2:41:51 People used to bring guns to school for Pete's sakes. We had target practice utilizing weaponry at school and you didn't have those kinds of things happen. But I don't blame mental illness in video games. I think these things are more staged and I think it's convenient to blame mental illness in video games for these things. I do. I think it's very convenient because you can blame the culture, but still going up and shooting up anonymous people isn't as plausible as you think it is. And really there should be much more events have been targeted if that's the case. I'll be right back, I have more. More questions, of course, on the Alex Jones Show. Shouldn't we be questioning everything? Welcome back to the Alex Jones Show. I'm Kate Dally, your guest host from katedallyradio.com, The Kate Dally Show. I'm so glad to be here with you because look, you can always ask questions, right? Questions never hurt anybody. And I always want to see things from different vantage points. I like the challenge personally, I really do, because it makes me think. And our narratives are so strong that sometimes we pick and choose which narratives we want to look at.
2:42:53 And sometimes I think maybe that does a disservice to us. Maybe we ought to look at everything, question everything, and then see what sticks, right? And then see what has the plausibility factor big time. There was a huge event right last week about Russia threatening nuclear revenge. And in December we heard he was readying the nukes. I mean, not just looking at nukes, but readying the nukes to come after us. And a lot of people thought within a couple of days everything was gonna be nuked. And I said, no, I said, they love this threat. This threat is, it grabs headlines, there's fear, the boogeyman, woo, you know? And they've been doing this for 80 years, okay, 70 years.
2:43:37 And so what was interesting about it though was I had just read a piece questioning the Trinity. Trinity was the nuclear weapon test, right, for the Manhattan Project before the detonation of the bomb. Well, Japan had already surrendered. There was never really a reason to drop that bomb. So why did they? In fact, they surrendered twice, I do believe. Okay. So there was never a reason for it. So why did they do it? That's an interesting question because there had to have been a much bigger reason to drop a bomb when somebody already surrenders.
2:44:16 And they're using this over and over again. I could go back to 1980 headlines right now that would tell you the exact same thing. Oh, the nukes are readying, we're about to get nuked. Everything was about nuclear warfare and it always has been, right? That's why we made North Korea the enemy. We'd put them on the stage. I can just picture like a clown dancing on stage. You know, when you bring out the next enemy, you say they're gonna nuke us. We could take out North Korea in two seconds. I mean, it was ridiculous, but people believed it, right? So this was kind of interesting. We have this new movie, Oppenheimer, coming out. And whenever I see a movie that is sort of highlighting, if you will, the narratives of our time, and they love to do this, okay? You'll always see the movies backing it up, right? You'll always see a dramatic movie to get the emotion behind it on the Manhattan Project and the atomic bomb.
2:45:10 And so when I see a movie, I'm always a little intrigued to go look at the events from another perspective to see maybe what we were lied about, what they lied to us about, okay? Trinity, and maybe they didn't. I just wanna bring this up because I think it's worthy of a question. Trinity was the code name for the first detonation of the nuclear weapon. And it was conducted by the United States Army as part of the Manhattan Project, July 16th over the summer in 1945 in New Mexico. Secura, New Mexico. And this was on, it's now part of the White Sands Missile Range. And the only structures originally in the vicinity were the McDonald Ranch House and some buildings, which the scientists used as a laboratory for testing bombs. And the base camp was constructed and there were about 425 people present on the weekend of the test. And the code name Trinity was assigned to Oppenheimer. But really, the guy really behind all of this that's never truly mentioned was Vannevar Bush.
2:46:08 He was a guy that was in policy, he had the presidency, or he had a ton of power. Remember Valerie from Iran that had all the power in Obama's regime? Okay, the little whisper, the ear whisper, okay. This was the same kind of thing. Vannevar Bush was this guy at this time and he was the one that orchestrated the whole Manhattan Project and Oppenheimer to do this. But oddly enough, the movie's about Oppenheimer. Oppenheimer, however you want to say it. You know I'm the name murderer, so whatever. Anyway, get over it. So the test was an implosion design plutonium device named the Gadget, and the same design as the Fat Man bomb later detonated over Japan. And then of course, the complexity of the design, this was going to be the first nuclear test ever, okay? It was directed by Kenneth Bainbridge. Also in this same thing, right?
