POWERFUL INTERVIEW! The COVID Crisis is a Weapon of Western Intelligence Designed to Establish Global Government and De-population, Warns Respected Scientist

00:00 Medicine itself, the medical establishment, is a leading cause of death in the world. Okay? So, so-called medical errors and prescriptions and the treatments that are traditional, accepted treatments, are huge killers. So, I, and this is well known, this is recognized, it's recognized in the scientific journals to be the third leading cause of death in the Western world. Now, what I have argued is that that it's structurally made that way medicine the role of medicine as an institution in our society is to maintain the dominance hierarchy is to keep people sick and to put them in their place it's just part of that institutionally these rollouts

00:46 coincide and cause or at least are temporally associated intimately with peaks in all cause mortality and that's for every age group and that's creating peaks in mortality at places in the seasonal cycle where they should never occur and they haven't historically. But all of a sudden you're doing this, you're rolling out these vaccines and you get that mortality. So what we were able to do is we were able to show that this cannot be a coincidence, that it happens over and over again. Wherever you roll out these boosters, you get these peaks or bigger peaks than you should have. And so we're able to quantify on a per dose basis how many people do you kill with these boosters.

01:31 While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Visit InfoWars.com forward slash show and share the link today. We're about to do a deep investigation in the next two hours with Dr. Dennis Rancourt. We'll tell you all about him in a moment, but here is a brief boil down of the findings he and his international team have found that mirrors other major investigative groups around the world using hard data from the death certificates and the death numbers around the planet. We calculate the toxicity of the vaccine

02:07 for all ages and the number allows us, given the number of doses that have been given worldwide, to conclude that 17 million people would have been killed by this vaccine. You can actually see when there's a rollout of a booster, for example, which happens very quickly in time for a given age group, you can actually see immediately following it. a maximum in the all-cause mortality. So an excess mortality actual peak that's temporally associated with that rollout. We see that repeatedly for each rollout. Consistently across all countries? All the countries that have sufficient data where you're able to look at it and you have both the vaccine data and the mortality data, this is what we see.

02:48 When you look at all-cause mortality, you see that deaths are increasing in the winter and decreasing in the summer. And it's the opposite in the southern hemisphere. Their summer is our winter. So in the summer, you should have low death. But during the COVID vaccine campaign, suddenly you see spikes in mortality right after vaccine campaigns. And it's very clear because it's in the summer where you should see a low death period. Especially in the boosters, like for the Southern Hemisphere, you have a peak across the boosters, but it rolls out basically everywhere at the same time around the world. And in the Southern Hemisphere, it's a trough, as Jeremy just explained, so we should have a trough. But then you have an actual winter peak, actual booster peak, and another winter peak. So that's everywhere in all the 17 countries we looked at, where data is good in the Southern Hemisphere, we saw that peak. And something you never saw before. Exactly.

03:44 All right, we're putting his links, his reports out of their studies at RealAlexJones on Twitter and in full wars.com. Get them, spread them. Everything is really going viral now. They did this presentation months ago, but it's just now exploding. Thanks to Brett Weinstein exposing it on Tucker Carlson's broadcast. I know of at least 10 major groups that have had several findings. You've heard them here on the show, medical groups, insurance company groups, stock market groups. that are lived by numbers and some of the best numbers we know are mortality numbers. There's nothing more conclusive than being dead. And so you see the spikes as we just showed beginning right when the shots and boosters happen. And I don't need to be a pathologist to know you shoot somebody in the head with a gun, they fall over and die, the gun did it. Well, now we have the scientists and folks to explain exactly what was in the gun and why it did kill him. So Dennis Rancorp,

04:37 holds a BSc and MSc degrees in physics and PhD in physics from University of Toronto. He was a National Science and Engineering Research Council, NSERC of Canada's international postdoctoral candidate in national science laboratories in France and the Netherlands. He then became a National NSERC University Research Fellow at the NSERC-URF in Canada and a lead researcher and professor at the University of Ottawa for 23 years where he attended the highest academic rank of tenured full professor. He is a interdisciplinary research scientist and has published over 100 articles in peer-reviewed science journals in many different areas of science. He is presently co-director of the research and non-profit Correlation Research in the Public Interest, correlation-canada.org. You'll find him on X at Dennis Rancourt. And again, as I said, correlation-canada.org.

05:35 This is going to go super viral. We already have conservatively 4 million people tuned in right now just on our streams and talk radio, millions more on X. So a lot of folks that followed your work, others haven't. So I think you're the expert on this wherever you want to start. and begin, and over the next hour and 50 minutes, we've got a few breaks to take, but I'm gonna try my best to give you the floor at least in the first hour. Then I've got a lot of things I'd like to point out and questions I'd like to have. But thank you so much, doctor, for joining us and thank you for your work. It's my great pleasure. I really enjoy your work and I've followed you since your early days as a journalist and I really appreciate what you're doing for the world and for people around the world.

06:16 Well, listen, all-cause mortality means just counting deaths, as you mentioned. It is the hardest data you can have, and it's data that nations collect very, very dependably. They actually are interested in counting deaths and knowing who died, when they died, what age they were, and so on. So this is extremely well tabulated. Deaths and births are the best statistics you can get from a nation. or from a state or from a province, any jurisdiction. So we study that data and we've been studying it for a long time. The first paper we wrote describing the features of this kind of data was back on the 2nd of June 2020. So we've been doing this for a long time. We've written over 30 large scientific reports about this kind of stuff.

05:35 This is going to go super viral. We already have conservatively 4 million people tuned in right now just on our streams and talk radio, millions more on X. So a lot of folks that followed your work, others haven't. So I think you're the expert on this wherever you want to start. and begin, and over the next hour and 50 minutes, we've got a few breaks to take, but I'm gonna try my best to give you the floor at least in the first hour. Then I've got a lot of things I'd like to point out and questions I'd like to have. But thank you so much, doctor, for joining us and thank you for your work. It's my great pleasure. I really enjoy your work and I've followed you since your early days as a journalist and I really appreciate what you're doing for the world and for people around the world.

06:16 Well, listen, all-cause mortality means just counting deaths, as you mentioned. It is the hardest data you can have, and it's data that nations collect very, very dependably. They actually are interested in counting deaths and knowing who died, when they died, what age they were, and so on. So this is extremely well tabulated. Deaths and births are the best statistics you can get from a nation. or from a state or from a province, any jurisdiction. So we study that data and we've been studying it for a long time. The first paper we wrote describing the features of this kind of data was back on the 2nd of June 2020. So we've been doing this for a long time. We've written over 30 large scientific reports about this kind of stuff.

07:05 very detailed reports. So basically, all cause mortality is measured as a function of time. So by day, by week, by month, by year, and so on in any jurisdiction that you like that provides the data. And you can do it by sex and by age of the individual and so on as a function of time. And what you see in that data is quite remarkable. You see every phenomenon that can cause death in a society, you directly see it. So you can see, and I've showed this data in my presentations, but you can see large bumps of death in young men when there's a major war like the Second World War. You can see an excess

07:48 a death in men during the Vietnam War in the United States. You can see the Great Depression. You can see the Dust Bowl, these huge economic collapses. These are the kinds of phenomena that you can see in all-cause mortality. It has a seasonal variation. There's always many more deaths in the winter than in the summer. This phenomenon is not completely understood, I would argue. And it's reversed in the southern hemisphere because their summer is during our winter and so on. So the high deaths occur in their winter, so our summer in the southern hemisphere. And we've been measuring this data for more than 100 years now. It's really well-

08:32 displayed by nations and people have been studying it. And so the kinds of things you can see are heat waves, for example, in northern latitude countries, an intense heat wave will kill people for about a week in places that are not used to getting such intense heat waves. An earthquake that crushes people in buildings, you'll see a spike that will occur in one or two days, there'll be all these deaths, extra deaths due to that killing by the earthquake. These are the kinds of phenomena that you can pick up easily in all-cause mortality data. And what's really important is that the CDC claimed pandemics of the past. Dr. Here's a good point for me to interrupt because I forgot to say this to you because we didn't talk before you came on. You sent us your slideshow. So whenever you're ready, you're going to kind of be the host here because I want you to lead this. Whenever you're ready, give them a few seconds. They'll follow with slides when you're ready. So you just call for what you want.

