Wednesday, 26 June 2024

Nick Fuentes Talks Trump Assassination, Civil War, And WWIII With Alex Jones

A deep dive into the legal warfare and geopolitical shifts threatening the American republic as populist leaders prepare for a high-stakes confrontation with the federal bureaucracy.

By The Alex Jones Show | 1h 53m listen | 22 chapters
Nick Fuentes Talks Trump Assassination, Civil War, And WWIII With Alex Jones cover

About this episode

Donald Trump faces a critical decision point as the 2024 election approaches, with Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones warning of a deep state maneuver to prevent his return to the White House. The Supreme Court recently issued a controversial ruling on federal censorship, prompting Justice Samuel Alito to issue a stinging dissent against government-induced pressure on social media platforms. These developments occur against a backdrop of escalating political tensions and historical precedents of state-sponsored assassinations involving figures like JFK and RFK.

Nick Fuentes critiques Republican-appointed justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh for failing to protect the First Amendment in cases brought by the Missouri and Louisiana attorneys general. Beyond the judiciary, the discussion details the collapse of American hegemony as the Ukraine war drains the U.S. dollar and Israel faces a strategic stalemate against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Specific claims include the weaponization of the census via mass migration, the failure of the Iron Dome against 100,000 missiles, and the record-breaking $15 million AIPAC expenditure to unseat Representative Jamal Bowman. The hosts also address the ongoing liquidation of InfoWars and the cancellation of the AFPAC conference in Detroit as evidence of a coordinated lawfare campaign.

Nick Fuentes describes the current elite reliance on Artificial Intelligence as a ghost dance while Alex Jones promotes Dr. Jones Naturals nano silver products. The conversation shifts to the potential for a city-wide lockdown during the Democratic National Convention in Chicago due to anticipated unrest. Both men emphasize that the populist movement must prepare for a second Trump term by reclassifying 50,000 federal employees under Schedule F to dismantle the existing bureaucracy.


CHAPTER 01 / 22 Discussion

Deep State Conflict, Trump Election Prospects, and Potential Assassination

Donald Trump faces a critical decision point as elites and the deep state allegedly maneuver to prevent his re-election. The Supreme Court is accused of intervening to protect Joe Biden's administration despite evidence of federal agencies pressuring social media companies to censor speech. Concerns are raised regarding escalating tactics against Trump, including the historical precedent of assassinations involving figures like JFK and RFK.

donald trump· deep state· supreme court· joe biden· fbi· jfk· rfk

00:00 This political conflict is coming to a head. I think the deep state, the elites know that the moment of decision is arriving when possibly and maybe it's likely Donald Trump may be elected and throw off the yoke of a certain faction of the American elite for good. And I think Trump has maybe learned his lesson. I think certainly the American people have about what happens when you let Hillary Clinton off the hook and when you try to cut deals with Facebook as Trump did in exchange for not totally leaning on them from the conservative direction. And so I think they all realize that they have to make a full play Against anybody anywhere that's trying to undo or reverse what they have done. That's right Trump now knows when they sit there and lie to his face It's a lie. He's got to not go off what they say, but who they've supported in the past and They keep saying oh, he's gonna be vindictive. He's gonna he it's not vindictive This is a deep state coup that we're trying to struggle out of it is his duty not just his right to go after him the Supreme Court is like

00:56 putting their finger on the scale, last minute we're winning, landslide, and they run in for the deep state and the establishment and do this. That's exactly how it appears to me and I don't see any other explanation for it because as you said it's as cut and dry as it gets. We have evidence and it's not just one, it was over a dozen federal agencies in the most direct possible way, emails, text messages, as you said delete this right effing now, laced with expletives, And the Supreme Court intervenes and says the government has a right to lean on these major publishers with censorship. It's totally ridiculous and from conservative judges. So

01:34 I think what else can you call it other than they are putting their finger on the scale and trying to save their guy for the deep state. They're trying to save their guy Joe Biden. Well, something's got to give. The empire is stretched too thin and there's conflict on every continent. There's the three major ones you pointed out, Ukraine, Gaza, Taiwan, but there's also the smaller ones. There's Azerbaijan, Armenia, there's Kosovo in Serbia, there's Guyana and the Essequibo in Venezuela. something has got to give. We are over committed, we're overstretched. This is what happens of 30 years of basically unchallenged American hegemony and we started to believe that we were God. We started to believe that we could do anything. We could fight a hundred wars at one time. You know somehow it went from like we need to fight two to like we need to fight a war everywhere all the time. And so if I were to call it

02:23 Xi Jinping's term ends in twenty twenty seven twenty twenty eight. And I think that is when they're planning on making their move and going for Taiwan it seems that the situation has become a little bit more balanced the United States is rushed a lot of defensive aid over there and they've been making a lot of diplomatic visits over there to deter any kind of attack. But China's been getting a lot more bold they're sending out more planes over the sky sending more ships over there than ever. And so I think that There is going to be a real scenario where it's a full on crisis, where Russia is going to take the entire coast of the Black Sea. There is going to be a major war in Lebanon that Israel cannot win. China is going to take Taiwan and there's nothing the United States can do about it. The predictive programming is everywhere that Barack Obama produced that movie, Leave It All Behind. It just gets so blatant. Barack

03:12 Obama producing a Netflix movie about Civil War, then you get an actual movie called Civil War, you're going to get a nut job. You're going to get some lone wolf guy, his best friend is an FBI informant, we're going to find out he's going to go and kill a bunch of people. And whatever the crisis is going to be, because there's bound to be one with all the tension and all the, you know, this crisis that's going on in the country, they're going to use that to calm down hard. And the Supreme, you know, bring it full circle, the Supreme Court ruling is going to give them the power to do that, to calm down hard on X, TikTok, it's gonna be the end of free speech. And they're also going to use that, you know, maybe and probably to flip the election back towards Biden. And then once you get Biden in, it's gonna be the January 6th DOJ on steroids. Just like they've been coming after patriots, they've been doing it since Obama, the backdoor gun control and all that kind of stuff. They're gonna be doing that again all over this time to, I think, finally put the MAGA movement in the ground. And the thing is about Trump, you have to realize they have thrown everything

04:09 short of assassination at him. That's one way to look at it. If there's kind of a escalating menu of options that they could do to prevent an individual man from taking power, prevent this campaign that he's been on, they've done everything short of that. Impeachment, lawfare, they've gone after his family, they've lied about him in the press. They've played every card but assassination. everything up to that. And if you think that that's something that isn't on the table, it's as you said, JFK, his brother, RFK, his son, there's a whole host of them, MLK, Malcolm X, you name it. This is something that the intelligence agency specialize in. And when you get these major false flags and when you get these major wars, you have

04:55 you also get the assassinations too. And so I don't think it's outside the realm of possibilities, you say. I think it's probably far more likely than most people think. And it's truly a scary proposition because somebody goes down like that and there are going to be riots in the streets. And I think that's why it's very, very important that people now more than ever have to be extremely discerning and extremely careful. And you and I both know the kind of drag that happened after January 6th. People, it's not a joke. You know, the feds are coming down on people. They are gonna be as liberal as possible when they interpret some of these statutes. People have to be very, very sensible and smart about how they conduct themselves in the next six months. While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Visit infowars.com forward slash show and share the link today.

