Topic: Prophylaxis

Dr. Alexander cites a 2015 paper by Ralph Baric and others that detailed the creation of a coronavirus for which there was no vaccine or antiviral response. He argues that the pandemic should have been managed by protecting the elderly in nursing homes while allowing the healthy population to develop natural immunity. He concludes that the current vaccine strategy has failed "out of the gate."

Dr. Zelenko provides general advice for those who have already taken the vaccine, suggesting blood thinners like aspirin for the first three months to mitigate clot risks. He explains that the long-term concern is not the spike protein itself, but the antibodies it produces, which could trigger ADE during future viral infections. He recommends aggressive prophylaxis and avoiding "booster" shots to prevent detonating the "immune bomb" created by the initial injections.

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko discusses the double standard in COVID-19 treatments, claiming that those in power use life-saving measures they deny to the general public. He asserts that early treatment with protocols he advocated could have prevented 85% of hospitalizations and deaths. Zelenko highlights that the CDC and FDA did not initially mandate vaccines for their own employees.

A meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials found that Ivermectin significantly reduces mortality and recovery time for COVID-19 patients. The study also reported that Ivermectin is effective as a prophylaxis to prevent infection. Dr. Kaufman argues that because a safe and effective alternative exists, the legal requirements for maintaining Emergency Use Authorizations for vaccines are no longer met.