2:01:52 So this is a well known strategy well known technique that we see the pattern in the past in these admitted and declassified operations. So again neoconservatism they love the soft power approach the soft approach of. Things like humanitarian cover. Things like National Endowment for Democracy. Things like Carnegie Endowment. All of which, for example, have been in Russia in the past, promoting things like color revolution. We forget it. We can't forget the long black ops and espionage events that have occurred going back to Litvinenko, the supposed poisoning by agents of Putin. But very few recall that there was a French intelligence operative that came out and disclosed he was a whistleblower of sorts.
2:02:35 And did a video talking about how Western intelligence has a whole hit team that goes around and does poisonings. And that can then be blamed on people like Putin. I suspect that's the case, I don't know. In a lot of these cases, we'll never know. However, I do know that if I recall, it's George Soros that published Litvinenko's memoir. So that could tell us a little bit of who might be behind the support of this idea of Litvinenko's poisoning. This also mirrors the Skripal affair and the Novichok, all this sort of what I think was a made up idea. There is no evidence that there was Novichok. This was a staged thing that all again, prepares us for we're seeing now in the confrontation with Russia. This was again, this was prior to the Trump era, right? And then Trump is pictured as a Russian agent. That was all nonsense, but it also plays into the narrative of this new Cold War of this revitalized great game. And again, what is this ultimately about? Controlling the Eurasian heartland, the energy corridors that are there. That's why the North Stream pipeline I think was sabotaged by Western intelligence, like that's pretty obvious.
2:03:40 doesn't really matter. We know who has the motive here, but who specifically was the team, we don't know that. But then again, this is the strategy of tension, the arc of crisis that I mentioned, which is, for example, Brzezinski's model of how in all the former Eastern Bloc countries, you stage terror, you stage collapse, you stage coup, not just with the soft power model of things like NED, color revolutions, that kind of stuff being promoted. Call of Revolution is the Jean Sharp model is the soft approach at the same time as you do the terror, the black ops stuff. That's why Brzezinski and you can look at Operation Underworld, right? Operation Underworld is the union with Western intelligence and organized crime networks to be involved in the funding not just of the black ops, but also of these kind of assassinations and hit teams.
2:04:28 So there's a long history of working with hit teams, organized crime, assassins, black ops. We saw, for example, the Maidan coup of 2014. Western intelligence, I believe, was behind the sniper event that occurred. That really helped to kick off the 2014 coup event. And that was all prepped for many, many years by all the money flowing in via Soros, via Color Revolutions, via Orange Revolution by a Newlands admission to help foster the event in 2014 in Ukraine. That was a long term plan, long term strategy. Why? Because it all goes back to the great game. It all goes back to the Western Anglo American establishment and now also Israel model of controlling this key area where a huge portion of the world's resources and population exists, the Eurasian heartland.
2:05:22 It also is relevant to mention that although Russia is not necessarily a quote Christian nation per se, it's still returning. I mean, it's recovering from all of these years of Sovietism and communism. It's beginning to heal from that. It must be kept at bay. It must be kept down as Brzezinski admits in his books, as Kissinger admits as well. Brzezinski says in the Grand Chess Board this has to be done. So the strategy of tension, these crisis models are again, appropriated and used, expropriated and used, I should say. both the soft power model and the black ops, false flag type of events. Again, I don't know for sure that this was a false flag event, but the standard pattern of history here lines up with everything that we've seen
2:06:04 in the past in terms of Gladio. Gladio is not what this is, it's not identical to Gladio. Gladio is a window into understanding how Western intelligence, the CIA, etc., have utilized these types of events and have planned and strategized these types of events in the past. So it becomes a kind of skeleton key as well to unlock and understand how this happens. And in fact, the same Green Berets in Gladio that trained the cells, the stay behind units to engage in sabotage and black ops and false flag shootings and so forth. They're the same Green Berets that went and taught at the School of Americas. So you understand this becomes the same pattern
2:06:43 Islamic terror as well. Also, Mujahideen trained by some of the same people if you read, for example, the Williams book or the Daniel Ganser Gladio thesis book. Again, this is all covered in books like Full Spectrum Dominance by F. William Engdahl. We've seen this over and over and over, and it's all part of a kind of continuing story of 9-11 plays a key role in this. The even going back further to the 93- World Trade Center false flag event. It goes back to the Clinton era of bombing. taking out Serbia and Slobodan Milosevic. I'm not saying that these people are good people. I'm just saying that this is all part of a long strategy, a long plan of the continued Cold War. So that the Western Anglo American Zionist Israel power structure can have the upper hand and have no potential opposition, no potential opponents.