CHAPTER 02 / 22 Discussion

Alex Jones Introduces Nick Fuentes, Supreme Court Censorship Ruling

Alex Jones introduces populist firebrand Nick Fuentes to discuss the 35,000-foot view of global events and the recent Supreme Court ruling on government-induced censorship. Justice Samuel Alito issued a stinging dissent, labeling the case one of the most important for free speech while criticizing the court's refusal to address the merits of the evidence. The discussion touches on the ADL and the perceived anti-Western bias in modern media and education.

nick fuentes· alex jones· samuel alito· adl· supreme court· first amendment

05:49 Waging war on corruption. It's Alex Jones coming to you live from the front lines of the InfoWar. All right, when I announced this morning that Nick J. Foyntess would join us for about an hour and a half live today, which we appreciate him doing, the popular firebrand, the populist firebrand, I saw a lot of commenters saying, oh, what are you going to cover? The Trump green card? the debate coming up tomorrow night, maybe he can pop in at the end of the debate, give us his take. Lebanon, Jamal Bowman, and what just happened with AIPAC taking him out. And yes, we're going to get to that, but I wanna cover 35,000 foot view stuff and get Nick's take on that because I see him talking about history and big other world events and he done his homework. People can say, what do you got Nick Fuentes on? This Nazi, I wouldn't call him a Nazi,

06:45 But I'll explain. Where I stand is 100% clear. When the ADL, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Democratic Party, the major media literally says you're bad to be white, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, CNN, everywhere. And my six-year-old daughter, now seven, was at a summer camp last year for a sports camp. And during lunch, they had on loudspeakers that white people are inherently bad. And she said, am I bad because I'm white? It is healthy for white people to stand up and say, I'm not going to take this anymore and I'm not going to be guilty. Now you can go to an extreme then of hating everybody else that isn't white. In my view, most people that aren't white are not out to get us and they're good people. But a large group are being brainwashed and whites are a minority 7% worldwide. So overall, I've been thinking

07:31 compared to the ADL's total supremacy, anti-Western, anti-Christian stuff, well, what do you expect you're gonna conjure with what you're doing? And so in an Overton window, Nick Fuentes moves it over here away from all whites are bad and we're the devil and we should pay reparations and kill ourselves with Nick over here saying basically the opposite. I see a larger 35,000 foot view of divide and conquer and trying to counter it. We'll get his take on that, but I wanted to ask him about this incredibly insane Supreme Court ruling that's totally cut and dry. And Justice Samuel Alito eviscerated and said, I'll read the quotes here in a moment. This is the most important Supreme Court case ever. It's cut and dry, the states and the Congress have all the evidence. And the Supreme Court said this doesn't exist, that none of this is going on. The government's not surveilling and censoring, but they can do it.

08:24 Were they blackmailed? There's major pressure on the Supreme Court. Are they waiting for one of these other big cases to shoot down the censorship there? But this is 131 days from the election. They stole 2020, they were able to mitigate and still a lot of Republican wins and water that down two years ago. This is a huge deal. So let me read a few quotes and we'll get to Nick. As I want to take, but here's Alito rails against White House and social media case dissent. All right, that's the Hill newspaper. And let me just read the quotes out of his dissenting and I've got the full order here as well. Vermont's high ranking government officials placed unrelenting pressure on Facebook, this is one area they focused in on to suppress Americans free speech during an election I would add. Alito wrote, because the court unjustifiably refuses to address the serious threat to the American First Amendment, I respectfully dissent. He went on,

09:21 With more of the quotes, I assume that a fair portion of what social media users had to say about COVID-19 and the pandemic was of little lasting value, Alito wrote in dissent. Some was undoubtedly untrue and misleading, and some may have been downright dangerous. But we know now that valuable speech was also suppressed. Continuing, here's the key quote. If the lower court's assessment of the voluminous record is correct, this is one of the most important free speech cases to reach the court in years. And why does he say that? Because I've now scanned over the ruling. They refuse to look at the merits and the evidence and said, and I have Fox News reporting around here, that the Supreme Court did not believe this conduct was happening. Says it right here. The justices appeared broadly skeptical that the claims were even happening.

10:18 You've seen the hearings, you've experienced it, you've seen the emails, you've seen the documents, my God. So this is what they do, they deny this is happening. It's like the UN replacement migration, saying we're gonna get rid of the West, it's not compatible, white people aren't compatible. 2000 document, 2001 document, now it's official policy of the NGOs. And then when you publish it or show it, they censor you saying it doesn't exist. And Sacha Baron Cohen at the ADL event says you'd be put in jail if you talk about it. So they can't address this head on because it destroys these arguments, it's total tyranny. So they just say it's not happening. Now, Nick, I just did a long four minute intro, I apologize for that. I'm gonna give you the floor now on this situation.

CHAPTER 03 / 22 Discussion

Federal Agency Pressure, Big Tech Censorship, and Judicial Appointments

Nick Fuentes critiques the conservative majority on the Supreme Court, specifically Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh, for siding with the government in censorship cases. Evidence from Missouri and Louisiana attorneys general showed federal agencies directly ordering Facebook and Twitter to remove specific content. The failure of Republican-appointed judges to protect the First Amendment raises questions about the vetting process of the Federalist Society.

missouri· louisiana· amy coney barrett· brett kavanaugh· federalist society· elon musk

11:04 Yeah, well, you're absolutely right. This is a totally ridiculous situation and it's extremely disappointing because we actually have a conservative majority on the court. It's supposed to be at least a 5-4, at most a 6-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court at least since 2020. And in spite of that, we keep getting all these terrible rulings. And it's like you said, all the evidence is there. It was the Missouri and Louisiana attorneys general, they found all this evidence that over a dozen federal departments and agencies were in direct contact with social media companies advocating for them and in some cases directly ordering them to suppress particular individuals, groups, in some cases even particular posts relating to the pandemic. It's about as cut and dry as you said, in your words, it's about as cut and dry as it gets. This is government censorship.

11:57 which makes it a first amendment issue. Because you know for a long time they said well when Twitter or Facebook suppresses free speech, of course that was before Elon Musk acquired Twitter, but when they were suppressing free speech people would make the argument that well these are private companies, it's their prerogative to do it, it's freedom of association, they can choose which content they want to publish or not. And you know putting aside that argument for a moment At least that was maybe tenable at one point. But in this case, it's very cut and dry that the government was directly advocating for certain posts to be terminated. There were even specific examples where the White House press office was sending an email to Facebook saying, hey, delete this post. And Facebook replied by email and said,

12:43 Right away, we deleted it right now, absolutely, per your request. There's even quotes where, and we have to delay this, about the cuss. It's like, god damn it, why the fuck haven't you taken this down? It's been 24 hours. I mean, they're cussing at them saying do it. Exactly. And so it is as cut and dry as it gets. I mean, they're literally ordering them to delete things and remove certain users. And I was actually so I was I was a little bit pleasantly surprised that the lower court ruled that this was wrong because, you know, so rarely do we get a victory on issues like this. But it seems like in the past few years, it's been a bit of a by the way, to lower courts just in this case. I mean, I'll write the Supreme Court. Yeah.

13:23 Yeah, and so the Supreme Court then acquiring this with the majority and with Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh siding with the government in this case and basically giving them the green light. And it's always on the tactical grounds. This is where the conservative court always fails us. They always say, well, you didn't do it exactly correctly or, oh, you don't have legal standing or something like that. This is the constitutional issue maybe of of our lifetime. As we know, the First Amendment is the most important amendment because it's what protects our freedom of conscience, what protects, I mean, really the foundational rights, assembly, speech, and so on. And we know that there's been a big problem with big tech and government polluting. Rather than relieve the injury on this, they're going to side with the government? It's really shocking. It's really outrageous and offensive. And it begs the question,

14:09 Can we rely on institutions like the Federalist Society and the Republican Party to put up judges like this in the future? Because, you know, that is one of the things that is considered one of the best parts of President Trump's legacy from his first term was that he transformed the face of the federal judiciary by appointing a record number of judges. That includes the three Supreme Court judges that he nominated. But we see over and over again these judges especially on the Supreme Court, especially Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett giving these terrible decisions. And not just on this, on gun rights, on the 2020 election, in some cases on immigration. I don't think that we can rely anymore on the expertise of the Federalist Society, Kev McCarthy and Mitch McConnell to pick these people. And as always, it all goes back down to personnel. Who are going to be the people that are making the decisions in the judiciary? Who are going to be the people making the decisions

15:05 in the Senate and in the potentially the next Trump administration about who these appointees will be. That's always the operative question. And it just goes to show that we're not going to find the right people from Yale, Harvard, and from the Republican Party. They disappoint us time and again in the legislature, the judiciary, and the executive. So it's just the latest disappointment. I'm not I'm not totally surprised that it went this way. And unfortunately, there is one other major decision they have yet to rule on. And it makes me a little bit nervous about that. As you know, there were two major free speech laws

CHAPTER 04 / 22 Discussion

Texas and Florida Social Media Laws, X and TikTok Influence

State-level free speech laws in Florida and Texas face legal challenges as the 2024 election approaches. Platforms like X and TikTok are identified as the primary drivers of political consciousness, bypassing traditional media gatekeepers. Justice Samuel Alito is praised for his defiant stance against censorship, while the broader deep state is described as making a "full play" to reverse populist gains.

texas· florida· tiktok· elon musk· charlie kirk· samuel alito· 2024 election

15:41 Florida and Texas that were meant to remedy big tech censorship. They're both slightly different. There was one law passed in the Florida state legislature and that specifically applied to people seeking office. That they could not be banned from social media or else the big tech would incur a fine. And then in Texas there was a similar law but it was about viewpoint discrimination that, you know, if you were banned for expressing a particular ideology and if you could prove that in court, you could get some. legal relief for that. And so both of these laws were challenged by Big Tech and a firm that represents all the Big Tech consortium of the Big Tech companies. That is one of the other forthcoming decisions that the Supreme Court is going to hand down probably later this year. And of course relating to similar topics, Big Tech and free speech.

