Wednesday, 8 May 2024

Must-Watch Wednesday Broadcast: Alex Jones & Nick Fuentes Discuss the Future of Free Speech In America & Worldwide - FULL SHOW - 05/08/2024

A legislative crackdown on religious speech and a major victory in the Florida documents case signal a turning point for the American legal and political landscape.

By The Alex Jones Show | 3h 23m listen | 49 chapters
Must-Watch Wednesday Broadcast: Alex Jones & Nick Fuentes Discuss the Future of Free Speech In America & Worldwide - FULL SHOW - 05/08/2024 cover

About this episode

The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, a move critics warn effectively criminalizes New Testament passages and empowers the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance to dictate American speech policy. This legislative shift coincides with Judge Aileen Cannon indefinitely suspending Donald Trump's classified documents trial in Florida following evidence tampering allegations against Special Counsel Jack Smith.

Secondary developments include a fatal cardiac arrest during a Pfizer gene therapy trial and the EPA's new limits on PFAS forever chemicals in tap water. In Georgia, District Attorney Fani Willis faces disqualification threats in the election interference case, while New York Senator Kevin Parker challenges the Adult Survivors Act's constitutionality after being sued for an alleged 2004 rape. Meanwhile, Dr. Andrew Wakefield and Emmy Robbin launched the film Protocol 7 to expose Merck's alleged vaccine fraud, as VAERS data reveals over 37,000 deaths linked to recent mRNA injections. Nick Fuentes also returned to X, crediting Elon Musk for breaking a multi-year censorship regime.

Dr. Andrew Wakefield shared a personal story of his ex-wife's sixth sense saving their daughter from drowning to illustrate the power of maternal intuition. Nick Fuentes reflected on his Kafka-esque experience on a federal no-fly list, while Alex Jones warned that the Lavender AI targeting system in Gaza represents a terrifying shift toward autonomous warfare.


CHAPTER 01 / 49 Discussion

International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance Definition, Anti-Semitism Awareness Act

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill requiring the Department of Education to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of anti-semitism for Title VI enforcement. Critics argue the legislation empowers a foreign NGO to control American speech policy and could lead to federal investigations against students and public institutions. The bill incorporates a specific list of contemporary examples of anti-semitism into federal law.

international holocaust remembrance alliance· anti-semitism awareness act· department of education· title vi· civil rights act

00:00 The International Criminal Court in The Hague is contemplating issuing arrest warrants against senior Israeli government and military officials as war criminals. Israel expects the leaders of the free world to stand firmly against the ICC's outrageous assault on Israel's inherent right of self-defense. We expect them to use all the means at their disposal to stop this dangerous move. anti-Semitism in all of its forms without equivocation and without delay. This is our moment. The U.S. House passed a bill 32291, and a group of representatives say they want to protect their Jewish constituents. And the bill would essentially make it easier for the Department of Education to enforce anti-discrimination laws at public institutions. So this bill would require the Department of Education to use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of anti-Semitism.

01:13 Many of the Republicans and Democrats said adding this type of regulation infringes on free speech. Criminal behavior is criminal behavior. Violating people's civil rights is violating people's civil rights. But when we want to insert the government into what you're thinking and what motivates you, you are empowering that which should never be empowered. the ability of the government to police thought. If implemented, the White House says they will, of the Department of Education. It puts a foreign, multinational NGO of the UN out of Israel and Europe in control of the policy and says not only their current definitions, but when they change it, that will be law. So it's saying it's like a blank check veto to control legislation. It's like a new Congress over speech.

02:03 and overall the educational systems of primary school and secondary. It's staggering. So I've read the bill twice. So they get into the act and why they're doing it, the definition of it in federal law, and then how they apply federal law is according to this new definition of anti-Semitism in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. They go on here to give power to this group, a foreign group, to then define and direct federal agencies and the Department of Education, FBI against anyone that does what they say is anti-Semitic. And they give a big laundry list of the current definition. And they say they can also change it whenever they want. So it's an open check legislation just like the CIA got in 47 to do whatever they want. Said that this is one of the worst pieces of legislation we've ever seen.

CHAPTER 02 / 49 Discussion

New Testament Passages, Anti-Semitism Legislation Concerns

Concerns have emerged that the IHRA definition of anti-semitism could criminalize the belief or repetition of New Testament passages regarding the death of Jesus. The legislation is viewed by some as an authoritarian attempt to police Christian doctrine and silence campus criticism of Israeli government policies. Opponents claim the bill equates political criticism of a foreign state with racial or religious hatred.

new testament· gospel· christ's passion· free speech· religious freedom

02:54 I wasn't exaggerating. Now, there's another example on the list that's gotten some attention, that it's anti-Semitic to claim that Jews killed Jesus. That's what the IHRA says. But that is not a claim invented by anti-Semites. That's in the gospel. According to every gospel account of Christ's passion, the Romans carried out the execution of Jesus at the insistence and behest of the Jewish authorities that handed him over to be killed. and the mob that called for his death. It may be true that some actual anti-Semites, as in those who hate Jews, have used these biblical passages as a justification for their hatred. That does not make the passages themselves false or evil or anti-Semitic, and it certainly doesn't give Congress the right to tell Christians that they cannot believe or repeat what is in those passages. So get this Joe, as in the United States of America,

03:48 If you criticize Israel, the state police come to arrest you and your family. It goes on to explain the national security strategies of the president, the last two, which is anyone conservative or doesn't hate white people is anti-Semitic or a white supremacist who can be put in prison, basically. Criticizing policies of government is equated with anti-Semitism. And that, I think, is a far right, comes from the far right, It comes from the authoritarian leanings where they don't want students on these campuses to voice their opinions because they want to change the narrative going forward.

CHAPTER 03 / 49 Discussion

AI Surveillance, Globalist Social Engineering

The integration of artificial intelligence into federal agencies is facilitating real-time tracking of citizens, while automotive technologies like kill switches and geo-fencing increase state control. Social engineers are accused of unraveling traditional gender roles and promoting a culture of apathy to distract from globalist agendas. The broadcast emphasizes the importance of being informed and involved as society faces increasing technological and political pressure.

artificial intelligence· kill switches· geo-fencing· social engineering· infowars

04:32 on all of us in live time by A.I. and all the federal agencies are in everything with A.I. just tracking everything in live time and your car's got kill switches in it and geo-fencing controls and they just killed 22 million people with poison shots. But we're gonna sit here with the media focused on Israel and Palestine all day to have a big uproar and a big uprising, that a cop's gonna shoot a black man and then everything's gonna burn down when Trump gets elected. I mean, you just, you know, we just sit here and we watch. InfoWars. Tomorrow's news, today. Another government training center dupe. They've taught you how to be cool. The cool person goes, ah, and never thinks. And the guy that gets all the girls is the fool. You know, who wears the cool clothes. He doesn't care about politics, none of that. Oh, baby, let's party. Yeah. I don't care about my future or my kid's future or the world's future. I'm a caring person. I like Bill Clinton a lot. He's so cool.

05:40 You're so nice, dude. Do people realize what you're watching on this program right now? This is incredible. The year is 1995, and InfoWars launches the last of America's counter-globalist probes. In a freak mishap, InfoWars.com and Alex Jones are blown out of their trajectory into an orbit which freezes his life support systems and returns Alex Jones to Earth 25 years later. Transdimensionally,

06:21 over the space-time continuum through full space. Where people are extremely lazy, the social engineers are there laughing. What we envisioned 100 years ago, 20 years ago, is now reality. While the society unravels, men run around totally frantic, not knowing how to be men, and women run around frantic, not knowing how to be women. And they don't understand that it's an animating contest of life, and that it's fulfilling to be informed. It's fulfilling to be involved. It's fulfilling. InfoWars. Tomorrow's news today. It's Wednesday, May 8th, 2024. 180 days out from the most important election in world history.

CHAPTER 04 / 49 Discussion

Judge Aileen Cannon, Trump Classified Documents Trial Delay

Judge Aileen Cannon indefinitely suspended the federal trial regarding Donald Trump's handling of classified documents in Florida. The delay follows allegations that Special Counsel Jack Smith's team tampered with evidence and misled the court about the order of seized files. This ruling makes it unlikely the case will proceed before the November 2024 presidential election.

aileen cannon· jack smith· mar-a-lago· classified documents· donald trump

07:02 I'm your host Alex Jones coming to you from deep in the heart of Texas, Austin broadcasting worldwide. We've got one hell of a transmission up for you. Nick Fuentes is going to be joining us for the third and fourth hour that I'll be hosting today to talk about the future of free speech, not just in America, but worldwide. Dr. Andrew Wakefield, one of the original doctors really exposing poison vaccines and the rest of the new world order, big pharma tyranny. Will be joining us in studio. He's got a new film out. He's also bringing other special guests with him as well. But in about six, seven minutes, Roger Stone is going to be joining us because there's so much Trump news. The whole thing has been derailed. We had him on yesterday talking about all of their criminal and civil cases falling on their faces, making Trump's poll numbers explode.

07:54 The witch hunt is so obvious. Well now the judge in the classified documents case that's on its face of fraud has indefinitely suspended the trial catching the prosecution and the former UN war crimes minion Jack Smith lying to the court about the evidence they had something Trump said a year ago when the raids first happened he said they're tampering with the evidence they are framing me because the president is allowed to have those documents plus they were in a secure area but he saw documents and the way they presented them that was not in the documents. Well now that's been confirmed more evidence tampering that has derailed plus the state senator a few years ago that got the law retroactively changed where you can go back 25 years with no evidence or no claims or no witnesses that someone sexually assaulted you or raped you all for E. Jean Carroll

08:54 Well now he is under attack with that law with a woman saying he raped her and he's saying the law is unconstitutional. Talk about digging a pit for somebody and then you fall into it. This is happening on every front to the rabid Soros controlled DA's and others. So Roger joins us in a few minutes to talk about that. Meanwhile, New York Mayor Eric Adams says Rikers Island would be ready if Trump is sentenced and he's ready to put him in jail for contempt of court for exercising his First Amendment.

CHAPTER 05 / 49 Discussion

Pfizer Gene Therapy Trial, Cardiac Arrest Fatality

A young boy died of cardiac arrest during a Pfizer gene therapy trial, leading to a decline in the company's stock price. Critics point to this event as evidence of the inherent risks in mRNA and gene therapy technologies that were bypassed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Meanwhile, UN and World Economic Forum officials are accused of attributing record excess deaths to "long COVID" rather than vaccine side effects.

pfizer· gene therapy· cardiac arrest· mrna· world economic forum

09:30 that's going to be a big deal. We got a lot of other news as well. We're going to be hitting Pfizer stock hit after it already exploded when they said that our new business is going to be cancer. It's the new COVID. Well stock hit after boy dies of cardiac arrest during gene therapy trial, which is what they've known for 25 years in these M. R N A trials. Another gene therapy trials is it'll either give you a heart attack or liquefy your liver or sometimes You're just eating alive. That's in the literature. That's why they've never been able to use it. So they just roll it out in the public saying safe and effective. Oh, don't worry about human trials because they knew what it had done in lab rats. They were testing these gene therapies one person at a time. And if you look at the history of it, it kills a large portion of those. In some cases, it creates miracle effects. So it's definitely a real technology, but it is, talk about rolling the dice.

10:30 Simply amazing. And there's a whole stack of news on that front. We'll talk about with Dr. Andrew Wakefield coming up. Also, the new talking points are, oh, we never made you wear a mask. We never blocked ivermectin. We never tried to make you take any shots, whether you're in Australia, the US, Germany, the UK, Canada. It's the same propaganda. They're now trying to rewrite history. And at the World Economic Forum, they've got some of the top UN officials saying, listen, there is record deaths. the vaccine. But it's all being caused by long COVID funny. It wasn't happening in the first year without the so called vaccine. But as soon as the shots introduced the mass carnage begins, so we've got.

CHAPTER 06 / 49 Discussion

EPA Water Regulations, PFAS Forever Chemicals

The EPA announced new limits on six types of synthetic "forever chemicals" known as PFAS in the U.S. drinking water supply. These chemicals are linked to serious health effects, including increased cancer risks, and affect tap water for hundreds of millions of Americans. The discussion links these environmental toxins to broader claims about the intentional poisoning of the public through water additives like hydrofluorosilicic acid.

epa· pfas· forever chemicals· fluoride· water supply

11:09 All of that lined up for you as well. There is just so much, so much to get to. Oh, and remember me years ago? I did like a three-hour show on Forever Chemicals, thousands of chemicals in the water. Most of them in what they call fluoride is just toxic waste with hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of chemicals per company. It varies per company. Most of it comes out of China. They call it fluoride. It's not calcium fluoride that's actually good for you in small amounts, poisonous in moderate amounts or even large amounts or even moderate and of course large amounts. It's hydrofluorosilic acid, super poisonous at any level, that supercharges other toxins as like an adjuvant or an accelerant in the body like nitrous oxide in a gasoline engine. Well now ABC News and the White House, they're all, oh my god, almost the whole water supply is deadly poison and we don't know where it's coming from.

12:01 The FDA is so concerned, the EPA is so confirmed. They're the ones since 1947 putting it in 70 plus percent of the US water supply and about half of the European water supply. And it's just simply amazing that I would have these scientists on and doctors and chemical experts and chemists. And then I'd say something, hey, they're putting chemicals in the water that turn the frigging frogs gay. and they take that little clip out and say oh look he's crazy well here's ABC News the EPA is limiting the amount of so called forever chemicals over the first time on a drinking water. The new rule targets synthetic chemicals known as P F A s, which are linked to serious health effects, including the increase of cancer. What's Florida? I do. Chemicals can be found in the tap water supplying hundreds of millions of Americans. The EPA now is requiring water companies to lower six types of P F A s to near zero levels.

13:02 making them go into huge debt buying these super expensive cleaning systems. So they dump the fluoride mixture in, it creates a toxic, they go, we don't know where it's coming from, and then has to go through all these giant filtration systems to clean out the poison they're putting in. Kind of like give somebody an mRNA shot that turbo charges cancer and cardiovascular problems and infertility and everything else, and then say, oh my God, cancer's exploding, we don't know why, but our new business model is cancer satisfies her. their stock shoots up. They do an mRNA test on a little boy and it gives him a heart attack in two days. That's Associated Press. Pfizer stock hit after boy dies of cardiac arrest during gene therapy trial. Well, 70% of America roughly took at least one of the shots. 40% took two. Something like 35% took three or more. There you go. I mean, this is absolutely wild.

CHAPTER 07 / 49 Discussion

Fani Willis, Georgia Election Interference Case Status

The Georgia election interference case against Donald Trump faces significant hurdles following revelations regarding District Attorney Fani Willis's personal relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade. Allegations of witness intimidation and evidence manipulation have led to calls for disqualification. The segment contrasts the legal treatment of Trump with that of Joe Biden regarding the possession of classified materials.

fani willis· nathan wade· fulton county· election interference· donald trump

14:06 And it's all out in the open. All right, we're 180 days out from the election. The quickening is here. Every one of these projects against Trump, the Sybil lawsuits, the criminal indictments are blowing up in their face, are derailing in front of the world. Look at what happened with E. Jean Carroll. Sure, they got their fake conviction, Sybilly, but it blew up in their face politically. Nobody bought it. Trump went up in numbers. Look at Georgia. That's completely collapsed with Fannie Willis and her boyfriend and lying about it. manipulating evidence and threatening witnesses and all the rest of it. And then look at the documents case, cut and dry. Trump can have any document he wants. He can declassify any document he wants as president. Biden as vice president can't have any documents, but he gets away with it. The FBI says he's too feeble to prosecute him, literally in their own FBI report. And then now we have the case in the documents situation in Miami, Florida, just down the road from where Roger and Trump are at there at Mar-a-Lago.

15:02 and Palm Beach and they lied to the judge and said we've not altered or tampered or manipulated or moved any documents and the order we've given them to you is accurate and the scans we're giving you are accurate. Now they say actually we manipulated them all and move things around and change things and put notes in and added things and that's what Trump said when this first happened. You can go to his true social, remember he said Evidence tampering, fraud, I'm being framed because some of the things he saw he'd never seen before like top secret files on the top of it and all the rest of it. So this is spectacularly blown up in their face. Trump classified document trial postponed indefinitely days after mishandled evidence bombshell. And we've got the judge's ruling right here.

CHAPTER 08 / 49 Discussion

Senator Kevin Parker, Adult Survivors Act Unconstitutionality Claim

New York State Senator Kevin Parker, who helped pass the Adult Survivors Act, is now challenging the law's constitutionality after being sued for an alleged 2004 rape. The law previously allowed E. Jean Carroll to sue Donald Trump despite the statute of limitations having expired. Parker's legal reversal occurs as he faces allegations from a former flood relief volunteer.

kevin parker· adult survivors act· e. jean carroll· new york· rape allegations

15:49 breaking news Trump classified documents case delayed indefinitely and then breaking New York State Senator Kevin Parker who worked to pass the adult Survivors Act which allowed E. Jean Carroll to go after Trump with accusations from 30 years ago now says the law is unconstitutional after a rape lawsuit has been filed against him. So let's play those two clips back to back clip 16 and 17 back to back. Let me go to the great Roger Stone. I do want to get first some breaking news out of another of Mr. Trump's legal cases I'm just being told about in my ear here. This is the federal classified documents case getting delayed indefinitely, is it? Talk to us about that. It was scheduled for May 20th, right?

16:30 Right, we're just getting our own eyes on this order here, but Judge Cannon making it clear that the trial over classified documents is delayed indefinitely in Florida. This federal indictment leads to the question of whether this trial would begin before the November election, and I think they would be safe to say that this order here from Judge Cannon in Florida answers that question. And so we could very well be looking at a reality that the only criminal trial, only one of four, that Donald Trump is facing here, that will take place before the November election, will be this one here that is now in its fourth week in New York over the alleged hush money payment scheme.

17:13 In 2004, a 31-year-old woman named Olga Jean Baptiste was helping Brooklyn State Senator Kevin Parker arrange relief for flood victims in Haiti. She now says after she returned from her trip there, Parker visited her apartment to pick up some photos and discuss the trip. According to a lawsuit filed Friday, she then stood up to say goodbye when Senator Parker held on to both of her wrists with his hands. Plaintiff was frozen in fear and was unable to cry out. Senator Parker then took plaintiff down the hallway of her apartment to her bedroom, made a sexual comment and put her face down on the bed, then raped her.

17:50 Governor Hochul called the allegations deeply disturbing. It is shocking, absolutely shocking. That's all I'll say, it's shocking. Parker has a long history of run-ins with the law, including charges for assaulting a traffic agent in 2005. In 2009, he was arrested and later found guilty on misdemeanor charges after assaulting a New York Post photographer. Here's what he told New York One after the verdict. You have an anger problem that some people can maintain? I won my election 76%. I think that my constituents understand my passion. The new lawsuit was filed under the Adult Survivors Act, which lifted the statute of limitations for one year to allow victims of sexual abuse to file suit, regardless of when the abuse occurred.

CHAPTER 09 / 49 Discussion

Roger Stone, Jack Smith Appointments Clause Challenge

Roger Stone discusses a legal challenge to Special Counsel Jack Smith's authority under the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. The argument posits that Smith's appointment is illegitimate because he was not confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Stone claims the Florida documents case was a "setup" involving the National Archives and the Biden Justice Department to frame Donald Trump.

roger stone· jack smith· appointments clause· article ii· department of justice

18:32 I'm glad I could sign the Adult Survivor Act that created the window for so many people who have cases like this to be able to come forward. So we made that happen. So everything they touch is turning to crap. They don't have the Midas touch, it doesn't turn to gold, it turns to crap. Like Roger likes to say, he doesn't get his news from MSNBC just like he doesn't get his food out of the toilet. Everybody's turning against him, ladies and gentlemen. And I've talked about this on the street. I see it on the street. Nothing but love now. 99.9%. and all these former liberals like Naomi Wolf, the list goes on and on are coming out and saying, I love Alex Jones. He was right. He was dead on. It's not about me being right. It's about that's a marker for how awake people are. So Roger Stone, thanks for coming on two days in a row. Stonezone.com to find your great show. This is just amazing. The tables have completely turned. I want to talk about these cases and this big development in Florida with the federal case with Jack Smith against Trump and the documents. But then we've got to, you know,

19:35 You know, like the wolf says in Pulp Fiction, let's not start celebrating yet. They're not going to give up. So we'll talk about what you expect is going to happen there. Roger Stone. Thanks for having me again today, Alec. You're right. This is bombshell news. Now, I think it's important to be clear that the Florida documents case is not dead. The judge has not ruled on a number of motions in that case, including a motion that questions The legitimacy of Jack Smith's appointment entirely under the appointments clause article two section two of the Constitution. It would appear.

20:14 to have this kind of legal authority, Mr. Smith would have had to have been confirmed by the U.S. Senate. There is no statutory authority for the creation of his position. So that could knock out all of these federal cases, including the January 6th election interference case, which is still pending. Nonetheless, very good news for the Trump campaign because the whole purpose of a pre-election trial in Florida or in DC is to drain his time. Make him sit in a courtroom when he should be out campaigning. Secondarily, drain his campaign funds because he has to pay his lawyers. By the way, the Democratic National Committee is paying for Joe Biden's lawyers in the special counsel investigation into him. Trump would not be under investigation if he wasn't running for president. So it's a legitimate political expense. And then, of course, lastly,

21:16 the ongoing attempt to try to blacken his name. That's what the Stormy Daniels testimony yesterday was all about. She's not central to the government's case, so she was brought in to provide salacious and titillating and presumably humiliating and embarrassing testimony against the president. Frankly, based on what I saw, I think it may have backfired because she also reveals her animus and her hatred for Donald Trump, thus providing the motive for jurors to suspect, well, she has a reason why she might be lying. But this is a huge victory in Florida, just from a timing point of view. I would also note that in addition to the motion that could remove Jack Smith entirely as a special counsel,

22:15 The judge in that case has been ordering the government to unredact more and more and more. You see, they want to prosecute Trump in secret. So you never even know what the so-called documents were about. You don't know anything about them. But the more you look at this case, the more it looks like a In other words, the Bureau, the National Archives connived with the Biden Justice Department and with the White House counsel to send Trump documents on pallets that he hadn't asked for, and then once they confirmed his receipt, claimed that he was in possession of

CHAPTER 10 / 49 Discussion

Supreme Court Immunity Ruling, Potential Civil Unrest

The upcoming Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity will determine if Donald Trump can face trial for January 6-related charges before the election. There are concerns that the "deep state" plans to trigger civil unrest or use the Insurrection Act to prevent a second Trump inauguration. The discussion suggests that political opponents may resort to extreme measures if legal challenges fail to stop Trump's momentum.

supreme court· presidential immunity· insurrection act· civil unrest· deep state

22:56 of documents he wasn't legally, according to them, supposed to have. Well, Roger, I mean, look, look, look, that's par for the course here. But if you pull back from this, we just had the Supreme Court a few weeks ago suspend some of these cases. And now that's happened in this case. Clearly, it's being recognized now that this is what we all see it as, prima facie, a witch hunt, an attempt to steal the election, to not let us have the candidate we want. Again, the deep state's only doubling down. So what do you expect them to do now? Well, first of all, I'm not a lawyer, as you know, but I still don't think it is impossible for them to potentially get Trump to trial on the January 6 election interference matters.

