn't, I thought it would be a lot more Fox News making sure it was censored and all this and not really.

1:05:54 But I guess maybe the Washington Post wanted that. The Washington Post wanted Fox News to censor its news hosts. I guess that's the problem they have though. The Washington Post, pro-censorship, where democracy dies in darkness. Next year's news today, and I'm like Abraham Lincoln. I'm actually Abraham Lincoln's clone. But I cannot tell a lie. I cannot tell a lie. And so, well, we've been proven right on a couple other stories, but I cannot tell a lie, I like being right. I do. I like being right. That's just, you got me. I like being right. That's why I work at InfoWars. I like free speech and I like being right. So here we are.

CHAPTER 20 / 49 Discussion

Democrat Social Media Propagandists and Twitter Algorithm Changes

The host mocks Democrat-aligned social media figures like "JoJo from Jers" and Angela Belcamino, claiming their popularity was manufactured by rigged algorithms. Since Elon Musk's takeover of Twitter, these accounts have reportedly seen a massive drop in engagement. The host characterizes them as "propaganda agents" rather than organic influencers.

elon musk· twitter· jojo from jers· angela belcamino· algorithms

1:09:04 As if we don't have enough confirmation that these are paid for Democrat operatives that you see like JoJo from Jers is one example. You don't follow these people, but their crap always ends up in your newsfeed. Now that's changing, but that's coming up next. Well, JoJo from Jers is looking for dates on a dating app called Bumble and on her little profile here Let's see what she has. A mom of two amazing kids, separated since 19. I work in social media. Is that what you call it? Is that what you call it? You work in social media. So that's what you call being a Democrat paid propagandist on Twitter, is it? Do you need any other proof?

1:09:57 And then another one that you're probably not seeing as much of anymore because Twitter and Elon Musk are fixing the rigged algorithms that made you see their crap like Angelina, uh, Angela Balcamino, a real nasty wench. And she's pointing this out that, hey, I used to be popular on Twitter. I used to get all kinds of impressions. What happened? Well, the algorithms that were rigged to make you popular, the algorithms that were rigged to make you seem popular have been fixed and you're not popular. She tweets out, in the past, I could tweet an emoji and get a thousand likes. Now I could tweet a picture of my beep and not break 50. Yeah, you were never popular.

1:10:46 You were never organically popular. You're not an e-celeb. You're a propaganda agent propped up by the Democrat Party and their friends in big tech. But Elon Musk is not their friend. And the algorithms that you've been taking advantage of for so many years are now gone. And you're realizing it the hard way. But don't worry, because she'll probably post a picture of her, beep, to try to get that popularity back. Good for you, Angela. Ah, you love it when they tell you who they are, don't you? You love it when they tell you who they are. And here's another example. This is... You know, how do you feel about this out of Texas? Texas Republicans introduced a bill to give huge tax cuts to straight couples having children with up to 100% cut in property taxes for having 10 kids.

CHAPTER 21 / 49 Discussion

Texas Tax Cuts for Large Families and Liberal Backlash

Texas Republicans have introduced a bill offering property tax cuts for straight couples who have children, reaching a 100% cut for those with ten kids. Liberal commentators are criticized for comparing the pro-family legislation to "The Handmaid's Tale." The host expresses support for the bill as a way to "stick it to the US government."

texas· tax cuts· property tax· family· handmaid's tale

1:11:49 The bill's author said, get married, stay married, and be fruitful and multiply. Now the liberal commentator covering this says, this is handmaid's tale type stuff. So get married, be happily married, and have children is handsmaid's tale stuff. You guys are really reaching. You guys really hate the family, don't you? Well, how else are you going to control the youth if they don't have a family unit? So that's why they want to destroy the family. I have always wanted to have kids. I've been a little more married to my career and my personal work than, and not really very interested in dating quite frankly. But, um, boy if anything was gonna, if anything would accelerate me towards getting married and having kids, this would actually do it. I would, I would have 10 kids just to stick it to the US government. I'm not even kidding. How many people would, would say, oh I can't, I don't have to pay taxes if I had 10 kids? Let's get to work.

1:12:47 How long is this gonna take? Let's go. Can we have Irish, what do they call it, Irish twins or Irish brothers and sisters? That's probably racist. Oh, the Irish are white, so it's cool. Get married, stay married, and be fruitful, the liberals say. How dare you get married and have kids and stay married? How will we destroy the family if you do that? How will we destroy cities if you do that? How will we destroy the youth if you do that? How will we control their minds if you do that? How will we have drag queen story time if you do that? Shut it down! Ten kids, I don't have to pay taxes? Oh. Hmm. But they're telling you who they really are. They hate the family. Hate it! Atheist group furious at New University of Colorado head coach Deion Sanders for infusing his program with Christianity. Oh my gosh!

CHAPTER 22 / 49 Discussion

Deion Sanders and Christianity at University of Colorado

Football coach Deion Sanders is defended against criticism from atheist groups regarding his use of Christian themes in his program at the University of Colorado. The host praises Sanders for teaching young men to be "godly" and predicts the football program will see significant success under his leadership.

deion sanders· university of colorado· christianity· football· atheists

1:13:50 Deion Sanders wants the young men that he brings into his football program to be good, upstanding men and godly men? That build strong families like he did? Oh my gosh. Oh no. And by the way, I've been kind of following this story with Deion Sanders. What he's doing at the University of Colorado is actually amazing. Inspiring. Game-changing. What he's doing. He's changing the game. Very pro-black, by the way. Good for him. And so he wants to bring in young black men to play football for Colorado and he wants to teach them how to be godly men and that angers the liberal.

1:14:38 Oh, you mean, Deion Sanders doesn't want guys that are gonna get arrested and Deion Sanders doesn't want guys that'll go to the NFL and ruin their careers before they can fully blossom and Deion Sanders wants to have men that go through his university be good, strong, godly men that have families and good husbands and children? And they're pissed. They're angry. Good. Good. Be angry. Go after Deion Sanders. You're only gonna commit him to his mission even more. You're only gonna make him more stronger. And I'll go ahead and make a prediction right now. The Colorado Buffaloes haven't been a noteworthy football program in decades. I bet you Deion Sanders has them in the top 25, if not by the end of this season, certainly by the end of next season. And that will have the Liberals panic because he'll probably say a prayer on the field with his team after the game. Oh my gosh. What is the future

CHAPTER 23 / 49 Discussion

Health of Dianne Feinstein and John Fetterman

The hospitalizations of Senators Dianne Feinstein and John Fetterman are discussed, with the host questioning how Fetterman is co-sponsoring bills while incapacitated. The situation is described as the "future of the Democrat Party," where "vegetables" and AI advise the cabinet. Republicans are noted for demanding "proof of life" for Fetterman.

dianne feinstein· john fetterman· senate· democrats· proof of life

1:15:40 Democrats in Congress. What is the future of Democrat senators? Dianne Feinstein's hospitalization leaves Senate Democrats without outright majority. John Fetterman sponsors another bill from hospital bed. Even Newsweek is doubting this. Newsweek headline John Fetterman letter from hospital bed raises questions so Feinstein. She's like 99 She's unable to do her job. She's in the hospital John Fetterman. He's suffering from massive Problems with a stroke or whatever the hell is going on with the thing on his neck and other such things But this is the future of the Democrat Party after all it's kind of like this

1:16:31 Romanian Prime Minister using AI to advise cabinet. Well, yeah, that's the future of the Democrat Party. You invite somebody who's a vegetable in a hospital bed, or you invite somebody with such a mental incapacity that it doesn't even matter. You just have AI, or somebody else is voting for them, or AI, or a computer, or they're voting by proxy. Yes, Dianne Feinstein, Senator Feinstein in there for the 700th year, the 89-year-old And then John Fetterman, who during his campaign for Senate couldn't talk, couldn't walk, couldn't debate, couldn't even do interviews without technological assistance and is now in the hospital. And nobody even knows what's going on. And the Republicans asked for proof of life and they got nothing, but somehow he's co-sponsoring bills. That's the future of the Democrat Party. It's like, where are all the Democrats? They're in the hospital, they're in the mental ward, they've been institutionalized, but they're still voting.

CHAPTER 24 / 49 Discussion

East Palestine Health Crisis and Celebrity Medical Emergencies

Workers in East Palestine, Ohio, are reporting migraines and nausea following the Norfolk Southern train derailment. The segment also links celebrity health issues, such as Justin Bieber's tour cancellation and an Elvis movie star's ER visit, to potential vaccine injuries, though the host notes the media refuses to ask about vaccination status.

east palestine· norfolk southern· justin bieber· vaccine· fbi

1:17:33 They're still voting. It's all good there. Let's not forget about the people of East Palestine still suffering. The New Ground Zero East Palestine workers reporting migraines and nausea. More workers in East Palestine at the site of the toxic train derailment are reporting intense headaches and nausea, prompting fears that the cleanup could constitute a New Ground Zero health disaster. And they say, oh, it's fine. It's fine. Pete Booty judge shows up for a photo op and his press secretary says, we're not taking questions. Rail worker who cleaned toxic Norfolk Southern derailment site getting sick after government officials said everything is fine. Nothing to see here. All good baby baby. Pete Booty judge is in control. Senate votes to declassify all government intelligence documents related to COVID-19 origins. Is Fauci nervous yet? Well...

1:18:36 We are finding out all the hundreds of millions he was making while he was running the NIH or whatever other outfit bureaucracy he was involved with, making just hundreds of millions of dollars. And when Rand Paul asks where the money goes, Fauci says, I don't have to tell you that. Really? 31-year-old star of Elvis movie rushed to the ER, body just shut down. Body just shut down. While he was there, doctors ran a battery of tests and determined that the pain was caused by stress and exhaustion He was complaining about chest pain, severe chest pain. But don't ask if it has anything to do with the vaccine or if he had a vaccine. Same thing with Justin Bieber. Justin Bieber's Justice World Tour canceled after several postponements. Now remember, Bieber had the Guillaume Barre incident after the vaccine, had to cancel shows and now an entire tour. But don't ask about the vaccine.

