Topic: State Sanctioned

General Michael Flynn and Roger Stone express frustration over the lack of deep state prosecutions 156 days into the Trump administration. Stone mentions a case involving a New York bank allegedly funneling $90 million to Iran in violation of sanctions. He questions why Pam Bondi and Kash Patel have not yet pulled the trigger on high-level indictments.

The hosts discuss the "ritual" of being targeted by George Soros or lawfare as a sign of authenticity. They express support for Elon Musk despite his critics, noting that he is facing similar legal attacks. Liz Churchill comments on the failure of mainstream media to report on vaccine injuries and the 2020 election, asserting that the establishment must "take out the head commanders" of the information war.

State Department spokesman Matt Miller defended the Biden administration's policy of allowing Iran access to funds for humanitarian purposes, such as food and medicine. Critics argue that money is fungible and that providing any financial relief to the Iranian regime indirectly funds destabilizing activities and terrorism. The segment dismisses the State Department's assurances as deceptive.

Joel Skousen attributes the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage to the Western deep state rather than Russia. He argues the move was designed to foreclose the growing sentiment in Germany to lift sanctions against Russia as winter approached. By destroying the physical infrastructure, the globalists ensured that Germany remains committed to the conflict regardless of the domestic energy hardships faced by its citizens.

Roger Stone joins the program to argue that the Ukraine conflict was entirely avoidable and would not have occurred under Donald Trump. Stone claims the Biden administration actively avoided a diplomatic solution because war is profitable for the "deep state." He dismisses the effectiveness of economic sanctions, noting that Biden's energy policies have actually propped up the Russian petroleum industry.

The practice of "de-banking" individuals like Mike Lindell is described as the domestic version of international economic sanctions. Dr. Darren Beatty explains that the national security community views populism as a threat similar to foreign adversaries like Russia or China. This shift toward labeling political disagreements as national security threats is characterized as the end of free speech in a "sub-democratic" era.