23:45 in, say, even September and October of this year. I think that will be their drive. Now, that depends entirely on the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on whether or not he has immunity for his actions as president, or whether he has immunity for certain actions and not other actions. I'm not really clear on exactly what the Supreme Court is going to do. If they can get the president to trial by as late as October, they would still do so. Jay Bratt, who was one of the lawyers on Jack Smith's team, argued in front of Judge Kannon that trying

24:31 a high profile picture like this in an election that could affect the outcome of election, which has always been against DOGA policy, is not a violation in this case. Again, special rules for Donald Trump. Absolutely. And to be clear, Roger, that's all key information. But let's pull back. You see, I'm not a lawyer, but you've been through all this. You're one of the top political analysts in the country. You're the guy that helped Trump run and win and all that. So much of this is political. The law doesn't even matter now. They're not even following any of that. It's all purely political pure theater The trials against me were literally HBO productions with makeup and crews and people's you know slapping, you know live You'll cut and action things and the the judge went to the premiere at South by Southwest and walked the red carpet and in standing ovations like she was an actress in it because she was We've won that battle. I'm talking about

25:28 So I speak specific what they're going to do because they know this is all blown with their face. Well, they said they're going to have civil insurrection. They already got bills introduced to pull the power of the president to be able to declare the acts that are in law, the insurrection act to block that. They're never gonna let him get, if they have their way, to January 21st, 2025. They are going to burn the country down when and if he's president-elect, then use that pressure against the judiciary and the Republicans that will make it stop if you go ahead and greenlight going ahead and sending Trump to prison. And so I don't think, I know that is their plan. They've admitted that's their plan to their desperate minions, saying, don't worry, we'll just burn the country down.

26:11 Alex, I'm afraid I wish I could disagree with you, but I really can't. Our conversation yesterday was really, really disturbing to me because you were very candid about the fact that you've had a couple dreams that brought into question the president's safety. This is something I really worry about. And I've never had those. I've never had those. Knowing Trump eight, nine years, I've never had those dreams. But knowing Trump, he is unstoppable. He is not ever going to stop. He's never going to quit. He'll fight his way through these trials. He'll fight his way through a spirited campaign. He can't wait to debate.

CHAPTER 11 / 49 Discussion

Phil Mudd, CIA Assassination Rhetoric Allegations

A 2017 clip of former CIA official Phil Mudd is used to suggest that the intelligence community has considered "killing" Donald Trump metaphorically or otherwise. The segment references historical events like the JFK assassination and the attempt on Ronald Reagan to argue that the "deep state" poses a physical threat to Trump. The host claims to have provided evidence of these threats to the Secret Service.

phil mudd· cia· assassination· jfk· secret service

26:47 I fear an effort to harm him, an effort to get him out of the way. It's a legitimate concern. Do I have evidence of that? I do not have evidence of it. But I wrote an entire book on the assassination of a president, the man who killed Kennedy. Hold on, Roger. Let's talk about this. You don't have evidence. I never played it yesterday. Get the clip. We have Phil Mudd and the former, you know, I can play a 30 minute. I can play a head CIA guy saying we're going to kill this guy. I can play in 30 minutes of them saying we're going to kill him. They're foaming at the mouth like dogs on chains that have rabies wanting to get him stay right there. Stone zone dot com. Please remember our sponsors info war store dot com and Dr Jones

27:28 amazing products and it funds this operation. We're in the thick of this fight. We need your prayers, your word of mouth and your financial support. Get great products at the same time. DrJonesNaturals.com and InfowarsStore.com. Back in stock at InfowarsStore.com. Nitric Boost, back in stock at DrJonesNaturals.com. Next level foundational energy. Go to both sites, DrJonesNaturals.com and InfowarsStore.com now. So here's the CIA agent that actually headed up clandestine foreign assassinations saying five years ago the deep state's gonna kill President Trump. I could play it 50 of these clips but just here's one to talk about we do have evidence when the main agency, the most powerful covert agency in the world, was overthrown more than 50 governments and obviously killed JFK is talking about killing Trump. They mean it when they say it. Here it is.

28:24 with a very important country not only for geopolitical reasons but because they meddled in our election and there's investigations going on. I can't accept that as an excuse and I think other people should press him for a better answer. What was your response Phil Mudd? A couple surprises let me give you one bottom line as a former government official government's gonna kill this guy He defends Vladimir Putin. Their State Department and CIA offers are coming home. And at Langley and at Foggy Bottom, CIA and State, they're saying, this is how you defend us? Phil, before I may not want to ask you a question, but Phil, just to reiterate, obviously when you're talking about killing, you're using that as a metaphor. You're not talking about... What I'm saying is, people talk about the deep state. When you disrespect government officials who've done 20 or 30 years, they're going to say,

29:08 Really? Vladimir Putin sends officers home and you support him before you support us? I just want to underline. Amanda, you're... And there's hours of this. So they believe they own America, they sold out America, and this is what they want to do to the populist president because he's not a traitor like they are. And back at the time, Brennan did a C-SPAN talk with a bunch of spies. And he said, we're going to take him out in the next six months, he will be gone. And it's not going to be an election, it's not going to be impeachment. And they said, what do you mean? You mean assassination? He laughed and smiled.

29:45 So I went on there and said, I had like 15 examples then, and I put a video out then, and I said they're talking about killing the president. And it's not like some, you know, drunk schizophrenic in Albuquerque saying it. It's the most powerful evil agency that does this in the world. Like if Mike Tyson in his prime said, I'm gonna beat my neighbor to death, you take it real serious. So Then the Secret Service calls me and wants to meet with me and they say, okay, yeah, Trump wants us to come hear your evidence. They said, now where's this evidence they're talking about killing him? And I sent them the clips and I said, you don't know about this? They're like, no. Oh, exactly, because you're only worried about some Islamic or some crazy person, and that's a threat. What about the big agency that's killed a president before? Tried to kill Reagan.

CHAPTER 12 / 49 Discussion

Trump's Safety, Roger Stone's Final Analysis

Roger Stone expresses concern for Donald Trump's physical safety, citing the president's status as an existential threat to the established power structure. Stone reports that Trump remains in excellent spirits and views his mission as preordained. The segment concludes with Stone's prediction that Trump is inexorably headed back to the White House despite ongoing criminal prosecutions.

donald trump· secret service· stonezone· 2024 election· treason

30:29 And boy, that story's very clear. So Roger, that's why I'm saying this is so serious. When every option fails the deep state and nothing can stop Trump, I am seriously worried about his physical safety. Alex, I don't think that your concern is misplaced. I mean, you're absolutely right. They did kill one president, JFK. They knew it'd be too suspicious, so they removed Richard Nixon in a bloodless coup. They very definitely attempted to assassinate Ronald Reagan. That is the topic of my next upcoming book. They were willing to unleash a pandemic on the American people to try to affect an election. So there is no limit to what they might do. We have to pray for two things. First of all, that President Trump's daily protection from the Secret Service, and I met some of these agents, they are dedicated public servants committed to doing their job,

31:28 Many of them develop an affection for the president when they serve on his detail for a long period of time. We have to pray that they do their job well. We also have to pray here for just divine protection of not only the president, but his family. They understand that Trump is an existential threat to their entire way of life and to their influence and power and money over the country. So they understand that if a newly educated, if a much wiser Donald Trump gets back into the White House, no, it's not revenge.

32:11 It is actual respect for the rule of law. See, liberals talk endlessly about the rule of law, but the truth is they don't respect it at all. In fact, they violate the law regularly, and they twist our governmental agencies to have a political purpose. In this particular case, And many who have broken the law, many of whom are actually guilty of treason, treasonous activities, for which there is no statute of limitations in terms of a time limit on when they could be prosecuted in those instances where there's a strong case, they understand that the return of Trump to the White House is going to mean extraordinarily, extraordinary

32:59 accountability. That's right. And that is why I think they will do anything necessary to stop him. Absolutely. We've got to be serious about the waters we're in. In closing, Roger, you talk to Trump all the time. You guys are confidants. You can't get into private stuff. But how is he doing? You've already kind of mentioned this. He's stronger than ever. How is the real big guy doing? Yeah, his mood is just incredibly good. I spoke to him two nights ago, I guess it was, and he was in excellent spirits. I mean, he's a fatalist to begin with. He thinks that all of this is preordained by the Lord. He understands that he's on a mission. He's very optimistic about the election. He doesn't seem to be deterred or

33:49 or depressed about any of these obstacles have been put in his way. Is he angry? Yes, he's a little angry. He has every right to be angry. He's being framed as no previous president has been. And he knows that, in fact, he's actually done nothing wrong. Why didn't they bring any of these prosecutions in the first year of Joe Biden's presidency? Why are we, why are they rushing against the clock now in the fourth year of Biden's presidency? Because they have figured out, first of all, perhaps they thought he was not going to be re-nominated, and therefore the problem would solve itself. He won the nomination in smashing fashion, setting records in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Super Tuesday.

34:32 And now they realize that he may be inexorably headed back to the White House. And that could mean serious criminal prosecution for people who have engaged in treason. No, it is not weaponizing the Department of Justice against your political opponents. It's about holding people in high-level government positions accountable for their violations of the law. Well that's right Roger, let me say this in closing, you'll be 20 seconds to finish. They started the fight, they drew first blood, Trump would be a traitor if he didn't remove the deep state and stop this coup against our republic. So they've done it, they're out in the open, the whole world's turning against them, not just America. They are screwed. Final comment.

35:19 Alex, I pray that you are right. Look, in politics, a day is a lifetime. And the dynamics of this entire situation could change by Saturday. But at the same time, I'm a veteran of 13 national presidential campaigns. I'm a pretty shrewd analysis of polling data and trends. And I'm telling you, Donald Trump is headed back to the White House. Roger Stone, stonezone.com. Talk to you soon, my friend. Be safe. Thank you, Alex. God bless you. All right, Dr. Andrew Wakefield and another special guest are he's a new film coming out. The original OG when it comes to exposing poison shots is coming up next in the entire next hour after that. And then Nick Foyntes two hours on the First Amendment and beyond. Please support the broadcast and realize I need your word of mouth, your prayers and you to go get great products at info or store dot com like nitric boost back in stock 40% off.

CHAPTER 13 / 49 Discussion

Protocol 7 Film, Dr. Andrew Wakefield Interview

Dr. Andrew Wakefield and actress Emmy Robbin introduce the new film "Protocol 7," which dramatizes a real-life legal case involving allegations of fraud regarding the MMR vaccine. The film follows a small-town lawyer and a whistleblower as they confront corporate malpractice at Merck. The project aims to expose long-standing issues within the vaccine industry that predate the COVID-19 pandemic.

protocol 7· andrew wakefield· emmy robbin· merck· mmr vaccine

36:16 and the new stock. Bodies in stock discounted ultimate fish oil back in stock 40% off highest grade fish oil. Even the mainstream media admits that's really great for you. That's an info war store dot com or triple 8 to 533139 and our other great sponsor that lets the operation. Can you and you can get it at our website. Dr Jones naturals .com. My dad's company, incredible supplements, incredible nano silver products, the very best out there at Dr Jones natural .com. The entire line of super blue. Fluoride free nano silver toothpaste with a tea tree, It's concentrated, it's all there, drjonesnaturals.com. We have the next level of foundational energy, look into that, it's incredible. And of course we have Rocket Rest, the natural sleep aid that's so incredible. All of that at drjonesnaturals.com, drjonesnaturals.com. All right, special guest, Dr. Andrew Wakefield and others. Straight ahead on the other side of this quick break, stay with us. And then in an hour and 15 minutes,

37:21 Making the mRNA is really easy and really cheap and that's the magic of this thing but there's no doubt in the next five years we can you know we just need to mess around there's a lot of lipid nanoparticles and some are very self-assembly and some are very self-assembly and some are very self-assembly. This is nano construction. I don't even begin to understand how far ahead of where we thought our technology was. He was an orphan of conflict in Africa. He was smart and bright and then we got him home and he crashed right in front of us. Apparently, we're in the midst of a mumps outbreak. Another?

38:13 Some people, some very important people, are saying our vaccine does not work. You're gonna want to read this. We have a U.S. monopoly and a major share of the world market for MMR. And we own the only one that works. Except that it does not. We all sign contracts, gentlemen. Company interests above all others. Make it work. They fake the data. It's all there. They cheated on every level. You said you're a lawyer. Family law. And you want to understand why? Let me see it. They couldn't get the result they wanted, so they re-engineered it. Not objective to improve the vaccine, but find something that gets them the result they want. Fix it, gentlemen. 96%. If the vaccine fails, we're all out of a job. It has failed. You need to get what's going on here. Is he in danger? Internal memos were released. Quote, we may have to seek them out and destroy them where they live. Chilling notes. And yes,

39:15 He is in danger. What about Eshal? Your son and every other son and daughter depends on whether or not you choose to live by their rules. Incineration. Immediately. Can't we trust him to keep it together? Were you aware? Some tests included the weakened strain, I believe. And did you approve? I guess so. Were you aware of the lab's failure to demonstrate efficacy of the mumps vaccine? A level required by the FDA? No. To respond to the FDA's concerns. And leave a dangerous vaccine on the market. Dangerous? Objection. Strongly recommended booster shots. Of course you did. What have they got? It's right, nothing is what they got. Would you please identify this document for us? Please identify exhibit two for me. They've got stuff. No, wait, wait, wait!

40:00 Exhibit three, please. This is a confidential document. Objection. These were shredded. It's a protocol. They've got the sheets. They've got the evidence I was told they didn't have. No one will ever believe them again. The new film is Protocol 7. Dr. Andy J. Wakefield is our guest and Emmy Robyn, who I've interviewed years ago, a great activist and actress as well. Emmy Robinson, doula.com. She's also a doula, can talk about what she's witnessing with the children and the injections. Protocol7.movie.

CHAPTER 14 / 49 Discussion

Vaccine Safety Awakening, Global Tipping Point

Dr. Wakefield asserts that more than half of the adult population is now skeptical of vaccine safety following the COVID-19 pandemic. He reflects on 30 years of advocacy, stating that his motivation comes from seeking justice for children damaged by injections. The discussion highlights a growing "tipping point" where the public no longer trusts official health narratives.

vaccine safety· autism· covid-19· big pharma· medical freedom

40:45 the first time. It's great to have you guys here. We got about seven minutes to break to kind of introduce what's happened. We get into the film later. Get into it now, but talk about vindication. Very, very sad vindication, though, with all this come out and the main vaccine pushers are all over TV saying we never made you take it. Never said it would work. We never said Ivermectin was bad. This This is an incredible moment where in Switzerland of Garvey and the UN and the WHO and they said there the head of their vaccine program The majority of our doctors don't believe in this we're hurting people. We're just told to test on the public What are we gonna do and then magically the virus appears and they tried to double down but now that's blown with their face It seems like the greatest crime in history really are these shots dr. Wakefield that's coming out now well the fascinating thing Alex and thank you very much for

41:45 having me back on. But when I first got involved in this 30 years ago, in the issue of vaccine safety, there were literally a handful of people worldwide who were prepared to talk about this uncomfortable issue. And because of movies like Vaxxed and this one, because of COVID, we now have a population of supporters who are probably more than half the adult population of the world. And so the attitude has changed. The timing of this movie could not be better because what this does is people were saying, look, this is a covid vaccine. The childhood vaccines are safe. We have nothing to worry about.

42:27 This film takes them back over that bridge to say, no, no, no, this has been happening for many years. These companies didn't just start behaving like this recently, they have been behaving like this for many, many years. And so the timing of this film, which is going to be coming out this month, later this month, is absolutely perfect. Well, it looks amazing. I can't wait to see it. I notice it follows real life things, I guess from a quasi fictional account of it. it's just mind blowing that they keep doubling down. Pfizer had over the weekend, Albert Bourla said, don't worry, cancer's the new COVID. And then it plunged when they did a single person test of a new gene therapy and the little boy had a heart attack.

43:16 You know if that had been a traditional vaccine that would have stopped everything right there but no this has become too big to fail. The whole Covid initiative, the money they're earning, the credibility that they have to try and maintain and failing to maintain public confidence that It's the biggest mistake they ever made because as I say it has aligned so many people, right-thinking people, with the idea that actually no we don't know what these vaccines do. They've not been shown to be safe and effective and they are potentially dangerous for our children. Well Dr. Wakefield, people say I'm tomorrow's news today going back 30 years ago or 25 years ago you are tomorrow's news today and I haven't asked you this because I just saw you as you came in. You had you set up we talked like one minute

44:03 But people say, don't you feel good you've been vindicated? No, I feel horrible. We didn't stop it. How do you feel being completely vindicated? No, I would rather that none of this had ever happened. I'm fine. I mean, I'm healthy and life goes on. and people say, aren't you know, the tragedy that happened in your life? No, no, no, no, no. I don't have a problem. If ever I sulk, Alex, all I do is I look in the mirror and I say, this child with autism has a problem. I don't have a problem. So shut up and get on with it. Stop complaining. Because we that's what I do anytime. I'm feeling sorry. I think about all the kids. They've heard and guilt Yeah, and we've got to do what we can to put that right to get justice for those children and to prevent future Harm to children and I said something key though Half the adult population that's fair to say is awake now. It's growing. They've lost. This is their big globalists screwed the pooch

CHAPTER 15 / 49 Discussion

Mother's Intuition, Protocol 7 Production Details

The film "Protocol 7" emphasizes the power of a mother's intuition in identifying vaccine injury when medical professionals dismiss concerns. The production features actor Eric Roberts and was directed by Dr. Wakefield, who views film as a medium to reach the 75% of the public who do not follow traditional news. The film has reportedly won 17 movie awards ahead of its release.

mother's intuition· eric roberts· protocol 7· independent film· medical autonomy

44:58 They did. They made a terrible, terrible mistake. They wanted to control people. They wanted to see if their policy could be forced upon people through precisely a mechanism of fear. Fear, fear, fear is the currency. And it failed because they treated the public as being stupid. The public are not stupid. They're not. And most importantly, and what this film brings out, is the mother's intuition what drives the there are two elements to the film Alex one is the factual content of what Merck actually did in order to try and protect their vaccine and their license and the other thing is the extraordinary power of a mother's intuition she knew this was going on small-town family lawyer her own child damage and she takes it on despite

45:48 repeated conflict throughout the entire film. Conflict with her doctor, conflict with her husband, conflict with everybody until she finally takes this over the line at the end. And I remember first interviewing you over 20 years ago, you said it was the mothers that came to you. So I see the imprint in this film of what you've experienced. Absolutely. The mother in this film is really an amalgam of the thousands of mothers that I've interviewed as a clinician over the years and who have taught me far more about autism, childhood developmental disorders, vaccine safety than any of my colleagues in medicine and science have ever done. So how do people get behind the film? How do they support it?

46:30 Right, there will be several releases of this film. It will come out firstly as a premiere across the country called the People's Premiere. This is a theatrical on-demand and I have Emmy Robin Hood who's become the expert on this topic so she can tell you about that. Then we have the New York premiere, we then have an Austin premiere to which you're coming, then we have the LA premiere and then it goes out across the country as a standard. I notice you've got some big actors in this. This looks really good. We do. We got... We got Eric Roberts, a wonderful actor. In fact, during the filming, he took a week off because we didn't need him. He went and shot two other movies in Texas. I've never known a man work so hard. And I was, in fact, speaking to his wife last night, and they're going to be coming to the L.A. premiere. Well, I'm really proud to be associated with you. Emmy, Rob, we're going to come back with you in a moment. We're going to join some stations. Some stations carry the second and third hour. We're going to come back and talk about this because it's through cinema, it's through music, it's through culture. We really want

47:30 win the war. We focus on news all day, but the real fight is in art. If we think about what's happened the last four plus years... and how humanity barely struggled out of it and is now rallying against it. We can't forget what was done and say never again because the UN, the World Health Organization, the treaties, the bird flu, all the fear, they're trying to come back in again and do it. And I see Pfizer stock plunging. They just killed this little kid with their newest test. One person in the trial dead, heart attack.

CHAPTER 16 / 49 Discussion

Emmy Robbin, Acting Career and Medical Freedom

Actress and doula Emmy Robbin discusses how COVID-19 mandates prevented her from auditioning for mainstream films due to her stance on medical freedom. She describes her role in "Protocol 7" as a "serendipitous" opportunity to align her professional acting career with her passion for body autonomy. Robbin highlights the success of "The People's Premiere" screenings across the country.

emmy robbin· doula· body autonomy· covid mandates· independent cinema

48:11 And I'm not a doctor like you, Dr. Wakefield, but I read the scientific literature and they've had mRNA for 30 years and they tried on rats, they tried on guinea pigs, they do a few human trials. It kills a good percentage of people, attacks the liver, attacks the heart. I don't know, you know why you're a doctor, I don't. But to Emmy, Robin, I've known you for years through Lee and McAdoo, you've been a guest on the show. Thanks for having me. And you were telling me in the break now you're a mom and it's so beautiful and all the rest of it. Tell us for a few minutes about this film and why protocol seven is so important. Well, I mean, the basis of the film, you know, I have followed Dr. Wakefield for years back, you know, when Vaxxed came out and with my personal professional career as a doula and childbirth educator, I refer people to watch Vaxxed if they ask me about vaccinating their child, I say, hey, this is a really great

48:59 Um, I think it's a really, um, place to get you know information if you're looking and I'm excited to be able to have them watch protocol seven. As another option. It's going to be really great to refer that. But you know, as an actress as well, um, you know my other profession. I actually couldn't be an actress for many years after Covid because in order to even just audition. We would be I was like, I'm not going to be able to slate your vaccine status and. Just being somebody who you know is all about medical freedom and body autonomy, and I just I didn't. I felt like it wasn't anybody's business to know what my vaccine status was, and so I wasn't able to even audition for films and then protocol seven came across my desk and I just felt very serendipitous. I've followed

49:56 you're not going to be in a great film. You're not going to be up ahead of being an actress. But then when you can be in a great film and tell the truth, that's what it's all about. Because acting is great and being is great, except it's so controlled. That's why the independent films are so important. I mean, it was a blessing. Truthfully Covid was a blessing to me, and I see it with a lot of other people. It actually. forced me to focus on another passion and my true passion, which is, you know, protecting women, protecting babies, body autonomy, medical freedom. So yeah, this film as an actress, this is the first project as an actress that means so much to me personally as well. So I feel really honored just to be a part of this project.

