Topic: Marcus Childress

Pete Santilli reports an imminent mass filing on behalf of January 6th defendants, citing egregious Sixth Amendment and due process violations. The case draws parallels to the 1991 Oliver North appeal, where convictions were overturned because congressional testimony tainted the jury pool. Attorney Marcus Childress is specifically accused of doctoring video evidence to create false impressions during the public hearings.

Pete Santilli accuses House investigative counsel Marcus Childress of legal malpractice for allegedly framing Alex Jones and Stuart Rhodes during the hearings. Santilli argues that Childress used out-of-context clips from November to imply Jones was incited by a December tweet from Donald Trump. He calls for Jones and others to file state bar complaints against Childress for "deceiving the public" and violating legal ethics.