Topic: Court Of Appeals

The Third Court of Appeals in Texas has reportedly stayed an attempt by The Onion and Michael Bloomberg to take control of Infowars. Jones describes the acquisition attempt as a fraudulent hijacking and a "hoax" that was previously overturned by a federal bankruptcy judge in Houston. Despite the legal victory, Jones prepares to move his production to a new studio under different ownership to ensure continuity of the broadcast.

Zachary Rehl details the procedural hurdles he faced while filing a Rule 33 motion for new evidence. He accuses the DOJ of attempting to stonewall the litigation of Jeremy Bertino's recantation by forcing the appeal to proceed without the new evidence. Rehl explains how he successfully petitioned the appeals court for an abeyance, which eventually led to the government's motion to dismiss the case.

Harrison Smith reads a message from Stuart Rhodes clarifying the three-step process for the DOJ to vacate convictions and remand cases for dismissal with prejudice. Rhodes views this as the DOJ "throwing in the towel" to avoid losing in the Court of Appeals. Zachary Rehl agrees, noting that while the process isn't finished, it is a massive victory for the 12 defendants involved, including Enrique Tarrio.

Alex Jones engages in a personal feud with Mark Levin, responding to Levin's calls for anti-war reporters to be fired. Jones defends his physical fitness and character against Levin's insults, while criticizing Levin for supporting the $1.5 billion legal judgment against InfoWars. Levin is characterized as an "Israeli intelligence asset" and the primary architect of pro-war propaganda for Sean Hannity.

InfoWars is facing a potential shutdown as a Texas receiver, appointed by Judge Glory Gamble, has reportedly signaled he will stop paying the company's rent and utility bills. Despite having funds available, the legal "no man's land" following the Supreme Court's refusal to hear the Connecticut ruling has put the network's future in jeopardy. Plans are in place to transition to a new studio and network if the current facility is shuttered.

The speaker discusses the legal battle over InfoWars, claiming that the "The Onion" and Bloomberg attempted to buy the company for nothing in a fraudulent auction. The Texas Court of Appeals is expected to overturn prior rulings due to civil rights violations. A scandal involving a federal bankruptcy judge and his girlfriend's law firm is cited as evidence of corruption in the proceedings.

Judge Maya Guerra Gamble has reportedly signed a new order authorizing a receiver to seize InfoWars assets within five days, allegedly disregarding a stay from the Texas Third Court of Appeals. The legal situation is described as "crazy town," with claims that the judge is attempting to override higher court authority. Listeners are encouraged to support the network through the Alex Jones Store, which is stated to be a separate legal entity.

The Texas Court of Appeals has lifted a stay, greenlighting a receiver to take control of the InfoWars building and assets. A letter delivered to the accounting firm gives the organization five days to provide an exit strategy or face eviction by the Sheriff's Department. The ruling was issued by Judge Greg Gamble, whom the host characterizes as a "Soros Antifa" operative.

The host recounts receiving news from his accountant that the Texas Court of Appeals lifted the stay on the receiver, meaning the studio could be seized in as little as five business days. Despite this, the Alex Jones Network app has launched on Android and is surging in popularity. The broadcast is prepared to switch to backup studios and satellite uplinks to ensure continuity regardless of the physical studio's status.

Judge Guerra Gamble has ordered the liquidation of InfoWars and its parent company, Free Speech Systems, to pay damages to Sandy Hook families. Defense attorney Ben Brooks states that the court was misled and plans to seek emergency relief from the Austin Court of Appeals. Jones urges listeners to support the operation through product purchases to fund the ongoing legal battle.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Trump administration's right to deport illegal alien terrorists, calling Judge Boasberg's previous sanctions a "clear abuse of discretion." Critics argue that these administrative judges are engaged in a criminal conspiracy directed by the Democratic Party. Despite media spin from outlets like Axios, the ruling is framed as a major victory for executive branch authority.

Robert Barnes returns to discuss how the host's case is being used to set a dangerous precedent for suppressing free speech globally. The Texas Court of Appeals is currently reviewing the case, with Barnes predicting that the state Supreme Court will eventually overturn the "show trial" verdicts. He argues that the legal system has been weaponized to bypass constitutional protections.

Elon Musk and X Corporation recently won a Court of Appeals case in DC regarding the FBI’s use of secret gag orders to seize user data. The ruling allows companies to notify users in real-time if the government requests their social media information. This victory is seen as a critical check on the FBI's ability to conduct "ghost" surveillance on whistleblowers and journalists.

A previous court-appointed receiver reportedly committed suicide three days after a specific prayer was offered for his heart to change. The Texas Court of Appeals is said to be signaling a win for the broadcaster, despite "demonic" behavior from opposing lawyers who taunted the court. The segment details the legal "show trial" where a judge found the defendant liable for "elder abuse" two weeks after a jury verdict.

The discussion explores the practice of "forum shopping," where lawyers seek out favorable jurisdictions for their cases. Tom Renz and the host discuss the difference between ethical filing and the use of "rigged" courts where activist judges allegedly manipulate evidentiary records to prevent successful appeals. They argue that some district courts create "trash" factual records that are nearly impossible to overturn in the appellate process.

Incoming Border Czar Tom Homan is reportedly contacting local officials to coordinate mass deportations and a crackdown on human trafficking and sex slavery. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled in favor of federal deportation authority over local sanctuary city objections. Homan is expected to meet with New York City Mayor Eric Adams to address the migrant crisis.

Viva Frei provides a legal update on Donald Trump's cases in New York, including the civil fraud judgment and the "hush money" conviction. Frei predicts that the verdicts will eventually be vacated or tossed on appeal, noting that even New York appellate judges appeared skeptical of the $454 million disgorgement penalty for a victimless crime. They argue these cases have severely damaged public trust in the judiciary.

Legal experts predict the New York Court of Appeals may overturn recent judgments against Donald Trump to prevent a massive flight of foreign investment from the state. Robert Barnes argues that Trump is on track for a landslide victory larger than 2016, potentially carrying states like Minnesota and New Hampshire. The segment also addresses the legal troubles facing Special Counsel Jack Smith regarding the constitutionality of his appointment.

Ken Paxton outlines his strategy to recruit and campaign for MAGA candidates in the upcoming March primaries to retake the Texas House. He emphasizes the importance of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, which recently stripped the Attorney General's office of the power to prosecute voter fraud. Paxton urges the "War Room" audience to get involved in local races to ensure Texas remains a conservative stronghold.

Senator John Kennedy grills nominee Lauren AliKhan on her personal beliefs regarding systemic racism and whether minorities need special help to succeed. AliKhan repeatedly declines to offer a personal opinion, citing her role as a sitting judge. Kennedy expresses disappointment in her refusal to answer straightforward questions about her worldview and the nature of the court system.