InfoWars Media Landscape and Free Speech Suppression
The broadcast opens with a critique of mainstream media propaganda and the rise of information warfare. It highlights legislative threats to free speech, specifically Canada's Bill C-63, which could impose life sentences for hate crimes and regulate independent media like Rebel News. The segment contrasts the viewership of independent figures like Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson against traditional cable networks while dismissing claims of Russian collusion.
infowars· propaganda· first amendment· bill c-63· rebel news· rachel maddow· censorship
00:00 While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Visit infowars.com forward slash show and support the InfoWars. These are the worst of times for the media in this country We live in an age of information warfare where propaganda is not simply a weapon It is the entire field of battle. You can't imagine the things that he's going to do Mexico, Canada We can't go to Canada because eventually Canada will become an ex-to America and shoot visitors to The White House Yeah That means he could shoot The First Lady Using martial law against the American people Terminate the Constitution Might be sent to jail or their rights might be suppressed especially minority groups in society Assassinate
01:00 generals, ordering troops to attack American citizens. Trump's very well armed and extremist base will try to kill people. People will begin in their minds to censor themselves. They might say, well maybe I shouldn't say this. That's how panicked they are is that the First Amendment is our Achilles. We need a unified mind. That means you're an occult. What did Justice Rideau say last week? There is out there a deliberate undermining of mainstream media. There are the conspiracy theorists, there are the social media drivers who are trying to do everything they can to keep people in their little filter bubbles, to prevent people from actually agreeing on a common set of facts. Does Canada need an internet regulator? The Liberal government thinks so and has introduced Bill C-63 which would do just that! The notion that we're using online harms bill to require the removal of that content
01:55 I think really skates very close to unconstitutionality in terms of the freedom expression protections that we have under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. C-63 would also create a digital safety commission appointed by cabinet able to order removal of content There's also criminal code amendments that create stand-alone hate crime offenses, allowing penalties of up to life in prison. Naming us a social media service lets bureaucrats come into our office and have access to our computers They could decide that the Rebel News is a social media service because you're sending out emails and posting YouTube videos
02:35 Nothing stops the federal government from declaring a church, non-profit, charity and independent media to be covered by this. We've got to ban people's free speech because it is bad... protect democracy. But then she goes on to attack it because no one believes her. Yes or no, do you and Rachel Maddow have evidence of collusion the special counsel didn't have? Well, you know collusion is an interesting term Mr Congressman Collins and it's a term that I'm assuming It's a No You don't have any more information or evidence than we have here Of course
