Topic: Legal Ethics

The discussion explores the practice of "forum shopping," where lawyers seek out favorable jurisdictions for their cases. Tom Renz and the host discuss the difference between ethical filing and the use of "rigged" courts where activist judges allegedly manipulate evidentiary records to prevent successful appeals. They argue that some district courts create "trash" factual records that are nearly impossible to overturn in the appellate process.

The judge provides a history of the crime-fraud exception, noting it did not exist when he was in law school. He explains that if a client uses a lawyer's advice to commit a crime, the privilege is waived. In Trump's case, four federal judges ruled that his communications with his lawyers were not privileged because they were allegedly used to perpetrate a fraud on the grand jury.

Judge Joe Brown continues his analysis of the Trump indictments, labeling them as malicious prosecution and ethical lapses by Alvin Bragg. He shares an anecdote about an incompetent District Attorney in Shelby County who did not know the location of the criminal justice center upon his appointment. Brown laments the trend of placing unqualified individuals in high legal positions.

Judge Napolitano concludes his segment by reiterating that leaking the indictment is a violation of legal ethics. He explains that the five-year statute of limitations for the alleged campaign finance crime has likely run, but the government will argue it was "tolled" while Trump was out of the state. Stone and Napolitano agree that the prosecution is a "naked partisan attack" designed to manipulate the Republican primary.

Dr. Michael Yeadon discusses his involvement in providing affidavits for international court cases aimed at prosecuting officials for pandemic-related crimes. He posits that severe respiratory disease pandemics are biologically impossible because symptomatic individuals naturally withdraw from circulation, limiting spread. The segment concludes with a call to engage local leaders, such as sheriffs and mayors, to resist future pandemic drills and mandates.

Boyle criticizes modern medical education for failing to teach the Nuremberg Code, noting that many doctors today are unaware of the ethical standards established after World War II. He mentions that California has specifically adopted the Nuremberg Code into its state law. He encourages individuals to find local lawyers to use his notice as a basis for a legal defense against mandates.