58:57 claim to care. They're not investigating. They're not asking the questions. They're not digging into that. Same thing with the pipe bomber. They're not digging into it. They're not asking the main questions. Obviously, they're not trying to find them. They didn't even do the geofencing. So to me, I just sit here and I say, hmm, okay. You don't want to go after QAnon, probably one of your own. You don't want to go after the Pipe Bomber, probably one of your own. That's my opinion, not Darren's. But what are you making out of all of this? From covering all of it, how do you even make sense of the lack of interest in the DC Pipe Bomber? Well, I mean, again, it looks very weird. And I'll tell you a story about the geofencing because, you know, I'm not an idiot. Like the idea occurred to me, why don't I, you know, try to replicate the, you know, 2000 mule strategy and do some geofencing on my own? Because there are a handful of sort of data service companies from which in theory, you can purchase that information.
59:56 You don't have to be a government actor. Governments are the primary clients of these services, but it's not a law that they can only do business with the government. In fact, many cases they do do business in the private sector. And so I knew that as a known quantity, they're probably not going to want to deal with Darren Beatty. All right, we got to take a break. This is so key though when we come back, because folks they're bragging about how effective the geofencing is to get J6 defendants, but why didn't it get the pipe bomber? Dr. Darren Beattie is with us from revolver.news, truly one of the great groundbreaking websites of the modern day, truly emerging as one of the greats, as is Darren Beattie. And Darren was just getting into how they were running some real world human intelligence down in DC in regards to this geofencing story, so people understand
1:00:47 They brag in Wired Magazine and all these leftist publications about their geofencing abilities to track and trace and get data on all these January 6th defendants, and they brag how they can pick one out of a crowd of millions on a day where there was no service, and magically they can use this technology, find all these J6 defendants. But when it's the pipe bomber, a crowd of one in a crowd of one alone in a night out in front of the DNC on camera, they can't seem to find that. So Darren was getting into that before we took the break. Darren, let's pick it up. Absolutely. So as I was saying, I tried to avail myself of the geofencing technology and it is available to the private citizens. It's more controlled, but there are a handful of companies that have this data
1:01:38 they can sell it if they want to. And knowing that I was kind of a public quantity and I might not have success approaching them as myself, I had a friend, a proxy who's done business with them before go and say, hey, you know, not much information on the political implications of the data, but just we'd like to explore the possibility of getting your geofencing data for this general area, this general time. And the initial response in two cases was, oh, this sounds great, shouldn't be a problem, happy to do business. The next day, and one case the same day, we get a follow-up message saying, basically, sorry, this isn't something we can work on.
1:02:34 No further explanation so yeah i don't know again what to make of that but like assuming that they did discover the on the political significance of this you think that it that one of these sort of data collection firms would be thrilled. To participate in a project that would uncover who this I bomber terrorist was when they be lauded as a hero when they get great publicity for playing a decisive role in figuring out who this person is wouldn't. the FBI give them a medal, you know, and for some reason they didn't think that would be the case. And maybe whatever reason that is, it's the same reason that the Democrats aren't joining me and saying, hey, FBI, why don't you release the footage of the alleged MAGA pipe bomber actually planting the bomb outside of the DNC headquarters? Maybe that's the same reason the Democrats don't seem to be interested in finding out who this is.
1:03:35 And why basically the public face, here's another thing, the public face of the pipe bomb investigation at the FBI, someone called Steven DeAntonio, his previous job was running the Detroit field office in the FBI where he oversaw the Michigan Feds. Fednapping plot disaster. It's literally that guy who after the suspected Whitmer kidnappers were arrested, the day after Christopher Wray propelled him to this coveted post at the DC field office when he went on to oversee things in the months leading up to and on January 6th, then became the public face of the Pied Pomp investigation.
1:04:21 This position he had at the Washington field office, that according to FBI sources is in a highly coveted position. It's something that McCabe had for instance, that is almost always a stepping stone for climbers into the coveted seventh floor at the Hoover building. And the fact that he quietly and suspiciously retires from this key post in the same way that he was quietly and suspiciously propelled to it from his job in Michigan, where he oversaw the infiltration operation of the Whitmer thing. It's really bizarre. And again, there are too many coincidences here, too much damning information, too many glaring discrepancies with zero explanation. And we know for a fact
1:05:13 The footage released by the FBI to the public was both censored by withholding the critical footage of the pipe bomber planting the bomb and tampered with. They reduced the frame rate to a rate of 1.2 frames per second, which is unheard of. And just to put a capstone on it, one reason they may be interested in lowering the frame rate artificially is that with a higher frame rate, you'll be able to see very clearly that the pipe bomber was using his or her phone and texting continuously, which would have established a narrative that there was a third party involved. And then the question, who was this third party? And also would make it very clear that, okay, it was using a phone, why don't you use geofencing?
1:05:59 Well, it sounds to me, the conclusion that I reach based off of what you just said, it's not that there's a lack of interest in finding the pipe bomber. They know something that we don't know about the pipe bomber. I mean, that's clearly what this says to me. Especially, I mean, it sounds to me, I don't want to put words in your mouth, but just listening to this story, it sounds to me like somebody behind the scenes got wind of you looking for this geofencing data and somebody in a real powerful position shut that down. That's possible, or the geofencing people looked into it a little bit further and they just, you know, people in these industries, they develop certain sensitivities as to where they're allowed to go and where they're not allowed to go. And maybe it was just that they sensed
1:06:47 You know, they didn't want to get involved. Maybe they had the right intuitions about what was really going on. I don't know. All I know is that multiple cases, and there are only a handful of these firms that I approach through a proxy who's not a political quantity whatsoever, someone that they should have been extremely comfortable doing business with. They got an initial very warm response, yes, shouldn't be a problem. And then shortly after, in one case on the same day, there was a complete about face saying, you know what, sorry, we can't touch this basically with no further explanation. And again, in light of all the other data points, all the other data points,
1:07:27 glaring discrepancies, all the other burning and really dark questions surrounding the pipe bomb issue in particular. It really doesn't paint a rosy picture as far as what Merrick Garland was up to, what Christopher Wray is up to, and what the disgraced and now recently resigned Steve Indiantuono was up to after having run the Fed-napping entrapment operation in Michigan. Well, and maybe the people that you reached out to for this geofencing Data, maybe they're aware of when you cross the Democrat Party a lot of times you end up in a casket Just ask Elon Musk. That's why he's telling people he's not suicidal right now because he's aware of that trend Darren I'd like to get one more segment with you We're about to hit this break any final words before we hit this break if you can't stick around
1:08:18 No, just go to revolver.news in the exclusive section and if you're interested, read our pieces on the pipe bomb. We have some really entertaining and fun and also informative videos illustrating the key theses behind this and share it. The public pressure is is really our only leverage in this case. The politicians will only follow up on things insofar as they think there remains public interest. And from Merrick Garland's position, from Christopher Wray's position, The one thing that they're counting on is for us to just forget about it and move on to the next thing.