Monday, 2 January 2023

Alex Jones Enters 2023 With Vital Message: “We Are Winning!” - FULL SHOW 1/2/23

A defiant New Year broadcast tackles the Jeff Younger custody battle, the looming commercial real estate collapse, and the escalating GOP civil war over the Speakership.

By The Alex Jones Show | 2h 55m listen | 41 chapters
Alex Jones Enters 2023 With Vital Message: “We Are Winning!” - FULL SHOW 1/2/23 cover

About this episode

Alex Jones delivers a defiant 2023 New Year address claiming total vindication for vaccine skeptics as criminal investigations into medical officials launch in Florida and Germany. Anthony Fauci faces renewed scrutiny following the release of the Twitter Files, with Jones characterizing the former NIAID director as a modern-day Joseph Mengele. The broadcast frames the continued operation of InfoWars as a strategic victory against deep state legal pressures and corporate censorship.

Jeff Younger joins the studio to detail the Texas Supreme Court’s refusal to block his ex-wife from moving their son to California for gender transition treatments. Younger identifies Judge Mary Brown as a key figure in stripping his parental rights and warns that California Senate Bill 107 creates a transgender sanctuary that nullifies out-of-state subpoenas. Meanwhile, Gerald Celente forecasts a 2023 economic calamity driven by a commercial real estate bust and the end of cheap money, while criticizing Mitch McConnell and Joe Biden for their $1.7 trillion infrastructure celebration in Kentucky.

Gerald Celente invokes St. Thomas Aquinas to discuss the morality of anger against a political establishment he describes as a freak show leading the world toward nuclear annihilation. The segment highlights the absurdity of FEMA nuclear preparedness advice and mocks the Secret Service paranoia allegedly displayed by Joe Biden at his Delaware estate. Alex Jones concludes with an update on his personal bankruptcy, framing his legal battles as a final stand for the First Amendment.


CHAPTER 01 / 41 Discussion

InfoWars 2023 New Year Broadcast Launch

Owen Shruer opens the 2023 broadcast year from the Infowars studios, framing the network's continued existence as a victory against the deep state and globalist agendas. He announces a loaded transmission featuring a New Year's message from Alex Jones and upcoming guests including Gerald Celente and Jeff Younger. The segment emphasizes the resilience of the platform despite legal and corporate pressures.

infowars· alex jones· owen shruer· deep state· globalists

00:00 Watch the American Journal weekday mornings 8 to 11 central at band dot video live from the Infowars.com studios It's Alex Jones The silent majority is no longer silent. This is the war room with Owen Schreuer Yes, ladies and gentlemen It is the Alex Jones Show. It is Infowars.com, live on air in the year 2023. So why don't you suck on that globalists? Why don't you suck on that deep state? 2023, another

00:52 Another year on air, another year of victory. Another year where we refuse to give up, we refuse to back down, and we refuse to be slaves in a corporate world government. Leading the charge against it is us. You, me, the crew, Alex Jones, the great guests, everybody. That's why we are here. And even though I don't get too hyped about the flipping of the calendar, another sunrise, another sunset. It does represent new potential, it does represent new beginnings, and it offers sometimes hope in times of treachery. And isn't that what we've been going through? All the treacherous treatment by our government. Now let me just say, as a quick programming note here, we have an absolutely loaded transmission. Now Alex Jones is joining us on the other side of this break.

01:54 It is, after all, the Alex Jones show and we will be hearing a message from Alex on the other side of this break and throughout the day, specifically a New Year's themed message. Because after all, do you think the deep state, the globalists, the Democrats, the National Crime Syndicate with big tech and the Democrat Party, do you think they had Infowars still being on the air as part of their problems to deal with in the year 2023? No, I think they thought we'd be shut down a long time ago. But thanks to you in the audience, thanks to God above, we are still here. Now having said that,

CHAPTER 02 / 41 Discussion

Jeff Younger Texas Supreme Court Case Preview

Jeff Younger is introduced as an in-studio guest to discuss a recent Texas Supreme Court decision regarding his son's transition. The discussion characterizes the "trans kid agenda" as child abuse and genital mutilation, focusing on the legal battle to prevent chemical and physical alterations of children. Younger will explain the court's refusal to grant him control over his child's medical path.

jeff younger· texas supreme court· trans kids· hormone therapy· child abuse

02:43 We are going to be covering a ton of news today. I mean, there is just so much news today that I'm going to be here for seven hours covering all of it and I will not be short of news to cover. I will be able to fill seven hours easily. And of course, the great Jaled Cilente is going to be joining us as well. He'll be hosting the fourth hour of the Alex Jones Show. We have an in-studio guest today and that is Jeff Younger. And we've been following this story here in Texas for years now. where the Texas Supreme Court is basically saying you cannot protect your son, it could be a daughter, but you cannot protect your child from the trans kid agenda and you cannot take control of your child's life when they're still young so that they can't be forced into chemically altering them with hormone therapies

03:50 or even physically altering them with the trans kids surgeries. Now Jeff is gonna be in studio at one o'clock explaining the recent Texas Supreme Court decision. But you wonder, does the idea of trans kids make it through another year? Is that absolute insanity? Does that absolute madness make it through another calendar year? Or is 2023 the year we finally start to swing the pendulum back to common sense? And it's trans kids is recognized for what it is. It's child abuse and it's the complete mutilation is what it is. It's not trans kids. It's child abuse. It's genital mutilation of kids. Does that make it through another calendar year, that absolute insanity? So that's all coming up. But on the other side,

04:52 It's Alex Jones, first New Year's message to the InfoWars audience. And then all the news, all the guests as we here at InfoWars kick off what is set to be another epic year. InfoWars, tomorrow's news today. Welcome to the year 2023, an absolutely critical time for humanity. We are at a juncture

CHAPTER 03 / 41 Discussion

Alex Jones 2023 New Year Message and Vaccine Vindications

Alex Jones delivers a New Year's address claiming total vindication for those who refused the COVID-19 vaccine and warned of side effects like myocarditis and blood clots. He highlights criminal investigations launched in Florida and Germany against medical officials. Jones characterizes Anthony Fauci as "Joseph Mengele 2.0" and calls for redoubled efforts against potential future lockdowns and forced injections.

alex jones· myocarditis· cdc· anthony fauci· florida investigation

05:35 and we are deciding the future course of our species right now. Last year was an incredibly dangerous year obviously with the war starting in Ukraine and the global economy beginning to collapse. But it was also a very powerful year for humanity's understanding of the way the world really works and the mass awakening. And of course, I'm talking about the fact that all of us that refused the shot, all of us that pointed out that it attacks the immune system, all of us that showed the scientific evidence that it was connected to myocarditis and blood clots have been totally vindicated. And now even members of the CDC and NIH and others are coming out and being forced to admit that.

06:14 Now, the sad part about that is they are still moving forward attempting to give these shots to six month olds and up. They're trying to make a mandatory in school. They're trying to make everybody that visits the United States take the shots before they can get here. We're the only country in the world now still doing that. We're the only country in the world that gives these shots to six month olds and up. And they're also trying to give it now to newborns. So we've got a lot of work ahead of us here. when we deal with medical freedom and our bodily autonomy. But regardless, we had major breakthroughs and the whole enemy propaganda system and the federal control of big tech and everything they threw at us was not enough to suppress the truth from getting out. And it's been our viewers and listeners that have been at the very, very tip of the spear with that fight.

07:00 And it's been my broadcast, through the grace of God, was able to have some of these top scientists on first to magnify their voices so that now in the year 2023, we have a real chance of bringing these Joseph Mingala 2.0s, like Anthony Fauci, to justice through the court system and our criminal investigations that have now been launched in Florida. Germany's launching a criminal investigation and a lot more is happening. So I just want to say, I really appreciate all of you out there and the hard work you've done to tell the truth. And I want to encourage you all to redouble your efforts or they're going to try to bring back more forced injections, more lockdowns and more. Again, thank you so much for watching and I'll see you all at infowars.com tomorrow's news today.

CHAPTER 04 / 41 Discussion

Trump versus DeSantis Political Rivalry and Speaker Vote

The political landscape for 2023 is analyzed through the lens of the perceived rivalry between Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis. Criticism is directed at "Trump loyalists" for attacking DeSantis over old videos rather than focusing on the upcoming Speaker of the House vote. The segment argues that the internal GOP debate is being distracted by premature 2024 campaign dynamics.

donald trump· ron desantis· speaker of the house· kevin mccarthy· gop

07:49 But winning does come at a cost, does it not? And we'll discuss what that looks like today. But let me just tell you what we have coming up as far as news coverage is concerned. Again, we are expecting to hear more from Alex before the end of the transmission. I've got a bunch of political news where it appears the narrative or the main plot that the media wants us talking about is and I think there is a general interest there, obviously. And that's this debate between Trump and DeSantis. That's where I saw most of the focus over the holiday season and then leading into today's transmission, Trump, DeSantis, Trump, DeSantis. You've got the Trump loyalists who I think are acting on their own. I mean, I don't know of Trump

08:44 Giving out any commands or operating any of these, we'll call it internet hit teams, to be going after DeSantis, digging into his past, digging into videos from 10, 20 years ago, saying, see, DeSantis is the bad guy. You need to be supporting Trump. I don't think Trump is orchestrating that, but certainly that is the main thrust of the political debate right now, when it should be what's about to happen with the speaker vote tomorrow. So I'm going to be discussing those two things, the Trump-DeSantis issue, and then, which to me is a non-issue right now, it shouldn't even be on the table, it should be what is going to happen with the vote tomorrow for Speaker of the House. Now that has gotten a little nasty behind the scenes, I will tell you. It has gotten nasty behind the scenes. So I'll tell you what's going on with that. So we'll have those political news stories

09:46 covered today as well. And I think what people are going to have to admit to themselves if they've still been in denial about it for all these years, this idea, this concept that somehow self-government has failed and self-government is something of the past, a relic. You can't be trusted. You, a pesky human. You, a little peon. You, a little serf.

CHAPTER 05 / 41 Discussion

Smart Grid Control and Vehicle Kill Switch Legislation

A critique of the "Smart Grid" and the "Internet of Things" suggests that government infrastructure is being built to control personal property, including cars and thermostats. The segment claims that multiple bills have already passed authorizing vehicle kill switches under the guise of climate change and safety. This technological shift is framed as a move toward indentured servitude and the end of self-government.

smart grid· internet of things· kill switch· infrastructure bill· climate change

10:27 You, a little indentured servant, you just can't handle the complexities of life anymore. You can't handle the new technologies. And so we need the government infrastructure built now so that, oh, well, you're not even going to be driving a car in 10 years and you're certainly not going to be traveling. And people are starting to finally scratch their heads and say, hey, why? with these omnibus spending bills and all these other legislative sessions. Why do they keep bringing up these concepts of this smart grid system, the Internet of Things, where now the government has control and they can turn my car off. And now the government has control and they can turn my air conditioning or my heating off. And you know where it goes from here, don't you? It's all smart now. They can get on your phone, they can control your phone.

11:26 They can control your thermostat, they can control your car. They have the new smart locks now too, and the lock on your house is connected to the Internet. They can control that lock. They need to send the feds in, they don't even need to worry about bringing in a battering ram. Just hit the Internet unlock button and then your door's unlocked, they're coming right in. And so people are seeing this and they're hearing it, they're starting to see the bigger picture with the man-made climate change. BS and they're saying well now wait a second. I'm all for saving the planet I'm I want to be a good Samaritan to planet Earth, but now hold on a second I also want to be free and so these stories have been out there forever about the kill switch in the cars and There's probably been four or five

12:23 bills passed that include the kill switch in the cars. So they already have the legislation, it's just a matter of bringing it to practice and they want to normalize it first, they want to get you used to the idea. They don't want you to hop in your car tomorrow, have the government turn it off and then you're like, what the heck? Slowly roll it out, slowly introduce it. It's kind of with the whole, your engine automatically turns off and on now when you stop and start your car. It's obnoxious. It's just this idea that everything that's worked has to be changed. So let's make it work not so well, so that when we change it, people aren't so upset. So we'll be discussing that today. I think the big story for 2023 though,

CHAPTER 06 / 41 Discussion

2023 Economic Collapse and Post-COVID Market Correction

A prediction for 2023 forecasts a severe economic collapse and a "rude awakening" for Americans who expected post-COVID relief. The analysis suggests that the market has yet to fully correct from Biden-era policies, leading to higher energy bills, gas prices, and the loss of middle-class luxuries. The divide between the "haves and have-nots" is expected to widen significantly as savings accounts are depleted.

economic collapse· inflation· biden economy· market correction· grocery prices

13:10 And I'm starting to see the signs of this coming fast. Coming fast. It might take a month, but I think the real story for 2023 is going to be economic collapse and devastation. And people have been treading water financially for so long since COVID. expecting some relief, expecting things to get better. No, actually post COVID and post Biden, the market really still has not corrected itself, folks. I think the market corrects itself in 2023. And if you thought it was bad in 2022, I hate to tell you, it's going to be a lot worse in 2023. It's going to be bad.

13:57 Grocery bills, energy bills, gas prices, that'll be a story in and of itself. That's not gonna be what wallops you. That's not gonna be what wallops you. And some of the luxuries that people have been used to being able to afford, you're not gonna be able to afford them anymore. Subscriptions, memberships, prices are gonna go up, you're gonna cancel them. People are going to sit back and they're going to say, what happened? Five years ago, I was saving money. Five years ago, I had a savings account that I could consistently put money into. I was looking to buy assets, houses, cars, making business investments. That's all gone, folks. And if people think that's going to correct itself and be better in 2023, I'm sorry, you've got another thing coming.

14:59 No, I think 23 is gonna be the year where people realize what's been done to us economically. We have not yet seen the post COVID, post Biden market correction. I think we see it in 2023 and people are in for a rude awakening. That's not to be pessimistic because America's been through worse financially, economically speaking, so we can recover from that. The challenge is going to be getting people to understand why the have-nots or the haves and have-nots have a greater divide between them. Why your grocery bill just keeps going up and up and up and up and up and up. Why your energy bill keeps going up and up and up and up and up. That's another story. I wanna focus on some political news right now. The big debate, the big topic should be the speaker vote tomorrow. And we're not getting enough of that. Instead, we're getting the typical Trump nominating the discussion.

CHAPTER 07 / 41 Discussion

Donald Trump Midterm Loss Blame and Abortion Commentary

Donald Trump is criticized for "flailing" after he blamed the GOP's handling of the abortion issue for 2022 midterm losses. The segment disputes Trump's claim, arguing that the losses were actually due to Mitch McConnell's funding decisions and election irregularities in Maricopa County. Trump's recent social media behavior is characterized as a desperate search for attention following his departure from Twitter.

donald trump· mitch mcconnell· abortion· midterms· gop losses

16:00 And we're having the Trump-DeSantis debate two years ahead of schedule. DeSantis hasn't even announced that he's running. And so I don't think, at least I don't have any direct knowledge of Trump launching this initiative for Trump's top loyalists to be going after Ron DeSantis so hardcore right now. But I don't really like it. I'll be honest with you. I don't like it. Because it's ahead of schedule and the real conversation we should be having is Kevin McCarthy or someone else for Speaker of the House and that vote is tomorrow. But here's some of the stuff. So like I said, it's the political commentary that is really dominating right now is Trump versus DeSantis. All the Trump loyalists are out telling you how bad DeSantis is with that, how bad he is with that and this and the other thing.

