Topic: Indemnity

Donna Pokere-Phillips provides a legal opinion that Pfizer's indemnity is null and void if it was obtained through fraud. She questions whether New Zealand's water assets were used as collateral in the vaccine contracts. The segment concludes with a call for New Zealanders to support the Outdoors and Freedom Party in the upcoming October election to challenge the "cesspit of corruption" in Parliament.

A discussion on maternal health reveals that stillbirth rates allegedly did not rise during the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak but increased after the vaccine rollout. The segment explains that Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) products provide pharmaceutical companies with total legal indemnity. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics is cited to show a sharp rise in disability claims starting in May 2021.

Pfizer reportedly demanded that the governments of Argentina and Brazil provide military bases, bank reserves, and embassy buildings as collateral against future vaccine damage lawsuits. The company sought total immunity from liability for negligence, fraud, or malice. While the U.S. PREP Act provides this immunity automatically, other nations resisted these "magnum opus" demands of Big Pharma.

Pfizer reportedly demanded sovereign assets, including military bases and bank reserves, as collateral from the governments of Argentina and Brazil during vaccine negotiations. The company sought total immunity from civil liability, including cases of negligence or fraud. While the U.S. PREP Act provides such immunity, other nations resisted these demands for indemnity against potential vaccine damages.