Friday, 26 August 2022

FRIDAY EMERGENCY BROADCAST: Biden Accuses “MAGA Republicans” of Political VIOLENCE Ahead of Midterms – FULL SHOW 8/26/22

The Biden administration telegraphs an October surprise while Big Tech admits to suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story under direct pressure from the FBI.

By The Alex Jones Show | 3h 2m listen | 43 chapters
FRIDAY EMERGENCY BROADCAST: Biden Accuses “MAGA Republicans” of Political VIOLENCE Ahead of Midterms – FULL SHOW 8/26/22 cover

About this episode

President Joe Biden and the White House are signaling a major October surprise by accusing MAGA Republicans of inciting political violence ahead of the 2022 midterms. Alex Jones and guest host Owen Shroyer analyze these claims as a potential precursor to deep state terror attacks designed to justify emergency powers and maintain executive control. The broadcast highlights the heavily redacted Mar-a-Lago affidavit as evidence of a corrupt regime hiding the truth about the FBI raid on Donald Trump.

Mark Zuckerberg recently appeared on the Joe Rogan Experience and admitted the FBI pressured Facebook to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. This admission of election interference coincides with reports from Boston Children's Hospital regarding gender-affirming hysterectomies for minors, which the show characterizes as a radical assault on children. Meanwhile, Dr. Jason Dean warns that the World Economic Forum is utilizing wearable tech like Oura rings and Fitbits for computational psychiatry and voice-mood monitoring. Additional reports cover the European energy crisis, the Biden administration’s student loan forgiveness plan, and the rise of Alex Jones’ book, The Great Reset, to the top of the Amazon charts.

Jay Dyer breaks down the Fabian Socialist model of technocracy, comparing current cultural decay to the British Opium Wars. Shroyer and various callers express frustration with Joe Rogan, labeling his interview with Zuckerberg a missed opportunity to hold Big Tech accountable for censorship. The segment concludes with a warning about the global food supply and the transition toward a social credit system powered by centralized digital currencies.


CHAPTER 01 / 43 Discussion

Deep State Terror Attacks, Biden October Surprise Prediction

Alex Jones claims the Biden administration and the "deep state" are preparing to launch massive terror attacks or mass shootings to blame political opposition before the midterm elections. He asserts that Biden's rhetoric regarding Republican violence is a "telegraphing" of an impending October surprise designed to maintain power.

joe biden· deep state· homeland security· october surprise· terror attacks

00:00 I just wanted to point out for the full audience right now, the full show headline on Infowars.com. We knew when Biden came out and said that Republicans would be violent before the midterms, there's only 70 something days left. That's the telltale sign with their whole Homeland Security buildup, January 6th buildup, same people that question elections are terrorists, people that question lockdowns are terrorists, that the deep state is definitely preparing to launch massive terror attacks, probably mass shootings of black people, you name it, by these white supremacist brainwashed teams they've got. All the pre-programming has shown that, we've known that, and this is their move, this is clearly what's happening. Just like the last month, I said it's imminent they're gonna blame Trump for the vaccine, even though he wasn't for mandatory shots or boosters.

00:41 That's why he should have got ahead of that. He didn't. I'm telling you folks, this is huge. I'll be filing special reports and I'll be popping in during all the great information that Owen and special guests are covering today. I'm behind the scenes making sure InfoWars continues on and stays on the air. A lot of stuff going on and I'll be briefing you on it soon. Whatever you do, realize this is the tip of the spear. It's a precious operation. We are not violent. You are not violent. We are not offensively starting anything. We're winning politically. We're winning culturally and that's why The deep state is not intending to give up power. So the big discussion for me that I'm going to be having today, just personally with friends and family and others and throughout the Sunday broadcast, the Monday broadcast, the rest of it is, Biden's clearly telegraphing so he can say, oh, he's such a great predictor when they launched the terror attacks to blame other political opposition. That's their October surprise.

CHAPTER 02 / 43 Discussion

Boston Children's Hospital, Gender-Affirming Hysterectomies for Minors

A recorded phone call features a person inquiring about gender-affirming hysterectomies for a 16-year-old at Boston Children's Hospital. Hospital staff confirm that the procedure is performed on minors and that they have seen patients even younger than 16 for such surgeries. The segment characterizes these medical practices as demonic child abuse and radical leftist propaganda.

boston children's hospital· hysterectomy· gender-affirming care· transgender· lgbtq

01:31 Rallying patriots worldwide in defense of human liberty. It's Alex Jones. Ladies and gentlemen, so far the 2022 primaries and school board elections have gone the way of conservative values, Christian values, American patriot values. And that's because Americans have realized what the radical liberal left has done to the education system, putting their radical ideology first and the education of children second. And it's gotten so bad now that they're openly sexually grooming children in classrooms and showing them pornography. But it's not just the classroom. It's now the health care system. Anything these perverted

02:24 twisted, demonic leftists get a hold of quickly goes in a dark position. Here is the Boston Children's Hospital bragging about how they like to chop up little boys and girls that they confuse with LGBTQ propaganda. Thank you for calling National Hospital. Your call may be recorded for quality assurance. I was calling for information about gender affirming hysterectomies. Okay, so gender affirming hysterectomy. I've been in touch with quite a few hospitals and a lot of them, well, they said they won't do it for my 16 year old and then I was told that this hospital might and I also saw it on your website

03:10 So if you guys do, do it for a 16 year old, I would be happy for you to come for a consultation or whatever it takes. Let me get you over to the operator and I hate to transfer you. I just, I just need to want to know if you guys do service that age you know before obviously before coming you know coming all the way for an in-person consult and going through all the paperwork and everything. Yeah it depends. Each department is different. Some departments cut off at 18. How old is your patient? 16. Okay, alright so they're in the clear. I'll email Dr. Call and see what we can do. In the meantime if you still want me to transfer you, I can still transfer you to surgery.

03:57 Hi, I was calling because I'm looking for information about the gender-affirming hysterectomies that you guys offer. Am I in the right place? Okay. Yes. This is the clinic. Did you want to make an appointment? So I was just wondering, I've contacted quite a few hospitals already. It seems like it's difficult to find one that does the operation for my 16 year old and I was told that you guys do do that. So if you do it for 16 year olds then yes I'd love to schedule an appointment, a consultation, whatever you need. If you don't mind me asking, what does your child's gender change into so I can point you to the right direction?

04:48 Yeah, well he transitioned to male. You know, he already had the top surgery and now we're looking for the hysterectomy. Okay, beautiful. So I'm going to transfer you to the GYN nurse line. One of the nurses will give you a call to give you more information and to let you know the steps. and the protocol that they do for that, okay? Okay. So they would do it for that age? Yes. Okay, great. Is it a common procedure that you guys do for that age? Yes. We have all different types of age groups that comes in for that. For the hysterectomy?

05:40 Yes, ma'am. Okay. Just out of curiosity, do you know, like, what's the youngest age you would do it on? I'm not sure, but I have seen younger teens. And I'm not, you know, being a hippo, I'm not allowed to say that, but I have seen younger teens, younger than yourselves. The under affirming hysterectomy surgery? Yes. Okay. Okay. I really appreciate your help. Notice how everything the radical left says is reverse reality. They call it gender affirming care. It's the exact opposite. Gender affirmation would be you look at your genitals and you know what biological sex you are.

CHAPTER 03 / 43 Discussion

Biden Administration Failures, Dr. Jason Dean Guest Introduction

Owen Shroyer, sitting in for Alex Jones, outlines the day's schedule including guests Dr. Jason Dean and Jay Dyer. He criticizes the Biden administration for low approval ratings, high staff turnover, and the President's frequent vacations. Shroyer argues that the Inflation Reduction Act and student loan forgiveness are attempts to buy votes that ultimately crush the American taxpayer.

joe biden· white house· inflation reduction act· student loan forgiveness· dr. jason dean

06:25 But they play games. They say gender affirming surgery. They say inflation reduction act. They say student loan forgiveness. All propaganda, all lies. And now a whistleblower has come forward and saying they're ignoring doctors warnings against trans kids. Ladies and gentlemen, Owen Schroer here sitting in for Alex Jones today, an honor and a privilege to be with you. Let me tell you what we have coming up today. We've got a guest joining us at one o'clock central. That is the second hour of today's transmission here on this August 26th, 2022 Alex Jones Show. That's Dr. Jason Dean who will be joining us on a wide variety of topics. Jay Dyer hosting the fourth hour today and then I will also be hosting the War Room and it's going to be the Veterans Call-In Show. So we'll be taking a lot of calls from veterans on the War Room

07:26 We'll be doing a lot of news coverage here on the Jones Show, may take some calls as well if we have time with the guest on the schedule. But here's some of the news we have. The Biden White House is just in complete embarrassment right now with their low approval ratings, their failed policy, their lack of support and popularity, the mass exodus of White House staffers in both the President's office and the Vice President's office. Joe Biden has already taken more vacation time than the last three presidents combined. He spent two of his months so far in office with more days off work than on work. And of course, he's back on vacation today, going to his beach front mansion in Delaware.

08:18 It's amazing, isn't it? Joe Biden pops back in from a vacation or a COVID bout, whatever, sick leave, signs the Inflation Reduction Act, crushing the American people. Then goes on another vacation, comes back from vacation, signs the Student Loan Forgiveness Bill or Executive Order or Dictate, crushes the American people again, screws the average American over, screws the taxpayer over. Trying to buy votes ahead of the midterm election. All these people see is politics, all these people know is politics. Everything they want to do can only be accomplished with a bigger, more intrusive, intervening government in your life. Stopping on your future, stopping on your prosperity, stopping on your freedoms. And it's really just getting out of control.

09:20 But now folks are really waking up to the diabolical nature of the left wing of America, the Democrat Party, radical progressive liberals, where they're sexualizing kids in the classroom. And let me tell you, these doctors, these doctors that are promoting Trans surgery for children are not going to get away with this. This is blatant child abuse Any other civilized society would view it as such and I believe when it when it comes down to the history books That's what it's gonna be written as if you're promoting that little children Come to your office so that you can mutilate their genitals and slice off their breasts You're the bad guy and what's even sicker is

CHAPTER 04 / 43 Discussion

Alex Jones Update, InfoWars Survival and Political Victory

Alex Jones returns to emphasize that InfoWars is the "tip of the spear" in a cultural and political war against the deep state. He reiterates his claims about Biden predicting terror attacks and states he is working behind the scenes to ensure the network stays on the air despite legal and political pressure.

alex jones· infowars· deep state· midterm elections· political opposition

10:16 Owen you're doing a fabulous job here today and obviously we'll be doing special shows throughout the weekend I'll be popping in throughout the broadcast today. You're doing a great job I just wanted to point out for the full audience right now the full show headline on info wars.com We knew when Biden came out and said that Republicans would be violent before the midterms the only 70-something days left That's the telltale sign with their whole Homeland Security buildup, January 6th buildup, saying people that question elections are terrorists, people that question lockdowns are terrorists, that the deep state is definitely preparing to launch massive terror attacks, probably mass shootings of black people, you name it, by these white supremacist brainwashed teams they've got. All the pre-programming has shown that, we've known that, and this is their move, this is clearly what's happening. Because like the last month I said, it's imminent they're gonna blame Trump for the vaccine, even though he wasn't for mandatory shots or boosters.

11:04 That's why he should have got ahead of that, he didn't. I'm telling you folks, this is huge. I'll be filing special reports and I'll be popping in during all the great information that Owen and special guests are covering today. I'm behind the scenes making sure InfoWars continues on and stays on the air. A lot of stuff going on and I'll be briefing you on it soon. Whatever you do, realize this is the tip of the spear. It's a precious operation. We are not violent. You are not violent. We are not offensively starting anything. We're winning politically, we're winning culturally and that's why the deep state is not intending to give up power. So the big discussion for me that I'm gonna be having today, just personally with friends and family and others and throughout the Sunday broadcast, the Monday broadcast, the rest of it is, Biden's clearly telegraphing so he can say, oh, he's such a great predictor when they launched the terror attacks to blame other political opposition. That's their October surprise. Owen Schroer. Alex, just be honest. You've been signing books for the last five hours and your hand is worn out.

CHAPTER 05 / 43 Discussion

Mark Zuckerberg on Joe Rogan, FBI Election Interference Admission

Mark Zuckerberg appeared on the Joe Rogan Experience and admitted that the FBI warned Facebook about potential Russian propaganda before the 2020 election. This warning led Facebook to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story. The segment criticizes Zuckerberg for repeating FBI lies and Joe Rogan for failing to challenge Zuckerberg on the implications of this censorship.

mark zuckerberg· joe rogan· fbi· hunter biden· 2020 election

16:12 So yesterday, Mark Zuckerberg was on Joe Rogan's podcast and some of the clips from this started to hit the internet while I was on the air. And so we played some of them, specifically Zuckerberg admitting that the FBI came to him and told him to censor information directly consequential or potentially consequential to the 2020 election. And I kind of saw it, and I gave Rogan a little bit of a hard time because it felt like he just let Zuckerberg off the hook with that. And then afterwards I was like, eh, I kind of feel bad because, and I still do this time to time, but I usually don't like to comment on things that I haven't seen yet. But you know, sometimes there'll be breaking news and I'll have to play it and the crew will play it and they'll bring it to me and it'll say breaking, so that was breaking news, so I covered it.

17:13 And I said, well, you know what, let me just go back and check. And so I watched the interview last night, and boy oh boy, I'm sorry to say this, but Joe Rogan cucked so hard for Mark Zuckerberg, it hurts. It hurts. Now I'm gonna play the clip and do the commentary afterwards. But here's Mark Zuckerberg admitting on the Joe Rogan podcast that the FBI told him to censor information on their platform so that they could help Joe Biden in the 2020 election. Now, Zuckerberg pretty much admits that, then tries to backtrack, and Rogan doesn't hold his feet to the fire at ever. In fact, he hits the feet with some cool water to cool the situation down. So here's Zuckerberg on Rogan yesterday. This is an extended clip.

18:08 admitting that the FBI engaged in a violation of the First Amendment, free speech, and told Facebook to censor news to protect Joe Biden. Here's the clip. How do you guys handle things when they're a big news item that's controversial? Like there was a lot of attention on Twitter during the election because of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Now let's just pause it real quick right here, because it's important to break down all the aspects of this. What does Joe Rogan say there? He says, how do you handle news that's controversial? What does that mean, controversial? How do you handle news that's controversial? So someone tells the truth and then someone just decides that's controversial and so now you have to handle it? Do we not see how dangerous that is? Who gets to set the precedent of what's controversial? So there's Rogan already taking the knee

18:58 for the chilling of free speech and censorship. Well, you know, it's controversial. Yeah, the Hunter Biden laptop is controversial. It shows the highest level of government with potential treason, the Biden crime family, not to mention whatever sordid activities Hunter Biden is into and potentially his father as well. But, oh, it's controversial. What do you do with controversial? Oh, it's controversial. It hurts the Democrats. So it's controversial. So here's Rogan already taking the knee for Democrat Party censorship. Oh, Hunter Laptop's story was controversial. Says who? What does that mean controversial? It's a real story. Oh, but it hurts the Democrats, so it's controversial. But all the fake news that they put out about Trump, I guess that's not controversial. Alright, continue. Yeah, so you guys censored that as well?

19:46 So we took a different path than Twitter. I mean, basically the background here is the FBI, I think, basically came to us, some folks on our team and was like, hey, just so you know, like you should be on high alert. We thought that there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election. Now pause it right there, pause it right there and rewind it because it's important to listen to what he says and the way he says it. He says, so here's what's going on in his mind right now. Zuckerberg knows that he's been caught red-handed with Facebook censoring information to protect the Democrat Party.

20:24 So he has to blame somebody else. So his first response is blame the FBI. But he's been trained by lawyers enough now when he does these big podcasts to know to kind of hedge his words and not say anything too damning. So what does he say? He says he's about to admit that the FBI told him the sense of the story, but then he's got the training to know, ooh, I can't do that. So he kind of has to back off. And he says, well, basically the FBI Was worried about election interference with information from 2016 so so he's about to pass the buck Saying that the FBI forced me to censor the story, but then he realizes he can't fully commit to that either Because then he'd be admitting admitting that how the election was rigged by the FBI and the Democrats so then he kind of backs off of that and he puts in

21:15 All these little legalese, like, oh basically this, oh maybe suggested that. No, let's see if you believe that spoken like a true politician. But listen to it one more time. So Zuckerberg is about to admit that the FBI told him to censor the Hunter Biden story, but he has to kind of hedge his words and back off of that because that would be too revealing. Here it is again. I mean, basically the background here is the FBI, I think, basically came to us. I think basically. Some folks on our team. Came to us. Just so you know, like, you should be on high alert. There was, we thought that there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election. Russian propaganda. We have it on notice that basically there's about to be some kind of dump of, of, of, that's similar to that. So just be vigilant. Similar to that. So pause it. So be vigilant. Okay. Okay.

22:07 So what is he, so now he's kind of hedged his words and he's backtracked, he doesn't want to fully admit the FBI told him the center of the Hunter Biden story, but that's what he just admitted. Because what is he talking about, Russian propaganda? What Russian propaganda? So he's lying about Russian propaganda or repeating the FBI lie about Russian propaganda that Russian propaganda was any information that was negative about Hillary Clinton in 2016. So that's just a lie. So that's the FBI lying to Zuckerberg and then Zuckerberg repeating the lie like a good deep state regime parrot boy. Oh yeah, 2016 Russian disinformation affected the outcome for Hillary. All a lie. The Mueller investigation actually showed that Russia spent more money to try to get Hillary into office. And of course they did!

22:55 Who do you think Russia wants in office? Democrats or Republicans? What does Russia do when Democrats are in office? They go into Ukraine and take their land back. What do the Russians do? What does Putin do when Republicans are in office? Nothing! They don't move in on Ukraine at all! But when Obama was in office for eight years, they moved into Ukraine. As soon as Biden got into office, they moved into Ukraine. Who do you think the Russians really want in office? Since Biden got into office, Russia's never been more powerful on the world stage in modern history. Putin's never been more influential and powerful on the world stage in modern history. Who do you think the Russians really want in office? Republicans or Democrats? Democrats. We all know that. They're lying about that.