09:31 Well, um, I didn't, I didn't really plan to show them in, in sequence because that would be too much like a, like, like a prep. Well, okay. We can, we can, that's okay. That's okay. We'll try our best to find out of the hundreds of slides, which ones you want when, and we should also add people, people can go to your website and find it all right there as well. Yes, of course. Yes. Uh, well we could show slide six, for example, um, from that, from what I sent you and, um, If that's easy, it'll take a moment, but I would just letting you know the slides are there. Please continue. Okay. Okay. Well, the point is the, the, the main, yeah, slide six is a good illustration of all cause mortality since 1900 in the U S uh, for men and for women together. So you can see the bumps related to war and the great depression and so on. 1918 was a huge event. It's called the Spanish flu, but it shouldn't be called that because I,

10:27 It's now proven scientifically that it was not a viral respiratory disease. In fact, what killed people was bacterial pneumonia. This is before antibiotics were invented at a time when people were just surviving the First World War and were living in horrible conditions with their families and so on. And you know, it wasn't viral. It didn't kill anyone over 50 years of age. It's absolutely only killed young adults and children and so on. And it was all We know from the pathology now, from the preserved lung tissue that was all bacterial pneumonia that was the real killer here. So this was co-opted to be a viral respiratory disease by the CDC and it wasn't that at all. And this is very common. In fact, none of the modern claimed pandemics by the CDC in 1957, 1968 was supposedly an H3N2,

11:23 2009 and so on, none of them give rise to any excess mortality that you can detect whatsoever in any jurisdiction of the world. So whatever they are, these, I would call them pandemics of propaganda, they do not give rise to excess mortality, contrary to all the things that we know does give rise to anomalies and excess mortality. So that's very important. Now, when you study this kind of data, and we can show, let's see, we could I don't know how, what order to put this in. Oh, well, I didn't mean to diverge you off to that. You will just put the slides up as you talk. So go back to your presentation. And I've got a lot of, a lot of questions. The point is you've done the research and you've got the spikes throughout history and we know the mini spikes, earthquakes or heat waves. And then, and then boom, you study this. Then we see the injections and you see historically giant spikes going on.

12:23 Yeah, but not related to any of the claimed pandemics. As far as I can tell from all-cause mortality data that we've been studying extensively for a long time, there's no such thing as a viral respiratory pandemic. Okay, this is really really important in terms of mortality I'm talking about. So it's very important for your listeners to realize that the all-cause mortality data when you study it by state in the United States or by country in Europe or even region of Europe and so on, it contradicts, it disproves the idea that there was a virulent new pathogen that was spreading in the world. There is, it's counter

13:04 evidence to the idea of a spreading new pathogen. There is no such thing that is seen in the all-cause mortality. So we have proven that nothing was spreading. There are hot spots of mortality that occur synchronously around the world that are directly related to assaults against people because of medical treatment and treatment by institutions and care homes and hospitals and so on horrendously horrendous. So every time you assault

13:40 vulnerable people, you kill them. And this is what we see. So you have to realize that the nations that were doing that in the hot spots and the big hospitals where they were doing that, you have these spikes in mortality during the COVID period after the pandemic was announced. And that's the ventilators, that's the redesivir, that's not letting them see their families. And it was all yes exactly you can see was premeditated was the exact same medical policies from Australia to Canada from the US to the UK very very well coordinated It wasn't exactly the same policies there were different ways of assaulting and it did depend on jurisdiction so for example in in in Germany They did not

14:22 overuse high, high doses of HCQ and they did not get a peak of mortality when all the countries around were getting it because of excessive overdoses of HCQ at the very beginning in the first months of the pandemic when they decided it would be a good idea to try that because they were all excited about that there was this new pathogen. There's examples like that. So the nature of the assault is different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but there's a lot of people who use ventilators. Like in northern Italy, it was all about ventilators. They were putting two patients on every ventilator. They found a way to do that. They really did a lot of killing there and so on. So what I'm trying to say is,

15:05 Measures and assaults definitely killed people, but there are many jurisdictions where this was not happening. and there's no excess mortality. So you have to realize there's more than half the countries in the world where there was no excess mortality whatsoever that can be detected until you roll out the vaccines. And then there's a large surge, an uptick of mortality to a domain of higher mortality. So this is true even in India, where you would think that something like this would spread according to the ideas of epidemiology.

15:41 There was no excess mortality in India until they rolled out the vaccines, and they rolled them out three months later than everyone else. And then when they rolled out the vaccines, it caused 3.7 million deaths in India. excess deaths. So there's more than half the countries in the world where they did not do these aggressive assaults and they had no excess mortality whatsoever until you roll out the vaccines. And then you have these large peaks of mortality when you roll out the vaccines. So this is This is happening around the world. Now, the other thing that's important is that there's no expectality in any country anywhere in the world until the pandemic is announced.

16:28 So it's a political act of announcing the pandemic that created hotspots. That is, nothing happened before that. Okay? That's really important. And then specific peaks of mortality happened after the pandemic was announced, often synchronously if they were doing the same kinds of assaults at the same time. So right after the pandemic was announced is a good example. You know, you have to understand that synchronous peaks in mortality around the world in a hemisphere is absolutely impossible if you believe standard epidemiological theory.

17:05 Because when you seed a new infection, it takes time, an unpredictable amount of time before you get a surge in mortality. And because that time depends on all the details of that society and what the details of the seed was and so on. So you cannot get synchronous peaks of mortality from a spreading disease, no matter that there are airplanes flying around, none of the modern conditions change the fact that synchronicity is impossible within the idea of a spreading disease. So my conclusion in all of this is that the spreading diseases have

17:47 never been a threat in themselves to any society in terms of causing mortality. Even the big epidemics and pandemics of the past, like even the Black Plague and so on, are being reanalyzed now by researchers that I'm in contact with in Germany, for example. And it's being understood in terms of huge assaults against the working class or the underclasses or the serfs and the people that were affected by huge societal transformations like a change in regime, a takeover, a collapse in the economy or in agriculture. Sure, if I could just add that, my dad's dad was in the Army Air Corps

18:33 And so before the war, he was flying into Germany bombing them. But then once they went into Italy and into Germany, they said, OK, well, now you're going to be over. He was the boss over a mess hall and a traveling thing to feed troops. And what he said he saw was. And there obviously were some forced labor camps and dead people, but he said mainly, because we know 27 million Germans died, only a third or so died in combat. It was starvation. And because people didn't have food, then a common cold would just kill them. And so that's what you're saying is you have World War I, mass death, sickly people, bad food, a depression, and then we see a spike, just like the Great Depression here. I've seen some university numbers in the US saying 7 million people died of malnutrition during the Great

19:14 I mean, everybody knows that. You don't feed the fish in your fish tank and they're not healthy. They suddenly get some type of bacterial infection, grow stuff on them and die. Because you went out of town for two weeks, didn't feed the fish. You come back, they have an infection, they're dead. I mean, it's real simple. Yes. And, okay, so you talked about nutrition which obviously is very important, but there's another big factor that is extremely important that's studied extensively in the scientific literature and that is the impact of psychological stress and social isolation. Psychological stress and social isolation are known to be the biggest determining factors in terms of depressing your immune system and therefore making you vulnerable to every kind of infection. And so psychological stress, when you lose your job, when the society is being transformed because of war, and so on and so on,

20:09 that has a huge impact on your physiology and it makes you more vulnerable to infections, including children and so on. So that's very, very important, the psychological stress. In fact, I have argued from my social theory studies that we inhabit, we always inhabit as social animals, we inhabit a dominance hierarchy and that dominance hierarchy is maintained by constant aggressions by the dominance and that aggression produces chaotic stress and that stress depresses your immune system to some degree and makes you more vulnerable. So that's why the lower strata, if you like, of society, the underclasses,

20:53 die sooner, they die earlier. That's the biggest determining factor is your social classes, how old you're going to live. And they're sick more often. And this is by design in the sense that this is how dominance hierarchies among animals maintain the dominance hierarchy is they keep the underling sick, if you like. By the way, let me just back you up. Let me just. This is so key and I'm going to shut up. Klaus Schwab in papers he's written in public statements says, we're going to stress the world to get rid of the old system and make a more angrier world. And out of that, we'll collapse the system and build on its ashes our system. And if you look at feudalism, which has been the most common form of government, whether it was in ancient Japan, Europe, the Aztec kingdom, Mesoamerica, the Mayans before them,

21:38 basic mind culture is they kept the general public at near starvation under control. That's why royals throughout history are a couple feet taller in many cases than the little serfs because they've not gotten the nutrition they need. Keeping them poor and starving and only on a tiny piece of land you get executed if you're caught taking one of the king's rabbits or deer, that's done deliberately to keep them down. That's what you're saying. Exactly. You have really dovetailed into exactly my thought here, but it's not primarily, it doesn't have to be primarily nutrition. In a society where nutrition and access to resources is a major effect, then sure. But there can be a society where it's not so much about nutrition,

22:21 But it's more about the actual stress, this random chaotic stress. You know, studies have shown that the stress to keep you in your place is more effective if it's irrational. There's no reason for it. And if it's random, and this has been going on for a long time. This is how you stabilize the dominance hierarchy. And so one of the studies that I rely on a lot was done by a theoretical physicist. And he did a study of what stabilizes society. When do you have a democracy versus a totalitarian system? And this was a theoretical physics paper that has had a big impact on my thinking. And it goes like this. I'll just summarize it very briefly. So what they found in this study that

23:05 that was published recently is that there are two parameters that control the extent to which the society will either run away to totalitarianism or can sustain democracy and a layered structure with class structures and everything for a reasonably long time. And those two parameters are authoritarianism. And what that means in the model is if you are fighting for influence or fighting a battle against someone who's more powerful, who has more social status, If the chance that you, if you will always lose as soon as someone has a little bit more power or status, then that's a very authoritarian system. And if once in a while you can win in court or wherever, then that's less authoritarian. Okay? So that's one parameter. And the other parameter is how violent the society is, which means when you do lose one of these battles for influence and so on, a fight if you like in society,

24:01 Doctor, we gotta break. This is a hard satellite break. I want you to start over because everything you're saying, I'm a lay person, is making perfect sense. Defund the police, create racial division, put women in dresses in the military. It's all meant to stress everyone and break down the old society to bring in the new. You're totally right. Wow. I'm having an epiphany right now. Stay right there. On March 6th, 2001, Alex Jones first predicted the September 11th attack on the World Trade Center. You've got an element of the FBI and these war game scenarios where they can remote control a 747 and they're going to crash it into the World Trade Center.