50:39 The fact that is with Andy's somebody that I've you know admired for many years It was really cool, and he is an amazing director by the way like really really good You're not just one of the probably the biggest first doctor expose all this you're also a director now. Yeah, you know medicine is about the study of human behavior and film is about the replication of human behavior and often under the most adverse circumstances, rather like medical practice. And I loved it. I studied it for a long time and it was a great privilege to to be able to direct. It was terrifying, absolutely terrifying, but you're surrounded by a wonderful crew and producers and actors who just make it easy for you, make you look good. And surprisingly, Alex, and I don't think Emmy knows this, that in the last two days we've won 17 movie awards. What? 17 movie awards. Oh, that's so

51:31 that's so cool. Protocol seven. So, uh, yeah, it's, uh, it's extraordinary and not the awards are not the motive. They're just, it's a sign of people waking up. It's when I get on air and tell people, Hey, we're having a big success. Oh, I'm big and great. No, it's the opposite. I'm just a focal point is as weak as I am. It shows there's a hunger for freedom. Absolutely. And people, when Vax came out, you know, it was, it was in Tribeca. It was banned from Tribeca. The De Niro went on television and said this film should have played, we did the wrong thing, everybody should watch it. It exploded worldwide. I'll be really interested to see how they respond to this film. You know, and if they come for us, they come for us. But you never ever make a decision based in fear. The one thing I've learned in life is never make a decision based in fear. All right, Protocol 7 is the film.

CHAPTER 17 / 49 Discussion

Dr. Thomas Levy, COVID-19 Vaccine Heart Damage

Dr. Thomas Levy estimates that COVID-19 vaccines have caused heart injury in at least 2.8% of recipients, potentially affecting millions of Americans. Data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) shows over 37,000 reported deaths linked to the shots. The segment also notes a federal court's requirement for the FDA to retract statements regarding its smear campaign against ivermectin.

thomas levy· myocarditis· troponin test· vaers· ivermectin

52:21 We're going to come back after a one-minute break. I'm going to play a short clip here dealing with facts. Dr. Thomas Levy on the massive heart injuries being caused. Straight ahead, stay with us. ...deaths in England and Wales and has attributed these to a combination of factors such as, and this is what it says, the prevalence of heart disease, flu, and heart disease. So the emphasis there is on heart disease. But of course, there are many people who feel that the increase in heart conditions and heart disease has been exacerbated by the very vaccines which people were persuaded to take in order to protect them against COVID-19. And I have a quote here from somebody called

53:16 Dr. Thomas Levy, who was writing again last year, he said this, he said on his estimate vaccines are causing heart injury in at least 2.8% of people who receive the COVID injections. And he estimated that a minimum of 7 million Americans now have hearts damaged by COVID vaccines. And although there's no way of being certain at this time, it's within the realm of possibility that over 100 million people in America have some degree of heart damage from the injections, not myocarditis, but heart damage that would be detectable with a troponin test. Thank you, Chairman. Now, obviously, the FDA made a mistake in granting the emergency use authorization and license of COVID-19 vaccines.

54:06 It has been confirmed that the vaccines do not stop transmission. Moreover, 1,635,048 injuries due to COVID-19 vaccines have been reported to the Health and Human Services through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, including 37,382 deaths. Considering that under 10,300 deaths have been reported due to all other vaccines combined, the harm due to COVID-19 vaccines is absolutely staggering. And not to mention that there is no accountability. Legally, it is impossible to sue COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers for the injuries caused by their products.

54:47 Just last month, the federal court forced the FDA to retract tweets and statements for its years-long smear campaign against ivermectin as an effective treatment for COVID-19. All right, Protocol 7 is the new film. Dr. Andrew Wakefield and one of the great people in the film, Emmy Robbins, is here with us. She's also a doula and has witnessed what's actually going on with the children. And I want you guys to jump in and take over here. Don't let me direct this because you've got so many points you want to make. But after you make key points just about the general world we're in right now, both, you know, me and Andy.

CHAPTER 18 / 49 Discussion

Global Fertility Decline, mRNA Long-Term Effects

The discussion explores the potential link between mRNA injections and a global decline in fertility and sperm motility. Insurance companies have noted an unprecedented spike in excess deaths among young people, which some European firms reportedly labeled as "suicide" due to the experimental nature of the products. Dr. Wakefield warns that the World Health Organization is attempting to usurp national sovereignty over public health.

fertility· sperm count· gavi· world health organization· excess deaths

55:25 You hit on it without me asking at the start, when you just joined us a few minutes ago at the start, at the end of the hour, Dr. Whitefield, they have completely screwed up and people go, great, we're beating them, everybody's waking up, but they're so evil they're gonna strike back. This moment is so dangerous, it's so huge, when the old power structure is completely naked in front of the world, how would you quantify this moment we're in right now? It's precarious, just as you say, so many people have been damaged, and so many people have yet to manifest the damage caused by the messenger or the mRNA injections. And it's, I don't know how we're going to cope with it. I don't know how we're going to address it. These are healthy young people who would otherwise go on to live a full and productive life. And so

56:20 Even though the great majority of people are waking up to this and saying no to the fifth sick booster, we're not doing this, we don't trust you anymore. The damage, much of the damage is already done and it's become too big to fail. These companies have made too much money out of it. too much control, too much invested by the World Health Organization, by unelected groups like Gavi to push this upon us. And we're going through these battles at the moment with the World Health Organization trying to usurp our individual decision-making and our national decision-making about public health. And that's got to be fought tooth and nail. And it's films like this that will help it bring it to the fore

57:06 and really show people, you know, what's behind the curtain. And I think that's the importance of this. What happens to us after this, whether they come after us or not, is irrelevant. We have to speak our truth. We have to get this out there because without this, this story would have been buried. It would have been three lines on page five of the New York Times and no one would ever know, the public, the children who've actually been exposed to this ineffective and ultimately dangerous vaccine would never know and it would be business as usual and that cannot be allowed to happen. There must be accountability.

57:47 And we're live right now and usually when a host says something really great or a guest say, hey, put that as a clip up front. We're going to put this out as a report later at Bandai Video on X. We'll get millions of views, probably tens of millions. That clip of what he just said goes up front because that really quantifies where we are, the power structure doubling down in trouble just absolutely committed to what they're doing and trying to silence, just as you were silenced decades ago, really patient zero. They've now gone after thousands of scientists and doctors and nurses and people. But despite that, they had courage and they were basically basically overridden by this. And another key point you made, and then I want Emmy to comment on this, is that so many people, like 20% of the public on average, that's the number that I've seen, maybe 25%,

58:36 get their news from news. Most people just ignore news, they get it from movies. And so that's why this is so important as we cover the 25%, and then the people that really want to know, but we're trying to get to the people that don't. that's why we're doing this. No, that's why this film Protocol. Seven is so important. I mean, can you speak to that? Yeah I mean, we also. Obviously are releasing nationwide on the 31st and we want theaters to pick up this film. But before then, on the 29th, they're doing a people's showing so you can actually go to the website and you can host your own

59:19 I'm a big fan of the movie. I actually did one here in Austin, and I sold it out in 48 hours, and so they added another theater for me, and we sold that one out. So there's obviously a demand for people. Wanting to see this film and yeah, it's that just is a testament to people waking up and people being aware of the nature of this film, so the power and they've every reason to be. And I think there are rats leaving the sinking ship. And the other point you raised is that there are some very, very eminent, highly published physicians who have said, you know, this COVID vaccine is wrong. And then as they've gone into it, and dug deeper, gone down the rabbit hole, they said this applies not just to the COVID shot, but to

1:00:09 all the childhood vaccines as well, they have not been properly tested. We weren't aware of this and it's alarming and you could only fire so many people like Peter McCullough and Paul Maric who've published hundreds of eminent scientific papers. You can only do that so often and then everybody's going to say hang on, hang on I know this guy, I've read his paper. But we've reached the tipping point. We have, we are over the tipping point and now the truth will emerge. It's uncomfortable, it's going to be painful, it doesn't do anything for the children who've been damaged along the way or those who've been damaged by the COVID shot. But nonetheless, this is what winning looks like. It's painful, it's uncomfortable, but this is the reality. It's a war. It's a war and we must keep going.

CHAPTER 19 / 49 Discussion

Maternal Instinct Anecdote, Natural Childbirth Benefits

Dr. Wakefield shares a personal anecdote about his ex-wife using a "sixth sense" to save their daughter from drowning, illustrating the visceral connection between mother and child. Emmy Robbin discusses the benefits of natural, unmedicated home births for maternal bonding and infant health. They argue that medicalized hospital procedures often disrupt the natural hormonal and biological synchronization between mothers and newborns.

maternal instinct· home birth· breastfeeding· physiological birth· bonding

1:00:54 Well, I don't just go off their own admissions. I go off the body language and what I see in the public. But you look at Borla of Pfizer, you look at Bill Gates, you look at Klaus Schwab, they look like they've seen a ghost. They, I mean, they're gibbering idiots now because they realize it didn't work. I mean, here's an example. Joe Rogan will post a clip of Bill Gates saying it's safe and effective, but 80% have bad side effects and it gets 50 million views or more and I'll see 200,000 comments and can't find one for Gates. I mean when you've got numbers like that you're in deep trouble. Yeah it's really alarming. They've made a terrible mistake. One of the things that you highlighted Alex is that people's visceral reaction

1:01:43 is so important. It's not cerebral, it's a gut reaction. When I see you and you're lying, I know you're lying. Instinctive. And medicine teaches you this. Medicine teaches you how to listen to people and invest in what they're telling you as the truth or not. And when you watch these people on television, when you watch them in interview, you know viscerally who you can trust and who you can't. Those instincts is our entire evolution. It's everything we are. It is. It's survival. Well, especially as parents when you have babies, when you have children, you're given this innate, women especially are given this.

1:02:23 that. It's just God given intuition to tap and tune into their baby from the cry from their body physically responds when a baby needs something, and you know, we have nature's vaccine in our breasts, right? So the woman knows what's good with the baby around it, correct, but we're being. forced with fear, right? Like Andy says, like we don't want to do things with fear leading the way. And I feel like the parents that I work with all the time, it comes, I mean, it starts in pregnancy, but when the baby is born, there's so much fear in their health. And it's, you know, it's why are we,

1:03:04 treating things that haven't happened yet when they play on the fear totally and It's if you don't do this, this is gonna happen to your child and that's not necessarily true And really the average worker is just a bureaucrat following orders. They're not all dr. Andrew Wakefield I mean, you can't get your kid in school. You can't take them to summer camp. You can't do any of these things unless you comply to whatever your state's mandates are. Let me tell you a story, because this is so important. It goes to this. If you've got time for a story, Alex. We've got plenty of time. Go ahead. Now I'm a storyteller. And I was on holiday with my family, on vacation in southern Spain in a villa up in the hills with my ex-wife and my four children.

1:03:46 They were very young at the time, and we were up in one of the bedrooms because my second son had a fever. And we were up there, and my wife was sitting on the bed, mopping his brow, and the rest of us were there. And then suddenly, she leapt up, she ran across the bedroom, she ran down the stairs, she ran through the kitchen, she ran across the courtyard, she ran across the second courtyard, into the pool area, and just dived full length into the pool just before my baby daughter took her last step. to be out of her depth and to certain death. Where did that come from? How did she know? I didn't know. She just knew something inside her, something visceral, not something... Well, tell the full story, the baby daughter, what was it? Oh, absolutely fine. Saved her.

1:04:35 But with... Well, explain the story. I'm missing it. She's there, you're... The baby daughter had gone. She'd gone out, we hadn't noticed it. She'd gone to the pool. She was going down the steps to certain death. Oh, wow, and your wife literally picked it up and ran. My wife just knew. She just knew. She had that sixth sense. Quite incredible. Because she ran down and saved her. Yeah. These two were once one. Yeah. They were connected and they will never be apart. They were once one body. It was absolutely fascinating. Sorry I missed the first part. That's amazing. So she literally psychically picks up my daughter's about to drown. Absolutely. None of us, none of the rest of us in the room had any clue and she knew.

1:05:14 It was the most vivid sort of insight into the power of a mother's... Psychic power. You saw her just rise up and run directly to where it was. No explanation. It wasn't that she was about to jump off a cliff, it wasn't that she was out on the highway, it was the pool. Oh, she was about to drown. Go back slowly, describe it. You're sitting there, the son's sick, she's mopping his brow. Sitting in the room. She's mopping my son's brow on the bed. The rest of the family, I thought, were in the room. I was in the room. Suddenly, she stops. She stops mopping his brow without a word, without a single word. She leapt up, she ran downstairs, she ran... It must have been 100 meters, 100 yards, and dived full length into the pool without hesitating, and caught my daughter just as she... Knew exactly. Exactly. To the millisecond.

1:06:08 And it was staggering, absolutely staggering. But that's the magic to know we are eternal beings. That is the proof right there. That is so powerful. I can tell you Alex, the women that I work with, when they have a natural, physiological, unmedicated, untouched home birth, their connection with their baby is out of this world. It's And I'm a testament to that. I mean, my first daughter was an emergency C-section and my second daughter was an all natural home birth. And I love them both, but my connection to the home birth is it's, I didn't mess with God's design at all. And it shows in the natural hormone process, my bonding, the amount of breast milk I produced, everything is different. It's all synced. It's all synced.

CHAPTER 20 / 49 Discussion

Gut-Brain Connection, Autism and Inflammation

Dr. Wakefield discusses his clinical findings from 25 years ago regarding the link between gastrointestinal inflammation and regressive autism. He claims that treating gut inflammation in autistic children often leads to cognitive and behavioral improvements. The segment also touches on the professional persecution faced by doctors like Peter McCullough who challenge mainstream medical protocols.

gut-brain axis· autism· gastrointestinal disease· inflammation· peter mccullough

1:07:02 that's what we're doing. And so when it starts with a medicalized hospital birth, there's a lot of medications that can disconnect that connection to our baby. And then we have all the pressure from the outside noise after we have our baby on what to do with our baby and I think what a sacred ritual it is a man and woman come together and then a woman creates this new creature. That little and the system knows that that's why it's attacking women because the We really tune into our bodies and what our body is saying to us, it

1:07:40 You have God-given wisdom. You've been given the program. Take care of your child. Yeah, we've been doing it for thousands of years. That's what I say, Dr. Wakefield. God gives us free will, but he also gives us a cheat sheet. Yeah, he gives us choice. And then he gives us, you know, okay, I was showing you how to do this, so with you guys. One thing again about this, the power of what you can learn as a doctor if you are prepared to listen. You are prepared to invest your trust in the story of the patient or the patient's parents. Is there a library? Well I'm not a doctor like you but my dad's, you know, grandpa was a doctor, old country doctor. There was an old thing was listen to the patient. That's what a doctor knew it was working. It was all about them. Yeah. Keep going. But it's just there are libraries of books about childhood developmental disorders and autism

1:08:29 You could take all of those books and you could tear them up and throw them away. There was the teaching when I got into this, and it's my dear boy, it's that kind of elderly statesman attitude of the... of the child psychiatrist, my dear boy. And when you hear anyone saying that, you know what's coming next. It's like you don't know anything at all, you don't know what you're talking about. I'm the expert. Well, you're not the expert actually, because you said that autism starts at birth, that it's genetic, that there's no recovery, there's no regression. Children do not regress from being normal into autism. Diet makes absolutely no difference. There's no gastrointestinal disease on every single aspect. They were completely wrong. The parents were right. Well, you said 25 years ago that now I admit it's all in the gut. Yeah, it starts in the gut. Well, quantify that in just two minutes. What, what, what, and there's a lot of factors. Pesticides, shots, but also what's in the gut? What's happening? Well, what the parents said to us is my child has terrible, intractable gastrointestinal problems, failure to thrive, pain. I know they're in pain.

1:09:31 It's my child, they've lost the ability to speak, but I know they're in pain. And the medical profession, the nurses had said, no, that's just part of autism, put them in a home, forget about it, move on, have another child. That was, what a disgraceful attitude. And when we followed the parents' instructions effectively and we scoped them, we looked at their biopsies under the microscope, the parents were right, the children had inflammation. And when we treated that inflammation like we would treat Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, And not only did the gastrointestinal symptoms get better, but the children woke up. They started using words they hadn't used for maybe five years. Cognitively. And we now know the brain is completely connected to the gut. That's why you say it's in my gut, gut feeling. In my gut feeling.

1:10:16 And we thought at the time, well, we're academics, that didn't happen. So we did it 183 times. It happened virtually every time. Well, I don't want to write myself in the story because it's not about me, but you've gone through quite the giant persecution, thousands of articles, sometimes a month, every TV show, same thing happened to me, didn't do anything they said I did, but the courts are on there. But the funny thing is, with you, I saw it and it gave me faith when I was being persecuted five, six years ago and still am, how it turned. And so what was done to you is being done to Trump, it's been done to me. You were kind of the test pilot for this modern CIA MI6 attack. Yeah, it happened to General Michael Flynn, it happened to... And it's relentless and it doesn't matter. You know what? Because this isn't about me. It's not about me. So you can say anything you like. I don't care. My objective, my professional and moral obligation is to these children. And that's it.

CHAPTER 21 / 49 Discussion

Terry Rossio, Protocol 7 Script and Direction

The script for "Protocol 7" was co-written by Terry Rossio, known for "Shrek" and "Pirates of the Caribbean." Dr. Wakefield describes his directorial approach, which involved educating the cast and crew on the real-world stakes of vaccine injury and the high divorce rates among families with autistic children. The film aims to serve as a repository for industry whistleblowers.

terry rossio· screenwriting· protocol 7· merck· whistleblowers

1:11:11 the objective. Exactly They think attacking us will cut us off the objective. It makes me push for the objective harder. He pushed twice as hard. I'm asking the questions, but you guys were where you want to go here? Uh, me, Andy. There's so much talk about. Amy, talk about the film from an actress's point of view. Oh, I mean, the script is phenomenal. I mean, you wrote that with Terry Rossio, right? Yeah, so the script is fantastic. Can I interrupt you, Terry Rossio? Because people don't know writers. This is a terrible thing. Terry Rossio wrote Shrek, Pirates of the Caribbean, Aladdin, Godzilla vs. King Kong. I didn't know he was. Top of his game. Sorry, Amy. Yeah, no, he's fantastic. And yeah, the script is amazing. And just from an actress point of view, I mean,

1:11:55 And I've worked on other sides of the camera as well, like in production for big movie sets. And I've seen the way movie sets function and work. And not just the amazing cast, the amazing script, but your crew that you hired that first AD. I mean, every day I would get call sheets even when I wasn't even on it and they were always on schedule. you guys were like right on time, which you know for a big film that's really hard to stay on. I was about to say the fact you get a top Hollywood writer to join you shows the system's in trouble. I mean and then the crew's on time and it's focused, it's a mission. It was a machine literally being on that set and it started with like Andy and his energy. You could just tell walking onto some film sets it's you

1:12:41 you know, you can tell if there's tension or you know if other things are going on, but. On Andy set. Everybody was so happy. There was like music being played in between the scenes, but the force was with you. Yeah, but even as a director, he gives really good direction. It's the nature of the movie. You know some of the actors didn't grasp it. I obviously did and I loved it and I loved the part that I got to play. I play one of the scientists at Merck labs that actually. helps with the whistleblowing, but you know there was a scene in the bar and and the conflict really needed to come through and he came up to me and he gave me some really cool direction and we did it again and it just felt better and as an actress I was like

1:13:26 He's he's a really good director. He doesn't just make documentaries like I'm excited to see what other feature films he makes because I love how they never would have persecuted you trying to save these children You would have ever done this. They you're the persecution of you made you do all these other incredible things. You've now done Well, you have to find a way you have to put all the past behind and say how can I use my experience to? Change this and in the clinic you can influence one child's life at a time one Parents beliefs, but you're dealing with billions of people that's out there million your patient that becomes a much more powerful medium

1:14:04 And, yeah, I've really enjoyed it. One thing I did, and I wasn't aware of whether it was done in other films or not, because this was my first feature film, is to get all the cast and crew around before we might shoot a scene. A scene about, for example, the tension between the mother and the father. and point out to them, look, why are we shooting this scene? Why is it important? It's important because the divorce rate amongst families where there is an autistic child is in the order of 70 to 90 percent. Okay, you've got to understand that. This is why this is so important. People are under such intense pressure. Their lives have fallen apart. Why do we do this? Why are we shooting this scene about a gluten casein-free diet?

1:14:50 Why are we doing that? And we're doing it because mothers have reported clinical benefit in their children from going on to this diet. And once I started explaining these things to them, and no one apparently had ever done that before, to the grips and the others. And no one included them ever. Yeah, now they felt really part of it. And that was a fascinating experience. This is the future. Stay there. We'll talk more about this with Dr. Andrew Wakefield straight ahead. This is an incredible interview. See the film, ladies and gentlemen, Protocol 7. Comes out in just a few weeks. thousands of peer reviewed studies all over the news. Bill Gates's main investigation is the gut. They admit it all because they didn't want him up front to expose what they were doing.

