Topic: Cisa

Former CIA officer Gary Bernsen provides detailed testimony regarding the origins of Smartmatic, claiming it was created by the Hugo Chavez regime to alter election results. Bernsen alleges that the source code for both Smartmatic and Dominion is owned by the Venezuelan "Cartel del Sol" and that hardware is manufactured in China. He criticizes CISA for consulting with these companies to dismiss public concerns about election integrity during the 2020 cycle.

A whistleblower from CISA has reportedly revealed that the federal government was aware of critical vulnerabilities in voting machines during the 2020 election but chose to remain silent. The Georgia State Election Board is now seeking DOJ assistance to obtain 2020 records from Fulton County. Meanwhile, Donald Trump is cutting federal funding to blue states that refuse to implement voter ID laws or stop DEI-based "brainwashing" in schools.

Mike Benz explains how the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was used to federalize election control and internet censorship. By classifying "misinformation" as a cyber threat to "critical infrastructure," the DHS gained the authority to coordinate with social media companies to ban accounts. This operation reportedly began on January 6, 2017, as an outgoing act of the Obama administration.

Mike Benz explains the origins of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and its role in domestic internet censorship. On January 6, 2017, outgoing DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson designated elections as "critical infrastructure," which Benz argues allowed the government to treat "misinformation" as a cyberattack. This legal maneuver reportedly enabled the DHS to bypass jurisdictional limits and coordinate with social media companies to ban accounts. The operation is described as a way to combine the foreign intelligence powers of the CIA with the domestic reach of the FBI.

CIA Director Bill Burns and Secretary of State Tony Blinken are accused of having deep financial ties to China through the Carnegie Endowment and the Penn Biden Center. DHS CISA, under Chris Krebs, allegedly used a "Countering Foreign Influence Task Force" to censor Donald Trump's tweets about foreign ballot printing. This operation is described as a treasonous effort to hide the CCP's role in the 2020 election.

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) allegedly operated a massive censorship network to suppress claims of foreign election interference. Internal slide decks reveal that a June 22nd tweet by Donald Trump regarding foreign-printed ballots was used as a primary justification for launching the censorship operation. Documents suggest that DHS officials possessed classified knowledge that Trump's claims were accurate but chose to flag and remove the content to protect the administration.

The Trump administration is dismantling the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which critics labeled a "Ministry of Truth" for its role in domestic censorship. The head of the agency was previously removed following public embarrassment over musical performances regarding speech restrictions. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is now targeting these offices to eliminate what is described as a partisan censorship apparatus.

President Trump has placed several officials from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on administrative leave. These workers were involved in "combating disinformation," which critics argue was a cover for government-led censorship, including the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story. The administration aims to remove federal employees who coordinated with corporate media to promote partisan narratives under the guise of cybersecurity.

Attorney Brian Blem joins the discussion to analyze the legal remedies available for government surveillance abuses. He describes a split in the Republican Party between the MAGA wing and the "National Security Wing" that aligns with Democrats. The conversation also covers the case of journalist Catherine Herridge and the role of agencies like CISA in coordinating censorship across corporate media outlets.

Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, joins the show to analyze DHS and CISA documents regarding the acquisition of AI. Adams argues that the government plans to label free speech as a "cybersecurity threat" to justify using AI to silence dissent. He highlights a memorandum from Alejandro Mayorkas that discusses protecting AI algorithms from "malicious degradation," which Adams interprets as a mandate to censor alternative media.

The conversation shifts to the battle between corporate AI (Google, IBM, Microsoft) and the open-source community. Mike Adams warns that the CISA "Roadmap for Artificial Intelligence" aims to infiltrate every level of local government to centralize control. He reminds listeners of CISA's alleged role in the 2020 election and warns that the same infrastructure is being repurposed to monitor and regulate AI deployment nationwide.

A Department of Homeland Security memorandum issued by Alejandro Mayorkas outlines policies for protecting AI from "malicious degradation of algorithmic functions." This language suggests that publishing information contradicting official narratives on vaccines or war could be classified as a cybersecurity threat. The government is positioning itself to label the use of AI transcription or summarization tools by independent media as "AI-enhanced attacks."

The 2023-2024 CISA Roadmap for Artificial Intelligence outlines a plan to infiltrate every level of government, from tribal to state, with federally guided AI deployment. This centralized control is expected to influence elections, court proceedings, and local budgetary activities. Critics point to CISA's previous involvement in 2020 election censorship as evidence that these new AI tools will be used to silence political opposition.

The federal government is expected to designate independent AI knowledge bases, such as an InfoWars chatbot, as "threats to national security." This will likely lead to foundational Supreme Court cases regarding the First Amendment and the right to distribute AI-driven information. While Elon Musk may lead this legal battle, the conflict represents a broader struggle over whether the government can regulate the "thoughts" and outputs of non-woke AI.

The Missouri v. Biden litigation has exposed the extent of federal government pressure on social media companies to censor discourse, including claims of election fraud. Critics argue that agencies like CISA and the FBI should not be allowed to control the "four corners of discourse." Legislative efforts in the House are being discussed to prevent future government-led censorship regimes.

Investigative journalist Elijah Schaefer joins the program to discuss bombshell whistleblower reports regarding government-funded censorship. The reports suggest that the Obama administration established boards of governance to manage "misinformation" through university cutouts. Schaefer argues that these apparatuses were perfected during the pandemic and are now being used to target political dissidents and independent media.

Representative Jim Jordan released a bombshell report detailing how the DHS, CISA, and the CIA partnered with universities to censor millions of social media posts before the 2020 election. The report alleges that truthful news, jokes, and information regarding the Hunter Biden laptop were suppressed to manipulate public opinion.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals extended an injunction against the Biden administration, specifically targeting the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey argues that CISA serves as the "nerve center" for a vast censorship enterprise that coordinated with Big Tech to silence the Hunter Biden laptop story. The court found that these federal agencies likely violated the First Amendment by coercing social media companies to remove election-related speech.

Ferry County, Washington, recently voted to disconnect "Albert sensors" from their election machines, a move criticized by NPR as being based on "Republican mistrust." Guest host Kate Dalley argues that these sensors, provided by CISA and the Department of Homeland Security, are actually tools for centralized election manipulation. The segment claims that over 900 such sensors have been deployed nationwide to monitor and potentially alter election data in real-time.

The House Judiciary Committee has recommended criminal charges against a cybersecurity censorship system allegedly established during the Obama administration. Alex Jones claims this system, involving the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), colluded with Big Tech to silence Americans. The report suggests that government agencies knowingly bypassed legal restrictions to regulate online speech and information.