Topic: Quo Warranto

The legal concept of "Quo Warranto" (by what authority) is presented as a tool for citizens to challenge officials who lack valid oaths. Todd Callender claims that even January 6th judges and the U.S. Attorney for D.C. have defective oaths, making their prosecutions unlawful. He encourages citizens to ask local sheriffs and officials for their oaths and to treat those without them as individuals impersonating public officers.

Mike Lindell introduces MyStore.com, a new marketplace for American entrepreneurs to bypass "cancel culture" and big-box retailers. He outlines a legal strategy involving a "quo warranto" petition to the Supreme Court, which he believes will result in a 9-0 decision to vacate the 2020 election results. Lindell emphasizes that public pressure and massive viewership of his symposium are essential to forcing the court to act.

The discussion turns to the Arizona audit and the refusal of officials to turn over election routers. Lindell explains his plan to file a "quo warranto" lawsuit with the Supreme Court following his symposium. Alex Jones credits Lindell's work with helping to defeat the HR1 election federalization bill.

Mike Lindell announces a massive cyber symposium for July, where he will invite "white hat hackers" and cyber experts to validate his packet capture evidence on live television. He intends to file a "Quo Warranto" petition with the Supreme Court to challenge the legitimacy of the current administration. Lindell warns that the same voting machines are being used to facilitate a global transition to communism across multiple countries.