CHAPTER 22 / 49 Discussion

Birthing Instincts, California Stillbirth Reporting

A discussion on the "Birthing Instincts" podcast reveals that California Governor Gavin Newsom reportedly signed legislation making it more difficult to report stillbirths. Emmy Robbin advocates for midwifery and natural birthing processes, criticizing the pressure on pregnant women to accept multiple vaccines while being warned against minor dietary risks. The segment emphasizes the importance of colostrum and breastfeeding as "nature's vaccine."

stillbirth· california· birthing instincts· stuart fishbein· midwifery

1:15:52 We got the new film. I haven't seen it yet. I'm gonna be at the premiere. I'll see it then you guys will say you'll come back in studio for that. I know you very well used to live in Austin after you left England. We've got like, you know, 25 minutes of live air left wherever you want to go, whatever you want to talk about with the film. But I also want to talk about as a doctor and you know, also as a doula what you're seeing the news coming out about the insurance companies, the 20 plus million dead, the intensification, trying to claim it's long COVID, but the statistics show it's the quote vaccinated. And we talk about vaccine, they've changed the definition from what it used to be. Yeah, I saw one of the most extraordinary things is the insurance companies were among the first to notice this, that there was an excess death in young people who would never die. That's where they get their revenue from. Suddenly they were on the hook for

1:16:42 millions and millions of dollars. In Switzerland, the life assurance companies actually started to label death from the vaccine as suicide. You took this experimental product, therefore it's suicide. I don't know whether that still pertains, but talk about getting to doing saying anything to wriggle out of a very very uncomfortable position but you know it is a an existential threat to people because not only does it kill people but it adversely affects fertility as well and we're already seeing

1:17:20 a massive decline in fertility globally, particularly in Western populations. I saw a paper the other day on sperm counts, sperm motility dropping dramatically over the last three or four decades. And all of this is cumulative. It's environmental toxicity of some form, which we don't know what it is specifically. But when you add this into the mix, man really does. Man is, we've had five Major extinction events in the history of this the geological history of this planet. The last one was a what the Jurassic late You know after when all the comet soars went and then that's right in the Yucatan Peninsula And now we are on an extinction curve again, and we've really got to take this very very seriously That's what Elon Musk talks about. What do you think? I am I'll be long. I you know, he's a very interesting character I don't know enough about him. I've been so busy with this film, but I do follow him on his own

1:18:14 his own social media platform, X, and he gave voice to people who had been denied a voice, people like Bobby Kennedy and others. people. Exactly, I can't find fault with that. No, he brought back, he fought for the first amendment and he brought back controversial figures onto that who'd been thrown off by the Biden government in many cases, putting pressure on the social media platforms not to put out a message which was averse to their own interests. And so talk about election interference, talk about an abuse of the first

1:18:50 I mean, I think it's a great deal of respect for the man. I agree. You can't look a gift horse in the mouth. I mean, yeah, I mean, well, I mean, if I could just talk about what I see and what I witness as a doula childbirth educator, I mean, you got the war. Well, I was just gonna say they tell pregnant women, you know, don't eat nitrates. Don't eat lunch meat. But yet you know, you can't. Take six vaccines while you're pregnant. You know the T dap the flu and now Covid and it's just interesting how the irony you can tell somebody not to eat raw cheese or not to eat lunch meat, but you can tell them. To inject themselves with heavy metals and you know an experimental vaccine that you don't there are no studies and

1:19:45 Doesn't have an immune system. Yeah, and that was then now we have the studies. It's devastating. Yeah miscarriages. What do you say? What are you hearing? I mean I was telling Andy on the way here I was listening to a really amazing podcast with an OB and a midwife that have this awesome podcast and the midwife was talking about the name of the podcast It's called birthing instincts. I love it so much. Dr. Stuart Fishbein is a incredible. You should actually have him on your show. He is so awesome. But they were talking about how Newsom actually made it to where stillbirths aren't allowed to be reported anymore in California. And I just, I find that... Oh yeah, they're covering their statistics up. Yeah. I'm like, that's crazy. Yeah. Well keep going. So what are you hearing as a dealer? What are you seeing?

CHAPTER 23 / 49 Discussion

Antibiotic Resistance, Viral Evolution Dynamics

The overuse of antibiotics has led to a "post-antibiotic apocalypse" characterized by multi-resistant organisms. Dr. Wakefield uses this as an analogy for COVID-19 vaccines, arguing that "leaky" vaccines drive the emergence of dominant, resistant viral strains. He criticizes public health measures like six-foot social distancing as unscientific and ineffective against the natural behavior of pathogens.

antibiotics· superbugs· viral variants· social distancing· public health

1:23:09 It is. What we've got to do is trust nature. Nature has been a gradual, slow... deliberate process. Things that don't work get cut out. Things that do work get kept. And ultimately what you've got is an extraordinary being that is capable of so much until medicine... That's billions of years of development. Absolutely. And then medicine interferes within a few decades. I'll give you an example and that is antibiotics. Now when antibiotics first came in, about a hundred years ago, They were a miracle. And they were a miracle at a time when you had battlefield gangrene and neurosyphilis and all kinds of infections, scarlet fever, with... And these were fatal diseases that antibiotics saved many lives. But it's not a static situation, it's dynamic.

1:23:59 Now, 100 years later, the public health authorities describe it as the post-antibiotic apocalypse. In other words, what we did is we gave something which killed bugs but did so imperfectly, and those that survived became resistant. And so we pushed a new antibiotic on and the 5% of those survived and that became resistant. You had multi-resistant organisms, highly pathogenic, that you couldn't get rid of. They would cause hospital infections where you'd have to shut down the floor, the operating theater, the hospital itself because you could not eradicate this infection with any antibiotic. And what the drug companies did is to say

1:24:37 You know what, we're going to get out of antibiotic development because the bacteria are resistant before we even come to market. Well that's just like with pesticides. They know whether it's whatever the pest is, three, four, five generations a minority is immune and then within ten generations they're all immune. And this is the natural process. And what happened, this happened with COVID, let me give you a really silly example. They made us undergo six feet of distancing. Why? Because the COVID, the bacteria... Psychological. Six feet. And if we were five feet, 11 inches, and we were safe, it was six feet. This is the mentality. But bacteria don't work like that. Some can jump eight feet. Some can jump two feet.

1:25:28 So if you social distance at six feet, the ones that can jump eight feet take over as the dominant species. That's ridiculous. But it's a good analogy. Viruses don't jump. It's not true. If you start to introduce a vaccine that is sick, a vaccine, a shot that is somehow successful against a certain strain, then viruses are a swarm of strains. They're not one strain and there will emerge a dominant strain. Oh, so the drug companies, now we need to introduce a new one. Which creates another elite out of us. A new one, a new one. It's just job creation. We've got to mark it forever. And that's what happened. And so we have these multi-resistant variants of the original COVID strains

1:26:13 that are capable of eluding the immunity produced, if any, by the vaccine or by the shot. And it gets us into terrible, terrible trouble. That's why I tell the establishment, go with God's natural plan. That's the ancient pure plan. It'll have some bumps, but it'll be way better than you. They think one dimensionally. I do this, I change this. They never think about the second, third, fourth, fifth order change. And I think none of this is to say don't develop these things and don't think about them and don't act in the best interest of the public by trying to produce things that will ameliorate. But be careful. Do it in the certain knowledge that these bugs are far smarter than you and they will ultimately win. You will not eradicate them. So how do you control them in a way that is safe and effective?

CHAPTER 24 / 49 Discussion

Gavi Global Alliance, Vaccine Safety Monitoring

An author who attended Gavi (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization) meetings claims that vaccine safety was never discussed during the planning of third-world immunization programs. A study in Africa reportedly showed that the DPT vaccine was associated with a six-fold increase in mortality among girls, but the research was suppressed. The segment argues that global health organizations prioritize distribution over safety monitoring.

gavi· bill gates· world health organization· dpt vaccine· africa

1:26:58 the media. Wow, which is not what they're doing. They just say, Forget it. Forget all the bad stuff happening. Absolutely So what do you both predicts going to happen? Now? There's a total crash of public confidence. People know the social contracts broken and they're just doubling down. That does not sound like it's going to go well. Well, from my perspective, we're going to go on making movies that tell these stories and what repository for whistleblowers from the industry, from the vaccine industry and from public health who've come and said we've done a terrible thing. Here's the evidence and those stories will be told. Emmy, what about you? I'm somebody who believes that the good and the truth always wins and always prevails. So as much as they push back and try to silence people or try to scare people, those of us that live life with no fear and aren't afraid

1:27:55 The truth and the light will prevail always. I truly believe that. I mean, I agree because there's so much good medicine and so many good doctors and nurses and scientists. I see big pharma corporations taking it over. It's very discrediting and one of the best things we've got. Yeah, you know, I recently had, I sat on a a panel with Paul Merrick, who was an eminent physician from Pittsburgh, used to run the intensive care unit on the liver transplant program, which was the preeminent liver transplant program in the world. He said, you know, last year if I'd sat here with you I'd say you were insane. He said this year I know you're not. That was interesting and then someone like Peter McCullough comes along, 700 plus publications and he has been helping me with some health problems and he is just an outstanding doctor because what does he do? He listens, he examines the patients. How old-fashioned, how quaint.

1:28:53 Fancy that he doesn't do telemedicine like you know he actually sits you down. He's what works absolutely and he He's the man who actually other people quote his papers and sometimes they don't quote them correctly He's the man who wrote the papers he did the science so he knows so it's been a blessing having Peter McCullough in my life I want to ask you about this because Bill Gates Like you said, instinctively, I'm on a woman that has that incredible sixth sense, but I got one. For a man, I got a strong one. I am reviled by Bill Gates. Even when I was young, I would see him. I would think, that's a dangerous person. Like you're at a gas station pumping gas, she thugs the way they're acting. You know those are dangerous guys. The Klaus Schwabs, the Bill Gateses of the world, the globalists who are so reviled and hated now, do they have any idea how much trouble they're in? Because they just keep doubling down.

1:29:41 You know I asked this question once of an author who used to sit on the meetings of Gavi. He used to sit in all their meetings and he wrote two books that came out of it. People don't know what Gavi is, real quick. The Global Alliance of Vaccine vaccination and immunization. That's the big pharma front group. Absolutely. And I said to him in an interview, in all of these meetings upon which you base the two books that you've written, you're talking about giving all of these vaccines to the third world. Was safety ever discussed once? He said, not once. Not once. That's what the UN said before COVID in 2019. They said, we're just giving this by big pharma. We're told to do it. Yeah. And this happened a

1:30:27 did a study in Africa, Peter Arby did it, a friend of mine, and he is on the side of vaccination. He did this study and he showed that the the whole-shell pertussis vaccine of the DPT vaccine was killing girls of an excess mortality of six or seven fold. And when, what happened? Did the World Health Organization follow that up? Did they do further studies? No. What I think happened was they took away his research funding so he couldn't do it anymore. That is not the attitude and so when you do that, when you bury these, you bury them for future generations unfortunately to reap the terrible reward of that because you've moved on and the damage comes later. Good level. Well I was gonna say something we haven't really touched on is that the film

CHAPTER 25 / 49 Discussion

Real-Time Litigation, Pfizer Document Secrecy

"Protocol 7" is described as unique because it is being released while the underlying litigation is still active. The discussion contrasts this with Pfizer's attempt to seal its COVID-19 vaccine trial documents for 75 years. A former head of the Texas Health Department reportedly admitted to the host that vaccines cause problems but claimed the "good" outweighed the harm.

pfizer· fda· litigation· roundup· transparency

1:31:22 Andy was saying in the green room with me, this is like the first time a film is actually being made while the trial is still going on and that they're releasing papers on all of this and it's gonna actually be on the website. That's right. For people to do their own research. I mean, it's quite right. All films of this genre, Alex, as you know, whether it's Silent Spring or The Insider or Erin Brockovich, then the court case plays out, the book gets written, the movie gets made. This film is unique in as much that it is coming out, it's being released right in the heart, right in the heat of the litigation. Wow. So, there's a movie on Roundup that has George Clooney too. That's the same. That came out, that was in the middle of litigation. What was that? No, no, it came out after. Right. Okay, yeah. What was it called?

1:32:13 Michael Clayton. Okay. That's good to bring. That's what you're saying. This is like literally exposing a real-time thing. Let's have it. What happens is that the documents come out because they've been sealed. And the movie's been made. And you plan your release and you think, are these thousands of documents going to show that we got it all completely wrong? Are they going to sue us for defamation? No, they're not. Oh, in fact, quite the opposite. You've been validated. What do you make of Pfizer wanting to seal their documents for 75 years? Oh, yeah. I mean, is there something there by chance that they don't want us to see? Talk about stress to science. Science is all about visibility, transparency. Transparency, absolutely. And when you do try and hide it, we know now. We know. Come on, we're not stupid. We know you've got something to hide. Well, anytime I hear safe and effective now, I'm like, nope.

1:33:00 I always use the bear example. And we have a crew member here that's been a hemophiliac and had some people he knew very close to hurt by it. But they came out bear in the minute said, yeah, we know this is going to kill hemophiliacs. We're putting HIV in it and hepatitis. We don't care. Screw them. Their life isn't worth anything. They had a bioethics thing. I mean, how would you sit there as a bear executive and just say screw millions of people? Yeah, they said this. You know, the regulatory authorities, the FDA said this way back. No, it said no matter what the merits of the science, if it calls into question vaccine safety, it can't take place. Okay, that's effectively what they said. It doesn't matter what the merits of the science are, good or bad,

1:33:45 Even if it's really good, even if it's convincing, we cannot call into question vaccine safety. Because we know better than the public. We will usurp the public's right to choose and we will determine what they have access to in terms of science and information, and anything that says vaccines are bad. So they're playing God. Absolutely. I think I told you this story like 10 years ago. You probably don't remember, but I remember telling you it in the old studio. But I used to hike a lot and be in a lot better shape. And I'm only on a 10-mile hike. I'm coming down. And this distinguished-looking fellow comes over with a beard and stuff. And Google was already out. So he told me his name. I got in my car and had my phone and looked at his name up. He was the head of the Texas Health Department.

1:34:28 We had like a three minute conversation, because I'm trying to drink water, I've just hiked up a hill, I'm about to get in my car and he goes, listen Alex, you're right about the vaccines, they do cause a lot of problems, but we've done the numbers. The harm that's done is outweighed by the good. And I said, funny, I've seen the statistics, I don't think that's right. And we had a little bit of an argument, and I went with the head of the Texas Health Department, but he told me that to my face. Right. And the tragedy is, of course, if you don't monitor, if you don't capture the harm, And autism is a classic case of this. You don't capture the harm, then you never ascribe the vaccine injury. Because you're never looking for it. You just don't do that. What do you think, 1 out of 100 get reported or something? Yeah, it's just 1% get reported to the system. Let me show TV viewers something real quick because I didn't get to all these. This is the World Economic Forum.

CHAPTER 26 / 49 Discussion

Pfizer Staff Vaccines, Australian Import Discrepancy

Reports from Australia suggest that Pfizer imported a specific batch of vaccines exclusively for its own staff, separate from the supply provided to the general public. This has led to speculation about "range testing" or the use of saline batches to manage visible side effects during the rollout. The segment concludes with a call to support independent media and the upcoming premiere of "Protocol 7" in Austin.

pfizer· australia· employee vaccines· saline· clinical trials

1:35:15 the president of the United States, the president of the United States, CEOs, Deputy heads the W H O all here. So yeah, there's record deaths. It's long covered, but look at the numbers. It's people shot that are the majority of it. We've got all this coming out, but I haven't shown this yet because I've been behind the last few days. We have a major Fizer whistleblower that sent us a bunch of documents. Here's a first look at him and just some of the documents are what they denied later that they said. Don't And then I didn't just play the whistleblower, I pulled up documents where they admitted it, but then they spun it later. So what can you say? Because I saw it in London Guardian article like 15 years ago, oh don't worry, world leaders get clean vaccines. What can you say about that? They did this in Australia. What happened is it emerged that Pfizer imported an entirely different vaccine to give to their staff.

1:36:03 in Australia, whereas the populace could have that one, the dirty one, the one that was causing problems potentially, but the Pfizer stuff, I don't know whether that story's been followed up, but that really- I remember that. So how powerful evidence is that they won't take their own brew? It's like we need a tester, like a King's would have somebody test their food. If the tester would need it, the King's like, you're trying to poison me. That's right, or the tester drops dead and said, thank you very much for doing that. So how powerful is that? I mean, to me, I feel like, you know, there was in my personal opinion, I feel like there was batches that were saline, some that were the real, because if I feel like if they put out the real thing all around, there would just be way too many. We've seen some real evidence of that. Yeah. I mean, I just feel like side effects just in general would have been out the roof. So yeah. Range testing? Like, I wonder how they, I don't know. I don't know. I didn't get it. So I don't know.

1:37:01 I don't want to say anything. I had one family member out of like 10 people that are close to me, tag it and they they they apologize. They have unbelievable health problems now. Oh, there's actors. I know that got the vaccine just that they could audition, not even landing apart and getting the vaccine to be on set, but just to audition. And I was like, Wait, you're you're really going to get vaccinated just so that you can well, Ice Cube was going to do it until a bunch of his friends got sick. It's so sad that people were pushed into this position, particularly the military, the first responders, people you really need to be as healthy as a horse, to force them into losing their job, their income.

1:37:43 to take the vaccine. Absolutely disgraceful. And of course, these people are now winning the legal cases. Many of them are winning because of the damage that's been done. And that's well, promise me, because I'll be at the premiere in Austin and promise me you guys will come back for commercial free like hour and a half to really do deep dive after I've seen the film. We will do that. OK, so when's it come out? That's it. Protocol seven. We'll put it on screen. Protocol seven dot movie. May 31st. And then you're going to be here in Austin. When's the Austin premiere? The Austin premiere is on the 7th of June. The LA premiere is the week after the Friday. You just book in. two hours to come in here before or after that, preferably after. So book an extra day and we're gonna do a two hour live show or we'll do a tape show, whatever it is. All right, well it is good to see Emmy Robbin back again. I love you and Leah McAdoo, what amazing women. And Dr. Andy J. Wakefield, Protocol 7, just protocol the word, number 7.movie. We got 30 seconds left, closing comments.

1:38:45 Go see this film. It's very eye opening, especially if you are planning to have Children or have Children. It's an Emmy isn't just a beautiful mother. She was a wonderful actor as well. So thank you. We'll have you back on set anytime I've seen the trailer. It looks better than major Hollywood movies. I mean, it was like, Wow, congratulations. Thank you. All right, we're going to have a First Amendment discussion with Nick Foyntess coming up. We're going to air a special report ahead of that, and we're going to let these great folks get on to their next work. But I feel really strong knowing there's great people like Dr. Andrew Wakefield and others out there fighting the tyranny. We're going to air this special report.

CHAPTER 27 / 49 Discussion

ICC Arrest Warrants, Israeli Self-Defense Rights

The International Criminal Court in The Hague is considering arrest warrants for senior Israeli officials for alleged war crimes. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called on world leaders to oppose the ICC's move, labeling it an assault on Israel's right to self-defense. Simultaneously, the Biden administration launched a national strategy to counter anti-semitism, which critics link to new domestic speech restrictions.

international criminal court· the hague· benjamin netanyahu· war crimes· anti-semitism

1:39:23 on the anti-Semitism bills of the new world treasure horse and the Nick Foy test straight ahead. Thank you so much, Dr. Andy Wakefield and Emmy Robin and emmyrobindola.com. We'll be right back. Stay with us. The international criminal court in the Hague is contemplating issuing arrest warrants against senior Israeli government and military officials as war criminals. Israel expects the leaders of the free world to stand firmly against the ICC's outrageous assault on Israel's inherent right of self-defense. We expect them to use all the means at their disposal to stop this dangerous move. My administration, with our second gentleman's leadership, has launched our nation's first national security strategy to counter anti-Semitism. It's mobilizing the full force of the federal government

1:40:16 to protect Jewish community. And we must all of us together call out any anti-Semitism in all of its forms without equivocation and without delay. This is our moment. The U.S. House passed a bill 32291, and a group of representatives say they want to protect their Jewish constituents. And the bill would essentially make it easier for the Department of Education to enforce anti-discrimination laws at public institutions. So this bill would require the Department of Education to use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of anti-Semitism. Many of the Republicans and Democrats said adding this type of regulation infringes on free speech. Criminal behavior is criminal behavior. Violating people's civil rights is violating people's civil rights. But when we want to insert the government into what you're thinking and what motivates you, you are empowering that which should never be empowered.

1:41:16 the ability of the government to police thought. If implemented, the White House says they will, over the Department of Education. It puts a foreign, multinational NGO with the UN out of Israel and Europe in control of the policy and says not only their current definitions, but when they change it, that will be law. So it's saying it's like a blank check veto to control legislation. It's like a new Congress over speech, and overall the educational systems of primary school and secondary. It's staggering. So I've read the bill twice. So they get into the act and why they're doing it, the definition of it in federal law, and then how they apply federal law is according to this new definition of anti-Semitism in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. They go on here to give power to this group, a foreign group,

1:42:10 to then define and direct federal agencies and the Department of Education, FBI against anyone that does what they say is anti-Semitic. And they give a big laundry list of the current definition. And they say they can also change it whenever they want. So it's an open check legislation just like the CIA got in 47 to do whatever they want. Said that this is one of the worst pieces of legislation we've ever seen. I wasn't exaggerating. Now, there's another example on the list that's gotten some attention, that it's anti-Semitic to claim that Jews killed Jesus. That's what the IHRA says. But that is not a claim invented by anti-Semites. That's in the gospel. According to every gospel account of Christ's passion, the Romans carried out the execution of Jesus at the insistence and behest of the Jewish authorities that handed him over to be killed.

1:42:56 and the mob that called for his death. It may be true that some actual anti-Semites, as in those who hate Jews, have used these biblical passages as a justification for their hatred. That does not make the passages themselves false or evil or anti-Semitic, and it certainly doesn't give Congress the right to tell Christians that they cannot believe or repeat what is in those passages. So get this Joe, as in the United States of America, If you criticize Israel, the state police come to arrest you and your family. It goes on to explain the national security strategies of the president, the last two, which is anyone conservative or doesn't hate white people is anti-Semitic or a white supremacist who can be put in prison, basically. Criticizing policies of government is equated with anti-Semitism. And that, I think, is a far right, comes from the far right,

1:43:55 It comes from the authoritarian leanings where they don't want students on these campuses to voice their opinions because they want to change the narrative going forward. on all of us in live time by AI, and all the federal agencies are in everything with AI, just tracking everything in live time, and your car's got kill switches in it and geofencing controls, and they just killed 22 million people with poison shots. But we're gonna sit here with the media focused on Israel and Palestine all day to have a big uproar and a big uprising, that a cop's gonna shoot a black man, and then everything's gonna burn down when Trump gets elected. I mean, you just, you know, we just sit here and we watch it.

