Topic: Judicial Immunity

Viva Frye argued that judicial corruption is "contagious," with judges in different jurisdictions emboldening each other to issue unconstitutional gag orders and ignore legal precedents. He cited the E. Jean Carroll case as an example of the system changing laws to facilitate specific lawsuits against Trump. Frye suggested that the primary goal of these trials is to secure the label of "convicted felon" for political use.

The Brunson case seeks to challenge the concept of absolute immunity for politicians, arguing that such protections are unconstitutional when they conflict with the Article 6 oath of office. Loy Brunson points to California statutes that exempt politicians from perjury during their oath as evidence of systemic corruption. If successful, the case would make representatives legally accountable for their oaths, fundamentally changing the criteria for holding public office.