16:30 Based on this decision, I'm not very optimistic about this. And you brought in something which I think is extremely relevant. As you said, the election is 130 days out, 132, 130 days. We're not long before the next presidential election. As we know, social media dictates the outcome of these national elections, especially the presidency. You know, and I don't love Charlie Kirk, but he had a good tweet about this the other day. He said in 2016 it was the Twitter election, in 2020 it was the Instagram election, in 2024 this is the X and TikTok election. And the reason for that, these are two huge platforms that are growing faster than any other platform, and they are because they're free speech, because they totally liberalized community guidelines, terms of service, they've allowed people like you and I back on the platform, at least on X, I think you and I are both banned on TikTok, but our content proliferates there on TikTok regardless.

17:23 And so it's these free speech platforms that are now defining this right wing comeback. It's defining this consciousness raising, I think we talked about it last time. And it seems like now in the 11th hour, right before the moment of decision and the all important remaining six months, the debate is tomorrow, the conventions are coming up. Now it seems like these courts are coming in and they're trying to undo what has been done, the progress that has been made. by Elon Musk acquiring Twitter and by TikTok, which through their proprietary algorithm is a lot better. So we have the, no I agree, I was going to say that before you came on, you're thinking the same thing, it's obvious, but it's so crazy. The Supreme Court is like putting their finger on the scale, last minute we're winning, landslide, and they run in for the deep state and the establishment and do this.

18:13 That's exactly how it appears to me and I don't see any other explanation for it because as you said it's as cut and dry as it gets. We have evidence and it's not just one, it was over a dozen federal agencies in the most direct possible way, emails, text messages, as you said, delete this right effing now, laced with expletives and the Supreme Court intervenes and says the government has a right to lean on these major publishers with censorship. It's totally ridiculous and from conservative judges. So I think what else can you call it other than they are putting their finger on the scale and trying to save their guy for the deep state. They're trying to save their guy, Joe Biden. No, I totally agree. But that makes me like Alito and, you know, even more because they secretly record him a month ago at an event with judges.

19:03 And he just says F them when they control my free speech. I'll fly a flag upside down. Screw them. I'm tired of these people. They go, look, he's bad. He's partisan. No, he's pro-free speech. I mean, I think Alito is becoming, I think even better than Thomas because it seems like they don't control him and it's only pissing him off. Yeah, absolutely. Well, they've all had their fair share of scrutiny. There was a major ProPublica piece about Clarence Thomas recently, too. And so like you, I've noticed the major pressure on Samuel Alito. There's been the scandal about him flying the flag upside down and the various flags they've flown outside the house. And so it seems like they're really putting the screws on these conservative judges. This is it's like everything else.

19:45 This political conflict is coming to a head. I think the deep state, the elites know that the moment of decision is arriving when possibly, and maybe it's likely, Donald Trump may be elected and throw off the yoke of a certain faction of the American elite for good. And I think Trump has maybe learned his lesson. I think certainly the American people have about what happens when you let Hillary Clinton off the hook and when you try to cut deals with Facebook as Trump did in exchange for not totally leaning on them from the conservative direction. And so I think they all realize that they have to make a full play. Against anybody anywhere that's trying to undo or reverse what they have done. That's right. Trump now knows when they sit there and lie to his face It's a lie. He's got to knock off what they say, but who they've supported in the past

CHAPTER 05 / 22 Discussion

Border Security, Mass Migration, and Demographic Shifts

Nick Fuentes outlines a "Day One" plan for a potential second Trump term, prioritizing the total closure of the U.S. border and the construction of a 30-foot concrete wall. The current immigration system is characterized as a scheme to import socialist-leaning voters and alter the Electoral College through the census. The discussion emphasizes that mass migration undermines the original interpretation of the Constitution and the Second Amendment.

mexico· california· second amendment· electoral college· mass migration· socialism

20:29 And they keep saying, he's gonna be vindictive. It's not vindictive. This is a deep state coup that we're trying to struggle out of. It is his duty, not just his right to go after him. So let me say, you're President Trump in 131 days, he gets reelected. During that 79 days before the inauguration, they're gonna cause civil unrest. They're gonna call it race war, civil war, that's all pre-programmed. Put on your prediction cap here of what you think they're going to pull. I mean, I want to say the election fraud won't be enough to steal it. The numbers are there. So let's just hypothetically say Trump wins in 131 days. What happens then and what can we do to make sure he gets in? And then how do we hold his feet to the fire and make sure he doesn't compromise just out of some of his political ignorance? And that's what's going on for my own research. And then the big question, that's a lot of questions.

21:19 What would you do if you were President Trump? If Nick J. Fuentes was sworn in January 21st, 2025, what does Nick Fuentes do? Let's just start there. Well, day one, I mean, the first thing you got to do is close the border, because that is, people talk about election fraud, and you could talk about ballots, you could talk about media, but the biggest way that they're stealing elections is they're importing voters. They're importing these people. I imagine a lot of them are voting illicitly. And even if they're not, of course, Well, of course they are. And even if they're not, they're also being counted in the census, which is how the electoral college votes are allocated, how the house is allocated. And of course, these people come over here and they're having a lot of kids. It's anchors away. They're having anchor babies. Those people become citizens. And this is how California went from red to blue, how it went from Nixon, Reagan, landslide to blue forever.

22:08 because global's talking about this week they said we want Latin Americans because they vote socialist. Talking about their skin color, they vote socialist, they're immediately having federal tit put in their mouth and so they've got generational voters right now. That's exactly right and the numbers don't lie. They do not support original interpretation of the Constitution. They do not support the Second Amendment. They do not believe that hate speech is free speech. So you're right, we move towards a European socialist style country with this mass migration scheme that they've cooked up. It's Texas, it's Nevada, it's almost nearly every state at this point. So day one,

CHAPTER 06 / 22 Discussion

Ukraine War, Global Energy Crisis, and AI Skepticism

The war in Ukraine is described as a disaster for the U.S. dollar due to the weaponization of foreign currency reserves. The sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline has led to industrial decline in Germany and rising energy costs globally. Furthermore, the elite's reliance on Artificial Intelligence is dismissed as a "ghost dance" or a technological delusion that cannot solve fundamental ecological and diplomatic failures.

russia· ukraine· nord stream· germany· shale oil· artificial intelligence

22:43 you close the border. You have to get these people to remain in Mexico. You have to restart the building of the wall. And I would say build a real wall this time, not an 18 foot steel bollard fence, a 30 foot concrete wall like the one that was promised. Use the military appropriations. That's first thing I would do. Number two, make a deal with Russia. End this war in Ukraine. People have no idea yet how much damage this is causing to us and our allies. Explain it, it's killing the dollar. The biggest enemy of America is the globalists, they're killing it. Precisely. More and more countries are moving away from the dollar because the United States weaponized it in the aftermath of Russia's war in Ukraine. They seized Russia's foreign currency reserves, seizing Russia's assets. Now they're talking about selling them. But it's not only that. By sabotaging Nord Stream 1, they also made it so that Germany has sky-high energy costs, and now they're not going to be able to remain an industrial nation. We're all

23:40 We're all going to have massive energy demand because of these data centers due to AI. The amount of energy consumed by data centers is going to go up to 10% of the total energy consumption by the end of this decade. We're reaching peak shale oil. We may be reaching peak oil altogether. The energy demand is going up. Energy supply is going to stop growing. And notice the left wants to ban cows and cars, but never their data centers. 100% and we're not able to get the energy anymore because we blew up the pipelines from Russia and we've now made it so that Russia and China are not able to cooperate normally in the global economy. We can't get those resources out of there. And notice how when the CIA and the Pentagon two years ago blew up Nord Stream,

24:27 They didn't think it would then double energy prices and make Alternative for Deutschland win. So then their answer is ban Alternative for Deutschland, that's now the biggest party in Germany. I mean, this is not going their way. Populists are winning everywhere, nationalists are winning everywhere, and the more the globalists squeeze, the more they lose. It's true everything that they do it's an equal and opposite reaction and but this is a very dangerous time because they are in a panic. They their position and their grip on power is extremely precarious and this is where I think the elite is given to making mistakes and unforced errors because they're panicked because the house of cards is falling down all around them and in every way possible there's war on every continent. The economy is getting squeezed you know between inflation and the high interest rates stagflation

25:14 These people have not been planning ahead. They've not been thinking carefully about our problems. They really do believe that they're going to be able to censor and ban all their political problems. They think they're going to be able to print their way out of all of their money problems. They think they're going to be able to print their way and use air power out of all of the military and defense diplomacy problems in the world. And on some level, they think that artificial intelligence is going to solve whatever they can't do. And so I see I see AI is like Vietnam believing air powered when it means nothing and people don't believe it or follow it. It's true. They really do believe, they call this effective futurism or effective whatever. They have this hope in technology that they think that they recognize there are these problems. Major things have been messed up in a way that are not easily un-messed up. Ecological problems, diplomacy, all these problems that I've just mentioned.

