Topic: Pcr Cycles

Thomas Renz argues that mass PCR testing is being pushed to create a fraudulent "case count" for bird flu, similar to the tactics used during COVID-19. He reminds listeners that officials have admitted social distancing was "made up out of thin air" and that masks were ineffective. Renz asserts that the federal government and Big Pharma have lost all credibility due to repeated lies, comparing current operations to historical scandals like MKUltra and the Gulf of Tonkin.

Mike Adams, who runs an ISO-accredited lab, discusses how law enforcement laboratories have been caught faking results for drug convictions. He and Eric Coppolino critique the use of high cycle thresholds in PCR testing, arguing it creates "signal" out of background noise. They suggest that many DNA-based criminal convictions may be based on fraudulent molecular science.

Jody O'Malley criticized the use of PCR tests for diagnosis, noting that high cycle thresholds (up to 51 at her facility) lead to false positives. She argued that the narrative of asymptomatic transmission is unscientific and used to drive fear. O'Malley warned that current hospital protocols, including the use of ventilators, are often more dangerous than the virus itself, which has a 99.7% survival rate for most people.

A caller named James from Michigan describes suffering from a blood clot in his kidney and herpes-like sores after being around vaccinated co-workers, which the host attributes to "vaccine shedding." The segment discusses alleged risks to pregnant women and changes in menstrual cycles for those near vaccinated individuals. The host mentions taking aspirin daily to counter potential blood clotting issues.

John Rappaport explains how Florida Governor Ron DeSantis successfully fought lockdowns by exposing the high cycle thresholds used in PCR testing. By requiring labs to report the number of cycles, DeSantis was able to reduce false positive rates and justify reopening the state. Other governors are encouraged to adopt this strategy to fend off federal pressure and CDC mandates.

The sensitivity of PCR tests is manipulated by increasing cycle counts to 35 or 40, which Chris Sky claims creates a high rate of false positives. He argues that even after vaccination, the government will continue to mandate masks and social distancing. Sky warns that the process is a perpetual cycle designed to make the population dependent on government subsidies.

Jon Rappaport cites Anthony Fauci's admission that PCR tests run at 35 cycles or higher are "useless," yet the FDA and CDC recommend up to 40 cycles. A New York Times article from August 2020 is referenced, which stated that up to 90% of positive tests could be false positives. Rappaport claims this high cycle count is a deliberate crime to inflate case numbers.

Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida issued a mandate requiring labs to report the cycle thresholds used in PCR tests to expose potential fraud. Jon Rappaport notes that no large-scale study has ever proven the PCR test can accurately determine if a person is sick. He argues that the lack of validation for the test makes it a tool for political control rather than public health.

A caller who wrote a thesis on HIV in 1991 compares Fauci's current playbook to the handling of the AIDS crisis. The discussion explains how high PCR cycle counts create false positives and suggests the vaccine could act as a "binary weapon." Jones claims that the vaccine makes people ultra-sensitive to future coronaviruses, potentially leading to mass deaths.