23:36 But so there's Zuckerberg. Well the FBI I think basically came to us. Okay let's translate that. The FBI came to you and was telling us about the 2016 Russian disinformation. Oh what Russian disinformation? You mean the Russians trying to get Hillary into office according to the Mueller report that you wanted to ignore as soon as the truth came out? Yes. And so what are you equating that to? Obviously it's the Hunter Biden laptop story. That's what Joe Rogan brought up. And I'm going to continue this on the other side because it's important to break this down. But, okay, so we're not fully to the full Rogan cuck yet. You might say, ooh, good job, Joe. You just forced Zuckerberg into admitting that the FBI censored news, but he's not gonna put him on the mat and go for the three count after that. No, Rogan's gonna extend his hand to Zuckerberg and try to lift him up off the mat to save him from what he just admitted. And it's pathetic.

CHAPTER 06 / 43 Discussion

Mar-a-Lago Raid Affidavit, Government Corruption Criticism

The segment highlights the heavily redacted affidavit related to the FBI raid on Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate. The host characterizes the redactions as proof of a corrupt political regime hiding the truth from the American people while pretending to be transparent.

donald trump· mar-a-lago· fbi· affidavit· redactions

24:39 And that's coming up after this short break on the Alex Jones Show. There's your Trump-Mar-a-Lago rate affidavit right there. And remember, they said Trump doesn't want you to see this. Trump is afraid. He doesn't want you to see the affidavit. They lied. They never gave it to Trump. And then they redacted it down to almost nothing. There you go, folks. There's our corrupt government. There's our corrupt Democrat Party. There's our corrupt political regime just pissing in our face once again with the fake news mainstream media. Well, you know what I say?

25:36 I can't say it because I'm on the radio, but fire truck all of you. How about that? How about fudge every single last one of you corrupt bastards that lies to us 24-7 and then hides the truth. You are the most un-American, communist, authoritarian, tyrant scumbags this side of the earth has ever seen. Now, getting back to the Rogan issue. So let's pick it up where we left off. Rogan refuses to hold Zuckerberg's feet to the fire after he admits that the FBI told them to censor the Hunter Biden story. Zuckerberg flopping around like a fish out of water, embarrassed that he just admit that.

CHAPTER 07 / 43 Discussion

Facebook Algorithm Throttling, Hunter Biden Laptop Suppression

Mark Zuckerberg explains the technical process of how Facebook decreased the distribution of the Hunter Biden laptop story for several days while third-party fact-checkers reviewed it. He admits the story turned out to be real but defends the "process" as reasonable. The host argues this was a deliberate act of election rigging coordinated between the FBI and Big Tech.

facebook· algorithms· fact-checking· hunter biden· censorship

26:27 On the mat, ready to be pinned, and instead, Rogan is going to reach his hand out and offer Zuckerberg a hand up so that he can make sure to continue the censorship against the Republican Party and conservatives for the corrupt political regime. And so the interview continues. ...said you can't share this at all. We didn't do that. What we do is we have If something is reported to us as potentially misinformation, important misinformation, we also have this third party fact checking program because we don't want to be deciding what's true and false. Pause it right there. So that's a cop out. We all know that all the fact checkers are liberal Democrats. That's been totally proven. Oh, it's third party. No, it's not. No, it's not. You reach right down your pants, you grabbed a couple dingleberries and you call them fact checkers. Continue.

27:22 I think it was five or seven days when it was basically being determined whether it was false. The distribution on Facebook was decreased, but people were still allowed to share it. So you could still share it, you could still consume it. So when you say the distribution has decreased, how does that work? Basically, the ranking in News Feed was a little bit less. So fewer people saw it than would have otherwise. So it definitely... By what percentage? I don't know off the top of my head, but it's meaningful. But basically... So let me translate that because Rogan's going to let Zuckerberg get away with it again. Let me translate what Zuckerberg just said. They have algorithms at Facebook that determine what the top news stories are based on shares and likes and interactions, basically.

28:14 And so the Hunter Biden laptop story was one of the top stories for a week. So Facebook went in there, not knowing if it was real or not, he just admitted, and actively censored it and changed the algorithms to make sure that the Hunter Biden laptop story would not be a top trending story, even though it was, and they didn't know whether it was real or not. But that wasn't enough for the FBI. The FBI and the Democrats had to come in and tell Facebook, no, you're going to censor that story, which Zuckerberg admitted previously. Let's continue. A lot of people are still able to share it.

28:52 We got a lot of complaints that that was the case. You know, obviously this is a hyper political issue. So depending on what side of the political spectrum you either think we didn't censor it enough or censored it way too much. But we weren't sort of as black and white about it as Twitter. We just kind of thought, hey, look, if the FBI, which I still view is a legitimate institution in this country. It's a very professional law enforcement. They come to us and tell us that we need to be on guard about something, then I want to take that seriously. Alright, pause it right there. Well, that's all you need to know. Guys, rewind it five seconds. That's all you need to know. Oh, Mark Zuckerberg trusts the FBI. Yeah, okay, buddy. What, do you work for the FBI? But so what does he do again? He admits they centered the Hunter Biden laptop story even though they didn't know if it was real or not. And then he blames the FBI

29:39 Even though he claims the FBI didn't specifically tell him to censor anything. As if that's how it works. The FBI just shows up and says, hey, there might be some misinformation out there. There might be Russian propaganda out there. We don't know what it is, but just keep your eyes out. Wink, wink. Yeah, that's how the FBI works. They just walk into Facebook and say, look out for Russian disinformation. As if Facebook wouldn't say, really? What disinformation? How do we know? How do we know? No. The FBI came to Facebook and specifically said, do not share the Hunter Biden laptop story, censor the Hunter Biden laptop story because it will hurt the Democrats. But they say, it's Russian propaganda, it's not real. No, it is real.

30:23 And now the FBI is admitting that they knew it was real the whole time. Because an FBI whistleblower has come forward and said they knew the Hunter Biden laptop was real, but they didn't want to investigate it or admit it was real at the fear that it could change the 2020 election results. Really? Finding out how corrupt the Biden family is would change the results? Go figure. But their notion was, well, when we did the ceremonious exoneration campaign, that's the FBI, James Comey, pretending to investigate Hillary Clinton's emails. They never did. It was all fake so that they could exonerate Hillary to the public before the election. But they say, oh, that cost Hillary the election. So we at the FBI, we don't want to engage that and cost a Democrat the election again. And of course, that's all lies. So again, so where are we at now?

31:12 Zuckerberg has admitted the FBI told him to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story on Facebook, so he's blaming the FBI and then he's saying, oh, but Twitter was worse than us. Twitter just outright banned it. We just made sure it couldn't trend organically like it was. And still Rogan has not held his feet to the fire yet at all. He's on the mat, he's down for the 10 count, and now Rogan is about to offer him the hand up. Let's continue. Few is a legitimate institution in this country. What are you a fed? Law enforcement knows the FBI comes us and tell us that we need to be on guard liberals used to tell us the FBI was corrupt Lee did they specifically say you need to be on guard about that story I Know I don't remember if it was that specific closet. You know he's lying. No well. I don't know specifically he's lying the answer is obviously yes

32:07 No. Well, I don't know. What follows that? Yes. Unbelievable. Continue. Pattern. When something like that turns out to be real. Here, wait, wait, pause it again and rewind it because there's another important part there. Because he says no, and then he moves closer to the truth and he says, well, I don't know. And then he basically says yes, but he uses a different phrase to say yes. So I talked over it. Here, play it again. We got a lot of complaints that that was the case. You know, obviously this is a hyper-political issues, so depending on what side of the political spectrum you either think we didn't censor it enough or censored it way too much, but we weren't sort of as black and white about it as Twitter. We just kind of thought, hey look, if the FBI, which I still view as a legitimate institution in this country, it's like very professional law enforcement, they come to us and tell us that we need to be on guard about something, then I want to take that seriously. Did they specifically say you need to be on guard about that story?

33:03 No, I don't remember if it was that specifically, but it basically fit the pattern. Something like this, it fit the pattern. What does that mean? No, I don't remember. Well, it fit the pattern. He's saying yes, it fit the pattern. What does that mean? That means yes. They said it's gonna be something about the Bidens. They said it's gonna be something to hurt the Democrats. And they said it's probably going to be the Hunter Biden laptop story, but it's Russian propaganda so censor it. So Zuckerberg has just admitted, folks this is such a violation of the First Amendment. This is such communistic tactics. This is such authoritarian, totalitarian corruption. This should be a huge news story that the FBI is now meddling in US elections. Forget about Russia.

33:57 Our own FBI is rigging elections with big tech. That's collusion. That's fascism. All you anti-fascists out there with your masks and your street signs, here's your fascism, the Democrat Party, the FBI, and big tech colluding to rig elections by censoring real news and calling it disinformation on the internet. So we are now at the point of the interview where Joe Rogan has Mark Zuckerberg dead to rights admitting that Facebook engages in political censorship at the behest of the FBI and the Democrat Party. The very definition of fascism right there. Corruption, collusion, all of it to rig elections. And Joe Rogan has Zuckerberg on the mat and he could pin him. Let's find out what Joe Rogan does next.

34:54 But it basically fit the pattern. When something like that turns out to be real, is there regret for not having it evenly distributed and for throttling the distribution of that story? What do you mean evenly distributed? I mean, evenly in that it's not suppressed. Yeah, yeah. I mean, it sucks. Yeah. Because it turned out, after the fact, the fact checkers looked into it, no one was able to say it was false. So basically, it had this period where it was getting less distribution. So yeah. But I think it probably sucks though, I think in the same way

35:36 that probably having to go through like a criminal trial but being proven innocent in the end sucks. Like it still sucks to have- Now he's just dizzied. That you had to go through a criminal trial but at the end you're free. He's flopping like a fish out of water now. So it's, I don't know if the answer would have been don't do anything or don't have any process. I think the process was pretty reasonable. You know, we still let people share it. Alright, pause it right there. So again, okay, the process was reasonable. So let's pick up where we're at now and rewind it five seconds. Oh, the process was reasonable. Well, it was the process. The Democrat Party told the FBI to go tell Facebook to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story. And Facebook did it. That was the process. And Facebook is, of course, flailing around, oh, we know nothing. We just want to help people. Oh, we don't know anything. Oh, what? No, they know exactly what they did. But what does Zuckerberg say now?

CHAPTER 08 / 43 Discussion

Joe Rogan Criticism, Cucking for Mark Zuckerberg

Owen Shroyer expresses deep disappointment in Joe Rogan, accusing him of "cucking" for Mark Zuckerberg by offering him a "hand up" instead of pinning him on the admission of election meddling. Shroyer argues that Rogan's neutrality and refusal to hold Zuckerberg's feet to the fire is a betrayal of the American man and the First Amendment.

joe rogan· mark zuckerberg· free speech· first amendment· censorship

36:28 So Joe Rogan now gives him the- again, Zuckerberg is- he's dazed, he's confused, he's on the mat, you can pin him for the championship and Rogan would rather offer him a hand up and you're about to see that. But okay, so Zuckerberg now admits, we got it wrong. The Hunter Biden laptop story was real, we censored real news, we feel bad about it. Really? What do you feel bad about Zuckerberg? Because notice, Joe Rogan isn't going to hold his feet to the fire on this one either. What is it that you feel bad about Mark that you censored real news? That you helped rig and influence an election and if you do feel so bad about that Why not issue an apology kind of a big deal in it? You know and information to protect the Democrats and and and you don't even want to offer an apology now. Hey Owen Alex Jones here popping in

37:21 The big thing for me here is this admits election meddling by the rogue Justice Department against Trump, not just directing Facebook but all the other big tech to take it down. That's why when they said earlier this year that the disinformation office had already been operating for years, but then lawsuits got filed because it's the government directly censoring, Well, this admits the collusion between big tech and the corporate media and the FBI literally directing the censorship. This is the admission of election meddling cut and dry on top of the voting machines and the mail-in ballots. This is the admission of the Justice Department election meddling in America. It's incredible stuff. And Rogan has Zuckerberg on the map and he's about to offer him the hand up. So guys, let's pick it up where we left off.

38:05 Process I think the process was pretty reasonable. You know it's we still let people share it, but but obviously you don't want situation Democrats and big tech more reasonable than Twitter stance, and it's probably also the case of our Begins I rewind it again rewind it again to win to win Joe's about speak and so now the hand up begins Oh, it was much more reasonable than than Twitter Oh, the process was fair, you know. We feel bad about rigging an election with the Democrat Party and the FBI, but we're... Well, would you like to apologize? Well, no, we don't want to apologize. We tried our best. And Joe Rogan says, yeah, you're right. You tried your best and you did better than Twitter too. So here's Zuckerberg. He's dizzy. He's on the mat and Rogan can pin him and win the championship. And instead he's going to cuck and shrink and offer Mark Zuckerberg to hand up as he's flailing on the ground. So it begins. People share it, but

39:02 But obviously you don't want situations like that. But certainly much more reasonable than Twitter stance. And it's probably also the case of armchair quarterbacking, right? Or at least Monday morning quarterbacking, I should say. Because in the moment, you had reason to believe, based on the FBI talking to you, that it wasn't real and that there was going to be some propaganda. So what do you do? Yeah. And then if you just let it- Now pause it, this is key. Pause it, but this is key right here. So both parties, Rogan and Zuckerberg, are now admitting that the FBI directly came to Facebook and said, center the Hunter Biden laptop story. That's what Joe Rogan is saying. That's what Zuckerberg just admitted to. Guys, rewind it 10 seconds and listen to that again with that context. Now, Joe Rogan is directly inferring that the FBI told Zuckerberg and Facebook to center the Hunter Biden laptop story.

39:58 And Zuckerberg does not deflect and actually agrees, even though he tried to act like that wasn't the case earlier. Listen to it now with that context. you had reason to believe, based on the FBI talking to you, that it wasn't real. And that there was going to be some propaganda. So what do you do? And then if you just let it get out there, and what if it changes the election and it turns out to be bullshit? That's a real problem. And I would imagine that those kind of decisions are the most difficult.

40:40 the decisions of like what is allowed and what is not allowed. Yeah, I mean what would you do in that situation? I don't know what I would do. I would have to like really thoroughly, well first of all You're dealing with the New York Post, which is one of the oldest newspapers in the country. So I would just say I would want to talk to someone from the New York Post and I would say how did you come up with this data? Like where where are you getting the information from? How do you know whether or not this is correct? Pause it right here. So this is where Rogan is starting to cuck like a little bitch. Oh, why don't you go check with the New York Post if it's real or not? Really? Do they do that about every story? I'm just curious. Does Facebook call the sources for every story to see if it's real? I doubt it. I doubt it. And let's keep in mind, we're still talking about one story, the Hunter Biden laptop story. That's what we're talking about. Everybody knows it.

41:38 Oh, but we're just Monday morning quarterbacking. Oh, how could we know? Oh, we trust the FBI. We gotta go check every source of every story. Bullcrap. Rogan knows what happened. The Democrats and the FBI told Facebook and Twitter and YouTube and everyone else to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story because it would cost Joe Biden the election. That is on the table, that's the discussion, and Rogan lets Zuckerberg and Facebook get away with it. But it gets even worse from Rogan. Continue. Then you have to make a decision because they might have got duped. It's very

42:18 It's hard because everybody wants to look at it after the fact. Now that we know that the laptop is real. Oh, they got duped. So the same people get duped every single time, don't they, Joe? They just get duped every single time, Joe, and we have no idea. Oh, it's not political. Oh, it's not censorship. It's just Monday morning quarterback. They just got duped. They fell for it. They trusted the FBI. Pathetic. Continue. It's hard because everybody wants to look at it after the fact. Now that we know that the

43:01 Laptop was real. And positive, positive. No Joe, actually no Joe, no Joe, no, not everybody had to look at it after the fact. Most people looked at it at face value and knew it was real. Not everybody had to look at it after the fact. We all knew it was real. The New York Post knew it was real. The Bidens knew it was real. The FBI knew it was real. Facebook knew it was real. You knew it was real. Oh, we didn't know. We got duped. Oh, Monday morning quarterback. Oh my gosh. Continue. And there is potential corruption involved with him. Potential? We think, oh, that should not have been restricted. That should not have been banned from sharing on Twitter. Right. I think everybody agrees with that. Even Twitter agrees with that. But the thing is, then they didn't think that. In the beginning, they thought it was fake. Oh, pause it right there. Oh, wow. Where have we heard that before?

43:57 Oh, well they thought it was fake. They thought it was their truth. Really? Oh, I see. I see. But when Alex Jones is on the stand in a courtroom, supposedly a fair and balanced justice system, the judge points the finger at Alex Jones and says, just because you think it's real doesn't mean it is. Oh, but, oh, big tech and Twitter and Facebook and the FBI and everybody else. Well, we thought the laptop was fake. We thought we didn't know anything. It was our truth at the time. You can't be mad at me. I thought it was real. But if Alex Jones ever gets anything wrong, crush him and shut him down. And I'm Joe Rogan because I'm Alex Jones' friend, but I won't stick up for him now. The cavalry for your immune system.

CHAPTER 09 / 43 Discussion

Republican Scheme Hypothetical, Rogan Democrat Talking Points

The host analyzes a moment where Joe Rogan uses a hypothetical "Republican scheme" to explain why a platform might censor information. Shroyer suggests that Rogan may have been fed Democrat talking points, noting that it is primarily the left calling for censorship in the current political climate.

joe rogan· republicans· democrats· propaganda· censorship

45:43 Ladies and gentlemen, this is a symbiotic relationship. Supporting Infowars defeats the globalist, and this product does amazing things for your body. Take action now. So let's go back to now Mark Zuckerberg and Joe Rogan on the Joe Rogan experience. It comes along and the Republicans cook up some scheme to make it look like Joe Biden's a terrible person, and they only do it so that they can win the election, but it's really just propaganda. Oh, pause it right there. Now notice, now see, now is where I get real skeptical. Why does Rogan use the Republicans as an example when it's the Democrats every time? Boy, I sure hope Joe Rogan isn't getting some Democrat in his ear telling him what to say. Boy, I hope that's not the case because at this point it sure seems like it, doesn't it? At this point now, it sure seems like the Democrats are giving Joe Rogan talking points where he uses an example saying, the Republicans make things up, so what are you supposed to do? Really? What do the Republicans make up? Actually, it's the Democrats that make everything up.