26:13 They said in Canada, the US, England, the headlines, London Telegraph, you name it. Military secretly terrorized public to follow COVID measures. CIA paid off doctors to not tell the truth about therapeutics and to say that the shots were more deadly. And all these politicians saying it's gonna kill 5 million in the US and 500,000 in the UK to create that fear, then locking people down, putting masks on, massive suicide, massive divorce, Mass giving you bacterial pneumonia. All of this going on and then you look at the destabilization and the admissions. So there's different ways scientifically to look at this, but they admit, Klaus Schwab admits, we are trying to destabilize civilization. Like Yuri Bezmenov, the big KGB defector, talked about the Russian tactic in countries they were trying to exploit. And people say, oh, the Russians did it here. Well, yeah, but

27:07 the Russian system got set up by elites in the US and England. So they were kind of using technologies there to test it out on the Russians because they've been under a czarist system or mainly farmers. They thought these will be easy people to go control. Once they seize Russia, they then use it as an exploitation system worldwide. But Yuri Bezmenov talked about the demoralization phase, destabilizing, turn people against each other, undermining the system. And then they go through the other levels of this And then finally the exploitation phase where they use the captured country to start projecting the power into the next system they're gonna capture. I would use the analogy of a beekeeper, goes in and turns on smoke to confuse the bees and distract them and make them be disoriented and trying to attack the smoke so you can go in and take all the honey. I mean, I think that's probably a good analogy. What do you think, doctor, on that? And then let's continue.

28:02 Okay, well let me first summarize one of the main points that I've been trying to convey up to now. I would put it this way. All-cause mortality and our several years of study, in-depth study, has absolutely convinced us there was no pandemic, in the sense that there was not a particularly virulent new pathogen that was spreading and causing death. That is not what happened. What happened was huge assaults against vulnerable people by many different methods. And every time you did that, you caused excess mortality. In all the countries where they were not doing that, there was absolutely no excess mortality, even if it was a jurisdiction that was right beside the one that was doing this.

28:49 So this so-called virus or the virus would have had to be carrying a passport. It did not cross jurisdictional borders and that is seen over and over again in maps that we have shown. So there were localized moments and points of high deaths directly caused by the huge assaults. So this was excess mortality always produced by attacks against people in various forms, and it's the vulnerable people, especially the elderly, the disabled and so on, who died in the greatest numbers as a direct result of those assaults.

29:26 And the mechanism of the death overall in the US is as follows. We know that social isolation and psychological stress that goes to the heart of your self-image, and this is the kind of impact we were having on people, that depresses your immune system, makes you vulnerable to infection. The most common infections in the US are bacterial pneumonia. In fact, poor people in the United States traditionally get many more prescriptions of antibiotics because they're particularly vulnerable to that. There was a huge recognized epidemic of bacterial pneumonia in the US. The death certificates tell us that. And this was happening because they refused to prescribe antibiotics.

30:16 Antibiotic prescription rates around the Western world dropped by 50% exactly when you needed it most, when people were getting these infections. And so this is the mechanism whereby they died, but it's the assaults that killed them. And so there's a whole variety of assaults. For example, in Peru, they called in 10,000 military reservists to go and find people in the countryside and everywhere and test them for COVID. And if they tested, they would rip them out of their families and isolate them. This killed... There's a huge peak of all-cause mortality in Peru directly related to that policy.

30:54 In the US, the so-called vaccine equity campaigns that went in and got people that way, that directly caused a peak of mortality in the summer when you should never have one in the United States. In the United States, what we found was that excess mortality was highly correlated to poverty in the state. So, in fact, it wasn't only correlated, very, very strong correlation, it was proportional to. So a state that would have had no poor would have not had any excess mortality. So this was a major assault against people and as a result, the most vulnerable were killed.

31:35 and it's a huge number. Now that's before we talk about the vaccines, but you know the vaccines are part of this assault, you're forcing them on people and so on, so you cannot dissociate that what's in the injection And the fact that you're assaulting people in this way and inducing this fear and forcing them to have something injected in their body and so on. Sure. Well, let me just ask this then, because everything you're saying is true. I mean, they fund Black Lives Matter to riot and burn stuff down, billions of dollars and kill a bunch of people. Same stuff goes on in Europe. They defund the police at the same time.

30:54 In the US, the so-called vaccine equity campaigns that went in and got people that way, that directly caused a peak of mortality in the summer when you should never have one in the United States. In the United States, what we found was that excess mortality was highly correlated to poverty in the state. So, in fact, it wasn't only correlated, very, very strong correlation, it was proportional to. So a state that would have had no poor would have not had any excess mortality. So this was a major assault against people and as a result, the most vulnerable were killed.

31:35 and it's a huge number. Now that's before we talk about the vaccines, but you know the vaccines are part of this assault, you're forcing them on people and so on, so you cannot dissociate that what's in the injection And the fact that you're assaulting people in this way and inducing this fear and forcing them to have something injected in their body and so on. Sure. Well, let me just ask this then, because everything you're saying is true. I mean, they fund Black Lives Matter to riot and burn stuff down, billions of dollars and kill a bunch of people. Same stuff goes on in Europe. They defund the police at the same time.

32:12 They block, not just here, it was somewhat coordinated, but therapeutics around the world. They then have police out beating and attacking viciously from New York City to, you name it, horses running over people in Ottawa. Just all of this, this was dystopia. On top of it then, and you show that in your 25 minute presentation that I aired on my show last night that I posted on Friday that, you know, I'm proud of the folks over at Real Alex Jones, got like 3 million views, because this is a war to expose this. But then expanding on that, you then,

32:49 Show the little bump from the stress and it's still a lot of people been dying but little compared to the shots and The mask and the lockdowns and all the social pressure others this deadly virus and all the anxiety But then the shots start that's when you really get those big spikes Yeah, see, I don't agree with the deadly virus. Our work, I think, proves that you cannot believe in a deadly virus that was spreading and that was really causing the problem. So that's just the point that I have to insist on. But what's important here when you talk about the police and so on, you have to realize that the medical industry itself is a much bigger killer than anything the police could do. The third leading cause of death in Western societies is medicine itself.

33:34 is the medical establishment. Well, let me stop you. I want to be 100% clear. I agree with you that the death, because they admitted it was the Randezvir and the ventilators and then just not letting people who just had regular colds or whatever have access, shutting the hospitals down, sending people back home that already had a cold, not giving them treatment, waiting till it got worse. I mean, that was what premeditatedly did that. I was just simply saying, you're right. I'm not a statistician, but it shows the, little hump there from all that and then 2021 comes around and boom we see mass death. Well in the US it was not a little hump, it was very significant. So depending on the jurisdiction and depending on these aggressions, those initial humps before they rolled out were also very large. But let me insist on this, medicine itself, the medical establishment is a leading cause of death in the world, okay?

34:29 So, the so-called medical errors and prescriptions and the treatments that are traditional accepted treatments are huge killers. So, I, and this is well known, this is recognized, it's recognized in the scientific journals to be the third leading cause of death in the Western world. Now, what I have argued is that that It's structurally made that way. The role of medicine as an institution in our society is to maintain the dominance hierarchy, is to keep people sick and to put them in their place. It's just part of that institutionally. So medicine itself is already a big killer. So it's not surprising that a medical military campaign of this type would also kill.

35:16 You see, my point is that we can't forget that medicine itself has huge problems. And I would argue from a social theory perspective that medicine itself, that's its purpose in society. Well, you are definitely right that the more totalitarian a country, the bigger they have a medical tyranny and the tip of the spear for the Soviets and the Nazis and the Chai Koms and everybody else. is medical tyranny, and now the UN has chosen this with their world treaty that takes over everything to establish a planetary dictatorship through medical tyranny. So I don't think that's debatable. That is public knowledge for people that know history. But I would argue that there has been for a long time a medical tyranny in the Western countries, including the United States. No, I agree, but now it's an expansion phase.

36:03 Yes, yes, yes, yes. Definitely it has shown other dimensions that it wasn't asked to play these roles before, but now it's taking a bigger place for sure. So that's important. Now I was explaining this thing about dominance hierarchy. So I want to come back to that because I said that Authoritarianism is this parameter that is a big control thing. So what's the likelihood that you can win a battle against a more powerful opponent? opponent in society. If you can never win, then it's a very authoritarian society. And the violence is, how much do you suffer when you lose one of these battles? So how long do you go to jail for? How big is the fine? That kind of thing. That's how violent the society is. So what's important is those two parameters control how quickly we run away and evolve towards a totalitarian state.

