Topic: January 6th Committee

Reports suggest that Liz Cheney and the January 6th Committee are destroying documents as the Trump administration prepares to take office. Geiser compares these actions to retreating forces in historical conflicts attempting to hide evidence of wrongdoing. Additionally, the segment covers allegations that the Biden administration is escalating toward World War III and selling off border wall materials to facilitate illegal immigration.

The January 6th Committee is accused of destroying documents to prevent the incoming administration from uncovering the truth about their investigation. Geiser claims the committee was a staged production involving Hollywood producers designed to provide Jack Smith with a pretext to charge Donald Trump. The segment looks forward to a "great American renewal" focused on government transparency.

Alex Jones accuses Congressman Adam Schiff of committing treason by using government funds to frame a U.S. president through fake dossiers. Jones recounts his own experience testifying before the January 6th committee, where he invoked the Fifth Amendment 98 times to avoid a "star chamber" setup. He claims Merrick Garland ultimately declined to indict him for January 6th because the evidence showed Jones was attempting to prevent people from entering the Capitol.

CNN is criticized for a segment claiming that describing the United States as a republic rather than a democracy is dangerous. Legal updates include the Justice Department's decision not to prosecute Attorney General Merrick Garland for contempt of Congress, contrasted with the impending imprisonment of Steve Bannon. Additionally, J.D. Vance is identified as a favorite for Donald Trump's vice-presidential pick in recent GOP polling.

New evidence suggests that Liz Cheney and the January 6th Committee suppressed testimony that contradicted star witness Cassidy Hutchinson. Roger Stone denies Hutchinson's claims that he spoke with Mark Meadows on January 5th, labeling the testimony as coached perjury. The segment calls for a House Republican investigation into the destruction of committee records.

Former Trump aides Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro faced criminal contempt of Congress charges for defying subpoenas from the January 6th Committee. Navarro was convicted by a jury, while Bannon was prosecuted for withholding information relevant to the probe. The segment contrasts these prosecutions with Hunter Biden's refusal to sit for a closed-door deposition, which Republicans argue constitutes similar contempt.

In a sit-down interview, Tarek Johnson explains he wore a MAGA hat as a tool for "self-preservation and de-escalation" while attempting to rescue trapped officers. He expresses shock that the January 6th Committee never called him to testify despite his prominent role in the day's radio transmissions. Johnson characterizes the official narrative as a "pat tale of good versus evil" designed to expand government power.

Infowars begins a simulcast with Steve Bannon's "War Room," focusing on the defeat of Elaine Luria in Virginia. Luria, a member of the January 6th Committee, is trailing the Republican challenger by double digits. Bannon and his guests argue that this result proves the American people do not care about the January 6th narrative and are focused on other issues.

A simulcast with Steve Bannon's War Room highlights the defeat of Democrat Elaine Luria, a member of the January 6th Committee, by Republican Jen Kiggins in Virginia. Bannon argues that Luria's focus on the January 6th investigation alienated voters who were more concerned with domestic economic issues.

The January 6th Committee is criticized for refusing to televise Donald Trump's potential testimony, with claims they intend to leak only selective portions. In a separate political development, Democrats are accused of leaking the sexual assault records of GOP candidate Jennifer Ruth Green, a black female veteran. These tactics are described as desperate measures by an unpopular establishment facing a potential midterm sweep.

Owen Shroyer fills in for Alex Jones, describing the current state of America as a "dark day" following the sentencing of Steve Bannon to four months in prison. Shroyer characterizes the January 6th committee as a sham and claims the country is facing a disaster without divine intervention. He previews upcoming guests including Norm Pattis and Mike Adams while expressing outrage over the current news cycle.

Breaking news arrives that the January 6th committee has subpoenaed Donald Trump for all communications, including Signal messages. Shroyer and Adams compare this to the treatment of Alex Jones, predicting the committee will find Trump in contempt regardless of his compliance. They contrast this with the lack of prosecution for Eric Holder or Hillary Clinton.

Roger Stone joins the program to discuss the January 6th Committee's decision to subpoena Donald Trump and the ongoing allegations against himself. Stone argues that the committee is using falsified video evidence and guilt by association to distract from issues like inflation and open borders. He maintains his innocence, stating he renounced violence and was not present at the Capitol during the riot.

Congressman Jamie Raskin confirmed the January 6th Committee is reviewing evidence to investigate the plan to destabilize the 2020 election, including reported access to Alex Jones' text messages. Jones disputes the committee's claims, stating they only have a limited tranche of raw texts rather than his entire phone. The committee is also scheduled to meet with Pennsylvania gubernatorial candidate Doug Mastriano.

The segment reviews media coverage regarding the January 6th Committee's interest in Alex Jones's text messages. Oliver Darcy reports that while the messages may not cover the day of the riot, they could help investigators map a "web of contacts" within the Trump orbit. Jones mocks the idea that mainstream Republicans are "sweating" the potential leak of these communications.

Attorney Robert Barnes criticizes the legal conduct in the Alex Jones trial, alleging that the plaintiff's lawyer violated professional ethics by exploiting accidentally sent information. Barnes argues that the January 6th Committee is misusing its power by seeking access to these private records, violating Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights. He and Jones also discuss the presence of high-end movie cameras in the courtroom, suggesting the trial is being treated as a theatrical production for media outlets like HBO.

The charges against Steve Bannon are analyzed, with Barnes arguing that the January 6th committee lacks a valid "legislative purpose" for its investigation. He explains that Bannon relied on executive privilege and the advice of counsel in his refusal to testify. Barnes asserts that Congress is usurping executive and judicial powers by acting as an investigatory body rather than a legislative one.

Former Navy SEAL Matt Bracken returns to the show to clarify comments played by the January 6th committee, asserting they were taken out of context from a broader discussion on war games. He criticizes the current administration for sabotaging the U.S. military through mandatory mRNA injections and "sexual confusion" policies that are driving out conservative warriors. Bracken also apologizes for previously misjudging Oath Keepers founder Stuart Rhodes, who remains in solitary confinement in what Bracken calls an "American Gulag."

Alex Jones addresses the January 6th committee's focus on the term "1776," which mainstream media outlets like CNN and MSNBC label as a code for violence. Jones argues that the term represents the Declaration of Independence and a peaceful rejection of tyranny. He contrasts the treatment of January 6th protesters with the lack of prosecution for civil unrest caused by Democrats.

Judge Joe Brown joins the program to discuss the "lawless" reaction of New York officials to the Supreme Court's Second Amendment ruling. He criticizes the January 6th Committee as a "clown show" and expresses outrage over the push for gender-reassignment surgeries for minors. Brown argues that if a child needs parental consent for life-saving surgery, they should not be allowed to undergo permanent elective procedures like genital removal.