46:43 Trump-Russia collusion, all the other fake Trump stories, I mean, literally they just lie 24-7. Jussie Smollett, 81 million votes, I mean, just the lies and the lies and the lies. But then what does Rogan do? He uses a Republican faking news on social media as the example. I don't think that that was organic. I feel like he might have been put up to that. I could be wrong, but that's what it feels like. Let's continue. What to do with that? You're supposed to not allow that to be distributed. So if they think that's the case, it makes sense to me that they would try to stop it. But I just don't think that... So here, let's rewind that, guys, rewind it to the very beginning. So here's Rogan saying, well, Republicans fake news, so you have to censor it. Why would he say that?

47:27 Why would Joe Rogan say that? It doesn't really make sense unless he was told to. Maybe that's really where Joe Rogan decided to go with this, but he just says, well, Republicans fake news, you're supposed to censor it. So listen to that one more time. I would say, I would want to talk to someone from the New York Post and I would say, how did you come up with this data? Like where are you getting the information from? How do you know whether or not this is correct? And then you have to make a decision. Because they might have got duped. It's very hard. It was the Hunter Biden laptop story. They were told to censor it. They did it because they're all Democrats. Laptop was real and it was a legitimate story. And they lie. There is potential corruption involved with him.

48:13 We think, oh, that should not have been restricted. That should not have been... So now who tells them to say this next line? Right. I think everybody agrees with that. Even Twitter agrees with that. But the thing is, then they didn't think that. In the beginning, they thought it was fake. So what do they do? Like if something comes along and the Republicans cook up some scheme to make it look like Joe Biden's a terrible person, and they only do it so that they can win the election, but it's really just propaganda. Except that's literally what Democrats do. What are you supposed to do with that? You're supposed to not allow- So pause it. So that's literally what Democrats do, and then Joe Rogan says it's Republicans doing that, even though the entire context of this interview right now is the Democrats doing just that. But he says Republicans do it. Okay, gotcha. Continue. To be distributed. So if they think that's the case, it makes sense to me.

49:05 that they would try to stop it, but I just don't think that they looked at it hard enough. When the New York Post is talking about it, you know, they're pretty smart about what they release and what they don't release. If they're going over some data from a laptop and you could talk to a person. But again, like this is just one story, like one individual story. Like how many of these pop up every day? One story. Especially regards to polarizing issues. Why this one story? Like climate change or COVID or, you know, foreign policy or Ukraine. And both Joe and Mark know it and they won't be honest with you. Because they're lying. Where some people think that it's imperative that you take a very specific stance.

49:49 And you can't have the other stance. Like, those moments on social media, those trouble a lot of people. Because they don't know why certain things get censored or certain things get promoted. Pause it, pause it real quick. So let's pick up guys right at that last point he makes. As if Rogan doesn't know what's going on, as if Zuckerberg doesn't know what's going on, they both know what's going on. The FBI, working on behalf of the Democrat Party, told Big Tech to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story. And Joe Rogan is up there acting like that's not the case, and they just got it wrong, and Big Tech just got duped, and we don't know what's going on, but we're against censorship, but we're okay with political censorship for the Democrat Party to rig elections for Joe Biden.

50:42 It was such a mistake. Well, will you apologize? No, of course we won't apologize. We're Democrats. We did it on purpose So let's think about the implications here and and and again They're just having a casual conversation like no big deal But they're talking about how the FBI, the Democrat Party, and big tech all colluded to rig an election against the American people and engaged in direct First Amendment violations and free speech censorship. And they admit all of it and they just put their hands in the air and say, eh, you know, well, yeah, we tried our best. Oh, so you helped rig an election, what you tried not to do, but they're not going to issue an apology because they really don't care.

51:25 and Rogan will not hold Zuckerberg's feet to the fire. He has him on the mat and instead of pinning him, he's gonna offer him a hand up so that he can stand up and do it again. So let's finish this off as Zuckerberg admits, yep, we got duped. Into censoring information so that the Democrats could cheat to win the election even though he knew that was the cause the entire time Any time is like a really controversial issue where some people think that it's imperative that you take a very specific stance and You can't have the other stance like that those moments Real quick let's just be clear here. There's only one side of the aisle calling for censorship, and that's liberals Democrats progressives the left

CHAPTER 10 / 43 Discussion

Meta Oversight Board, Ministry of Truth Allegations

Mark Zuckerberg discusses the creation of an independent oversight board at Meta to handle difficult content decisions and avoid being a "Ministry of Truth." The host dismisses these innovations as "bull-crap," asserting that the company's decisions consistently favor Democrats and that the only "right way" to handle speech is to stop censoring entirely.

mark zuckerberg· meta· oversight board· free expression· censorship

52:13 Okay, that's the only people calling for censorship here. So there's no controversial both sides. No, no, it's liberals and Democrats censoring information they don't want you to see. That's all it is. Let's stop acting like this is a two-way street. It's not and Rogan knows that. Continue a lot of people because they don't know Why certain things get censored, you know, he's get promoted. You know exactly why to protect Democrats. Yeah, I agree Yeah And it's like to be in your spot and I was one of the things that I really wanted to talk to you about is this cuz like to be in your spot must be insanely difficult here we go to have take your pants off ready make you're gonna have a giant chunk of people that are upset at you and

52:59 And there might be a right way to handle it, but I don't know what the fuck right way is. Well, I think the right way- Oh, really? You don't know the right way? Is to establish principles for governance that try to be balanced and not have- Now, now, pause it right here, because really it just gets- this is where it just gets so ridiculous and pathetic, and where Rogan truly cucks. It's honestly embarrassing. Honestly. This is just embarrassing at this point. These are two of the most influential, powerful men in America and they're sitting up there playing patty cake and having a little tea party jerking each other off while they're talking about how the Democrat Party, the FBI and Big Tech helped rig an election in this country and censor free speech against the First Amendment in this country.

53:47 And they're just, oh, nonchalant, let's have a tea party here. Let's fondle each other a little bit. This is embarrassing. At this point, it just gets embarrassing that these are two major American men, influencers with wealth and fortune and fame. And this is the most, this is what our men do. This is the pathetic conversations American men and leaders have to the public. It's embarrassing. Continue. Because I think that it's hard for people to to accept that like some team at Metta or that I personally am making all these decisions. And I think people should be skeptical about any, there's so much concentration around that. So that's why a lot of the innovation that I've tried to push for in governance is around things like establishing this oversight board. Yeah, he loves government. So that way you have people who are luminaries around expression from all over the world, but also in the US. He's just bull-crapping now. I mean, folks like Michael McConnell, who's, I mean, he's a Stanford professor, he's like,

54:48 Just he was afraid which Was a which Republican president appointed him, but I mean he was I think gonna be considered for the Supreme Court at some point He's a very Very prominent and and kind of celebrated free expression advocate caught censoring the thing out rigging elections flopping around like a fish out of water right governance around that are independent of us, that basically get the final say on a bunch of these decisions. And that's a step in the right direction. I mean, in the Hunter Biden case that you talked about before, I don't want our company to decide what's misinformation and what's not. What other cases are there? So we work with third parties and basically let different organizations do that. Oh, I'll pause it real quick. So this is where it gets really embarrassing. Well, we don't want to decide what's misinformation and disinformation, but when we do, it's always in support of the Democrats. Isn't that convenient? Continue.

55:44 then you have the question of are those organizations biased or not and that's a very difficult question but at least we're not the ones who are basically sitting here deciding, we're not the ministry of truth for the world that's deciding whether everything is true or not. I'd say this is not a solved problem, controversies aren't going away, I think that there's, it is interesting that the US, is actually more polarized than most other countries. So I think sitting in the US, it's easy to extrapolate and say, hey, it probably feels this way around the whole world. And from the social science research that I've seen, that's not actually the case. Now he's flopped so far, he's off the map. There's a bunch of countries where social media is just as prominent, but polarization has declined slightly. So there's something kind of different happening in the US. Pin him Joe, come on, pin him.

56:40 But for better or worse, I mean, it does seem like the next several years do seem like they're set up to be quite polarized. So I tend to agree with you. There are going to be a bunch of different decisions like this that come up. Because of the scale of what we do, almost every major world event has some angle that's like the Facebook or Instagram or WhatsApp angle about how the services are used in it. So yeah, I think just establishing as much as possible independent governance Governance. And guys, if you could go back to the part where Rogan is like, what do you do? I don't know what you do. And I want to try to play that one more time if we can before the break, if you guys can find that. The part where he says, yeah, I don't know what you do. Because that's the true cuck moment. Now, I want to be clear about something here.

57:24 I don't really know Joe Rogan, he's come around here, I've met him a couple times. I don't really care about celebrities or fame or fortune or anything. So I don't like flock when celebrities come around here. But you know, obviously I've met Joe. I don't really know Joe. I'm sure he's a fine guy to hang out with. And I don't really care, this isn't an agenda to attack Joe Rogan or try to make a name for myself, but because I gotta tell you, when I was watching that last night, I was embarrassed for Joe. I was truly embarrassed for Joe Rogan. that, you know, here's a strong man, an epic man, one of the most influential, powerful men in the country, one of the most listened to men in the country. And I felt bad yesterday because I gave him a hard time in my first response saying, geez, Joe, you cucked hard for Zuckerberg. And I felt bad and I said, you know what, I haven't seen the full thing, let me go double check it. And it turned out my initial response was right, and it's true. So for an American,

58:21 that idolizes strong men in leadership roles and successful men and influential men like Joe Rogan, that hurt my soul. That was like a gut punch to the American man to watch Joe Rogan up there cucking for Mark Zuckerberg. And that's what it was. He had Mark Zuckerberg dead to rights and quite frankly, potentially the biggest news story of the century. that big tech is being influenced by the Democrat Party and the FBI to censor information that hurts them during election years. And Rogan let Zuckerberg get off the hook and even said, yeah, I don't know what you do. And so here's the most embarrassing part to me where Rogan says, I don't know what you do.

59:14 And it's like to be in your spot and I was one of the things that I really wanted to talk to you about is this because like to be in your spot must be insanely difficult to have No matter what decision you make you're gonna have a giant chunk of people that are upset at you And there might be a right way to handle it, but I don't know. Well, I think the oh What I don't know how to handle it. I don't know what it. Oh, really you don't Joe you're on the air every day and You do UFC fights, you do podcasts, you do Fear Factor, you do everything. But you don't know the right way? Really, Joe? You ever heard of free speech, Joe? You ever heard of the First Amendment, Joe? Here's an idea. How about Facebook and Twitter and YouTube stop censoring at the behest of the FBI and the Democrat Party? How about they stop the one-way street of censorship only against conservatives, Christians, and Republicans? Joe says, I don't know what to do. How about you let people speak?

1:00:08 We already figured this out a long time ago. That's why it's the First Amendment. You let people speak. But you know who doesn't like letting people speak? Criminals. That too. Liars, cheats, thieves, and criminals. And it's never been more obvious that that's what the Democrats, the FBI, and big tech are. Alright, I had a bunch of news to cover on my desk, but I think I'm gonna postpone it for now, because I want to take your phone calls in response. Because nobody's making a big deal on this. And that's because Rogan didn't make a big deal of it. So Zuckerberg goes on the Rogan podcast, admits the FBI helped rig an election, big tech helped rig an election for the Democrats, just barely makes headway, and Joe Rogan says, oh, I don't know what you do. He got duped, oh well. And again, let me be clear, I like Joe Rogan. I have no ill will towards Joe Rogan. I'm sure he's a great guy. I've never had a negative experience when he comes around here. So this isn't like some vendetta. I like Joe, I think he's a good guy. But see,

CHAPTER 11 / 43 Discussion

Student Loan Forgiveness, College Tuition Scam

The Biden administration's student loan forgiveness plan is criticized as an illegal wealth transfer and a move to buy votes. Referencing Mike Cernovich, the host argues that colleges should be prosecuted for fraud rather than taxpayers footing the bill, and predicts that the policy will only lead to higher tuition costs.

joe biden· student loans· cernovich· college tuition· wealth transfer

1:03:38 Because it's imperative that we understand this. So I'm gonna cover some of this news while the crew gets your calls and we'll take calls starting in the next segment. Because it's important that we understand something here. So let me just go down this list. Peter Ducey forced to ask White House same question six times about Biden student loan forgiveness. The White House has no answers, nobody has any answers. It's totally illegal, it's totally criminal, it's totally nonsensical, it's more theft of the American people, and they don't know the numbers, they don't know the legalities, they just do it because they want to buy votes, because they're communists. And this is the populist and common sense opinion in response to

1:04:16 the student debt transfer of wealth, student debt forgiveness from Cernovich. But this is how everyone feels about this, including friends of mine and family members of mine that still have student debt, that they agree that this is the truth here. From Cernovich on Twitter, colleges defrauded students. The answer is to prosecute and demand they pay restitution. That's how to make victims whole. Instead, the scammers keep the money and students looking for a vacation from the real world figure they should borrow money, bet on a future bailout. So, college tuition will raise by $10,000, $20,000 after this. And then there's going to be the moral dilemma of people who know that they can take out student loans or rather think they can take out student loans and never pay it back. This is a disaster of a policy, a disaster of a proposal. The Republicans should be doing everything to stop it right now for the sake of the country, but they're not because they suck too.

1:05:08 But that's the real scam here. College is the real scam. They should be the ones forced to pay these back with their hundreds of billions of dollars of endowments. In fact... I bet you, this is how the universe works, I bet if you added all the major universities endowments, I bet you it would be at least $300 billion. They could repay all of these loans back tomorrow, but instead, you the American that either never went to college or that did pay back your student loans, you have to pay for the commies and the crybaby bums loans that they don't want to pay back. But see this is just part of the same trend. Restaurants, pubs, cafes and shops are all small businesses are forced to close as energy bills bite. That's the new world order. That's the green new energy deal. You're priced out of the life experience. You're priced out of civilization. That's what the globalists are trying to do. It's like if you have a country club

CHAPTER 12 / 43 Discussion

European Energy Crisis, Globalist Climate Change Lies

Electricity prices in Europe have quadrupled due to globalist policies and the shutdown of traditional energy sources. The host argues that "man-made climate change" is a lie used to price citizens out of civilization and force them into serfdom, citing historical data showing the Earth has been warmer for most of the last 10,000 years.

europe· energy prices· globalism· climate change· holocene

1:06:01 that's reasonably priced, but you have 10 members that are billionaires, and the billionaires don't like anyone else being there. So they demand that the country club raise their entry rate to $100 million. And then they're the only ones that can afford it. So they pay the $100 million, and then they own the club. That's the analogy for the entire planet. The world elite are raising the price of everything to price you out of the life experience. It's happening in Europe and it's a major disaster. So what does Granholm say to Europe? Tough luck, good luck, you're all gonna go poor, you're all gonna go broke, you're all gonna starve, you're all gonna go freeze in the winter and die in the summer from heat. Here's a graph of the price, the electricity price in Europe. It's now quadruple what it's been for the last 20 years.

1:06:48 And that's because Biden gave Russia control of the pipelines and they've shut off the energy. Not to mention the shutdown of the farms, the shutdown of coal, the shutdown of gas. It's just crushing the world. Because the globalist elite have decided you can't exist. You don't get ease of access, you don't get cheap energy anymore. The leader of Huawei sent out an email that got leaked. Ren Zhengfei warned that there will be no bright spot in the world for three to five years. It will be a very painful historic period. The founder and CEO of the Chinese telecoms giant paints a bleak picture head for global growth and tells the staff to brace for survival. Yeah, he knows what the globalists are doing. He knows what these world elites are doing. And what is the excuse for all of this? What is the excuse for making the world go poor? What is the excuse for making the world go into serfdom? What is the excuse? Man-made climate change. Except that's a lie!

1:07:46 Peter Clack shares the graphs here. If there's any climate change, the world is actually getting colder, but even that's not a serious threat. The Earth has been warmer than the modern era for 83% of the past 10,000 years, meaning we're not in the hottest time period, not even close. On a larger scale, the interglacial period, known as the Holocene, is the only time of global warming in 100,000 years. These are facts from climate studies by scientists. We should fear cold. Well, we shouldn't fear cold, we shouldn't necessarily fear anything. when it comes to climate, except just to be smart when there's serious weather events. But see, this is what it's all about. So they lied about climate change to turn you into a slave, to price you out of the life experience, price you out of civilization, all being done by the global elites that view you as a bug, a cockroach that they can stomp out. When you stomp on a cockroach in your house, do you feel bad about that? No. That's how the globalists feel about you.

CHAPTER 13 / 43 Discussion

Emergency Preparedness, Elon Musk Population Collapse Warning

Listeners are encouraged to visit preparetoday.com for storable food as globalists target the food industry. The segment also covers Elon Musk's tweet regarding population collapse being a greater risk than global warming, though the host criticizes Musk for "cucking" by still acknowledging climate change as a risk.

preparetoday.com· elon musk· population collapse· birth rates· climate change

1:08:41 So knowing this, you should go to preparetoday.com, ladies and gentlemen, and get yourself emergency preparedness needs. Do you have storable food, emergency food? Because the globalists are trying to shut down the food industry entirely in case you haven't noticed. So go to infowarsstore.com or go to preparetoday.com, 10% off site wide on all storable foods and emergency preparedness goods at preparetoday.com. You know, I gotta tell ya, it's a real shame, it's a real embarrassment, and it's kinda surreal to be honest, cuz, I mean, folks, like, I don't even know how to say this, but it's like the men at InfoWars, as far as media is concerned, are the realest men in the world.