26:11 major, major, major problems. They have no solutions, no way out of it. And so they think that AI is going to be this deus ex machina that's just going to, it's like an Oracle. It's going to spit out the answers to all our problems. It's not, it's not sentient. It's not actual intelligence. It's like a Hobie-Indian ghost dance. What exactly? It's like some kind of spiritual thing. It's like they're doing a rain dance asking for, you know, for favorable fertility for this harvest or something. And so this house of cards is coming crashing down. The question is, can we catch the falling knife and prevent it from being a complete and total cataclysm? And I think everybody sees the writing is on the wall everywhere you look. Now, that's the consensus is how do we have a survivable crash landing? Speak to that.

CHAPTER 07 / 22 Discussion

DEI Policies, Competence Crisis, and Dr. Jones Naturals

The removal of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies is presented as essential for restoring American competence and solving complex national problems. Success in a second Trump term is said to depend entirely on hiring the right personnel rather than ideological loyalists. Alex Jones transitions into a promotional segment for Dr. Jones Naturals, highlighting nano silver products and nootropics.

dei· meritocracy· trump administration· nano silver· dr. jones naturals

26:55 It's a difficult thing. I think that it starts with the political transition. We need to get these people out of power. They're reckless, they're irresponsible. For a long time, they made it seem like they were the adults in the room and it was the populace like you and I that were crazy. And you and I, we have colorful personalities, but clearly really we are much more on the ball and our fingers much more on the balls than these planners who think that it's a good idea to import limitless number of people to go to war with Russia and China and Iran all at the same time. And you know, all these endless things that just don't really make sense, but they insist do. So it starts with a political solution of getting the right people

27:32 power getting responsible people in power and we need to get smart people to start to come up with solutions. I think that's why the DEI stuff has to go because at the same time that our problems are growing in complexity and growing in number, we're getting people that are less sophisticated, less competent, less in general do not have the aptitude for it. We're choosing people based on the skin color based on ideology rather than competence. So America needs to think in terms of people power people. are the greatest asset. We need to have the right people accelerate through the advanced colleges. We need the right people to join politics. We need the right people at the helm of the White House, Congress. I really think it's important that if Trump gets an office in the second term, it all comes down to the personnel. Who is going to be hired? Who's going to be making the decisions? Because that's going to be the big problem. And then point is, stay there. Let's talk about that and some of the positive things about Trump

28:27 but also some of the negative things. And when I looked at his green card proposal, I looked at both sides. People take it out of context. I see both sides. So let's look at your criticism of his plan for college grads to get green cards when we come right back with Nick Fuentes. Stay with us. Many years ago I coined the term 360 win. That's another way of saying it's a non-zero sum game. When you have a sum game, it's a pizza, there's only so many pieces, it doesn't get bigger. But if something is symbiotic, if something empowers everybody involved with it, it is a 360 win. When you visit drjonesnaturals.com, you're not just supporting our broadcast by getting the products, you're getting game-changing products that

29:10 that really, really work and are amazing. All of the nano silver products, incredible products like Next Level Foundational Energy, products like Top Brain, an incredible nootropic, Rocket Rest, an incredible natural sleep aid, and dozens of other products not available at infoworkstore.com or exclusively available at drjonesnaturals.com. And they keep the show on the air and they're amazing, a 360 win. So please follow the links below to drjonesnaturals.com and I thank you for your support. And for breaking news and updates, be sure and follow me at RealAlexJones here on X. Defending the republic from enemies foreign and domestic. It's Alex Jones. Well, I'm really liking this conversation. This is what I want to do with Kanye a few years ago when he was in here with Nick.

CHAPTER 08 / 22 Discussion

Trump Green Card Proposal, High-Skilled Immigration Debate

Donald Trump's proposal to staple green cards to the diplomas of foreign college graduates receives mixed reactions. While intended to prevent a "brain drain," critics argue that granting residency to junior college graduates from India and China could disadvantage American workers. The policy is compared to previous proposals by Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney, sparking a debate on merit-based versus family-based migration.

donald trump· green cards· india· china· h-1b visa· mitt romney

30:01 He can go off on whatever group he wants for 10 minutes, we heard it. Now I want to see about the rest of the world and big issues and what we're going to do and the wars and the border and the AI and all of this. And so people take me out of context, it's fine, I do a four hour show every day. But I did like 10 minutes yesterday, a whole segment. And I said, I get what Nick Fuentes is saying. And I agree with a lot of the Groepers. But I said, then there's a whole nother extreme of people saying, well, we don't like anybody that isn't white. And I'm just like, That's not how I feel. I like everybody. I judge people off of how they operate and what they do. But then I also went on and I said, yeah, this Trump thing is dangerous. Just saying anybody that gets a college degree, well, they can give you mail-in degrees, and then you're a citizen. But at the same time, Trump's always been for highly skilled people that come here being able to be a citizen because that's what he's done in business. So people that are mad at Trump about it, and I get you're allowed to criticize, I'm not saying that's bad.

31:01 To me, Trump will at least mitigate and shut the border down 90%. Would you rather have that or just Biden saying, get here, come here, take over, blah, blah, blah. So I don't believe in a lesser of two evils, but also don't believe in a suicide pact. And I'm somebody very critical of Trump, so I'm not putting Nick down for being critical of him. I'm just trying to quantify that when I war game something, like in the first hour I said, Well, I hope with all these other Supreme Court First Amendment cases, they've got several big ones and a bunch of other ones. Hopefully they just gave the dog a bone. I think this is a better case here, but because they refuse to even look at it, now I see cowardice. I think they're gonna go totally against us.

31:39 But then people take the clip out from last hour and say, look, Jones is claiming the Supreme Court's on our side. No, I said, I think they're about to screw us just like Nick did. But I'm saying I'm hoping that something else, probably not. So that's the thing about a long form show, folks. We're looking at all angles. We're at the grocery store checking the fruit, squeezing it, which one's the best piece. We're trying to work through this. So you got caught up on the break, Nick J Fuentes, people can follow you. on rumble, we'll put it on screen and obviously on X, with what you would do if you were president, what you think is about to happen with the desperate left and deep state with 131 days left. And then you've taken Trump to the woodshed on his green card. And so I respect your view. I'm not saying I totally agree with it, but I definitely understand the argument and think that it is a legitimate argument. So let's quantify that.

32:32 Yeah, so on the green card issue with Donald Trump, I definitely see where you're coming from and I do agree with you. It's sort of interesting because this stapling green cards to diplomas is a very old proposal. This rhetoric has been around for over 10 years, 10 or 15 years. And if you Google it right now, staple green cards to diplomas, you'll find articles, clippings from 2011. Hillary Clinton said it, Mitt Romney said it, Charlie Kirk has said it, Joe Biden said it. Donald Trump is the latest to say it. And the idea is we have all these foreigners here studying. There's just over a million foreign students in America right now. And the idea is we want to retain some of them. I think you said on your show, we don't want to brain drain. We want to keep some of some of the best and brightest here. And I can certainly understand that.

