Topic: Call Of Duty

The law firm Koskoff & Koskoff is accused of using funds from gun control foundations to target free speech in the video game industry, specifically naming Call of Duty. The segment links these legal actions to the same network of Connecticut lawyers and politicians who sued Remington and InfoWars. Jones characterizes the legal strategy as a "ghoulish" attempt to blame media for the actions of school shooters.

An Army veteran suggests that modern video games like Call of Duty serve as predictive programming for a future military intervention in Mexico. He notes that Republican senators are increasingly calling for an invasion to combat the fentanyl crisis. The segment warns parents to keep children away from games that may be conditioning them for societal destruction.

Prosecutor Thomas Binger attempts to link Kyle Rittenhouse's use of a rifle to playing violent video games like "Call of Duty." The judge intervenes, calling the line of questioning a "grave constitutional violation" regarding the defendant's right to remain silent. Jones mocks Binger as a "cocky peacock" and a "Soros rat" who is attempting to provoke a mistrial because the case is failing.