1:09:37 at least in America, because I just look at the Rogan Zuckerberg cuck fest and you're like, dang, these are supposed to be epic American men and leaders. They're weak, they're soft, just look at that puff piece. And then there's Elon Musk. And so I see Elon Musk just put this up on Twitter and he says, population collapse due to low birth rates is a much bigger risk to civilization than global warming. And I'm like, yeah, there's some manly hood. There's some leadership. But then, oh, Elon has to follow it up with a cuck tweet that says, but I do think global warming is a major risk. Like Elon, you just stood up and you were a thousand stories tall admitting that the collapse of civilization is due to depopulation, not climate change. And then you just chop yourself right back down to size by putting out the propaganda.

1:10:38 Why are men so pathetic? Why are these men as leaders such a joke? Step up and be a man! Quit cucking to the New World Order! Quit cucking to the propaganda because you want to be accepted and you want to fit in because you're scared of the censorship. Pathetic. Of course, I get it. You're scared of the censorship because you're worried about your money. and you're scared of the attacks and the lies that'll come against you, you're scared. So I get it. I get it. We go to the phone lines now, responding to the Zuckerberg, Rogan, Kuckfest. Oh, Facebook helped rig an election, so what? They didn't know, they thought it was good. Let's start with Rhonda in Texas. Rhonda, you're on the Alex Jones Show, go ahead.

CHAPTER 14 / 43 Discussion

Listener Call, Rogan and Zuckerberg in Texas

A caller named Rhonda expresses disgust with Joe Rogan for his interview with Mark Zuckerberg, calling it a "slap in the face" to Alex Jones. The host and caller discuss how influential men moving from California to Texas may bring destructive ideologies with them and fail to stand up against censorship.

joe rogan· mark zuckerberg· texas· california· censorship

1:11:35 Hello, I just couldn't believe when I woke up this morning and heard Joe Rogan and Zuckerberg on my TV at 8 o'clock in the morning Harrison. I'm floored. What a slap in Alex's face. Joe Rogan, I mean, and I should have seen Joe Rogan having, you know, pinned to the wall. Oh my god, it's just, you're right. Weak men, very weak, and I'm very disgusted. And why do they move to Texas? And, ugh. Well, because, you know, they helped destroy California, and they know California is now a failed state, so they're probably going to come here and help destroy Texas too. Exactly, exactly. Well, they're doing a good job in Austin, it sounds like. I mean, you know, I'm in Dallas.

1:12:25 I'm just, I can't, there's just not enough words to, I'm so disgusted with Rogan. And it's weak. It's weak. And I feel for y'all, y'all, I mean, Rogan's supposed to be his friend and that's not, that's not standing up at all. Well, and look, he doesn't have to make the issue about censorship of Alex Jones or Infowars. I understand that. But the fact that he is not even standing up for the censorship and what is political censorship and he just says, oh, you know, I mean, basically they're saying it's an honest mistake. That's a lie. Here's my thing as somebody that consumes as much media probably as anyone else on the planet. I mean, I don't know how you could consume more media than me. I don't like it when

1:13:11 I get slapped in the face by the person that I'm listening to. It's an immediate turn off. That's why I don't listen to Rogan Experience. Hey, it's the top podcast in the world. I understand why. I know why Rogan plays both sides. I know why he's so successful. Good for him as a businessman. But for me, I don't like the host slapping me in the face. But Rogan's audience will probably not go anywhere even though he just slapped them all in the face with that interview. Exactly. Exactly. I mean, I'm disgusted with him and I know that that Alex is probably, I mean, human because Well, I'm not gonna speak for Alex and I don't have the relationship with Joe Alex does and it's not really about Alex I mean that's kind of like the side set of the censorship issue But but yeah, I mean you could certainly say well look you falsely censored this story Maybe you falsely censored Alex Jones and Infowars, but you don't dare say that. Exactly, so it sets us back so far from the progress that we've made I've watched y'all for three years every single day all day long and it

CHAPTER 15 / 43 Discussion

Johnson & Johnson Vaccine, Vaccine Lawsuits Discussion

A caller asks about the safety of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. The host notes that while it was the first pulled from shelves, it is technically closer to a traditional vaccine than the mRNA versions from Pfizer and Moderna, though he maintains that all were rushed and ineffective.

johnson & johnson· vaccine· mrna· pfizer· moderna

1:14:11 Well, God bless you, Rhonda. God bless you for that. But see, your point is taken here in that it started with Alex Jones. Oh, innocent enough. Just one guy, one bombastic guy on the air that's lied about and everything. So, OK. Oh, we're just taking Alex Jones. It's just Alex Jones. Really? Four years after that. Internet censorship is used to rig elections and the biggest names in big tech admit it and the biggest name in podcasting, Joe Rogan, lets them get away with it. Let's go to Travis in Tennessee. Travis, you're on the Alex Jones Show. Go ahead. Hey Owen. Howdy. So I didn't actually catch the whole Zuckerberg thing with Joe Rogan but did he actually like give him any kind of criticism or ask him like any critical questions at all or did he just let him spout his crap or what?

1:15:03 So we played the meat and potatoes of the portion of Zuckerberg admitting the internet censorship. The rest is kind of just back and forth fluffiness. Right. But no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Rogan did not pin Zuckerberg. He did not hold his feet to the fire. He crumbled up like a paper airplane ball. That's insane. Quickly, I know that the topic was supposed to be Zuckerberg, but I've been trying to call you for a little while to ask you what you know about the Johnson & Johnson vaccine because, you know, over a year ago I kind of let them shoot me up with it and I shouldn't have and all I hear is the mRNA. Was that the two-shot? No, no. That was the one and done? The deactivated virus one?

1:15:47 Yeah, so I think I'm not really prepared for this. I'm going to answer your question real quick, but move on because I want to stick on topic. The original Johnson and Johnson vaccine was the first one actually pulled from the shelves when they first released it. But it's the closest thing to an actual vaccine. But it was still rushed. It still doesn't work. But I think you're probably better off with the Johnson and Johnson than the Pfizer or the Moderna. But I I actually think there's now lawsuits going back and forth between these companies now. I don't know if you guys can search that, but I think either Moderna or Pfizer or somebody's suing the other ones. But it was Johnson & Johnson that actually, I believe it was Johnson & Johnson that the CEOs actually ended up campaigning with Donald Trump. So that was an odd one. All right, let's go to Marco in California. Marco, you're on the air. Go ahead. How's it going, Owen? Howdy.

CHAPTER 16 / 43 Discussion

Joe Rogan Gatekeeper Allegations, Infighting Refusal

A caller brings up past conflicts between Owen Benjamin and Joe Rogan, labeling Rogan a "gatekeeper." Owen Shroyer refuses to engage in personal attacks or "infighting," stating his focus is strictly on the news story of Zuckerberg admitting to election meddling on Rogan's platform.

joe rogan· owen benjamin· gatekeeper· infighting· censorship

1:16:38 Pretty good. I like to just make a plug for the X2. If you don't get anything else, get the X2. It's a great price point. And anytime you feel a sniffle or a cough or been around people that might have COVID, just take a couple of drops and you'll be fine. There you go. Right on. So I wanted to talk about Rogan. He's definitely a gatekeeper. And I really just thought it was funny how a couple of years ago, Owen Benjamin was calling him out. And like Owen was saying that He was like a dumpster pumping Tony, uh, Tony Hinchcliffe behind the comedy store and he always called him dump, dumpster pump. So he's definitely a sodomite. If you look at his head screens from the, uh, his head shots from his acting career, um, like when he had hair, he looks like totally fruity. And, um, when he was having that beef with Alex, he was like, uh, hurry to hurry to make amends because, um, a lot of Alex's friends, uh, fans are going on his comments and saying, um,

1:17:34 about the Tony, the Jack Dorsey Bitcoin pumping dump. And if you just flood his comments with something like that, he is forced to make a comment about it. Well look, I don't, I don't, I don't, I don't, let me explain something. I don't do infighting. So I'm not, I'm not infighting with Joe Rogan. This is a major story that he had on his podcast that in my opinion as a host, he blew the story. But As far as Benjamin and Rogan or any of this other stuff, I don't really do the infighting stuff. I don't really, I'm not gonna talk any personal accusations about Joe Rogan. I don't really know or care about it, quite frankly. So I'm just sitting here commenting on Zuckerberg admitting that he helped the Democrats with the FBI rig the election for Joe Biden. That's the story.

CHAPTER 17 / 43 Discussion

White House Press Control, Joe Biden Control Issues

The segment mocks the "White House Karens" and staff who frequently shut down press questions and "wrangle" Joe Biden. The host suggests that Biden's own admissions indicate he is not truly in control of the executive branch.

joe biden· white house press· karine jean-pierre· easter bunny· control

1:18:26 Whatever else is going on with Rogan or other people. That's that's not my cup of tea. I don't do infighting I don't do I don't do rumor mill crap like that, so I'm just I'm not gonna comment on that I'm just gonna stick to the story at hand I I'm not allowed to do that. Go ahead, you tell him. I think we're going to go ahead and have the rest of the conversation closed for us. Thank you all so much. Step up and say press please get out. We're gonna do the rest behind closed doors remember all those different clips of the White House Karen's that sometimes they dress up in Easter Bunny outfits to wrangle Joe Biden up at the at the Easter Egg Roll some Times there's five of them hanging out in the press room and then as soon as Joe Biden needs to be shut down They start screaming all right time to leave time to leave time to leave and round them up like a bunch of psychos the White House Karen's who's really running the White House Joe Biden admits today He's not in control

CHAPTER 18 / 43 Discussion

Spotify Influence, InfoWars Financial Transparency

A caller suggests that Joe Rogan has become a "willing gatekeeper" to protect his mainstream credibility. Shroyer points out that Rogan's contract with Spotify likely influences his content, whereas InfoWars remains independent despite being targeted in bankruptcy court and lied about by the media regarding their finances.

joe rogan· spotify· infowars· bankruptcy· big pharma

1:19:45 We go back to the phone lines. We're taking your calls, responding to the Rogan Zuckerberg admission that they rig elections for Democrats. Stunning stuff. Rogan lets him get away with it. Let's go to Tyler in Ohio. Tyler, you're on the Alex Jones Show. Go ahead. Hey Owen, great job today. You're hitting it out of the park, man. I just wanted to say I've never listened to Joe Rogan over the years. I started just over the last month or two starting to listen to his podcast because Alex Jones speaks so highly of him. And I've noticed, I mean this is an ongoing theme, I would call him a willing

1:20:23 gatekeeper of information anytime a conversation will go to a subject out of the box or to something that will you know compromise the mainstream he only goes too far he will he won't go too far to the left or right and I feel he's a gatekeeper this this interview today does not surprise me at all the way he handled it he's I mean like you said he's a great businessman but not not a truth man and I And I would say InfoWars should try to start separating themselves from Rogan as much as possible because this is just step one in him compromising his credibility for the truth movement. Well, Rogan knows his audience better than me, but I would never do something like that to my audience. And I'd be surprised if a lot of his audience members aren't really upset at the way he handled that interview.

1:21:17 I don't know how much crossover there is between Alex Jones' audience and Chris' audience. I would say a large. I would say pretty big. Yeah, well, a good portion of his audience was embarrassed for him, like you said today. Ridiculous interview, but I'm not surprised by like I said that what I see is more of the same from him But let's keep one thing in mind here Joe Rogan has big sponsors and Joe Rogan works at a big tech company called Spotify So that might have something to do with it. I don't know but might be worth pointing out not here We are totally independent total free speech, and that's why we have to get shut down, and it's so funny They it's just the lies they tell about us folks. I mean look

1:22:03 Yeah, Alex Jones probably could have made hundreds of millions of dollars over the years. I probably could demand about a lot more money than I make here. We're not in it for money. Like, it's just, the crew works every day, 12 hours a day, they deserve more pay, hazard pay, overtime pay, they don't complain. But then they make it like, oh, look at Infowars, these greedy, grubby people with all this money. It's like, okay, fine. I mean, they have all my bank account records. They have all Alex's bank account records. We're in bankruptcy court and they still come out and lie and say we've got hundreds of millions of dollars that we don't have. It's just, it's obnoxious. Thanks, Tyler. Let's go to Heath in Georgia. Heath, you're on the Alex Jones Show. Go ahead.

CHAPTER 19 / 43 Discussion

Masculinity in Media, Supporting Donald Trump

The host and a caller discuss the lack of "masculine leadership" in mainstream media, specifically citing Rogan's behavior during the Zuckerberg interview. They emphasize the importance of supporting Donald Trump against globalist attempts to separate him from his base, even if one doesn't want him to run for president again.

joe rogan· masculinity· donald trump· elijah schaefer· truth movement

1:22:47 Hey Owen, you know I just want to agree with the previous caller and say that at the end of the day I'm not surprised with the Joe Rogan interview but like I'm sure you are, I was just disappointed. No, I'm telling you when I was watching Rogan crumble like that in front of Zuckerberg it hurt me as a man. I'm like Rogan is supposed to be a masculine man, a leader. And then for him to just fold like that, like a cheap tent in front of Zuckerberg, like a man-child, it's pathetic. It hurt. I was like, dang, Joe, like, dang, like, be a man. Well, and that's why, you know, I think Harrison said on the show yesterday that we need more, you know, coverage for people like you or Elijah Schaefer, just conservative celebrities, you know what I mean? And it won't

1:23:37 just cuck out constantly that don't, aren't ingratiated with these corporations and you know, just everything. Well, you know, it's funny you say that because, you know, Elijah and a lot of these guys that are my age that are kind of up and coming in media right now, we're all good friends and then we, let me just say we understand the dynamics ahead of us with the censorship and everything else. And so this is not something we're unaware of. But, well I do appreciate you for saying that we need to continue to have Trump's back right now. You know, even though, I mean, they're trying to turn his followers against us. Yeah, and it's not just about supporting Trump, it's about supporting the truth. Doesn't mean we have to support him to run for president again, but we have to understand that the agenda at foot is to get Trump's loyalists to stop supporting him so they can use that as an example in the future.

1:24:32 Well, I've been an info warrior for over 10 years now and Owen you have supercharged the tip of the spear for this generation and I love you and Alex and I pray the Holy Spirit over all you guys at InfoWars right now and You know just keep fighting the good fight. What a time to be alive. Well, I appreciate that and Well, I'd like to expand on that but we got callers waiting so maybe but let me just tell you the caller right there hit on something that is probably worthy of a conversation about the future of media, the future of Infowars, the future of Alex Jones, Owen Schroer, and some other people that are truth tellers out there that get censored and kneecapped before they can make it. But I've got callers on the line, so I'll have to put that off towards another day, but the caller's onto something there. Let's go to Brad in Texas. Brad, you're on The Alex Jones Show. Go ahead. God bless you, brother. Thanks for calling.

CHAPTER 20 / 43 Discussion

Joe Rogan Sellout Evidence, 9/11 and COVID Response

A caller lists three reasons why Joe Rogan is a "sellout," including his skepticism of Alex Jones' 9/11 warnings and his enforcement of COVID antibody tests for guests. Shroyer offers a partial defense of Rogan's COVID stance but agrees that the Zuckerberg interview was a significant failure in holding power accountable.

joe rogan· 9/11· covid-19· antibody tests· mark zuckerberg

1:25:28 Absolutely. You know, instead of plugging a product, Owen, I'd like to plug you. I had a chance to meet you at the Reawaken tour here in Frisco in the Dallas area. And quite frankly, brother, if more people were as awake as you are in their early 30s, we would have a different country on our hands. And I can prove with your permission absolutely that Joe Rogan is a sellout in three simple topics. All right, well, let's see it. One, when Alex called Joe Rogan on 9-11 after he had told him about the upcoming attack, Joe Rogan said, I know, I don't think that, you know, the government would do anything like that. Day one, Joe Rogan sold us out. Step two, when all the info warriors knew this, you know, upcoming facts, it was a hoax and everything else, Joe Rogan was still pimping the antibody test and

1:26:20 and made all of his guests take antibody tests. That is true. Now, now, I... All right, go ahead. Yeah, you're gone. No, even a year or six months ago. Go ahead, sir. No, no, I want you to finish before I respond. I'm sorry. And then the third reason we know he's a sellout, because if he had the testicular fortitude that you or I would have during that interview, how about why did you give half a billion dollars, Zucker Kuck, to try to sell out an election? Yeah. How about why are you working with the Chinese party? Or what stories did you censor You know, in favor of Republicans. Did you censor any of those stories? So let me just respond. Let me just respond, Brad, and thank you for the call. And your points are taken here. And let me just kind of play devil's advocate in response to that.

1:27:10 I mean, I think the call from Joe Rogan to Alex Jones after 9-11, I would actually say is more of a good thing in the overall thing for Joe Rogan, because he was at least willing to question the narrative and was shocked at the potential that the government would do that, but he was at least willing to have a conversation. And then as far as Rogan with the response to COVID, In perspective, he actually had one of the better responses, but that's not saying much, considering how far left and medical tyrant the response was from the media. But he was for ivermectin, he didn't really promote the vaccines, he basically said, hey, be healthy and you're going to be fine.

1:27:48 I mean, they did make all the guests of his show take an antibody test. I don't know if that was Joe Rogan or Spotify doing that, but that did happen. He didn't stick up for those people. Like, Dan Bongino stuck up for people that didn't want to take a test or take a vaccine at Cumulus Radio. And then, yes, with the Zuckerberg interview, obviously that's the topic here of the day, and you're spot on about that. He let Zuckerberg get away with it. I mean, he really crumbled, and I was stunned. I was Was stunned like it hurt like it hurt me that Joe Rogan let Zuckerberg get off the hook like that So it's really sad. Let's go to PT in Michigan. I'm sorry I've got 30 seconds left here. If you can get it in before the break PT go ahead

CHAPTER 21 / 43 Discussion

Courage in Media, Confronting Mark Zuckerberg

Callers continue to criticize Joe Rogan's lack of "deep thought" and courage compared to the team at InfoWars. Shroyer reiterates that Rogan had a massive story in his hands regarding election rigging and "blew it" for the American people by being too soft on Zuckerberg.

joe rogan· mark zuckerberg· courage· truth· infowars

1:28:28 Listen, I'd like to stay over and I will say this that anytime Alex mentions his name I cringe. There is no deep thought coming out of this UFC battered fighters head. I can't I don't know what his appeal is. You guys blow him away in terms of courage and listen he's on YouTube apologizing for using the n-word and for talking about COVID-19 in you know in some negative way I mean in some positive way. Well let me just that's that's fine. Look, I'm not trying to be in a competition with Rogan here. This isn't some sort of a measuring stick with Rogan. I'm covering a big story that came out on his show. And I mean, look at how Joe Rogan responds to when somebody gets knocked out in a fight. It's like a living meme, Joe Rogan's response. But here, Zuckerberg admits how elections are rigged and Rogan doesn't even bat an eye. All right, we're taking a couple more phone calls ahead of our guest.