CHAPTER 28 / 49 Discussion

Nick Fuentes, Return to X and Free Speech

Nick Fuentes returns to the program following his reinstatement on X (formerly Twitter) by Elon Musk. Fuentes discusses the "hero's journey" of surviving a multi-year censorship regime that saw him banned from nearly all major social media platforms. He credits Musk and Rumble CEO Chris Pavlovsky for establishing a "free speech beachhead" that allows for a new populist awakening.

nick fuentes· elon musk· x· free speech· censorship

1:44:39 Nick J. Fuentes is our guest for the next two hours and I appreciate him coming on. there. He was going to be in studio. We had an emergency come up, which I totally get. My wife's dad died last night. I barely made it the show. We're there at the hospital. He died last night, like seven o'clock. Not complaining. He's gone on to the next level passed over the other side, but I'm still here today. This morning calls me like five a.m. already up. I can't come. I got an emergency. I totally understand. We're gonna do a huge spaces with the Mario to fall tonight. We're gonna cancel that because he's got stuff major stuff. He's got to deal with it. I understand that. All right. I don't want to have a tit for tat thing like we had a year and a half ago when Kanye West was here. I didn't know that was going to happen. I want to have a real discussion about issues in the whole world. And now here we are with

1:45:29 the richest man in the world on paper, Elon Musk, a true maverick by any yardstick. You can say, oh, he didn't really do those giant rockets at half the cost of NASA. He didn't really, yeah, he did all that. And now he's brought free speech back to a great extent to X compared to other platforms. He said, hey, I'm putting Nick J. Fuentes back on. That's exploded from the top trends last four days. I did a spaces with him that reached millions and millions of people a few days ago. And so here we are. But I was impressed, and I'll be completely honest about this. I was very impressed. And it was my daughter's seventh birthday, so I could only do an hour. I had to leave. People thought, oh, you're mad at Nick. You left in an hour. No, I can only do an hour. Very great points Nick made. Excellent points that Nick Sordor made, that Mario Nafal made, that the guest made. I kind of want to repeat that and just cover a bunch of other big issues here instead of debating

1:46:21 the third Reich and things like that, and I'm happy to go there. There's been no pre-interview here. There's been no, I said, if you got any questions or things you want to cover, you know, send them to me. So that's where we are. But the Nick Fuentes I liked, and I'm not putting Nick down, was the guy I knew five years ago that exploded from nowhere and was America first and things I agree with and is really doing great talk shows as a very young man, knowing he would mature even better and better. And then when the Ye interview happened, I said, cover whatever you want. They go, oh, don't worry. It wasn't Nick. It was other folks with him. Oh, he wants to come in and apologize for what he said. I said, well, I don't even want that. I just want to cover all the other issues. We can spend some of the time on the stuff he wants to cover. But I have some questions. None of that happened. It was mainly press on the nerve of who's the most hardcore, who's the most real, who's the most wild.

1:47:09 And we can do that today, but I really don't wanna do it. I wanna talk about transhumanism, globalism, the open borders, the depopulation, the future of the world, censorship, ministers in Europe being arrested for free speech, what Trudeau is pushing. To me, all of that is pertinent because I want a big tent to get everybody to agree on, we agree on free speech and private property and God and basic liberties. But that said, Nick Fuentes, I appreciate you coming on. And I want to give you the floor because I have no idea where you're going to go. For the next 10 minutes, you've got the floor here to talk about this experience, what it's like. I've been through the same stuff you've been through. A few people have. It's quite the elite club, quite the painful club. And then you're welcome to go wherever you want. I've got a lot of questions and angles I don't

1:47:59 I mean, I watch your show maybe once a week when I can. I watch the clips every day. And so maybe I always get accused of not covering something and I actually have covered it. People just didn't see me cover it. So I've got a lot of stuff that I actually am intrigued that you're a smart guy. I want to hear your view on things and you can ask me questions as well. So Nick Fuentes, people can find you now at NickJFuentes on X, nicolasjfuentes.com. You do your own daily show. Thanks for being here, Nick. Hi, Alex. Thank you for having me. It's great to be with you. And it's been great to be back on X. As you said, we did a space this weekend. It's already at, I think, 2 million plus views. And just talking about the censorship regime and what you and I have both been put through, we've had a very similar experience of kind of the hero's journey. We were sent to hell in the land of censorship, banned from everything.

CHAPTER 29 / 49 Discussion

Social Media Singularity, 2016 Trump Revolution

The period between 2013 and 2016 is described as a technological singularity where smartphones and social media enabled the Trump revolution. Following the 2016 election, a massive crackdown led by Google, YouTube, and Facebook utilized AI and groups like the ADL to prevent future populist realignments. Fuentes argues that the banning of Donald Trump in 2021 was the catalyst for the current free speech movement.

smartphones· social media· donald trump· 2016 election· adl

1:48:53 And it's been pretty incredible in just the last three years, there's been this free speech beachhead established on the internet by Rumble and now by Elon Musk with his acquisition of Twitter. So we both made it out of the underworld, you first and then me a little bit later. And to kind of recap some of the things that we talked about this weekend, I think the broad agreement that we have, although I know we don't agree on everything, is that the number one central issue is free speech on the internet. And like you said, we diverged at some point along the way, but I think you and I have always agreed that you cannot have a right wing, you cannot have a pro-freedom, pro-human, pro-American movement if we don't have access to the platforms. And I think something that people don't realize is how tenuous that is.

1:49:44 This is there was a very short window of time at the beginning of the last decade. I would say roughly between 2013 to 2016 when social media really became activated. This, I would say, is a specific singularity in the history of technological development when people had all gotten smartphones and social media. It's the hottest medium that has ever existed in the history of mankind for the first time, unlike even before, when people had Internet and computers. For the first time, roughly in that period, in the middle of the last decade,

1:50:20 Everybody was connected to everybody else on social media at all times via their smartphone. And I think that that created a very specific political outcome, which was the Trump revolution. It is no surprise that when, for the first time in history, the consciousness was elevated to such a high degree by social media and smartphones, it produced a wild populist nationalist revolution. Consequently, people started to realize that you had been right all along about so much of what you had said. People started to realize that what we had been told about 9-11 or the Iraq war

1:50:58 So many other tragic incidents had been used to program us and condition us to accept, I think, certain political narratives and agendas. And I think that is what produced the revolution we saw in 16, truly a political realignment and revolution. What happened after that was the largest crackdown on social media in history. Google, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, the rest all undertook a censorship regime using artificial intelligence, using activist groups like ADL and SPLC. And in their own words, the stated intention was to make it so that something like the Trump election, a true populist realignment, can never happen again. Patriots can never talk to each other, do citizen journalism, talk about things outside the mainstream.

1:51:47 And I think that they were nearly successful. By 2020 and 2021, the process had effectively been completed. People like you and I and everyone in the middle had all been censored. Everyone that had not been censored was chilled. There was a chilling effect. And so those that were in outright banned, I think, began to self-censor because they didn't want to be banned on the social media platforms. I think it was the banning of Donald Trump after January 6, 2021, when this trend started to reverse. I think Trump was too big to ban. And when they banned him several days after January 6, that is when these other players got into the equation.

CHAPTER 30 / 49 Discussion

Elon Musk, Financial Risks for Free Speech

Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter is framed as a civic mission rather than a financial one, as reinstating controversial figures like Fuentes and Alex Jones invites advertiser boycotts. Fuentes warns that the current free speech environment is tenuous and depends heavily on the survival of X and Rumble. He suggests that 2024 represents a final opportunity to secure a legal remedy for Big Tech censorship.

elon musk· x· rumble· chris pavlovsky· advertisers

1:52:27 I'm talking specifically about Chris Pavlovsky with Rumble introducing live streaming about a year after Elon Musk stated his intention to acquire Twitter or at least to transform it into a free speech platform. And in just the past three years, people cannot take it for granted. In just the last three years, we have kind of resumed this hot social media period, this free and open internet period that we had for a very short window at the beginning of the last decade. Consequently, just like in the last decade, which produced Donald Trump, I think this is producing a very similar and proportionate mass awakening. And I think that's why Donald Trump has been polling so well in every swing state, why he's been polling well nationally. I think that's why people, even you look at a lot of celebrities, are coming around to a more right-wing position.

1:53:20 So, your reinstatement on Twitter, my reinstatement on Twitter, it shows that Elon Musk has a true commitment to free speech because I think from a financial standpoint, he gains nothing by bringing us back on. You know and I know the ADL doesn't like either of us. They have used us to blackmail him with the advertisers to try to bankrupt his company. and to make the debt bad, which he used to buy Twitter. So I think he gains nothing from it financially, but this is about upholding free speech. This is the civic function. I think there's a very real political function of having free speech. And I think he's committed to the principle

1:53:57 I think that's been more demonstrated than anything by him bringing me back. Because I think, as you said, some of the things I've said are even a little bit more wild than maybe things you've said. So it's truly been a remarkable weekend. I think I'm very optimistic. Although I will say my final message to kind of wrap this up. I would say I'm cautiously optimistic. And people need to recognize that, as I said at the beginning of this, we are in an extremely tenuous position. We have X, we have Rumble. That's it. YouTube, Twitch, Instagram, Facebook have not changed. There is just as much censorship on those platforms as there always has been. You and I remain... Yeah, go ahead.

1:54:42 Or more, absolutely. And so it's really just in these two places where we're able to have a platform. So that's why we have to rally behind Musk and Chris Pavlovsky at Rumble as much as possible. Because the second that they turn those off, We're right back in the dark winter of 2021 with Joe Biden, and we're going to pick up where we left off with all that tyranny. So people need to recognize that now is the time for people to rally. I think we really have one more shot here in 2024 to get Trump in, and maybe there's a legal remedy for big tech censorship. I agree with everything you said except one point. You said this is as big as 2026. I think it's five times bigger.

CHAPTER 31 / 49 Discussion

Deep State False Flags, Anti-Semitism Awareness Act

There are concerns that the "deep state" will orchestrate a "black swan" event or false flag to justify a total crackdown on free speech before the 2024 election. The recent Anti-Semitism Awareness Act is viewed as a tool to expand the definition of hate speech and silence dissent on college campuses. Fuentes argues that both political parties are compliant in this "totalitarian" takeover of the First Amendment.

false flag· white supremacy· anti-semitism awareness act· campus protests· deep state

1:55:24 than 2016. So I think this is way bigger than 2016. The awakening is explosive. I see it on the street. I don't make it about myself, but that's the gauge I have. I go to a grocery store, instead of shaking 20 hands, I get mobbed. I go to the gym, I get mobbed. All we get is positive. I don't really get any negative anymore. That to me is indicative of this. And when you talk about you know, all we have is basically X and, you know, rumble. And then Joe Rogan kind of has his own outpost and then Tucker has his own. But for some of the social media, you're absolutely right. And the establishment knows they're losing on every front. And my concern is my next question to you is what do you think the deep state is going to do with 180 days to the election to try to demonize their opposition? We've seen the pre-programming that white supremacists

1:56:18 are going to blow everything up and kill everybody with no evidence of it. I see false flags. I'm really concerned about what this desperate deep state is going to do as the whole world wakes up to him. What do you think? I think you're absolutely right. I think that's the oldest playbook. That's the one that they always go to. It's the exact same thing that they did in 2018 with the Christchurch shooting or any number of the other mass shootings or terrorist incidents. Every escalation in censorship in the past six or seven years was always precipitated or preceded by some sort of mass shooting, some sort of violent extremist episode, which if you really look back and interrogate the actual timeline of events with any of those, whether it was El Paso or Christchurch or any of them,

1:57:07 There was always things suspicious, like there was never a federal agent very far behind, never a confidential informant very far behind. In a lot of them, it was the closest circle, like the five people that knew the shooter, one of them was a confidential informant. So I think you're absolutely right. They, just like we, understand the stakes, which is that with Twitter, with Rumble, with big tech now once again back at our fingertips, we really actually have a fighting chance at political reform in the form of Trump. We really stand a chance at defeating the legal political persecution of Trump. and him being an avatar and a representative of all of us. And so I think, as you say, they recognize the stakes just as much as we do. And I think there will be some sort of

1:57:51 extremely unpredictable black swan type event. And you look at the way that they're seeding that idea on television all the time, you're right, it is gonna be some kind of false flag, it is gonna be some kind of violent extremism to vilify the right wing and more than that, to justify a clamp down on free speech. And I saw a clip from your show this week, you've already been talking about this and hitting this all the time. It's this latest bill that they're passing in Congress. They're now using the campus protests, which are now spreading from coast to coast. Whatever you think about the protests themselves, I think we both agree this new bill that has been introduced is a totalitarian anti-free speech takeover. They introduced the bill and they say now they're going to expand the definition of hate speech, specifically anti-Semitism, so that particular people can launch Title VI

1:58:45 civil rights claims against the schools. And this is just the beginning. This is always how it starts. And I think you actually hit the note exactly right. Maybe it was a week, two weeks ago, you said that they're mobilizing the left on the campuses and increasingly even in the city streets. They're mobilizing the right to meet them on the campus and in the city streets as well. And this is creating the perfect condition, the perfect powder keg for a kind of one of these incidents where a bullet's gonna go, there's gonna be some kind of violent episode, you know that's always how it starts. And just like now, how they're using the Columbia protest and UCLA and everywhere else, they're using that to justify.

1:59:27 this anti-Semitism Awareness Act, they may use some kind of future violent confrontation, some kind of violent episode at one of these demonstrations to justify even further crackdowns. And I think the most important point is that Twitter is in an extremely tenuous position. I don't think people realize that. It was very difficult for Elon Musk to keep the lights on over there at Twitter with the kind of pressure that the ADL was bringing on their advertisers and which comes in many forms, not just even from the advertisers. So it wouldn't take much for Congress to go in and pass a law. And you know as well as anybody that Republicans will be just as compliant in that as the Democrats.

CHAPTER 32 / 49 Discussion

Javier Milei, Argentina Lithium and X

The election of Javier Milei in Argentina is linked to the influence of X and Elon Musk's interest in the country's massive lithium reserves. Milei's decision to cancel Argentina's accession to the BRICS alliance realigns the nation with the United States and secures critical resources for electric vehicle batteries. This geopolitical shift is presented as a potential opportunistic motive behind Musk's purchase of the social media platform.

javier milei· argentina· lithium· brics· elon musk

2:00:10 Republicans and Democrats obediently both bipartisanly supported this new bill that expands the definition of hate speech. Republicans are... Yeah, go ahead. And Nick, I want to go through that bill with you. because there's absolutely no doubt that's happening. But you mentioned, I mentioned false flags, you talked about it. The Governor Whitmer kidnapping plot, two trials where they were innocent, another third trial they finally got some people convicted. About of 24 people, like what was it, 20 were FBI agents setting this up. So I think that's really going to be the model here. And that's where I've been. I'm not supporting Israel's carpet bombing. I also don't support Biden giving money to Hamas. And then the left funding, as you can see, they're trying to create this clash of civilizations that we're now witnessing. And I want to derail that.

2:01:01 and Trump's imperfect, but way better than Biden, obviously, and get him into office. So pulling back from this, we can say, is Elon Musk for real or is he an opportunist? I tend to think he's for real overall. He's got a bunch of kids. He's not perfect. But he sees also that the wind's blowing in our direction. So it's not that he's an opportunist. He's already on our side, but now he thinks the time is ripe to take these people on. He's doubled the engagement. on ex formerly Twitter. It's winning. The people are awakening. I mean, we're really at that magic moment right now. That's what people got to be so concerned about what the deep state is going to do next. That's why we're trying to get everybody as focused as possible on that.

2:01:44 Absolutely. And it is, I think, an interesting question whether Elon Musk is an opportunist or if he's some kind of ideologue. Ultimately, though, that we have the free speech platform, at least in the short term, is really the only thing that matters. I could see that there might be some explanations for how this could be a good opportunity for Elon Musk. And I'll elaborate on one in particular. I thought it was very interesting the role that Twitter or X played in the recent Argentine election. As you know, Javier Mele was recently elected just last fall in Argentina. And it was before Javier Mele was elected that Argentina was going to accede to the BRICS alliance, the Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa alliance, along with five or six other states. I think Egypt, the Emirates, Iran were a few of them.

2:02:38 And Javier Mele getting into office with the conspicuous intervention of X is what allowed Javier Mele to cancel that accession of Argentina to BRICS. And recently, Elon Musk met with Javier Mele at one of these think tank summits. And the connection would be in lithium. Argentina has the largest unexploited lithium reserves in the world. It sits in the middle of the lithium triangle with Bolivia and Chile, although Argentina has the most by far and they're not exploited at all. Now that Javier Mele is in charge, he's a neoliberal free market guy, and I think a lot of people agree with that. I mean, I'm a free market guy also. I believe in capitalism. But Javier Mele is now realigning Argentina away from China, away from Russia, away from Brazil, back towards the United States. And just as Argentina goes with the United States, so goes their lithium reserves.

2:03:36 Of course, what is lithium used in? It's one of the most critical resources in the world. Batteries. Batteries, lithium ion batteries that will be vital for the energy transition, the global green energy transition away from combustion-based car engines to lithium ion electric car battery-based systems. And so Elon Musk, well, he's in the business of batteries. He's in the business of electric lithium ion battery cars. Now that Javier Mele is giving the United States the exclusive access to the lithium, and if you look at some of the particular companies, you might wonder, did X play a role in Javier Mele's election last fall? And then wouldn't that suggest that there might be some sort of opportunistic angle for Elon purchasing X? I think there's a lot of credibility to that idea. With that being said, however,

CHAPTER 33 / 49 Discussion

Mass Media Access, Right-Wing Political Strategy

Access to mass media platforms is essential for the right wing to compete politically, raise funds, and advocate for candidates. Fuentes argues that being banned does not help a cause in the long term, as it removes patriots from the primary arena of public discourse. He emphasizes that a new generation is being raised on the ideas of figures like Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones, creating a long-term demographic shift.

mass media· citizen journalism· andrew tate· tucker carlson· 2024 election

2:04:29 You and I coming back onto the platform and using that to get Donald Trump elected, using that to raise awareness about the things that are going on in the world, as you said earlier, about globalism, about medical tyranny, about transhumanism, I think it's a net positive regardless. I think it can't be said enough. It really, truly can't be overstated what that does for the right wing. without big tech, without access to the billions of active users that are on all the combined social media. We're just not, we're not playing the same game as the left. We're not playing in the same arena. We're not playing the same sport. And so there's this old myth, I'm sure you've heard it a million times. They say, well, if you get banned on social media, it actually helps you out because it brings more attention to your cause. You and I both know that is true to a very limited extent.

2:05:17 But on net, it is not real. If right-wing people cannot have access to the latest technology of mass media, we are effectively not in politics. If you can't use mass media to raise money, promulgate your ideas, advocate for your candidates, you You are not playing the same sport as the left in politics. So, as always with everything, when these big moves are happening with billionaires and foreign states and tech companies, there's always intelligence agencies behind it. There's always a national security prerogative. It's always interest-based. Our job is to surf on those waves. Our job

2:05:55 as citizen journalists and patriots is to surf on those big trends and really look at the big picture in the long term. You know, there are things that are going to be going on in the next election and with the next Congress, but there's an entire generation of young people that are being raised by Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes and Andrew Tate and Tucker Carlson and people that are going to love humanity and love America and love freedom and love Christianity. And that's the kind of game that we need to be playing. People having kids now, they're going to have a lot of kids that will grow up in the future. And they're going to be the ones that are inheriting America, as opposed to left-wing people that are not having kids. And then their genetic line dies out, and I think they won't even be in the game in another generation. That's right. They're committing cultural suicide and physical suicide. Nick Fuentes is our guest. I've got 100 questions. I'm sure he's got 100 points he wants to make. We'll take a quick break.

CHAPTER 34 / 49 Discussion

HR 6090, Banning the New Testament

House Bill HR 6090, the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, is criticized for effectively banning portions of the New Testament by adopting the IHRA definition of anti-semitism. The bill has faced opposition from a bipartisan group of lawmakers, including Chip Roy and Jared Nadler, who argue it infringes on religious freedom. The legislation allows a foreign-controlled NGO to dictate the Justice Department's definitions of illegal speech.

hr 6090· first amendment· new testament· chip roy· jared nadler

2:07:34 that's a great way to get all of the nano silver products like Super Blue. That is that Dr Jones naturals dot com with the tea tree with the iodine with the nano silver concentrated toothpaste, fluoride free. That's a daughter Jones naturals dot com Next level financial energy, not a stimulant, but methyl folate. The breakdown of the energy cells used. It is amazing next level and we're going to be doing a lot of that. And at info war store dot com. We've got so many amazing products that are there as well. We have nitric boost that cleans out your blood, your cardiovascular system. There's so many things. It's back in stock. 40% off at

2:08:12 the infowarsstore.com. We have ultimate fish oil, the highest grade official is incredible. Thanks for your brain, your entire body, your cardiovascular system. It's back in stock 40% off at infowarsstore.com or again, Dr Jones naturals dot com. Okay, Nick. I'm glad you bring up the anti Semitism bill because we didn't talk much other than a few text messages about you coming on about what the topics would be. And that's something front and center for me. And I saw you a week ago, a clip was sent to me and I'm not mad about it. I've made comments about you, most of them tongue in cheek, flip it comments or whatever. And you were like, yeah, we've seen the new Greg Reese report, Zionist death grip on America, let's put it on screen. And I'm not trying to get a fight going here for the last three quarters of the show, I'm just getting this out, okay? And you're like, yeah, well, I think Jones is doing this because there's pressure on him to do it. No.