36:57 And the problem is that the elites are always tweaking those parameters to their favor. So they're always changing the laws and having disproportionate influence, non-democratic influence, to change things in their favor. And their favor is a more totalitarian system where they have all the wealth and most of the power and everyone else is underneath. So this is how, this is kind of like the macro look at society. And so Yeah, so that comes straight from theoretical physics, that understanding of the dominance hierarchy. And so we're always, it's a question of degree. To what degree are we truly a democracy where resources and influence are spread in different strata in the society? Or to what degree are we going to become more totalitarian? And we're obviously running in the direction of totalitarianism right now and losing

37:52 every bit of democracy that we had, all the institutions and everything. And it's been a gradual thing. It's taken decades. You have been following it and screaming about it for decades yourself, Alex. I know that. And that's where we're at. And then we decide, they decide that they're going to roll out this vaccine. They're going to have a military campaign and inject everyone. and then multiple injections of everyone. And so we studied to try to find the mortality that was associated to those rollouts. And as you pointed out, we found it. And we found a lot of it. And it was dramatic. That's before the rollouts, the graph you're showing now for the US. If you want to see rollouts, I'm not sure what the best graphs are, but it would be

38:40 Well, we showed examples, you showed examples in the video slide 20 and moving forward would be other examples. But these rollouts coincide and cause or at least are temporally associated intimately with peaks in all-cause mortality. And that's for every age group, and that's creating peaks in mortality at places in the seasonal cycle where they should never occur, and they haven't historically. But all of a sudden you're doing this, you're rolling out these vaccines and you get that mortality. So what we were able to do is we were able to show that this cannot be a coincidence, that it happens over and over again wherever you roll out these boosters, you get these peaks or bigger peaks than you should have.

39:30 And so we're able to quantify on a per dose basis how many people do you kill with these boosters. And what we found was that it increases exponentially with age. And so a key graph that shows that in the presentation there is, for example, slide 23 for Australia and Israel. There it is. And so you can see that the toxicity of the vaccine on the y-axis increases exponentially with the age of the person being injected. And this is data from Israel and also from Australia for the booster dose. So

40:11 We can see this repeatedly. So you have to think of the vaccine as a toxic substance because the more injections you have, the more likelihood that the damage is accumulating and that will kill you more. So the boosters we find are having a bigger effect than the first doses. And just like a toxic substance, the older you are, the more vulnerable you are to dying, to being poisoned in that way. And so you can really understand it that way. And based on all of this study and systematically seeing it virtually in every country where we have enough data that we can find it, we concluded what the average toxicity per dose was on the planet.

40:55 And then from that, given that we know how many doses were delivered, we can calculate how many people would have been killed on the planet, and they would be predominantly older people. And we came up with that number 17 million plus or minus half a million. That's the statistical error on the average. So we believe that a large number of deaths, that many deaths globally can be temporally associated to the rollouts of these vaccines and that all the indicators are, all the scientific criteria for deciding if it's a causal relationship are satisfied. So there appears to be a strong causal relationship between you and Jack and you get these excess deaths. And that's how we did it. And so we have studied more than 100 countries now. We have

41:48 graphs and graphs and by age group and by time of these peaks and what was done. And like I said, when we see an anomaly in a country, we can go in there and say, oh, what were they doing here? So for example, and this is going to shock some people, but in Cuba, they developed their own vaccine and it turned out that their own vaccine is more toxic than the vaccines we were generally using. There's a huge peak of excess mortality that only happens when Cuba rolls out its own vaccine. And so there's all kinds of examples in the data of this kind of phenomenon. There is no doubt in my mind that there is this causal relationship that you can conclude from the criteria scientifically for establishing a causal relationship.

42:40 between the vaccines and death. And some of the critics have said, oh, but those are just COVID deaths. Well, why would you have a peak in COVID deaths precisely when you rolled out the booster everywhere in the world, every time? And then they come up with these crazy theories like, well, they rolled out the boosters when they knew there was new variants coming out, and therefore that would explain it. So you have to start inventing all these scenarios for which there is no concrete data, by the way. These are just invented scenarios. You have to start making excuses like that if you want to start explaining some of the features that we see in the data.

43:24 And Doc, now we're talking to Dr. Dennis Rancourt, who helped lead this international group with such amazing information that pretty much mirrors the other organizations and groups and insurance actuaries and others that have come out and said, look, it's between 17 and 20 something million dead, depending on how you slice it. You've gone with a conservative number here. What did you make? And I'm sure you've seen the fact that the man, Barry Young in New Zealand, that was the only person over all the databases and he had a government database of when they gave somebody a shot, money was apportioned to go to Pfizer. That was the majority of the shots given there. And then he could take the actual death numbers and he could place that over it. And lo and behold, it was almost

44:03 all the people that had taken the shots that were indeed dying. So you can look at death exploding right when shots happen and say, well, that looks like that's the shot. But you get Barry Young's information. And from what he says, the only country where that's been released, they've not criminally charged him. They've not denied that he got the data or was the head guy. How important is his whistleblowing and how important would other whistleblowers be coming forward? That's, I would say it's very important. That's exactly the kind of data you need to go a step further. You need to know the people who died, not only how old they were and where they died, but had they been injected and when had they been injected? How many, what is the time lapse between the last injection they had and their death? You need that data and you need it on a person by person basis. You need to couple those data sets.

44:56 And that's precisely what we need, and that's precisely what governments, national governments, absolutely don't want any researchers to have. And they go to great lengths to prevent us from getting that data. So many scientists have been asking for that data, have been pointing out that this is the data you need to really solve this problem, and you can't get it. So it's a very important movement. to have whistleblowers like that who expose some of that data, even though it's not complete for the whole nation and you can argue that there might be caveats that you have to worry about, still this is precisely the kind of data that one needs to go further.

45:35 and to really see, for example, if some manufacturers are more toxic than others and to see the age variation. I was about to say, because it gets down to certain lots are even worse. We saw that here in the US. And just last week, they announced that Moderna's main plant accidentally didn't control anything and doesn't now know what went in. The headline was unknown substance in their shot. Looks to me like they're trying to cover their ass. Yeah. Overall in our research, the toxic law idea has not played a big role because we're looking at the scale of nations and the world, and we don't see those relatively small effects if there is a bad batch or it wasn't well preserved. And also we studied

46:21 the proposal that there were actual toxic batches, but what we found instead is that those batches had been given at first to more elderly people. We know that the death from the vaccine to more elderly people goes exponentially. So we were able to explain the VARS data, for example, in terms, purely in terms of the age of who was being injected with that batch and how old were they on average and so on. We don't put a lot of weight into this idea that people died from the vaccine because of bad batches. No, the vaccine- I wasn't saying it was bad batches. I was just raising that. I think some of them might've been range finding and testing, but let me ask you this before we go to break, come back in the next hour, looking at this and looking at what's happened now and how they're trying to suppress these numbers, just putting your lay hat on, this is a regular citizen of the world, citizen of Canada,

47:17 Do you think the establishment's happy right now? I see this as a devastating defeat of them. They got a few years of hysteria, they killed a lot of people, they hurt a lot of people, they admit it was a beta test now. Bill Gates has said this, for a larger takeover, they want a global carbon tax, they want carbon lockdowns. They're all admitting that this was the beginning of their new build back better, their great reset. So that's not an opinion, they've said that, but it doesn't seem like it's going well for them and that they kind of jumped the shark. I don't know, I might offer an opposite view, which is this military campaign of injecting everyone in their societies has been a great success. They perfected, they got everyone involved, all the institutions, all the academics, all the media.

48:02 and they had this huge propaganda umbrella and it was a military rollout. And they did succeed in vaccinating everyone, getting everyone to wear masks. They wanted to test to what degree they could actually convince people that it was to let themselves be injected with a substance for God's sakes. And they succeeded. And so it was a successful experiment. They learned a lot from it. I'm sure they'll adjust it, fine-tune it if they want to do it again. But it's amazing the degree to which they succeeded. Now, there's a lot of resistance, and that resistance is clearly worrying them, which is why there's so much censorship.

48:44 and why they go so violently after the organizers and things like that and put them in jail, in Canada anyway. And so they're worried about resistance and they're worried about that. But I think that what's driving this is geopolitics. I think that the US, losing its grip on the US dollar as the world currency and the ability to extract resources in that way, the emergence of Eurasia, China and Russia and so on, these are the big forces that are at play here. And I think that the crazy people who want to keep doing what they do in the United States, the elite, they want

49:30 to make sure that there's no domestic resistance to the wars that they want to have. No, I totally agree. You stay right there. It's an excuse to set up martial law and shut down your political opposition. And it's not your opinion. As you know, the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010 and others, Operation Lockstep, they basically say that. And so that's what this is. This is a cover for martial law by another name. Dr. Dennis Rancourt, very impressive person, correlation-canada.org and you can also find him on X. Dr. Dennis Rancourt, Dennis Rancourt on X. We'll be right back with our number three. We'll talk about how we stopped this because they are getting ready to launch a new one.