16:53 Sharing video clips like an interview from like 10 years ago, DeSantis says that Bush was the most inspirational person you've met. It's like, look, see, oh, DeSantis, he can't be trusted. He said he was inspired by Bush. He's doing an interview, a stand-up interview, There was no planning for this. Someone just asked, he doesn't know, you can hear. He's like, boy, that's really tough to say. I don't know, but I mean, I did meet a President Bush, so I guess I'll say President Bush. He's like, see, he can't be trusted. It's like, really? I mean, that's your barometer? Donald Trump who gave money to the Clintons?

17:35 Donald Trump who was at events with Epstein and Maxwell again, I'm not I don't sit here and say oh look Donald Trump gave money to the Clintons. Look Donald Trump was with Max well and Epstein no cuz it's ridiculous. I'm about policy I'm about results, but oh this this hemming and hawing from the Trump loyalists just has me sick Oh my gosh, DeSantis said he was inspired by Bush. Oh, oh, oh, that's That's how purists you are now. Oh, I see Trump supporters are purists now, okay But that's neither here nor there. That's just the political commentary that I hope Trump is not unintentionally distracting from the real debate, which is who should be the Speaker of the House. I don't see this coming from Trump, but maybe it is Trump. Maybe Trump is telling people, go out and attack DeSantis. Go out and help me, do something for me. My campaign is dying before it's even off the ground. And to me, I see Trump reeling right now, I have to be honest.

18:31 Trump, it wasn't my fault. Trump blames GOP's handling of abortion for midterm losses. To me, this is just Trump flailing. And I don't know what it is. I don't know if it's the social media censorship that has him upset because he doesn't get near the reaction or response from a truth social post than he did on Twitter. I don't know if he's just desperate for air and he's just dying for TV interviews or what. I just don't understand this at all. It just seems like he's flailing, quite frankly, from my perspective. But this is just ludicrous because Donald, you even know that this is not completely accurate. Here was the statement. It wasn't my fault that the Republicans didn't live up to expectations in the midterms. It was the abortion issue

19:22 Poorly handled by many Republicans, especially those that firmly insisted on no exceptions, even in the case of rape, incest, or life of the mother that lost large numbers of voters. Why is he even offering this commentary right now? Again, to me, it's just a guy flailing, desperate for attention almost. The people that pushed so hard for decades against abortion got their wish from the US Supreme Court And then just plain disappeared, not to be seen again, plus Mitch McConnell's stupid money. No, see Trump, that's what it is. You got screwed by Mitch McConnell and we all know what happened in Maricopa County and we all know what happened in Georgia, not just in the last midterm elections, but in 2020 as well. So to sit here now and say, oh, see, this is like the Republicans blaming you.

CHAPTER 08 / 41 Discussion

Kevin McCarthy Speakership Opposition and GOP Internal Conflict

The battle for the House Speakership intensifies as conservative holdouts like Dan Bishop and Anna Paulina Luna challenge Kevin McCarthy. Newt Gingrich's criticism of these holdouts as "kamikazes" is dismissed, with the segment arguing the Republican Party is already "anchored to the bottom of the swamp." Allegations of threats against freshman members who oppose McCarthy are highlighted as evidence of "nastiness" behind the scenes.

kevin mccarthy· dan bishop· newt gingrich· anna paulina luna· house speaker

20:14 This is like the Republicans blaming Trump for the 2022 midterm losses. That's like Trump blaming the abortion issue for the midterm losses. Both are inaccurate, wildly. But there it is, there's your Republican leadership flailing in the wind, flopping around, desperate, desperate for some sort of traction. And then the real debate, which is who should be the Speaker of the House? Now, just moments ago, Dan Bishop, who's one of the good guys in Congress, puts this out, he says, why didn't we get Kevin McCarthy's proposed rules package at least 72 hours in advance? And so that has people concerned that the rules that Kevin McCarthy is going to be enforcing if he becomes Speaker of the House are not going to be what the, I don't know what you would call it, the Trump wing of the Republicans, the America First Republicans, the common sense Republicans, the non-deep state Republicans.

21:21 The anti-establishment Republicans, they want to see those rules. McCarthy still lacks vote to win speakership. At least eight conservatives claim the House requires a radical departure of the status quo. Yeah, that's pretty accurate. But so this is getting a little nasty behind the scenes, I'm gonna tell you. It's getting a little nasty and I'm actually glad, quite frankly. I'm glad that we have Republicans that are taking something that seriously finally and understanding that we are in a life or death battle for the future of this country. So you have Newt Gingrich going on TV, and I like Newt, but I gotta disagree with him here.

22:13 calling those trying to stop McCarthy from becoming the speaker kamikazes will sink the whole Republican Party. Newt loses it over anti McCarthy holdouts. But see, I think that that is hyperbolic because the whole Republican Party has already been sank. Sink the Republican Party. It's at the bottom of the ocean, Newt. What do you mean? How can I sink the Republican Party? It's anchored to the bottom of the deep state. It's anchored to the bottom of the swamp. And I'm gonna believe that Kevin McCarthy is gonna be the one that lifts the Republican Party out of the swamp? Is that a joke? Are you kidding me? No, no, no, no, no, no. Stopping McCarthy from becoming Speaker of the House is not gonna sink the Republican Party. The Republican Party has already been sunk by the likes of Mitch McConnell, who wants McCarthy to be the Speaker.

23:11 Incoming Republican Anna Paulina Luna says House member threatened her for not supporting McCarthy. I'm telling you it's getting nasty and I might know who this is. I'll tell you who I think it is coming up on the other side. But I gotta tell you, if McCarthy gets the Speaker of the House vote tomorrow, I am gonna lose a lot of faith that we're gonna see much change. Yeah, I'm very unmoved. I'm very uninspired. By a 10 year old video of Ron DeSantis talking about Bush, completely uninterested. Means nothing to me. Donald Trump flopping and flailing about saying, abortion is why we lost in the midterms. Give me a break. I'm more disgusted by that than I am of an old DeSantis video.

CHAPTER 09 / 41 Discussion

Ron DeSantis Bush Video and Trump Vaccine Stance

The host dismisses a viral 10-year-old video of Ron DeSantis praising George W. Bush as an irrelevant "off the cuff" moment. Greater concern is expressed regarding Donald Trump's continued support for COVID-19 vaccines. The segment aligns with Matt Gaetz's view that the GOP needs a hardworking speaker rather than a "known loser" like Kevin McCarthy.

ron desantis· george w. bush· andrew callaghan· matt gaetz· vaccines

24:01 Besides, folks, I've done this stuff before. You're at an event, whatever, you do a stand-up interview, it's off the cuff, you're not prepared, you say something, maybe you regret, maybe you didn't mean it, it just, it happens. It's like, they just, this new documentary just came out from Andrew Callaghan, I think is his name, and I've met him before, he's a nice guy, but I wouldn't say he does gotcha interviews, but his interviewing style is a little, it's a little off-putting at times. and they did an interview of me, and it made his new HBO film. And people are like, wow, well look what Troyer said here. He's like, oh, he doesn't look so smart. It's like, yeah, I had just had a 15-hour day, and he comes up and asks me for an interview at 1 o'clock in the morning. Like, yeah, I'm a little out of it at that time. I mean, I was nice enough to give it to him. I thought it was nice enough to even ask, so okay. But that's my point is,

24:53 No, I'm completely unmoved by Ron DeSantis saying he was inspired by George Bush 10 or 15 years ago. It means nothing to me. No, I'm more upset that Donald Trump won't come out against the vaccines that have killed tens of thousands of people and he keeps telling you how great they are. That's more moving to me than an old stand up interview off the cuff from Ron DeSantis. But let's get back to the debate because it shouldn't be about Trump and DeSantis. And quite frankly, if Trump thinks making the debate about him and DeSantis is helping him, he's wrong. The real debate should be who's gonna be the Speaker of the House. Now the problem is it's really only Matt Gaetz or Kevin McCarthy as far as I can tell. But who do you think Anna Paulina Luna, freshman Congresswoman in Florida, is talking about when she says a House member threatened her for not supporting Kevin McCarthy? Now I'm gonna tell you an unpopular opinion here, but I bet it was Marjorie Taylor Greene.

25:52 I bet it was Marjorie Taylor Greene. And let me be clear, I like Marjorie Taylor Greene. I disagree with her on the Kevin McCarthy speakership, but I still like her. I still think she's one of the good guys. There's gonna be people I like that are the good guys in Congress that I'm not gonna agree with all the time on, and that's fine. Matt Gaetz, Americans want an honest and hardworking Speaker of the House, not Kevin McCarthy. Boy, I think that sums it up. I look at it as, why are we gonna go with something that is a known loser. There's no, what is the potential from Kevin McCarthy? There is none. He's already had a position of leadership. He failed us. But that's the problem. If it's McDaniel, McConnell and McCarthy for another two years, nothing will change for you politically with your representation, with your leadership in the Republican Party. Nothing will change. And that's the problem.

27:05 So if I was a betting man, I'd bet you Kev McCarthy becomes speaker tomorrow. However, there is major nastiness behind the scenes. I don't think it's going to be smooth. I think the holdouts are going to continue to hold out and they're going to raise hell. And I hope that they do because The whole argument they're gonna say is, well, now you're sabotaging McCarthy. Now you're sabotaging Republican leadership. What? McCarthy sabotaged himself. Republican leadership sabotaged us. Sabotaging Republican leadership? No, they've done so much for me. What will I do without the Republican leadership of Kevin McCarthy going to bat for me every day? So I don't expect anything to change there.

28:06 And that'll be our first reminder of the deep state is still in control when McCarthy becomes Speaker of the House tomorrow. But the holdouts are gonna continue to hold out. I don't mind this rift in the Republican Party either because it has to happen. Either we're going to get representation from the people, for the people, by the people, or we're gonna continue to get swamp creatures like McConnell and McCarthy. And I'm not interested in that, that does nothing for me. Don't sabotage Republican leadership in the House. Well, it's not gonna make any difference whether I do or don't.

CHAPTER 10 / 41 Discussion

Mitch McConnell and Joe Biden Kentucky Infrastructure Celebration

Mitch McConnell is criticized for hosting Joe Biden at an infrastructure bill celebration in Kentucky immediately after the GOP took the House. The segment mocks Biden for having the $1.7 trillion omnibus bill flown 1,500 miles to the Bahamas for his signature while claiming to fight climate change. McConnell's cooperation with Biden is framed as a betrayal of the American people.

mitch mcconnell· joe biden· kentucky· omnibus bill· climate change

28:48 Except maybe if we do have a holdout, maybe if we do criticize the Republican leadership, maybe if we do make it a miserable ride for Kevin McCarthy, maybe then we could get some change here in the future. Maybe then we could have some leadership that actually reflects what we the voter and we the people want to see reflected in DC. I have no faith in Kevin McCarthy to restore that. Then there's Mitch McConnell. But there's no surprises here. In your face, Mitch McConnell to host Joe Biden at infrastructure bill celebration in Kentucky the day after GOP takes major house victory. So McConnell gonna be rubbing elbows with Biden. That's nice to know where McConnell just wants you to know where he stands.

29:40 And so Biden, I think is still on vacation in the Bahamas. We'll have more news coming up on that later. He had the omnibus bill flown into the Bahamas, 1500 miles. He's saving climate change. He flew a bill 1500 miles to the Bahamas so he could sign it. The only thing missing was Sam Bankman-Fried. But don't worry, the money was laundered. $1.7 trillion signed by Biden supposedly in the Bahamas flown thousands of miles because he's fighting climate change. And he's never been to the southern border either, but he's gonna be in Kentucky rubbing elbows with Mitch McConnell because Mitch McConnell just wants to piss on your face and let you know who he really stands for. And that's not you, the American people, that's Joe Biden and the Democrat Party. And then there is Joe Biden,

CHAPTER 11 / 41 Discussion

Joe Biden Secret Service Relations and Paranoia Claims

A new book claims Joe Biden refuses to speak freely around Secret Service agents because he perceives them as "white southerners" who might leak information. The segment alleges a history of disrespect between the Biden family and their security detail, including claims of inappropriate behavior toward agents' wives. Speculation is raised about what agents might reveal regarding Biden's health and family life at his beachfront property.

joe biden· secret service· white southerners· corruption· diapers

30:30 Now this is not a secret, this has been well known for years, but there's another book coming out about it. New book claims Joe Biden refuses to speak freely around his Secret Service agents because they're white southerners. Paranoid, they'll leak embarrassing information. Well, that's a nice funny shot at white southerners. That I'm sure, I have no doubt that he took, but it really has nothing to do with their skin color. It really has nothing to do with where they're from. And it has everything to do with the fact that Joe Biden is a disgusting creep and a corrupt politician. And it's been well known the disregard or disrespect or disgust even that Secret Service has felt for Biden.

31:18 After they had to cancel parties like birthday parties because the Bidens would show up and grope their wives and girlfriends Yeah, so there's always been an issue with Secret Service and the Biden family. It's not exactly a All-around good relationship, but I think really the concern is that the Secret Service probably knows better than anybody the true state of Joe Biden, but they are loyal Government employees, and I think we could probably all be grateful for that I don't want the Secret Service to stand down just because they don't like the president I want them to keep doing their job even if I can't stand the guy and so they do But you wonder if that dam isn't going to break Don't you don't you wonder again Secret Service workers may be the most loyal in the government but

32:17 You just wonder if something may give, especially if more details start to emerge about potential disrespect that Joe Biden might have towards Secret Service. Maybe one of them decides to give a little behind the scenes on what Joe Biden's life is like. I don't know, trips to the bathroom, The diapers, what happens at his beachfront property when he goes on vacation every weekend. All of the family members that are living at the White House. There's a lot that they could tell. And I don't think Joe and his family would like them telling it. Of course, they're not, but they could and that scares them. All right, I'm gonna get back into the political news here. Owen Troyer hosting the Alex Jones Show, but

CHAPTER 12 / 41 Discussion

Democrat Social Media Regulation and Internet Takeover Plan

Senator Amy Klobuchar's call for social media regulation is interpreted as a plan for total government control over the internet. The segment predicts a major marketing push by the Democrat Party by summer 2023 to normalize censorship under the guise of fighting "misinformation." The "Twitter Files" are cited as evidence that the government has already been illegally running social media operations.

amy klobuchar· elon musk· twitter files· censorship· fbi

38:12 And I'm going to be covering another story on the war room later today regarding this. I think the plan is already in place on how they're going to roll this out. They've already got their marketing plan ready to go. They've already got their celebrity voices and faces ready to go. They've already drummed up all the hatred against Elon Musk. They've already tried to normalize the internet censorship while denying they're engaged in it. Oh, we don't have a department of misinformation and then well, they lied, they did. So this is all about getting government control over the internet and the practical application for your understanding is that there's not going to be free speech anymore on the internet. You're not going to be able to criticize a COVID vaccine. You're not going to be able to report on the origin story of COVID in a lab, which by the way, we've got more evidence on that. Anthony Fauci knew exactly what he was doing. Again, that's coming up later though.