CHAPTER 25 / 49 Discussion

Montana Blood Donor Bill and Biden Climate Grants

A Montana bill (HB645) seeks to ban vaccinated individuals from donating blood due to spike protein concerns. Meanwhile, the Biden administration's EPA is criticized for awarding $1 billion in climate grants while pausing the cleanup in East Palestine. The host argues "green energy" is merely a scheme for stealing taxpayer money.

montana· blood donation· mrna· epa· east palestine

1:19:42 Bill would ban vaccinated donors from giving blood due to high count spike proteins. HB645 would fine vaccinated people or people suffering along COVID $500 for knowingly donating tainted blood as well as donation centers that receive it. A bill proposed in Montana seeks to bar people injected with COVID-19 mRNA jabs from donating to a blood bank. So the realization The truth about this vaccine is being revealed. And we've got Bob Barnes coming up in the third hour in studio here in about 10 minutes to discuss some of the further legal advancements on this issue. But you see, this is how it goes with these corrupt

1:20:30 Liberals, they pretend it's all about green energy, sustainable energy. No, it's not. It's all about stealing your money. Just like it always is. Biden's EPA awards nearly $1 billion in climate grants while at the same time orders a pause to clean up East Palestine. Yeah, he's got to pay off his friends, his buddies that have these green new energy companies, and they get billions of dollars. And then all the people that own their stock also, they get a nice bump in their stock. It's all rigged. It's not about stopping man-made climate change. It's about making money and stopping man. And they do a great job, don't they? The mother is demanding an apology. Reporter asks Kareen Jean-Pierre if Biden regrets laughing at grieving mother who lost her son to fentanyl poisoning. Well, it's all a joke.

CHAPTER 26 / 49 Discussion

Hershey's Transgender Campaign and Toronto Raptors Apology

Hershey's is criticized for featuring a transgender woman as the face of its Women's History Month campaign. Additionally, the Toronto Raptors apologized for a video where players stated women are great because they can procreate. The host mocks the apology, calling the current cultural climate "Looney Tunes land."

hershey's· toronto raptors· women's history month· transgender· procreation

1:21:23 It's all a joke to the liberals. Now this next video is actually so insane. I'm wondering if it's even real. It is Women's History Month and as if Hershey's putting a man as the face of their new Women's History Month wasn't enough. That's right. Transface of new Hershey's campaign blasts transphobic response. It's a man. It's a man It's the face of Women's History Month. One more time. You heard me right. It's a man that is the face of Women's History Month for her, she, chocolate. And they've changed their name, spelling it too. Her, she, like it's a pronoun. Well, as if that's not ridiculous enough, the Toronto Raptors NBA franchise, and guys, see if there's any other news out there, because I just came across a story. This is so hard to believe.

1:22:29 put out a video that's pro-woman and they ask the basketball players what's so great about women? Why are women so great? And do we have that video by the way? So here's the response. Why would this Toronto Raptors video warrant an apology? Here it is. Girls were in the world because they're the only one that can procreate. They birth everybody. All women are great because they're all queens. Oh my gosh. All women, they birth everybody. They're the only ones that can procreate. Oh no, you didn't. Not in the year 2023, you bigot. So apparently Toronto is, have they offered an apology for this?

1:23:25 Toronto Raptors apologize for misguided Women's History Month videos. So, so they take a man and they make a man the face of Women's History Month and then they ask men why women are so great and they say women are great, they're the only ones that can procreate and they gave me birth and the Raptors have to apologize because that's what? Not true?

CHAPTER 27 / 49 Discussion

Canadian Teacher with Prosthetic Breasts and Hair Formula Ad

A Canadian teacher famous for wearing large prosthetic breasts was reportedly put on leave, allegedly because he does not wear them outside of school. The host suggests the teacher might be "trolling" to highlight societal insanity. This transitions into a brief advertisement for "Hair and Beard Formula" at the InfoWars Store.

canada· prosthetic breasts· trolling· infowars store· hair formula

1:24:02 Is that what we're arguing? Is that not true? You cannot make this stuff up. We are in Looney Tunes land at this point. I mean, literally, it's Looney Tunes land. It's Michael Jordan in Space Jam dunking from half court with five aliens attached to his back. It's like, what does Bugs Bunny say? It's, you're in the cartoon world. You're in the cartoon world, Mike. Say, oh, we're in Looney Tunes land now. If you say women can procreate, that's bigoted. Remember the teacher in Canada with the gigantic fake breasts? You know this one? So it turns out it's true that that was either a troll or at least the teacher was only wearing them in school. Teacher with prosthetic Z-cup breasts put on leave. Now get this, they didn't put the teacher on leave for wearing the fake breasts during school.

1:25:13 They put the teacher on leave because the teacher doesn't wear the breasts outside of school. Now this is wrong for so many different reasons. We all know gender is fluid. So maybe the teacher identifies as a woman in the classroom and nowhere else. So how bigoted is it to put this teacher on leave because they identify as a different species or gender outside the classroom than they do inside the classroom. How dare you bigots! Or did they find out he was just trolling with the fake breasts and that's why they're punishing him. So, you know, wearing gigantic fake breasts to class, okay. But doing it as a political stunt to show how insane people are, no good. I don't know guys. Do you think the beard is intimidating? Do you think it's too much? Yeah, I mean, it looks pretty good but I don't know, it's just a beard.

1:26:10 It's just not that intimidating, dude. Hmm. Just a beard, huh? What about... I gotta go to the bathroom. Dude, that's intimidating, man. That's freaking awesome. You're on a five. Get your hair and beard formula at infowarsstore.com. Sexy! And intimidating.

CHAPTER 28 / 49 Discussion

Russell Brand and Joe Rogan on Bill Gates and Alex Jones

Highlights from Russell Brand's appearance on the Joe Rogan Experience are discussed, focusing on Bill Gates' activities in Africa and the "Real Anthony Fauci" book. Rogan defends Alex Jones' track record on Jeffrey Epstein and social credit scores, while acknowledging Jones' "tremendous mistake" regarding Sandy Hook during a period of mental breakdown.

russell brand· joe rogan· bill gates· jeffrey epstein· sandy hook

1:26:57 Alright, a couple of the heavyweights in podcasting got together yesterday, Joe Rogan and Russell Brand. And man, it sounded a lot like an InfoWars transmission. And rightfully so, Alex Jones was brought up numerous times in the conversation. And so I wanted to play some of the highlights here from Russell Brand on the Joe Rogan experience. Here's just some of it and them bringing up Alex Jones. Bill Gates ain't Willy Wonka. He ain't doing this for like a competition. There's no golden ticket at the end of this. It's like a not-for-profit organization's making profit, an incredible amount of influence in areas that he profits from, all sorts of peculiar business practices like in India and on the continent of Africa that have led to like palpable suffering and profit in his case. The Africa thing is wild and that's a big part of this, the Real Anthony Fauci book.

1:27:54 He talks about Bill Gates quite a bit and one of the things he talks about is how they've always used Africa as a place where they test out medicines. They've used Africa as a place where they test out... This is another thing that I learned from Alex Jones. Alex Jones was saying that they were giving kids the polio vaccine in Africa and that Bill Gates was involved in this and they had to stop doing it because it was actually giving kids polio. And I was like, what? And they pull up an AP article. There was an AP story about this and it shows this terrified little African baby and they're dropping the polio vaccine in his mouth, like squeezing his face, dropping his mouth. I'm like, what the f***, man? They gave kids polio with a vaccine?

1:28:36 Even when you accept everything that they say at this late point when it appears impossible to do that, they wouldn't release patents so that African nations could recreate the vaccines over there. So clearly there's a profit motive and I saw him publicly talk about that and say, oh no, it's not as simple as that, you can't just give people the patents and stuff like that. But it seems like if you recognise that what drives them always is power, finance and dominion, if you always look at that and then track their actions, you hardly ever see a disruption in that pattern. These characters that have become so maligned and marginalized, even in my lifetime where I still worked in mainstream media, people like Alex Jones or David Icke, they were like, even people that were skeptical about them or even people that ridiculed them didn't try to posit them as dangerous. And the same I'm assuming with Robert Kennedy. Well, the David Icke one, they always made fun of him for lizard people.

1:29:32 Because he always would say that they're shapeshifters and they're lizards and there was no evidence. It just seemed really preposterous. And then in the beginning of the pandemic, he was trying to connect COVID with 5G. There was a lot of weird, like... He's got some squirrely ones believe it or not like it's it's hard to say Like to the general public Alex Jones is way more reliable right than David Ike, but he's way more reliable than David Ike Alex made a tremendous mistake with Sandy Hook and he did that in a time of his life where he's experiencing a psychotic break and

1:30:08 He was drinking a lot and he was having a mental breakdown and he really believed that everything was a conspiracy and that the government is essentially run by these evil demons who are trying to depopulate America and ruin people and he thought they were trying to take away people's guns and he was convinced that someone had convinced him. I don't know how he, I don't know what documentaries or what videos he saw, but he was convinced that they were using crisis actors and that they were orchestrating a false flag. He was obviously very wrong. And has admitted that he was wrong about that, but he's been right about a lot of things so many things and I've talked about this many times But he was the guy who told me about Epstein's Island more than a decade ago And I thought it was the craziest thing I'd ever heard I was like what are you saying? There's an island like it sounds like a plot in a movie. There's an island

1:31:02 Island where they they fly famous rich scientists and politicians and they compromise them with Underage girls and get it on film so they could use it against them like what that sounds like hor That sounds like lizard people. It sounds like, you know, 5G creates COVID. Same thing. Yeah. But turns out it was true. And it's one of many things. He was the one, the first one to warn me about a social credit score system. He's like, they're going to try to implement a social credit score system and your money is going to be tied. They'll have centralized digital currency and your money will be tied to your social credit score system. And you step out of line, you won't be able to buy things.

CHAPTER 29 / 49 Discussion

Bob Barnes on Pfizer Fraud and Brooke Jackson Whistleblower Case

Attorney Bob Barnes provides an update on the Brooke Jackson whistleblower case against Pfizer. Barnes argues that Pfizer's legal defense relies on government complicity rather than factual innocence. He claims Pfizer violated its contract with the Trump administration by failing to deliver a "safe and effective" vaccine that prevents COVID-19, potentially opening the door for massive liability under the False Claims Act.

bob barnes· pfizer· brooke jackson· fda· false claims act

1:31:40 You won't be able to travel. You won't be able to do anything. They're gonna try to keep you within a 15 minute radius of your home and they're starting to do that in places. Yeah, all of it's real. And in China, the social credit score system is 100% real and implemented. With Bob Barnes in studio, we got a bunch of legal subjects to discuss here, but I really just Bob Barnes to come on here and give us a update on all the different proceedings that are going on right now that you're involved in or others. When it comes to the vaccine mandates, people losing their jobs, where it stands, where it's going in the future. Because from my perspective, it looks like their plans for the vaccine tyranny, the medical tyranny really have failed.

