Topic: Checks

A woman named Brenda Jones is caught on tape admitting to taking advantage of the vulnerability of homeless people for the voter fraud scheme. James O'Keefe reveals he has copies of checks written from the "bosses" to the coordinators of the operation. He plans to release the identities of those at the top of the funding chain early next week.

The host addresses a recent disagreement with Candace Owens regarding an investigation into Charlie Kirk. After fact-checking claims about an Egyptian plane, the host was labeled a traitor by Owens' surrogates. The segment emphasizes the importance of accuracy over emotional narratives and mentions that even reliable guests like Kyle Serafin can occasionally be misled by figures like Kash Patel.

A story regarding "Egyptian planes" promoted by Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson is dismissed as a debunked diversion. Evidence provided by Daily Wire editor Cabot Phillips, including geolocated photos and receipts, was reportedly rejected by Owens' supporters as "fake metadata." The discussion highlights the difficulty of debating individuals who reject all forms of rational evidence and alibis.

Jones reiterates that the information put forward by Candace Owens regarding Egyptian planes and the Fort Huachuca meeting has been debunked. He expresses sadness that his critics believe he should "read the crowd" and support popular theories rather than the truth. He invites Owens to come on the show to defend her claims but notes that her surrogates have been "nasty and deceptive."

Alex Jones claims he was once offered a $50 million annual salary by a top DC law firm to become a "fact-checker" for the establishment. He asserts that globalist power is concentrated in tax-free foundations like Rockefeller and Carnegie, which use the CIA as a clearinghouse for their interests. Brand and Jones discuss how the elite assess influencers to determine if they can be bought or if they must be destroyed through "lawfare."

The FBI issued an alert regarding a legal loophole that allows individuals on certain visas to purchase firearms if they possess a hunting license. While these buyers undergo standard background checks, federal authorities expressed concern that radicalized individuals could exploit this mechanism to plot attacks.

Elon Musk and the DOGE team have initiated a "pulse check" by emailing federal employees and asking for five bullet points describing their weekly accomplishments. This move has caused a "total meltdown" among Democratic operatives and senators like Tina Smith. The email is defended as a basic management tool to identify "fake employees" and "lazy" workers within the federal bureaucracy.

A parody video created with AI depicts a fictional assault on an OpenAI data center targeting Sam Altman. Jones clarifies that the video is satirical and not a real event. He also addresses a "fact check" regarding a viral video of Al Pacino, explaining it was a dramatic edit using a speech from the movie *Any Given Sunday* and was not intended to be deceptive.

The CEO of Axios is criticized for a "meltdown" regarding Elon Musk's assertion that citizens are now the media. The host mocks legacy media figures like Joe Scarborough and Al Sharpton, calling them "mercenary liars" with dwindling audiences. The segment frames the decentralization of information as a revolution larger than the invention of the Gutenberg printing press.

Senator Markwayne Mullin publicly dismantled the "Russian asset" allegations against Tulsi Gabbard, noting her status as a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army. Mullin argued that if Gabbard were compromised, she would be unable to pass background checks or command her reserve unit. He suggested the attacks are politically motivated by her decision to leave the Democratic Party.

Judge Joe Brown discusses the legal implications of California's law banning voter ID requirements, arguing it makes the state's electoral college count unreliable. He provides a historical overview of the Electoral College as a system of checks and balances designed to prevent large population centers from dominating the rest of the country. Brown warns that the Democratic Party is attempting to dismantle these protections by attacking the filibuster.

Hedge fund manager Bill Ackman discusses the loss of public confidence in traditional media on the X platform. Ackman admits he was previously misled by the media regarding Trump’s "very fine people" comment in Charlottesville. He praises citizen journalism and unscripted podcasts for allowing the public to hear candidates without deceptive editing.

A Maha Alliance advertisement deconstructs the "very fine people" media narrative regarding Donald Trump's 2017 comments on Charlottesville. The ad highlights that Trump explicitly condemned neo-Nazis and white nationalists just 50 seconds after the widely circulated clip. This case study is used to argue that mainstream media outlets use redirection and omission to deceive the American public.

Elon Musk funded a series of ads through the Maha Alliance to expose media corruption and historical "redirection" tactics. One specific ad highlights the 2017 Charlottesville "very fine people" quote, arguing that the media suppressed Donald Trump’s immediate condemnation of neo-Nazis for seven years. The campaign aims to hold news networks accountable for deceptive broadcasting regarding the border crisis and the Constitution.

Alex Stein suggests that Donald Trump should pander more to low-information voters by highlighting the $1,200 stimulus checks issued during his presidency. He argues that Trump needs to use "rules for radicals" to compete with the Democrats' promises of free services. Owen Shroyer counters that the "hard right" makes it difficult for Trump to pander without facing internal backlash.

Kamala Harris allegedly misrepresented her past support for banning fracking and mandatory gun buybacks during the Philadelphia debate. Critics point to multiple video clips from previous years where she explicitly called for these bans, contradicting her current moderate stance. The ABC moderators are accused of biased fact-checking by failing to correct Harris while repeatedly interrupting Donald Trump.

The host discusses the "Fourth Turning" and a global awakening where the public increasingly recognizes the "cancer" of the establishment. He mocks corporate media fact-checkers for attempting to sanitize the records of figures like Kamala Harris and Chuck Schumer. The segment emphasizes that the "intelligentsia" in high-rise apartments are disconnected from the reality of the producers and builders in the "red" parts of the country.

An analysis of historical cycles suggests that the current political conflict could lead to a "scientific fascism" that replaces the modern liberal order. The discussion warns that even a counter-purge against the current establishment could result in a new form of totalitarianism. Comparisons are drawn to the fall of the Roman Republic and the rise of emperors, suggesting that the destruction of checks and balances leads to innovation being replaced by conquest.

A compilation of alleged media hoaxes is presented, including the 2017 incident where CNN reportedly edited footage of Trump feeding koi fish in Japan. Other examples include false reports about Trump's Thanksgiving activities and the use of Italian hospital footage to represent New York during the pandemic.

Chase Geiser joins the discussion to compare the current political climate to the American Revolutionary War, noting that the Founding Fathers could not have anticipated modern surveillance technology. Geiser argues that the intelligence community has become an unchecked fourth branch of government. The conversation focuses on the need for new legislative checks and balances to be implemented following a perceived populist victory.