39:15 I do expect probably by this summer, if not the spring, you're gonna see a full-on rolled out plan on the Democrat Party internet takeover. Of course, they'll use the guise of the federal government or the FBI or the White House, whatever it is. No, it's the Democrats and they're running the whole thing. We all know that. The agents of Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum, the agents of the Communist Chinese, And I would expect by summer for sure, if not by spring, you're gonna see this rolled out. They're gonna be doing hearings. They're gonna have internet celebrities telling you why it needs to be like this. They're gonna try to obfuscate the real story and they're gonna say, well, what about internet bullying or what about leaking hacked materials and all this other stuff to distract so that you say, oh yeah, that's a good thing when that's not what this is about at all.

40:14 It's not what this is about at all. It's kind of like with the FBI wanting all this access to spy on you and getting it. And then you had the attack in New York City on New Year's Eve, a radical man running around with a machete. And what happens? It turns out he was on an FBI wanted list and an FBI watch list as a known violent jihadist. And they let him go off and have the attack. who injured three police officers because they're not using the power they've been given to stop criminals. They're going to use the power they're given to stop you. They want to use this power to spy on their enemies and politically destroy and censor their enemies. It's not about stopping crime, it's not about building a stronger union, it's all about control for them. So I will tell you this, I again,

41:11 expect to see something by the spring, definitely by the summer. The Democrats are going to roll out a whole, it's going to be a whole presentation. And they're going to have internet celebrities and they're going to have, it's going to be a huge marketing push. And of course, in the interim, they're going to try to devastate Twitter as much as possible between now and then, because they know that Twitter is going to be the only place that may not obliged by the new government regulations to have the government basically running the company and everybody else be hands-off. And that's ultimately what did happen at Twitter. That's what was upsetting Jack Dorsey. That's what we're finding out in these Twitter files. So the government's already been running the operation. They just want to make it legal now, and they just want to make it the precedent now. But get ready. Get ready for a major push

42:12 for total state control over these social media companies by the end of this calendar year. And it's going to be not your normal political football that they're going to be tossing around and punting around. This is going to be like a Super Bowl halftime show level display wanting you to buy into it thinking it's so great when really it's just propaganda. And now people are realizing this with the omnibus bill where it's like the fourth or fifth time they've done this. Big Brother will watch you drive. Disgusting infrastructure bill. Installs kill switches in all new vehicles. Turns America into a police state. So this is what the government does. They say you can't start, you can't make a new car unless it's electric. You can't make a new car unless it has the auto

CHAPTER 13 / 41 Discussion

Joe Biden Cognitive Decline and Naval Academy Claims

Joe Biden is accused of rapid cognitive deterioration and frequent lying, specifically regarding a claim that he was appointed to the Naval Academy in 1965. The segment points out that Biden graduated from the University of Delaware in 1965, making the appointment impossible. The host suggests Biden is being hidden from the public because of his inability to speak coherently.

joe biden· naval academy· cognitive decline· university of delaware· lies

43:04 engine kill switch. It's kind of like how you already have your vehicles. Folks, you understand that this is a plan, okay? You know why your vehicle has the automatic engine turn off when you stop your car? It's because ultimately it was going to be used for this. You don't think that was government pressure? Well, now you know why they did it. You know, I've got these clips and it's just every time Joe Biden speaks now, this is why they have been hiding him. He must be deteriorating fast because you don't really see much of him anymore. You notice that? You didn't see or hear much from Joe Biden in this last month, have you? That's because every time he speaks, he either just says something that is just an outright lie that he just made up on the spot, or he makes outrageous statements like claiming he was appointed

43:54 to the Naval Academy in 1965 during a speech to graduates. But it's just like, I mean, I could play these clips of Biden and have no idea what he's saying all day long. Biden is not the real president who is running the show. Biden on vacation with his family in the Bahamas has the omnibus bill flown down so he can sign it to stop climate change. Okay, I see, I see.

CHAPTER 14 / 41 Discussion

DACA Recipient Marriage and Political Conflicts of Interest

A story about an incoming Democrat Congresswoman married to a DACA recipient is used to illustrate how personal loyalties influence political votes. This is compared to politicians who take money from Big Pharma or Planned Parenthood and then promote vaccines or abortion. The segment argues that most politicians serve their donors rather than the American public.

daca· dream act· big pharma· pfizer· planned parenthood

44:31 But that's your president, and of course the University of Delaware, Biden graduated in 1965, so it's not possible for him to have been appointed there after he graduated. It's Joe Biden, he just lies on the spot is what he does. Now, there's an interesting story here that I don't take too much out of, but I think there's a story behind the story. Incoming Democrat Congresswoman is married to DACA recipient who could face deportation if DREAM Act doesn't pass. So obviously we know where she's gonna stand on that bill. Now, I don't really take too much of an issue here because I mean, it's not like she got anything out of marrying a DACA recipient. I don't know, maybe she gets some free money or something. So maybe there is something there.

45:31 My point is, this is how interests in politics works. She has a direct interest in protecting DACA because she's married to a DACA recipient. Well, that may be innocent enough. But when you think about all the different loyalties that your politicians have, none of them are to you. None of them are to you. They're to the highest bidder, the biggest donor. What will win them political favor in DC? What will win them social favor in DC, in New York, on the East Coast? So, okay, you're married to a DACA recipient, that's gonna influence your vote, no doubt. Maybe that's innocent enough, but what about those that take money from big pharma and then promote the vaccine? What about those that take money from Planned Parenthood and then promote abortion? I mean, that's how this works, don't you know? And I've got another story on that coming up later.

46:46 But so okay, innocent enough, you're married to a DACA recipient, that's gonna influence your vote. It's the loyalty that's the story here. She's loyal to her husband. She doesn't wanna see him get deported. Certainly she's gonna vote to protect DACA. But what about a politician funded by, I don't know, a company like Pfizer maybe, AstraZeneca, Moderna? What if they're getting money and then they promote a vaccine and

47:22 Well, it comes out this vaccine is not really working as intended and is actually having negative consequences. Do you think they're gonna come out and say so? Or do you think they're gonna continue to protect their own interests and their own donors? So yeah, okay, a DACA recipient being married to one may influence your approach towards legislation. hearings regarding that, that's innocent enough. What about all the money these crooked politicians take from big pharma and big tech and Planned Parenthood? That's the real story, where do their loyalties lie? I'm interested to hear Gerald Celente in the fourth hour today because I think

CHAPTER 15 / 41 Discussion

Supply Chain Deficits and Green Energy Scarcity

The persistent supply chain deficit is blamed for rising prices in electronics and household goods, despite a lack of consumer awareness. The segment argues that green energy policies are creating a "false scarcity" of energy by shutting down coal and natural gas plants. This is predicted to lead to significantly higher energy and grocery bills throughout 2023.

supply chain· interest rates· electronics prices· coal· natural gas

48:16 We're about to experience a real market correction post COVID, post Biden that we really haven't seen yet. And America and its citizens in the world really have been treading water financially for years now. And they've been thrown some buoys and some life vests by the government in different ways. But that's all coming to an end and the expectation is that we're through it now, things are gonna get back to normal. Quite the contrary folks. Quite the contrary because here's the thing. The supply chain never caught up. The only, the one good news is because Biden botched up the gas deal so badly with Saudi Arabia and Venezuela that we actually may get some lower gas prices coming up at least lower than they have been because he accidentally double dipped and made deals with Saudi Arabia and Venezuela in his complete incompetence and desperation. But aside from that

49:20 You're already seeing the interest rates go up. Oh wow, the price of that house I've been looking at just went down by $100,000. Wow, now's the time to buy. Then you get that interest rate hit and that price never actually went down, did it? Oh sure, the price you're going to make an offer with is certainly going to be lower, but you're still going to pay that higher price just now in the interest rates. But that's just one aspect. So, oh forget about forget about buying that asset now that you're going to need to take out a loan on because you're not going to want to pay those interest rates. But then there's the supply chain issue. The supply chain never got caught up. It's still at a deficit if you would say where

50:09 If you need, here's an example. I'm somebody that purchases electronic equipment and I have for years. About five years ago, really about 10 to five years ago in the electronics department, let's say, prices were going down dramatically. You probably noticed this. TV prices, computer prices, laptops, monitors, all of this stuff just going down. You could buy a nice big They got the 4K TVs now, you could buy a nice big 4K smart TV, 300, 400 bucks be like 50 inches. That same TV is now gonna cost you 800, 900, maybe even $1,000. Why is that? Because the supply chain hasn't caught up. They don't have the chips, they don't have the manufacturing. Plus it's a volatile situation in China and Taiwan and well, the whole thing could go kaput and then China could have complete control over that, which would only make it worse.

51:11 Energy prices. Your energy prices are not going to go down. They're going to go up. And actually what's happening is the consumer price index has not caught up to the producer price index. Well, that's going to happen in 2023. That's why you're going to see the higher grocery bills. That's why everything is going to be more expensive. And now because of these new green energy policies, your energy bill is even going to go up higher Because the government has forced the power companies hands into making a false scarcity of energy by saying you can't use coal or you can't use natural gas.

51:56 And then they have the power grid failure in Texas and they say, wow, look at stupid Texas. Look at the stupid Republicans. They can't even keep the power grid on. No, the Democrats shut it down when you shut off the coal and the natural gas. So you literally, the Democrats literally shut your power off. They literally cut your supply and then they say, ha, you have no power supply, you fools. But it's gonna be everything folks, I'm telling you. Your membership to your country club, to your gym, to your subscription internet TV service, streaming service, it's all going up. The market is finally gonna correct itself, except not the way people think. Everything is about to get more expensive. Biden economy.

CHAPTER 16 / 41 Discussion

2023 Tax Increases and Global Recession Forecast

The IMF chief's warning that one-third of the world economy will be in recession in 2023 is highlighted alongside news of impending tax increases. The segment notes that 2022 saw the worst bond and equity losses since 1871. A "rich-session" is predicted where even middle-class families will have to cut subscriptions, gym memberships, and dining out to survive.

imf· wall street journal· taxes· recession· cable tv

52:45 Biden wiped out $10 trillion of Americans wealth. 2022 saw worst bond and equity losses since 1871. Yet now this is all gonna start catching up. Democrats to increase taxes in 2023 during highest inflation in 40 years and worst bond stock equity losses since 1871. They're gonna increase the taxes because guess what? I got news for you. Things are more expensive for the government too. And they're not gonna take a pay cut. And they're not gonna ramp down their spending. No, no, no, no, no. They're just gonna make you pay more. So, oh, guess what? Consumer price index is gonna go up again. Now your taxes are gonna go up again. Oh, but I thought we were through the worst of it. No, no, no, no, no. You're going to find the worst of it is ahead. Get ready for the rich session from Wall Street Journal.

53:49 And I would translate this story to the divide between the haves and the have-nots is going to become more apparent than ever. Many people are just going to make a decision that we're just not going out to have a nice dinner anymore. Or, you know, I feel grateful, I feel fortunate, I feel blessed where even though pretty much last year, really for two years now, you've been watching your grocery bill slowly go up, For many, you may have even seen it double. And I feel blessed because I go to the grocery store, I see that my bill is double what it was four or five years ago. But I'd say, you know what, I'm lucky I can still afford to get four juicy steaks from the grocery store. Where other people are gonna say, you know what, I can't do the steak anymore. I'm gonna have to get fish or something else.

54:45 The divide between the haves and the have-nots is going to increase, and that's what the story is really about, the rich session. One third of world economy expected to be in recession in 2023 says IMF chief. It's all by design, but don't worry, they'll still be getting paid. Treasuries post biggest annual loss ever as inflation takes toll. So the real The real pain I think from COVID and Biden has really not even hit yet. I think that's going to be the story for 2023. Everybody's expecting kind of these economic numbers where we really saw that was a big story for 2021 with the inflation, the consumer price index, the supply chain shortages. I think that comes back in 2023.

55:39 Because people are looking for a little breathing room and they're thinking things are gonna get more back to normal and it's actually gonna do the exact opposite. So I'm curious to see if Gerald Salente agrees as he will be hosting the fourth hour today. I think he'll be echoing something along those lines. And here's an example. And this is a, this is kind of, it was already going that way, but it's just, it's just the perfect example of cutting. TV's tough trajectory, quarterly pay TV subscriber growth rate. And so, TV subscriptions dropped off 6%, just a round number here, 6% in 2022. Now again, it's been trending that way.

56:43 but people are needing to make cuts and one of the first things people cut in their budget is television or cable television. Especially these days it costs you an arm and a leg just to have cable tv internet every month. So this is just going to continue Cancelling television subscriptions, cancelling internet streaming subscriptions. People will probably be eliminating gym memberships, country club memberships. These are going to be the serious decisions that I think sadly people are gonna thought, hey, maybe we finally have some breathing room here in 2023 post Biden post COVID. We're getting back to normal. No, the market correction is only going to make things worse on the American consumer. So Anthony Fauci is a liar and a crook. Now, we have so much overwhelming evidence of this, you're drowning in it.

CHAPTER 17 / 41 Discussion

Anthony Fauci Gain-of-Function Research and Twitter Files

Anthony Fauci is accused of lying to Congress about his involvement in gain-of-function research. The segment presents a 2018 video of Fauci discussing the lifting of the funding pause on "enhanced potential pandemic pathogens." Elon Musk's upcoming "Fauci Files" release on Twitter is teased as a bombshell that will provide the "receipts" for Fauci's alleged crimes against humanity.

anthony fauci· gain-of-function· nih· p3co· elon musk

57:46 And I'd never seen this before, but let's recall that Anthony Fauci has denied on multiple occasions knowing anything about gain-of-function research. It's like a foreign language to him. He's never even heard of it. Gain-of-function? I don't even know. What is that? I've never even heard of that. When asked about it by Rand Paul, he just is in total denial. He's just completely confused what it even means when asked about it. But we are about to get the second round of Fauci files released via Twitter. Elon Musk's announcement of that coming later this week. But it's funny, for a guy who claims to have no idea about gain-of-function research, never heard of it, doesn't even know what it is, he's not involved in any of it, that's strange coming from a guy here on January 29th, 2018, talking about that exact thing.

58:42 Anyway, so let me just go on about NIH lifts funding pause on gain-of-function research. Let me explain this a little. Pause it, pause it. Let's just reintroduce this clip for you with a little more context. This dirtbag. Who do you like talking about Anthony Fauci more, Donald Trump or Ron DeSantis? Ron DeSantis says he wants to throw that elf off a bridge. Anyway.

59:19 So it was 2014 when this gain of function research that was highly questionable and scrutinized was shut down, specifically at a lab in North Carolina, and it was made illegal. And so Fauci and Obama just basically offshored it, for lack of a better term, and just sent the research to China, and then China took it over with US government funding in a military lab. Well, when this all came out, Anthony Fauci said he's never heard of it, he doesn't fund gain-of-function, he's not, he doesn't even know what gain-of-function is, he has no idea, but then again, here he is, talking about gain-of-function in 2018.