1:32:26 I mean they gave out the cards right that had five things here. Here's your five vaccine cards. This is your vaccine pass. Well, that's gone. So that just so that's failed and people are not getting five vaccines, but there's still some fallout people losing their jobs mandates. So with some of the litigation you're involved in, where do you see it going and where is it right now? Really the biggest case that's going to determine and decide whether they're ever held accountable for their various lies, that Pfizer lied and people died because of those lies, is going to be the Brooke Jackson case where we had oral argument this week. in Beaumont, Texas on Wednesday. The court allowed about four hours of oral argument on it. There was a lot of briefing that happened before then. The court expressed concern with Pfizer's argument that the net effect of Pfizer's argument could be that there's no role for the judiciary in overseeing what takes place if the FDA simply continues to go along with the Pfizer fraud.

1:33:19 And so the court's concern was just as a matter of principle. So we'll see what happens. The court's going to decide whether that case proceeds to discovery or not. It's going to be issuing a written opinion at some point in the next either several weeks, several months, depending on how long it takes the court to review everything. A lot of extensive and expansive briefing in the case, a lot of argument in the case. But what was extraordinary to me was Pfizer's defense. Pfizer's defense was not that these allegations are false. They challenge whether the allegations are true, but at this stage of the pleadings, they have to assume them to be true legally. Their argument was solely even if all of the, even if they created a dangerous, ineffective drug that they disguised as a vaccine that they said would be for the prevention of COVID-19 that didn't prevent COVID at all. In fact, in some cases, it appears the infection rate

1:34:05 It goes up with COVID depending on how many booster shots that you've had, not only other dangers of the vaccine, that none of that matters. That as long as the Biden administration and the Justice Department and the FDA and the Defense Department go along with this scam, that nobody can ever hold them accountable. They have special immunity under the PrEP Act, and they have additional immunity under this contract. The only way to hold them accountable is the Brooke Jackson suit. And that's why they've gone all out to deny discovery, to publicly attack Brooke Jackson, to publicly attack me, and to publicly attack others, is they can't afford any discovery or ever be held accountable. Because I think what we will find is, what Brooke Jackson saw was she was just this ordinary person,

1:34:48 who oversees clinical trials, have been doing this for almost 20 years. They try to portray her as an anti-vaxxer, it's completely false. She's just someone, in fact, she had no reason to doubt anything about this drug or this vaccine, was excited to be part of it, wanted to see it be successful. She stumbles into a complete disaster. And so bad that you would walk in and you could see needles sticking out of bags. You could see people's private medical records stuck on the walls for anybody to look at. You saw people rolling out in the alley, out in the side corridors who were not being monitored for their adverse events that they were suffering from.

1:35:25 You saw people's blood being not taken in the proper way. You saw people, basically it was supposed to be a randomized test. It wasn't. Supposed to be a placebo-controlled test. It wasn't. Supposed to be a blinded clinical trial. It wasn't. All the data was doctored. All the data was in many ways fabricated or falsified. The certifications were fraudulent. The invoices were bogus. And Pfizer's whole other argument was, well, really we didn't have to comply with the FDA rules. But right in the contracts, as the court itself started out the hearing with, the court that started out with, well, doesn't this provision of the contract say that Pfizer will comply with all of the FDA rules and regulations?

1:36:04 Yes, it does. Does it say later in the contract that in fact this is all part of the entire process? Yes, it does. Indeed, what Pfizer promised the Trump Defense Department goes beyond just FDA approval. They said we will deliver a safe effective vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19. The words for the prevention of COVID-19 are listed as a deliverable item more than a half dozen times in the contract Pfizer signed with the Defense Department. And yet, what did they deliver? They delivered something that was not safe. In fact, it was uniquely and extraordinarily dangerous, according to the government's own vaccine adverse event reporting system. That is not effective, as the whole world knows, and as Pfizer's own CEO admitted to the European authorities, saying we didn't even really test for whether it was effective or not. It didn't prevent infection. It didn't prevent transmission.

1:36:57 We now know of course it wasn't a vaccine, it was a gene therapy. It's important to note this Defense Department contract was created at a time where the word vaccine still meant vaccine. It still meant something that inoculated and immunized against a disease. Now if they try to pull a quick one and say we changed the definition, does it hold? what the definition was at the time? It doesn't in this case, because here the definition of vaccine in the contract was the definition commonly understood at the time. So they would have to go back and rewrite that contract and they never have. They've never managed the Biden Justice Department and the Biden Defense Department has never gone back and redone this contract. The only contract was the one signed by the Trump Defense Department. And the Trump Defense Department said you will deliver this and you'll only get paid if you deliver it.

1:37:44 You must deliver something that's been FDA approved as a safe, effective vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19. Basically, a weak version of the virus is what it was at the time, put into your arm. It has to be that. Exactly. It has to be something that inoculates. And it was key. Even the contract language said there's three things you could deliver. You could deliver something that's a diagnostic tool. You could deliver something that is a treatment tool. Or you could deliver something that is a preventative tool. So it distinguished the three and it said what you're going to deliver us Pfizer if you're wanting to get paid is you're going to deliver us something that is a preventative tool that it will prevent COVID-19. That was repeated all the way through the contract. That's where if President Trump fully appreciates the Brooke Jackson case, he would understand he was lied to by Pfizer.

1:38:40 And that it is time for the president to recognize he was lied to by Pfizer, that the American people were lied to by Pfizer. And he should say they should be held accountable for the lies they told. Because this is the biggest mass crime by any company in the history of the United States. Since Pfizer. Since Pfizer, yeah, they're trying to one-up themselves. Completely. I've always told people that Pfizer makes El Chapo look like a street corner drug dealer. That no Mexican drug cartel could ever imagine having the deleterious and damaging and destructive effect that Pfizer has had.

CHAPTER 30 / 49 Discussion

Biden Administration Conflict of Interest in Vaccine Mandates

Bob Barnes discusses the conflict of interest within the Biden administration, which mandated a drug that whistleblowers warned was unsafe. He notes that Pfizer's lawyers continue to wear masks in court, which he interprets as a tacit admission that the vaccines do not work. The segment highlights the administration's efforts to block discovery in the Pfizer litigation.

joe biden· vaccine mandates· pfizer· department of justice· conflict of interest

1:39:15 And nothing like what they've done here. And this is why they're desperate. Their whole argument to the court was, judge, the Biden administration is with us, so don't let this case go forward. They didn't have an argument from the contract. They didn't have an argument from the facts. They didn't have an argument from the law. Their only argument was, please, judge, don't allow the case to go to discovery because the Food and Drug Administration is still on our side. Because the Defense Department is still on our side. The Biden administration is still on our side. And our point was, there's a clear conflict of interest with the Biden administration. That it's independent of the politics and the party shifting and the personalities of the Trump to Biden shift. The big difference is Trump didn't mandate anyone take this drug. The Biden administration did. So they have a conflict. What if the whole world knew that the top high ranking cabinet officials, including the president himself,

1:40:03 mandated and forced people to take a drug as a condition of employment, as a condition of serving in the United States military. A drug that they knew, because Brooke Jackson had told members of the FDA this all the way back at the beginning, that they knew was not safe, not effective, not a vaccine, didn't prevent COVID-19, that the deliverable that Pfizer had brought to the US taxpayers violated the very core essential elemental requirements of a deliverer of what was supposed to be a deliverable to them. And then in fact, tens of thousands of people, according to the government's own data, dead, millions of people disabled and suffering severe injuries. It would be the biggest pub political scandal in the history of the United States. Well, and it sounds like too.

1:40:46 even though that's the larger issue, the contractual violation is the home run here. I mean, that's the ball sitting on the tee waiting to be knocked out of the park. That's the fraud. That's the obvious self-evident fraud. They said, here's what we're going to deliver. And they sent in an invoice saying, we agree this is in accordance with the agreement. This is in accordance with the contract with work performed. We're delivering you a safe, effective vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19. It wasn't safe. It wasn't effective. It wasn't a vaccine and it didn't prevent COVID-19. They lied. People died time. They'd be held liable. All right, this is a story the mainstream media doesn't want to touch. And that's because at the end of this segment on the mainstream media, it's brought to you by Pfizer. Well, we don't have that message into our breaks, do we? So we'll talk about this. Hey, now, that Pfizer lawyer wears the mask in court to protect.

1:41:34 himself from COVID don't you know? Yeah, exactly. Even though he's been vaccinated against COVID. Yeah. I mean, you should almost use that as an argument. Oh, it was, it was tempting. I, you know, I said next to somebody that was tempting. Oh, well I said next to somebody in the plane that was like masked and I saw a double masker yesterday. And I had a little bit of a cold and I was thinking I'll probably cough once. I'll be like, man, it's game over. And I probably should have been vaccinated, you know, just to have some fun with them. But the, I mean, it's at the level of insanity of some of these people's extraordinary, but it's the, the key is can the legal system step up and answer? Well, let me, let me, let me bring that up actually, because here, here's when we get into the legal system and this is kind of something I was saying yesterday, just as a generality, when you talk about injustice, most people

CHAPTER 32 / 49 Discussion

Ron DeSantis and Florida Grand Jury Investigation into Pfizer

The sincerity of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is questioned based on whether his state grand jury actually holds Pfizer accountable. Bob Barnes claims there is systematic evidence of fraud in Pfizer's clinical trials across multiple countries, including Argentina and Israel. He compares Pfizer's "dirty" clinical trial sites to a poorly managed grocery store chain.

ron desantis· florida· grand jury· pfizer· clinical trials

1:46:13 And the key is if this fraud is exposed, that opens the door for them to be held accountable across the board. So we'll see. Now the other case that can hold Pfizer accountable is if the grand jury either in Florida that's currently open. And my encouragement is if DeSantis' people are sincere. And this is, we'll know whether DeSantis is a, whether he's a deep state guy or whether he's a legitimate populist guy by whether or not the state grand jury that he formed actually holds Pfizer accountable. Because there's zero doubt at this point, we've amassed all kinds of evidence with Brooke Jackson that Pfizer knew they were lying to the people of Florida. the

1:47:00 that they knew what they were doing was dangerous, that it was clearly altering various aspects of your body. Otherwise, it couldn't interfere with menstruation unless it was doing something to the very core of the body's function. It wasn't that, oh, maybe this will cause an infertility issue. It was that this goes beyond that. This goes to something's happening with this mRNA delivery platform that, again, and right in the contract, they said our mRNA platform is uniquely safe, uniquely effective. can be uniquely clinically tested in a quick and effective way. They were lying about all of it, and they knew they were lying about all of it.