2:09:09 I hired Gregory's five years ago. I respect Gregory's. He does whatever he wants, but I've made two films on the USS Liberty and bombs and the Israelis and 9-11 that I produced and made. And I'm not trying to like this old man state because I was on air unlike most people I was on air when I was 20 like you. So I respect somebody when they're 20 on air and now you're 25, 26. I don't look at it like, oh, hey, sonny boy, get off my block. I'm the old man around here, I'm 50 years old. The point is when you were literally in diapers, I was exposed in the U.S.S. Liberty and all this, and I get it. I don't talk about it constantly because to me it's old news, but I know Israel does evil stuff. I know Israel has nuclear weapons. I know Israel's been involved in a bunch of stuff. I understand all that. So it's not about scoring points here. It's that I believe that if I just cover topics and issues

2:10:03 I can get everybody to go for them, but if we make it about a certain group or another group, then we lose people. I just believe that if I build it, they will come. I believe that if I oppose global government and oppose central bank digital currencies and oppose transgenderism and oppose whatever the policies of whoever runs it, Rothschilds, people like that, that we will beat them with the Big Ten. And I'm not saying you're you're your way of doing things. I get the few jokes you make, the few things out of context. It's like Sandy Hook barely ever talked about it. And you made that point on the spaces and they make this whole, that's my identity. And I did all this and I peed on kids' graves. I get what's been done to you. All I'm saying is, is that before we get into the anti-Semitism bill,

2:10:44 that it's not just me, it's dozens of congressmen and women, including Democrats, that have come out and said this ends free speech, it bans the New Testament. It does. I already covered it for three, four days. I guess I've got the bill. And I love how when I was on Spaces with you, that's when I blew up. People thought I already had to leave. They thought I got mad at you. I'm like going, hey, this bill literally bans the New Testament and this bill, you know, gives this foreign multinational Israeli NGO control over the definition for the Justice Department. This guy goes, shut up, you're a liar, blah, blah, blah, blah. And I'm just like, in an hour gone by, I had to go because it was my daughter's birthday. But I was in agreeance with you about that because I can read the bill. But it's not just Alex Jones or Nick Fuentes, it's Chip Roy, you know, it's Gary, it's Jared Nadler.

2:11:34 So, and it also fits into all this. Let me give people an overhead shot here. This is just what I've got in the stack today. In Germany, in the Netherlands, in France, they're arresting members of their parliaments and Congress that quote government numbers that 80% of the rapes are Muslims. Okay, I'm not against Muslims. I'm just saying, I'm also, you know, pointing that out. Elon Musk put that out. AFD politician convicted for warning about gang rapes. Canada imposed to imprison anyone who ever posted hate speech online that criticizes any group and the ADL's involved in that. So it just goes on from there and then I've got the bill HR 6090 that anybody can read.

2:12:18 This is the murder of the First Amendment. It's so bad I can't even believe it. And then it lets this group, this International Holocaust Remembrance UNNGO, define what it is and says it's an open definition. So we can talk about this right now. All I'm saying is I just oppose what's happening. Instead of giving it the energy and kind of getting on its level. So that's where I'm at. And then I sit there and you're like, oh, Elon's greater. You know, you're on a show where people disagree with you. Oh, they're great for the free speech. But me, I'm like, 90% alignable what you're doing. And then I'm in a special category, though, to be judged that I'm not, you know,

2:12:57 a purist, everybody has their own purist view, but I am a purist from my perspective. Nobody's telling me under the table what to do. I'm not getting programming from a satellite in orbit or something. I really try to morally make the best decisions about having a free open society. So I gave you the floor earlier, we're gonna skip this break coming up. I just talked six, seven minutes. I'm gonna give you the floor for another 10 minutes to talk about this. And if you want, we can go through the bill because the denial about what is in this bill, like, oh, you're denying Ivermectin worked or denying any of this. It's cut and dry. It's so dangerous. And

CHAPTER 35 / 49 Discussion

Title VI Enforcement, Campus Anti-Semitism Monitors

A suite of bills in Congress aims to deploy "anti-semitism monitors" to university campuses to observe student rhetoric. These monitors would work in conjunction with the new Title VI definitions to trigger federal investigations into schools that allow anti-Israel protests. The goal is described as using federal teeth to force university administrations to shut down political demonstrations.

title vi· department of education· campus protests· columbia university· ucla

2:13:34 And it does make me get really pissed at Israel and their leaders because this is Israel openly through the Congress, bipartisanly, literally saying we're gonna kick people out of college and we're gonna indict people for quoting the Bible. And it's in there and it says it. So this is a lie in the sand, Nick. I absolutely agree with you. I think this is one of the things where we're 100% aligned and you know we do have kind of a playful back and forth on some of these things but it's I think it's good and I think you're right we both absolutely agree on total free speech and I think you recognize a lot of the things that Israel does that's wrong and I do too and I think that's why nobody can say that you're getting

2:14:14 Jewish space laser signals or something that are telling you what to do. But this bill, I think it's very interesting actually precisely what's in it. Because I've seen a lot of people talk about the bill and the way that they frame it, they say that the bill outlaws anti-Semitism. And that's not, and you pointed this out on your show, which I appreciate it because you do the research and I think you deliver the real information. The bill specifically says, as you said, that it adopts the open definition of the IHRA specifically for the Department of Education. And so what that means is that a student can file a Title VI civil rights complaint using that definition

2:14:53 And that will define what a civil rights violation might be. So for example, if they go to University of Columbia, or UCLA, or one of these universities where these protests are taking place, and a Jewish student hears rhetoric like, from the river to the sea, or really generally any anti-Israel rhetoric, or as you said, even things in the New Testament. If those things are said or heard on campus by a Jewish student, according to the IHRA definition, that is antisemitism. And using the IHRA definition to define civil rights

2:15:30 That means then that the particular school under the university, rather under the Department of Education would be subject to some kind of Justice Department investigation. And so I think that what the bill is specifically designed to do is to go after the schools so that the schools shut down the protests. But this isn't the only bill. It comes with a suite of bills, specifically another bill. It's a pair. There is the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, which defines anti-Semitism for Title VI. There's another separate bill. which I don't think got as much attention, which says that anti-Semitism monitors will be deployed to universities on request by students. I don't actually know the particular mechanism for this, but you could see how those two bills work hand in glove. Congress passed a bill that says monitors to the campus to listen and observe and look out for anti-Semitism. The second bill defines

2:16:28 anti-semitism or I should say ties the definition of anti-semitism to the IHRA definition for Title 6 enforcement. They're putting out the scouts, they're putting out the spies, and then the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act is the teeth. That's the enforcement. And it's meant to shut down the protests. Of course, why this really matters for people like you and me and for the people that watch your show and my show is the bigger context of what's happening in the Middle East. Let's not forget that just a few weeks ago- Hold on, I want to get there, Nick, and I'm going to give you the floor again, but let's just walk back here a little bit. It's worse than what you're saying.

CHAPTER 36 / 49 Discussion

National Security Strategy, Foreign Subversion Concerns

The Biden administration's 2021 National Security Strategy identified "white supremacy" as the top domestic threat, which critics say is used to target political opponents of open borders and lockdowns. The codification of IHRA definitions into state laws in Florida, Texas, and South Dakota is viewed as an act of foreign subversion. These laws often require state contractors to sign oaths promising not to boycott Israel.

national security strategy· white supremacy· foreign subversion· south dakota· florida

2:17:06 Because Chip Roy said this lawyers have looked at it. I can read it. It's clear. It gives a UN NGO Israeli controlled control over Title VI for the reporting and then trains the federal government on what is legal or illegal and says things like Jews killed Jesus. Well, whether that's true or not, it's in the Bible and the Roman history says that, I'm not even talking Jews, whether they said the moon is made of cheese or Jews didn't kill Jesus or Jews, you know, or Papa Smurf, whatever it is, we should all be allowed to say it. And so it's not and I think I'm not saying you're wrong. I just think you're only covering one sector. This is a lot bigger than these Soros communist funded deals to create this clash. This is about the National Security Directive of Biden in June of 2021 where he said white supremacy is the number one threat. He defines it against open borders, against lockdowns, against forced shots, against

2:17:59 election fraud. So we're being defined as white people and as populist as bad. We do have to respond to that at that level. So this is quite frankly, I want you to elaborate on this far worse than what I think you were just saying. I mean, this is, this bill is unprecedented. A foreign group, I mean, we talk about the UN has this UN treaty and it gives the countries the power for total tyranny. And Tedros says, well, don't worry. Your countries will have the power, but it's through the UN. They cede power to the UN, it gives the power back to them through treaty. What I'm saying is this is a treaty with a UN-Israeli NGO criminally controlling the definitions of the Justice Department. This is an act of war. This is insane. I'm sorry to interrupt. Go ahead.

2:18:46 No, I absolutely agree. It is absolutely un-American and it is totally outrageous and it should be illegal. This is what this represents is foreign subversion. Unfortunately, I would say it's not totally unprecedented because this same IHRA definition of anti-Semitism has already been codified into state law and I think 35 or 36 states, they just did it in South Dakota. Florida, Texas, it's shameful. Absolutely. And they have applied it on college campuses, specifically in Florida. And they've also forced certain contractors for state government in states like Texas to sign an oath

2:19:24 that they won't support things like BDS, Boycott, Divest and Sanction against Israel. So sadly, and you're right, it speaks to the enormity of the problem. It's an absolutely massive problem. It's an attack on the Constitution. It's an attack on national sovereignty. And it's coming, as you said, from one of these foreign NGOs waged against our people and against our civil rights. And you're right also, and I think this is important, It doesn't matter what you believe about the material statements that are considered anti-Semitism under the law, which like you said would include the gospel, which says that again, according to some readings, they'll say it's Jews killed Jesus or some other thing. It doesn't matter what you think about that material statement or everything else is covered under the definition.

CHAPTER 37 / 49 Discussion

Benjamin Netanyahu, Arrogance and Sovereignty

Benjamin Netanyahu's demand for U.S. intervention against the ICC is characterized as an arrogant display of foreign influence over American sovereignty. The segment notes that Netanyahu has historically received dozens of standing ovations during speeches to joint sessions of Congress. The discussion emphasizes that American policy should be dictated by American interests rather than the mandates of foreign heads of state.

benjamin netanyahu· sovereignty· joint session of congress· idf· aliyah

2:20:10 What matters is that this is a foreign nonprofit backed by a foreign government, backed by supranational institutions coming into America, coming into state, local and federal government and saying, we're now going to define your criminal code and we're now going to circumscribe what Americans are allowed to say in the United States. And I think that this has to become one of the big issues of our time. I don't know. It is. You also got the UN taking control of health care. So what I'm saying is, the UN is not going to come in blue helmets. It's going to come with open borders and NGOs. Let me play you the newest clip today that John Bowne put out. I won't play the whole six-minute report. It's hit band on video. It's an info wars. It starts with Netanyahu days ago arrogantly saying he expects us to click our heels

2:20:58 I don't care if the British said this or the French or the Chinese. I literally don't hate the Jews or Israel, but I'm hating what's going on with their leader. And he's literally saying, I expect you, just like he did two weeks ago and now they're passing laws with the protest, I expect you to get up here and to stop us being indicted for the carpet bombing with Lavender and the AI murder machine. Here's just the first 20 seconds of the report. is contemplating issuing arrest warrants against senior Israeli government and military officials as war criminals. Israel expects the leaders of the free world to stand firmly against the ICC's outrageous assault on Israel's inherent right of self-defense. We expect them to use all the means at their disposal to stop this dangerous move. My administration, with our second gentleman's leadership, has launched our nation's first national security strategy to counter anti-Semitism.

2:21:56 Let's stop there. They all they all he says jump. They say hi. This is humiliating imagine if GG pink said I expect you to pass laws for us the arrogance of this It's totally arrogant, and we would not tolerate or accept it from any other country. And it's not the first time. Netanyahu would stroll into our country, and he would speak before a joint session of Congress. And you could go—I mean, I think they did a series of speeches over the years. And depending on the year, he would go in, and there would be dozens of standing ovations, like half the runtime of the speech. For Bibi Netanyahu, a foreign head of state, in front of a joint session of Congress would be 30, 40 standing ovations taking up 40 minutes of the entire speech. As you said, it is humiliating, it is emasculating, and it's also a principle that is universally applied.

2:22:48 It's not singling out a particular country. It's talking about any country. As you say, if it was Xi Jinping, if this was the president of Iran, if this was Putin, if this was the president of France, we would say exactly the same thing. What this really is is a sovereignty movement. It's about American sovereignty, American independence, Americans from America, born in America, for America. Not supranational government, not non-partisan. And let me back you up, because I've got the bill HR 6090. Here is the definition from the group that they say is in charge. It says if you question the loyalty of any Jews in America, it's right here, and say that they're for Israel. Well, we have a bunch of members of Congress wear Israeli uniforms there and admit that they have loyalty to that. So they're trying to outlaw stating fact? I mean, I'm just, I'm tired of this.

2:23:42 I'm with you. I am absolutely with you because you're right. These are empirical facts. It's not like these are subjective opinions. It's not even like it's rhetoric. As you say, to question the loyalty of a Jewish person and whether they have some allegiance to Israel As you and I know, I think as everyone knows, yes, Jews have some ties, not all of them, but many Jews have ties to their homeland. And many of them wear the uniform. Many of them make an aliyah, they will travel to the country and they'll take up arms in the IDF. So these are facts, these are factual statements. And yet under this definition from a foreign nonprofit, they say that that qualifies as a civil rights violation in the Department of Education. And of course, the universities is where you're supposed to have these conversations.

CHAPTER 38 / 49 Discussion

Rafah Invasion, Netanyahu's Political Survival

The Israeli military invasion of Rafah is proceeding despite international opposition and warnings from the Biden administration. Critics argue that Netanyahu is prolonging the conflict to remain in power and avoid domestic legal consequences. Evidence suggests that the Likud party historically facilitated funding for Hamas via Qatar to divide Palestinian political leadership and prevent a two-state solution.

rafah· gaza· hamas· qatar· likud party

2:24:25 Where else in the United States of America is it more appropriate to have an intellectual political discussion about these matters than a university campus? That's where it's being attacked by these groups at the department of education. And we do have the Islamists attacking Jews and not letting them in and that's all wrong. We've talked a lot about that. I'm against both things that are going on. It's like if there's two car wrecks, I'm against both of them. I don't hate any of these people, but what do you think Israel is like 70% is against Netanyahu. He used October 7th to stay in power. So I don't want to say it's one monolithic, you know, power group there, but the whole world is turning against Israel right now. What do you think is going to come out of that? Well, it's a very big problem for them. And I think that's why Netanyahu has become so unpopular. It remains to be seen. I mean, it's very possible that they will throw him out and attempt to throw out all of that bad baggage with him.

2:25:21 On the other hand, I think that Israel has been putting itself in this position for a long time. I think they put themselves in that position with the Muslim world for generations. If you read bin Laden's letter to America, if you read the World Trade Center bomber, his letter and justification for it, I mean, they blame America's support for Israel on these attacks. So I think it's a horrible situation and this is where I think the Zionists and Israelis would do well to heed the warning of people like me and you. When we criticize these things... But Nick, Nick, interrupt. They're not. They're rolling into Rafa right now. We'll put the night vision up. It's nighttime there. What do you make of this? The invasion in Rafa, it's happening in defiance of the entire world. This is in defiance of the United States, it's in defiance of all their Arab, even their allied neighbors like Jordan. Yeah, because it's not seven Arab nations ganged up on them, then we support Israel. I get that. This is Israel with high-tech weapons ganging up on women and children.

2:26:15 That's absolutely right. I mean, you could say theoretically that you could support an operation or a campaign, but the Gaza Strip is very small. It's a small population. Half the population, more than half, are legal minors under the age of 18. They've been starving them, bombing them, depriving them of medical equipment, tell them to evacuate and then bomb them while evacuating, bombing them when they get to where they were supposed to evacuate to. And this is where the Biden administration comes in and says, look, we're not against the operation. We're not saying you don't have a right to defend yourself or conduct a foreign policy, but do it with some laws of war.

2:26:52 or basic principles, ethics of war in mind. And we have now conditioned the military aid upon this. It seems that Joe Biden is now delaying some of the shipments of bombs to Israel out of fear that they're going to use this in Rafa. But this is really about Netanyahu's quest to stay in power. And I think everyone in Israel even knows that. Netanyahu knows that when the war is over, he's out. He also knows that if he doesn't go into Rafa, his governing coalition breaks apart because it's these two extremists his finance minister, his national security minister. They're the ones that are pressing him to do this. If he doesn't go forward with it, they're not going to support him. He loses the prime minister. And that's why he's the main suspect in the stand down. We know the stand down happened October 7th. And I think Iran's involved in this. This is disgusting. Iran gets more power out of the attacks. They do these missile attacks against each other. It's all just posturing.

2:27:44 Absolutely, yes. Well, and people would do well to analyze the age-old question, who benefits? When you look at something like October 7th, and you hate to say that, you hate to impugn the motives of a person like that, but the evidence is there. They were aware up to a year or two prior to October 7th that Hamas was plotting an attack exactly like the one they carried out on October 7th. all came out in October and November of last year. They even witnessed Hamas preparing and training for that specific type of attack. It took them far more hours than it should have for them to respond on the day of. And there was also, I saw recently on X, a report that went viral of Netanyahu asking Qatar to provide more money from Hamas. That's the dirty little secret.

2:28:31 That's at the core of all of this, which is that these maximalists, these Likud party types like Netanyahu, they support Hamas. They fund Hamas. They want Hamas to get bigger because it's like Star Wars. And that's my next point, is that Israel in the 70s founded Hamas. That's not debated. And that's what I get attacked like, oh, you're pro-Muslim or you're pro-Israel. No, I'm saying whether you're the Muslims or the average Jew, they're not in control of the government. The government's working on the top to do this. Nick, that's my point. Even with the leftist communists leading the Muslims, I'm against the Palestinians being murdered. But I also see the Democratic Party is literally funding this as the pretext for civil unrest ahead of Trump's election.

CHAPTER 39 / 49 Discussion

World War III Risk, Iran-Israel Direct Hostilities

The bombing of the Iranian embassy in Damascus and Iran's subsequent missile retaliation marked the first direct military conflict between the two nations. This escalation has moved the "shadow war" into open hostilities, increasing the risk of a regional conflagration. Israel's long-term strategic goal is identified as the destruction of Iran's nuclear weapons complex and the diminishing of Hezbollah in Lebanon.

world war iii· iran· damascus· hezbollah· nuclear program

2:29:11 I think there is a lot of truth to that and you're right. I mean, it is the government in Israel. Of course, you can't blame millions of people for the actions of the state over there, just like you can't blame the millions of Americans for the actions of the state or the power players over here. But what's important to consider is those, as we just talked about even on the last segment about Musk and Malay, it's always important to follow the money and it's always important to ask who benefits from particular things and to interrogate those questions. I think that What is so important about your show against contra, things like Fox News, and not to shade other conservatives, but contra other sources, is that it is important for right-wing people to do the research. Every day you got a stack of papers on your desk, you're reading international news, you're reading between the lines. Conservatives have to get better at this because I think we've

2:30:00 been put in a very unfortunate position because we have allowed ourselves to be tricked by these kind of facile media narratives from fake conservatives for generations. It's only when you actually follow the money and follow who benefits in particular, which individuals, firms, governments, who benefits from certain things. And in the case of this Hamas invasion on October 7th, The one way to look at that is that it's a horrible catastrophe, and it was. What is equally true is that it has served as the pretext for a very aggressive, very ambitious campaign in Gaza, which it seems fulfills a long-held goal and ambition by Netanyahu and his party, not just for him politically, but also for him and their party ideologically and their plans for terror planning. Sure, they stand to gain. We're going to start the next and final hour, but you were telling me off air, the best place to go is your rumble.

2:30:52 How do people sign up and follow you on Rumble? Rumble.com slash Nick J. Fuentes. And as you said, I do a daily show. So I'd appreciate if everybody followed me there because I'm doing this sort of stuff every night. And it's live there right now. That's right. We're live streaming it here. I love it. All right. We'll be right back with Nick Fuentes straight ahead. Hour number three. I'm going to hear what he wants to talk about next. I've asked a bunch of questions. We're going to ask him what he wants to hit next. the Huskers. We're back in two minutes. Follow us and relax shows. All right. Point is our guest. I'm your host Alex Jones and to the most controversial people in the world here on air together right now. Some stations don't care. This first five minutes 300 plus dude in five minutes, Nick. I've asked a lot of the questions the first hour in this hour. Anything you want to talk about? What's front and center for you?

2:31:47 What's front and center for me, what I've been talking so much about on my show and on X, and lately on X and before that on Telegram, is I think that now more than ever the time is to talk about World War III and the threat that that poses right now with Iran and Hezbollah. I think that's probably the least covered thing, at least particularly in this moment, as we talked about in the last hour. The Rafah invasion has begun. The tanks and troops are rolling in, they're bombing. And I think now nobody's talking about the threat of this war escalating and widening into a full-on regional conflict. And I think that what you're seeing across the country, I think the tie-in, because we talked about some angles of the anti-Semitism bill, and I think we hit the big picture.

2:32:33 But I think what is not being talked about enough is that there is a very concerted effort to silence anybody that is talking about what's going on over there and the risk of this war spiraling out of control. And we talked about the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act. We talked about the Anti-Semitism monitors. But that is just the latest episode in what has been going on at college campuses. Before that, they went after the presidents of Harvard and UPenn, Claudine Gay and I think it's Eliza McGill over there at University of Pennsylvania. And that was in October, November, December, and January, where they decapitated the administration at those schools.

2:33:12 Now, they're going after the protesters with these dual laws. The Title VI redefinition of antisemitism, the deployment of the monitors. And I think it's all related to what we're seeing now in Rafa. And what I try to touch on in the last segment, we took it a little bit of a different direction, but this is all framed in the context of what happened with Iran a few weeks ago, which is that Israel bombed the Iranian embassy in Damascus, Syria, killing seven Iranian generals. And then as everybody saw, within two or three weeks, Iran retaliated by sending hundreds of drones, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles at Israel.