1:00:13 Anyway, so let me just go on about NIH lifts funding pause on gain-of-function research. So let me explain this a little because whenever this comes out, there's always the pushing back and forth from the press. So like NIH now is going to do dangerous research. No, as a matter of fact... Oh, there's always concerns when the NIH does this dangerous research. And then what does it say right there on the screen on his own slide? It says, framework for guiding funding decisions about proposed research involving enhanced potential pandemic pathogens.

1:00:58 The very stuff he says he has no idea what it is, he's never even heard of gated function research. Here he is, I mean folks, this is, again, it's the Austin Powers scene. Like, I don't know what a Swedish penis enlarger pump is. And the guy's like, here's your picture with it. He's like, I swear I don't know what a Swedish penis enlarger pump is. Here's your receipt for it. I've never seen the Swedish penis enlarger pump. I don't know what it is. Here's a book he wrote about it. I don't know gain-of-function research. Oh really? Here's you bragging about it. I've heard of gain-of-function research. Here's you doing a presentation on it. We've never done gain-of-function research. Here's your signature on the funding. Ah, ah. But even on the thing, it says potential pandemic pathogens. And then the very pathogen they were working with

1:01:59 is the pathogen that caused the pandemic. And Fauci just says, I've never even heard of this. But we have the receipts, Fauci. I don't know what this is, baby. This sort of thing ate my bag, baby. One book. Anthony Fauci and Gain-of-Function Research with COVID-19. But let's go back to the slide. I mean, here he is in the slides, in the presentation telling you about gain-of-function. Go ahead. So a framework has been now established to guide funding decisions on proposed research that might be anticipated to create, transfer, or use enhanced potential pandemic pathogens. And he's literally talking about China. The program, everybody has to have a neat little name to it. This is called

1:02:51 P3CO, so if you hear about P3CO, it's potential pandemic preparedness, care and oversight. Now, why is this different from everything else? Now pause it again. How convenient. Look at a timeline of events here. Donald Trump gets elected. And then a month later, Anthony Fauci comes out and says Trump will experience a Pandemic when he's president boy. How did Fauci predict that he must have a crystal ball? No He has the viruses in a lab that he soups up and then releases to the world and then he brags about it So in 2017 Fauci says Trump's gonna experience a pandemic in 2018 Fauci releases funds to do research into pandemic pathogens in China

1:03:47 Funds it, does the presentation, shows you the slides, and then boom in the election year 2020 here comes that pathogenic pandemic that Fauci said was gonna happen but then denied he was involved in researching even though we have all the videos and the receipts with his face, with his voice, with his signature. Boy. I'd say there is a reason to investigate Anthony Fauci for being directly involved in the COVID-19 pandemic. But what does he do? He gets awards for being such a good corrupt eugenicist in the US government. And he expects to just ride off into the sunset.

1:04:38 And he probably will, because that's how corrupt our country is, but there you go. So again, next time you hear Anthony Fauci, I don't know, I've never heard of gain of function, I don't know anything about gain of function, I certainly never funded any gain of function, I don't even know what a gain of function is. Ah, sweetest made penis enlarger pump baby, I don't know anything about this baby, it's not my bag baby. It's not my bag baby. Gain of folks and resa. I don't know any I've never even heard of this. Oh Not my bag, baby. No, it's it's it is your bag, baby So what is the next round of Twitter files on Fauci? Going to show us the Fauci files Elon Musk teaches release of bombshell Fauci files one thing is for sure. It won't be boring. I

CHAPTER 18 / 41 Discussion

People's CDC Mask Mandates and Kamala Harris Testing

A group called "The People's CDC" is criticized for calling for indefinite mask mandates and social distancing. Kamala Harris is also mocked for requiring COVID tests for anyone participating in Senate swearing-in photos. The host characterizes these policies as a "racist eugenics impulse" and a display of extreme hubris by the political elite.

people's cdc· kamala harris· mask mandates· eugenics· covid testing

1:05:36 Elon Musk has teased the release of bombshell Twitter files related to the now ex-director of the Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Anthony Fauci this week as part of what he calls the Fauci files Yeah, you know for all the criticism that Elon Musk receives, fair or foul, has anybody has anybody done as much for the American people as Elon Musk has for the last five months? It's sad to think, but I think it's fair to think that the story or the conclusion of Anthony Fauci's career is going to be an indicator of whether or not we can actually have any hopes to clean up corruption, government corruption specifically in this country. Because what Fauci did is so egregious, so blatant, so obvious. And if we can't even get justice there,

1:06:41 It's gonna be hard to find hope that we can get justice anywhere with such an obvious case. We'll see what comes of the next drop of Fauci files. I suppose maybe Elon Musk is waiting for the next house to get sworn in, hoping that the Republicans there may actually have some interest in an investigation. So I expect that to be the big news story, perhaps Wednesday, Thursday, or even Friday, depending on when they decide to release that. Some other news here though in the health spectrum. Far-left health advocacy group, The People's CDC, calls for continued mask mandates. You see, this is what the left does, the totalitarian control freak left. A far-left group calling itself The People's CDC has called for more radical coronavirus policies.

1:07:39 like indefinite mask mandates and social distancing, charging that America's relaxed pandemic policies stem from a, here we go, racist eugenics impulse beholden to corporate interests. I mean, it's just the reverse reality, you know. You need to do exactly what big pharmaceutical companies say and what big government says who's funded by the big pharmaceutical companies. That's the people CDC telling you that. So, okay, beholden to corporate interests, that's forcing the vaccine on people. You're now beholden by corporate interests, claiming you're fighting corporate interests. How do these people even, you know, their brains are broken. Their brains are broken. Liberalism is a mental disease. We are the people's CDC and we're sick of corporate eugenics.

1:08:47 In big government and big pharma. Oh, okay. Well, what are you guys into? We think we need more mask and vaccine mandates. Wait, I thought you said you were against big government and big corporations telling us what to do. We are! So take your vaccine and wear your mask. What? That's your left. But see, it's all about control. That's what it is. They loved telling you to wear that mask. They loved telling you to social distance. They loved having that control over you. They didn't mind this whole idea of cutting off your nose to spite your face. They like it. They like living miserable lives. They will suffer. They will cut off their nose to spite their own face as long as it spites you too.

1:09:30 They're liberals Kamala Harris requiring kovat tests for anyone over two years old to participate in Senate swearing-in photos That's so nice and loving of her. Yeah She's so open and caring Imagine being such an arrogant bitch Imagine thinking you are so much better than everyone else. You can't reach a level of hubris like that. You can't reach a level of arrogance like Kamala Harris has reached. Very few can even reach it. It's the Obama level, where after you finish taking Hillary in the toilet, you get on all four knees and go down into the toilet bowl with your nose and take a deep breath. Tell everyone how good it smells. So you can't take a photo with Kamala Harris unless you get a COVID test. That is just despicable.

CHAPTER 19 / 41 Discussion

Jeremiah Green Death and Vaccine Side Effect Questions

The death of Modest Mouse drummer Jeremiah Green at age 45 is discussed in the context of potential vaccine side effects. While Green died of cancer, the segment suggests that cancer was a listed side effect of the COVID-19 vaccines and that sudden celebrity deaths should be scrutinized for vaccination status.

jeremiah green· modest mouse· cancer· vaccine side effects· myocarditis

1:10:19 Can't say I'm surprised. Modest Mouse, co-founder and drummer, Jeremiah Green, dead at 45. Now, here's the problem, because anytime now where there's a sudden death or a celebrity dies, people obviously question, was the individual vaccinated? Now, this individual had been diagnosed with cancer. And so I was discussing this two weeks ago with some other stories where somebody takes the vaccine is told they have cancer a month or two later and then dies within two years from that cancer. We know about the myocarditis, we know about the heart attacks, we know about the blood clots, we know about the neurological problems. Cancer was also a side effect listed in the vaccine side effects. A less prominent one obviously, but it was there.

1:11:07 But we don't really talk about that, do we? So I don't know if that's the story with Jeremiah Green, but it's a fair question, I think, to ask, knowing that is another one of the side effects that they don't want you to know about and that they hid from the public while promoting this deadly vaccine. California and New York now require all private insurance plans to fully cover abortion if they offer maternity care coverage. Now you understand that this is fascism, right? And once you've seen how this all works with the money laundering that they do, you don't even really have to... it doesn't take much. As soon as you see it, you know it. So let me explain how this works. This is the definition of fascism.

CHAPTER 20 / 41 Discussion

Planned Parenthood Money Laundering and Insurance Mandates

The segment describes a "fascist" cycle where the government gives $500 million annually to Planned Parenthood, which then donates millions back to the Democrat Party. New laws in California and New York requiring private insurance to cover abortion are framed as a way to keep this "racketeering operation" funded despite a decrease in procedures.

planned parenthood· money laundering· fascism· california· abortion

1:11:57 This is the definition of money laundering. Here's how it goes. The government, Democrats and Republicans, take your taxpayer dollars. So they tax you and they take that money and then what do they do? They give it to Planned Parenthood. I don't remember the... Guys, see if you can find an annual number that Planned Parenthood gets from the government. I think it's like 500 million a year or something. Probably more than that. But see if you guys can find that annual number that Planned Parenthood receives from the federal government. So the government takes your tax dollars, gives it to Planned Parenthood, and then Planned Parenthood turns around and gives it to the Democrat Party. 99% of Planned Parenthood political donations have been to Democrats. And of course, Democrats are the ones promoting abortion. So, well of course Planned Parenthood is going to be funding the Democrat Party. They're keeping Planned Parenthood in business.

1:13:02 Talk about eugenics. So the Democrats tax you, they give your tax dollars to Planned Parenthood, then they receive political donations from Planned Parenthood. See, they have just stolen from you. But Planned Parenthood is the middleman. So there you go, yeah, just over 500 million a year annually from the government goes to Planned Parenthood. So that's direct direct theft from you to Planned Parenthood back to the Democrats. You see how that cycle works? Because you can plug in the next search and pull it up. 99% of Planned Parenthood political donations go to Democrats. So the Democrats take your tax dollars, give them to Planned Parenthood, and then Planned Parenthood gives them right back to the Democrats. And then they do the cycle every year. The definition of fascism. The definition of money laundering.

1:14:00 And it just happens year after year. And they say, well, well, this is if you just offer maternity care coverage. Well, yeah, you don't think insurance providers are offering maternity care coverage as if that's some sort of a special thing? No. All these private insurance companies now are going to be forced to cover abortion. That's what this is about. So, it just, all this does is keep the giant racketeering operation going. You scratch my back, I scratch yours. That's how it works with Planned Parenthood and the Democrats. And meanwhile, you're paying for the whole thing. Yeah, they spent $45 million in the 2020 cycle towards Democrats spent at Planned Parenthood to elect Democrats. So,

1:14:57 Oh, I see, I see. Oh, oh, oh, we're gonna make you, we're gonna now write bills because abortion is not getting the money in like it used to. So now we're gonna write bills, Democrats gonna write bills forcing insurance companies to fund Planned Parenthood where they're now having shortages because people aren't killing their babies anymore. It's Democrats, don't they sound like a lovely group of people? Look, there's a Democrat party event happening right there on the screen. Amazing. So this is breaking news right now. An attorney general

CHAPTER 21 / 41 Discussion

US Virgin Islands Attorney General Firing and Epstein

Attorney General Denise George of the US Virgin Islands was terminated days after filing a lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase for aiding Jeffrey Epstein. The segment claims this is a direct effort by the deep state to protect the Epstein client list and prevent further investigation into the pimping operation.

denise george· jp morgan chase· jeffrey epstein· virgin islands· cover-up

1:15:37 From the US Virgin Islands, Denise George has been fired. Attorney General terminated just days after filing a lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase for aiding Jeffrey Epstein. She gets fired. You don't dare look into the deep state pimp. And of course, that's where Joe Biden is right now. Is he still down there partying guys? I'm not sure. Or maybe signing omnibus bills. Who knows? Or maybe running quid pro quo operations like he did in Ukraine when he was vice president. Who knows? He's not even sure. Maybe he's going for a run, and I'm not talking about on the beach. So there you go. Denise George, who served as the Attorney General for four years, has been terminated.

1:16:26 Shortly after launching a lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase for aiding Epstein. Yes, you don't dare start digging there. You don't dare start digging into the Epstein client list. You don't dare dig that up. No. How dare you? So that'll be an ongoing story. I'm sure. And the cover up of the Jeffrey Epstein clients continues. continues because you don't want any of that coming out. All right. Now, ladies and gentlemen, another year for InfoWars on the air is another year of victory for free speech against the corporate world government. We take a lot of blows, there's no doubt, but still being on air in and of itself is a victory. And so we'd like to see that continue.

CHAPTER 22 / 41 Discussion

Times Square Machete Attack and FBI Watch List

A 19-year-old, Trevor Bickford, allegedly attacked police with a machete in Times Square despite being on an FBI watch list as a radicalized jihadist. The segment argues the FBI is failing to stop actual terrorists because it is too focused on investigating January 6th defendants and Trump supporters.

trevor bickford· times square· fbi watch list· jihadism· january 6th

1:19:07 We've got an in-studio guest coming up in the next hour, James Younger, dealing with the Texas Supreme Court ruling against him seeking to prevent chemical castration of his son. So we'll be discussing that story. It's a real gut-wrencher. It's a real heart-stopper at times. So we'll be discussing that. A couple other stories here today. And You know guys, I'm gonna send you something here quickly if you could print it for me before the end of the break because it ties into this January 6th news that I'm about to get into. And it really just shows how Trump was surrounded by a bunch of losers at the end of the day in his White House.

1:19:57 So hey, I'll be critical of Trump when he deserves it. I'll defend Trump when he deserves it. Trump was surrounded by losers and we're learning more about that now. One girl in particular, I'll explain, but if you guys can just print me that tweet whenever you get it. Radicalized Times Square attacker was on FBI watch list. And so why didn't the FBI do anything about 19 year old Trevor Bickford, who injured three police officers with a machete in Times Square? who is on the FBI watch list as a radicalized potential threat to danger? Well, because the FBI is not concerned about stopping dangerous individuals from harming people. They're more concerned about doing the bidding of the Republican, excuse me, of the Democrat party and

1:20:39 and the January 6th committee going after Trump supporters and all of the January 6th defendants. That's their main goal. That's their main agenda. So yeah, sure a terrorist gets out in New York City, stabs some people, hurts some cops. Who cares? They're going after innocent people that stood in the grass on January 6th. Suspect converted to jihadism before New Year's Eve machete attack on New York Police Department Times Square. Now, if this story would have been in the news 10 years ago, 20 years ago, it would have been the number one story and it would have been all about Islamic Jihadism. But because that's no longer the flavor of the month, now the flavor of the month is right-wing radicalism. They don't care about a story like this. Now, I don't care whether the guy was

CHAPTER 23 / 41 Discussion

Ray Epps Controversy and January 6th Prisoner Book

Ray Epps is criticized for his testimony to the January 6th committee, where he claimed conspiracy theories ruined his life. The segment contrasts Epps' freedom with the "torture" of actual January 6th prisoners, citing a new book, "The American Gulag Chronicles." Epps is characterized as a potential federal provocateur who encouraged people to enter the Capitol without facing charges.

ray epps· january 6th· federal provocateur· american gulag chronicles· prison

1:21:36 Islamic or a Nazi skinhead or anything. He's clearly a deranged lunatic, went out to kill cops and the FBI maybe could have stopped it. I mean, you can have that debate of what can they do, but we know what they're not doing and we know what they are doing. And they're not stopping violent terrorists and they are arresting innocent men and women who had nothing to do with any violence on January 6th. And then you deal with the re-ups craziness. And this thing, honestly, I struggled to even report this to you because it's so insane. It makes so little sense. I don't even know how to present it to you in a way that does make sense. So I'll just read the stories here. Pro-Trump protester Ray Epps, pro-Trump protester Ray Epps, isn't that convenient? Told January 6th committee crazy conspiracy theories tore apart his life.

