2:32:38 this alleged variant virus to others. Now I have to beg the question, what exactly does a vaccine accomplish if it does not prevent transmission of the illness? Now, if we go to the next slide. This is the page on the CDC website where they actually talk about what a variant is so they define it and they give a classification system and the classification system is actually based on the potential health threat rather than you know
2:33:14 the Greek letters as we have come to know. And interestingly, they don't even follow their own definitions about what classification to put for a particular variant. However in this article it doesn't actually discuss how how they determined that there is a variant in the first place. And it also doesn't directly discuss how they determine the clinical characteristics of such a variant, so you have to look to the reference sections and dig a little bit deeper now it does say in a footnote that the variants are determined by the in silica
2:33:56 in silico genome sequence. So we know that at least has been confirmed, but you know after the break I'm going to talk about the crazy method that they use to ascertain any clinical information about these variants because as you know these variants don't actually exist so they can't actually take the variant out of a sample purify it and and study it. So what exactly do they do? I'll tell you that it will completely astonish you, the lengths that they go to make up pseudoscientific information in order to create the fear that will get us to go along with whatever they say. Hello and welcome back to The Alex Jones Show! I'm your host Dr Andrew Kaufman coming to live from Central New York
2:34:51 Before the break we were speaking about the lie that is the Delta variant and I was going over the CDC's explanation for how they learn information about the clinical presentation and behavior of these variants. And if we could have the next slide, I want to highlight that since they cannot actually get these viruses from nature because they don't actually exist, they go to the great length of synthesizing what they call a pseudo virus. Now this is a laboratory creation that they essentially make, a fake version of the virus in order to conduct research because they can't get the real virus. And so you can see in this article
2:35:42 that is on the slide, this describes the procedure that was referenced by the CDC. So we created VSV, that is another fake virus based SARS-78 Cov2 pseudoviruses that contain each of the individual mutations as well as one with all eight mutations of the B.1.1.7 variant or the UK Delta 8 and etc. Now that B.1.1.7 is the code name for the Delta variant, just to confuse you but what I
2:36:22 would like to explain that they are actually doing here is they took the results of the computer simulated genome sequencing, which they say is enough to tell that there is something different about this sequence. And they took those mutated sequences or that they didn't get the same result as the original SARS virus which was also a computer simulation And they used an actual machine to synthesize those sequences of genetic material in the laboratory. And then they put those in this other virus particle that was a particle from a cell culture that they purified out and they emptied. And then, they're putting this material inside of it and then what they do is take these synthetic pseudovirus particles that they have concocted in the laboratory and add them to a cell culture Now, they say what will happen
2:37:25 synthetic pseudovirus will invade the cells in that culture. And then what they do is they mix different monoclonal antibodies that they say are for the SARS coronavirus with the cell culture, and depending on how they react, that's how they guesstimate what the clinical response. So for example there are these monoclonal antibodies that they have identified. And I'm not even gonna get into that this research also is based on a lot of false assumptions, but let's take it at face value once again that they have an antibody for example, that's called a neutralizing antibody and they say that this is the antibody that actually protects you from the infection
2:38:18 So when they add the neutralizing antibody to this pseudovirus cell culture, big mess. They can say well how tight does it bind? Does it react with this neutralizing antibody and if it doesn't react very well then they say it causes a more severe illness Or they might say, based on the same kind of experiment that it is more or less transmissible. But not once did they ever do a clinical study with people who were infected with this because they would have to first prove that it exists, then find out a way to reliably identify it and then look at people with this variant versus another variant that they do the same way and ascertain the information over time. But this is not really done for example when we're talking about the issue of asymptomatic transmission, the notion that people without symptoms can transmit disease to other people
2:39:21 There are real world studies and they all show that there was no transmission. But that wasn't good enough to justify the policies of social distancing and lockdowns, so what did they do is they created a computer simulation study and they tweaked the parameters on that simulation in order to make sure it showed that social isolation was effective at reducing transmission. The problem was is these illnesses don't exist inside of a computer or on a silicon wafer. They they exist in the real world people in the real world experience illness and sickness, and if we ever want to truly understand what is making people ill, we need to put aside all of this false and fraudulent research and actually study what is really in nature