Topic: 3 Rule

102 chapters across the catalog

Zachary Rehl details the procedural hurdles he faced while filing a Rule 33 motion for new evidence. He accuses the DOJ of attempting to stonewall the litigation of Jeremy Bertino's recantation by forcing the appeal to proceed without the new evidence. Rehl explains how he successfully petitioned the appeals court for an abeyance, which eventually led to the government's motion to dismiss the case.

A video report by Derrick McBreen examines the legal definitions of sedition and treason in the context of current political unrest. The report discusses the "3.5% rule," which suggests that a small percentage of a population protesting non-violently can topple a regime. It warns that obstructing federal law enforcement is a serious crime that could lead to deadly force.

Donald Trump is described as upending the international "rules-based order" to empower the U.S. dollar and stabilize the planet. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth contrasts this operation with the Iraq War, claiming the goal is stabilization rather than balkanization. Jones details how Trump used deceptive flight patterns and halted orders five times since Christmas to maintain the element of surprise and identify leakers within the Pentagon and Congress.

Donald Trump is pushing for the removal of the Senate filibuster to restore SNAP benefits for 40 million people, while Democrats maintain the shutdown as political leverage. The process of invoking cloture is explained as a 60-vote threshold required to end debate, which Jones views as a "speed bump" against tyranny that is currently being tested. Senior Democrats like Chuck Schumer are accused of holding the country hostage despite Republicans offering clean funding bills.

Ukraine is described as a CIA cutout rather than a democracy, with Volodymyr Zelensky accused of shutting down the press and canceling elections. The segment argues that democracy often leads to tyranny and mob rule, whereas a constitutional republic is designed to protect individual rights from the majority. The suspension of democratic processes in Ukraine is seen as a way for the U.S. deep state to maintain control over the proxy war.

The assassination of Charlie Kirk is framed within "big boy rules," suggesting that once an influencer takes money from globalist billionaires, they are "owned" and face lethal consequences for deviating. Kirk was reportedly beginning to question TPUSA transactions with the Republican Party before his death. The segment concludes with a call for strength and patriotism in the face of establishment corruption.

The segment examines Bill Ackman's public response to Blumenthal's reporting, noting that Ackman confirmed the existence of private meetings with conservative influencers. It also mentions a secret meeting between Netanyahu and podcasters like Tim Pool under "Chatham House Rules." Blumenthal questions why American media figures are meeting privately with a leader facing ICC war crime allegations.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser criticizes the federal intrusion into district autonomy, while Jones labels her a "Soros operative." The segment highlights the conflict over the control of the D.C. National Guard and the President's authority to override local officials during perceived crime spikes. Jones attributes urban violence to a lack of prosecution by local authorities.

Donald Trump officially invokes Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to take control of the city's police. He cites a tripling of carjackings and a murder rate exceeding major Latin American capitals. Trump promises that the National Guard will be allowed to do their jobs properly to rescue the city from "bedlam and squalor."

Senator Markwayne Mullin discusses Chuck Schumer's alleged demand for $1 billion in slush funds per nominee in exchange for allowing appointments. Mullin notes that Democrats have filibustered 131 nominees, with Marco Rubio being a rare exception. The host criticizes Mullin for praising Senator Thune, arguing that Thune's refusal to go into recess is the actual bottleneck for Trump's agenda.

Mark Lynch vows to restore the "rule of law" and investigate treasonous activities if elected to the U.S. Senate. Roger Stone is described as a "genius" who understands that Donald Trump makes the right decisions when provided with accurate, un-manipulated data. The segment concludes with a call for South Carolinians to support Lynch’s primary challenge to remove Graham, whom the host calls an "enemy inside our wire."

Former State Department officer Mike Benz revealed that U.S. taxpayer funds were funneled through George Soros's Open Society Foundations to distribute Saul Alinsky’s "Rules for Radicals" in Eastern Europe. The book is noted for its dedication to Lucifer, whom Alinsky describes as the first radical to win his own kingdom. This revelation has sparked concerns about government-sponsored ideological indoctrination using occult-themed materials.

Roger Stone discusses the "hysterical" reaction of the left to Donald Trump's executive actions and the perceived tyranny of lifetime-appointed federal judges. Stone argues that the executive branch has the authority to fire FBI agents and ignore unjust judicial orders that interfere with constitutional mandates. He also warns against establishment attempts to create jealousy between Trump and Elon Musk.

InfoWars introduces "Atomic Defense," a new supplement designed to boost the immune system during the winter months. The segment then transitions to a 2021 video of Judge Jack McConnell discussing "white male privilege" and the "testing" of constitutional values. Critics argue McConnell's rhetoric promotes racial division and judicial activism rather than the impartial rule of law.

Jones plays clips from the World Economic Forum (WEF) regarding the transition to a "new rules-based order" and warnings of a major cyber attack that could dwarf the COVID-19 crisis. He frames these developments as a spiritual battle, citing Psalm 2 to describe global rulers taking counsel against the Lord. He asserts that the public's awareness is currently "breaking the ribs" of the globalist controllers.

Jones and Comstock discuss the application of Saul Alinsky’s "Rules for Radicals" in modern American politics. They argue that the destruction of the family unit and the subversion of traditional values are key steps in a communist takeover. The segment concludes with a warning that the globalists are in the final phases of their plan to dismantle the United States.

Imminent Trump Victory Sends The Left Into Total Panic Mode As Polls Show Blue States Now In Play For Trump! — FULL SHOW 10/28/24
3:21:39 - 3:28:22

Imminent Trump Victory Sends The Left Into Total Panic Mode As Polls Show Blue States Now In Play For Trump! — FULL SHOW 10/28/24

Election Integrity and Democratic Primary Rules, Global Realignment

Del Bigtree recounts how the DNC changed primary rules in New Hampshire to disadvantage RFK Jr., illustrating the "rigged" nature of the system. Despite concerns about potential election fraud, both speakers express optimism about a "global realignment" toward truth and freedom. They argue that the current movement is too large to be suppressed by traditional establishment tactics.

A caller discusses Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" as the playbook being used by the Democratic Party to demonize political opponents. Another caller suggests creating time capsules with Bibles, Constitutions, and Alex Jones's archives to preserve them for future generations. Jones announces a 7 p.m. Central emergency transmission on the Alex Jones Network to continue exposing the "deep state assault."

Alex Stein suggests that Donald Trump should pander more to low-information voters by highlighting the $1,200 stimulus checks issued during his presidency. He argues that Trump needs to use "rules for radicals" to compete with the Democrats' promises of free services. Owen Shroyer counters that the "hard right" makes it difficult for Trump to pander without facing internal backlash.

The Dean of Berkeley Law School has argued that the U.S. Constitution undermines democracy, sparking a debate on the difference between a constitutional republic and a pure democracy. Historical examples from ancient Athens illustrate the dangers of "mob rule," where a simple majority could vote to execute or exile minorities. The U.S. Constitution is defended as a necessary set of guardrails that protect individual rights from the "mad howl" of the majority.