1:22:35 And then in other stories, I'm telling you, it's so whacked out, I don't even know how to explain it. There's stories going on the internet right now that say how Ray Epps admits to his son that he's a federal provocateur that was aiding in the events of January 6th. But then he says, oh, I had nothing to do with it, and I have nothing to do with the FBI, and I didn't even know anything was happening that day.

1:23:13 Really? Well then why are you in multiple videos saying you're gonna go into the Capitol and promoting to other people to do just that on January 5th and on January 6th? How come you were on the FBI watch list and then taken off the FBI's list? But see, oh, he can say on the record he helped orchestrate it and he was part of it and then he can go in front of the January 6th committee and say I had nothing to do with it, I didn't even know anything was going on that day and they say, yep, that's what we're gonna run with. And then he says,

1:23:50 that his life has been torn apart by these crazy conspiracy theories. Wait a second, Ray. Still to this day, you're the only person I've ever seen in any videos encouraging people to go into the Capitol except maybe Jaden X. And, but he actually did get arrested and charged. I don't know the latest with his account, but you didn't. He did. Oh, but your life is being torn apart. Not the innocent people who have had hundreds of thousands of dollars of legal bills. Not people who've actually been arrested, not innocent people who've been blocked up and tortured. There's a new book that's about to come out from a January 6th prisoner that's going to be highlighting the torment and the torture of their everyday lives. But no, it's Ray Epps who still walks free and can live his life. He's the one that's being victimized by the January 6th scrutiny. Give me a break. But here's the book I'm discussing.

1:24:54 January 6th book release, first-hand testimony of harrowing tragedy from the January 6ers living it, the American Gulag Chronicles, letters from prison. So that's already out there. But Ray Epps is the one that's suffering. Now, I wasn't even going to cover this today, but I'm out of time in this segment, so I may just bury it. But when you realize the type of people that Trump had working for him, you realize why everything went down the way it did. And some of the latest comments that we've seen revealed in text messages from the likes of Hope Hicks, show me why there was never really any hope. All right, a couple things here real quick before we're joined in studio by James Younger. I'm talking to Alex in the break and he is really focused.

CHAPTER 24 / 41 Discussion

Hope Hicks Text Messages and Trump Administration Failures

Leaked text messages from Hope Hicks following January 6th reveal her fear of becoming "perpetually unemployed" and being labeled a "domestic terrorist." The host criticizes Hicks and other Trump appointees for being "losers" who cared more about their own prestige than the country. The segment argues Trump was surrounded by people who didn't understand the fight and were quick to throw him under the bus.

hope hicks· january 6th· donald trump· domestic terrorists· unemployment

1:25:49 on the Fauci files that are about to be coming up and he's going to be filing a report on the Fauci files by the end of the day and tomorrow regarding what he knows is about to be released. So stay tuned for Alex Jones coverage of that with Infowars.com covering the news stories and Band.video sharing the videos. So that's going to be big and of course It's everything we've already told you, it's just gonna be with the receipts, the total proof now and it'll become once again the same question of is anybody going to be punished for these massive crimes against humanity? Now, quickly, so, Hope Hicks, who was probably hired because of her looks, let's just call it what it is, I'll be the controversial one to say it. You know what, it's fine, people get hired for their looks all the time, doesn't mean they're incompetent or can't do their job.

1:26:50 And good looking people get hired, it's just a fact. But when you see some of these texts being revealed now, you realize why Donald Trump's presidency was set for failure. Because he had a bunch of losers surrounding him. And I'm gonna try to explain this psychology here. This is a text, Hope Hicks post January 6th text revealed. Quote, all of us who didn't have jobs lined up will be perpetually unemployed. I'm so mad and upset. We all look like domestic terrorists now. This made us unemployable, untouchable. God, I'm so effing mad. So imagine, here's Hope Hicks, who takes a job working for the greatest president in modern American history.

1:27:43 And she is upset because the lies told about Donald Trump and the lies told about Trump supporters are going to negatively impact her. Oh, poor Hope. I feel so sorry for you, Hope. I mean, I'm sure you are arrested for false claims, right? Yeah, no, you weren't. And she's upset because now she looks like a domestic terrorist. People are lying about you, Hope? Wow. People are lying about Hope and that upsets her. And she's mad because she didn't have a job lined up, so she decided to throw Trump under the bus hoping that she could have a job. I guess hope doesn't have enough merit to get a job. You're going to be perpetually unemployed and so I'll do anything. I'll throw Trump under the bus. I'll cooperate with the January 6th committee. Just anything to save myself. We're unemployable. No, if you're unemployable, you were unemployable before then. But so she's mad.

1:28:44 Not at the media that lies, not at the Democrats that lie, not at the people that are actually trying to destroy her. But instead, the people that are on the same boat that her enemies are trying to sink. And she's mad. Imagine you're on the Titanic sinking and this woman is like, what's gonna happen to me? But what about me? I don't even know how to swim. I can't swim, I don't have a life jacket. Pathetic, pathetic. So it shows you two things, and

1:29:22 I'm not picking on Hope Hicks here. This is probably an example of many others, is my guess. That's why I'm using this as the example. We just have all these techs from her. So it shows two things. It shows that the people Trump brought in really never had any idea what they were involved in, totally clueless. Again, this is a situation where they just wanted the prestige, they wanted the access, they wanted that for themselves. Hope Hicks didn't get in this cuz she cares about the country. Clearly, she got in this cuz she cares about herself. And my guess is this is just one example of dozens, if not most of Trump's appointees and cabinet members. They didn't understand the fight. They didn't want the fight. And as soon as things got a little rough and tumble, they throw their hands in the air and say, I'm the victim. What about, poor Hope Hicks. It must be so hard to be Hope Hicks guys. I can't even imagine it.

1:30:20 She's worried that she's gonna be perpetually unemployed and is unemployable, but she's not mad at the people that caused all that. No, she's mad at Donald Trump and the Trump supporters cuz she thinks throwing them under the bus maybe will get her another job. And it's time for humanity to stand up in the info war and say I don't know what's gonna happen at the end of this, but you wanna fight, you better believe you got one. From the front lines of the information war, it's Alex Jones.

CHAPTER 25 / 41 Discussion

Jeff Younger Interview on Texas Supreme Court Ruling

Jeff Younger joins the studio to discuss the Texas Supreme Court's refusal to block his ex-wife from taking their son to California for gender transition treatments. Younger details the eight-year legal battle, alleging his ex-wife, a pediatrician, began cross-dressing their son at age two. He discusses the role of gender clinics and the financial motives behind pediatric transitions.

jeff younger· james younger· texas supreme court· johanna olson kennedy· gender clinic

1:31:20 with how much say you have over your child's future. Texas Supreme Court rules against father seeking to prevent chemical castration of his son via gender bending hormones. The Supreme Court of Texas denied my mandamus, effectively terminating my parental rights. My children are now subject to being chemically castrated in California. Texas is an empire of child abuse led by Texas judges. The Texas Supreme Court ruled against a father petition to prevent his ex-wife from taking his seven-year-old son to California for hormone treatments that amount to chemical castration. That father is James Young, excuse me, Jeff Younger, and he joins me now. And so Jeff, just, I know this has been a years long conversation.

1:32:05 struggle for you and your family. And so for a lot of new audience members, they've probably heard about, okay, the trans kids, you can take them to California and the doctors will chop them up there, but they won't do it in Texas. But this has been a long backstory for you. It's been a year's struggle to get to this point. Lay out the backstory so that people get a better idea of what led to this decision and what it means. So, it's been eight solid years of litigation. When my son turned two, my ex-wife tried to transition him to a girl. I was still married to her and we were still living together. And when I told her that she couldn't do that, she filed for divorce, forced me out of the house. She's a pediatrician. She used to practice in Capell, Texas. And she used a lot of her knowledge, medical knowledge, to get me out of the house and away from my kids.

1:32:55 And at three years old, I took the first iPhone video I had ever taken. And it was my son telling me that he thought he was a girl and I asked him why and he said, well, mommy says I'm a girl. And then I realized that she was cross-dressing him. She was telling him he had a girl's brain and a boy's body. She had began to present him to the world as a girl and so forth. And to your understanding, These were not original thoughts of your sons, but coming from your wife at the time, your ex-wife. Yeah, I mean, you know, an 18 month old child, two year old child just doesn't have any notion of these things. They don't think that they have a girl's brain. That's the type of thing a pediatrician would think. So what happened was she began to really push this much harder, till eventually she enrolled him in school as a girl.

1:33:47 And Capel Public Schools. He went to Pinkerton Elementary in Capel, Texas. People get real mad at me because I name names. You know, I learned that from Alex. Name names, tell people who these, what's really going on in these places. So he went to Pinkerton Elementary. I would take him to school in boys clothes. And this teacher would give him a dress to wear and change him into a dress and they'd make him use the girls restroom. And there was a period of time there up to about six years old where he was always a little unsure, like because the teacher, the principal, the lunch lady, the librarian, the police officer at school, they were all telling him he was a girl. And why was that?

1:34:23 Because they decided to just go with the mom, whatever the mom wanted. So this was the mother basically getting in touch, making communications with the school saying, I need everybody to have my back here. Yes, in fact, that dress was given to the teacher by Ann Georgilis, my son's mother, so that he could be changed in it surreptitiously without my knowledge. I found this out about a year later. I filed grievances with the school. The school found that that didn't violate any of my parental rights. amazing, when you go through the school grievance process. And so eventually this culminated into a big trial when my sons were eight in 2019. And we brought in the world's experts from both sides of the issue.

1:35:11 Your wife decided one of the twin boys, she wanted to be a girl for whatever the reason was. Maybe she wished she had a daughter, but that's how it went. That's right. And just to be clear, also, like, she actually enrolled him into a gender clinic to be transitioned. Okay, I had to stop that with the psychiatrist. I talked to a panel of six psychiatrists and got that all stopped. She took him to a married lesbian psychologist. And she recommended that he go to another gender clinic or quote, the medical side of treatment. It's in his pediatric records. And this is all from the ages of two to six. Two to six. It's in his pediatric records that at five years old, the pediatrician and my ex-wife were talking about chemically castrating him at age nine. So this culminates in a trial. The top experts in the world on this issue come to this little courtroom in Dallas County.

1:36:03 I deposed their experts and the depositions were absolutely devastating and they didn't even put their experts on. They didn't want to get their experts in front of the jury. One of the persons that I deposed was Johanna Olson Kennedy. She runs one of the largest gender clinic for children in America in LA County where my children now live. I bet she makes good money doing that. She makes millions and millions of dollars. Must be nice. And a lot of it subsidized by California, by the way. It's taxpayer money. Must be really nice. Yep. And I asked her bluntly, how do you medically justify cutting off healthy body parts from children? And she said, well, if they're causing psychological distress, they're not healthy. And I said, thank you, I'm gonna put that in front of the jury. And they didn't put her on. So I won that trial, I got 50-50 custody and no child support. The one proviso was I had to go to a counselor.

CHAPTER 26 / 41 Discussion

Judge Mary Brown and Family Court Corruption

Jeff Younger criticizes Judge Mary Brown, whom he calls "Bloody Mary Brown," for stripping his parental rights and enforcing supervised visitation. He explains how the family court system uses temporary orders to bypass final judgments and keep fathers in perpetual litigation. Younger claims the court intentionally created conditions that would lead to the termination of his rights under California law.

mary brown· family court· custody· supervised visitation· legal battle

1:36:53 And I had to cover nine things with a counselor, things like unconditional love of your children, recognizing the signs of bullying, the typical things that they would order in a divorce. As if you weren't the one already doing that. I know, I know. So in a transparently corrupt proceeding, the most powerful family law firm in Texas, Kuhns Fuller, in an absolutely transparently corrupt proceeding, recused the judge that made that ruling against them. Gave me a judge in the 301st District Court, her name is Mary Brown. I call her Bloody Mary Brown. Bloody Mary Brown refused to implement the court order giving me 50-50 custody and no child support. And through a series of temporary orders was able to strip me of all of my parental rights to the point where I had supervised possession, less possession time than convicted pedophiles.

1:37:44 And they would not let me take my son out of address at these supervised possessions, forcing me to abuse my son in order to see him. So I refused to obey those conditions and instead wrote my son letters and have been attempting legal action to change that. And what happened was the judge had carefully set up orders that allowed my ex-wife to move to California. And the previous orders that stripped me of my parental rights were carefully constructed based on California law. So all of those orders prohibit me from talking to my son, meeting with my son. I don't know the address of my son so I can't write him letters now. If you don't have contact with your child for a year in California, you lose your parental rights. They can terminate them without your consent.

1:38:31 So this judge created the conditions where I can't have any of those contacts required by California law and then allowed my ex to move to California. Well it sounds to me that this is basically them saying you had your day in court and there was a trial and Let's say it went fairly enough. Well, they didn't like the results, so they just flipped the table over and said, nope, we're going to do it again, and we're going to make sure we win this time. We're going to make sure the ref is in our back pocket. That's exactly right. And that's one of the huge problems that people don't know about family court. In every other court, whether it's criminal or civil, once you get a final judgment, you're done. Like you can appeal,

1:39:11 But you can't go back and get a second bite at the apple at that trial. But in family courts, the trial court lawyers have figured out mechanisms using temporary orders to keep that alive. I've been under constant litigation for nine years. I've never lived under a final order despite having three trials and three final orders. I've never lived under them. I've lived under temporary orders. And just so you know, You know, I had to Uber here and there's a credit card receipt for that. That Uber receipt will be scrutinized by opposing counsel because I have to turn over every single expenditure over to them because I'm under these temporary orders, right? So I don't have any financial privacy, nothing. Every aspect of my life is scrutinized because of this stuff. And so now they're just trying to run the clock out on you is what it sounds like. That's what they're trying to do. So the concept here was they wanted to get her to California

1:40:02 Right before Senate Bill 107 took effect on the 1st of January and that's what's in this mandate this This the subject of this ruling by the Supreme Court So let's get to that on the other side of this break folks You've just got some of the background information that's led to this. I can't even imagine an eight-year long battle This is the last thing you expected becoming a father that this is how you're gonna spend Almost your first ten years with one of your twin boys and we'll continue to discuss this with Jeff Younger on the other side of the break don't go anywhere So I'm learning more about this from Jeff Younger in between the breaks and it's just, it's crazy because I don't want to get off the topic because I want to get to where we're at today.

