Topic: Hiroshima

Matt Bracken compares the February 28th attack on Iran to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, calling it a "date that will live in infamy." He criticizes the U.S. for launching a sneak attack during active negotiations, resulting in civilian casualties.

The hosts compare the fanaticism of the Iranian regime to the Japanese "Bushido" code and the Nazi defense of Berlin. Savage notes that civilized people struggle to understand fanatics who have no regard for human life and place military targets in schools and mosques. They express concern that the world is watching "the world burn" with little power to intervene.

Comedian Owen Benjamin joins the show to discuss his new book, "How to Slay a Wizard," which explores the use of hypnotic language and "word magic" by globalists. Benjamin argues that Donald Trump has fallen victim to "wizardry," becoming an inversion of himself through narcissistic delusion. He also questions the historical narrative of nuclear fallout, citing his father's keynote speech in Hiroshima as a turning point in his skepticism.

Owen Benjamin describes "duck and cover" drills from his childhood as trauma rituals designed to make the population docile and fatalistic. He suggests that the nuclear bomb narrative is a "spell" used for mind control, noting that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not among the most destroyed cities in Japan compared to firebombed Tokyo. He attributes the Japanese surrender to the Russian invasion of Manchuria rather than the atomic bombs.

Owen Benjamin challenges the conventional narrative regarding nuclear weapons, suggesting that the fear of total world vaporization is a "wizard spell" used for mind control. He notes that his father, a professor of rhetoric, gave a keynote in Hiroshima, which led Benjamin to question why the city is habitable if radiation lasts for thousands of years. The discussion posits that firebombing in Tokyo was more destructive than the atomic strikes and that "duck and cover" drills were trauma rituals designed to create a docile, fearful population.

Viktor Bout explains the military doctrine of the "threat escalation ladder," suggesting that the only remaining move for the administration is a nuclear strike. He notes that the geography of Iran makes conventional destruction of its civilization impossible within 48 hours, leaving nuclear weapons as the only option to fulfill Trump's threats. Bout warns that a strike on Tehran would cause unspeakable war crimes and contaminate the entire Middle East.

Donald Trump has reportedly threatened to "take out the entire country of Iran" in a single night, leading to discussions about the 25th Amendment. The host compares the threat to the atomic bombings of Japan, noting that such an action would make the U.S. "instantly hated worldwide." There is speculation about whether the president is using "insane negotiation tactics" or if he has undergone a mental break, with the host describing himself as "beyond freaked out."

The military resolve of the Iranian Shiite forces is compared to that of the North Vietnamese and Imperial Japanese, with the host arguing they are even more determined. Historical references to the firebombing of Japan and the surrender of Emperor Hirohito are used to illustrate that traditional warfare may not work against Iran. The host warns that a ground invasion would be a "suicide mission" for U.S. forces.

Matt Bracken discusses the concept of "unrestricted warfare," comparing the current situation to the sinking of the Lusitania. He cites MIT professor Ted Postol's analysis of Iranian Shahed drones, noting they are highly sophisticated and capable of "time on target" attacks. Bracken warns that the world is entering a "pan-foe war" involving pandemic, famine, and war that will collapse global supply chains.

The geopolitical landscape is divided into the "Camp of Reason and Peace" and the "Camp of Unconsciousness." General Flynn warns that there is no such thing as a "tactical" nuclear weapon, as even small nukes are significantly more powerful than those used in WWII. He points to the cutting of undersea cables in the Baltic Sea as a potential precursor to more significant false flag operations.

A caller from a ministry background discusses the difficulty of waking up a "dumbed-down" populace to political realities. An anecdote is shared regarding six Jesuits who reportedly survived the Hiroshima nuclear blast at ground zero without developing radiation sickness, attributed to their religious devotion. The segment explores the intersection of spiritual warfare, Catholic mystics like Padre Pio, and the predicted "three days of darkness."

Eddie Bravo expresses total skepticism regarding the existence of nuclear weapons, claiming they are a tool for fear and control. He suggests that the destruction in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was caused by conventional explosives like TNT rather than atomic bombs. Jones challenges this, citing his own family's history in New Mexico and the visible evidence of large-scale detonations.

Dr. Thorpe cites estimates from Dr. Denis Rancourt suggesting 585 million global citizens have been killed or injured by the vaccines. He compares the "injured-to-kill ratio" of the COVID-19 vaccine to atomic weapons and the thalidomide disaster, arguing that the current situation is far more lethal. Thorpe predicts a new pandemic will be used to distract from these revelations.

The conversation explores the "depopulation agenda," referencing the Georgia Guidestones' goal of reducing the human population to 500 million. Dr. James Thorpe compares the "injured-to-kill ratio" of the COVID-19 vaccine (33.4) to that of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (0.9), arguing the vaccine is more destructive. He also notes that the vaccine's damage far exceeds the historical thalidomide disaster.

A clip of Tucker Carlson is played where he questions the morality of using nuclear weapons on civilians. Carlson argues that justifying the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is "prima facie evil." Alex Jones connects this to Anthony Sutton's work on how Wall Street funded Hitler, illustrating the Hegelian Dialectic used to justify the creation of destructive technologies.

Nuclear warfare theory distinguishes between atomic bombs, hydrogen bombs, and neutron bombs, the latter of which creates a lethal radiation burst without destroying infrastructure. Globalist figures like Bertrand Russell reportedly proposed using neutron bombs for earth depopulation because they leave farmland and buildings intact while killing populations via radiation. If the conflict escalates, major Iranian cities and military bases could be targeted with these weapons, leading to instantaneous or agonizing deaths for millions.

McGregor condemns recent comments by a Michigan congressman regarding the use of nuclear weapons in Gaza and Ukraine, comparing the suggestion to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He argues that such statements are irresponsible given Russia's nuclear capabilities and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. He expresses disbelief that any American official would back the "ruthless extermination" of human beings regardless of their ethnicity.

A comment by an Israeli minister regarding the possibility of nuking Gaza is viewed as a tacit confirmation of Israel's nuclear arsenal. Analysts note that the tonnage of conventional explosives already dropped on Gaza is equivalent to nearly two atomic bombs.

Gerald Celente reports on his participation in the Humanity for Peace rally outside the United Nations in New York City. He criticizes the low turnout and lambastes the UN as a "clown show" of bureaucrats. Celente, alongside Scott Ritter, spoke about the dangers of nuclear annihilation and the historical failures of the UN, specifically referencing the Iraq War and "Colin Power's" false claims about WMDs.

Kate Dally introduces a controversial theory questioning the nature of the atomic bombs dropped on Japan, suggesting they may have been conventional firebombings. She cites the 1945 testimony of Major Alexander Seversky, who observed that Hiroshima's concrete buildings and bridges remained largely intact, unlike what would be expected from a nuclear blast. The segment also notes the loss of original negatives from the Trinity test as a point of suspicion regarding the official nuclear narrative.