Wuhan Institute of Virology, COVID-19 Lab Leak Theory
The discussion centers on the origin of COVID-19, highlighting evidence that samples from miners were sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Claims are made that Dr. Fauci and the NIH funded gain-of-function research in China despite public denials. The narrative suggests that mainstream media and fact-checkers are now forced to admit the virus may be man-made after previously debunking the theory.
wuhan institute of virology· covid-19· dr. fauci· gain of function· rand paul
00:00 endless red tape to keep the truth confined. Tuesday live feed, globalists, ladies and gentlemen, have now begun forced segregation of vaxxed and non-vaxxed. And they have begun giving children inoculations without parental consent all over the Western world. This all is completely illegal, completely outrageous. And if it was a liquor, it'd be 200 proof. That means solid alcohol, solid poison. This isn't Oklahoma Bible Belt 2% beer. This is 200 proof, baby. From the front lines of the information war, it's Alex Jones.
00:49 Samples from the dying miners were sent to China's highest security bio lab, 1500km to the north to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. They had tests that they sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology which tested positive for a coronavirus. And samples of the bat coronavirus taken from the faeces in the mine were also taken to the Wuhan lab. Comparison tests would later reveal it was a 96% match to COVID-19. The very simple data elements on the ground all point to the likelihood that this virus came from a lab. Someone will say, well, maybe somebody took it from the wild.
01:34 put it in the lab, and then it escaped from the lab. But that means it was in the wild to begin with. So that's why I don't get what they're talking about. If it isn't manipulated in the lab, and you're trying to say it escaped from the lab, then how did it get in the lab? It got in the lab because somebody isolated it from the environment. Government defenders of gain of function, such as yourself, Say that COVID-19 mutations were random and not designed by man, but interestingly the technique that Dr. Barak developed forces mutations by serial passage through cell culture that the mutations appear to be natural. We have not funded gain-of-function research on this virus.
02:20 in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. No matter how many times you say it, it didn't happen. and they did it by merging a new spike protein on it. That is gain of function. That was joint research between the Wuhan Institute and Dr. Barak. You can't deny it. A year ago, they had Time Magazine, Newsweek articles, Snopes articles, NewsGuard articles that the company that Bill Gates owns.
02:56 saying that I'm debunked and my guests are debunked and that there was never any connection to the Wuhan lab origin or the virus is manufactured even though top scientist 16 months ago scanned it and said it's five different viruses. Well now they're having to admit it's man-made and Fauci now says looks like it may have come from a lab in China. I think that we should continue to investigate what went on in China until we find out to the best of our ability exactly what happened. Oh, but who ran the program to weaponize COVID virus, coronavirus? It was Fauci and that's come out in Congress last week. Wuhan origin for the virus is a no-brainer. Wuhan is home to China's leading center for coronavirus research. Researchers were genetically engineering bat coronaviruses to attack human cells. They were doing so under minimal safety conditions. If the virus with an uninspected infectiousness had been generated there, its escape would be no surprise. Journalists want to know. Secretary of State wants to know.
03:57 Secretary of Health and Human Services want to know, journalists want to know, Republicans want to know, Americans want to know, why don't Democrats in Congress want to know where this thing started? But everybody's having a field day with USA Today fact checkers and Snopes fact checkers saying Jones is full of it a year ago and Senator Rand Paul's full of it. Why there's no connection to Wuhan Why? Because, why? We sent a fact-checking team to Wuhan that spent three hours there and it was run by the people that ran the Wuhan operation. And David of course made it out of Wuhan a year ago just before the lockdown. Joining us tonight from Shanghai, David, what have you learned? It was after the Huanan seafood market, the original ground zero, at least believed to have been the ground zero by Chinese authorities,
04:45 had to close down and that was wiping it clean. And they were doing so according to Chinese authorities so as to stop it from spreading. But in doing that, you're also destroying evidence from a scientific perspective. But even if there is unfettered access, etc., etc., and the months that will be required to undertake this kind of examination does take place, at the end of the day, the WHO is owned and operated by the sovereign states of the United Nations, one of which is China, and a very important one at that. And so where I get concerned is that the word independent is simply not really accurate. This is not an independent organization nor an independent investigation. They've concluded that it's most likely that the virus came through transmission from bats to human via another animal and very unlikely it came from a Wuhan lab. So you don't know something's real until mainstream media has debunked it. As soon as you see that,