CHAPTER 27 / 41 Discussion

California Senate Bill 107 and Transgender Sanctuary

The discussion focuses on California's Senate Bill 107, which established the state as a "transgender sanctuary." Jeff Younger explains that this law allows California to ignore Texas subpoenas and court orders regarding gender-affirming care. He argues the Texas Supreme Court engaged in "sophistry" by claiming he could still enforce his rights while his children are in a sanctuary state.

senate bill 107· california· transgender sanctuary· scott wiener· parental rights

1:40:42 with the Supreme Court ruling, but it's like, my goodness, the aspect of you having to fight the entire establishment, the aspect of this has now gone beyond the scope of just your family. Now it's just a whole, there's a whole activist wing that you're having to go against. They don't have your kids' interest in mind. They have their own interest in mind. And so there's all kinds of questions that I have for you, but let's just get back to the story as it is with the update here. So talk about the Supreme Court ruling that has you in studio with us today. So here's the genesis of this. She moved to LA County in California. That's all I know. I'm not allowed to know where my children are, where they go to school or anything. And Senate Bill 107 was gonna take effect on the 1st of January.

1:41:30 So I was seeking relief from the Supreme Court to get my children back to Texas before that law went into effect. It's a transgender sanctuary bill. And what it says is that California will not cooperate with any state that doesn't provide affirming, what they call gender affirming health care. Which is the opposite of what it's called. Yes, exactly. It's actually mutilating children. So what it means is California will not obey subpoenas from Texas courts. They will not extradite if a court calls for someone's arrest. They will not obey restraining orders or temporary orders or court orders which would prevent gender affirming healthcare.

1:42:16 It also sets up gender affirming healthcare, I'm using California's terms, as what's called a confidential healthcare. They have a status there of confidential healthcare. So one of the weird things about California, it's also an abortion sanctuary state. If you're 12 years old, you can consent to an abortion in California without your parents even knowing about it. because it's considered a confidential health care and has a special status as a medical procedure. Geez, yeah, it won't be long till you'll be 12 year old will be the age of consent in California. That's right. Well, we know what San Francisco is trying to do there. Yeah. The bills they've introduced. So, now the same thing with these procedures, children will be able to consent without their parents' consent. Further,

1:42:59 Judges in California can do things that Texas judges can't do. A California judge can order a child transitioned with neither parent consenting, if they consider it in the best interest of the child. So there are a whole host of problems that happen. Now, she is under an injunction. She's not allowed, she's under court order. She cannot chemically castrate my son or do any surgical procedures to him, okay? But how am I supposed to enforce that injunction after the passage of Senate Bill 107 in California? Especially if they run the clock out on you and you're not allowed to speak to your son for a year. That's right. That's another thing. The temporary orders that were passed by Bloody Mary Brown in the 301st Judicial District Court in Texas

1:43:47 Bloody Mary Brown carefully crafted these temporary orders to prevent me from satisfying California's contact rules to maintain your parental rights. So if I follow Bloody Mary Brown's rulings and orders, I will inevitably lose my parental rights in California and I'll have an involuntary termination of those rights. So this was carefully set up by the court to take my parental rights in California. And it's also carefully set up by the court to allow my ex-wife, Ms. Georgilis, to transition my son with no recourse. This is like a jigsaw trap from the movie Saw. It's like, okay, if you want to be free, you're going to have to walk through a bed of nails or a bunch of cutting wire or something. That's right. So I went to the Supreme Court of Texas because it was an emergency. I didn't even go to the appeals court because I didn't have time.

1:44:38 I went to the Supreme Court and said, they're sending my son to a transgender sanctuary state. She has tried to transition my son in the past. That makes her a risk of doing this in California where I have no recourse to enforce this. But the Supreme Court strongly disagreed with me and said, nope, we read California's law. And despite what the California Legislative Council says, you can still enforce this injunction. And what they mean by that is quite sophistical. This is the kind of thing a sophist would say. Sure, we can enforce it in Texas. We can for example call for the return of the children We can for example hold miss Georgiou in contempt and and jail her if she doesn't follow these orders The problem is California won't send her back. Yeah, they're in sanctuary now, and they won't send my children back So this the Supreme Court really engaged in some tremendous sophistry here to pretend that I can enforce this injunction on

1:45:33 And under California law, which I cannot now since January 1st has passed. Yeah, it sounds like they just want to wipe their hands of the issue. Well, here's the thing. I became a political problem for important people in the political establishment here, right? We have in the Republican Party, there's a civil war between the donor class and the voters. The voters are conservative voters, traditional conservative voters and want traditional values in the platform. The donors are Northeastern liberals, and they don't want those traditional values in the platform. And what happens is the establishment tries to please both. So I'm a thorn in their side, because until they get rid of me in this state, the political issue of child transitions is never going to go away. But now Governor Abbott

CHAPTER 28 / 41 Discussion

Texas GOP Establishment and Legislative Failures

Jeff Younger and the host discuss the "civil war" within the Texas Republican Party between the donor class and the voters. They criticize Speaker Dade Phelan and Governor Greg Abbott for allowing conservative bills to die in committee while prioritizing the interests of liberal donors. Younger argues the establishment wants his case to go to California so they no longer have to deal with the political fallout.

dade phelan· greg abbott· texas gop· donor class· conservative bills

1:46:20 the homosexual activist, Dade Phelan, who's the Speaker of the House in Texas. These people can now say, hey, that's a California issue. It's over in California, it's not our issue anymore. And the Supreme Court plays duplicity with that. Because the Supreme Court is saying, well, it's still a Texas court issue, and you can still enforce it, even though you can never get your kids back over here, and they can still transition them. And then, cuz I've noticed this too at the local level, not to get off topic, but The Texas GOP needs to have a split with the GOP at the national level because there's a complete conflict of interest there. Because what I've noticed is at the local level, you have a lot of these guys

1:46:57 their local leaders, the Republican Party, that they're not really interested in being a leader per se. They're interested in having a nice cushy job and having a ladder that they can climb to hopefully get to a nice government position or even be a representative maybe, something like that. and so that's what I've noticed. So they're not going to press back against the Republican establishment. They're not going to press back against the national GOP because they want to be, you know, they want to coddle to them. They want to, they want to beg for some scraps and keep these, most of these jobs are just worthless. They work like three days a week, maybe do a TV interview. 100%.

1:47:35 But they represent a lot of power. Remember, these are people... You know, we complain about Nietzsche and kind of his approach, but Nietzsche had this really awesome way of looking at things. He said, let's don't look at what the good someone's pursuing. Let's ask what kind of person would want that good. What kind of person would want to be in control and in power over other people? And you can get a sense of their personalities. So the game they want to play is they want all that donor money, right, to give them power and let them move up. But they wanna please the conservative base. So here's the typical thing that happens in Texas that Republican voters just fall for every single time, every election cycle. They're gonna propose, for example, this coming session, all kinds of conservative bills.

1:48:15 And those conservatives' bills magically will never have time to get to the floor. And they'll pound their chest about how great the bill is. Oh, absolutely. And it just never comes to the floor to get a vote. Just didn't have time. But they can make Dr. Pepper the drink of Texas and they can do all this other stuff and name bridges, but they can't get these conservative bills to a vote. So what's really happening is they're killing their own bills behind the scenes in committee. Like, they kill their own bills. Every person I talk to that gets- Yeah. interested or invested at the local level tells me that exact same thing. They didn't even let me get to that level. They basically banned me from all their events, kicked me out of all their events. They didn't even want me sniffing around that. I already smelled it, believe me. So we're gonna be right back here with Jeff Younger. I do have some other questions as far as the situation is concerned. But you have to understand this is a precedent setting case, folks. That's why this is so key. All right, a couple other big issues here with Jeff Younger in studio and

CHAPTER 30 / 41 Discussion

Psychological Conditioning and the Susan Fletcher Report

Younger describes how his son was allegedly conditioned by a court-appointed psychologist, Susan Fletcher, to identify as a girl. He claims Fletcher only saw the boy when he was dressed as a girl and initiated a CPS investigation when the boy expressed a desire to be a boy. Younger argues the entire psychological establishment is geared toward "affirming" transitions rather than exploring biological reality.

susan fletcher· operant conditioning· gender identity· cps· red flag commission

1:51:19 Look, the left is anti-family. I don't have to sit here and convince you of that. The leftist activists, they don't care about your son. They don't care about your wife. They couldn't care less. What they care about is the result of this case being the precedent setting case. That's right. I think early on, they keyed into this case because of one specific fact. My son only presents as a girl with his mother. With me and everybody else, he's always presented as a boy. And I think the calculus that they went through was if we can get this boy, we can get any child we want. And they wanted that to be locked into the law.

1:51:55 And they're using this case to make that happen. So now they've got it locked into the law that if you violate gag orders and talk about your son being transitioned, you can lose all your parental rights. If you run for political office and you don't follow the restrictions that a judge puts on your political speech, which they did. They tried to stop me from running for office by putting on a gag order which restricted me from talking about political topics around transgenderism. I didn't follow any of those orders and they restricted my parental rights. Now they've reached the point where now, okay, Texas, you've got this attorney general opinion which says this is child abuse, you may pass a law making these procedures child abuse. That's Ken Paxton. Yeah, but.

1:52:39 Now, any court in Texas can export a child to a transgender sanctuary state. And again, just to reemphasize that, it was the judge in this case that let your wife take your sons to California. She let that happen. Judge Mary Brown wrote an affirmative order allowing her to move to California after A year long campaign of stripping my parental rights to remove all of my ability to follow California's law for contacting your children. Setting me up for termination of parental rights. This was set up over 18 months to terminate my parental rights by a judge. When was the last time you spoke to your sons? July of last year.

1:53:25 And what provoked that was, and this is the reason I got supervised visitation, my son was seeing a court appointed counselor. Her name is Susan Fletcher. She was an Abbott appointee. She was on the Red Flag Commission, where they were trying to restrict our gun rights based on a psychologist finding. She was a psychologist on that commission appointed by Abbott. You think it's an accident I got an Abbott appointee as my son's psychologist? I don't think so. So she refused to see my son when he came from my home, because when he comes from my home, he's just a normal boy. She would only see my son when he came from my ex-wife's home when he came as a girl. So finally I got possession time in my July summer visitation for a month, and she had to take my son for two visits during that month. And my son flat out told her that he didn't want to wear a dress to school and he wants to be a boy. She threw him out of the office, initiated a CPS investigation against me.

1:54:19 Produced a report and would not present it with my lawyer present and then wrote a letter to the court and never told the court that my son wanted to be a boy, but said that I was forcing my son to take recordings in her office. And on that basis, they gave me supervised visitation. So my son asked to be a boy and I'm the bad guy. I don't think you would ever And these are my words, but I don't know if a parent would ever wish his son to be obstinate or rebellious at such a young age. But man, if I was in your shoes, that might be my last hope is that my son is going to be an obstinate rebel to these people because it might be the only hope you have left. I mean, I'm just thinking if they don't even let him make up his mind, that just shows you it's not about him. It's never about him. And listen, I really didn't push my son. I'll tell you what I did with my son. It's very simple.

CHAPTER 31 / 41 Discussion

Masculine Culture and the Fight for Fatherhood

Jeff Younger recounts his efforts to expose his sons to "masculine culture" through boxing and hunting, which he says led his son to reject a female identity. He discusses a letter he wrote to his sons about avoiding "effeminacy," which was later used against him in court as evidence of misogyny. Younger frames his struggle as a fundamental fight for the future of fatherhood.

boxing· hunting· masculine culture· fatherhood· effeminacy

1:55:13 I just showed my son how awesome it is to be a man. So we joined a boxing gym. And my sons learned, doesn't matter if you win your sparring matches, it doesn't matter. If you put in the work, everybody respects you, if you put in the work. If you don't put in the work, nobody respects you in a boxing gym, right? You learn humility in a boxing gym. You don't talk smack in a boxing gym. It's a good way to get beat down, right? My sons learned masculine culture is awesome and they loved it. I took them hunting. I taught them how to be self-sufficient. In my home, I didn't even have rules. I said, look, your job is to be reasonable with people, right? I'm not gonna set any rules. Be reasonable with people. Your room doesn't have to be perfectly clean. It should just never rise to my attention, right? And we also had the no mistake rule. If you make a mistake but you fix it, it's not a mistake. No punishment, no consequences whatsoever. So my sons learned very quickly to just take care of themselves and be reasonable with people.

1:56:11 And they loved masculine culture and thrived. And I knew that if I had my son 50-50 and exposed him to masculine culture, he'd reject a female identity. And he did that in one month. And on the basis of him rejecting a female identity, that took my kids away from me. Well, and again, that just shows you the agenda here is just targeting your son and they just want to overwhelm his own natural instincts. They want to overwhelm your instincts as a father. And this is their act of dominance over you. This is what the left does. It's an act of dominance and it's an act of torture. And it's to just say, doesn't matter what's common sense, doesn't matter what's sanity, we dominate you, we own you, we're controlling you. And I think that's why all these activists are in on this case. So I mean, again,

1:56:54 You haven't spoken to your sons in more than half a year, so I mean I imagine that there's a lot of questions that you have. I mean, what about them? I mean, are they talking to one another? Do you know that? What about influence from the other twin brother that's not being told he's gonna be a girl? What about, do you know about any of that? I've written over 100 pages of letters to my sons, and I have no idea if they're getting them. In some sense, they're written to their future selves, older selves, looking back on this traumatic incident in their lives. And in some sense, it's written to 10-year-old boys, right? And some of those letters have been actually thrown back at me in court and used as evidence against me in court.

1:57:38 One of them, and this is a great example of this, as an answer to your question. One of them, I talk about the problem is that we are being separated by effeminacy in our culture. And that your job right now as boys is to avoid effeminacy at all costs while simultaneously being obedient to your mother. And that you have to recognize that these effeminate forces have a lot of power over you right now. But when you grow up, they won't. And this was presented at court as evidence that somehow I hate women. Oh yeah, you're a misogynist. Oh yeah, absolutely. Somehow that I was training my sons to go against their mom and all this stuff. I also said that the people that have done this to you will ultimately pay.

1:58:24 And they took that as a threat. Ultimately, this is what fatherhood is all about. It's fighting for your kids and their future no matter the cost. And to me, you're just fully exemplifying that. There's so much more to talk about here. Final segment with Jeff. I don't know if we want to get into Dade feeling and people need to know about this guy in Texas. We can continue now with the precedent setting case that this is. Because I think that that's the big story here to me.

CHAPTER 32 / 41 Discussion

Elites and the Reverse Tyranny of Gender Ideology

The interview concludes with a discussion on "reverse tyranny," where elites use comfort and security to manipulate the middle class. Younger argues that gender ideology is a tool used by globalists to undermine the traditional family and break the political power of the middle class. He warns that the legal precedent set in his case will be used to export more children to sanctuary states.

klaus schwab· reverse tyranny· middle class· american psychological association· elites

1:59:10 It just so happens that it's you, you just happen to be that guy. You were the one in 300 million that is having to deal with this with your twin boys. And so now this is the precedent setting case. You're trying to warn Americans, here's what's going on. And overall, all things considered, all the juggling act that you have to do here, Where do you look at the interest here, the human interest, the American interest? How much is there? How much interest is there for common sense? Protect the kids, or do you feel completely overwhelmed by it? So, it's interesting. I find that the people that I talk to, even Democrats, don't believe we should do this to kids. Even pro-trans people don't believe we should do this to kids. This is elites pushing this.

