Topic: Verizon

The government’s campaign against Mike Lindell reportedly included Verizon banning MyPillow’s text marketing and the FBI seizing Lindell’s cell phone at a Hardee’s drive-thru. Despite these pressures, Lindell has announced his run for Governor of Minnesota, promising to "clean up the fraud" in the state’s welfare and election systems. He maintains that his business resilience is an asset that will help him "secure the American dream" for his constituents.

Recent service outages at Verizon and technical issues on the X platform are being characterized as probing attacks and tests for a future large-scale cyber attack. These events are allegedly part of a globalist strategy to release viruses, cause economic collapse, and stage false flag operations. Reports from Axios are cited to suggest that political planners intend to use violent protesters as victims to manipulate public perception.

There are warnings of a potential "false flag" event at the southern border as the left focuses public attention on the unrest in Minnesota. Recent technical probes on Verizon and X are cited as indicators of a coming cyber attack or domestic emergency. Observers are encouraged to prepare for disruptions by securing electronics in Faraday bags and remaining vigilant.

Software developers analyze Section 5 of S-686, noting that it covers the entire "internet backbone," including ISPs like Verizon and satellite systems like Starlink. The bill's language is so broad that it encompasses future technologies such as post-quantum cryptography and synthetic biology. Experts conclude that the bill is designed to retroactively legalize prior government surveillance crimes while ending free speech on the internet.

The January 6th Committee is accused of conducting illegal "fishing expeditions" by subpoenaing 19 months of private data from AT&T and Verizon for citizens not charged with crimes. This practice is compared to the British Crown's general warrants, which the U.S. Bill of Rights was designed to prevent. Ali Alexander maintains that his phone records will not contradict his testimony but that the seizure itself is unconstitutional.