1:47:50 So let alone injecting an experimental technology into them to see what that'll do to the chemistry. Well, now we know it was doing a lot of harm. Yeah. Oh, completely. And that they knew it all the way through. They knew it in test after test after test. There's more data coming out of Argentina. There's more data coming out of Israel. There's more data coming out of multiple countries. Whistleblowers continue to come forward, and we encourage them to continue to come forward. There are people who participate in these clinical trials all around the world who probably don't even realize what they saw was illegal. And that was one of Pfizer's arguments. Pfizer's argument as well was Brooke Jackson was there and she just saw one glimpse of it. The reality is she saw a clear window into the scope and scale and severity of their criminality and fraud. But they wanna say, don't worry, what she saw only happened in Texas. So they're trying to say, it's like if there's

1:48:40 10 grocery stores here, like a popular grocery store is H-E-B. So it's like you got 10 H-E-Bs here and I go down to one H-E-B which is maybe in a seedy area and it's kind of dirty and grungy and there's some, you know, seedy characters around and it's like... Well, that's just that one. That's only that H-E-B. But then I go to another one and I go to another one and I go to another one and it's the same thing. Grungy, dirty. By the way, I'm not saying that about H-E-B. I actually like the people at H-E-B. I got friends who work there. So just being clear. But I'm saying that's the analogy. It's like saying, no, no, no, it's just that one. But then you go to every single one and it's the exact same thing. It's why they want to deny all the discovery. Because they know if we looked at all the documents, it probably gets worse.

1:49:16 She was witnessing things she had never witnessed in her near 20 year career. I mean, she was just shocked and horrified at it at multiple levels. And that's how bad it was. And so that's why they don't want the world to know the truth. They don't want the world. We have alleged in our complaint that we will show that this was systematic and systemic all across the globe in their clinical trials. Pfizer lied, people died, time for discovery, time for liability. And now I guess the question is, is it gonna be like the FTX money? It's just gone. We just don't know. We don't know where the money is. Sorry. Well, we'll see if Pfizer gets away with it to that extent. Don't go anywhere. We'll be right back. All right. I want to get into some other topics here with Bob Barnes, who is going to be hosting the fourth hour, by the way.

CHAPTER 33 / 49 Discussion

Suppression of Brooke Jackson's Allegations and British Medical Journal

Bob Barnes details the immediate firing of Brooke Jackson after she reported clinical trial violations to the FDA in 2020. He notes that the British Medical Journal independently verified her claims, while the U.S. media and Biden administration worked to keep the case under seal for a year. The company Ventavia is accused of attempting to libel Jackson to suppress the story.

brooke jackson· british medical journal· fda· whistleblower· ventavia

1:50:01 But let's just kind of put a bow on this. What do you think the people need to know about this ongoing case against Pfizer? When or if is the next big break going to appear in the media or really? Where is the media? I mean, here you are with us. I'm not hearing anybody else cover your story. Anybody else reached out for comment? The institutional media has tried to avoid this case like the plague. And that's a sign of its strength. I mean, if the case was weak, we would have hit piece after hit piece after hit piece. So we don't, we have almost no coverage. There's been sort of blanket non-coverage. In fact, what happened here is once the Biden administration took over the case. So she filed her complaint or made the government aware of it back in the fall of 2020. And the same day she talked to the FDA and said, hey, look, there's a whole bunch of problems with these clinical trials. Later that same day, she summarily fired. You're gone, don't come back, don't ever come back into the office.

1:50:57 Then after that, she gets contacted by Pfizer's lawyer, who somehow knows her cell phone number that wasn't on the employment files. And so clearly there was a coordinated effort to try to suppress this. She hires counsel, the US government, the Biden administration says we're seriously investigating this. Well, we have to keep, so keep it sealed. Keep it under the federal court seal. Tells her lawyers don't talk about the case, don't discuss the case. Now legally you're entitled to discuss the facts of the case, not the existence of the case itself, but the underlying facts you're free to discuss. But that wasn't even relayed to her, she wasn't told that.

1:51:33 So for about a year, she's kept quiet by her prior lawyers, who it turns out have all kinds of conflicts involved in the case. And because the US government was saying that they were seriously investigating and gonna hold Pfizer accountable. And then on the eve of this motion to dismiss, the US government comes in and says, judge, please get rid of the case. It's like, well, what were you doing for a year? Were you lying to the judge? Were you lying to the American people? Were you lying to her about seriously investigating it in order to cover up the existence of these allegations for a year? So all of that would be subject to discovery. What we told the judges, we not only want discovery from Pfizer,

1:52:11 But because Pfizer is now claiming that the government would have approved this, even if the government knew it was a dangerous, ineffective gene therapy disguised as a vaccine that did not actually work for the prevention of COVID-19. Our position is we should be entitled to depose government officials as well. Well, yeah, and I guess they feel confident enough in the defense that that'll somehow, I guess, get them off. Like, hey, get off our back, go after the government. It's like how about we go after both of you? Completely, exactly. I mean, the fact that they may be complicitly in cahoots with high ranking corrupt members of the government is an ongoing damnation of both them and the government officials that could be implicated. Because the reason for this whole law is because Congress said, you know what, we cannot trust government bureaucrats

1:52:57 to protect against fraud. So we're gonna give the American people a direct right through what's called Ketam claims, False Claims Act, to bring that claim on behalf of the American people. That's why Brooke Jackson is the relator on behalf of the American people, on behalf of the United States against Pfizer. And the reason they did it is because we can't trust the government to do the right thing, unfortunately, too often in scandals, the scale and size of this one. Now, she also has a separate claim. My co-counsel, Lexis Anderson, made the argument in that part of the claim, which is the retaliatory discharge claim, so that she was fired as soon as she reported it to the FDA. And their only defense was, well, we don't know if that's why she was fired.

1:53:41 I mean, let's say she reports it to the FDA, get fired. It's pretty darn obvious what they- Have they offered an alternative reason as to why she was fired? None. Zero alternative reason as to why she was canceled. I mean, that's just straight laziness. I mean, they can't even come up with an excuse? Yeah, they- Like she was stealing sandwiches from the employee's fridge? Well, they were initially complicit in trying, the British Medical Journal covered, independently investigated Brooke Jackson's allegations. independently confirmed and verified the authenticity and the accuracy of her exhibits and affidavits. I think they've talked to other whistleblowers in addition to that. And so they came out with one of the most well-respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world, says Brooke Jackson's allegations are true and accurate about what Pfizer did. And it begins the British Medical Journal asking lots of questions about what's happening here.

1:54:29 But in that capacity, initially the company Ventavia that fired Brooke Jackson tries to libel and lie about her to try to other medical publications to try to limit the coverage the British medical journals publication got. In Europe, it got tons of coverage. In the United States, it didn't get as much coverage. And so we actually were talking about suing Vintavia for defamation and libel. They backed down, retracted some of their statements, etc. So they knew that lying was not going to be a long-term successful strategy for them. This, Brooke Jackson has an impeccable near 20 year record in the industry. Well, and yeah, it sounds to me the more I hear about this, and it's funny, Brooke Jackson is not a household name. She probably should be.

CHAPTER 34 / 49 Discussion

Brooke Jackson's Industry Background and "Referee" Analogy

Brooke Jackson is described as a 20-year industry veteran who originally believed in vaccines but was horrified by the "systemic criminality" she witnessed. Barnes uses an analogy of a basketball referee being told to count points differently for different teams to explain the fraud. He argues Pfizer rushed the trials to secure billions in taxpayer money while falsely claiming immunity.

brooke jackson· clinical trials· whistleblower· mrna· vaccine safety

1:55:10 Brooke Jackson is the hero of this case coming forward as a whistleblower and exposing the corruption that she was seeing in one of the biggest stories when it comes to medicine and pharmakea in US history with this vaccine. I mean, her name should be the household name. Absolutely. I mean, people can see her. She has a website. I am Brooke Jackson. She's on Twitter. I am Brooke Jackson. And she was willing to go public about all of this because they'd gone to great lengths to suppress and censor the existence of this story because she was someone you couldn't take apart. She's someone that's been in the industry almost 20 years. She was someone who had confidence and trust and belief in vaccines and pharmaceuticals or she wouldn't be in the industry.

1:55:49 She was someone who had overseen and supervised various aspects of clinical trials for a long time. She was someone who believed and wanted this vaccine to work and be effective. And so she had no incentive or motivation to lie about anything. And instead, she keeps reporting it, document it, report it, document it, report it, exactly what you're supposed to do. And that's why they were terrified that somebody that knew what was supposed to happen, because most of the people at that clinical trial, like the people being tested, they don't know what the rules are. They don't know what blinding is. They don't know what a placebo, how that works. They don't know what the testing requirements are. So it's like if you're a referee at a basketball game,

1:56:26 And the league, the commissioner calls you before the finals and says, hey, when the Chicago Bulls score, you're going to count that as three points. And when the Golden State Warriors score, you're going to count that as two points. And the ref would be like, hmm. This doesn't seem right. I'm gonna take note of this. I'm gonna blow the whistle on this. Exactly, and documented and reported all the way up the food chain. And she was shocked. And well, here's the thing. Many of the people that were in that food, that hierarchy, were confirming that this was systemic. And the reason why it was systemic was Pfizer lied from the very beginning. Pfizer's whole pitch was, you know what? We can create a unique system of clinical trial testing these pharmaceuticals that we can replicate in the future. That's why it was a protocol agreement under the defense agreement. We can create something unique that will provide for our enhanced national security for our soldiers down the way. Because we can accelerate the timetable for clinical trial success that has never been done in the history of clinical trials based on our knowledge.

1:57:22 our mRNA technology, but our mechanism of doing these trials. It was all a lie. They were just gonna rush through the whole clinical trial process, not follow any of the rules and regulations and restrictions to be able to pretend they could do it when they couldn't do it. Well, if I'm a layman hearing this, and forget about just all the stuff we know about the world and fighters history and all this. If I'm a layman and I'm hearing this, well, the story is pretty obvious at just a basic face value here. There was no way Pfizer could have guaranteed any of this. There was no way they could have guaranteed the vaccines would stop infection. There was no way they could have guaranteed that they were safe and effective. They said they were, and I guess the reason why they were so bold was because they knew they, well, they thought they had immunity. They thought that they could do this and be immune from lawsuits. And they saw the money. They saw the money sitting on the table. Well, why wouldn't we rush through this? We're gonna get billions of dollars and we're immune from lawsuits.

1:58:13 lawsuits they thought. It does say, it says too much about the industry. That she knew that in fact that the whole nature, that she was seeing one of the worst public health scandals, probably the worst public health scandal in world history. And she was a personal witness to it and she's at the front lines of it. And not long after she reports this, she's suddenly fired, then she has Pfizer's lawyer calling her at home, then all of a sudden her mail is being opened up before she even gets to receive it and read it.