2:00:02 And these elites have taken over professional bodies like the American Psychological Association, like the Texas Psychological Association, and have started to push this. An example here, if you bring a child who, for example, is uncomfortable with their gender, a psychologist in Texas cannot help that child identify with their biological sex. They consider that reparative therapy, and that's against their rules. A psychologist can only help your child to become transgender. So the last place you should ever take a child who's got discomfort with their gender or their social roles as a boy or a girl, the last place you should take them is a psychologist, right? But remember, these psychologists are testifying in court. And so they're making law in the court.

2:00:48 Cuz there's two kinds of law, there's statutory law, right? And then there's case law. And case laws is binding a statutory law. So when they make these cases like this Supreme Court case that I had to go through, this is binding law on the courts. This is binding precedent on the courts. And then anybody, whether it's a judge or a lawyer or in the jury, now they have this, it's like a safety net. Where they just say, well, yeah, I don't like what they're doing to kids, but not my fault. That's right, that's right. We have this precedent from the Supreme Court which says they can go and have into places where these harmful procedures are routinely given to children by court.

2:01:24 against their parents wishes, but the Supreme Court says it's okay and every lawyer in Texas now can use this case. It's just crazy to watch how this works and then to see people's compliance. And you sit back and you look at human history, everybody likes to talk about after World War II, obviously with the Nazis and everything. How does somebody like that? How does somebody like Hitler get so much control? How does somebody get so much influence? When you're watching it, you're witnessing it. Most of the time, it's people that just don't want to get involved. It's people that don't want to become obstacles. They just want to put their hands in the air and at the end of the day say, hey, it's not my fault. Yeah, it's the whole system is designed to make you very uncomfortable. It's what I call a reverse tyranny.

2:02:05 And a reverse tyranny is one where we don't actually put you in a gulag. Instead, we make you very comfortable and very secure. And when we want you to do something, we selectively remove that security to get you to act the way we want. And we can threaten you with removal of material security anytime we want. This is just a mechanism for them to threaten families with removal of their children. And that's what they've done. This particular court in Dallas County with Judge Mary Brown, she's a committed radical leftist. This judge just decided she didn't want my sons raised by a conservative and she wasn't gonna allow it to the point where she'll let him go to California and be chemically castrated and that's what I was saying earlier where it is

CHAPTER 33 / 41 Discussion

Financial Motives of Pediatric Transition and Lupron

Jeff Younger discusses the massive financial incentives for pediatric transitions, noting that a single "transgender" patient can represent $4 million in lifetime revenue for a clinic. He identifies Lupron as one of the most expensive drugs in the world. The segment ends with Younger expressing hope that his sons' natural instincts will eventually overcome the "operant conditioning" they are currently facing.

lupron· puberty blockers· barbie dolls· operant conditioning· money

2:02:44 Cutting off the nose to spite the face as they do this all the time the liberals these days will cut off their ear their nose They'll gouge their eyes out if it spites their face as long as it spites you too. Yes as long as you're spited That's right. You know there's a there's sure I'm blind and I can't hear and I don't have a nose or a mouth anymore But haha, I made you laugh I thought I was going to be alive living hell, didn't I? There's an old Greek proverb that two guys got into a feud and they had both harmed each other. And the punishment imposed by the wise king was that they both be blinded. Right? They both suffered from this. And the left is perfectly happy with that. If we're both blind, we're equal. And they're perfectly okay with that. It doesn't bother them at all. And it's just a shame that you're witnessing this play out in the legal process. Here's one of my, the questions that continues to come into my head, just trying to sort through this and make sense of it is, you know, what is the motive here? I mean, is it money? Is it access? I think about if I go for the worst motive,

2:03:42 I say they want access to kids. I mean that's what the you have perverts that want access to kids That's that's like the maybe the worst darkest potential motive But I think it's there and then the most obvious one is money, right? I mean these trans surgeries are not cheap the chemical the chemicals and the drugs are not cheap Plus you've got a customer for the rest of their life. So they're gonna be giving you money. So there's the obvious motive of money and then there's maybe the less obvious, more sorted motive of they want access to these kids. Yeah, the Lupron, which is the puberty blocker, is the most expensive drug in the world. Oh wow. Yeah. And it's made in one place in Israel. It's made there and it's the most expensive drug in the world. The other thing is once a child goes on these puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, they have a lot, the average lifetime income stream is $4 million to these clinics.

2:04:30 So, if you've got 3,000 kids, you can imagine how much money is at stake there. You're talking billions of dollars in this country alone. But I think there's an ideological reason. I think the reason Obama made the transgender procedures and made insurance companies pay for it, right? Which encouraged hospitals to open up the clinics, which created a market for it. And now you see that market. You see it's huge, it's huge now. This is the thing, they monetize it to make the market grow. That's why they do it. But I think there's an ideological reason here. Fundamentally, they know that the middle class in Europe and America have to be broken.

2:05:09 They can't get their reverse tyranny. As Klaus Schwab said, you will own nothing and be happy, right? They can't get that reverse tyranny with the middle class because these middle classes still believe in things like free speech. They still believe that they should be able to raise their children the way they want. And as long as you have a large middle class, it can't be dominated. It cannot be dominated because it represents the majority of voters as well. Right? So there's an attempt to undermine the traditional family, to undermine the political power of the middle class, to create a reverse tyranny. And I believe that is the basic agenda of the globalists towards the family. Transgenderism is one that's particularly potent.

2:05:49 Because if you look at the diagnostic criteria to be transgendered, for a child to be transgendered, it just means that they do some girly stuff. If you read the, it's, they just do some girly stuff. And you can be transgendered. And it allows a subjective psychologist to take away parental rights almost at will. Which is of course absurd, you know, and I think about your twin boys now, you said they're nine years old, right? They're ten now. Ten now. And so I think about it. I remember, and I hated this as a kid, but it happened a couple of times. I was probably like four or five years old and I had some older cousins, they're female cousins, and they like to play with Barbie dolls and do dress up. And you know what? They may grab little three-year-old Owen and say, hey, you're gonna be part of our wedding ceremony and you're gonna wear this tiara or something. And I'm going there, I don't wanna do that. They're older cousins, it's funny to them, whatever. Oh, so mom comes down and sees the cousins using me for their princess, you know,

2:06:45 movie theater wedding thing? Oh, I'm trans now. Like that's just, I mean, that's completely absurd, but okay, getting beyond that. They're of the age now too where, I mean, I'd say probably, definitely by the time you're 10, maybe by the time you're about six. I remember by the time I was in and through kindergarten, it was like, I knew what I liked. I knew what I liked. I started playing sports. I started riding bikes, street hockey. I was reading Sports Illustrated. Like, you know that, you know, you kind of figure out what you're into, what you like, especially by the time you're 10 years old. So, I mean, what do you think is going on right now as your boys are discovering their identities But yet also maybe feeling pressure not to be that. I think my ex-wife is using her medical and psychological knowledge to carefully condition my son's experiences to push them towards certain leftist ideas and leftist identities. James in particular, you know James has outright told counselors, they've said well why do you dress as a girl at your mom's house but not your dad's? And he said, mommy doesn't love me if I'm not a girl.

2:07:48 So there's a deep-seated operant conditioning that has happened with James. So I'm hoping that My you know the few years that I was able to expose him to masculine culture and to see why it's so great To be a man. I'm hoping that that will overcome it even in my absence or maybe also You know your your other twin boy just being into that as well I mean I had a couple I actually had a couple friends that were twin brothers when his triplet brothers and I'd hang out with them We all did the same thing. We were all into the same things sure absolutely yeah, Jude I never had the brothers of Jesus, James and Jude. Jude has a particular issue with the moral question because he knows his brother's not a girl. And he came to me asking me, well, when am I supposed to lie about it? When am I supposed to tell the truth about it? And for him, it's become a moral quandary that I don't think his mother is gonna do a good job helping him solve.

2:08:46 Well, like I said, my words, not yours, but I would probably be hoping that my two boys turn out to be very obstinate. I hope so too. And maybe that can be the best chance you have for them to come out of this all right. Jeff Younger, thank you so much. Thank you. Hey, great being on the Alex Jones Show and happy New Year's. Or as we say in Italian, Felice anno nuovo. But the way things are shaping up, it may not be a very, we should call it unhappy new year. I was listening to Owen and he was talking about how he knew who he was becoming as a young kid and what he liked the most. And this is my book, one of them, what Zizi gave Honey Boy. Zizi's the Neapolitan dialect for auntie. Zia's aunt, Zizi's your auntie. We used to have a TV show, Everyone Loves Raymond. And Doris Roberts,

CHAPTER 34 / 41 Discussion

Gerald Celente on St. Thomas Aquinas and Just Anger

Gerald Celente takes over the broadcast, quoting St. Thomas Aquinas on the morality of anger in the face of injustice. He criticizes the "slime balls" in the mainstream media and the political establishment, including Mitch McConnell and Chuck Schumer, for their roles in national decline. Celente argues that Americans have become immoral by tolerating the injustices shoved down their throats.

gerald celente· st. thomas aquinas· justice· mainstream media· anger

2:09:40 woman that played the mother. Her last starring role was playing my aunt in the movie Zizzi and Honey Boy. You can get it on YouTube. But she died, Doris Arbuth, 15 minutes into the movie. Well, it was 15 minutes into the movie, but the 15 minutes is up there. Anyway, so Owen was talking about, he felt what he liked the most in life as he was growing up, and I did too. And here's the book. And here's what I love the most. See that? I gotta take that picture down. Here we go. Here we are. It's me and Teresa McKelvey at our first communion. Look at how we're holding hands. We used to kiss in religious instructions. So in the Catholic Church, they tell you that you can receive the body and blood of Christ because you reach the age of reason at seven. I reached the age of reason at seven, and that's what I fell in love with.

2:10:43 I can't say that anymore. Anyway, I love her. Yeah, she moved away, broke my heart. Anyway, onto other issues. We're coming out with our top trends. They're gonna be published tomorrow. Top trends of 2023. You go to all the media, you know what they're talking about? This is what happened in 2022. You know who died? What am I kidding, who died? And my mother and father died. That's all I care about, and my brothers and friends. I care that the queen is dead. Long live the queen. Hey, Queenie, see you later. Queen, save your royalty crap for somebody else. That's the media. We're just a little bunch of nobodies. Do you know who died?

2:11:37 Yep, calm down, Sulejani, I keep forgetting. I have to keep swallowing their crap and I can't get excited. Yeah, I have to be a good nobody. There's a great quote I keep saying all the time by St. Thomas Aquinas. He who is not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral. Why? Because anger looks to the good of justice. And that's why I'm angry. I look to the good of justice that's being stolen from us. And if you can live amid injustice, if you can live amid injustice, all you little slime balls that swallow the crap that the mainstream media and little politicians shove down your throat, if you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as unjust.

2:12:34 And that's what this country has become, immoral as well as unjust. This Ukraine war going on. Yep, there it is. He was not angry when there was just cause for anger is immoral. Why? Because anger looks good and looks to the good of justice. And if you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as unjust. St. Thomas Aquinas. And here we are. No anger. You're not allowed to be angry. How dare you? Swallow our crap. Be a good American. Look up to Chuckie Schumer. Hey, how many chins does McDonald have out there? McConnell, Mitch McConnell, yeah, more chins than Chinatown. You're going to look up to him? No, I like Lindsey Graham. Oh, I'm so sad Nancy Pelosi left.

CHAPTER 35 / 41 Discussion

Nuclear Attack Preparedness and FEMA Advice

Celente mocks a Yahoo News article listing six US cities likely to be targeted in a nuclear attack. He ridicules FEMA's advice to "get inside, stay inside, and stay tuned," calling it "third-grade" propaganda. He argues that there is no real preparation for a nuclear explosion and that the government is merely trying to manage public perception of an impending World War III.

nuclear attack· fema· yahoo news· emergency services· urban targets

2:13:28 It's a freak show and the freaks are in charge. Great being on the Alex Jones Show. And again, Happy New Year everybody. And I make it say that because you gotta make it happy. You have to do everything you can to do something in a positive way to change the course of what's going on. United we stand, divided we fall. And one of the ways you do it is by supporting InfoWars. Because they're doing everything they can to fight for freedom, peace, and liberty. So support InfoWars, they have great products. I buy them, I use them, and it helps me and it helps them. It's a 360 win, so do what you can do. You know, this article just came out on Yahoo. A nuclear attack would most likely target one of these six US cities. Yep, there you go. Say 50% off, and we're gonna talk more about that.

2:14:21 And so do everything you can to support Infowars. A nuclear attack would likely target one of these six US cities, but an expert says none of them are prepared. An expert says, what expert are you talking about, you jerks? You can't prepare for this. There is no preparation, little boy with a bad attitude, for a nuclear explosion. No, so let he calm down and swallow our crap. Hey, watch the moronic little stupid ads They run in New York with that woman out there says oh, there was a nuclear explosion Now these are the things to do three steps to take yeah number one bend over and kiss you know what? Goodbye, how about that? Yeah. Yep. Oh

2:15:23 A nuclear attack in the US soil would most likely target one of six cities, New York, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Washington, D.C. But public health experts say any of these cities would struggle to provide emergency services to the wounded. What emergency services to the wounded, you stupid moron. What emergency services, you're dust, you idiot. You moronic little stupid freaks. And I'm saying this because one of our top trends for 2023, World War III, it's begun. You go back to our trends journal back in February 22nd,

CHAPTER 36 / 41 Discussion

World War III and the Ukraine Conflict

Gerald Celente declares that World War III has already begun, fueled by billions of dollars in US and NATO weapons sent to Ukraine. He criticizes Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the US Congress for prioritizing foreign war over the 63% of Americans living paycheck to paycheck. Celente characterizes the current political leadership as a "freak show" leading the world toward annihilation.

world war iii· ukraine· volodymyr zelenskyy· nato· congress

2:16:15 two days before the Ukraine war, COVID war, to Ukraine war, to world war. World War III has begun. The United States and NATO sending in hundreds of billions of dollars worth of weapons to a comedian famous for playing the piano with his penis, oh, and closing down the Orthodox churches, and celebrated at Congress

2:16:53 Giving him our money as 63% of Americans with paycheck to paycheck. They ramped up this war, America is at war. And you should hear his language too. People say about my language, you should go look at the clips of his language. Yeah, all the F words that he does as he's playing his role, but that's okay. This is the guy, this is the guy that America bows down to and sucks up to. There we go, boys and girls. There we go, all you libtard idiots. There he is, ladies and gentlemen and children of all ages. Step right up to the greatest freak show in the United States of America, brought to you by Congress. What a disgrace. I, Gerald Solenti, am a true American. These people

2:17:52 The Bidens, the Harris's, the repulsive kids and the Democrats are sellouts to the Congress of the United States that our founding fathers created. Yep, look at this. I mean, he shows up in his drag too, his costume when he goes to Congress. So you're preparing us for a nuclear attack, you got it? Nuclear attack in a large metropolitan area is one of 15 disaster scenarios which the US Federal Emergency Management Agency has emergency strategies. Who the hell are you talking to? Who are you talking to? I'll tell you who we're talking to, Celenti. We're talking to the idiots of America. The people that swallow our crap, the 88% that believe little Georgie Bush.

