47:33 In Texas, the judge would turn the internet feed off and the cameras would all immediately turn it off, where she would spend hours lecturing my lawyer that he couldn't speak. People said his lawyer's an idiot. Why is he defending? Because it's a damages hearing where they're having their own trial, but then we can't defend because we're quote, guilty, the judges say. So Robert Barnes is an expert. He's worked on this case. He's an independent analyst. Doesn't work for him for wars or for me at this time. He's able to lay this out. He's been doing live streaming with literally over a million viewers yesterday with his co-host, another lawyer out of Canada laying this out. We got a bunch of clips, but just. Lay out what's really happening here because this is unprecedented. This judge is sending it all out where she spends hours telling my lawyer, you can't ask questions about this. You can't ask questions about that. They say their opening statement. We want to shut him down and take him off air. He says, well, I want to ask these people that are, you know, this FBI agent never said his name. I want to ask, did you talk about taking Alan Saufer? Nope. You can't ask that question. It's incredible. Explain what's happening.
48:32 Yes. So Viva Frye and I covered it live yesterday on Rumble. Aviva is covering it again today. I'll be in and out covering it throughout the week. And this if people want to see a snapshot of this case the best snapshot of it is yesterday and Viva and I's coverage of it. And because here's why, if you had the big lie of this case is that Alex Jones defaulted by not participating in discovery. Well, that lie is exposed as a big lie by the plaintiff's own arguments and the plaintiff's own evidence, which detail all of the financial information that they are incorrectly stating throughout the case. They had all the evidence. So that was always a lie. Second part, they admit their whole goal, their whole objective in this trial, supposedly a trial just about damages.
49:17 But they didn't even begin to discuss anything concerning the plaintiffs until almost two-thirds of the way through opening statement. Instead, their whole thing was bashing Alex Jones. And what did they say to the jury in opening statement? They said that the case is about stopping Alex Jones, preventing Alex Jones from ever having a platform again, ever having a speakerphone again, ever being there to end the press rights of Alex Jones, to end the press rights of InfoWars, to end the speech rights of Alex Jones, to end the speech rights of InfoWars. They said so explicitly and expressly as they said that's what the case was all about. And they said that's what justice is. So and so to Norm Pattis credit. Norm if you want to see what good defense advocacy looks like against a rogue judge.
50:04 In a hostile setting, there is no better example than Norm Pattis' representations yesterday. And I recommended watching that video in this part of the trial to people all across the country, even if they're not interested in this case particularly. Because how do you stand up to a judge? Norm Pattis showed how you do so. You don't capitulate to rogue judges. This judge couldn't even control her temper, so you got to see a snapshot of that. You got to see how one-sided the case is, because the judge would sustain objections from the plaintiffs where the plaintiffs didn't even identify what their grounds of objection were. That's how bad it was. I mean, literally. Well, also, Chris Maddy, the former federal prosecutor, Democrat Party operative,
50:45 He said, let's take Alex Jones off the air and then Pattis tries to ask the question of the FBI agent never said his name and ask, you know, you want to take Alex Jones off the air and the judge shuts it down and says, you can't ask that question. And Maddie gets up and says, nobody's saying take him off the air. We have that clip. I mean, the level of this BS is insane. Oh, exactly. And what's the one name that is all about what led to this case that this judge says can't be mentioned, can't be asked about, can't be talked about, can't discuss it in opening statement, can't discuss it in direct examination, can't discuss it in cross-examination. She ran national TV ads of edited tape of me questioning Sandy Hook, which is my right. And I don't apologize for questioning it. I apologize if out of context I hurt somebody's feelings.
51:26 She literally says you will not bring that up, but she ran 30 million dollars worth of ads in the closing months of the campaign 2016. In fact, as Norm Pattis explained, this whole case came about because of Hillary Clinton. And yet Hillary Clinton is the one name that can't be talked about, can't ask questions about her, can't mention her in an opening statement, can't reference her to the jury. But she tells Norm he can't talk about anything. She told him yesterday, you've got to say your client's guilty. I found him guilty. Yeah, no, not only that, was already saying that she's going to try to potentially put you in prison or hold you in contempt. Yeah, she said, I can't wait till he's here to hold him in contempt. What was that? Yeah, it's about, this is a liberal authoritarian power mad approach.
