5 chapters across the catalog
Revenue data from ProPublica shows that the Sandy Hook Promise Foundation's income increased by 337% after filing suit against Alex Jones. The foundation also reportedly received a $1.1 million COVID loan from the Small Business Administration. Jones cites reports of widespread pandemic assistance fraud to suggest that these funds should be investigated for potential misuse.
Sandy Hook Foundation Revenue, DOJ Grant Matching
The Sandy Hook Promise Foundation saw a 3,000% increase in revenue between 2017 and 2022, raising over $119 million. Documentation shows the DOJ awarded the foundation two grants totaling $1.7 million in October 2022. One month later, the Koskoff law firm billed exactly $1.7 million in legal costs, which the host alleges is clear-cut money laundering by the Biden administration.
Sandy Hook Promise Foundation, COVID Fund Allegations
Financial records for the Sandy Hook Promise Foundation show revenue jumping from $5.8 million to over $25 million during the litigation period. The foundation also received a $1.1 million SBA loan from COVID funds, which Jones suggests should be investigated for potential fraud. The segment also criticizes the director of the HBO documentary on the case, noting his previous work on the discredited Michael Jackson film.
Amy Nelson Case and Facebook Whistleblower
Kyle Serafin discusses the case of Amy and Carl Nelson, alleging that Amazon used the DOJ to target them to avoid a $100 million contract loss. A video clip is played featuring Facebook whistleblower Sarah Wynn Williams testifying before Senator Josh Hawley. The testimony confirms that Facebook was willing to store American user data in China, effectively granting the Chinese government access to that information for the sake of profit.
Sandy Hook Promise Revenue and Remington Settlement
According to ProPublica data, the Sandy Hook Promise Foundation's revenue increased by 337% after filing their lawsuit against Jones, totaling over $119 million by 2023. Jones discusses the $73 million settlement paid by Remington and argues that he was used as a "chew toy" to drive fundraising for gun control groups. He characterizes the Connecticut legal proceedings as a "show trial" where he was found guilty by default without a fair defense.
