Topic: Grifter

The hosts discuss the irony of being called "grifters" when they gain an audience and "irrelevant" when they lose one. They criticize former allies who have adopted neocon or Democrat talking points, such as using the Sandy Hook judgment or E. Jean Carroll case to attack them. The segment reinforces the commitment to open discourse and constitutional rights despite legal and financial pressures.

Harrison Smith defines "grifting" as saying things one doesn't believe for financial gain and argues that InfoWars is the opposite. He points out that his opposition to the Iran war has cost him followers and popularity among some Trump supporters. Smith asserts that the platform's positions are based on genuine conviction rather than what is currently popular or profitable.

The discussion addresses the controversy surrounding Candace Owens and her promotion of Mitch Snow, whom critics label a "verifiable fraud" and a con artist. While criticizing Israel has become more socially acceptable, the hosts warn that "grifters" are entering the movement to sabotage it with misinformation. Nick Fuentes is credited with challenging the Israel-first lobby years before it became a popular trend in the Liberty Movement.

The discussion focuses on the urgent need for mass deportations and the perceived "grifter city" atmosphere within the current government. Nick Fuentes praises Trump's rhetoric on Somalia but demands actual policy implementation, noting that the country is facing a fiscal crisis and a "debt bomb." The removal of Elon Musk from certain circles is cited as evidence that the establishment is resisting real, fast-paced change in favor of maintaining a collapsing system.

Nick Fuentes calls for immediate mass deportations and a total ban on third-world immigration, expressing skepticism toward Trump's verbal statements without policy action. The segment addresses internal Republican friction, including Marjorie Taylor Greene's resignation from certain roles, and the removal of Elon Musk from influential circles. Concerns are raised regarding government looting, the national debt, and the potential for a societal collapse.

Bevelyn Williams and Owen Shroyer critique the "pro-life right," suggesting some leaders were unhappy when Roe v. Wade was overturned because it removed a primary fundraising tool. Williams claims her protest was targeted because it successfully prevented 150 abortions in a single day. She contrasts her "loud mouth" activism with the "clean cut" image preferred by wealthy non-profits.

Drew Hernandez criticizes "alternative" conservative media figures who only support deplatformed individuals like Alex Jones when it becomes safe to do so. He labels these figures as "grifters" and "turncoats" who prioritize their YouTube revenue over the First Amendment. Hernandez praises Laura Loomer for her aggressive stance in exposing those within the right-wing establishment who capitulate to the Deep State.

Mainstream conservative media figures are accused of being "turncoats" and "grifters" for only associating with deplatformed individuals when it becomes safe to do so. These creators are criticized for abiding by YouTube's terms of service to protect their revenue rather than speaking the truth. The "long game" strategy used by some right-wing influencers is dismissed as a lack of authenticity.

Harrison Smith proposes an "Alex Jones is Right" jar to track the host's accurate predictions. He contrasts InfoWars with other "right-wing grifters," claiming that InfoWars is transparent about its funding through the InfoWar Store. Smith encourages listeners to support the network by purchasing supplements and $10 T-shirts, which he describes as an "invitation to steal" due to the low price.