2:47:02 They said the rise of the fascist governments in Europe led to a fear of the German nuclear weapon project, especially among scientists who were refugees of Nazi Germany and other countries and so forth. And so this was the reason they put out in order to get the funding and the okay to do all of this. Okay, so Julian Mack and Berlin Brixner were responsible for photography. The photography and group employed some 50 different cameras taking motion and still photographs, okay? They had special Fastax cameras. Now we all know that many companies, I'll say this lightly, many companies that dealt with cameras and such were CIA ops. But I just wanna throw that out there because we know this now, okay.
2:47:45 So they were taking these photographs, but wouldn't you know that only one photograph actually came into fruition? Only one faraway photograph by one obscure person named Jack Aby actually got a picture of it. And did you know, and it's kind of blurry and it's off, but did you know this? that the only picture that was ever taken that was actually well exposed, they had all these cameras, they knew what they were blowing up, right? But then they couldn't get a good shot of it. But just the one guy had one picture. They wanted his negative. They handed the negative over and the negative doesn't even exist today. It's kind of like the moon with NASA. Not one single document about how we got there or what we were doing ever showed up again and was lost.
2:48:34 because somebody lost the key or I don't know what happened to the storage unit somewhere off somewhere, Washington DC that was stored, who knows, Maryland. Anyway, the only negative of this photo was lost. Man, the only negative of the nuclear test that would set off the nuclear program was lost? Gosh, so weird, strange. Anyway, All right, so here's the question and this was written by Russ Winter just lately and I love this so hat tip to him. Was Hiroshima firebombed and not nuked at the time? This is a really, really good question because I want to read to you the testimony of US Major Alexander Saversky who died in 1945 coincidentally.
2:49:22 died right after this, right after he said this, inspected the bombed towns of Japan. And this is what he said. In Hiroshima, I was prepared for radically different sights, but to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned out cities in Japan. There was a familiar pink blot about two miles in diameter. It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. And one of the only city's 20 bridges was down. Only one of the bridges was... only one of the city's bridges was down. It's weird. Usually it just decimates everything, doesn't it? So we were told anyway. Hiroshima's clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright, he said. It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we'd been led to believe. It was an extensive blast rather than intensive. Think about that. It was an extensive blast rather than an intensive blast. I had heard buildings constantly consumed by unprecedented heat, yet there I saw buildings structurally intact.
2:50:20 And what is more topped by undamaged flagpoles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs, and fragile objects that were just standing there. Hmm, they weren't decimated? At the T-bridge, he said, the aiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the bald spot where everyone presumably had been vaporizing the twinkling of an eye, but it wasn't there or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena. Strange. What did I see in substance, a replica or the Tokyo suburbs, Yokohama or Osaka, the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses raised by uncontrollable fire, he said.
2:50:59 Everywhere I saw the chunks of charred and leafless trees burned and unburned chunks of wood, the fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel grinders yet to melt glass until it ran like lava just as in other Japanese cities he had seen, where they were firebombed. The concrete buildings nearest to the center of explosion, only a few blocks from the heart of the atom blast, showed no structural damage. Even cornices, canopies, delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered. But of course, the single panel frames held firm, only window frames and two or more panels were bent and buckled. And the blast impact therefore could not have been unusual. And this event was not unusual. But he expected to see it, just didn't see it. And oddly enough, the victims were flown over here right away for care in our army hospitals. Strange, right? I thought that US Major Alexander, I should say D. Seversky,
2:51:55 I thought his words were interesting, don't you? Somebody that was there that saw it, that had these thoughts. Very, very strange. Something to look at, something to keep in mind. Think about narratives. Hmm. I'll be right back on the Alex Jones Show. I'm Kate Daly, your guest host. Back here with you on the Alex Jones Show. I'm Kate Daly from katedalyradio.com. Good to be with you. As we sum this up, I want to bring up just some points I've been thinking about. Okay? We know that these people are full of narratives, okay? And I'm sure that we have weapons of destruction. There's no doubt in my mind. What do you think they've been working on and have black budgets for? Many black budgets we know nothing about, that's why they're called black. And obviously, we know DARPA, all the agencies have been really hard at work at developing things.