51:34 to practice martial law and to make every citizen of every country a suspect in the UN and the big pharma and Bill Gates as the savior. Dr. Dennis Rancourt is a very successful scientist and expert who brought together an international group to break down the numbers that basically concur with many other organizations and groups that have found similar numbers of 17 to 20 plus million killed by the lethal injection. Some stations don't carry this little five minute segment, but we are huge on the internet. Millions tune in right now. We join a bunch of stations in five minutes, but just give me a prelude and also the audience, because we were just talking during the short break. He said, I got a bunch of stuff I want to bring up. Give us a little preview of what you're about to cover.

52:18 Okay, well I want to talk about the degree to which professionals were completely on board with all of this madness, that they completely lost their brains and their professional independence if they ever had it. And I want to show an example of how scientists played into this in relation to the Nobel Prize that was given to the vaccines. So there's a key slide or two that I want to show that illustrates just how insane these professional scientists are prepared to say completely absurd things, and it doesn't matter to them, and it plays into the propaganda. So the degree to which science itself was an instrument of propaganda in this whole thing, and all the professional employees went along with this. So yeah, I want to illustrate that. To start, to start. Yeah.

53:07 We're going to break a moment, we'll come back and I saw those slides, your longer presentation will show that and you'll give us a slide, numbers during the break. What else do you want to then hit? How we get on the offense, how we change this? Sure, I'm happy to go along with you in all those directions after that. And as you say, I'll just give you my opinion. We've covered all the science, I think. I basically stressed how useful and important all-cause mortality is. I talked about, I think what's really vital and what people are just not hearing no matter how many times I say it is,

53:44 spreading diseases are not a big concern in societies and there was no pandemic. So even if they tried to make a virulent bug, they didn't succeed. There's no evidence for it in the mortality. That's a point that I just keep having a hard time telling people about. They won't hear it. They don't want to admit this idea that there might not have been a dangerous pathogen. It's really about the assault. assaults and living conditions and stress, that kills people. Absolutely. I mean, we know just when the stock market crashed in 1929, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but before the food ran out, before all that caused people to have low nutrition and die, we know a lot of millions died in the next decade directly. I think the number I've said was 7 million universities claim. I'm not sure about that. But there were

54:37 tens of thousands of suicides and all sorts of illnesses and problems just stopped the stock market crashing. Right, right. Hey, are we live right now or am I just giving you a preview? We are. No, no, no. Yeah, yeah, what I was explaining is I'm still on talk radio, talk radio still has a lot of audiences. That's why we have these breaks. We're not a, most people watch podcasts. Most people do that. They say, why are there like 10 minutes of breaks an hour? And you know, why does Alex do this? Because we're still on a lot of radio stations. That's how when they do platform me five Five years ago, we were still able to stay on air because we had hundreds of radio stations. Now they got a list of them and threatened them and harassed them. But most of them actually kept us on. Some put us on more because of it. So, yeah, I was simply saying the full audience is not here. We're going to break in like 30 seconds. And I wanted you to just give us a prelude of what you're about to hit when we come back. OK, I see. I see. OK, so we're going to take a five minute break. But instead, I just thought we'd still have a huge Internet audience right now.

55:32 Right, right, right. So yeah, I want to show just how How obscene these scientists can be by a calculation that we did to show that they were talking nonsense, because it's very visual, this graph. I'm going to be talking about slide nine and ten, for example. All right, we're going to break. Back in 60 seconds, I saw you in this presentation. It's extremely powerful. I'm also very familiar with these numbers. Remember, we were told, oh, five million are down in the US, half a million in the UK, and then none of it happened. They were lying. We'll be right back. Oh, by the way, it came from a group funded in, what, Seattle by Bill Gates. So it's the same thing over and over again, and they're gearing up to do it again.

56:11 All right, Dr. Dennis Rancourt has been gracious enough to spend two hours with us and I want to invite him back when he has more findings. We'll do an actual podcast commercial for him, there's no breaks. He can even get up if he wants on a podium and do a presentation to millions of people here because that's what I really want to get from him. But I'm here asking a lot of questions. You can go to his site, correlation-canada.org if you just joined us. his international group of researchers and scientists from the mortality numbers have shown basically what the other researchers around the world are showing, at least a 17 million number of dead people from the shots. And I'm going to ask him after he gets to his next point, why do they just want political control to lock things down? And

56:56 have this medical tyranny than give you an experimental concoction that I know they studied on rats and other animals because I have the FDA's own prediction in October 2000 that it would cause all these things we saw. So, so like, I mean, do they want to be the villains or, I mean, now they're blaming it on COVID. So I guess they had to have something deadly for fear. So it's the shot, which we know it is. I mean, I know we're trying to figure it out. It's just, So reckless, so Dr. Evil, so megalomaniacal. But going back to Dr. Dennis Rancourt, you in your presentation get to how they fear-mongered people into taking the shot with the claim that it was gonna cause all this death, the virus, and then they claim they saved tens of millions of people with it, but we have the actual numbers and it's a giant hoax.

57:46 It is a giant hoax, yeah. Wow, my mind is just blowing up with all these ideas and it's great. And I want to say that I think the military, when they rolled out this technology, they actually believe that it can work. They actually believe that these cationic lipid nanoparticles and what they put in them, that transfection works like the cartoons that they explained that pharma is putting out, that they can actually protect people from a biopoison if they need to. or make people weaker in a certain neighborhood or a certain country. They wanted to have rollouts, military rollouts on a global scale, show that they could do it.

58:27 figure out if they could do it because they believe that this technology can be useful. But our data shows that there wasn't even a pathogen to be concerned about. So its utility is in great question. And I would question whether the thing is, for some reason, the military people think that surely, surely, let me put it this way. It's very useful militarily to be able to inject everyone with whatever you want, whenever you want, to roll it out, to use a pretext and to do that. That is a capacity that you want to have in a world that's going to potentially be insecure and have wars because of the geopolitics and how it's evolving. So they've decided- And by the way, you got interrupted. Finish the geopolitic point. You got interrupted by the end of the hour on how the Western establishment is using this.

59:20 because of crumbling power. They admit they are. And then you're absolutely right. If you own somebody's body, you can put in it what you want with no background, no research. I mean, a man can't make his wife have sex with him when she wants or vice versa. That would be rape too. It's literally rape. I mean, they own our bodies. And so do these control freaks. That's the final frontier of we put what we want, when we want in your body and don't even tell you what the hell it is. So let's go back to the end of the hour. I'm glad you brought up the global strategy to prop up the Anglo-American establishment. And then let's segue into demolishing this Nobel Prize so-called research.

59:58 Okay, so I, geopolitics did not stop being real. Geopolitics is the biggest control wheels on the planet in terms of human societies. And right now, there is a Eurasian bloc that's developing. They have kept their sovereignty. They're developing. Of course they interact. Of course they have economic exchange. Of course there are corrupt individuals that filter into one society and into the other. All that is true. But overall, geopolitics is real.

1:00:34 And this is a geopolitical war for control of the continents that the US wants to continue completely exploiting, namely Latin America and Africa and large parts of Asia and so on. So, and the exploitation mechanism has been the US dollar. Now this is being threatened dramatically. There's actual real economic development happening in Russia, China, and their connected collaborators and so on. So the elite that have been benefiting from this exploitation since 1971, you know, the Bretton Woods Agreement failure and so on,

1:01:12 All of this is real and there's a continuity to it. Globalization, for example, increased dramatically when the Soviet Union dissolved in the early 1990s. You can see all the indicators of globalization and of predation of corporations. They fire up at that year and that's when these international conferences were put on to initiate what the new doctrines or religions were going to be in the West, which was anti-racism of language, gender equity, which meant you wanted to have as many CEO females and members of parliament female as male. It had nothing to do with exploiting children and women. It had nothing to do with human rights.

1:01:57 and also environmental concerns to be used as a religion. So this led to global warming and so on. Those conferences were initiated and were planned and were filtered down into all our institutions in the early 1990s when the Soviet Union dissolved and the West decided, the US decided, this is it. We own everything now. We can design it. One of the threats is domestic resistance. So we can have these new religions. We can make sure that families are not important, and so on and so on. OK, so that's the big picture. So there is now a huge geopolitical struggle

1:02:39 or the US wants complete dominance. It has a hard time accepting that others would have sovereignty and would develop economically. And it's always created and had wars and influences and coups in order to prevent that, but it's not able to prevent it anymore. And Eurasia and BRICS and everything, they're coming together, and that is now unavoidable. So the US is deciding Well, in that case, I think they're desperate and I think they're planning military actions against China. I think they're planning all kinds of things. And what's going to happen now is that the standard of living and the ability to exploit of the US system is going to drop.

1:03:23 And so the elite want to keep all the money, and that means that the working class and the lower class are going to suffer economically dramatically. And therefore, you don't want domestic resistance. You want to be able to keep those people down with propaganda, with lies, and with control, if need be, by direct intervention. So this it's in that view. It's it's to prevent, you know, the yellow vest, the Trump movement, the Brexit. You want to prevent those those social movements that could fight back effectively against an elite that that is a little too crazy. And there's no better way than having a viral scare and a biomedical tyranny where everyone is suspect. Everyone can be disappeared for the greater good. And the children wear masks.