1:58:54 all kinds of anomalies are happening. I am brookjackson.com for her story. Yep, you can get her whole story and follow her on Twitter as well. Well she's a real hero and Bob Barnes and his legal team, you got a lot of good hungry... Lawyers working for you on this case too that are doing great work. So folks we're gonna continue to monitor this story I do want to change lanes though when we come back with some other Developments as far as stopping drag queen story time. This is getting into a legal fight now Alright, the great Bob Barnes is in studio. He's gonna be hosting the fourth hour. I've got one more segment with him though I want to get into some other news stories now quickly before I get into

CHAPTER 35 / 49 Discussion

College Park Mayor Arrested for Child Pornography

The former mayor of College Park, Maryland, Patrick Wojohn, has been arrested on 56 counts of possession and distribution of child pornography. The host highlights Wojohn's connections to high-profile Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and Pete Buttigieg, suggesting a pattern of "sexual deviancy" within the modern left.

patrick wojohn· child pornography· pete buttigieg· nancy pelosi· college park

1:59:29 What I really want to get into with Bob here. Folks, this story about the mayor of College Park, Maryland is getting worse and worse. Democrat mayor arrested for possession and distribution of child pornography met with Nancy Pelosi, the Dalai Lama, Lady Gaga, hung out with Pete Booty Judge, and in fact was mentored by Pete Booty Judge. 56 counts, possession and distribution of child pornography. Now we know Lady Gaga is into the spirit cooking type stuff, as well as other Democrats revealed in the WikiLeaks emails. And I think we know plenty about Pete Bootyjudge, that he's mentoring this guy who turns out to be a pedophile charged with possession and distribution of child pornography. Distribution!

2:00:24 Distribution hangs out with Pete Booty Judge, hangs out with Nancy Pelosi. So they're gonna try to put this thing to rest. But between Sam Brinton, Pete Booty Judge and Patrick Wojohn, I think you're getting a pretty good idea what the modern day left is all about. Katie Hobbs and Arizona Republicans push out a CPS director who wants to stop child trafficking. Patrick Cowley has that story, we may bring him on next week to discuss it. I wanna, well we can get Bob's opinion on that or I wanna introduce this to him as well. Tennessee becomes first state to ban drag shows on public property near schools, banning public drag shows. And then I love this. I'll introduce it to you like this, Bob. This is from the Associated Press. As Tennessee and others target drag shows, many wonder why.

CHAPTER 37 / 49 Discussion

Pharmaceutical Marketing to Children and Memphis Crime

The host and Bob Barnes discuss the "insanity" of using characters like Elmo to market vaccines to children, noting that pharmaceutical marketing to minors was once illegal. They also revisit Gavin Newsom's comments on Tennessee, reiterating that the state's murder rate is a product of Democrat-run Memphis.

cdc· elmo· memphis· gavin newsom· tennessee

2:06:31 like the ones you're talking about. I mean, it's not a coincidence they keep showing up with child porn issues, sexual abuse issues, domestic violence issues. By the way, hasn't there been some legal precedent as far as like cigarette companies doing marketing aimed towards children or alcohol companies doing marketing aimed towards children and they usually win in court. In fact, I mean, up until a few years ago, it used to be illegal to promote pharmaceuticals to children. Now, of course, they got little Elmo out there saying, hey, get your little vaccine shot. I mean, the level of insanity has just gone off the charts. And that case, we'll have to take to the appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals because the federal judge in Waco said nobody can sue, which we think is a problem.

2:07:11 All of this, another area where legislative reform needs to take place because it's something that's gone beyond all norms, all boundaries. I mean, you're seeing these little kids go to school boards, talk out loud about the crazy crap that's in their library. Reading from the books. I mean, remember we used to go to the store, they used to hide Playboy behind like the thing, you know, like the little brown thing. Oh, I always bring it up. My school library at my elementary school would always get the Guinness Book of World Records every new year it came out and the kids loved it. We loved the Guinness Book of Records. It was fun. And then there was one year, I think it was 2000 or 2001, they put in the world's biggest breasts.

2:07:50 And on page 99, I may even still remember the page. On page 99, it was this woman in a bikini with her gigantic breasts and what do you know, the guys liked looking at it. We liked looking at the breasts. And so eventually the teachers found out and you know what they did? They ripped the page out of the book. Simple as that, problem solved. Now they'd probably say, hey, let's bring in the biggest breasted woman in the world and have her do a little strip tease for you. Yeah, well, I mean, especially these books that are basically how-to books on how to groom a child. I mean, that's what some of these books are. They're grooming mechanisms. I mean, they have no business being in a public library. They have no business being in... And I'm someone that's a robust supporter of free speech.

2:08:28 but we've always recognized the right to protect children. going to go ahead and guess that most of those murders are happening in Memphis run by Democrats and the rest of the state's probably pretty safe. I don't know what do you think? Oh, I mean, I'm from Tennessee, so it's all going to be Democrat run cities where the crime is number one. Number two, does anybody think you're safer in LA, in San Francisco these days, almost anywhere in coastal California than you are in the countryside of Tennessee?

2:09:12 there's nobody who really thinks that there's nobody who thinks, Oh, I'm going to, well, what about Gavin Newsom? Well, yeah. Other than Gavin, the, I mean, Gavin is invited to Tennessee anytime he wants to hang out in north Memphis for a couple of nights. Yeah. They have some fun. Well, they'll, they'll be nice to Gavin in Tennessee. They have no problems. He, you know, just as long as he doesn't dress up as a woman and try to get their kids on his lap. I think, I think, I think that Gavin Newsom should prove how bad Tennessee is or how good it is maybe by going to Democrat-run Memphis and he can see just how safe it is. Hang out with Congressman Cohen. And then you can find out how Tennessee became the eighth murder capital of the United States. It's not because of red areas, blue areas. Right now, I'm not talking to the viewers and listeners.

CHAPTER 38 / 49 Discussion

Constitutional Requirements for the WHO Pandemic Treaty

Bob Barnes explains the constitutional hurdles for the proposed WHO Pandemic Treaty, noting it requires two-thirds Senate approval and implementing legislation from the House. He argues that even if signed, the treaty cannot override the Bill of Rights. The treaty is criticized for attempting to control global supply chains and equity distribution under the guise of health.

world health organization· treaty· constitution· senate· bill of rights

2:10:53 Just got through with some various arguments in the various courts in Texas, and we'll see how all those turn out. The reason why the vaccine issue goes beyond just this vaccine or this particular drug company in the case of Pfizer, or goes beyond just some of the issues involving COVID-19 and pandemic response, we're seeing in the World Health Organization's proposed treaty. Now, there's been various statements out there that have suggested this treaty could be constitutionally enforceable without Senate approval. That is not true. Now, that does not mean that they won't try to do something like that. But to be very clear, our founders established in the Constitution that no treaty can be governing law in the United States unless it meets two prior prerequisites.

2:11:40 The first one is the Senate must, two-thirds of the Senate must consent and agree to the treaty before it is passed. So the process is first you have your sort of diplomats or other officials from the executive branch sign the treaty. Then they take that and the president must propose the treaty to the United States Senate. The United States Senate then must debate it, discuss it, and vote upon it. Often the way most treaties through history get buried is the Senate never votes on it or the president never submits it. This kind of happened with the Paris Accords. So you had President Obama sign something, and I'll get into when an executive agreement has certain enforceability rules in just a second. But the President Obama never submitted it in some cases to the Senate because he knew the Senate would reject it.

2:12:30 Other ones that were proposed to the Senate, the Senate never even voted upon and thus died a slow death, kind of a pocket veto as it's described in some cases when the executive branch is in that role. But that's the first part. But even then, and so even if the President sign it, the President deliver it, the President propose it, the Senate debate it, and the Senate sign it, they're still not implementing legislation to make its terms enforceable as law under the Constitution in the United States. That requires a second requirement. So first requirement, president approved, president proposed, two-thirds of the Senate agree. Second part of the proposal, the House must propose implementing legislation. The House must then pass that implementing legislation by majority vote. The Senate must then pass that and the President must also separately sign that. That's the second precondition for enforceable constitutional treaties in the United States. But it's not all.

2:13:26 Because it also still must be constitutional. What does that mean? It means that a treaty is seen as basically equal to a federal statute or an executive action in the sense that it is subject to and subordinate to the US Constitution and its other requirements. What are some of those other requirements? Those other requirements include all of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. So to give an example, there is a role for the judicial branch to play if somebody brings a legal challenge to the treaty and the implementing legislation on the grounds that it violates some Bill of Rights provision.

2:14:05 such as the First Amendment right of press or speech or association or religion or the right to petition your government. There are provisions in this World Health Organization treaty that do in fact violate core First Amendment rights in the Constitution. Now there's a little provision of this by the way. That in the World Health Organization Treaty, that it requires that it be passed a consistent to the constitution of each governing state. What does that mean? It means our constitution is superimposed as conditions, limitations and restrictions on the World Health Organization Treaty itself under our constitutional standards and under the plain language of the proposed treaty itself.

2:14:43 But so the who else can bring a challenge is not only any of those provisions. There's second amendment right of self-defense issues implicated by the World Health Organization Treaty. Fourth amendment issues against wrongful searches or seizures without probable cause of a crime or done unreasonable. Fifth amendment rights to due process of law concerning property or liberty. Fifth amendment rights to no property being taken without just compensation. Sixth amendment rights seven

2:15:21 Healthcare, this is a key component in provision as well. So when we get back, we'll discuss a little bit more about the real dangers of the World Health Organization treaty, but also the real constitutional solutions available to us to stop this from becoming enforceable law in the United States. The dangers are real, but so are the remedies. And it's time for humanity to stand up in the info war and say, I don't know what's going to happen at the end of this, but you want to fight, you better believe you've got one! From the front lines of the information war, it's Alex Jones.