52:05 And then that, she comes from the liberal Republican wing of Connecticut, the Bushite wing of Connecticut. And what you're seeing is a judge who couldn't even control her own temper. If a judge is supposed to do one thing, at least control your temper. She couldn't even control her temper because she was so enraged she couldn't bully Norm Pattison to forfeiting rights. And so all of it--. By the way, the word is now, they may not even let me talk. Like, I cannot respond in any way. I'm just supposed to sit there and let them bully me. Knowing that you have a case supposed to be about damages and yet almost none of the evidence presented has anything to do with damages. And they're looking at their lead witness for all these people. Look, the media has covered everybody except their lead plaintiff in the case. Who's the lead plaintiff that was the first witness who testified? It was not a parent of anybody who died. It's not a sibling of anybody who died.
52:56 at Sandy Hook. It's an FBI lawyer, an FBI lawyer. He's the one who's their lead number one plaintiff. And Robert, what they're doing is setting the precedent where the garbage man, I never said his name, I questioned something he can sue me. This is bureaucrats setting the precedent to sue people that disagree with them. Well, it's beyond that. This is the deep state's attempt to establish a basis that if you question the deep state, if you question the FBI, if you question the Justice Department, if you question the CIA, if you question any government official what they did, even if you don't talk about them, he admitted on the stand you had never talked about him.
53:34 ever. He had never even, in fact he doesn't talk about a single thing he heard you specifically say that supposedly bothered him. And again, under Connecticut and Texas law, you argued this in the case earlier, when you were on the case, you can't say somebody didn't say their name. Since you mentioned it, don't believe us folks, see it for yourself, here it is. Santiago's stuff, those were the calls that you were told about, correct? Where your fellow agents... Santiago's calls, Halbig's calls, and there were multiple. Oh, Halbig called you too? Halbig called the FBI. I didn't speak to him. Okay. How many times did Jones call you? He didn't call me, sir. Did you ever see this photograph 289 on InfoWars? I didn't. No, sir. Do you know whether he ever talked about you on InfoWars? I don't. I don't know. If Halbig appears as a guest on a talk show, does that make him affiliated with the talk show?
54:27 To me it does. So if I appear on CNN tonight, I'm the CNN affiliate? Yes you are. Okay. Sustained. You're gonna give me a sidebar? Certainly. And she, when they had the sidebar, she threatened to hold him in contempt for just asking the guy, did he ever say your damn name? I don't know who this guy is, Robert. Exactly, he admitted that he never saw or heard anything from you or Infowars about him ever, ever. And yet he is being allowed to sue for tens of millions of dollars. So think about this, folks. This means every FBI agent, every US Justice Department official, every CIA official, every State Department official, if you question anything the government did, not just what they did, what the government did- That's what they tried in Virginia. Remember?
55:16 In the Charlottesville case, this is establishing the precedent that the government officials can now sue you into oblivion if you question their narrative. They are a new protected class. Never say their name, never talk about them, don't know who he is and he wants $10 million. And here's a high-ranking, well-regarded FBI counsel, right? That's who this guy is. This isn't some low-level schmuck. This is—and he is their lead, number one plaintiff testifying witness. That tells you what this case is really all about. This case is not about Sandy Hook. This case is not even really about the parents and the families, or they would have been the first witness up.
55:56 for these lawyers. Instead, it's an FBI lawyer who admits you never even talked about him, you never even mentioned him, you never even referenced him. You didn't know who he was until he sued me. Exactly. And so this is the goal and to Norm Paddis' credit, he finished opening statement very well. What Norm said is, first Alex Jones, who's next? That's what the case is about. Take out Alex Jones, then you can take out anybody else if you question or challenge the government's narrative with the government officials themselves being the ones suing, even if you never even talked about them ever.
56:35 Stay there. We'll talk more about the case. I've got dozens of clips. We've got to do a special show or maybe tomorrow again on these. There's more today. I mean, this is just crazy. And the judge reportedly is now telling my lawyers, well, we're going to admonish Jones and tell him the few things he can say, and I'll be admonished. And if I say the wrong thing, I'll be put in jail. If I say I'm innocent, I'll be put in jail. I am innocent. Gonna fly. Free bird. Oh yeah! Ha ha ha! I'm right where I want to be in a fight with the new world order. Listen, listeners. You want somebody to take on the globalists? You want somebody that's fearless? I don't even see that as a good point in my life, but I am fearless. My dad was known as Brave Dave, the stuff he did, and I just can't help it, I don't have fear. The only fear I got is the fear of failure, ladies and gentlemen.