33:19 on some level. Like if you'll have somebody who is a very specialized type of doctor, and meaning they go to a very advanced graduate school, meaning they go to medical school for many, many years, certainly that is someone who I think we would want to retain in the United States. What's interesting about what Trump said, which I, this is the part I think that was troubling to everybody, whether you're pro-immigration or more of an immigration restrictionist, is he said even a junior college graduate from India or China would get a green card under this program. He said any degree, four year advanced degree, junior college, two year degree, and it's not hard to see how that would become basically open

34:02 open borders with extra steps where you would see major firms that have a need for labor and cheap labor from foreign countries. They would be readily willing to put up the money to put as many students through it. Plus most of the states are already paying for illegals to go to college. Right, there's already subsidies on the table. So and you imagine that if a policy like that actually went through it only become more streamlined, it would turn into a big scam and they'd be able to bring in as many people as they want. And I think that is the issue. If there is unlimited labor, as Hillary Clinton envisioned of common market free movement of labor and goods,

34:40 you're talking about the American worker getting screwed. You have all these and you know maybe this is a little bit closer to home for me but for you as well because you have young children so I'm sure this is something you're thinking about too. Young people are being set up where they go to college, it's very expensive, they graduate from college, housing's unaffordable, out of control college debt is very high job markets top people are under employed and then there's this proposal on the table that we're going to just bring in as many rich Indians and Chinese. As possible and you know what they can come from anywhere for that matter they can come from from Germany or France, they'd still be taking jobs from Americans. So it's really just about finding where is the sensible immigration policy. No, I totally agree with you. And it's all been so one sided. It's healthy to say no more for now. A moratorium. I was simply saying people mad at Trump. This has always been his policy.

CHAPTER 09 / 22 Discussion

H-1B Visas, Labor Markets, and Immigration Moratorium

The discussion explores Donald Trump's historical use of immigrant labor in his business ventures and his previous attempts to recalibrate the H-1B visa program. A proposed 10-year moratorium on all immigration is suggested to allow for the assimilation of the current population and the protection of American wages. The hosts argue that even Hispanic voters are increasingly supporting border restrictions to protect their own economic interests.

h-1b visa· eastern europe· raise act· assimilation· immigration moratorium

35:30 And if you go to one of his hotels, it's mainly Eastern Europeans. That's who he can get cheap that quite frankly wanted. And I'm not saying Americans are lazy. It's just harder to find them and organize them though through these trade groups, through these corporate organizations. You're on a cruise ship, it's Eastern Europeans. You're in a fancy hotel, it's Eastern Europeans. Because for whatever reason, they'll get the job done, they'll do it. That's the group they found that'll do it. I understand Trump's being honest about where he's made his money at his casinos, at his hotels. So it's just Trump being honest. So I don't see it as a bad thing against Trump. You can say it's a bad policy. I'm just saying it's not some betrayal because that's what Trump's always done.

36:08 Well, I would say that in 2016 he did say that he would revise the H-1B visa program. So it is a little bit of a shift on the policy, but you are right. Throughout his business career, he did use immigrant labor. You're absolutely right about that. And you're also 100% right that, and this is something that you notice, and this shows that people are getting the information on Infowars, is that Donald Trump did attempt to recalibrate immigration. And you're 100% on the money that the Trump administration, the focus shifted from family-based migration and humanitarian-based migration, meaning refugees and asylum seekers, to temporary or permanent work visas. So there was

36:49 a recalibration and that was also the basis of another proposal during the Trump administration called the RAISE Act which actually would have reduced legal immigration by up to 50% but it would have focused on bringing over immigrants based on merit rather than based on family connection. And that's the thing about Trump, he is a robot about money, he looks at transactional. Exactly, he doesn't want a bunch of criminals and handicaps and mental patients. That's what we're getting now. He's like, no, we don't want them. But if you want to come work, we'll take you and then and then send you home basically. And that makes perfect sense. If you were to start from scratch and drop an immigration policy, you would not drop the current immigration policy where the border is wide open and everybody comes here illegally and the people that come here legally, they just have a cousin that was here or, you know, they're

37:37 everyone is apparently fleeing a war. I guess if your country has a low enough standard of living, you could claim you're seeking asylum from something. So you probably would draft up an immigration policy like Trump's, which would favor merit, favor where the labor market needs the specialized labor. I think though across the board, it just has to be much, much lower. You know, and he keeps saying this, and this is one of the criticisms I have. He keeps going out there and saying we desperately need the labor, we desperately need the immigration. We have had always increasing immigration for like 30 years. It's massive. We have the largest foreign-born percentage of the population than ever before. And the thing is about American immigration policy is it always came in waves.

38:20 That was one of the things that was distinct about it before, one among others, is that it came in waves. We bring in a lot of people and then slam the door for 30 years. We bring in a lot of people and then slam the door. Because we had to get them to come over to our system. And that's the key. Because the UN, the left, the universities, the media, they're weaponizing people. That's why I'm for a 10-year moratorium. If you want to get technical and I can get Trump to do what I wanted, I would just say nobody 10 years and then let's build up America. So if you want to know where I would stand, I'd say 10 years, zero immigration basically. Me too. That's exactly, you know, he asked what would I do on day one if I were Trump at the convention, I would say, you know what, we have just had too much immigration for too long and it's not helping anybody. You know, and it's actually interesting. Hispanics are becoming more Republican. It's these third and fourth generation Hispanics who are actually now reacting against the first generation Hispanics that are coming over and taking their jobs.

39:16 So it's like you said, and I said this on Twitter, it almost isn't even necessarily a race issue. Race is a component, but it doesn't need to be because it's affecting everybody economically, culturally, socially. And so if you're Trump, if you wanna be the most forward thinking, the most progressive, and by progressive, I don't mean left, but I mean forward, it would be, as you said, 10 year moratorium. close the border and assimilate the people that are here, get the Americans jobs, get American wage strides. We basically have eaten like 20 pounds of meat. We got to digest this. And that's a perfect analogy because we've just had like tens of millions every decade, one after the last, and it's having a profound political, social, economic impact on the country. And I said this the other day also, where is the dissent on this issue? This is one of the other things that I'm just not happy about with this Trump campaign. One, because like you said, there's good and there's bad. But one of the things I don't like is that there doesn't seem to be any allowance for a difference of opinion

40:19 on immigration. Biden is pro mass migration. It seems now that Trump is in favor of mass legal immigration. And it seems like we're sliding backwards towards this uni party thing where it's like you vote for the left or the right and you really just get the same thing either way with just a marginal little difference. And so that's why I'd like to see Trump who now has this renewed popularity And I think a lot of political capital and a major opportunity to say, you know what? I was vindicated. I said build the wall. They didn't let me. The Republicans didn't let Trump build the wall because he had a Republican. Exactly. He shouldn't be backing off a winning issue that's also good for the country. So shifting gears the time we have left, I got a lot of questions, a lot of comments.

CHAPTER 10 / 22 Discussion

Joe Biden Cognitive Decline, DNC Convention, and Chicago Unrest

Speculation grows regarding Joe Biden's ability to remain the Democratic nominee following visible cognitive decline and "cheap fake" media controversies. The upcoming Democratic National Convention in Chicago is expected to face significant unrest from radical activists, potentially leading to a city-wide lockdown. Comparisons are made to the cleaning of San Francisco streets for Xi Jinping's visit.

joe biden· roger stone· chicago· dnc· xi jinping· cheap fakes

41:00 Any other points about the election coming up, 131 days, what the deep state may pull. Then I wanna talk about Israel, the ADL. They did their full push for censorship, it blew up in their face. The whole world's turned against it and where you think that's going and Lebanon and Gaza and all the rest of it. But just other points about what is the deep state gonna do as it becomes obvious, I think Trump's gonna win. Well, one thing I think that's on everybody's mind that everybody's talking about is I don't think people are even confident that Biden will be the nominee. I know everyone said that for a long time and we're pretty late in the game, but it'll be very interesting to see tomorrow how Biden performs because there has been, and I'm pretty critical of people that obsess on this in particular,

41:47 But there's been a very noticeable cognitive decline in just the past few months. It was bad in 2020. It's been four years. He's gotten really bad lately. Like he just can't even go out in public without some kind of major gaffe or he gets lost or something. It'll be interesting to see what that looks like tomorrow. And don't you love the new claim that they're quote cheap fakes? Yeah, I saw that it's a cheap fake. It's real footage. I mean, everybody sees it. They're real people. But this is just like one of those things where now they're just brazenly lying to your face. Don't believe your lying eyes. You watch this stuff and oh, it's a cheap fake. Isn't that convenient? I guess now whenever anything bad happens, anybody is in an embarrassing moment, we can all just blame it on AI, deep fakes or something. It's obviously real. And I think that there is a slight chance that he may be replaced at the top of the ticket. I wouldn't put money on that, but if I were to put money on- Well, that's what Roger Stone's been saying for three years.