2:18:52 We're gonna get that guy Osama bin Laden dead or alive in Afghanistan. Yep, that supported that war. The Federal Emergency Management Agency. Okay, let's stop right there. Let's look at the little stupid arrogant clowns running this agency. And then look at all of the other great federal agencies that are run by imbecilic, moronic pieces of crap, one after another. I like the one that health guy, Rachel Levin, Lola, L-O-L-A, Lola. Yeah, I believe him. You're telling me some moronic government agency is preparing us for a nuclear attack and they'll know what to do? Let me get this straight, everybody. The people that are the bureaucrats are the dumbest imbecile, here he goes, Lola.

2:19:50 How can you swallow the crap? This guy, a health minister, a health director, he got more chins than Chinatown. By the way, Rachel, first book I worked on was called Natural Healing, 1980s. And I have an honorary doctorate from the National University of Health Sciences. So don't you tell me about health when you look like that. These are the imbeciles that are running us and ruining our lives. Happy New Year, happy New Year everybody. Oh yeah, watch the ball go down. Yeah, look at the little lemon head on CNN. Oh no, he was dancing, I forgot. This is the crap they're selling us. I'm warning you, I'm warning everybody. If we don't unite for peace, they're going to annihilate us in war. There he is. How can you listen to this little, how can you listen to this clown?

2:20:51 Oh, how about Anderson Cooper? A little daddy's girl, or mommy's girl. I forgot. Gloria Vanderbilt was my mommy. That's why I got in top. Like Justin Trudeau over there in Canada. My daddy was Pierre. My daddy was Pierre. Oh, I got Andy Cuomo over here. My daddy was Mario. Oh, Chris Crom, my daddy was Mario. Little Georgie Bush, my daddy was George. You got it? It's one club of imbecilic morons that are destroying our lives in front of our face and getting us ready for nuclear annihilation. Bye bye.

2:21:32 Yeah, a little true dope, a little arrogant boy. The Emergency Act he put up in Canada, putting people in jail, stealing their money. And we're gonna bring freedom and democracy to other countries around the world. Maybe I should start a new website, the Swallow My Crap website. I'll make zillions of dollars. I could sell crap drinks, crap head crap. Oh, and crap clothes. And I probably won't be able to win on that one because that's what everybody dresses like now in crap clothes. Style of America is gone, man. Or woman, or Rachel Lola. Save your own trip for yourself. I got my own. Don't you tell me to swallow your crap. I don't tell you what to believe. Don't you tell me what to believe.

CHAPTER 37 / 41 Discussion

2023 Economic Calamity and Commercial Real Estate Bust

Celente predicts an economic calamity in 2023, citing the end of "cheap money" and rising interest rates. He forecasts a massive collapse in the commercial office sector as remote work trends continue and leases expire. He notes that the NASDAQ is already in bear territory and warns that the worst market crash in history is imminent.

trends journal· jerome powell· inflation· commercial real estate· nasdaq

2:22:28 And if you want to believe the truth, of course, you subscribe to the Trends Journal, trendsjournal.com. No magazine in the world like it, history before it happens. So as all these clowns are talking about what happened last year, we're gonna tell you more about what's gonna happen next year and how you could prepare, prevail, and prosper. Because the worst times are ahead. And if you don't believe me, stay tuned to MSNBC. No, no, no, NPR, that's where you'll get it, NPR, yeah. Nothing, But crap, we'll be right back. Stay tuned. Hey, great being on the Alex Jones show. You know, before I go into more of the catastrophe ahead, I want to give you some information on some of the top trends for 2023. And one of them is going to be a economic calamity and a market meltdown. You go back to our trends journal about a month ago. We said if there's not a Santa Claus rally,

2:23:41 markets reopen. On January third you're gonna start seeing a big decline in equities now there are a number of sides to different stories so again there are a lot of wild cards. And when you look for example following the last forty midterm elections the S. and P. five hundred went up over 15% for the first twelve months but this time it's a different scenario.

2:24:18 Because the whole market situation was artificially pumped up with zero and negative interest rate policies in the United States, Europe and around the world. And governments pumped in countless trillions of dollars. They all did this to fight the COVID war. The people did everything that they were told because they were given free money, businesses got free money. It was a game. They artificially boosted everything now you go back I'm only speaking about the facts you had the fed had clown. Is Jerome Powell and Janet Yellen screaming that inflation was only temporary and then transitory. Going back two years ago wrote about it in details as I was saying it and then now they're saying that inflation was caused by supply chain disruptions.

2:25:20 There she is, Ms. Fatsia Brut, we're the same age, Marron Ami. Wouldn't be dating you, babycakes, Marron. Anyway, they put out the crap out there that it was only temporary and transitory, and transgender-tory to be proper. They either were lying or knew it was a fact, but they did this to artificially keep propping up the equity markets as they destroyed the global economy. And China, of course, has done its role in it too. They're in a disaster hit. You know, the businesses that have been destroyed in China with the zero lockdown, they're not coming back. By the way, the streets are dead. I went out New Year's Eve to a party and I came back a little after 12. And I was through 28 from Woodstock to here, which is the major artery going out through there. I counted five cars. I remember back in the day, 12 o'clock at night, the roads were packed. People partying. It's dead all over.

2:26:26 They suck the joy out of life. So going back to the markets. Here's the deal. The markets are going to crash and is going to be an economic calamity. Because I can't nobody could tell you. Yes or no about it. If the Federal Reserve when they have their meeting. And then on February first. They come out and say how much they're going to raise interest rates. Even if they raise them twenty five basis points. That will be.

2:27:05 enough to keep sinking the equity markets and the economy. Now let's go back to the story on the whole picture. All is private equity groups and all of these hedge funds that brought up all of these businesses merger and acquisition activity was at the highest rate ever. In twenty twenty one is that all this cheap money. Now those businesses are going down I gotta pay the loans on this own interest rates went up. Now you gotta pay more on your variable great loans oh and by the way. As interest rates go up the United States as what thirty one trillion dollar debt bubble. Oh and now you gotta pay more on your debt. Now let's go back to what happened to the equity markets. It was the worst downturn since the panic of a way. Two thousand and eight and by the way. The trends research institute which is the publisher the trends journal. Our company.

2:28:12 Took out the domain name panic of oh wait in two thousand and seven. You're seeing the nasdaq down thirty three percent. Deep in bear territory. S. and P. five hundred just hanging on a thread nineteen percent down bear territories twenty. The Dow's down almost nine percent. And you go around the world and you look at the at the broad indexes they're down like eighteen percent. interest rates going up the cheap money supply stopping. This thing's gonna go down big. And then the biggest bust is going to be in the office business office commercial sector. You're looking at places like Boston. With an office occupancy rate of 40% you're looking on average in the United States at best 50% now leases are coming up. The work at home trend is real and it's going to continue.

CHAPTER 38 / 41 Discussion

Historical US Aggression and Nuclear Propaganda

Celente critiques historical US military actions, including the atomic bombings of Japan and the "barbaric" bombing of North Vietnam. He argues that the current media narrative regarding Putin is hypocritical given the history of US-led wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Somalia. He warns that the public is being conditioned to accept nuclear devastation as a manageable disaster.

hiroshima· nagasaki· vietnam war· lbj· richard nixon

2:34:59 I was talking about before about that they're taking us to war in this moronic, idiotic, stupid article that is written by one of these articles, Business Insider, one of them. It's just stupid, stupid. But this is the way they sell, here we go, it was on Yahoo, by Aria Bendix and Taylor Ardrey. They go on to say, but according to every citizen, FEMA, this is the Federal Emergency

2:35:36 Management agency, yeah, FEMA. They give some simple advice, you ready? Get inside, stay inside, and stay tuned. They're still treating you like you're in the third grade. Get under your desk in case an atom bomb goes off. Stay inside, stay tuned. To what, to listen to more of your crap as you're melting away? So then they quote this guy, but according to Irwin Redlin, a public health expert at Columbia University. Yes, sir. You went to Columbia, you got a degree. What do you have to say? Well, here's what he has to say. Quote, it would not be the end of life as we know it. It would just be a horrific, catastrophic disaster with many, many unknown and cascading consequences. A clown ball, what do you mean it wouldn't be the end of life like we know it? What are you teaching at Columbia Kindergarten?

2:36:46 And that's all this school system is. It's a moronic brainwashing schools of crap. What stupidity, what stupidity to say this kind of garbage. Yep, yep. And all they're doing is selling propaganda. You ready? So the last couple of days, this is a front of judge report. Year end, Putin alone doesn't know what to do.

2:37:32 How do you know that Putin's alone and don't know what to do? You mean because he's losing the war? Hey, clown boys, where were you when George Bush was losing the war? You mean the Afghan war that went on for 20 years? Where were you little slime balls then? Every day, every day. George Bush wasn't alone, you know, no, because he had other slime balls behind him. Yeah, like penis Cheney. I can't say dick shady, cuz I don't wanna get censored. How about Condoleezza Rice, that next Mushroom Cloud? If only women were in charge. How about Colin Powell selling that colon of crap? One lie after another, but you little low lives, you little nobodies, you little boys with got size of mothballs, cojones,

2:38:39 You just suck up and bow down and throw out the crap that they give you. And the propaganda keeps going. You ready? Putin, this is from the Washington Post owned by Bezos. Putin, unaccustomed to losing, is increasingly isolated as Walters. Hey, how about Bush, unaccustomed to losing? I forgot. It was mission accomplished. I forgot. This is the way they sell propaganda. Hey, how about Obama's wars? I want that guy Qaddafi out of there. Was he isolated? One after another, you ready? Senseless barbarism, Russia pummels Ukraine's power in war sectors. Live updates, USA Today. And then this was on World Socialist website on December 29th.

2:39:50 50 years since the United States bombing of North Vietnam. Merry Christmas, RFK, not RFK, excuse me, LBJ, LB, jerk. I can't say the other word, but it's off over there somewhere in Texas. LBJ, Nixon, yep, how about you guys? 50 years ago in the last week of December 1972, that was Nixon. The United States military carried out one of the most brutal and barbaric attacks on a civilian population in history. Wrong, you forgot about Harry Truman, only killed over 200,000 innocent Japanese, bombs over Hiroshima. How about Nakasaki? Yep, okay, we're gonna take a break. We're gonna be back soon. Remember, Trends Journal, TrendsJournal.com and InfoWars, support them.

CHAPTER 40 / 41 Discussion

Origins of World War II and British Colonialism

Celente discusses the historical context of Pearl Harbor, noting that the US froze Japanese assets and cut off oil months before the attack. He also cites a study claiming the British Empire caused 165 million deaths in India. He uses these examples to argue that "mission creep" and economic warfare by global powers are the true catalysts for world wars.

pearl harbor· franklin roosevelt· british empire· india· colonialism

2:44:41 And I mentioned that they tell us that World War I began when they assassinated the Archduke Ferdinand Sarajevo. Like what's an Archduke and where's a Sarajevo? Who cares? It was building up to that because they could keep doing mission creep just like they're doing with the United States having quote, advisors in Ukraine not making that up. That's in the mouth of Lloyd Austin, our Secretary of Defense whose last job was sitting on Raytheon's board of directors, the second largest defense contractor. So it's mission creep. And the United States advisors are showing Ukrainians how to use our weapons, which means they're firing them basically, shooting at the Russians. So anyway, it's mission creep. It doesn't happen automatically. And then I said, yeah, like World War II began when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. And Judge Napolitano said, yeah, he said, but people forget what America did to Japan before that happened, and cutting off their oil. So I Googled up, I said,

2:45:44 Why did US put embargoes on Japan? And I got this from history today, this day in history. Here it is 1941. This is July, the Japanese bomb Pearl Harbor in December. On July 26, 1941, President Franklin Roosevelt seizes all Japanese assets in the United States. You ready? For retaliation for the Japanese occupation of French Indochina.

2:46:29 Okay, wait a minute. What do I care about what the Japanese are doing in French Indochina? What's a French Indochina? You mean the colony that the French went into Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos? And when I went to Vietnam in 1996, we were among the first Americans that went there after the war, they allowed in.

2:47:08 I went to the museum and here's the guillotines, the French cutting off the people's heads. What are you doing over there? And what do we care? On July 24th, Tokyo decided to strengthen its position in terms of its invasion of China by moving through Southeast Asia. And Japan followed up by occupying Cam Ranh Naval Base, 800 miles in the Philippines where American had troops and the British had bases in Singapore.

2:47:45 What are the Americans doing with troops in the Philippines? That ain't my country. And what are the British doing in Singapore? What's wrong with you, Celente? How dare you say that? The sun never sets on the British Empire. Why you should look up to Charlie boy who's playing? You mean the murderous slimy Brits? Oh, article just came out. The British Empire killed 165 million Indians in 40 years.

2:48:24 A scholarly study found that British colonialism caused approximately 165 million debts in India. This is caused by question everything from 1880 to 1920, while stealing trillions of dollars of wealth. This is a study done by Jason Pickle and his co-author Dylan Sullivan, published in the World Development Journal, academic journal. 165 million, so going back

2:49:03 That's what started World War II. What the hell, what are the French doing in there? Why do I care? Oh, I forgot about Vietnam. Because after the French left, then the Americans went in. America, the land of the free and the home of the brave, freedom and democracy, you're talking about the Russians? The Vietnam War, the Afghan War, the Iraq War, the wars in Somalia? The numbers came out, I forget how many hundreds that we've killed in Africa, getting ISIS this year, melting them down. And when I talked about Middle East meltdown, yesterday, Israel bombed the Damascus International Airport, killed a couple of soldiers and the airports closed down. They bombed the Aleppo International Airport too, back in September. Could you imagine if they bombed the airport in Tel Aviv? My God, how dare you? What hypocrisy going on? World War III has begun. If we don't stop this, they're selling us

2:50:08 They're selling us nuclear devastation over and over and over, getting the people used to it. Again, President Roosevelt swung into action by freezing all Japanese assets in America. Britain and the Dutch East Indies followed suit. You mean the Dutch East Indies? You mean those slime balls that were colonizing Africa and other places? Why, they're the Dutch East Indies, Solenti. It's been going on for centuries.

2:50:48 We got demonic people in charge. If we don't rise to heaven on earth, it's gonna be hell on earth. So support InfoWars, do everything you can. And again, you're gonna wanna read the top trends of 2023, they're coming out tomorrow. Trendsjournal.com, Trendsjournal.com. And it costs you less than the New York Times one day, it costs you less there for a week. $3 a day, we're less than $3 a week. We'll see. Thanks for tuning in. Happy New Year. We're not going to be here if we don't get financial support. I'm not bitching, I'm not complaining, but there's not a place you can spend money better to get great products at the same time that will keep truth and hope alive. And where this broadcast isn't just reaching the general public, it's reaching the intelligentsia of the planet. And it's recognized as one of the most bright spots against this tyranny. Boy, Alex, first I'd say that you're vindicated.