2:33:54 That is the event that cleared the way for the $26 billion aid package in Congress to clear and for that money then to go to Israel. I think though the significance was lost on a lot of people, which is that was the first time in the history of planet Earth when the Islamic Republic of Iran and the state of Israel engaged in open, direct hostilities. When Israelis bombed Iranian soil effectively by bombing an embassy, And Iran retaliated by bombing Israel from Iran. And so what was for decades a shadow war between those two states, which consisted in proxy war, assassinations, industrial or military sabotage,

2:34:39 has now become direct missile and drone strikes between the two countries. And I think that when you consider the entire thing, not just in light of what has happened since October 7th, but even before that, even if you go back decades to the clean break memo in the 1990s, The prize for Iran, or rather for Israel, is Iran's nuclear weapons program. It's that nuclear complex in five or six cities in Iran. And I think that Israel's ambitions don't stop with Rafa, and they don't stop with Gaza. What they said after the October 7 attack is they want to completely redefine the geopolitical balance of power in the region forever.

2:35:20 They don't accomplish that just by annexing Gaza or just by securing military control over Gaza. They're doing that by, as many of their more radical members in the government have said, diminishing Hezbollah in south Lebanon and by bombing Iran's nuclear program directly, which is what they sort of hinted at when they launched a minor drone attack on the airport in Isfahan, which is part of Iran's nuclear complex. So I think We're in a very dangerous game and this is where I think your analysis is so sorely needed. It's dialectic. It's about being forced into a paradoxical situation or catch 22 where there are no good options. Where on the one hand, we have this mass mobilization on the campuses, leftists and right-wingers fighting. Next day there, we're back in one minute. Explain dialectics when we come back.

CHAPTER 40 / 49 Discussion

Hegelian Dialectic, Campus Protests and War

The campus protests are analyzed through the lens of a Hegelian dialectic, where radical leftists and right-wingers are being maneuvered into a "powder keg" scenario. While the protests may slow down U.S. entry into a war with Iran, they also provide the pretext for the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act's crackdown on the First Amendment. Patriots are urged to avoid being used by either side of the manufactured conflict.

hegelian dialectic· campus protests· iran war· first amendment· blm

2:36:15 All right, if you're just joining us, the world is going to a major period of upheaval and crisis. The old financial system is going down. The globalists are trying to flex their muscles, but they're in deep trouble. And Nick Fuentes, one of the most sensitive people in the world, was just getting into Iran and Israel and the strikes against each other and the Hegelian dialectic, where Israel and the US and Iran aren't perfectly synced, but they all get power out of a war. You got cut off explaining the Hegelian dialectic. That's right. So I was talking about this situation where on the one hand we have never been at a greater risk of being drawn into a war with Iran. And that was always the concern when we after 9-11 when we embarked on the series of foreign adventures in the Middle East there were really three primary targets and they were Iraq,

2:37:08 Syria and Iran. We know what happened to Iraq. Saddam Hussein got overthrown in a major 20-year ground war. Syria was destabilized by this all-in proxy conflict between 100 different countries over a period of 10 years. And that has left in this decade Iran and what is to be done about one of the great powers in the Middle East that still does not accept or seek to normalize relations with Israel, and which is also developing what appears to be a civilian cover for a nuclear program and for a missile program in the form of nuclear energy and space and rockets.

2:37:43 And so on the one hand, you have this dynamic that with what's going on, this conflagration over there in Gaza, we are at a very high risk of being drawn into hostilities with Iran directly, as evidenced by the recent tit-for-tat strikes. At the same time, there is a mass mobilization on campuses to attempt to retard this. And as you say, the people that are deploying to the campuses, These people don't love America, they're leftists. A lot of them are going on the campuses really for the wrong reasons. I mean, they're with the campus or rather they're with Palestine, not because they're sympathetic even for the humanitarian cause. A lot of them are just radical liberationists. And so we're not ideologically aligned at all. And yet deploying all those people to the campuses may retard America's support for a war with Iran.

2:38:34 So there's these two things going on. War with Iran, mass mobilization on the campuses. The mass mobilization on the campuses, if it gets out of control, as we talked about in a previous segment, could create a false flag scenario that could bring down Trump and indict patriots and undo the free speech beach hat. At the same time, the campus protests are the only thing slowing down America's support or its reluctant drawing into a war with Iran. So we're in this impossible situation where you shut down the protests, Maybe you get a war with Iran. You prevent a war with Iran by

2:39:14 going to the protesters and capitulating, but then you get this flashpoint for an all-out war in America. And so there's this very, very slim, narrow opportunity where we have to thread the needle, where on the one hand, we can't let the protests turn into BLM. We can't have them mobilizing in the event that Trump wins for some kind of revolution. We saw a little bit of that in 2016 with Antifa. At the same time, we also can't be drawn into a war with Iran. So this is why it's very important for patriots and for America First types to be aware of all the facts. I feel like it's sort of the same energy of Star Wars. I know you and I are both fond of Revenge of the Sith, where they're kind of playing both sides in a way where they achieve their ultimate goal. And I see, for example, they're characterizing all these protesters as pro-Hamas, pro-terrorist,

2:40:07 The cops are going in and cleaning them up. And I see a lot of right-wing people cheering that on and celebrating it. And I understand why. The protesters are not friendly to us. They're hard, as I said, they're hardcore leftists, communists. They're tearing down the American flag. At the same time, look at the cost of bringing down the protests. It's an attack on the First Amendment with the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act. It's potentially clearing the protests so that there will be no opposition to America's support for Israel if they try to provoke a war with Iran. Well, exactly. And then it sets the precedent for everybody to lose their free speech.

2:40:44 Precisely. And for even people like you and I to criticize what's going on over there or criticize anything. So I guess the message to America First patriots is to be very keenly aware of the games that are being played. And the heuristic is this, or the principle is this, people need to start saying this. We have to take our own side. Americans, Christians, you, me, we don't agree on everything, but we have to take our own side. And what that means is we can't be used by the Palestinians. We also can't be used by Israel. We can't be used by the leftists on the campus. We also can't be used by these non-profits from foreign countries that are trying to ban Houthis. I told you, we've got to stop being sucked into

CHAPTER 41 / 49 Discussion

Global Anarchy, Lavender AI Murder Machine

The use of "Lavender," an AI-driven targeting system in Gaza, represents a terrifying shift toward autonomous warfare where machines decide who to kill. This technology is part of a broader trend of global anarchy and conflict appearing in Ukraine, Venezuela, and the Middle East. The delegation of lethal authority to algorithms is described as the "end of humanity" and a tool for mass murder.

lavender ai· facial recognition· autonomous weapons· ukraine· venezuela

2:41:27 Gang wars or tribal wars like what the hell why why are we sucked into like Crips and Bloods or Jews versus Palestinians? Why why do I gotta pay for the what I gotta pay for Ukraine 200 million dollars like I'm done our country's falling apart I'm not against the Ukrainians went against the Jews. I'm just like I'm done I'm done too. The country's in total decline. I mean, the cities are up for grabs. It's vagabonds and opportunists have totally taken over everything. Standards are declining everywhere. The country, as you and I know, is unrecognized. We're on fumes right now.

2:42:05 Absolutely. And we just a month ago passed a $95 billion aid package. It's a giveaway. $60 billion for Ukraine, $26 for Israel, $7 for Taiwan. I'm old enough to remember. I know you said I was in diapers when you were talking about the Liberty, but I am old enough to remember Trump asked for $17 billion to build the border wall. $17 billion. No, no, but Dick, I wasn't putting you down. I'm glad you're young and successful. I know, I know. It's annoying to go, Jones, whatever, I saw the club. I'm just you're like Jones is only doing this now because people are no I made two films on it. I'm just a little annoying So but moving on from that I want to get in a fight about that Let's shift gears into other fields that I watch your show some but I've already really get into this but you're a smart guy I want your opinion on the next Koba tyranny the next lockdown the UN Kovat bill

2:42:58 that takes over our bodies, the transhumanism, the WEF, because they're so powerful. What's your view on all that and where that's going? Well, I think it's disturbing because it's accelerating very rapidly. And you mentioned very briefly on the last segment this Lavender AI that they're deploying in Israel to target the Palestinians, a facial recognition technology. What's disturbing is we don't know the real extent of it. We know that they are restricting how much of the artificial intelligence software is killed. Well, we know Israel says it's okay, we kill a bunch of people, a robot did it, and then they admit it's killing five times more. So they're like, it's okay, we're killing civilians, a robot said do it. That's like advocating your responsibility, it's very dangerous.

2:43:45 It's terrifying. The combination of these unmanned ground and air vehicles combined with facial recognition and artificial intelligence, it's not hard to see where this goes. And that is mass murder, because if you can send machines into battle and delegate the authority or responsibility to take life to an artificial intelligence learning algorithm, This lands in full-on slaughter and I don't think it goes back to Nuremberg where they say we're only following orders Regardless, that's the current thing. So were you just give your responsibility over? Oh machine said I'm gonna do it This is taking humans out of the decision process. This is the end of humanity This is what you've all know. Harari calls the post human world. I

2:44:31 That's exactly right. And it's these military applications which are so terrifying, and we don't even know the full extent of it. I mean, you know, when they released ChatGPT, consumers got a taste of it. It was so powerful, it meaningfully started to replace lawyers and doctors. People were using it to get legal advice and medical advice. They actually had to go back and revise ChatGPT and make it weaker because it was too powerful. And that was just a public product. That's just what we know about. We don't even know how sophisticated Oh, let me back you up. I know some of the top computer people, I'm sure you do too. They tell me what we're seeing is 10 years old. They're holding it back. It would take everything over right now. I mean, I already, listen, six months ago, the AI hacked my phone number, called me on Tucker Carlson's number, and then mimicked Tucker Carlson's voice to me, but I could tell what it was saying wasn't Tucker, so I said, this is AI, and it hung up, and then it was confirmed it was AI. I mean, that's old technology.

CHAPTER 42 / 49 Discussion

Technocracy vs. Humanity, AI Arms Control

The existential threat of technocracy involves the replacement of human decision-making with artificial intelligence and robotics. Figures like Yuval Noah Harari are criticized for promoting a "post-human" world that serves the interests of a global elite. The discussion calls for AI arms control and a unified human resistance against the dehumanizing effects of modern technology.

technocracy· yuval noah harari· arms control· robotics· transhumanism

2:45:28 Absolutely. And well, that's the problem is we don't even, I mean, people like yourself are aware, but the masses are not fully aware of the threat that's posed by this stuff. It's not even public what's out there. So see, I'd rather not fight Muslim versus Jew, Christian. I get the fights there. I'm not saying it's not real. I'd rather unify and say, we don't release biological weapons with COVID, or we don't release nuclear weapons because it'll kill us. We have to decide to not do this. We, humans control our own evolution. To me, that's the existential threat. I agree. Arms control in terms of artificial intelligence and robotics is really one of the understated issues of our time. It may be the biggest issue of our time. And it's simple. When you go to Chick-fil-A and a robot delivers your food at your table or a robot... Say, no, I don't want a robot. It's not that you're against technology. It's that the technology is being bent towards attacking us.

2:46:21 I don't know, I may push back. I mean, when you go to the drive-thru and you get an AI, I prefer that over what you usually get. You go to Wendy's drive-thru and they're like, what you want? What you want? You know, I prefer the artificial intelligence. No, but I get it's better in ways, but it's like you put a worm on a hook. The worm is the AI gets it done better, but it's connected to something evil. I'm not saying the AI isn't better up front. I'm saying it gives them total control. So I'd rather somebody say, You know, three times I want a cheeseburger, you want a chicken sandwich, I told you a cheeseburger three times. Send it back, they give you a salad. I understand that's a human problem. But... I'm just teasing you a little bit. No, I know you're teasing me, man, but it's like... See, while you're all worried about religious groups and racial groups, and I am too, you get like, I'm worried about the technocracy, right? Like, I'm worried about that. That's what I'm really concerned about.

2:47:16 I think you're right to be concerned about that. It's certainly one of the big issues of the time, AI, robotics. It's the end of humanity. I totally agree with you. Well, maybe I can't help myself that I project humanity on every group, and I think they're going to want to join me. Maybe I'm wrong, Nick. Okay. You brought up a great point. Next point, what do you want to cover? Next point, why don't we cover, how about, we've covered a lot, the protesters. Why don't we cover the Trump trial. Yes. And not just New York, they just suspended the trial on immunity. They just suspended the trial on dealing with the documents. I mean, the wheels are coming off. What's going to happen there? I don't know. I think they've totally lost the plot, though. I mean, between the Fannie Willis thing in Georgia, now they're threatening to throw him in jail. They're postponing the document thing. I think the whole thing is completely fallen apart. It reminds me very much of the

2:48:12 and People say it's the deep state, it's the derp state. I mean, these guys are complete idiots. The people that set up Trump, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, they could barely keep it in their pants. Then you got this Fulton County trial with Fannie Willis. She hires one of her boyfriends who's never done a felony trial to be the judge, paying him 100 times, but the next highest paid judge is being paid. It's a joke, you know, but that's really the symptom of the country. I suppose that may be a source of optimism.

2:48:57 We look at what we're up against and it's an asymmetrical battle. They're richer than us, they're more powerful than us, they wield this technology that we've just talked about. But they're retarded. I mean, no, no, they literally are incompetent, which actually scares me more because a smart person knows their limits and is concerned. A dumb person doesn't. Yes, well, it cuts both ways, though. There's hubris. There's the hubris of going too far and doubling down when they should seek an off-ramp. At the same time, hubris leads to miscalculations. The goal, though, is to just avoid a catastrophe. We don't want a situation where the neocons and technocrats keep doubling down.

2:49:40 using force to suppress patriotism, using force to suppress by the way they're doing that Lithuania, France, they're all sending troops right now to fight the Russians. It's already happened. That's right, France too. They say that France is already there and Macron is talking about fighting them directly. I mean, it's on. It's on in Venezuela. It's on in Ukraine. It's on in the Middle East. It's going to be on in Taiwan shortly. It'll be on in Armenia, where Azerbaijan is looking to take advantage, Serbia and Kosovo. The whole world is about to blow up in conflict. We're already in World War III. It's just exactly the same as the period that preceded the last two world wars in the 20th century. So people would do well to get smart and pay attention and look at the real sources of information like what we're talking about rather than some of this other nonsense. And I tend to agree with you.

2:50:32 I think most of politics is a great big diversion. I know that, you know, maybe I place a little bit too much emphasis in your mind on some of these other things, but you're absolutely right that there is a global perspective. There is absolutely a universal global perspective of how we can all unite and try to avert this coming cataclysm. I think that's the only way to describe it, is a total cataclysm total fallout and it's coming very quickly. Period of global anarchy, conflict on every continent, and using a new class of weapons that we don't even fully understand. Weapons that we don't even fully control.

CHAPTER 43 / 49 Discussion

Schedule F, Uprooting the Deep State

A potential second Trump administration plans to use "Schedule F" to reclassify and fire up to 50,000 federal employees to uproot the "deep state." Nick Fuentes argues that the first Trump term was sabotaged by entrenched bureaucrats and that the next vice president will play a critical role in personnel decisions. The strategy involves replacing career officials with loyal patriots to ensure the executive agenda is implemented.

schedule f· federal employees· deep state· donald trump· 2024 election

2:51:09 So, if there ever was a time for the patriots of all nations to get together and rise up against the technocrats, now would be it. And I guess I'm just looking for a little cooperation. I mean, I hope that me getting re- to maybe bring it full circle, hopefully me getting reinstated on X is as a little olive branch, maybe to bring me and my faction back into the fold. Because I absolutely agree with you and whatever background people come from, if they agree with us on these matters, we're on the same side on this stuff. So I'm totally willing to go all in with you on the big tent and to look for agreement and to look for overlap. Let me ask you this big question. This is the big question. Obviously, you wouldn't want to be a dictator. You wouldn't want to be Tim Jeong Un. But if you were George Washington and you were the president,

2:52:00 How would you end these wars? What would you do politically? What would you do to the left? People say, oh, Trump's gonna get in and be a dictator. Well, we're not about retribution. I said this the first time with Roger Stone, but they've committed crimes. The deep state is embedded. It's a coup. So if there's a coup that's taking over your government, you've gotta go remove it. We're not looking for a fight. They already did it. So if you were the president, if you were President Trump January 21st, 2025, sworn in in front of the US Capitol, what would Nick Fuentes do? Well, day one I would fire 50,000 federal employees because what you have to recognize is when Trump got in the first time, it was the deep state that refused to allow him to carry out the agenda. And we could get into all the details on that, but it was literally an abject refusal and sabotage. I mean, borderly illegal and unconstitutional. So I'd fire 50,000 people right off the rip and replace it with loyal patriots.

2:52:55 There are plenty of smart people in America. You don't need to find these left-wing dirtbags in Washington, D.C., these, like I said, Lisa Page, Peter Strock types. You find good people to run the government. That's number one. Number two, you build the wall. I mean, there's millions of people pouring in every day. That's the biggest national security threat nobody talks about. We don't even know who these people are. We don't even know how many people are coming in. How could we? It's 20, 30,000 a day. It's 300,000 in a given month. So you got to get the military on the border and you got to get them to build a wall not an 18-foot fence with a 5-foot climbing plate needed a 30-foot concrete wall 1,000 miles at least possibly 2,000. That's day one that's day two.

2:53:36 Day number three, you need to stop the war in Ukraine immediately. They lost. You need to sacrifice those four eastern oblasts that have already seceded and been annexed by Russia. You need to agree that Ukraine will never join NATO and find a way that Ukraine could be a buffer state like it had been for the past 30 years. Then you try to pry Russia away from China. The nightmare coalition in the Bismarck terminology is Russia and China. It didn't have to be like that. As a matter of fact, it shouldn't have been like that. China and Russia- Well, that's right. Nixon tried to split those two. That is the nightmare equation. Since you mentioned it, here's clip 21. Illegal scaling the San Diego, California border and the Border Patrol is high-fiving them and then they tried to arrest the press. Here it is.

CHAPTER 44 / 49 Discussion

Border Security, Population Transfer from Gaza

The U.S. border remains a primary national security threat, with thousands of unidentified individuals crossing daily while citizens face intrusive TSA screenings. There are reports that the Biden administration and Israeli politicians are discussing the transfer of a million Gazan refugees to the United States. This is viewed as a "dumping" policy intended to further balkanize and divide the American social fabric.

border wall· san diego· tsa· gaza refugees· balkanization

2:54:27 I mean folks, you get your balls gripped to fly and we're all being watched for the IRS. But the illegal aliens just pour across and I'm not even against these people individually, but I'm against them as a weapon being used against us. Absolutely. Well, you go to the TSA, they grab your balls, you know, they put you through that machine where they could see it naked and then these people, they just walk right through. I mean, you can't bring a 10 ounce bottle of shampoo on an airplane. Oh, they've got me on a list. I went to Hawaii a few months ago with a family. They grabbed my balls going there and coming back. I'm on a list like, oh, hi, Alex, we're a lister. Sorry, I do this. And literally, I always have some dude literally grabbing me. Like my whole life, no dudes have grabbed me until I fly on the TSA. But the border's wide open, Nick.

2:55:09 That's right. It's an empire of, it's a total joke. The emperor has no clothes and it's a completely lawless country. So I mean, that's something that you got to take care of day one because these people are pouring in. They could be Chinese spies. They could be terrorists. We don't even know. And at the minimum, if you're lucky, they're just regular old, like illiterate people. And not to, I don't mean to attack them personally, but These are people that really don't bring anything to the table economically. The best you could hope for. If they don't have completely malign intentions, they're just somebody that's been walking through the desert probably without a shower. Look at El Salvador. They're paying for scientists to come there.

2:55:50 That's right. They're paying for scientists, artists, all kinds of people. That's called enriching your country. But that's because they have a leader that puts their country first. They have a strong leader with a popular mandate to grow the country's economy and try to create a better future. And that is really what MAGA is about, make America great again. It's this idea that we can acknowledge our country is not as good as it used to be. We can do something about that. It doesn't have to be this way. It's a lack of political will. The government can change everything. And by the way, we can take people from Africa and the Middle East and Eastern Europe, but we want the best.

2:56:28 Certainly. Well, and in a small number. We're taking in millions of people every year and they're not the best. In fact, they're the worst. I mean, these are people that are literally being dumped in. They're getting, and Trump was right when he said it, they're sending these people, they're emptying their jails, they're emptying the people that they can't take care of into our country so that we pay to educate them and pay for their hospital. They're dumping on us. It's a dumping ground for their exports. That's why I said, that's my next question. Netanyahu, three months ago the document came out, now Biden said it two weeks ago, they want to bring a million refugees to Gaza here. Feel sorry for them, fine, but if Israel says they're so deadly, they can't take them. I said, that's Netanyahu using America as a toilet.

2:57:12 That is, I think, the aspect that nobody's talking about. There were two Israeli politicians in The Wall Street Journal a few months ago, and they said that America has to open its doors to the refugees. It's like, OK, so they're not good enough for Israel, they're not good enough for Gaza, they're not good enough for the Sinai, but they're coming to a town near you, they're coming to Peoria, Illinois, they're coming to Boston, they're coming to Little Rock. It's totally ridiculous, but that is the plan. It's a population transfer and just like in Syria or Iraq or Afghanistan, or even Libya for that matter, they want to throw them into our country. But let's just say it, the Israeli lobby predominantly loves balkanization and they love a bunch of new Democrats, a bunch of Ilhan Omar's. And so they're going to dump that here and then use it to divide us just like Netanyahu

2:58:02 predecessors created Hamas to divide Palestine. It's the same deal. It's 100% on the money. It's what they're doing over there, it's what they're doing over here, it's what they're doing in Europe. It's classic divide and conquer because people are easier to rule when there are no ties that bind, when there's no social fabric. If everybody comes here, and I'm totally with you, we don't hate the people, we just can't have a country that's completely incoherent and incomprehensible. We need to have a social fabric, we need to have common values. How about a common language for starters? And we don't need the world to dump all of their problems into our country. Let Israel take care of them. Let El Salvador or Guatemala take care of them. We have enough problems as it is. I think everybody recognizes that. Exactly. We're sick of being told we got to bend over to anybody. I don't care who it is, Israel, anybody. We'll be right back with Nick J. Fuentes. Stay with us. Nick Fuentes, let's talk.