1:04:10 And it's the symbol of you're in the cult instead of a Nazi armband, it's now the mask. What's crazy is you've all know Harari, Bill Gates, the UN, the Carnegie Endowment, the CIA. I mean there's hundreds of news articles where they admitted we're going to use this for social cohesion. They mean their control and the new religion of green and we're going to train you to live in lockdowns and have nothing in the new austerity and that COVID was just the training wheels. I mean they're all over the place. And Alex, in the same way that you see a rollout of vaccine and you immediately see in time an excess peak in mortality, in the same way what's happening geopolitically is not disconnected

1:04:53 from this whole vaccine rollout, COVID scare, the masks and everything. The social engineering assault that just happened is not disconnected from the geopolitical reality. Really big things are happening geopolitically. There's a war in Ukraine and the US has been exposed as being not so powerful militarily. They're losing. The entire West is supporting Ukraine and they're losing. unambiguously. Okay, so they're being exposed. Also, military technology has changed. Drones are now very important. A small country with little resources can take down an aircraft carrier with drones, send out hundreds or thousands of drones and take down incredible ships. So the US can no longer just send in

1:05:46 a carrier group and completely intimidate a nation. So military technology, the real development of Eurasia, all these things are devastating the complete dominance that the US-centered system had. And the US-centered system, a lot of them are flipping out because they know there's going to be social unrest. They know that their economy is going to come down a notch, and they want the working and non-working classes to suffer from that, and the elite want to keep everything they have and even have more. I think that's what's going on here.

1:06:24 By the way, they admitted it. On screen, military campaign to influence public opinion, continued after defense chiefs shut it down. For those who don't know, when we say the military ran this, the Western governments got together, had all these so-called experimental shots, mRNA, gene therapy on the shelf. And Gates and Fauci had C-SPAN forums in 2017, 18 saying, we don't like the approval process anymore. I've played these clips many times. We're gonna use a novel virus probably out of China soon to blow up the old regulatory system. And we're gonna have fast made new technologies that we call vaccines. We just give to you and we're gonna have a global response to deliver it. So it gives them the global control. It's a unifying way to have the world go back under

1:07:11 What they tried for World War I, the League of Nations, and for World War II, the UN, which is a creature of the Anglo-American British US global empire, and that's what it is. And so they've done a big viral scare with the UN they control to try to get the world back under their control as they basically hold the planet hostage. with the quote threat of new viruses. But what they really mean is new shots they're going to use. But then there's the problem, the Russians and others won't take the shots so they're not dying. So they can only sit here and kill their own population, which again, as any empire begins to die, it begins to at least try to control what's inside the empire.

1:07:49 Yes, and Russia and China did have their own vaccines and that's because if you see a new technology being put out this way that potentially can be of use to you, you're going to put it out as well. But they're going to make their own, of course. And so that's not an accident either. If someone develops something, including the ability to engineer society, then you're going to do it too. And also, we cannot ignore that U.S. propaganda is extremely powerful and does penetrate into Russia and China to a large degree. So the populations there would have been frightened by this

1:08:30 this virus. But the important thing is all of the deaths and all of the turmoil and all of the economic impact would have happened exactly the same way if you just imagine that there's no particularly virulent new pathogen, none whatsoever. Forget about lab leaks, forget about anything. If you just admit that it, let's admit the possibility that there was no new pathogen then all the deaths would happen the same way if you do this to people, if you assault them in this way. I think that's really important. And so, I mean, earlier you said they thought they'd be saviors. I mean, if I wanted medical control of the world,

1:09:13 I'd have to be a sugar shot up front so people wouldn't get hurt and they would buy into me being a savior. I wouldn't give them something so dangerous. And I know, I know in the studies when they tested very similar systems at the University of Texas and a bunch of other facilities, there were scandals because it killed Most of the lab rats and things like that over time cut their life expectancy in half. I can play a clip of just a one minute of the Texas Senate. In this case, it could not be a sugar shot or a saline solution because it works better if there's adverse effects. It convinces people that this is real.

1:09:48 if there are adverse effects. And it allows them to think in terms of, well, yeah, there is a risk, but it's for the greater good and there's more risk from COVID itself. So it's why- Dr. Rancourt, I agree with you. Earlier you said, I'm not disagreeing with you. I know we're war gaming this. Yeah. You said you thought the military actually thought they would be the saviors. I think certainly they thought when they helped create it and do it, and they were given this, but the higher up group of others... No, no, no, no. I think you may have misunderstood or I didn't explain myself well. I don't mean that the military thought they were the saviors. I mean, they think that See, I think they're thinking in terms of a bioweapon produced by another country and they want to inject the antidote quickly into their population. They need to be able to roll it out quickly. You see, that's what I meant. I don't agree with that. The vaccine. Yeah, I didn't. I didn't. That's yeah. So what I mean is, but there's no doubt. There's no doubt. I mean, here's an example. Why would the FDA put out on their own website in October

1:10:44 2000, three months before the shot rolls out, that we think is going to cause heart attacks, myocarditis, blood clots, infertility, turbo cancers. Why would they put that out? Because then I had all these other scientists on and like Dr. Michael Yeed on and all the rest saying, no, no, there's been other studies with similar shots. It's going to do this. So at the same time, they're on my show saying it, the FDA puts out a document basically agreeing, what is the point of that? It, it, it, it, it, you cover yourself. It works better if you agree. If you don't want to have a bunch of people screaming and showing patients dying and so on, and you haven't foreseen it. So it's a lot easier for them to say we foresaw it. These are adverse effects, but it's for the greater good. And COVID is more dangerous than all these adverse effects. And that brings us to where you were earlier.

1:11:36 You got to rip the last hour. Now let's get into the fake science claiming it saved 14 million lives. All right. So if I could have slide nine, and then I'll show slide 10 and maybe 11 and 12 after that as well. But if we could have that, I'll show you what we're doing here. OK, so in this slide, so there was this scientific article by Watson et al. that said that the vaccines had saved millions of lives. I forget what they said, 14 million or something like that. A huge number of lives globally. And so we took that paper apart and we looked at it and they said how many lives were saved in every single country they calculated. And we show that their calculation is complete nonsense because in the blue curve there, this is for Canada, but the blue curve is the all-cause mortality.

1:10:44 2000, three months before the shot rolls out, that we think is going to cause heart attacks, myocarditis, blood clots, infertility, turbo cancers. Why would they put that out? Because then I had all these other scientists on and like Dr. Michael Yeed on and all the rest saying, no, no, there's been other studies with similar shots. It's going to do this. So at the same time, they're on my show saying it, the FDA puts out a document basically agreeing, what is the point of that? It, it, it, it, it, you cover yourself. It works better if you agree. If you don't want to have a bunch of people screaming and showing patients dying and so on, and you haven't foreseen it. So it's a lot easier for them to say we foresaw it. These are adverse effects, but it's for the greater good. And COVID is more dangerous than all these adverse effects. And that brings us to where you were earlier.

1:11:36 You got to rip the last hour. Now let's get into the fake science claiming it saved 14 million lives. All right. So if I could have slide nine, and then I'll show slide 10 and maybe 11 and 12 after that as well. But if we could have that, I'll show you what we're doing here. OK, so in this slide, so there was this scientific article by Watson et al. that said that the vaccines had saved millions of lives. I forget what they said, 14 million or something like that. A huge number of lives globally. And so we took that paper apart and we looked at it and they said how many lives were saved in every single country they calculated. And we show that their calculation is complete nonsense because in the blue curve there, this is for Canada, but the blue curve is the all-cause mortality.

1:12:34 The red curve is the mortality that, according to them, would have occurred if they didn't deploy the vaccine. And the gray curve is the cumulative doses of vaccine coming out. You see that? So they're saying that if we hadn't rolled out the vaccines, that you'd have that red curve. In other words, you'd have mortality like we've never seen historically. And look at this, it magically would have occurred precisely when you rolled out the vaccine. So in other words, they rolled out the vaccine exactly when and in proportion to the deaths that they say would have occurred without the vaccine. And those deaths are completely obscenely unreasonable. It's just impossible to have that death level. In fact, even with

1:13:22 the excess mortality that did happen with COVID, you see that blue line underneath. And then they say, and the vaccine brought the mortality down to that level, not halfway, not partway, but down precisely to that level. So we're completely ridiculing that paper that was published that argued that the vaccines had saved this many lives. And we show country after country what it would look like. And so if you go to the next slide, which is slide 10, again for Canada, now instead of plotting all-cause mortality itself, we're plotting excess all-cause mortality. So you see that before the pandemic was announced, it's just a flat line. Then you have a little bump immediately after the pandemic was announced when they were killing people directly in response with what they were doing in care homes and hospitals.

