Topic: Jovan Pulitzer

Steven Gardner hosts a segment on the "engineered" 2020 election, citing the role of attorney Mark Elias in changing rules across 200 jurisdictions. He points to the federal indictment of Smartmatic for bribery in the Philippines as evidence that the company's systems are not secure. Jovan Hutton Pulitzer joins to discuss the Maricopa County audit and the "strong-arm tactics" used against conservative attorneys who challenged the results.

Jovan Hutton Pulitzer explains the difference between a "ticker tape" recount and a true forensic audit, noting that Georgia has never performed the latter. He alleges that 50 boxes of incriminating ballots were likely removed after an FBI tip-off to county officials. Pulitzer argues that "data is not evidence" and that only the physical paper ballots can prove the felonies required to overturn the election results.

The discussion shifts to the 2020 election, with Peters and the host agreeing that moving to 2022 or 2024 is pointless without addressing alleged fraud. They discuss the legislative efforts in Arizona and the work of Jovan Pulitzer. Peters credits Donald Trump with the "Great Awakening" but warns that the public cannot rely on the military or "Q" to save the country.

The need for a forensic audit of physical ballots, as proposed by Jovan Pulitzer, is emphasized to determine if they were filled out by humans or machines. Discrepancies in down-ballot voting are noted, where many ballots allegedly only featured a vote for Joe Biden. Solomon suggests that the algorithm was designed to allow some local Republicans to win to prevent them from banding together to demand a full audit.