Topic: Shrapnel

The discussion focuses on the technical nature of the "Mother of Satan" bomb, noting its history of high lethality in overseas attacks. Jake Lang praises the NYPD for their professionalism compared to Minneapolis police but calls for former military personnel, such as Green Berets, to act as counter-operatives in future protests. He argues that Christians must show "dominance" on the streets to counteract Islamic public prayer displays.

A caller discusses his upbringing in a Masonic family and the breaking of oaths within secret societies. The motive behind the Las Vegas Cybertruck bombing is questioned, with suggestions that the use of fireworks and gasoline indicates a desire to send a message rather than cause mass casualties. Additionally, a reported fireworks explosion in Hawaii on New Year's Eve is highlighted as a potential overlooked terror event involving shrapnel and blast injuries.

The FBI Deputy Director clarified in Senate testimony that there is "absolutely no doubt" Donald Trump was struck in the ear by a bullet fired by Thomas Matthew Crooks. This statement follows controversial remarks by FBI Director Christopher Wray, who had previously speculated that the injury might have been caused by shrapnel. The agency now officially maintains that a bullet was the sole cause of the wound.

The host disputes claims by FBI Director Christopher Wray that Donald Trump might have been hit by shrapnel rather than a bullet. Using HD video analysis, the host argues that a 5.56mm round grazed Trump's ear, explaining that cartilage does not "blow off" unless a direct hit occurs on bone. A comparison is made to shooting at prickly pear cacti, where a grazing shot leaves a clean nick similar to the wound seen on Trump's ear.

World-record-holding sniper Dallas Alexander joins the show to analyze the ballistics of the Trump assassination attempt. Alexander dismisses the FBI's shrapnel theory, stating that a bullet hitting bleachers 50 feet behind Trump would not send shrapnel forward to hit his ear. He concludes that the narrative is a deliberate attempt to downplay the reality of the assassination attempt.