1:29:23 Dr. Jason Dean joining us in five minutes, but let's squeeze in a couple more phone calls here Let's go to Tito in California Tito you're on the Alex Jones show go ahead Hey, hey, how you doing? My name is Tito. So I just want to say thank you for calling him out because you want to get to the truth of things. And I was a fan of Joe Rogan. I've listened to him for a while, especially because Alex talked about him. But after this, it's just not right. I mean, he needs to confront Mark Zuckerberg, and he didn't. And it's just nonsense. I'm tired of all these type of guys that want to do truth, but they really don't. They're back down.

CHAPTER 22 / 43 Discussion

V for Vendetta Analogy, Rogan's Neutrality Strategy

Shroyer uses a "V for Vendetta" analogy to describe Alex Jones' total commitment to fighting the New World Order. He debates with a caller whether Rogan's "neutral" approach was a masterful way to get Zuckerberg to admit to FBI collusion or if it simply validated liberal censorship ideologies.

v for vendetta· joe rogan· mark zuckerberg· neutrality· election rigging

1:30:00 But I appreciate all you doing, InfoWars. I appreciate all you guys. And God bless all you guys. Thank you, Tito. And let me just explain something quickly if I can here, because... Boy, it'll take too long, but let's just say it's the V for Vendetta analogy and Alex kind of lives it. Where it's like Alex has already just decided he's dead and every ounce of him is going to be committed towards fighting evil in the New World Order at any cost. But it's kind of a lesser analogy is that that's the same story on the internet. It's like I've been completely banned, so I'm already dead as far as internet censorship is concerned, so I have nothing to lose.

1:30:41 So it's not about I'm in a competition with Joe Rogan, it's not like I'm going after Joe Rogan as a person. This is a huge story, Joe Rogan had the story, and he blew it for the American people. Let's go to Josh in South Carolina. Josh, you're on the Alex Jones Show, go ahead. Hey Owen, yeah it was a gut punch for me too and I agree with everything you say but after I got to thinking about it, the only way he was going to get Zuckerberg to incriminate himself, it's kind of like a good solicitor man. Getting you to feel comfortable and just like giving him a hand up off the mat, you know, and trying to defend himself, he just incriminates himself more.

1:31:21 And at that time, you know, he even brought up COVID and everything else. I mean, it's like he was just opening the door and giving people some ammo, man, admitting to his crimes. You know, now everybody can use that admission. and go after him. Zuckerberg along in the fluff piece, but your point is definitely taken. Him having Zuckerberg on and getting him to admit that by playing a neutral, milk-toast, lukewarm host is probably what allowed that to happen. So your point is taken. It's a fair point, Josh. Let's go to John in Nevada. John, you're on the Alex Jones Show. Go ahead.

1:32:20 Hi Owen, how are you? I'm good, thanks for calling. So just a quick one, I want to build on what the prior caller just said actually. Would you agree that Rogan caters to a more politically diverse audience than InfoWars? Yeah, I'd say Joe tries to remain as neutral as possible. Yeah, I mean, and so here are my thoughts. First of all, I love you guys, but you know, I'm going to just say that what he did was somewhat masterful because he kept both sides guard down. And again, building on what the prior caller said, he comes across completely neutral. He has no agenda. And he got three admissions, right? The feds that he also admitted that Twitter completely censored.

1:33:14 And then he admitted that Facebook actively suppressed, and it was material. I mean, and to me, he got through to more people on both sides of the aisle. with the way he did it than had he come across as if he had an agenda. Well that I would disagree with you on. I don't think he got through to any liberals. I think if anything he further cemented the liberal ideology that censorship is good and that Zuckerberg did the right thing. But I'm willing to compromise the fact that because of Rogan's neutrality, he was able to get Zuckerberg to do the interview and admit those things. I am willing to admit that. But I don't think Rogan came into that consciously like, oh, I'm going to be the nice guy here to get him to admit that stuff. I think that just happened through osmosis. But that's a fair point.

CHAPTER 23 / 43 Discussion

Wearable Tech Surveillance, World Economic Forum Mental Health Toolkit

Dr. Jason Dean warns that smartwatches, Fitbits, and Oura rings are tools for the World Economic Forum's "Global Governance Toolkit for Digital Mental Health." He claims these devices monitor sleep and voices to perform "computational psychiatry," eventually leading to the forced delivery of psychotropic drugs to citizens.

world economic forum· fitbit· apple watch· mental health· surveillance

1:35:45 Are you wearing an iWatch? Are you wearing a smartwatch? Are you wearing a Fitbit or one of these other tools on your body to track your fitness? Well, guess what? Somebody else has access and can track that as well. So Dr. Dean joins us to break this down. If somebody out there right now listening is wearing a smartwatch, iWatch, Fitbit, what is something or what are the things they need to know that concern you, Dr. Dean? Yeah, Owen, thanks for having me on. I appreciate it. So I work with people who are on psychotropic drugs all the time and try to help them naturally to get off those things. And what happened was there was a new label that came out after they started injecting everybody with the bioweapon.

1:36:29 which was called New Onset Psychosis. So I realized people are wearing these eyewatches everywhere, the Fitbits everywhere, the Oura ring, you name it. And so I actually went on, this isn't even a conspiracy. This is the World Economic Forum themselves. They put out a report called Global Governance Toolkit for Digital Mental Health and how they're gonna disrupt the mental health world with technology. And so the Calm.com app, which actually connects to these as well, They're part of the World Economic Forum. Michael Acton Smith, who actually is like the CEO founder of Calm.com, actually works with the World Economic Forum. So does Fitbit.

1:37:09 So does the Oura Ring, the iWatch with the health app. And they're actually monitoring, but they're not only monitoring, they're listening to people's voices. And long-term what they're gonna do, they actually show it in the report, is they're gonna start doing computational psychiatry. They're gonna do nanotechnology that attaches to your body along with these devices. And ultimately, the real long-term goal on this, Owen, is they're gonna get psych drugs to more people. They want them in this idea of, hey, something's wrong with you. You can't have emotions. You can't be sad. And we have all these kids on iPads, phones, et cetera. They're actually delivering surveys to them where they pick out if they're sad or they're upset, if their friend is mean to them. This also ties to places like Amazon, Walmart, who are actually building the infrastructure behind the scenes right now

1:38:07 where they're gonna start delivering medications and drugs to people's front door. This is the way in with socialism. As Lenin said, you can get socialism in a country by doing it through healthcare. This has all been tied together, Owen, and people aren't awake to this. They don't even know what's happening because everyone's wearing it. I'm sure you've seen people wearing it. Well, yeah, it's obviously a very popular thing. It never really was something I fancied because I feel like I don't need technology to track my health, but some people feel they need that. I think that's kind of the break here is that you don't need tech to monitor your health, but I can understand the advantages.

1:38:45 You know is this something that is not fully disclosed? I mean we can understand the World Economic Forum having some sort of agenda when it comes to this you know digital technology on your person at all time. But when you're buying the Fitbit or buying the iWatch, I mean you know you click the terms and service agreements you never read them. Do they tell you they're sharing this information with third parties whoever they want? So in the in the details of the contract, which everyone's doing at this point, because I don't know if everybody knows, but at this point with your iPhone, because we're all using technology and we're using it now. on the iPhone, you can no longer delete an app on your iPhone. Back in the day, you used to be able to hit an X on it, it went away, you could go back, get it from the app store again and install it. Now you can't, it actually sits in the back of the iPhone. So when you're agreeing to the terms of service, you're agreeing that it stays on there. When your phone is turned off, there's scientific evidence, there's data behind the scenes with CIA where it openly listens to you even with the phone off. So when you get these apps,

1:39:48 I actually downloaded the Calm.com app months ago because I wanted to see what it looked like. You can't uninstall it. It's on there. So these people with Fitbit, they actually just did a study. You can literally Google this. You can go to Big Tech themselves. You can Google Fitbit and World Economic Forum. They actually did a study where they took six billion nights of sleep. of Americans. Now, Americans, you didn't know they were taking your sleep. In the World Economic Forum working with the Fitbit company, they took the data from your sleep and they did an entire study and it's actually up online on the World Economic Forum website right now. So you're right, Owen. People are agreeing to all this stuff. It's in the terms of service. None of us are reading it because obviously it's legalese and

CHAPTER 24 / 43 Discussion

Smart Device Privacy Invasions, New Onset Psychosis

Dr. Dean discusses how smart devices monitor intimate activities and harvest data for globalist databases. He mentions "New Onset Psychosis" as a label used for those reacting to "bioweapons" and warns that the doctor-patient relationship is being replaced by automated management from the New World Order.

amazon alexa· glucose monitoring· barack obama· new onset psychosis· bioweapons

1:40:32 and we just want our technology. So people are being totally blindsided by this and they don't even know what's coming. They don't know that their kids' voices are being listened to. I mean, this goes down to the actual DNA. Abbott Labs. has a product called Libra, which is actually a glucose monitoring system for diabetics. And one of the people working on this was Barack Obama's half-sister, Maya. This is total World Economic Forum. This is total deep state. This is literally total world order, Owen. So I'm just, I'm thinking about all the potentials here because it was mainstream news like two or three years ago that your Amazon Alexa or whatever Apple products you might have in your house would know if you're having sex. And it was I guess the sounds it was making or your heart rate or whatever and it came out mainstream news like oh your smart devices are monitoring when you have sex.

1:41:28 And so it's all this invasion of privacy that you really don't sign on to or understand what's going on. And now you have these communist groups like the World Economic Forum just harvesting that data for whatever reason they want, I guess. But how penetrating is it? Because I learned something the other day. where I got a new phone recently but I was still transferring some of the contacts over. But so my old phone, not connected to the internet, no SIM card, totally shut down, but it was still able to receive emergency alerts and it just made me realize your phone is never off, your phone is actually never disconnected from the internet, it's always on and it's always connected to the internet unless you basically smash it into bits.

1:42:16 100% well, not only their phone, but now the Fitbit is never going to be off. The or ring is never going to be off. The I watch is never going to be off and I don't know why everyone now needs to have their text sent directly to their wrist. I don't know why everyone needs the phone. The phone call going directly to their wrist. We've literally let them into our world and this is my actual real concern. So we have, there's been studies that show upwards of 200 million Americans, now not all of them have been prescribed, but up to 200 million Americans potentially on psychotropic drugs. That includes children.

1:42:53 So when they talk about in this report computational psychiatry, what they actually mean is you're going to be on Facebook, you're going to be on all these big tech apps and they're going to say, hey, take a survey about your mood, take a survey or they're going to just listen to your voice and they're going to pick up your mood. You're going to get a little survey where you click. Oh, well, I feel sad today. Your kids. are going to be getting that. Because I mean, kids are on the phone, they're on their iPad because mom and dad let that tech babysit them now. So they're going to be clicking on those things. And no longer does anybody need to actually go to a person like a good physician. There's good ones out there, there's bad ones out there. You don't even have to go anymore. Now you can literally just allow World Economic Forum, you can allow the New World Order to control you and your children

1:43:42 And literally they will give you a diagnosis like new onset psychosis which they actually used for people who had hallucinations after the COVID bioweapon. They will now allow you to label and diagnose yourself and so drugs can be shipped directly to you. They've literally destroyed the actual doctor-patient relationship. And now you can just be managed by the World Economic Forum and all your devices, and they'll know exactly what to do. And this is happening all over of healthcare. I mean, Obama put in Obamacare. This allowed for all of this stuff to be injected into society, and we've allowed it in. Just like you said with Alexa, Google, everything else, they're listening to everything we do. Well, and I'm curious, we're about to go to break, but you can comment on this on the other side of the break.

1:44:31 You know people think that oh if I don't have this Fitbit or this iWatch and this smart technology there's no way to track my health but that's not true and so I want to talk about that and because I used to get you know blood tests are just smart you know get your blood test to make sure you're healthy and I had in a couple years And we had this thing at the office where it's like you step on the scale, it tells you your body mass index and all this stuff. And it was cool, but it was like, where is that information going? Who has that now? Dr. Jason Dean with us, BraveTV.com. We're getting into the smart devices and how they track and trace you with them and how the World Economic Forum uses this to build a global database of health.

CHAPTER 25 / 43 Discussion

Targeted Advertising, Voice Mood Monitoring

The discussion covers how smartphones and wearable tech use microphones to trigger targeted ads based on private conversations. Dr. Dean highlights a WEF report stating that future devices will listen to the tone of a user's voice to determine their mood and push specific data or medical surveys accordingly.

targeted advertising· smartphones· mood monitoring· world economic forum· iwatch

1:45:11 And so I'm curious though, and I want to get into the COVID bio up and you mentioned earlier too. And by the way, quickly to the callers that are still on the line in the last segment of this hour, I'll squeeze in a couple more calls. So if you want to stick around the last segment, we can take your call. But getting back to Dr. Dean, you know, one thing I noticed, and I'm curious if these smart health devices do the same thing, people have noticed that The targeted advertising on their smartphones is getting more and more intrusive and it doesn't seem to be an anomaly, it seems to be a pattern here where you talk about something in a conversation with a friend or a family, your phone sitting on the table or in your pocket and then the next time you open your phone, the targeted advertising in whatever app you're using

1:45:54 Like, oh, you're talking about going on a vacation to Jamaica with some friends at the kitchen table, and you whip out your phone, you pull up Twitter and then boom, or Facebook and then boom, oh look, here's a resort in Jamaica. Or you're talking about getting new baseball equipment, and then boom, you open up the app and it's like, oh, new baseball equipment. Do these fit smart devices have that same ability? Are they doing that too? So one of the things good question because one of the things that I've noticed is obviously they're coming out with new generations of the iWatch when they first came out with the iWatch, Fitbit, etc. I've never had either one, but they didn't do that at the beginning. But I do have an aura ring. I don't use it anymore now that I've learned this information, but they come out with a new generation. So some of them are on like third, fourth, fifth generations as they're doing that it is becoming its next computer. I mean,

1:46:44 people are spending $600 plus on these iWatches. So the new ones, yes, they're having the same thing installed into that and we're diving deeper on that research, et cetera. But your phone has been doing that forever. So yes, that's the absolute plan because ultimately, and I talked about those glucose monitors before, I was talking to a friend the other day about this just on the phone. And literally that night when I opened up my phone, I just checked a couple of social media things. I was already getting ads for those things. Now we should do the research on it, we should talk around people with the new generation of iWatch, the new generation of the Fitbit and see if that same thing pops up. But they absolutely are pushing people over to this idea because you can go over all social media now and literally all of this technology wearable stuff is in all of the ads. I mean this glucose thing is actually really big. This is kind of our latest breaking news on this thing is

1:47:38 that they're gonna tie this to the Fitbit, they're gonna tie this to the iWatch. Actually, World Economic Forum did a study again as well without people knowing about this. They were tracking people's heart attacks with their iWatch through the iHealth app on there. So absolutely what's coming is these next generations of these devices, they will also quote unquote not turn off and they will be listening to your mood. I mean, again, I go back to this report because this is their Bible. It says in here that they are going to listen to your voice and they're gonna take the mood of the tone of your voice and they're gonna use that to then push data to you to take these surveys. So absolutely that's coming. Well not only that, and this is like one step away from minority report, but also what I see the future here is that

CHAPTER 26 / 43 Discussion

Minority Report Future, Chipping Children

Dr. Dean envisions a "Minority Report" future where smart devices force people into hospitals based on automated health data. He references World Economic Forum discussions about chipping children and warns that a social credit score will eventually be tied to compliance with these wearable technologies.

minority report· social credit score· chipping kids· world economic forum· nanotechnology

1:48:27 They'll monitor your health or they'll be claiming to monitor your health and then they'll say oh you have this or you have that or you show signs of this and they'll make you go to the hospital and if you don't go, they'll send some goon squad to come mop you up and pick you up and force you to go and they'll say no the smart device says you're sick or the smart device says you're about to have a heart attack. We got to take you in and you'll have no choice to do it. And I mean, I remember Even because I don't like to do this, but I remember the couple times I had blood work done just to just you know Check on my stuff. I'm getting older I'm like, you know, it's like I don't even want to go to these places to have blood work done because I'm afraid of who's gonna get the information. And that's still, you know, mostly pen and paper. I mean, it goes through the process and everything. But it's like, I don't want any personal information of mine out there like that. But I know it's a risk you take when you go to any office and they do any kind of work for you. But this is like, you're inviting them into your house, they're there 24-7, they're gonna have all the information about you, your life, where you go. I'm curious, I mean,

1:49:28 Do you see, I know that you have kids, do young children wear the eye watches? I mean how young are kids wearing these things? I haven't seen a bunch of kids wearing them. However, I see kids all the time coming in with the iPad and the actual iPhone in front of them. So it's already in there. They're definitely getting that. But I would not doubt, I mean, there was just an article the other day that the World Economic Forum themselves came out with. And you can go find this right now. We just found it the other day where they're saying, hey, I think Russia Today actually ran with this, RT.com. They ran with it where they said, hey, we should start chipping kids. And they literally showed in their hand where the chip would go.