42:42 And I think he's right. I mean, if you were to put money on some Democrat hijinks, that would be one of the big ones is that they're gonna do something. They're already wanting, here in Chicago, they're already wanting a virtual convention. Well, and they want that. I think that's because of the Ohio deadline where the Ohio, they need the nominee before August, the conventions in August. The other thing though, is they know these radicals are gonna come to the convention and cause all kinds of trouble. It's a classic case of, I was talking to my barber about this. you know when Xi Jinping goes to California, they clean up the streets, there's no more poo on the streets, there's no more homeless, no more urine anywhere. And it's going to be the same thing when Joe Biden and the Democrats come into town, they're going to lock this city down. You know, they are for the past year, they got rid of the the shot spotter. You can't locate the gunshots anymore. There's no cops anywhere. It's a total free for all.

43:32 But now that the Democrats are in town, it's gonna be a clash between these young radicals. They kind of fond of the hostile environment of the city of Chicago versus these Democrat elites. So it's like we talked about in the last one, it's this house of cards coming down all around them. They just really can't-. I agree. So now looking at Ukraine, I'll give you my tag and then you give me yours. But Two years into Ukraine Russia had won everybody learned that basically the last has started the war ten years ago It's all falling apart. And so they go. What do we do? Well, we'll just start a war and a

CHAPTER 11 / 22 Discussion

Global Conflict Overstretch, Israel-Lebanon War, and Multipolarity

The American empire is described as overstretched across multiple fronts, including Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan. Predictions suggest Russia will seize the Black Sea coast, while Israel faces a war in Lebanon against Hezbollah that it cannot win. These events are framed as the definitive end of American hegemony and the transition to a truly multipolar world order.

gaza· taiwan· hezbollah· xi jinping· black sea· iran

44:25 That's what I see, but then the social capital Israel lost. I don't have some fetish of hate of Israel. It's like I don't hate the US government. I don't hate the Jewish people, but I don't like Israeli government. It's another corrupt kleptocracy, you know, criminals. But just looking at this, things are not going well for Netanyahu. His own generals are saying we can't beat Hamas. His cabinet's resigning. You've got Zelensky falling apart. He's a dictator now, canceled elections, banning all his political opposition, banning the Orthodox Church. You add all this mess together with China threatening to invade Taiwan. What do you see happening on that front? Well, something's got to give. The empire is stretched too thin and there's conflict on every continent. There's the three major ones you pointed out, Ukraine, Gaza, Taiwan, but there's also the smaller ones. There's Azerbaijan, Armenia, there's Kosovo in Serbia, there's Guyana and the Essequibo in Venezuela.

45:18 something has got to give. We are over committed, we're overstretched. This is what happens of 30 years of basically unchallenged American hegemony and we started to believe that we were God. We started to believe that we could do anything. We could fight a hundred wars at one time. You know somehow it went from like we need to fight two to like we need to fight a war everywhere all the time. And so if I were to call it Xi Jinping's term ends in twenty twenty seven twenty twenty eight. And I think that is when they're planning on making their move and going for Taiwan it seems that the situation has become a little bit more balanced the United States is rushed a lot of defensive aid over there and they've been making a lot of diplomatic visits over there to deter any kind of attack. But China's been getting a lot more bold they're sending out more planes over the sky sending more ships over there than ever. And so I think that

46:08 there is going to be a real scenario where it's a full-on crisis, where Russia is going to take the entire coast of the Black Sea. There is going to be a major war in Lebanon that Israel cannot win. China is going to take Taiwan and there's nothing the United States can do about it. And what happens the week after that is people realize the unipolar moment is over. American hegemony is over. The American empire is done. Okay, deterrent is is not real. Rather deterrence is not real. America's deterrent threat is not real. And we're now living in a truly multipolar world. And it's like you said, this war and rush has been going on for 10 years. And that was really the beginning of the end. And what we're going to see within the next five years is the end of the end, which is the full completion of the transition from America running the world to now it's a multipolar world for the first time since before World War One, really.

CHAPTER 12 / 22 Discussion

Predictive Programming, False Flags, and Political Assassination Risks

The Netflix film "Leave the World Behind" and the movie "Civil War" are cited as examples of predictive programming intended to prepare the public for domestic unrest. There is a stated concern that the deep state may resort to assassinating Donald Trump or Joe Biden to trigger a crisis and justify a crackdown on free speech. Historical references to the assassinations of MLK and Malcolm X are used to illustrate the capabilities of intelligence agencies.

barack obama· civil war movie· fbi· jfk· mlk· malcolm x

47:03 So let's talk about false flags. We see Maxine Waters, all the Democratic talking points saying white supremacists are trained to woods are going to kill black people. So kind of governor Whitmer on steroids with the fake kidnapping there clearly they're pre-programming that what do you see in their attempt to cause civil unrest they bill as a as a Civil war slash race war where they had all these movies and TV shows hyping it clearly That's what they think they're saving Grace is gonna be I mean, that's what I see. I'm really concerned about that. I You're right, the predictive programming is everywhere. That Barack Obama produced that movie, Leave It All Behind. It just gets so blatant. Like Barack Obama producing a Netflix movie about Civil War, then you get an actual movie called Civil War. You're going to get a nut job. You're going to get some lone wolf guy.

47:53 His best friend is an FBI informant. We're going to find out he's going to go and kill a bunch of people. And whatever the crisis is going to be, because there's bound to be one with all the tension and all the you know, this crisis that's going on in the country. They're going to use that to calm down hard. And the Supreme, you know, bring it full circle. Supreme Court ruling is going to give them the power to do that, to calm down hard on X, TikTok. It's going to be the end of free speech. and they're also going to use that you know maybe and probably to flip the election back towards Biden and then once you get Biden in it's going to be the January 6 DOJ on steroids just like they've been coming after patriots they've been doing it since Obama the backdoor gun control and all that kind of stuff they're going to be doing that again all over

48:34 uh this time to I think finally put the MAGA movement in the ground and make it so that the only opposition there is to the Democrat party and liberalism and progressivism is like Nikki Haley and Tim Scott. That's what's going to be what remains. Exactly so so my concern is is that the deep state never gives up And that they killed JFK for not going along with him in 63 in Dallas. It is a real possibility they could kill Trump or they could kill Biden and claim a right winger did it to then use that as the excuse to replace him. They could kill him at the DNC in Chicago or right before. I mean, I don't think it is a possibility. I think it is a very good probability that they are considering doing this. Can you speak to the issue of assassination?

49:23 I think it's very likely, I think you're right about that. And the thing is about Trump, you have to realize they have thrown everything short of assassination at him. That's one way to look at it. If there's kind of a escalating menu of options that they could do to prevent an individual man from taking power, prevent this campaign that he's been on, they've done everything short of that. Impeachment, lawfare, they've gone after his family, they've lied about him in the press. They've played every card but assassination. everything up to that. And if you think that that's something that isn't on the table, it's as you said, JFK, his brother, RFK, his son.

50:05 There's a whole host of them, MLK, Malcolm X, you name it. This is something that the intelligence agency specialize in. And when you get these major false flags and when you get these major wars, you also get the assassinations too. And so I don't think it's outside the realm of possibilities, you say. I think it's probably far more likely than most people think. And it's truly a scary proposition because somebody goes down like that and there are going to be riots in the streets. And I think that's why it's very, very important that people now more than ever have to be extremely discerning and extremely careful. And you and I both know the kind of dragnet that happened after January 6th. People, it's not a joke. You know, the feds are coming down on people. They are going to be as liberal as possible when they interpret some of these statutes. People have

CHAPTER 13 / 22 Discussion

January 6th Dragnets, FBI Informants, and Militia Infiltration

The aftermath of January 6th is described as a federal dragnet designed to entrap patriots through liberal interpretations of statutes. The Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot is highlighted as a case where the majority of participants were allegedly FBI informants in command of the operation. Citizens are warned to avoid any rhetoric or groups advocating for offensive violence, as these are frequently monitored or managed by the state.

january 6· gretchen whitmer· fbi informants· surveillance state· militias

50:51 be very very sensible and smart about how they conduct themselves in the next six months because whenever whenever these elections kick up there's always this exuberance there's always this getting caught up in the moment you know this is the language that people use after the fact they say i got caught up i was in the crowd you have to be very on the ball and make sure that nothing like that happens. You were smart and I was smart. We didn't go into the Capitol. We tried to stop people that day. And that's the thing. It sounds tough. Oh, let's have a civil war. Let's have violence. No, we're winning the intellectual war. It is so critical to be on record that we do not support offensive violence. 100% absolutely disavow violence, offensive violence, anything like that. And you're right, it's not a game. And what happens is that you're never going to win that battle against the surveillance state and the military. The idea that a bunch of guys, amateur, disorganized, not that we would ever suggest anything like that, but people that do,

51:47 We saw what happened with the like you said the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot. We saw what happened on January 6th. They know your number. They got the score before you've even incepted or conceived of the thought of something like that. And the only people that that helps is the is them, you know, because you see that all these plots, all these, like you said, this tough talk about civil war and stuff, it only ends up helping the enemy. And like with the Whitmer kidnapping plot, that was half of the crew was gullible suckers that said, oh yeah, we're going to go and show them. And the other half of the crew were FBI informants. I would just say more than half the crew. Yeah, it was, it was like 70% FBI.