1:14:11 This is this unheard of excess mortality in red that would have happened on this exactly in line with when the boosters and the vaccines were given out. But in fact, what we see and we've shown this before is that every time you have an extra rollout, you actually do get an excess mortality peak occurring. But they were they were talking about this magical Modeling that that explained that the magical Vaccine had saved all these lives. It's just crazy nonsense So we show that that paper was just that kind of sure but what about this doctor? I don't know we have the slides, but I've covered this a hundred times anybody were out there remembers this they said in 2020

1:14:59 even within three or four months of it starting, oh my God, we're going to have hundreds of millions dead. We're going to have 5 million dead in the US, half million in the next few months in the UK. Long before the shots start, that never happened. So right there to me, that seems like the biggest baloney. And then it came out of what? The British coordinator and then his original data came out of a British government group. And then also they used some data out of a Bill Gates funded group, if I remember correctly. Yeah, if you unpack that article, it's just complete nonsense. It's just the assumptions are incorrect. How they set it up, I mean, they set it up to get that answer. And it's just garbage. It's garbage science. It's part of the propaganda. That's all it is. Well, what about this big lie that

1:15:50 And I understand you're saying the whole thing was basically made up to begin with, but they said, Rachel Maddow, Joe Biden, you take the shot, you can't get COVID, you can't spread it. Then we take the shot and the deaths go off the chart. And people like, well, I know idiots that have taken it five, six times and they're sick all the time. And then I'm like, but aren't you protected? I mean, the whole thing's a lie. Yes, and once once the individual has bought into it and has agreed to be injected and has bought into the propaganda They're not gonna start denying that the story was wasn't true right that's human psychology. So listen, I'm not like that I agree most people in their con do not want to admit they've been conned. I've had a couple friends who

1:16:33 and a couple business associates, remember the old Nigerian scam emails where they, you know, I'm Prince Boo Boo, you get a million dollars, you give me 5,000. And when they give them the 5,000, I go, listen, that's a scam. Now they're going to say he needs 10,000, but you're getting 5 million. And they, to a person, get mad at me and say, you're mad, my ship has come in. And then when they get ripped off, for hundreds of thousands of dollars in one case of someone I know, they'll never talk to me again because I told them they were being scammed. They're not mad at Prince of Boo Boo and the scam. I don't understand Stockholm syndrome because if I'm a prisoner, I may play along, but I'm not under their control. So I don't get the psychology of you're abused and you won't admit you were abused because when I, when I've been scammed, I admit I've been scammed and I get pissed off. Yes.

1:17:23 Yeah, it's a personality thing. I'm the same way. But this is it. We live in a dominance hierarchy and this is the dominant psychology, individual psychology that is consistent with that dominance hierarchy. An animal species is more competitive, survives more if They structure their societies in a dominance hierarchy, but those dominance hierarchies can be pathological. Sometimes the dominance go too far. Even in a troop of monkeys, if the dominant monkey beats up one of the members too viciously,

1:18:01 They can go too far and then the others will gang up on them and send them away or beat them up and so on. So you can have excesses. And in human societies, it's more complex, but it's essentially the same thing. I was talking about those parameters, authoritarianism and violence of the society in terms of these interactions between individuals. you can allow those parameters to go to places where you're getting into excesses and it's the excesses that make people react. So if the perception of something that is completely unfair, unjust, like somebody gets killed for no reason or beat up viciously for no reason and so on. So the aggression has to be paid off. Hold on, you're so over the target here. We gotta take this break. Ribbiting, doctor, stay there. I wanna come back and talk more about this.

1:20:40 starts killing its own people for no reason or demanding the children be sacrificed as just an exercise of total control. And doctor, what would you call that in history? Just insanity by the ruling class or what is that? I guess that those are the periods of meltdown when you when you've been in a totalitarian system for too long And there's no pushback, there's no balancing forces or anything. Eventually you'll have some kind of a meltdown like that, I guess. And it will... Often though, before there is such a meltdown, there'll be a competing system that, you know, is taking your territory. There'll be wars and things like that.

1:21:19 Generally speaking, I think that systems that are not completely totalitarian are stronger, where the individuals can be contributing with their creativity, with their work, they're individually motivated. Those are stronger societies generally. So there is an advantage to having a more democratic system in terms of competitiveness, inventing new technologies and so on. But then there's an advantage to a more totalitarian system as well because you can direct all of the forces in one direction and so on. So these battles have been happening throughout the ages and every human society has been a dominance hierarchy but its structure and the degree to which

1:22:05 and how the mechanisms it uses, the institutions it uses are different. So I don't see the classic theories of political science, Marxism, capitalism, even anarchism, I don't see them as fundamentally different. They're all just variations to stabilize a dominance hierarchy. And they populate dominance hierarchies. So that's a point. But you know, before I forget, I want to say two things to your readers. Please find my essay entitled, There Was No Pandemic. It's published in a book. It's online. You can find it. There Was No Pandemic. Because that in one spot, in one short essay, I conclusively explain what that means and all the implications of it.

1:22:55 And the other thing I'd like your readers to look at is a short video I did that's called Realities of Health, where I explain the interplay between dominance hierarchy and the medical establishment and the health system and individual health and how that all fits together and works. So those are two things I wanted not to forget to say. But what I was talking about just now is that to maintain a dominance hierarchy, you have to have aggression. the dominants have to aggress the others to keep them in their place and to put them in their place and to establish what their place is. And that aggression is in all societies, and that aggression is most effective in keeping people in their place if it is irrational.

1:23:42 makes no sense at all, random, you don't expect it. And it's known from animal studies that that's the kind of dominance aggression that's most effective. But at the same time, you risk going too far. You risk having excesses. And those excess risks being perceived as fundamental injustices within the dominance hierarchy. And that's when you can see the revolution that way. Huge injustices that are seen, for example, someone gets beat up by the police in the street for no apparent reason, and there can be riots in the streets for months.

1:24:20 those are real catalytic events for pushback. So you've got this constant interplay between there will be aggression by the system against people, but sometimes it goes too far and it can be perceived as unfair. And then there's potential for pushback. So that's part of the... Absolutely, and smart elites Don't don't don't become so transparent look at all the indictments of Trump and the persecution of Trump supporters and The FBI saying white people are the number one criminals. Well, everybody knows that's not true This has really woken the public up But why is the third Biden administration of the the Obama administration? That's what it is. Why are they then doing things that so classically? Illuminate them as tyrants

1:25:17 Yeah, there is the US is a special system because you've got these two different groups of influential financiers and so on. I think I think I think traditionally the Republicans have been tied more to industry, energy industry, military industry, whereas Democrats more recently have been tied more to the finance sector and financial exploitation and and and and it's at war now with the energy sector. It's taking an hour. Right, right, exactly. And so that competition has become very vicious in the United States and they're willing to use dirty tricks even at the risk of destabilizing the whole society and destructuring it and destroying the institutions and democracy and everything. They're so vicious and they're so greedy that they're willing to go there.

1:26:05 The energy sector has played a big role and is now being, as you say, attacked and put in its place. And I think global warming is part of that as well. So the US is special in that there's basically, what do you call it, a domestic war between these two factions. And they're using propaganda, and they're using social engineering, and they're using censorship. It's just so vicious. And it's a terrible thing because the US is the main force on the planet right now. And for it to be disintegrating in this way makes it dangerous for everyone. So that's another factor there. No, I totally agree. I mean, if the leftist ruling BlackRock class would just leave people alone and stop trying to cut our sons generals off and do this, they could still be running the empire. But they're picking a fight with the infrastructure itself

1:27:06 What's the word from Greek where it's not civil war, but it's internal warfare. What's that term? I'm trying to think of the word. But I mean, yes, this is, and even if they're successful suppressing the American people, that will kill whatever's left of the engine of the country and give them a Pyrrhic victory. Yes. And you know, the empire cannot run on financial exploitation globally. That's just not going to happen. You need a real military power. You need an industrial base. You need these things. But you can't run an empire without them. And I think the US is going to be shocked to see that the whole thing falls apart very, very quickly. Now, Russia

1:27:52 is very explicit about its plans and how it's structuring its society and how it organizes things they're very communicative in that regard and you can really see that they believe the opposite they believe in actual ability to have a domestic economy. They want diplomacy. They want development for people. They're trying to boost families and make strong family units. They're supporting the traditional belief systems. They are trying to structure society so that it does not melt down. Well, Putin made a national directive six years ago, I agree, that they'd be the biggest exporter of organic food. I mean, energy, food, families, that's actually a civilization.

1:28:36 Yeah, yeah. So they're succeeding, I think, and China's succeeding as well. And the US is, you know, risking becoming a shell. The establishment's committing seppuku. Is that the word? Suicide in Japanese, yeah. Yeah, yeah. Well, you're a fascinating guy. Everybody tuned in to hear about the 17 million dead, which is a number we've seen from other groups and other statisticians and other people breaking it down on the low end. But I hope you're wrong. I mean, I hope they're not. I mean, you said earlier it was a success, their rollout, but it's a sign of their weakness to try something like this for control. And I see the exponential awakening happening. I disagree with you.

1:29:20 Overall, I think humanity has turned the corner. I think we're winning by like three percentage points. I'd say 53, 47, but we've not been ahead in a long time. I'm very optimistic. Well, one of the most promising things that could happen is elections, the electoral systems are still in place in Europe and the US and that could help to turn things around. Now in the US, unfortunately, even if Trump gets elected, the administrative power is greater than the presidential power. So he's going to have a hard time. But in some of the European countries, if you have different governments really coming in, they can transform

1:30:02 and redirect their nation. And so elections are potentially very interesting in that regard. And so I would put a lot of faith into politics and getting involved in politics and trying to play a role there. What about cutting the head off the snake? I don't mean killing people like they've done to us. What if governments around the world, I know like places, a bunch of places, have opened criminal investigations in Eastern Europe, in Ireland, all over the place into the poison shots. It's pretty open and shut. It's experimental. Sure, there's blanket immunity, but there's not immunity for murder. Bayer knowingly put out millions of doses of Factor VIII that gave people HIV and hepatitis and all the rest of it. I mean, what?