1:50:19 One of the spies who actually helped steal the American elections, his wife actually works in studies nanotechnology and cardiovascular health at Michigan State University. So ultimately, if you don't comply and you don't hook yourself up to these things and you don't go to the hospital when they want you to, There's a social credit score coming. This is all gonna be hooked up, which, oh, and this is what really bothers me as a doctor, right? I still physically see people in office. I help take care of people. I help kids start trying to reverse autistic situations, chronic diseases. I don't need any devices to do that. I don't even need necessarily blood tests to do that, but they're getting people to buy into the idea that you can't even be healthy

1:51:06 If you don't have a device hooked up to Wi-Fi and the internet so that you can monitor your blood sugar because you're eating too much sugar, eating crappy food, you're not taking care of yourself, you're not taking good supplementation like you guys have. They're building them into the system and people will be in it before they even know they decided to be in it. Yeah, like taking advantage of the anxiety complex that they put them in with the social media and everything else. Absolutely. And you know, we see where all of this is going. I mean, we're kind of in the opening phase of man merging with machine, merging with technology. I mean, physically uniting the two.

1:51:43 We see the future of where it's going. A lot of us don't want to go there, but do you feel it's inevitable? I mean, is this the end of man as we know it, organic man? Well, good question. So this is my thought. At the end of the day, technology has a place. I think we can use technology for good. Ultimately, technology is a neutral thing. Right now, the dark side has it, right? I think there's a time and place that we could use certain things like this. It could help us with certain stuff. But I think you can use it in a compromising kind of way, not compromising with the deep state of the new world order, but use it in a way that we can benefit people through education, through videos, etc. But ultimately, this is what I actually feel and this is how you restore a republic. This is how you restore the American people in our culture. I grew up going outside in the morning

1:52:33 And I wasn't allowed in till, you know, the streetlight went off at night. Right. So, you know, nature, et cetera, all this different stuff. I believe there is a way that we can we can, you know, connect back to our creator and we could use nature, but we could also use sparingly technology to where we could benefit people's lives. But at this point, when you are not even signing up for it and they're already like they're leading you into it without you knowing about it. At the end of the day, when you walk into a doctor's office, you have to approve being seen. And if you're not approving your medical diagnostics in your healthcare, then you're becoming a slave in the system. Ultimately, you as a patient are in control of your healthcare. You can fire or not fire your doctors, but they're bypassing the whole system.

CHAPTER 27 / 43 Discussion

COVID Bioweapon, mRNA Shedding and Depopulation

Dr. Jason Dean characterizes COVID-19 as a "planned-demic" and the vaccines as bioweapons designed for depopulation. He claims the mRNA technology causes "shedding" of spike proteins and that the vaccines are responsible for a massive increase in strokes and heart attacks, citing Dan Bongino's public regret as a turning point in awareness.

bioweapon· mrna· depopulation· ivermectin· dan bongino

1:57:42 We're back here on the Alex Jones show with our guest, Dr. Jason Dean. Dr. Dean, I want you to expand on what you call the COVID bio weapon and or the vaccines here in the last five minutes we have with you. Talk about your concerns with the vaccines and the man-made virus. Yeah, so it's definitely gate of function, but I'll be honest with everybody, anybody who knows anything about viruses, immunology, et cetera, you can go back to Plum Island off of Lyon. They've been building bioweapons since the beginning of time. So even if you did have a pandemic, which this is not, this was a planned demic, you would never handle a pandemic like you did because this is not actually how nature works. So if you actually had something going across the world like this, you would handle it completely different. You would actually, you would protect obviously the immune, the lower immune people as well as maybe the elderly, but everybody else would go outside, shake hands, have fun, go to dinner.

1:58:38 and you would actually build up natural immunity so fast, everything would be over in that quote unquote 15 days to flatten the curve. But really what happens is they've been working on a depopulation agenda since the beginning of time. That's what this has always been about. It's a globalist new world order situation. And so they finally got people to buy into something to inject in themselves. And this is not like Nazi Germany where they could put people to train cars because we wouldn't have put up with that. However, they end up selling them to fear in the media mainstream media to get this thing injected into their systems. And as I said earlier in the segment, you know, we have people at Michigan State University, literally Chinese Communist Party cabal people who've been working on this nanotechnology that actually connects to all these devices.

1:59:23 And you're seeing it, I'm sure you guys have shown it on the show, where literally clots are building up in people's cardiovascular systems. It's a spike protein that literally, the DNA tells that protein to keep building itself over and over and it proliferates throughout the body to the point where It is no longer even quote unquote a virus. There's a parasitic aspect to it. So the parasitic infections, they haven't even told people about that. That's why ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine work because it's anti-parasitics and parasites are in this vaccine. This becomes an environmental toxin, Owen. So at this point, why are people still getting sick? Why are people having problems? Because they created this in such a way that it would actually start shedding off of people who got

2:00:07 the bioweapon and that's all it is. It's not a vaccine because vaccines are out of control anyway. You have a childhood vaccine schedule that's completely insane, but now people are actually shedding this spike protein off and it's turned into environmental toxins. So when someone says, oh, I still have COVID symptoms. It's because it's an environmental toxin that we're pushing off and they literally just changed the entire timeline of Earth. So from now on, we're going to be dealing with these mRNA technologies that shed off of people. So I always tell people I can't tell people not to get a vaccine. or to get a vaccine that's not within my license. However, my opinion for myself, I would never get something like this. I mean, even Dan Bongino now came out and said it was the worst regret of his life, Owen. That tells you right there, not that he's the soothsayer of knowledge, but

2:00:57 People are freaking out and I think as you come into this fall winter season as people get the flu shots, you're unfortunately gonna see a vast decrease over the next couple of years of population because this thing is literally clogging up the tubes of the cardiovascular system and people are dropping dead of strokes and heart attacks. Yeah, it's all over the news and I mean, and your point about Dan Bongino, you know, he's a man of integrity and character and so that's why he's being honest about this because he cares about his audience. I guarantee you so many other people in media specifically probably have the same concerns that Dan has, but they're not willing to say it either because they're indirectly or directly paid for by Big Pharma, or they just don't want to admit that they were tricked or deceived about something. And I know other people too, and I'm going to try to get some of them to come on air with me too to talk about the regret.

2:01:46 Talk about, I mean, it's such an invasion. It's such a penetration of your personal bodily autonomy and you already had to sacrifice that. And now you find out that this vaccine is not only not safe and not effective, but 5% of the people that got it with the data we have now are having severe life altering side effects. Nothing like this has ever been launched on the public. I mean, even if you agree with the vaccine schedule, which I don't before this, It took 10 plus years to actually for science behind the scenes, the Fouchiers of the world to actually approve a vaccine because you have to show that it's not going to kill everybody. So they rushed through something that's never been done in less than a year.

2:02:29 Good or bad, Trump helped make that happen unfortunately. And now you have people literally dropping and they're gonna wake up really quickly because this vaccine has killed more than all the other vaccines combined in such a short period of time. Yeah, it's not even close. If you look at the VAERS charts. It's insane. I mean, I like to make sports analogies. I always make this analogy. It's like, you know, ball players and baseball are hitting, let's say, 50 home runs a year, the best home run hitters. Now they're hitting 500 in a year. 5,000 even. That's how radical the change has been. Dr. Dean, thank you so much. Folks, go to BraveTV.com to get more from Dr. Jason Dean. All right, I'm going to take some leftover callers from earlier and a couple other callers on the board. But let me just say something quickly here.

CHAPTER 28 / 43 Discussion

Veterans Call-In Show, Biden White House Gaslighting

Owen Shroyer announces he will host a veterans' call-in show on the War Room. He expresses shock at the "level of evil" and gaslighting coming from the Biden White House and Democrats like Eric Swalwell regarding the Trump affidavit, calling it the most outrageous propaganda in U.S. history.

veterans· war room· joe biden· eric swalwell· propaganda

2:03:15 Because I'm going to be hosting the war room today too. It's the veterans call-in show. So I'm going to be taking all calls from veterans on the war room today. Any veterans out there that want to get their opinion out there, voice any concerns they have, tune into the war room today. Jay Dyer going to take over the Alex Jones show in 13 minutes. But some of the stuff I have, I'm going to have to cover some of this news. Folks, I got to tell you, I know you know this, but the level just keeps going up. The lies that the Democrats and this Biden White House are telling the American people are reaching new levels. And, you know, I gotta be honest, it's dangerous, folks. I mean, this is dangerous. The accusations the Democrats are making that are completely fictitious and the lies that they are telling to the American people are so outrageous. I just... I gotta wonder what they're really thinking.

2:04:17 It's, folks, we're in a real, that is a real dark, twisted thing that they're engaged in. The lies that the White House has told today, the lies that Democrats in Congress have told today about the affidavit and Trump. Because you see it and you, I mean, you just, you recognize such evil and you are just stunned that such evil could exist because you don't resonate with that. You can't relate to that. But I got clips I'm gonna play on the war room. I mean, the lies coming from Jean Pierre, the lies coming from Eric Swalwell,

2:04:53 It's just stunning. It's just stunning to think this is the level of evil that we're fighting. This is the level of evil that we have to put up with. It's never before seen in this country's history. Never before seen. So I'm just stunned, man. I mean, the level of gaslighting, the level of evil, the level of propaganda, Because it angers you, but it also breaks your heart. It angers you because you don't like being lied to, but it breaks your heart to know that such lying scum is in charge and running the country and wants to be in charge of your future. Lying scumbags want to run your life. I mean, that is just, that proposal is so heartbreaking and gut-wrenching and stomach-churning, but that's where we're at.

CHAPTER 29 / 43 Discussion

Global Walkout, Rogan's Fear of Censorship

A caller promotes the "Global Walkout" at reignitefreedom.com, supported by Robert Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Peter McCullough. Shroyer theorizes that Joe Rogan's soft interview with Zuckerberg was a result of the backlash he faced for telling the truth about Ivermectin, leading him to avoid "outrageous truths" to protect his career.

global walkout· robert kennedy jr· ivermectin· joe rogan· censorship

2:05:50 And when you know what they really got in store for you, you understand. Of course they're known liars. They don't value human life. They don't value the truth. They don't value anything other than themselves and their agenda. But I'll stop waxing here and we'll take some calls, some final calls that have been holding here. Let's go to Tim in Ohio. Tim, you're on the Alex Jones Show. Go ahead. Hey man, I totally agree with you on absolutely everything. The Joe Rogan thing, man, he gets so close to telling the truth. It's ridiculous. I've heard him speak a couple times and just like yesterday, man, he gets so close to it. He gets these people in the palm of his hands and he just lets them go. He drops the ball every time. That's like the third time I've ever listened to him and I'll never tune into him again. I listen to you guys every single day. I respect you and you are absolutely right, man. With truth comes consequence.

2:06:43 I repost all of your videos that I can on every single social media site. I've been banned from every single social media site. 15 times or more and this last time man. I'm hanging about 30 foot up in the air right now I totally agree with you on everything you said about Rogan I don't know if you got every time I post this on social media. They ban me like instantly. It's called The global walkout. I don't know if you've heard of it, but you got some big names that are sponsoring it Robert Kennedy jr. Dr. Peter McCullough, dr. Robert Malone Chris

2:07:18 Christine Anderson and Mike Eden are all sponsoring this and launching it. And it's at reignitefreedom.com. It is a peaceful way to get what we want, I feel like. And I feel like this might be the very last peaceful thing that is tried before it turns into Well, you're right about that. We've got our free speech, we've got our Second Amendment, and we've got what we believe is our election system as a means to peacefully save the country, and that's the goal here. You know, as far as the Rogan thing, you dive a little bit deeper into the issue. So here's an example. Joe Rogan tells the truth about Ivermectin.

2:08:00 Correct. And so what happens? All of a sudden the calls to censor Joe Rogan are out, and all of a sudden Joe Rogan is under attack because he told the truth about ivermectin. So let's say, and I don't know this, but based off of what we saw with the Zuckerberg interview, perhaps after that experience, Joe Rogan didn't like the cost of telling the truth, that he made sure he doesn't tell such an outrageous truth anymore. He didn't like the calls for him to be censored. He was worried that that might do what that might do to his career. So, I mean, it would seem to me that he made a conscious decision, boy, telling the truth about Ivermectin, that really, that might almost really cost me. I don't want to get censored. I don't want to get attacked.

2:08:42 So I'm gonna back off telling the outrageous truths anymore. And so he let Zuckerberg get off with, I mean, because here's what should have happened. So Joe Rogan tells the truth about ivermectin, it goes totally viral, it becomes a top story in the world. It doesn't matter that the truth about ivermectin has been out there for years. It doesn't matter that Alex Jones said it first. Joe Rogan says it, it breaks the internet. So if Joe Rogan would have held Mark Zuckerberg's feet to the fire and said, wow, you just admitted that the Democrats, the FBI, and big tech colluded to rig an election. It would have been the biggest news story, it would have been headline news all over the press, all over the internet, trending everywhere, and Rogan didn't want it. He didn't want it.

CHAPTER 30 / 43 Discussion

Joe Rogan Cuck Fest, Price of Courage

A caller from California labels the Rogan-Zuckerberg interview a "cuck fest" and criticizes Rogan for not asking why Alex Jones was banned from Meta platforms. Shroyer agrees, stating that the price of courage is high, but the price of fear and submission to the globalist agenda is much higher.

joe rogan· mark zuckerberg· alex jones· courage· censorship

2:09:22 He didn't take it. So he either didn't want it because he's afraid of the consequences, or he didn't take it because he's committed to remaining neutral, or he was just totally asleep and tuned out when he had one of the biggest interviews up there. I don't know, but that's what happened. Thanks for the call. Let's go to Paul in California. Paul, you're on the air. Go ahead. Hello, Owen. Howdy. How are you doing? You know what? I wanted to tell you months ago about this Joe Rogan thing that you already hit the nail on the head. And other people called in and said he's a gatekeeper. I disagree. The gatekeepers are maybe those folks at Spotify or somebody else back in the dark. He's not a gatekeeper. You also touched on that, that as soon as Joe Rogan went a few steps off the reservation, he got slammed for saying I remegd him. So he wheeled back and he said, oh, maybe I don't want to go there. I want to protect my quarter billion dollar nut or whatever it is. Anyway, you're right.

2:10:19 I'm glad you said it because I wanted to say it. It was a cook fest. And now as far as why Joe Logan, he had such an opportunity to say, hey Mark, why did you knock Alex Jones off of your platform at a crucial time? Why did you do that? But he didn't put his feet to the fire. I'm not gonna hold, I'm not gonna say, oh, Joe Rogan needs to make this all about Alex Jones or censorship. And again, I'm not even, this isn't even an attack on Joe Rogan. I'm just, it's like, what an embarrassment that interview was. I mean, what an absolute embarrassment. There's a reason I think. Because you can't hold some guy's feet to the fire if you're under the table playing footsie. You know, that makes any sense to me. No, I think that's a good analogy.

2:11:10 Yeah, so I agree with you on that one and I know times are in short. You want to get a couple more calls in so I will go. Alright Paul, thank you for that. One thing is that at a time like this the price of courage is high but the price of fear down the road is much higher. I'll leave you at that. Thank you for the call Paul. Let's go to Mike in Texas. Mike, you're on the Alex Jones Show. Go ahead. One of the things that we have to remember here is that the problem we face, its greatest attribute is also its greatest weakness. And what I mean by that is that it needs people to do its job. And so we can use that. And I'm not, just hear me out, I'm not schlepping for Rogan right now. I think Rogan's a cuck. But let me just say this one thing.

CHAPTER 31 / 43 Discussion

Zuckerberg Android Persona, Sports Analogy for Rogan

A caller suggests Rogan "rope-a-doped" Zuckerberg into incriminating himself, but Shroyer argues the execution failed because the message didn't go viral. Shroyer uses a sports analogy, comparing Rogan to a star player who "missed a layup" to win the championship for "Team America" by not doubling down on the election rigging admission.

mark zuckerberg· joe rogan· fbi· election rigging· sports analogy

2:12:00 Zuckerberg is an autistic android. And so what I perceived that Rogan was doing was he was giving him rope and he's like, oh really? Oh man, you're so awesome. You're great. Oh wow, tell us more. You're that cool? And that scrub had no idea he was being played. And so what Rogan gave us is a signed, sealed envelope, an affidavit if you will, saying yes, the FBI, the DOJ and continuity of government is active right now and they are going to censor everything. Look at the redacted document that just came out today. You are not allowed to see. We are- Okay, so let me just, so let's do this, Mike. Let me respond to the notion here, and you're not the first one to say it, that Joe Rogan basically rope-a-doped Zuckerberg into saying what he's saying. Now,

2:12:50 Whether that's true or not, let me tell you why it was a total failed execution or idea on Joe Rogan's part, if that's truly the case. You already knew that the FBI, the Democrats and Big Tech rigged the election for Joe Biden. You already knew that, I already knew that, everyone in this audience already knew that. Most people don't know that and because Joe Rogan didn't press that issue on the Zuckerberg interview They're still not gonna know it. So nobody knew is finding out There's no groundbreaking information in that interview that nobody didn't know but because Joe Rogan didn't call it out directly on the air It's not gonna go viral and it's not gonna be seen Millions of times like it needs to be like when he said ivermectin worked We'll take a couple more calls here before J Dyer takes over. Let me just kind of make a sports analogy to explain

2:13:41 approach my response, if you will, to the Rogan Zuckerberg interview. I'm on Team America and I want to win. Because I know that means freedom and prosperity for all Americans. And an example worldwide for what self-government and belief in the individual can do for civilization. And just look at what America's done and the Western way of life and freedom and independence and self-government. Just look at how it's influenced the world for the best, for the better. And so I just want Team America to win. And I look at Joe Rogan as a member of Team America. I think Joe Rogan likes America. I think he likes freedom. I think he wants a prosperous future for Americans. So to watch Joe Rogan miss a layup like he did yesterday, it angers me. So it's like if I have a favorite basketball team that I like to root for and they're in the finals,

2:14:39 and one of my favorite players misses a layup to win the finals, I'm gonna be pissed! And I'm gonna say that player's a bum! He missed a layup! He cost us the championship! That's what it feels like with Joe Rogan. Here's a guy on my team, and I wanna win the championship, and he just missed a layup to win the game. Because, yeah, oh, he got Zuckerberg to admit they rigged the election. We already knew that! But because Joe Rogan wouldn't commit that message, and wouldn't force that message, and wouldn't double down on that message, and get Zuckerberg to admit what really happened, it's not gonna go viral, and only the people that already know that's the story are gonna hear from it.