CHAPTER 39 / 49 Discussion

Corporate Censorship and the Crusade Against Alex Jones

The host discusses how corporations and big tech are being used as an "avenue" for censorship that the government cannot legally perform. Alex Jones is described as the "most prominent casualty" of this crusade. CNN is accused of actively working with Facebook to ban independent voices and undermine the First Amendment.

alex jones· censorship· big tech· first amendment· cnn

2:16:22 Well, the Bill of Rights is a stumbling block on the way to shutting down speech that the left doesn't like, at least in government. But there's a new avenue for those who would like to censor what you say and think, and that's corporations. The left have wised up to this. If you want to stop someone, from telling the truth use companies to do it, the social media giants, and they are. For many on the left, the view seems to have become that if you can't beat them, prevent them from speaking. So far the most prominent casualty of the crusade against free expression has been the radio show host Alex Jones. There is a concerted effort by the Democratic Party and multinational corporations and big tech

2:17:01 to silence conservative and nationalist and populist voices. There's also guys on CNN that spend their whole day calling Facebook and saying, can you ban this person? He may be America's best-known conspiracy theorist, but this week, Alex Jones' content will be a little harder to find. Shame on the mainstream corporate media for not defending the First Amendment, but instead attack-dogging, calling for federal regulators to shut down independent free press working with big tech. People know what's true. They can smell it. InfoWars, the most banned network in the world. In a free country, everyone can be heard. In totalitarian societies, only the powerful can be heard.

CHAPTER 40 / 49 Discussion

InfoWars Audience Support and Independent Media Growth

Bob Barnes credits the InfoWars audience for keeping the network alive and enabling the growth of other platforms like Rumble and Locals. He notes that while corporate media ignored the Brooke Jackson hearing, the courtroom was filled with independent media and InfoWars listeners. He encourages continued shopping at the InfoWars Store to defy those trying to shut the show down.

infowars· rumble· locals· alex jones· independent media

2:17:49 Welcome back to the Alex Jones Show. Robert Barnes here guest hosting with Alexis Anderson here with me in studio. She had the privilege this week of making her first oral argument in any federal case concerning the case of Brooke Jackson and the way in which she was retaliated against in her employment. And we'll be discussing that and more as the rest of the show proceeds. One important thing to recognize in all of this, as the intro talked about, is that the key to independent information getting out there, the key to whistleblowers finding out about this case that the mainstream and corporate media has mostly taken great efforts to suppress.

2:18:27 the most important consequential case arguably in the world that could expose and hold accountable those drug companies like Pfizer that lied in order to be able to get this vaccine, so-called vaccine out there into the mass public to basically drug up. the mass world population with a drug that turned out to be dangerous, ineffective, wasn't a vaccine, was basically a gene therapy that did not in fact prevent COVID-19 is because of InfoWars. It's because of your audience, it's because of you and to continue to support InfoWars at infowarsstore.com. What was supposed to happen a long time ago with the war waged on Alex Jones was first to take him out.

2:19:11 And the goal was to take out InfoWars itself, the existence of it, the network, the people, the audience, the various people who help create content here. And then to use it as an example to intimidate and terrorize other independent content creators from even broaching into this space. to trust to be able to make the claims of safety and efficacy that they falsely made to the Trump Defense Department to secure billions of dollars for what was in fact a very dangerous drug that was often through mandates then forced upon people around the world.

2:20:02 And so that is only possible, the only reason why none of that happened. The only reason why the independent content creation continues to expand and even explode in places like Rumble, in places like Locals, and a wide range of diverse technological platforms that are out there. is solely and wholly because of you, the audience keeping InfoWars on air. You keeping Alex Jones's voice to be heard. Your ability not only in sharing the links and supporting the network, but by supporting it by buying things that make yourself healthier, wealthier, and wiser in the process. That is why continue to go to infowarsstore.com, find something that you like. I've been buying there for the better part of two decades.

2:20:45 Find something that you already need, that you already want, often at a more affordable price than you can get anywhere else for the quality that you get. You can read all of the reviews that are on there. It's some of the most well-liked, well-reviewed products of any company in the world. And they're products that are designed to compete with companies like Big Pharma. by being able to use natural supplements that are not dependent on big drug companies, that are not dependent on certain patented protections, that are not dependent upon these corrupt entities who wish to control us rather than empower us.

2:21:21 and you are allowing InfoWars, the network itself, to continue to exist just by finding things that you like that are there. Whether it's things to help your brain focus, help you wake up, help you get to sleep, help you process food, help make your body just health care. That was no less true of the Brooke Jackson hearing. While the big corporate media was running away and was scared to be in the courtroom to cover the case, there were many independent media members who were there and wanted to cover the case. And it included disproportionately members of the Infowars audience. So whether it's Brain Force Plus or anything else, that's a product I bought, the Bone Broth is a product I bought, a wide range of products that I bought, all happy and satisfied with them over the many years.

CHAPTER 41 / 49 Discussion

The Power of Individual Resistance and Revolutionary Spirit

Bob Barnes compares the current struggle for free speech to the Battle of Bunker Hill, urging the audience to "hold the line." He argues that the "greatest trick the system ever pulled" is convincing people they cannot resist. Buying products from the InfoWars Store is framed as a meaningful act of individual resistance against the "swamp" in Washington D.C.

bunker hill· revolutionary war· infowars store· resistance· individual action

2:22:21 There are things on there that you can find that you like, that you enjoy, that you need, that are more affordable, more accessible anywhere else. The quality is unbeatable. That keeps InfoWars on the air. And as long as InfoWars is alive, it reminds me of what my great-great-great granddaddy said at Bunker Hill, don't shoot until you see the whites of their eyes. by keeping Bunker Hill alive, even though they didn't win that battle that day, we won the Revolutionary War in part because people held the line. So as long as the audience at InfoWars continues to hold the line by supporting InfoWars and InfoWarsStore.com, you are taking a critical essential step. Because that's one of the things many people ask me, what can I do to make a difference? What can I do to support what's happening?

2:23:04 Well, one of the key ways you can do it is continuing to shop at Infowarsstore.com. You heard the lawyers in Connecticut after they won the case, a case that was a disgrace to the rule of law in America of billions of dollars of so-called damages. They made clear their goal wasn't to collect a penny in damages. Their goal was to shut Infowars down. And they said, you Infowars audience, now is the time to stop buying from Infowarsstore.com. So there's no better way of paying them back by continuing to support Infowarsstore.com. There's no better way to prevent them from their real objective of those bogus claims brought in a courtroom that was contaminated from beginning to end in those proceedings than to continue to keep Infowars on the air, alive, by supporting it at Infowarsstore.com.

2:23:53 And so I thank all of you for doing so. That's as critical as anything else out there. You cannot underestimate it. The government didn't have FBI agents dedicated to doing nothing more than watching InfoWars affiliated accounts on Twitter, some of our Facebook or other social media sites. Some of them had 25 followers, 50 followers. And a lot of times ordinary people forget the real power, the real import, the real consequence their own individual actions can have. I like to say that the greatest trick the devil ever pulled is convincing people he did not exist. The greatest trick the system ever pulled is convincing people you cannot resist.

2:24:32 When you realize you can, when you realize how much power there is in your own individual action with something as simple, something as straightforward as buying a product you need and you want at an affordable, accessible price that keeps networks like InfoWars on the line, you realize the power you have is real. The power you have is palpable. You are just as important and as significant as the person standing in front of that tank in Tenement Square. And chances are you'll have more success than they did at being able to recreate the world in an image reflective of our founders and not the corrupt politicians who dominate Washington DC in the swamp today.

2:25:08 That is what all of this is about. So thank you for continuing to support InfoWars. I encourage you to continue to do so. Go to infowarsstore.com today. Find something you like, find something a friend would like, find something a family member would like, find something a neighbor would like. and get it, continue to keep InfoWars on the air, continue to keep the revolution alive, continue to keep our founders' dreams at the forefront of the American liberty experiment. And when we come back, more on the WHO treaty and more. Welcome back to the Alex Jones Show. This is Robert Barnes in guest hosting with Alexis Anderson here in studio. We're gonna be discussing a little bit later the World Health Organization Treaty, its potential ramifications and implications, why it may reach into

CHAPTER 42 / 49 Discussion

Alexis Anderson on Law School and Vaccine Mandate Advocacy

Young attorney Alexis Anderson describes her transition from environmental law to vaccine mandate advocacy after witnessing the "COVID scam" in 2020. She discusses the difficulties of practicing law in a "liberal" education system and encourages other young lawyers to represent underdogs and dissidents rather than soul-crushing big law firms.

alexis anderson· law school· vaccine mandates· maine· environmental law

2:25:53 governing our economy, governing self-defense issues, why I believe it interferes with a range of constitutional rights, and how those constitutional rights are in fact a means of protecting against the World Health Organization treaty, despite some language people may have heard about some efforts to circumvent it by the Biden administration. We'll be discussing that a little bit later. But first, Alexis, so you're a young lawyer. What led you to be interested in going into this space in terms of public advocacy about issues about vaccine mandates, issues about the public health consequences of Brooke Jackson's whistleblower suit, things like that?

2:26:28 Of course, well, I really do have to credit InfoWars to some extent because it was through their coverage of the 2020 COVID scam that led me to realize what an issue this was legally. I was in law school in Maine at the time. I was a second year law student when COVID hit and everything got shut down and all of a sudden I was doing virtual Zoom law school. And businesses were being shut down, the state was shut down, and nobody in my sphere was talking about the legal ramifications of any of this. None of my professors, none of my fellow classmates. And I'm sitting there thinking, surely there are issues here that are gonna have to come up. And so as we saw that the crazy grab of power that year.

2:27:12 Everyone knew that there was going to be a vaccine coming. Everyone knew that there were going to be vaccine mandates and InfoWars was one of the first people to actually come out and say, you need to watch out for this. This is something that's going to happen. And it was at that moment that I realized I was in school to be an environmental attorney at the time. That was kind of my plan. I realized that there are such big issues that are coming down the pipeline and I couldn't not try to contribute. And so it was really the vaccine mandates, the pending vaccine mandates that caused me to get involved in this type of advocacy. And I had discovered you through watching InfoWars and their coverage of the 2020 election.

2:27:50 And there was just no turning back at that point. And so when it came time for me to graduate, I was still in virtual law school. I decided to get out of Maine and try to find a job that aligned with my values. Because one, I didn't want to be subjected to a vaccine mandate at a liberal law firm. And two, there didn't seem to be any other causes out there that I'd rather dedicate my time to. And what has been sort of the biggest hurdle or surprise or difficulty in the actual practice of law since you've begun to practice? I mean, some of your illusions of the law are definitely shattered doing this kind of work. You go through three years of law school and they teach you the theory of what practicing law will be like. And then you get out into the world and these political cases and these controversial cases. And even when you have the perfect case, the law is clear,

2:28:41 It's still an uphill battle. You're facing all of these impediments because it's just such a contentious issue and it shouldn't be. None of these vaccine mandate cases should be in contentious issue. It should not be political. But that's been very surprising and discouraging at times to see, okay, we should be right, we're right morally, ethically, legally, and you still have to fight it out in court and hope that you, to some extent, get lucky. And if there are other young students out there going into law school or maybe in law school thinking about entering the practice of law, what advice would you give them about continuing to pursue the things that matter to them? In terms of principles, in terms of values, continuing to represent maybe outsiders, maybe underdogs, maybe dissidents, maybe people that are not as politically privileged or protected as the political classes or corporations or others are.