52:29 And they were running it too. It was not only more than half, but it was the head of the transportation. They were in command. Key point, they were in command. Right. From the beginning. So if you're in a militia or some group that cares about America, great, that's constitutional. And if you've got some guy trying to train you for violence, get their license, follow them home, read their mail. They're a fed. Yep, all day, every single time. And with every one of these shooters, every one of these kinds of things, it always comes out the week after, oh, you know, one out of the five confidants was a federal agent. Oh, so and so that he was friends with wasn't a former. The whole crew was informants. And you're always a sucker. And it turns out that it only helps them because that is what they use as the pretext to justify the crackdown on patriots.

53:15 It's textbook, you and I have been doing this long enough, you longer than me. But we both know that is literally the textbook strategy every single time. You're right, but the good news is there's AP and two of the three trials, they had to release them. AP admits, FBI set it up, FBI states it, there it is on screen. So that's gotta scare the deep state because we know their tricks now. Right, with social media now and with the kind of citizen journalism that's out there, they can no longer cover it up. You imagine 60 years ago all you had was television and radio. Now people are able to report on this and I think people are hip to the playbook and how they're able to operate. But that's why it's so important now more than ever that people are very, very on their guard about any kind of rhetoric like that or any kind of incidents like this. I totally agree. Nick, stay there. Let's do 30 more minutes.

CHAPTER 14 / 22 Discussion

Nick Fuentes Detroit Event Cancellation, Right to Assemble

Nick Fuentes details the cancellation of his AFPAC conference in Detroit after the venue breached their contract 24 hours before the event. Despite having 2,000 ticket holders, the group was threatened with trespassing and had their equipment locked inside the building. The incident is framed as a broader assault on the First Amendment right to assemble, affecting both Fuentes and other prominent independent broadcasters.

detroit· turning point usa· afpac· first amendment· antifa· charlottesville

56:18 Then I learned your event got canceled at another facility and then you were in TPUSA and they threw you out. I just want to say I like the folks at TPUSA, but they need to get past being scared of the establishment, what they're going to say about us. It shows how far they've come just to invite me. That was them realizing being the outlaw, being the outsider, being the rebels good. I think they should invite you to speak and say we don't agree with everything Nick says, but it's free speech. They should invite leftist on, you know, they should invite AOC there. That would make it more interesting. But talk about the fiasco that happened in Detroit. Yeah, I totally agree with you and I'll speak to that a little bit. So we had our fourth APAC conference planned for last week in Detroit. We took a little break for two years and we came back and we had it all scheduled. We had about 2,000 people coming and it was going to be a great time. We did everything lawfully. We had really nice production. It was going to be a great time. And it was scheduled to be on Saturday, June 15th.

57:18 The day before, we set up our stage, tables, chairs, hung lights on the ceiling, the whole deal. Subwoofers were making the whole building shake. It was going to be great. 24 hours before the event, with all our equipment set up in the building, the venue called us and told us they were not going to allow us to proceed with the event. We told them we have a contract. We paid the money. We have our stuff here. We're doing the event. They called the cops. Cops came and threatened to trespass us from the property. They locked the doors with all our equipment inside. So here we are 24 hours out, we sold 2,000 tickets, we got 2,000 people in the city ready to go and we have no venue. So we made a last ditch effort, we called all around the city, nobody was able to accommodate us on such short notice with such a big crowd and with no production equipment because it was all inside the other venue. And so we wound up giving a little impromptu speech outside Turning Point

58:13 And then we held a VIP event that night with about 500 people and we got shut down there too. So we really got chased out of the city of Detroit. And on that point- And physically attacked. And physically attacked also, yes. There was a security guard at the second venue. And the reason I raise this is I can't talk about it yet. But very prominent top talk shows in the country are being denied to speak in Austin. And they already have venues booked or Tampa. Those are being pulled from major talk show host. So it doesn't end with Nick Fuentes. People need to get this, folks. That's why we have to like stand up for what's happening to you. Because if we let Alex Jones or Nick Fuentes get censored, everybody does.

58:54 It always starts with Alex Jones and Nick Fuentes. That's always how it starts, it's never how it ends. It starts with people like us and then once they set the precedent that you don't have a right to assemble, then they can go after anybody. And then, like you said, it goes further and further to the right. And that's really what it's about. We have a First Amendment that protects not only the freedom of speech, which everybody knows, but also the freedom to assemble. And the problem is that increasingly you're just not able to do that. If you go in public now, and I know this because I've done these things and you know because you've done them as well. You go out in public now and they demand that you have like insurance for your protest. There's this arduous process of getting permitting, you now need insurance. Even though we have a history of being totally peaceful and the left burns down whole cities, they're okay.

59:40 Right, yeah, BLM can show up and they can torch the whole city block. That's fine. You know, no insurance required. We show up to do a peaceful thing and it's this whole process. And of course, it's very difficult to do stuff in public because then you encounter Antifa, you encounter the left. That's what happened in Charlottesville. It leads to deadly fights and horrible situations. So this is about standing up to the bullies. This is the central fight, the right to assemble. It's right there in the First Amendment. Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or the right of the free and with the press the right to assemble for a peaceful redress of grievances. And if you can't do that in public and then you can't do that in a private venue, where can you do it? You can't do it in public because you get attacked and you get shut down. You do it in private, they pull the plug on the venue. And so it's getting to the point where it's like if you don't own a giant property yourself, you're just out of luck. And that doesn't sound like a very peaceful time. All right, stay there. You know what Kennedy said, those that make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.

1:00:35 We'll be right back with Nick Fuentes in 60 seconds to talk about censorship, what's happening in Israel and more. All uncensored, unfiltered. Stay with us. I'd be a man to stand up in the info war and say I don't know what's going to happen at the end of this, but you want to fight, you got to believe you've got one. From the front lines of the information war, it's Alex Jones. All right, Nick Fuentes is with us for the last 30 minutes. We're gonna talk about Israel and the censorship of the ADL. He can go wherever he wants. It's censorship free with defiance of tyranny. But first I wanna talk about myself and get his take on it because this is bigger than Alex Jones.

CHAPTER 16 / 22 Discussion

Lawfare Tactics, Martyrdom, and Transhumanist Elites

The use of "lawfare" against figures like Alex Jones and Donald Trump is described as a political tool intended to create a chilling effect on dissent. The hosts argue that the elites, driven by transhumanist desires for physical immortality, cannot understand the populist willingness to face martyrdom for God and country. This spiritual conflict is presented as the reason why censorship efforts often backfire and embolden the opposition.

lawfare· martyrdom· transhumanism· donald trump· immortality

1:05:42 a concealed agenda. I know that's like a radical notion, but now it's I think it's very uncomfortable. Let me stop because that's why you're so smart. I'm not guessing your answer is true as well. You nail it. It's not me. I'm the archetype. So these globalists think like if we beat him, we beat the whole thing, which they don't. That's the big joke on them. But they just see me as if I magically like a wizard run it all. I don't. It's way past me now, which is actually a great Pleasure actually to know that no matter what happens to me they're gonna lose so elaborate on that. It's like Ben Kenobi you know they strike you down but you still go on afterward your spirit lives on and in these newer generations but that's why it was so important to take you out because you represented this independent voice with a massive listener base and a massive production.