2:15:27 But if Joe Rogan would have said, wow, sounds like the Democrat Party, the FBI, and big tech colluded to rig an election, it would have been the number one story today, and then it would have actually had more impact. But I think it's gonna fall deaf because he just had a fluff cuck fest. Alright, couple more calls before Jay Dyer takes over. Let's go to Tony in Wisconsin. Tony, you're on the air, go ahead. Hi, so yeah, I don't know with Rogan. I don't know, like I like the way that he went with the whole vaccine thing, but he was all like, well, you got a supplement or looking just staying healthy and everything. But I don't know, when he did the Gina Carano interview, he like,

CHAPTER 32 / 43 Discussion

Tactical Trap Theory, The Great Reset Number One on Amazon

A caller defends Rogan's interview style as a "tactical trap" to keep Zuckerberg on the set. Alex Jones then breaks in to announce that his book, "The Great Reset and the War for the World," has reached number nine on the global Amazon charts and is number one in over 40 categories, calling it a "blueprint to the Death Star."

joe rogan· mark zuckerberg· the great reset· amazon· best seller

2:16:23 He threw her off of the trail, like you could tell she was awake and she had a good idea and she was on the right path and he was actively like, no, no, I don't think there's anything like that going on, da da da da da. And I lost respect for him. Well, I haven't seen that one. Well, you should check that one out. But look, I mean, and thank you for the call. It's like I said earlier, that's why I don't watch the Rogan podcast. I mean, it's just as simple as that. Let's go to Matt in Wisconsin. Matt, you're on the air. Go ahead. Hey, Go. Can you hear me okay? Oh yeah, we gotcha. I think Rogan, since you know he's a little bit in the middle there, kind of set a tactical trap for him.

2:17:08 for Zuckerberg, because you know he won't come on if you call him a straight up communist or something. So you kind of got to put the hook in. And he was able to pull some nonverbal stuff. I don't know, you didn't play the kick clip when Rogan did mention to him communism and Zuckerberg like scoffed at the idea. And Rogan's a really smart guy, but he's also kind of in the middle. And I don't know if you remember how he talked to Jones during nine 11. He also kind of does play both sides, you know? So I don't think it's fair to hold a person like Rogan up to info war standard because like, you know, that's like holding a Spartan, you know, next to like Italian or French fighter.

2:17:49 You know, so like there's a little bit of a differentiation. I think Rogan's really good at interviews because he's kind of in the middle. Obviously if you go all barrels blasting at Zuckerberg, he's just gonna walk off the set. And you know, obviously... And you know what? You might be right about that. You might be right, but that's what he should have done. Because that is the biggest story and he had it right there. How our elections are rigged. Kind of a big story. Is that worth maybe making a guest walk off the set by calling him out on that? Might be, but I guess it wasn't. Ladies and gentlemen, if millions of people get this book, our funding problems will be over and it's starting to happen. That's why I said, yeah, go to info workstore.com, get the book and start shipping in a couple of weeks. The great reset in the war for the world. But I said, go to Amazon because it's the number one book chart in the world. And if it goes to number one, not a political, not of history, not of us history, it's already number one over 40 categories like political science, you name it. 40 plus categories is number one ladies and

2:18:55 Ladies and gentlemen, drum roll please, of Books in the World, the Great Reset and the War for the World is one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine. We are now number nine in the world. This is major. This is political. This could fund our war chest. Just go to amazon.com everybody and buy 10 copies. Send this blueprint to the Death Star and the New World Order. Cause you read this, you know, their whole plan, how to stop them. Hit the great reset the war over the world. Now it's going to go to number one. What do you make of that? Welcome back to the office. John, Sean, your guest host, Jay Dyer, Jay's analysis.

CHAPTER 33 / 43 Discussion

Siege Warfare, Rockefeller Lockstep and SPARS Documents

Guest host Jay Dyer explains that the West is under a "siege" designed by psychological warfare experts to collapse existing systems. He cites the Rockefeller "Lockstep" and "SPARS" documents, which predicted public outcry against medical and political failures as a precursor to overhauling the system with mass surveillance and international control.

jay dyer· rockefeller foundation· lockstep· spars document· psychological warfare

2:19:34 Today I want to talk about the signs that we see that we're actually under siege. You hear Alex talk all the time about siege, siege, siege. What does this mean? Well, this is a type of warfare where you conduct For example, if someone's holed up in a city, right? You conduct siege to attack their food supply, to attack their water, whatever. We are under siege. And so the best way to understand what's going on is to get out of this model of thinking that it's government ruled by incompetency. We're not ruled by incompetent people. We're ruled by highly competent psychological warfare experts

2:20:16 and corporate elite who have a layer of government control out in front of them that takes all the heat. And as I was looking back through the Rockefeller lockstep document, I was reminded of the fact that in the scenario of lockstep, which by the way, I'm glad Alex hit on that this week because it ties in with the spars document. Did you notice that what has happened in the last week ties in perfectly with what these documents said would be the next phase of the plan. They said that in the wake of corruption, CDC failure, Fauci failure, et cetera. They don't mention Fauci by name, but they are basically talking about these characters.

2:20:55 There would be a public outcry against the failure of the medical system as it is, a public outcry against the politicians, outcry against these officials that botched, failed, mismanaged, and so forth. Now, if you remember back to the events of the Big Nine, right, the Big 9-11 event, We had a lot of people come out to analyze the event and said, you know, sometimes in the world of intelligence, the biggest failures are the biggest successes. Why would that be? Well, in the wake of big failures, you get the justification for now we need to overhaul the system. Now we need billions more in funding. Now we need mass surveillance everywhere. Now we need to fix all the supposed flaws which the system actually wanted to be there to begin with.

2:21:45 Think back to a few years ago i think was the people the cdc right ahead of the cdc was saying that it's time to blow up the old system. Intentionally so what i'm trying to introduce to you is the idea that the problems the chaos that occurs in the system. is not there by accident, it's not something that was not calculated in the big game plan. It was something that was part of the plan. They said in the SPARS document, for example, which matches up to our years, even though it's listed as in the future, they said that after the outcry against the CDC and these different agencies,

2:22:22 the people would clamor for a salvation, clamor for something better because the existing system and its leaders, its politicians were giant failures. Likewise, Lockstep noted that quote, by 2025, people grew weary of the top-down control and the failures of their leaders. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated. Disaffected youth and people who saw their status of opportunity slip away I incited much civil unrest and then it goes on to give examples of civil unrest and it talks about how they clamored for called for a salvation somebody to come and save them.

2:23:04 After the world had basically in some way in some various ways collapsed. In this scenario and if you don't remember this scenario was basically the covid scenario this is a twenty ten rocket bill document that said that in the wake of the covid what they call the wuhan virus in the document out of china. face masks, temporary checks at airports and so forth. All of these controls would stay in place, biometric IDs for everyone, getting rid of cars in industry, shutting down travel, airlines, etc. This would lead to, eventually it even says the banning of cars, right, for the purposes of the Green Agenda.

CHAPTER 34 / 43 Discussion

Fabian Socialist Model, 2050 Technocratic Goal

Jay Dyer describes the "Fabian Socialist" model of gradual change, symbolized by a turtle, used to bring in technocracy unnoticed. He asserts that the global elite, including groups like the World Economic Forum and the Bank for International Settlements, aim for a total AI-driven global government by the year 2050.

fabian socialism· technocracy· world economic forum· carroll quigley· 2050

2:23:47 Innovation comes to a standstill and a halt. As a result, people cry out against their national government's failures. In the wake of crying out against these inept politicians, these corrupt leaders, corrupt presidents and prime ministers, they cried out and clamored for an international body that would help alleviate this, that would solve the problems of the politicians. If you know in my series as we've covered the writings of the global elite, we've been through some 50 or 60, 60 if we count the white papers and on top of the big fat books and tomes of the elite of Britain, we know that they want to bring in a new plan. There's an existing system, the medical system, education system, the internet, the economic system, right? There's these existing systems that they want to move into a new phase and replace.

2:24:40 Most people think when they hear this kind of stuff or they're new to this material, they think that it's going to be a top-down tyranny. The government's going to march in and put you into this or that gulag. No, typically, I think in the documents what we see is not a top-down immediate control. There is heavy handedness at times. We saw during COVID, especially places like Australia, Mike, we had a lot of top-down control there. And it became a real 1984 hellhole. But that wasn't everywhere, and there was a lot of resistance, obviously. And so as a result, they realized that they would have to Gradually bring this in if you think about the fabian socialist model their images. A turtle and so it's a gradual bringing in of the technocracy so that it goes unnoticed right so that's not overnight that's a much more effective way of doing this than the heavy handed iron fisted bringing of the top down control.

2:25:36 So I want to go through about 10 signs that we're under siege, and that this is actually a plan. Again, I mentioned two documents already that say that the outcry against the failure of public leaders would lead to a cry for an international global government, which already exists, by the way. It's just kind of in the shadow. But it's now emerging, right? And we see it emerge most clearly through the Great Reset, which is really the World Economic Forum, which is a public version or arm of basically Bilderberg. And so the key takeaway here is that they want you mad at politicians. You understand that a lot of the global elite writers believe in rule by experts, scientific government, they call it, the managerial system, the managerial class, and thus the more ridiculous politicians appear,

2:26:30 The more they believe that over time people are gonna clamor for and call for yes let me be ruled by a i let me be ruled by international you and your accuracy let me be ruled by unelected elites because. Elections in these kinds of things they just don't work you say that's where they wanna go that's the end goal. So here we are where we still have the elections or at least the appearance of elections, at least local elections are a lot more, I guess, viable than the presidential election at this point. And so how do we get if we're one of the global elite, we don't think about in their mindset, how do we get from here to there? Well, one thing that we would want to do is get people distrusting, disliking the existing system, which at least in terms of its public structure, runs on the basis of elected officials.

2:27:19 Now, we know that the shadow government has had a big hand for, according to Dr. Carol Quigley, a century in selecting and influencing those big elections on a national scale. And increasingly, the global elite have been influencing local elections, especially in key areas in a lot of ways, and not just elected officials, but also judges too, right? So this affects all the branches. And so this is a gradual slow takeover from shadowy elite groups, which are themselves really run by Fortune 100, Fortune 500, the top richest families in the world. They run through entities like the Bank for National Settlements, which is sort of the central bank of central banks. They're connected together with all the biggest private foundations.

2:28:06 NGOs, think tanks, they're all working towards the exact same goal that I'm telling you. And all of the books say this. That's why this is so crucial to look at their writings, their white papers and their techniques and tactics. And what we see in the Spars document and the Lockstep document is they're always a few steps ahead because they're planning for the failure because they want the existing system to collapse. Now it may not be overnight, it may not be an economic collapse tomorrow, it may not be an EMP tag tomorrow, it may not be a cyber polygon tomorrow. But we might see staggering versions of these things in the next 10 years, again, getting us to the goals of 2030, 2040, and 2050. Those are key decades, key periods where they want to have certain things complete in their long-term game plan up to 2050. 2050 is slated to be the full-on total AI depop global government. That's the year they've chosen in many, many documents

CHAPTER 35 / 43 Discussion

Rule by Experts, Scientific Governance Scam

The elite are exploiting legitimate criticisms of corrupt politicians to promote "scientific governance" by unelected experts. Dyer argues that the collapse of the fiat currency system is a planned event intended to make the public clamor for an international solution, following a "problem-reaction-solution" model described by writers like Bertrand Russell.

scientific governance· managerial class· fiat system· bertrand russell· world government

2:29:04 There might be a little variation, but basically by 2050 is the goal to have the full on Brave New World technocratic nightmare Terminator Skynet system in place. So here we are, a few decades out from that. What are the things we're gonna see in the next few decades? Don't go anywhere, this is Alex Jones Show. Welcome back to the Alex Jones show, I'm your guest host Jay Dyer of Jason analysis. We were just discussing the transition that the elite have planned the global technocrats have planned to move us away from the previous system into the new system, which is ruled by experts scientific government supposedly it's not actually scientific. It's just complete oligarchy and control, but it's given the title scientific governance now.

2:29:49 Well, on the one hand, it's kind of true that politicians are ridiculous, right? I mean, not all of them, but for the most part, kind of everybody senses that there's just something off with the fake two-party system and the idea of, well, you only get these two options and everything is boiled down to basically an oversimplified choice of some person, you know, hundreds of miles away, a thousand miles away in DC that you don't know anything about. And so, you know, I think that's a big part of it. other than the slogans that you've heard them say on the TV. And everybody knows that they're sort of bound to corrupt interests and to private interests and whatnot. And so I think everybody kind of senses that there's something broken with the existing system. I'm not saying every politician is corrupt or bad, but on the whole, we kind of think that there's something just kind of goofy about this. It doesn't really make sense.

2:30:40 So the legitimate criticism that one might have of the problems in the existing system is precisely what the elite are exploiting. That's the point I'm trying to make here, right? They're trying to say, look at all these problems in the politicians. Look at all the problems in the existing system. Look at how your money's collapsing, it's inflated, which by the way is their own plans. They were the ones that planned for this fiat system. Getting us away from sound currency and so forth sound money That's all by design and then they blame everybody for their plans. We saw this, for example, in Bertrand Russell, many of the writings of the elite that they would blame humankind for the invention of atomic bomb, nuclear bomb, and then say that, well, in order to save humanity for the evil inventions, we're gonna have to institute a world government to police all this. And then turn around and say, we the elite invented the nuclear bombs because we're smarter than everybody.

2:31:39 I mean, literally the constant double speed, constant lies, constant deception. But again, remember, the goal here is not to help you, not to lead you into a utopia, not to give you a fair system. It is to get rid of you and to put in place a system of complete 100% total technocratic control. And eventually it would be not run by humans, but by computers, a complete AI system running supposedly on perfect math and logic. Then it could bypass human weaknesses, human emotionalism, human flaws. That's the idea of technocracy. I think it's kind of crazy. It's something more akin to a cult, not a cult, but a cult, a belief in the idea that you can have a perfect system run by computers. It's kind of ridiculous.

CHAPTER 36 / 43 Discussion

Batman Dark Knight Analogy, Revolutionary Chaos

Using the plot of "The Dark Knight Rises," Jay Dyer compares the character Bane to modern revolutionary movements. He argues that elites use "wrecking ball" revolutionaries to destroy the existing order, only to replace it with an even more corrupt and oppressive system, similar to the chaos of the French Revolution.

batman· bane· french revolution· gotham· revolutionary movements

2:32:27 But that's what these people do put their hope and faith in. So what are the signs then that we're under siege being moved into this kind of a system? Again, to put us under a managerial class of rule by experts that is always contrasted against, and will be especially in the coming years, contrasted against the folly of the corrupt politician. Look at Biden, look at all the scandals, look at this. They're so silly, they're so goofy. Don't we need rational governance? Don't we need computer governance that's not subject to the flaws and scandals of some goofy politician, some ridiculous boomer who can't even figure out how to use the bathroom, right? I mean, doesn't that sound kind of reasonable? That's what it's playing on. Look at how Fauci failed us. Look at the failures of government. But the reality is that they want to bring in a more heavy-handed governance. Think about Batman Dark Knight as an example. If you remember,

2:33:27 In the plot, you have the character Bane, who is sort of this revolutionary, right? He comes from the Far East and he pops up as this mysterious figure in the underworld. And he engages in all these actions of terror basically throughout Gotham. He collapses Gotham's stock market and he does all these revolutionary terror events. And he talks about all the corruption in Gotham. And he's right. Right, I mean there's a lot of corruption, there's crime, and he's actually working with this and doing more organized crime and chaos to bring about the collapse of the existing Gotham system. Because in his mind it's all justified because I was born in adversity, right? He was born in adversity, he was born in the flames of struggle and darkness. And so for him,

2:34:20 It's justified to bring in this better system. But what happens when Bain comes to power? Do you guys remember in the plot? Well, it's an even worse system and it mimics the French Revolution, right? There's guillotines and you have Sandman, Cillian Murphy's up there sitting up top this pyramid where he's judging everybody and off of their heads. And it's very reminiscent again of the French Revolution. He's sort of a Robespierre kind of figure. And it becomes a total chaos. So it's even worse. The system that Bain brings in, the revolutionary system is even worse than the already existing

2:34:57 Gotham, you know, elite structure, which I guess you could say Bruce Wayne represents sort of the billionaire oligarch character, right? Versus this revolutionary anarcho-communist system that Bain wants to bring in. And it's even worse. And it's even more corrupt. Everything just falls apart. So the reason, again, that the elite love revolutionary movements and they love the kind of radicalism that we're seeing pushed everywhere is because it's a wrecking ball. It's there to destroy the existing system. And the liberal revolutionaries, these kinds of people, they're just the dupes who are the tools of the system that think that they're gonna profit from it. They're gonna be in power. They're gonna get goodies out of all this. They're gonna be the ones that are the true heroes and this kind of stuff. And they're the ones that of course always go out first because the revolution isn't run and isn't based on what they think it is. It's actually run by rival oligarchs and rival elites.

CHAPTER 37 / 43 Discussion

Attack on the Family, Depopulation Agenda

The cultural attack on the "patriarchal" family structure is framed as a social engineering tactic for depopulation. Dyer describes the family as a "firewall" protecting individuals from the state; by destroying the family and biological gender norms, the elite can more easily manage an atomized population.

family· patriarchy· depopulation· social engineering· firewalls

2:35:54 Likewise, the system wants us to be furious at the notion of a nation state. The nation state's the failure. The existing healthcare system is a failure. It's got to be replaced. And all of the movements that we're seeing are about that. The family is an oppressive structure. The family is a patriarchal structure that is oppressive and it rapes women and all of this nonsense. And that is just totally a cover, 100% for depopulation to make sure that you don't reproduce. That's it. That's the only purpose of that. Has no other purpose than that. So the movement and attack on biological gender, the attack on men and women at the same time, it's a two-pronged attack.