2:29:36 What would be your advice to them about maintaining their beliefs, finding a means of practicing law that's ethical, that's moral, that's principled, that advances their values? What would be your advice to them? I think it's more important now than ever that people are willing to take the leap to maybe get out of the accepted sphere of what success looks like in the legal world. So a lot of my classmates, they want to work for one of these big law firms, work for a governmental agency, something with great notoriety and that looks great on a resume, and they don't want something that's going to get public pushback or perhaps garner reputation one way or another.

2:30:18 But right now, if you have these motivations and these values, and you see problems in the world, now is the time that we have to step up. Because there are so few attorneys willing to do this. And I talk to young attorneys out there and we'll compare experiences in our careers. And I'm told all the time how lucky I am to get to do this because they'll be on the other side. They're representing big corporations, big employers. They don't feel good about the work that they're doing. They don't go home and be like, wow, I really fought for the underdog today, fought for people like me. This is great. They put in these long hours and do soul crushing work and it's kind of discouraging for them. And so they look at my job and think, wow, that's amazing you get to do that. So there are young attorneys out there who do feel this way. I think there's certainly a failing in our legal education system. It's so liberal now, and I'm into a liberal law school, and so that was my experience.

CHAPTER 43 / 49 Discussion

Litigation Against 3M, Tyson and Madison Square Garden

Alexis Anderson details ongoing lawsuits against major companies like 3M and Tyson Foods for religious and disability discrimination related to vaccine mandates. She highlights cases where employees were placed on "unpaid leave" as a fake accommodation. A new lawsuit against Madison Square Garden is also mentioned.

3m· tyson foods· madison square garden· religious discrimination· ada

2:31:17 Just like all higher education systems, even the law schools are leaning that way. And so they're not being introduced to these issues. I guarantee if they touch upon vaccine mandate cases, they're probably portrayed very differently than how I perceive them. But there are good young lawyers out there. So if you're one of them and you see what's going on, I encourage you just get in touch with attorneys that are doing this kind of work. See how you can participate maybe just doing research because there aren't enough of us out there and there needs to be a full force of people willing to take these cases. And can you describe for people the some of the vaccine mandate cases that you're working on? What about it? The vaccine mandate is illegal, how it does violate people's rights, how they do have a right to remedy in the process, how they need to exercise it.

2:32:03 in a timely manner. Can you describe for people what some of their rights are if they're subject or a loved one is subject to a vaccine mandate? Sure, so we have a number of cases ongoing right now, many against 3M company, many against Tyson. Another one we just filed last week against Madison Square Garden. And what's so striking about these is just how these companies just double down on their employees. Many of whom had worked there for decades. So the claims that we're bringing are claims for religious discrimination, primarily and disability discrimination. Religious discrimination, many of these people in the case of Tyson were granted a religious exemption and then placed on one year of unpaid leave as their accommodation. Anyone who is rational and honest with themselves knows that that's absolutely ridiculous and tantamount to termination.

2:32:57 And a lot of other companies just outright denied people's religious exemptions, no matter how sincere, how thorough they were, whether they gave affidavits from religious institutions. A lot of just absolutely no exemptions as an option. So we're helping people. And a lot of these companies, they try to say, well, we just didn't find a sincere religious belief. When it is not even in the company's purview to be able to determine whether that's the true or not. And then of course, they try to claim, well, you're burdening everyone else at the company when the vaccine is neither safe or effective, increases your chance of getting COVID and comes with a whole host of other problems.

2:33:39 Everyone knows that that is also a ridiculous excuse as well. And then on the other side for disability, we're arguing that people who are perceived as being disabled because of their unvaccinated status and discriminated on that basis as well. Exactly, and for those that are interested in some of the more vaccine cases that are coming about, there is a Vaccine Safety Research Foundation conference by Steve Kirsch's organization that will be in Atlanta, Georgia toward the end of March. You can look that up at the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation. When we come back, we'll be talking about the World Health Organization's treaties and the threats it poses to America's constitutional order and ways in which our constitution provides answers to its dangers. Welcome back to the Alex Jones Show. Robert Barnes guest hosting here in studio with Lexis Anderson, discussing the World Health Organization treaty and what risk it may pose.

CHAPTER 44 / 49 Discussion

EEOC Filing Requirements for Vaccine Discrimination

Alexis Anderson explains the critical administrative requirement of filing a complaint with the EEOC within six months of a discriminatory act (usually termination). Failure to meet this deadline can preclude a lawsuit under Title VII or the ADA. Bob Barnes adds that they are also exploring "assault" theories for those who missed the administrative deadlines.

eeoc· title vii· vaccine mandates· discrimination· statute of limitations

2:34:32 Discussing those people that have been injured by vaccines, what might be some of the remedies. Those who have been injured by vaccine mandates and what might be some of the remedies there. You were discussing Title VII claims that are brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act or the Civil Rights Act concerning religious discrimination and other forms of impermissible discrimination. Some of these have a disparate racial impact, so there's that aspect. Some have had a disparate gender impact. But can you describe for people, one of the things most people don't know is that in order to protect their rights under those federal laws, and sometimes there's state analog versions that have their own provisions, but that they have to go to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or the state equivalent thereof within a certain time frame. Can you describe for people when they need to go to the EEOC if they fear that

2:35:22 or feel that they have basically had some of their rights violated due to a vaccine mandate. Absolutely, so if you've been discriminated against, it's really important that you file a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission within six months of the time you were discriminated against. So typically, the time you were terminated but not always. This is a requirement in order to bring claims, a lawsuit, under Title VII or the Americans with Disabilities Act. If you don't go through that process with the state agency or as you mentioned, the parallel state agency or the federal agency, then you can be precluded from bringing suit entirely.

2:36:01 So this is something that a lot of people didn't realize at the inception of all of this, that there was this huge administrative hurdle and process that you have to get through before you can even bring a lawsuit. Exactly, now that does not mean that you don't have any remedies if you're out of time for that, you might have the right to bring suit. We are challenging some novel interpretations of the law. arguing that for certain and some state laws have only passed recently. So sometimes those provide a remedy. We're also seeking remedy under the assault laws because if you were at your employer and your employer said, you know what, in order to keep your job, you got to go down through a gang initiation, have the crap kicked out of you before you come back. Isn't that a conspiracy to commit an assault, tort of an assault? So

CHAPTER 45 / 49 Discussion

Nuremberg Code and Seventh Amendment Challenges

Bob Barnes discusses using the Nuremberg Code to challenge vaccine mandates as illegal medical experimentation. He also argues that federal immunity for drug companies may violate the Seventh Amendment right to a trial by jury for "basic torts" like assault and invasion of bodily autonomy.

nuremberg code· seventh amendment· trial by jury· medical experimentation· immunity

2:36:42 Our argument is that's what a vaccine mandate is. They want your body invaded with a foreign substance that can do a lot more damage to you than any gang initiation could as a condition of employment. So we're bringing those claims. We're also bringing claims under the Nuremberg Code. For those that may not remember, this was the Nuremberg Code arose from the trials at Nuremberg. And the principle was, on what basis were we going to prosecute German doctors and German military officials and soldiers and prison camp folks? On what grounds are we going to prosecute them when they didn't violate their own country's laws?

2:37:18 What was our basis to do so? Not only did we prosecute them, we in many cases convicted them and executed them. Well, what was the grounds to do so? Well, what we established at Nuremberg was that there is an international code of certain universal truths that are what might be called and what is called in the law just Kogans under the old Latin international standards, so universal, so automatic. That they are so true that they can be enforced by anybody, anywhere, anytime. That's the principle behind it. Our argument is when you are effectively medically experimenting on a population through mandates of an experimental drug, which is the case with these vaccine mandates.

2:38:03 that that is a Nuremberg Code violation and that any individual should have the right to enforce it. Now, a lot of the courts don't want to. They only want the government to be able to enforce the Nuremberg Code. They don't want assault theories to be brought. So they've been somewhat reluctant or hostile, but those are some of the other additional remedies that may be available. Now we're also looking at what we can do for the vaccine injured. Can you explain to people, why is it already so difficult for people to get remedy if they've been injured by this vaccine in particular? Well, because it was brought under emergency use authorization. So you have all of these laws insulating the manufacturers, insulating anyone who requires this vaccine from suit because of all of these legal loopholes. Exactly, and that's where

2:38:57 Some of the law needs to be changed, but we are looking at ways you can bring suits for remedy or relief if you've been injured by a vaccine. We're looking at whether or not you can bring suits under the assault and Nuremberg Code provisions we mentioned earlier, that we believe may trump in certain provisions the various immunity exceptions that exist. We're looking at whether you can challenge the immunity exceptions as itself unconstitutional, as violating your rights to, for example, to trial by jury. Under the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution, and then as enforceable under both the Tenth and Fourteenth Amendments, various state constitutional provisions give you a right to trial by jury. And what that includes is even the courts recognize, I would have a more robust interpretation of it than the courts do. But the courts recognize that at least that includes anything you had a right to trial by jury to at the time of our Constitution.

2:39:51 Well, basic torts like assault, basic torts like invasion of your bodily autonomy, basic torts like invasion of privacy, recognized in one way, shape or form, like say a trespass claim, all the way back to the time of our founding, said you had a right to a trial by jury on that. Can Congress really take away that right and provide special immunity either to themselves or to the government or to the big drug and big pharmaceutical companies or others who are involved in the administration of this dangerous drug?

CHAPTER 46 / 49 Discussion

CDC Vaccine Schedule and Children's Health Defense

The inclusion of the COVID-19 vaccine in the CDC's recommended schedule for children is discussed as a "trigger" for state school requirements. Alexis Anderson notes that states like Maine have removed personal exemptions. They announce a partnership with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Children's Health Defense to bring legal challenges against these mandates.

cdc· robert f. kennedy jr.· children's health defense· school requirements· maine

2:40:27 our their kid in their state potentially. Sure, so the CDC puts out a list of recommended vaccinations for children. And it's a whole schedule of what vaccine they should get at what age. I think it totals about 70 something by the time they're 18, it's gotten excessively long. So they just recommended that children get the COVID vaccine. And this is a problem because many states will use that as a guideline for school requirements.

