Biden Joint Address, State of the Union Terminology Controversy
Joe Biden delivered a speech to Congress labeled as a "joint address" rather than the traditional "State of the Union." Critics argue this change in terminology signals an intent to dissolve the American Union and Republic in favor of a globalist agenda. Producer Scott Bronson noted that the administration avoids the term "Union" because their policies aim to bankrupt the free market and consolidate control through lockdowns.
joe biden· state of the union· joint address· republic· scott bronson· congress· free market
00:00 This was a declaration of war against what's left of the free market economy by the big mega banks, by big tech that are using lockdowns and shutdowns to consolidate control. After they bankrupt you, after they destroy what you've got to be self-sufficient and well off and upwardly mobile, they then offer you a tiny life raft the size of a postage stamp so that as you sink into oblivion, you won't be angry at them and they can cast themselves as the hero. They called it the joint address, even though for the entire history of this country it's been the State of the Union. Instead they called it the joint addresses of the State of the Union because they want to destroy the Union and Republic. And they can't do that if people still associate America with either.
00:51 Biden announces communist globalist agenda disguises democracy in address to Congress. From the front lines of the information war, it's Alex Jones. Tonight, I come to talk about crisis and opportunity, about rebuilding the nation, revitalizing our democracy and winning the future for America. I stand here tonight one day shy of the 100th day of my administration. 100 days since I took the oath of office and lifted my hand off our family Bible and inherited a nation we all did that was in crisis. The worst pandemic in a century, the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, the worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War. The worst attack on our republic since the Civil War. What a nightmare image of that
01:59 corpse that looks like he's been tarted up with some makeup. Stephen Miller called it like watching paint on the old side of a barn, but it's far worse than that. It's watching him rot. It's like watching the soul of our country rot. It's like the portrait of Dorian Gray, simply out of control and a total lie. We lost 750,000 people during the Civil War. Another million died of their complications. The next decade, it's estimated. Of course, more than 60 million people died in World War II around the world. We all know about Vietnam. We all know about the Cold War. We all know about the issues that have unfolded. But the statement that the worst attack on our democracy, whenever we're a republic, since the Civil War is just asinine.
03:04 In fact, that's soldiers that died. They don't have numbers on civilians that died, but it's estimated that millions died during reconstruction. Millions of people is a bigger threat to the country in a civil war that almost ended the country. It's a bigger threat than 400, 500 people going in the Capitol and maybe 20 of them having a fist fight with the police. And then one cop dies a few days later from injuries that were not sustained in the melee, but from a stroke. That's the reality. But my producer, Scott, made a great point. I kept asking myself, why are they calling it a joint address of Congress held on the same date as they hold state of the unions? It's because they don't want a union. They want disunion. Everything they do is about dissolving the republic. So they call it a joint address instead of the state of the union because they want to destroy the union and the republic. And they can't do that if the people still associate America with either.