2:36:37 Right, they want you to either be this crazy purple haired feminist social justice warrior or this freak in cell guy who hates women. That's a two pronged social engineering 100% engineered attack. So the removal of the family is key and that's what all the global leads say. Get rid of the family because the family is a firewall. It's a kind of progenitor of a tradition, of a heritage. And just like nation states are bad, so little bitty nation states, aka families, are bad. Right? Think about the nation. Think about the state that you live in, or the US and the states. Then smaller, you get your city. Then smaller, you get your family.

2:37:16 All of these are firewalls. They're kind of like walls, concentric circles inside your city protecting you from something bigger. And so to understand that we're under siege, you have to understand that the culture is all geared towards destroying all of that, just wrecking ball, mowing down the whole thing. Every area of society will be overhauled and changed. And the easiest way to do that Is not to logically debate with people to try to convince them of globalism not to do this but to actually just let the. Forces of chaos control chaos erupt and destroy the system from within with the promotion of the elites who want to bring it in promote the radical causes. Because it destroys existing order to bring in the new order.

CHAPTER 38 / 43 Discussion

One World Religion, Destruction of Tradition

Jay Dyer discusses how the Rockefeller family and other foundations have funded seminaries to water down traditional religious beliefs. This effort aims to replace wholesome traditions with a "one world religion" that supports global government, leaving individuals alienated and easier to control.

rockefeller· union theological seminary· vatican ii· world council of churches· tradition

2:38:04 I'm Jay Dyer of Jay's Analysis. Welcome back to the Alex Jones Show. I'm your guest host, Jay Dyer of Jay's Analysis. We're looking at the 10 signs that we are under siege and that the siege is intended to collapse the country, the West by design to bring us into the new system that the elites have planned, particularly the technocratic elite. So we talked first about the attack on humankind themselves in the sense of gender, family, I want to add to that, number two would be the attack on tradition, the attack on religion, the attack on people maintaining their own heritage and passing that on through a family. A family is just a little bitty sort of transmitter of a tradition, right? It's a little society that then transmits these traditions. And if you want to destroy a nation, if you want to destroy a country or a people group or a continent,

2:38:56 One of the key ways to do that is not just go after the notion of the family and picture it as this oppressive structure, this fascist patriarchal structure. You also want to go after the conception of religion because religion is something that binds the people, it holds them together as a commonality, right? And even though in the US we have various different religious groups, there are still dominant religions in the West such as Christianity. which have a kind of a general idea that people follow relating to the Bible, relating to common law, Roman law, etc. All part of this heritage of the Western tradition. And so it's thus necessary to break that down, to destroy that in order to destroy the existing culture.

2:39:41 And there's many ways in which that has occurred in terms of religion, but particularly religion and tradition are under attack through things like seminaries, things like private foundations that put money into various schools to change people's theological beliefs. The Rockefellers, as one example, over the years put millions and millions of dollars into various seminaries, including creating their own seminaries, which like Union Theological Seminary, which would then promote very watered down liberal versions of Protestantism. And eventually within a few decades, most of the mainline Protestant denominations, for example,

2:40:17 caved into textual liberalism, higher criticism, and basically became adjuncts of the National Council of Churches and the World Council of Churches, which are there really just totally to promote world government. That's it. And you can see that very clearly in the history of American Protestantism in the 20th century. Now I'm not leaving out the other groups, the other religions as well have been subject to this same kind of influence and control and persuasion and engineering. Roman Catholic Church, especially after Vatican II, the Orthodox churches as well through their seminaries and through their foundations and through the money that pours into those, all of this is from the same structure, the same power group that intends on moving Americans away from people in the West

2:40:59 anything resembling traditional ideas at all. So while it's true that at times it's necessary to debate amongst various groups and churches and religions and whatnot, we do have to do that. From the vantage point of the elite, they don't really care about that so much as they care about making sure that anything healthy, anything wholesome, anything traditional, gotta go. So it's all painted as fascist, as oppressive, as patriarchal and evil. Because they're actually the things that are healthy, wholesome, and lead to a fulfilling, meaningful life. So the idea that you're going to have a meaningful, fulfilling life as an alone, consumerist, city-dwelling, rootless bug man, is if that's going to give you fulfillment, is only going to make you miserable, only going to make you alone, atomized, alienated, and ready to step into your coffin. I mean, coon pod. That's it. That's the goal.

CHAPTER 39 / 43 Discussion

Cultural Warfare, Opium Wars Parallel

The demonization of the nation-state is a key strategy to move toward internationalism. Dyer parallels modern cultural decay—including the flood of pornography and fentanyl—to the British use of opium against China, characterizing it as a 100% intentional psychological warfare attack on the domestic population.

nation state· cultural warfare· opium wars· fentanyl· psychological warfare

2:41:58 So it's marching you to, leading you to your own self-willed giving up and collapse and death, self-destruction. That's the whole point of all of it. And that's also the point of one world religion that's being engineered and steered through the big mainline churches and groups. Next, as we said, those firewalls is to get rid of one of those firewalls is the nation state. Now, you could argue that the nation state has been on decline for a long time, and that's true. But the reason they intentionally want it to be a problem is because their only idea, their only goal here is to just say, don't you want the global government? You see, see all the problems of nation states. Look at the wars. Look at the chaos.

2:42:45 Look at Russia versus America in the West, Russia versus Ukraine, look at China versus this other. Don't you want a solution to all the wars? Wouldn't it be rational and reasonable to not have all these wars? And that sounds rational, but it's not reality. It's not realistic. It's a pipe dream. And so the demonization of the nation state is another one of these key elements and proofs of siege throughout all the global elite writings. They're all to a man, 100% internationalists. There's no such thing as the nation state. It doesn't even exist. And so the existing structures have to fall

2:43:25 But rather than attacking them in some overt way with another country or something like that, which may occur, they may engineer a giant global war, who knows? Why not just let them rot from within? And it's part of warfare, it's part of the history of warfare to attack in various means and in various ways, okay? Warfare is not just physical kinetic warfare. There's economic warfare, sanctions. There's siege, where you might attack people's food supply. people's supply chains. There's ideological warfare, psychological warfare, cultural warfare.

2:44:06 Let's flood this country with the most degenerate gross porn. Let's flood this place with fentanyl and drugs by design as a form of warfare. Everybody knows the British did this. Why does this seem strange or something impossible when everybody knows, even every liberal has lectures out there about the opium wars. Britain went to war in a covert way through flooding opium into China. as a form of cultural warfare. Anybody with any sense can see that we are under 100% total cultural warfare attack. And you can go read people from the Pentagon, from the army who talk about this, even some of the Satanists in the army, like Colonel Michael Aquino, who wrote the army's psychological warfare doctrine from mind war to side war, where he talks about the masses are the real enemy here, you see.

CHAPTER 40 / 43 Discussion

Economic Warfare, Centralized Blockchain Control

Jay Dyer explains that inflation and the fiat currency system are forms of theft designed to rob future generations. He warns that the ultimate goal is to transition the world into a "Universal Basic Income" system powered by a centralized digital currency or "Fedcoin," allowing for total economic control.

federal reserve· inflation· fiat currency· ubi· fedcoin

2:45:02 All of us, the domestic population is the target, is the problem. Not everybody in the government's evil, I'm not saying that. Not every corporation's evil. But the Fortune 100, Bank for National Settlements, the people that run the world for the most part, or at least the Atlantis' Western power block, they are 100% committed to the Malthusian agenda and the end goal that they want to get us to requires going through these steps. So the collapsing of the nation state, key there, number three. Currency, right? Money is a form of energy transfer, right? It's a symbolic representation of exchange or an exchange of energy time, right, is what it can stand for. So another way to attack a country is to attack its currency, its means of exchange. Now, we've been under that kind of attack for a long time, all the way back to Jekyll Island, the Federal Reserve, all this kind of stuff, right? Because that allowed for a not

2:45:59 a government entity, but a private entity with a government face to control the printing of the money to control the money supply. So the money printer goes, right? And that deflates the currency. It makes the dollar have less purchasing power, less value. And especially after Nixon, the shock doctrine, we move off of the gold standard, it gets even worse. Now it's just pure fiat. But a pure fiat currency and inflation is a form of theft. It's actually robbing future generations of their wealth and robbing you in the present time of your wealth and your savings because the value of your savings just depletes over time, especially in the past couple years. What it's depleted like 10, 20% each year, something crazy like that. So attacking the currency economic warfare is a key strategy in this battle. And

2:46:53 Yeah, we know about the sanctions with Russia and the problems in the economy via the war with Russia in terms of Ukraine and the American sanctions. But in the long term, there's a much bigger play at work here, which is to attack economics Period to go after economics itself the idea of attaining wealth having personal rights and sovereignty that's under attack. Because that will be transitioned into the notion of the universal basic income some version of fed coin or a universal basic digital coin.

2:47:29 which will be a centralized blockchain. Another wrong with blockchains, there's different ones. There's decentralized things like Bitcoin. And then there's centralized things that are problematic. You notice Klaus and the World Economic Forum a few years ago, maybe two years ago, put out a list of their top cryptos that they think would be perfect for world adoption because of their centralization control mechanism. Welcome back to the Alex Jones show. I'm your guest host Jay Dyer of Jay's analysis. I want to remind you too, if you're in the Orlando or the Florida area in general, you can come to my event. I'll be doing another live event September 3rd in Orlando. You can get the tickets over on my social media as it's pinned on most of my social media.

CHAPTER 41 / 43 Discussion

Orlando Live Event, The Global Debt Scam

Jay Dyer promotes his upcoming live event in Orlando on September 3rd, covering philosophy, Hollywood, and the occult. He returns to the topic of the economy, comparing the national debt to a "goofy" infinite credit card scam that is mathematically destined to destroy the country.

jay dyer· orlando· philosophy· national debt· credit card debt

2:48:11 or underneath the videos, my YouTube channel, I have the links there to get the tickets. There's a limited number of tickets and we've sold more than half. So there's only, I don't know about a week or so before that event, we had a great event in Nashville. We had a huge crowd show up 120, 25, somewhere in there, which for me was a great number. We had a lot of fun. We had about seven hours of live discussion, lectures, talks. There'll be more people at the Orlando event. We'll be discussing Renaissance art and symbolism. We'll be discussing my new book about philosophy and symbolism, meta-narratives. We'll be covering Plato. We'll be covering logic. We'll be covering apologetics, atheism, debates, et cetera. My beautiful wife Jamie will be lecturing on Hollywood and the occult.

2:48:58 So it's gonna be a lot of fun and we'll do a book signing too. So go get your tickets at the links on the website or on my social medias. Now we were talking about the signs that were under siege to get us to the end goal of the global technocratic government. And so in order to get us there, you got to break the existing system. You got to explode it from within by design. What's the best way to do that? Is it to force it down everybody's throat to crush the existing system overly? No, no, it's to let it fall apart and foster the forces of chaos and decay from within by design. That's how this system, that's the key to understanding what's going on. So we just talked about

2:49:40 collapsing the currency to bring in the UBI, to utilize the Fiat system, to run up the debt, the, the derivatives bubbles, the, the, the housing bubbles, all of these bubbles that are intentionally created, which eventually over time have to give way. You can't run up infinite debt, right? What's the national debt trillions and trillions of dollars. You can't do that and expect the system to continue working. Eventually it's going to fall apart. And everybody knows that since we've gone away from sound money hard money. There's just we're just kicking the can down the road and the more that they print the more inflation the more stimulus checks that they give out the worst it is down the road. I remember when i was a kid i remember thinking what do you always just get credit cards.

2:50:27 Why don't people just keep getting different credit cards and then just charging everything, and you could basically just live your entire life on infinite credit cards, and then you die, and who cares, right? Maybe you die with $50 million credit card debt, but who cares, because you're dead. So I mean, that was like a goofy thing. I remember thinking about it as like a 10 year old, but that's actually the way our country runs. Okay, so it makes no sense. No sense really. Oh, he could just keep printing more. And like the top economists tell you that, right? They actually say things like we can just print more money.

2:51:03 And it's hard to know, are they that dumb or are they actually malicious and know that that will eventually destroy the country and destroy the economy? I mean, who knows, right? But we know that from the elite perspective, they're not dumb. They know that the world runs on giant scams. I just did a talk the other day on my YouTube channel. If you didn't see it, go watch it. It was a good three hour fun dive we did on the top scams. I think I did top 10 or 15 scams and how the whole world is really run on concentric circles of scams. And one of the best ways to see that is in fact, the currency fiat system. Next up is increasing controls that especially through the so-called chaos and pandemic and the fear, oh, got to scare the crap out of everybody. Now all the controls that were seized, government controls, corporate controls,

CHAPTER 42 / 43 Discussion

Emergency Powers Scam, Mask Conformity Study

The segment argues that emergency powers seized during the pandemic were never intended to be returned. Dyer cites studies suggesting that mask mandates and social distancing were not about health, but were psychological warfare tools used to break down the public and test social conformity.

emergency powers· covid-19· masks· psychological warfare· nato

2:51:55 No, now you don't get any of that back. Even though everybody who questioned the last two years, everybody who questioned Fauci, everybody who questioned all that was right, even though we were all right. All of the power grabs that occurred, no, you don't get any of that back, sorry. And that's what everybody who was a quote conspiracy theorist said, warned about. They're never gonna give you back these liberties that they're taking under the guise of emergency powers. It was all a scam from the get go. And this is what we said the whole time. I did a video about how The Karonka virus and the whole thing was about economic integration, consolidation and taking over. That was it. Now, I mean, you had other goals down the road. And how did I know that? Did I know that because of what was in this document? It was in lockstep. I mean, they said in the first scenario that government will be heavy handed. They will seize tremendous amounts of power and they will do it in order to provoke the people.

2:52:58 Do you hear what i'm saying they're telling you that the intention was to make you mad to provoke you. So that you do what well it could be to get you to crazy stuff for the kind of provocateur agent provocateur type of thing but actually more likely is that get you to clamor and call out for their solution problem reaction solution. They cause the problem they get you to react then they give you the prepackaged solution. The whole thing, that's how the whole system works. And if you can't figure that out, you will constantly be gas lit and abused by the system. So tighter bureaucracy, tighter controls, which Spars document and Lockstep documents talked about, causing the public to cry out for their savior. But the savior is the system's package salvation, which is just deeper into the control matrix and the control chaos. More top-down control.

2:53:53 Remember the, I'm thinking of member bears. Remember the situation with masks, right? You would get caught early on. Oh, masks don't work. Oh, actually they do work. Oh, but you have to wear them because they don't work, but it's a sign of social conformity. And then it just got more and more ridiculous with the mask. Put them on in your house, wear two masks, wear three masks. Wear them when you're alone on the webcam so that you don't hurt people's, just crazy stuff. So did acquiescing make anything better? No, the more you gave in, the more you were abused. It's like a relationship, right? With an abusive guy or whatever. And the girls are always like, I can make him better. I can fix him, I can change him. And then it just gets worse and worse and worse and worse.

2:54:50 You're not going to fix big daddy corporate government. They're not going to start being nice to you because you keep going along with crazy nonsense rules. And the nonsense crazy rules are a form of psychological warfare too. Do you understand that? That's key to understand. They even said, what was it, the Harvard study, right? They even said the requirements about the mask and all this and the social distancing aren't about health. They're about conformity and psychological warfare and breaking people down. That's what they said. It was in the Canadian government's admissions and it's in the NATO psychological warfare document because the Canadian government was running on the NATO PSYOP documents in their strategy for pushing these things. Next up, getting through these before the segment ends,

CHAPTER 43 / 43 Discussion

Food Supply Attack, Austerity and the Pod Life

A key part of the "siege" is the attack on the food supply, transitioning the public from traditional meats to "bugs" or synthetic alternatives. Dyer warns of a future of "total austerity" where people own nothing—including their clothes—and live in "pods" as part of a global circular economy.

food supply· bugs· austerity· circular economy· hg wells

2:55:40 Can't even read my notes here. Food attack! Attack the food, that's a key part of siege, right? You're holed up in your castle, we gotta make sure that they don't get their deliveries of giant ham hocks and meats. Can't get your goblets and your meats. If you're the king in the castle, you gotta be starved out, starving. So not just starvation, but attack on the logistics of the food supply. The mainline diet of the American itself is a psychological warfare attack. It's garbage, what most people eat. When you go in the grocery store, all the stuff that is in the middle of the grocery store is not food. All the stuff that's on the outside ring, that's the food, right? The meats and this kind of stuff.

2:56:22 So the diet itself has been an attack for years, the corporate diet. Now it's getting even crazier because you're going to eat bugs and or you're going to eat human meat. So no more cows, because cows destroy the environment supposedly. All that is is an attack on your diet. And siege is a key, in fact all the global elites, whether it's Charles Galton Darwin, Bertrand Russell, H.G. Wells, they all have chapters on food, controlling and taking over the food supplies to not just starve people out, but transition them into diets that genetically change them. That's how crazy it is.

2:56:59 Food attack, is that one of them? Yes, so we're under siege. Media censorship, control, toxic culture, another key thing. Flood the culture with degenerate art, so-called. It's not actually art, it's just a weapon. That's it. And a large portion of the pop music, a large portion of the movies, the video games, the media is 100% just a toxic warfare attack on you. That's it. That's all it exists to do is to toxify your mind, to poison you with various lies and mind viruses. Not everything, but a large portion of it. Next up, halt innovation, bring in austerity. The push towards you not having a home, you not owning anything, the circular economy, you rent everything, including your clothes. There are people pushing this now. You won't even own your own clothes, you won't own books. You will live in a pod and rent everything. Bring in total austerity, tiny living being pushed amongst millennials and zennials, right? Gen Z or whatever.

2:58:01 Siege, we are under siege. So the last one, stage fear, expect more events, totally intended to just create fear so that we capitulate and so that we all cry out for salvation from the shadowy elites that actually engineer the chaos. They'll blame the politicians and then we'll run to them for an international salvation. I've heard it thousands and thousands of times and I know you have as well. Why don't more people stand up for freedom? Why don't more people fight the globalists and their tyranny? And the answer is, when you fight them, they come after you.