2:41:11 And now if you're a state, like I grew up in Maine, they removed personal exemptions in 2018. And so kids in schools there, you can no longer just say, I don't want it because I don't want it. And they don't have to accept that anymore. You have to have either medical or religious exemption. And in fact, in some states, I guess they're even taking away the religious exemption. Exactly, exactly. So this is a really big problem because for schools that just either automatically adopt the CDC's recommended schedule or who just use it as a guideline and add it because the CDC said that we should do it. Obviously, we should require it for our students. You're talking that you're gonna have five-year-olds

2:41:49 on a schedule getting COVID vaccines and no recourse. And obviously, people, not everybody can homeschool their kids or send them to private school. And so you're gonna have all of these young kids forced injected with a dangerous drug. And can you describe that we're working with Robert Kennedy at Children's Health Defense to try to bring legal relief to stop that from happening? Yes, so for the states where there might be an automatic trigger for adding the COVID vaccine to the required vaccinations for schools because of the CDC's adding it to their recommended list. We're gonna try to bring suit along with Children's Health Defense to challenge that on behalf of students who might be adversely impacted.

CHAPTER 47 / 49 Discussion

Alex Jones' Predictions and Amos Miller's Organic Farm

Bob Barnes praises Alex Jones for predicting the current globalist agenda and mentions the success of his book, "The Great Reset." He also highlights the case of Amos Miller, an Amish farmer being targeted by the USDA, and encourages listeners to support Miller's organic farm as a form of resistance against government control of the food supply.

alex jones· the great reset· amos miller· usda· organic farming

2:42:31 Indeed, basically it's the world that many of you probably saw coming but many others did not. And the reason why many of you probably saw it coming is you're familiar or you've been following Alex from many, many decades. And whether you read his book, The Great Reset, which is well cited, well quoted, has a lot of documentation. The reason why on the back of it has a lot of very favorable quotes from a wide range of influential intellectuals in American society is because what he has been talking about here What Russell Brand just yesterday was talking to Joe Rogan about just the other day is that Alex Jones has been predicting many of these things for a long time, to be on alert for him for a long time, to be recognizing the risk when it comes. It is not a coincidence.

2:43:14 That it was the Infowars audience that was at the tip of the spear and at the very front, at the very inception of all of the protests and rallies all across America to try to prevent the lockdowns from becoming institutionalized permanently. It's not a coincidence that when I was in court yesterday, arguing with Lexis Anderson on behalf of Brooke Jackson, many of the people in that courtroom were members of the Infowars audience. You are the ones who have kept these information at the front of people's minds so they can be on the lookout for what might happen. You are our modern day Paul Revere. Continue to help make that possible by going to infowarestore.com and supporting and buying products that make that practicable. When we come back, the World Health Organization and its new treaty to try to control everything everywhere.

2:44:05 Welcome back to the Alex Jones show. This is a Robert Barnes guest hosting here in studio with Lexus Anderson. We were earlier last this earlier this week, actually arguing for Brooke Jackson, the brave whistleblower who exposed the Pfizer fraud and corruption in the billions of dollars they obtained from the American people based on their lives that led to people dying. Pfizer lied, people died, and we are now requesting discovery in that case to proceed accordingly. If you wanna follow Brooke Jackson, you can at IamBrookeJackson.com or at IamBrookeJackson on social media. She has been a very brave whistleblower who's been willing to risk her entire career and more to bring these truths out to the American people.

2:44:50 In addition, if you're concerned or curious about vaccine injuries and various legal remedies for it, Steve Kirsch's organization, Vaccine Research Safety Foundation is presenting a conference that I will be attending along with others in Atlanta. There are still tickets available for those who wish to attend and get insights and information about how we may go about protecting and remedying those people who have suffered injury from these dangerous drugs disguised as vaccines. over the last several years. And that is where you can go for that as well. And of course, if you want some farm fresh milk or other great products, you can support that at another client of mine, Amos Miller at amosmillerorganicfarm.com. Best milk I've ever had. I am a, I get it

2:45:39 every time I can when I'm in town. Amos Miller is the Amish farmer who just wants to make food the way his family and the way his ancestors have been making it for hundreds of years. But the U.S. Department of Agriculture has made his life very difficult over the last five years trying to superimpose their rules and regulations and restrictions on him. They want to control what goes into our bodies, just like they're trying to do it through our medicine. They want to do it through our food supply. He makes food the way that has been safe and good and effective and delicious.

2:46:14 for centuries and that's what his consumers want. Many of them need it for medical purposes. Others require it for spiritual and religious purposes. And yet that is being interfered with by the Department of Agriculture. You can help support Amos and keep his farm alive by buying things like farm fresh milk or great cheeses or yogurts or a whole bunch of other stuff that's just fantastic. at amismillerorganicfarm.com. Now, in just a second, we will get to what are some of the risks and issues with the various WHO treaty proposals currently there. But what is your favorite product from InfoWare Store?

CHAPTER 48 / 49 Discussion

WHO Treaty Special Report: Eugenics and Global Sovereignty

A special report by John Bowne claims the WHO treaty is a "silent kill strategy" aimed at reducing the global population. The report alleges the treaty would hand over U.S. sovereignty to a "global health police" funded by Bill Gates and the Chinese Communist Party. It suggests that government officials working on the draft are committing "high treason."

world health organization· eugenics· bill gates· china· high treason

2:46:56 Oh, there are so many. My pantry is chock full. I will say on Wednesday when we did oral argument in Beaumont, I definitely took more than the recommended dose of brain force ultra prior to walking into that courtroom. So that's one of my favorites that invite a mineral fusion every morning without a fail. I take that. There you go. Make yourself healthier, wealthier and wiser and keep info wars on the air by going to info war store.com. Well, what about this world health organization treaty? Well, let's look at a special report and we'll discuss it when we come back from it. Let's play SP1. The eugenics is just getting started. The elites managed to eliminate a fraction of the populace they must destroy through the virus and vaccines.

2:47:48 surpassing the genocide of Nazi Germany. All over the Western world we are seeing very large measurable increases in unexplained deaths. The BBC in Great Britain, for example, just reported that quote, excess deaths in 2022 are among the worst in 50 years. And does it damage the brain? You bet it does. Does it damage the heart? Yes. The liver? Yes. The bone marrow? Yes. It causes all sorts of harm in the human body. We should have stopped this before it ever started. I'm seeing tremendous apathy. I'm seeing deaths, as you've mentioned, but no one seems to care. The family expresses no outrage. The obituaries don't mention the cause of death. It's just that, you know, a 24-year-old died and that's it. The clinical trials were never ordered.

2:48:32 The good manufacturing practice compliance was never ordered. And legally speaking, there were never even clinical trial subjects or investigators because if you cannot have an investigational product, then there is no investigation. So FDA leadership and then global regulatory leadership, what they did, they impersonated the regulators so that you fall for this lie and go get injected. Pfizer already in court, stated that, please dismiss this case, Judge. We did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered. However, their common goal is to reduce humans from nearly 8 billion people to a manageable slave populace of 500 million. We cannot hide away from human population growth.

2:49:25 Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago. And so, even though the pandemic has been largely exposed as a manufactured event, the elitists push forward, hedging their bets on more genocide as their silent kill strategy stumbles through its engineered propaganda. equity and the fundamental right to health for all people. A public health emergency of international concern or a FHIC is defined by the IHR as an extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other states, to the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response. This year in 2023 we may still be in a pandemic for quite some time because this virus is here with us to stay.

2:50:36 which means we have to take measured action, we have to improve all of our system to be able to reduce the impact of COVID-19 as we go forward. It's a global treaty, they want 127 nations to sign it and basically does hand over kind of our sovereignty, there's no other way to put it, to what will be a kind of a global health police. and giving all of the decision-making to the World Health Organization, which of course is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation disproportionately, and their best friends, the Chinese Communist Party. The contract of the new draft is against the Constitution of America, against the laws and protection of human rights of America, etc., etc., etc. The law in America says whoever conspires to aim or work towards the goal to undermine the security

2:51:25 the dignity or the integrity of the constitution of the United States of America is committing high treason. Find out who from your government worked on that draft. and then go for high treason, then you have the army behind you. The World Health Organization pandemic treaties, deeply concerning, it seeks to give the discredited WHO huge powers over this country and our people. Powers to call pandemics, enforce lockdowns, enforce vaccinations and decide when any pandemic is over. We know from the pandemic and we know from other outbreaks such as Ebola that these diseases know no borders.

CHAPTER 49 / 49 Discussion

WHO Treaty Language and Constitutional Remedies

Bob Barnes analyzes the specific language of the WHO treaty, noting it aims to control supply chains and "equity distribution." He warns that the treaty would empower the WHO to enforce lockdowns and vaccinations, violating the First, Second, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments. He calls for a return to constitutional liberty as the only remedy.

world health organization· supply chains· first amendment· second amendment· lockdowns

2:52:04 And it is only through international cooperation and collaboration together that we will arrive at the solutions to ensure we do not have a repeat of the last few years. How long before those who know someone who has died suddenly or those injured by the vaccines strike back once the war on humanity is completely 100% out in the open? John Bowne reporting. The World Health Organization treaty is as dangerous as people talk about because it's not just about having a planned international coordinated pandemic response like some of its promoters pretend. You read the actual language, they talk about things like

2:52:45 equity distribution between different communities within a country and society. They're talking about controlling supply chains. How do you control supply chains? You control supply chains by controlling every level of the process, including the original manufacturing or production of that, including food, including medicine, including other products. We already know what they mean by a international planned public health response because we've witnessed it during the pandemic response of 2020. What does that mean? It means the ability to take away your right to assemble, the right to speech, the right to religion, the right to expression, the right to petition your government.

2:53:24 all of which are protected under the First Amendment. Your right of self-defense in the Second Amendment on the grounds for various security and safety reasons, taking away your means of self-defense, including your rights to bear arms. Your Fourth Amendment rights against searches and seizures that violate core liberties. Your Fifth Amendment rights to due process of law before any property or liberty can be taken away from you. Your Fifth Amendment right against takings without just compensation. Didn't we just witness small businesses all across America, some of which were more than a hundred years old, removed overnight and not compensated a penny, nickel, dime or dollar? And we've seen violations of the Sixth Amendment, the Seventh Amendment, all of it.

2:54:04 So what's the answer to this rogue World Health Organization, this rogue World Health Organization treaty? It's a return to our constitutional liberty. It's advocates in the court of public opinion in the courts of law to assert those constitutional rights. And if we stand on the Constitution, then we can keep the light of liberty alive against these World Health Organization globalists. Thanks for being with us and see you next time. A lot of incredibly negative, dangerous things are happening. I don't have to list all those off to you.