1:30:47 I think the courts are completely, not completely, but almost completely, virtually completely bought out. They work for powerful interests and that's been very, very clear in a lot of the litigation that we've seen. So that's a real problem. I don't think they're going to save us. You know what I think is really going to save us, Alex? I think the thing that is most likely to change our lives and to really start saving us, and it's going to take a decade or two for sure, is the development of Eurasia. In other words, real competition. Eurasia is now already attracting professionals and scientists and thinkers and people with talents and people with business knowledge. They're becoming an attractor. The brain drain is shifting and it's turning in the other direction. And they will eventually be seen as a place where there's actual economic freedom and actual ability to influence society and participate in a democracy.

1:31:48 So I think that's going to happen more and more. And as that happens, the US is probably going to have to realize that it needs to come back to its way of doing things, which is to have a strong domestic economy, to actually compete, to rely on its inventiveness, and to have an educational system that actually works, not the garbage that they've now put us into with the educational system. They need to be able to train actual engineers and scientists and business people and military people and give them a really high level proper training, not just become spokespeople for wokeness and crap like that. No, I agree. But I mean, that's like if you look at the Western globalist empire, its symbol should be a snake eating itself.

1:32:33 a snake eating its tail because they want a dumbed down population they can control, but then that blows back into all the intelligentsia, destabilizes things, and then that makes them weaker themselves. But they're thinking very, very short term. I mean, take the defense secretary. The defense secretary- We don't have an administrative class anymore in the US of people who think and plan in terms of the stability of the society, protecting democracy, being the balancing force against the elite that have taken way too much power. They've written all the laws. They basically have transformed the country and bought out everyone in all the places. So there's no longer a management class that looks out and protects the democracy itself and people itself. They've destroyed it.

1:33:25 And so that's what you need in order to- We don't have an aristocracy, we have a kleptocracy. Yes, yes. And so just to give you an example, in Canada, when you became a civil servant decades ago, I know because my friends were doing this, you had to swear that you would protect the interests of people, that you were going to serve the public. You have to swear to that. They removed that completely. Now it's a stakeholder. Now you're going to serve the ESG. Exactly. It's all about stakeholders now. So there has been, they've really crippled

1:32:33 a snake eating its tail because they want a dumbed down population they can control, but then that blows back into all the intelligentsia, destabilizes things, and then that makes them weaker themselves. But they're thinking very, very short term. I mean, take the defense secretary. The defense secretary- We don't have an administrative class anymore in the US of people who think and plan in terms of the stability of the society, protecting democracy, being the balancing force against the elite that have taken way too much power. They've written all the laws. They basically have transformed the country and bought out everyone in all the places. So there's no longer a management class that looks out and protects the democracy itself and people itself. They've destroyed it.

1:33:25 And so that's what you need in order to- We don't have an aristocracy, we have a kleptocracy. Yes, yes. And so just to give you an example, in Canada, when you became a civil servant decades ago, I know because my friends were doing this, you had to swear that you would protect the interests of people, that you were going to serve the public. You have to swear to that. They removed that completely. Now it's a stakeholder. Now you're going to serve the ESG. Exactly. It's all about stakeholders now. So there has been, they've really crippled

1:34:02 the institutions that could stabilize the democracy. They've crippled them and they thought that they can just do everything with propaganda and with nice new doctrines like anti-racism of language and things like that. And it's not true. The world doesn't become better just because now half of the vicious CEOs are women or half of the bought out politicians are women. It doesn't make the world a better place. So those are lies. So that's where we're at. We're in a really bad place right now in the Western world. I have a lot of faith in Eastern Bloc European countries. I was just in Romania recently. It's amazing that they're able to resist more.

1:34:49 and they have stronger politics, they have stronger involvement of people and institutions to stabilize the nation. So, there might... And they're at the border with Eurasia, you see. So, some good things might come from there and they might be followed. Their example might be followed by Western Europe. And but exactly because they're not as domesticated as us. And again, I don't mean that merely about Americans or Westerners. We've had it good so long. We've not been through World War two up close like they were or the Soviet Union or all the Islamic invasions that have happened. And so they have to know their grandma and grandpa. And they know like we're a people. We have to be a people or we're weak. They at least still have that basic identity.

1:35:34 and its identity and culture that is going to, like you said, the real wheels of the world are geopolitics. It is the peoples, it is the cultures. That is our wealth, it is the diversity. The left says, oh, in the name of diversity, get rid of all diversity and make everyone subscribe to some globalist homogenized new religion. But no, it's going to be that. And so I talked to Tucker Carlson, he's over there all the time. A lot of other folks, I've been invited over to Eastern Europe, I've never been there, I've been to Europe but not Eastern Europe. I need to get to Eastern Europe because they tell me that's the Renaissance. Also, look how Buccale in just two years totally turned El Salvador around. It shows with real leadership, that captures the people's attention and gets the culture to believe in themselves and not through totalitarianism but through leadership, it just turns around. We can do incredible things.

1:36:24 Well, one of the reasons Latin American countries are so resilient is because they've been constantly attacked and cooed and militarily attacked by the US for decades and decades. So you have to organize, you have to survive, you have to have a gray market and a black market and have communities and family and everything. Otherwise, you're dead. So that's one of the reasons. But the US is the heart of the empire. And they have been very oppressive and they have really indoctrinated the professionals and the population. And now Americans are getting to experience the totalitarianism that we projected worldwide. Yes, they are. Yes, they are. Yeah. Yeah. What does it mean, doctor, when an empire turns inward? I mean, don't empires usually die when they turn inward on their own people? That's a difficult historical analysis to make.

1:37:18 That's why I think that the influence of the rest of the world is going to help America see that it can do better and do differently. I think the working class in America is the class, the social class that can most is most able to save America. If political movements can tie into that and be inspired by it and be guided by it morally and otherwise, you could rebuild the US. It's going to be a very difficult task. Canadians like myself and Europeans are looking at the US and thinking, oh my God, it's imploding the whole thing. What are they going to do? They become dangerous when they become that fragile. It becomes dangerous because you might decide that the solutions are military, right?

1:38:07 So, yeah. Well, I know they're telling people, officers of the military, that we're going to war with Russia. And just a few years ago, they're like, oh, we can't do that. Even Biden, that's World War III. And now Sean Penn's like, we can have a nuclear war. It's, that guy doesn't know how to wipe his ass or load a rifle. And he's up there talking about nuclear doctrine. I mean, it's just, it's madness is what it is. And then Lloyd Austin was missing for five days. Now he's still in the hospital. Didn't tell anyone. He's really in control of the nuclear football. I mean, this is dangerous. It's very dangerous. The US is a dangerous elephant in a China shop. We're all afraid of what's going to happen and what their next moves are going to be. Thankfully, Ukraine has been under control. And it's horrible what they did to Ukraine. What I mean, what the West did to Ukraine. Heavy stabilization.

1:39:05 to the people and to the system and to everything. To have that coup in 2014 and then to militarize it to that extent as a weapon against Russia and force Russia to intervene in this way for their own survival is, you know, I would have done the same thing if I was leading Russia. I would have said, okay, we can't negotiate, they won't negotiate. They're just arming this place and turning it into- I mean, I know it's true. When NATO is bringing in tens of millions of weapons and pushing Russians and it's founding, that's where Russia was founded, out, I mean, what would the US do if Canada suddenly was under NATO and trying to invade or the Russians did it? I mean, it would be instant war. And whether you like Putin or not, I think NATO got a little freaked out by what actually happened. I mean, I think they're realizing now that they're playing with fire.

1:40:00 Oh, they're realizing that Russia, at least on the territory in a traditional war, is extremely powerful and extremely competent and has the society behind it and the industrial complex behind it and a strong economy. And they're not going to break Russia with this war in Ukraine. Absolutely not. So I think they learned a good lesson there. And they're still learning it. If they could only learn it more quickly, that would be good. So that's interesting. And they've been exposed. I mean, Yemen has exposed that the US can't even keep a seaway open, you know?

1:40:42 All of the shipping avoids that area now. Well, it's just like Vietnam. Again, now Vietnam is one of our biggest trading partners, a capitalist society. Ho Chi Minh wanted that deal to begin with, but the military industrial complex said, no, we're just going to have a war with you. He's like, we'll be capitalists, just give us a business deal. And they went, nope, we're just going to have a war, you're a commie. And then, of course, the Vietnamese said, we're not giving up, so it didn't matter. you know, how much power we had. If people don't give up, you can't beat them. Very, very sad. I hope we can save our country. Dr. Dennis Rancourt, very impressive. Correlation-Canada.org. We'll talk to you soon. Thank you. OK, it's a pleasure being here. Powerful two hour interview. While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Visit InfoWars.com forward slash show and support the InfoWars.