CHAPTER 45 / 49 Discussion

Pro-Human Future, Demographic Realities

The future is predicted to belong to religious and conservative populations who maintain high fertility rates, while the "globalist elite" fail to reproduce. Critics label the transhumanist agenda of figures like Harari and Bill Gates as a form of modern eugenics. The host emphasizes a "pro-human" mission that seeks to preserve traditional family structures and human agency against technological subversion.

fertility rates· demographics· yuval noah harari· bill gates· eugenics

2:59:05 GMO, transhumanism, poison shots, UN treaties, world government because I see a lot of the great work. I'm not saying you, but it seems like a lot of your supporters are a one track mind on one issue and one issue alone. And to me, I want to sell people on a pro human future like Elon Musk is doing, and I'm not doing that to critique you or say you're wrong. I'm saying this is where I come from. This is what I actually believe. There's no wizards telling me what to do. Sometimes I wish there was. I am a pro human. I'm not saying you, but it seems like a lot of your supporters are a one track mind on one issue and one issue alone. And to me, I want to sell people on a pro human future like Elon Musk is doing. And I'm not doing that to critique you or say you're wrong. I'm saying this is where I come from. This is what I actually believe. There's no wizards telling me what to do. Sometimes I wish there was. I am a pro human. I'm not saying you, but it seems like a lot of your supporters are a one I am literally trying to fight for human future. I have four children. You know, you saw that clip from like 28 years ago we just played, you know, where I was talking about, you know, people being trendy and not caring. You care. That's a good thing. People have their free speech. I support that. So covering the waterfront, transhumanism, the UN treaty, all that, you've all known Harari, the future is not human. I say BS.

3:00:07 I totally agree. I think you're right. The future does belong to humanity. Just look at the fertility rates. And we hit this on one of the previous segments. These people like Hariri, they're not having kids. I don't know about him in particular, but these trendies, as you said in that clip, these leftists, these liberals, people that took the vax, I mean, if they're even alive, people are dropping like flies because of the vaccine they just pulled AstraZeneca, which was one of the... Yeah, no, Hariri's not having any kids. He's doing something else. That's right. Yeah, they're all doing some pretty strange things. No, but the future belongs to the people that show up and intergenerationally, the people that show up are the people that are having kids. People like you, people like Elon Trump. Hopefully me one day, I don't have kids right now. But no, I think it's a very bright future for the

3:00:56 people like us because we're the ones that are going out there and forming the families. Not me in particular, not yet, but people that share our views. We're the ones that are going out there and forming the families and having the kids and the kids are the ones that grow up and they are going to be the humanity of the future. Consequently, population is always getting more religious. It's always getting more conservative. It's always getting more pro-human just by a kind of interesting new selection bias, which has resulted from modernity. So I totally agree. This is not, the fight is far from over. But it does all come down to, as you said, this full spectrum of issues. Everything that's getting in the way is coming from the globalists. It's the vaccines, it's the poison, GMO foods, it's things like birth control. I would contend it's even fundamentally built into modernity. It's the fact that women are deferring childbirth all the

3:01:50 the time the the average age at which women are having children is always going up and the higher that it goes to lower the fertility rate. So let's just get the elephant in the room out in the open because you're being nicer on the show. I'm not afraid of going anywhere because like 80% of people in Israel are against Netanyahu. I just want to give Jews an opportunity to come in. I want to give Germans, Christians, Muslims, anybody but Netanyahu did say he uses Israel as guinea pigs. And if you do look at Borla, and if you do look at Larry Fink and the CEOs, they are predominantly Jewish. The leaders of the Communist Revolution, they're predominantly Jewish. And we've got great folks like the people that put out these major conservative universities like PragerU, they admit that. There's also a lot of great people that would be Jewish that are fighting that.

3:02:42 I wonder where that paradigm is where you have so many of the transhumanists like you all know, Harari and others that are with Bill Gates. Sounds like a eugenicist Nazi to me and on that paradigm because when I try to oppose globalism or Yovano Harari, I got a New York Times article how many Semitic I didn't really make a focus on him being Jewish saying it's a post-human world to say the future is not human. That sounds beyond Hitler. Hitler said it's only Aryan and slaves under it, which I don't agree with. But then when somebody says you're all dead, you're all scum, you're all trash, I have a real problem with that.

CHAPTER 46 / 49 Discussion

Religious Dichotomy, Christianity and Judaism

Nick Fuentes discusses his Catholic worldview, arguing that the rejection of Jesus Christ by rabbinical Judaism creates a fundamental religious dichotomy. He critiques the current leadership of Pope Francis as being aligned with globalist and communist ideologies. Despite these theological differences, the discussion acknowledges the historical significance and intelligence of the Jewish people.

catholicism· jesus christ· rabbinical judaism· magisterium· pope francis

3:03:19 How do you square that up? Well, I think that religion is fundamental. And if I talk a lot about Jewish people, it's because I am fundamentally motivated more than anything by the mission to evangelize people into the Christian religion. For me in particular, that's a Catholic church. So I don't have this view of, I don't have an indifferentist view of God that, you know, everybody's out there worshiping the same God. I think there's one Trinitarian God with a very specific, particular nature. I think that one of those persons of God became incarnate in man. His name was Jesus Christ. He was put on the cross. He founded a church. Now, the reason I say all that stuff is because, of course, the Jewish people rejected him. And the Jewish people, in rejecting him, in rejecting this Messiah that they were to bear, and a lot of the Jews, of course, the early Christian community was mostly Jewish people who then became Christians. But those Jews that persisted without accepting Jesus Christ

3:04:18 They kind of formed this new religion, this rabbinical Judaism, Maimonides is a part of it. There's a very dense and complicated history. And throughout history, you see them show up at the beginning of all of these evil movements like the Kabbalah, like the Illuminati. You see them at the founding of really the Enlightenment with Baruch Spinoza. And you see them popping up all over the place. And I don't think that's a coincidence. I think that there's a very clear kind of dichotomy set up from a religious point of view between Christians and Jews. Revelation talks very precisely about a synagogue of Satan. I think that Jews being the only religion that say that Jesus is burning in hell, being the only religion that actually hates Jesus, I think that's extremely relevant. Sure, but let's back off from that because I want to have a real discussion here. And I agree with what you're saying, that's true.

3:05:11 It's the Jews came up with Abrahamic religions. I mean, there's something special about the Jews even before Jesus, King David, King Solomon, all that. What do you think it is about the Jews? I mean, 3,000 years ago they were a big deal. I mean, let's recognize there's something going on there. Well, God chose them to bear the Savior. God chose Adam and Eve, and God chose Noah, and God chose Abraham, and so they were raised up. So exactly, as much as I'm mad at what some of them are doing, I respect What they came from. You see the difference? Is that I don't hate them, though I can fear what some of them are doing. I'm legitimately trying to get them not destroy themselves and all of us at the same time. Along with every other group that's doing this. Does that make sense? Absolutely. Well, and I don't hate them either. And I will give you a little love speech.

3:05:59 I think the Jews are actually extremely intelligent. I know a lot of them and I actually respect a lot of them immensely. I mean, you could say that on the one hand, and to their credit, they are the author of a lot of bad things. They also are the author of a lot of good things. They make good movies, they make good music, they're funny. A lot of them are intelligent. I have immense respect even for the ones I disagree with, even for a guy like Shapiro. I don't like him. I think he's a hard worker. And I can say that about a lot of them. So it really doesn't come from a place of hatred, but it does come from a place that they do practice a different religion. It comes from a place of your independence saying you're who you are. So let me ask you this. I know a lot of Catholics, great people, love them all. Catholic Church is ancient, it's gonna be corrupt like any old powerful group, no matter who it is. Let's just, US government, you know, is old, it's powerful, it's corrupt. That's where I'm at, like, I don't blame Jews, their system's old and corrupt, they're old and corrupt, like America or China, Xi Jinping. I mean, I love the Chinese people.

3:06:52 But looking at this, take the Catholic Church, take Pope Benedict. I mean, Pope John Paul II, man, I read everything he said, I agree with it. I'm not a Catholic, this guy's anti-communist, pro-family. This is good. Okay, vicar of Christ. You look at the next guy, well, and then this new guy is like a communist for world government. So what do you say about Benedict? Well, I would say it's in what you said moments ago. The Catholic Church is a human institution on earth and Catholics have a very specific doctrine that they say that there are only certain circumstances under which the Pope is speaking infallibly when he's actually protected from the throne. Exactly right. And there have been popes throughout history that were far worse than Pope Francis that turned the Vatican into a brothel. Benedict was the last, you're right, it's Francis, I'm sorry.

3:07:45 No, no, but I mean, you could say that about, there are a lot of popes that were imperfect or weren't great or whatever, but we believe in the magisterium. We believe that the teaching has been uncorrupted and protected from error. And you're right. I mean, just every human being is going to be fallible. Every human being is going to be a sinner, but we can't be indifferent to the doctrine. Christians worship the real God, non-Christians don't. And that doesn't mean that we don't have things in common with them. It doesn't mean that we should not try to achieve mutual understanding. It doesn't mean that we should hate them or not. So you don't think Jews that were given this and brought forward the three Abrahamic religions, you don't think that on average they're worshiping the same God?

CHAPTER 47 / 49 Discussion

Global War on Christians, No-Fly List Experience

The United Nations has noted record-level attacks on Christians globally, which is attributed to the fact that believers cannot be easily controlled by worldly powers. Nick Fuentes recounts his experience being placed on a federal no-fly list and the subsequent legal battle led by attorney Norm Pattis to have him removed. This "Kafka-esque" treatment is presented as the price for refusing to submit to the established system.

christianity· antichrist· no-fly list· norm pattis· fbi

3:08:26 No, I think they're all going to hell because they don't worship Jesus. And I don't like that. I wish they would worship Jesus. But it's very clear that the new body of Christ, or rather the new people of God, the new chosen is the body of Christ. It's the church. Christ came to fulfill the old commandments. And so now the chosen people are the Christians, the people that partake in the sacrifice with the Eucharist. So no, I don't believe. But there's definitely a UN global war on Christians. The UN admits it's record-level attacks on Christians. Why do you think that is? I think it's because Christians, because they have belief in God, cannot be controlled by worldly powers.

3:09:06 Of course, global government fears religion that they can't control. Of course, they fear it's just no different than the devil who thinks that he controls the world, who offered Jesus control over the world if only Jesus would bow and worship at his feet. It's really that same frustration that the devil had. Jesus would not submit to him. Christians will not submit to the Antichrist New World Order system. That's because we worship God. the and be their slave. I can't physically do it, Nick. That's why when I get criticized for it, it makes me mad because I may be temporarily distorted through rose-colored dark leash, but I am trying to be a good person. I'm trying to tell the truth.

3:10:04 I know, and I know that and we know that. I mean, everyone that supports me, even when we disagree with you, we all recognize that you are the archetype. You created this whole landscape and you couldn't have done that if you were a sellout. I mean, you're such a talented person. You'd be at CNN. You'd be making, you would be doing, I mean, I know you make a lot of money now, but you'd be doing totally different things than what you've been doing for all these years. So I don't think, even in spite of the disagreements, I don't think there's anybody that doesn't respect what you've been doing and the kind of information that you bring. It's not about me, Nick, and I appreciate that, but I've been with Roger Ailes, offered the weekend show to have the weeknight show and the book deal on the $20 million a year 15 years ago, and I've been in Hollywood. We'll give you all the top roles. I thought, well, I thought you put me in a few movies because you like me. You called me. You want me to sell out. That happened. So I can tell people that's a very— Skype just broke up. That is a very strong point for people

3:10:58 is that the system literally has tried to buy me off. Henry Kissinger had the head of his Rothkopf, the head of his group, And that was an on record meeting, that's why I tell it. If I have an off record meeting, I don't tell the story. Literally tried to buy me off. It's not about me with them trying to buy me off. They literally did that, folks. They literally have tried to get me to sign on and serve them. And that's the whole thing. People need to know how incredibly real all of this is. I mean, Satan is real, God is real. The New World Order is a real thing coming in, shutting off the farms, shutting off the resources, taking over society, doing all of this. This is actually happening. We're still trying to get Nick reconnected. Just text him, we'll do phone if you need to, guys. You have his phone number. All right, we're gonna get back on. So all I'm trying to say is, when I tell you those stories about them trying to get me to work for them,

3:11:58 It isn't to impress you, it's to explain I know how real this is because I've had them try to buy me off. Henry Kissinger in front of my producer, the oldest employee here, 20 years, John Harmon, and they were so dumb in front of him, they said, come to New York, Henry Kissinger wants to hire you, you're gonna do all this. So I can tell people this is real. Nikki got cut off, go ahead and comment on that, sorry. Yeah, sorry about that technical glitch. No, I absolutely agree with you. And I think that, as I was just saying before I got cut off there, that you would have been in a very different place because you would have compromised. That's what everybody does. I think that everybody finds success outside the system and then they're faced with a choice. It's the same choice I was faced with. You can either be co-opted and you can become a part of the system and actually serve the system. It's not even about some kind of

3:12:48 It's about actually then going and working for the system, which is what so many people do. That's a definition of being co-opted. And that's why you've remained independent, which is a far greater struggle. It's why you've been subject to these lawsuits. It's the same thing that happened to me. It's why I've been investigated. It's why I've been censored from everything and had to deal with so much nonsense. And by the way, I know that's real because I got you the lawyer who went and the feds admitted it and took you off it after a year of lawsuits. I mean, that was real. You were on a no-fly list. That's right. Yeah, when it actually happened, some people were skeptical. They said, where's the proof? It's like, well, they don't actually like call you on the phone and say, hello, you are on the no-fly list. They just do it. It's totally Kafka-esque. But you showed video at the airport over and over again. You know, you can't fly, sir.

3:13:36 That's right, yeah, they picked up the phone and they said, yeah, yeah, yada, yada, no fly list. I said, what? No fly list? They said, oh, never mind, because you're actually not supposed to say. But you're right, and you generously referred me to Norm Pannis, who helped work through that case. And eventually, they took me off the list. I was on the quad S for a long time, major flight restriction. I'm now off that as well. But that's just an example of the kind of things that they put you through that if you don't bow down and submit and then go and put the 666 on your forehead and go to work for them, that's the kind of rigmarole they put you through. And it sucks and it's not fair. It makes life harder. But, you know, we have a cross to bear. So let's say something nice about Israel, like the Chinese people under under control of Xi Jinping.

CHAPTER 48 / 49 Discussion

National Identity, Benefits of Fatherhood

The discussion highlights Israel's high fertility rate and strong sense of national identity as qualities that America should emulate. The host encourages Fuentes to start a family, describing fatherhood as a "next level" experience that opens up deep psychological archetypes and a greater commitment to building civilization. Fuentes expresses a desire to eventually start a large Catholic family.

national identity· fertility· fatherhood· carl jung· archetypes

3:14:20 Netanyahu's got like 20% approval rating. They have riots trying to get rid of him. All I want is open a big tent up to Christians, Muslims, Jews, agnostics, Catholics, Buddhists, Hindus, just let's be anti-New World Order. Let's be anti-CBDC. You get my thing as I'm just trying to say these are the policies I'm against. I'm not going to list a group to it. Sure, there's groups behind it. You get where I'm coming from? I absolutely get where you're coming from on that. And to say something nice about Israel, I think they're very technologically sophisticated. I think they have a strong sense of national identity. It's something that we can learn from them. They have a strong, they're the only modern country with a high fertility rate, with an above replacement fertility rate for the religious and non-religious people. So clearly they're doing something right. And so I just, I guess to put it succinctly, I wish America had the same problem

3:15:11 Exactly. I'm like, instead of being envious, how about we outperform? And I want to do that. It's just that, uh, when are you going to get a lovely lady and start having some kids? It's the best thing ever, brother. You're a good looking guy. Come on. You ain't got some girl you're ready to marry. Oh, I'm going to get serious soon. You know, I'm just, uh, I'm really focused on what I'm doing and you know me when you were my age, you were a Chad, you were in the gym, you were muscular. I'm kind of like a little autistic. I have a little more trouble. I mean, you're like the boomer dad. I'm like the autistic zoomer kid. It's a generational thing. I was sure you could get a lot of girls, my friend. I wouldn't get yourself down there. One of these days, one of these days I'm going to start a big Catholic family and you know, all our kids will be hanging out fighting the new world order. You know the Godfather, he says, he's spending time with your family.

3:16:07 And he says, yeah, he goes, because a man's not a man once he spent time with his family. I'm telling you, it's the best thing ever. That's right. That was you, Elon Trump, the family men. You're going to go next level, man. When you've got like three or four kids running around, it's like something clicks. It's crazy. I don't know how to describe it. It's like have children. Like Elon says, it is like next level, man. You're like, And now I'm 50 and now I'm thinking about everybody, literally, I'm some loving good guy. Now I think about society and culture. I want to build civilization. I want to build, I want to help people. It's like become the elder. You're already a really smart guy, but when you have children and become the elder, it's the next level.

3:16:48 Yeah, you are the elder. You do have this kind of mature wisdom. I think everybody has to respect that. You've been around the block. And it will happen for me maybe in the next five years or so. I've just been caught up. I wasn't saying I'm the grandpa, but I'm saying get the woman, go through the hell, have the children. If you think you're smart now, the day that first daughter or son comes out of your wife and you're in the hospital, you're going to get hit. and all this stuff goes and opens up and you're like, whoa, it's the archetypes of Carl Young. It opens all this archetypal energy is what I'm trying to say. And I want to see you when you're a father because that is going to be the next level. All right, we got five minutes left. You got the floor. I've been interrupting Nick Fuentes. What else is on your radar? Well,

CHAPTER 49 / 49 Discussion

Vice Presidential Race, J.D. Vance Critique

Nick Fuentes critiques Senator J.D. Vance as a potential vice presidential pick for Donald Trump, citing Vance's past opposition to Trump and ties to Peter Thiel and Palantir. He argues that the VP will have extraordinary power over federal hiring and must be a true "America First" loyalist. The segment concludes with a call to win key swing states like Michigan, Arizona, and Georgia to secure the country's future.

j.d. vance· peter thiel· palantir· vice president· 2024 election

3:17:40 I guess the big thing that's on my radar, not to open up a whole new can of worms or anything, but I'm really looking at this vice presidential race. Oh yeah, you mentioned Trump and we'll do a little bit in the next hour. They gotta go, you got a big secret mission. But yeah, talk about the presidential race, talk about, you see, earlier, before we went live, you want to talk about Trump and the trials. Go ahead. Yes, so we have this big race now for who's going to be the vice president. And I hinted at this a little bit. He asked me what I'd do when I was president. This is what they're planning to do if Trump wins again, which is this Schedule F reclassification of 50,000 federal employees. And there's all sorts of projects right now, American Moment, Project 2025, a number of others. And they're trying to put together the personnel that will fill up the next administration.

3:18:27 It seems that whoever will be the vice president could have extraordinary power over those hiring and firing personnel decisions. So it's actually a much bigger deal than people realize. People say, you know, vice president, what do they even do? You know, how is that even important? But, you know, Trump is, I love Trump, but he's getting up there in age, and I think that he's a delegator. He's a businessman. In the last administration, unfortunately, he delegated a lot to Jared Kushner. In this administration, I think he'll be delegating a lot to the vice president. All signs point to this Senator J.D. Vance from Ohio, and I gotta be, just like you and me were the first ones to call out the Red Mirage in 2020, once again, we're gonna break it on InfoWars. I feel like the big thing that I'm worried about, to kinda call it out, is J.D. Vance becoming the VP. This guy's bad news. He was against Trump in 16, he endorsed Evan McMullin, he was with American Enterprise Institute, which nothing good ever comes out of there.

3:19:23 I mean, and not to mention the guys totally with Peter Thiel and the guys totally in bed with Palantir and that whole Straussian, very disturbing thing. So I'm going to be putting a lot of content out about this on my show and on Twitter and kind of raising awareness for it. But I really think that we, we, people like you and I, and the listeners need to start to articulate what we want from Trump, because I feel like in many ways the first term was a missed opportunity. I know you were frustrated with it. Many people were. We have to make sure, because we may get a second chance. We can't mess it up again, because we're not going to get a third roll of the dice. This second term, there's a lot riding on it. We got to get it right. And that's why people like us got to get organized to start to work. And I know you and I are. But

3:20:08 We really got to start to articulate what we want from Trump. And I've been saying even to go to the rallies and, you know, even if we could get chants going and things like that or talk about, get the message out on social media, we got to start to say what we want from the second term because we didn't really walk away with the time. And, you know, and I recognize there were reasons for that, but we can't really afford to fumble at a second time and we'll have a unique opportunity. So I'm really looking forward to 2024. We got to win in Michigan. We got to win in Arizona. We got to win in Georgia. Those are must-win presidential states. We also got to promulgate the message of what 2024 is going to be about. It's got to be about building the wall. It's got to be about drilling oil. It's got to be about averting World War III.

3:20:52 And it's got fundamentally to be about completely subverting or uprooting the deep state and all that entrenched power that's in the swamp. Because if Trump goes in there and doesn't change that like he did in the first term, he will come and go and there will be no evidence that he was ever president. Mark my words. because those are the people, it's not the people that write the laws or pass the laws, it's those bureaucrats that enforce the laws. They're the ones interpreting and applying it every day. If you leave those people and it's the same revolving door for 30 years, they're the ones that are going to determine the future of America. Nick Fuentes, people follow you on Rumble, how do they do it?

3:21:31 Rumble.com slash Nick Chaffe Wentes. I'm live there Monday through Friday, so you can subscribe and like the videos there. I do want to show great, great two hours. Thanks for the time. Be safe. Can't wait to hear what's happening next. Thank you so much. Owen Troy takes over. Thank you. Owen Troy takes over now. Stay with us. Infowars.com forward slash show. Railogz Jones on Twitter. While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Visit InfoWars.com forward slash show and share the link today. This is so, so important. Please remember, ladies and gentlemen, we're listed, supported your purchases at InfoWars.com allow this powerful game changing information on the air and they're really great products. InfoWarsStore.com

3:22:28 a little bit more is coming in a few weeks, so that's a bummer. But Nitric Boost cleans out your blood, so good for your heart, your brain, everything. It is back in stock 40% off. There is of course a lot of other great products like the Ultimate Fish Oil, highest grade of fish oil at a great price. So good for your whole body, so good for your brain, so good for your cardiovascular system, so good for your sleep. It's available as well at InfoWarsStore.com or by calling toll free 888-253-3139. While you're there, get 10 hour clean energy that is amazing. Turbo force at info war store.com as well. Get a copy of one of my two newest books The Great Reset in the War for the World and the newest one the Great Awakening the plan to defeat the globalists and launch the next great Renaissance