1:06:28 getting out the message and totally defeating the mainstream narrative. And so they couldn't allow that for this election. But like you said, the bigger picture is they think that taking you down is the spiritual victory. It's also a chilling effect. I think that's the other dimension to it as well. And I think there is something real about that because you're right. Exactly. It's a threat to everybody else. We'll do to you. We did to Jones. But I love the fact it's having the opposite effect because they thought we were bullied. We were asleep. Well, and it emboldens people. They think that it will chill everybody. People look at you and you're being made an example of going through this horrific ordeal that nobody envies. I get accused of the same things. People say it's a publicity stunt. Lawfare is absolute hell. And nobody knows that better than you. Yeah, when you were banned for two years from flying, they later admitted it was real. Remember when you first went public, they said it was fake. Later they went, yeah, he is banned from flying.

1:07:20 Right. And now to this day, they say, oh, nothing bad happened after January 6 because you didn't get charged. He was only on a no fly list. You only had his money seized, only got subpoenaed and paid fortune in legal fees. So you and I were on the same page. We know how this stuff works. And they put you through that ordeal so that people look at a guy like you and say, man, I better just save myself the trouble and not talk. I was talking to another friend of mine and they said, well, how could how could Jones have prevented that? And I said, he couldn't have prevented that. It was targeted, it was political. They went looking on a fishing expedition for years to find something that would be the pretext to take you out. And the only way that you could have prevented that is by not speaking your mind and not expressing yourself. And never raising your challenge. No, I mean, exactly. They were off record meetings, but I met with the top law firms about, oh, there's a way to get you out of this. So I mean, they're like, well, we'll give you $50 million a year, just do what we say. I mean, so yeah, exactly.

1:08:15 And that is what they want people to do. They want to show this is what happens when you mess with us. So you better just take the deal and shut your mouth and watch what you say because we're in charge. But you're right. There is a whole new generation that says, you know what? We ride or die with Alex Jones. We ride or die with Donald Trump. We ride or die with these people. They're putting these people up. And it's, you know, I don't think it's always in good taste to compare it to like Jesus, but there is a similar effect of saying, hey, We have to fight for something. We're either gonna die on our feet or we're gonna live on our knees. And we're not gonna live on our knees because all these terrible things happened to Alex Jones or Donald Trump. Instead, a bunch of people are gonna rise up and say, well, you can't sue all of us. The plaintiff in this case can't sue everybody who's gonna go out and talk about every conspiracy that the government's up to. And eventually it's gonna overwhelm the system. And I think that's what you're seeing right now. It's basically like

1:09:12 The genie has gotten out of the bottle and this message that you've got across to the public cannot be reversed. It cannot be unheard. The signal went out. I agree and as long as I'm willing to take the pain it only makes it bigger which they seem to be blind to that. They have a missing blind spot. It happens all the time. It's hubris. It's hubris and it's this fundamental misconception because, and it's so tied in with what you talk about all the time, they're transhumanists because they want to live forever. They have it so good and they're so empowered and they're so afraid of God and judgment and death that they want to live forever. So that's the thing that they're terrified of the most. That's why they want to transcend it.

1:09:53 They cannot possibly comprehend the way that people like us think, which is that we're looking to be martyrs. We're looking to die for something. We're looking to give our life and spend our life on something that matters, like family, like our nation, like our God, like our values. And so that's why they'll never understand what the inspiration is. Because that's how we actually transcend that way. That is how we achieve, that's the sort of irony. The only way to achieve immortality is to die a martyr, to go out like that. And I think that's what legends do. I know you'll be around with us, but what they're doing to you is totally horrible. Well, beyond me, I wanted to get your expert, you're a smart guy, take on it, I totally agree with you. So the time we have left, 14 minutes, 12 minutes,

CHAPTER 17 / 22 Discussion

Israel Military Strategy, Hezbollah Conflict, and Iron Dome

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is accused of prolonging the conflict in Gaza to avoid personal legal consequences. Military experts warn that an offensive into Lebanon against Hezbollah would be disastrous, as the group possesses over 100,000 missiles capable of overwhelming the Iron Dome. The discussion suggests that the U.S. is beginning to limit weapons aid because officials recognize the strategic impossibility of a total victory.

benjamin netanyahu· hezbollah· lebanon· iron dome· tel aviv· iron dome

1:10:40 Israel, totally blown up in their face. They're now turning against each other. I'm not an enemy of Israel, but I'm an enemy of what the corrupt government's doing. It's like I'm an enemy of our corrupt government. What is going to happen with them? Now they want to go into Lebanon. I mean, it's just the head of the Israeli military says we cannot defeat Hamas. We've just made them stronger. I mean, I could tell them that easily. So where does this go? Well, and the same people are saying they can't defeat Hezbollah. So they're talking about de-escalating the fighting in Gaza. They're wrapping up the offensive in Rafa. And as they've said from the beginning, they're now going to rearrange their army and they're going to move everybody up to the north. They're going to finish the fighting in Gaza. They're going to move to the north. And then they think they're going to take on Hezbollah full on. And there was a report that came out

1:11:24 that said by mid-July there'll be a major offensive in Lebanon against Hezbollah. And by the way, 15 years ago Israel got slaughtered fighting Hezbollah in Lebanon. That's right, they fought a brutal one-month war. It was objectively a major defeat. And that's because they relied too heavily on air power. They had that major victory in the Six-Day War and they've kind of been riding on that high ever since, you know, for the past 50 years. But as the war in Ukraine has proved, you can't just win with air power. And that's because of the changes in the technology and the tactics and the strategy. It's all about loose on the ground and the Iranians are tough, so they're just waiting. Well it's boots on the ground and it's a missile game. It's missile defense and it's missiles and Israel is very vulnerable. Their electrical grid is vulnerable, their critical infrastructure is vulnerable. Hezbollah's got a hundred thousand missiles, they got a hundred thousand guys and they can fight like a professional military. Israel's gonna walk in there and they're gonna get slaughtered and I think the big concern on everybody's mind

1:12:19 throughout all these conflicts is nuclear. You know, it's not been too long since the nuclear bomb was invented and used. It's only been 80 years. It's only been a handful of generations. And so the question is, in a conflict with Russia, is Russia's back going to be pushed to the wall and they're forced to use nukes? Well, it turns out maybe not. I don't think we're out of the woods yet, but maybe not. The big concern is in Israel where they're going to bite off more than they can chew because Netanyahu doesn't want to face jail time. They're going to march into a slaughter in Lebanon. Iran is going to counter also. And that's the real problem is Netanyahu is using his sustained power.

1:12:56 Oh, and everyone knows that. I mean, like you say, that's not even anti-Semitic or controversial. It's just, I think even many of the Jews are pointing this out now. Adelson, AIPAC, they've turned against Netanyahu. And that's because he knows that the minute that he leaves office, he's going to jail. And the longer the war goes on, the more that he can defer that until later. So the war must go on. It must expand from Gaza into Lebanon. He said don't investigate October 7th until the war's over. Now he says it never ends. and it will go on forever. It'll go out and it'll go out like a cowboy. I think that's what he wants to do by, you know, making all these territorial acquisitions. But this is going to be brutal. And that's kind of the cruel irony. It's actually a sad thing is that I don't think the Israelis even understand how bad this is. I was reading an anecdote from somebody who actually just visited Israel, and they say that people are still partying in Tel Aviv. You wouldn't even know that there was a war going on. And the news coverage, they don't even want

1:13:53 really talk about Gaza or how brutal the fighting is over there. And a lot of them are so high on their own supply, they don't know that they're marching into an absolute disaster if they're going to fight over there in Lebanon against Hezbollah. And the United States, I don't know how much they're going to be able to help. Hezbollah plans to launch an offensive and bring the war into Israel. They don't want to do the fighting in Beirut and Lebanon. They want to do the fighting in Israel. And Israel is not a big country. So if the fighting is over there in Israel, it's going to go very badly for them. And as I said, So yeah, how do we not push Israel into the Samson option? Well, they have to be restrained. And the only way they're going to be restrained is if they withhold the aid. And the Biden administration and the Democrats, they've been trying to drag the aid a little bit. You know, this senator, I think from Delaware, forced the National Security Council to adopt this memorandum. They have to certify Israel's following international law. And it's not because the U.S. war hawks don't want to kill the Muslims. They know it's not going to work.

1:14:52 Right, precisely. It's not going to work. It's a disaster. It's a disaster in Ukraine. It's a disaster here. And so the one thing that they can do is to just limit the amount of weapons that are going over there because Israel needs the weapons. They need specifically the replenishment of the missile defense. There are three missile defense systems, the Iron Dome, David's Sling, and there's a third one. because they know all these missiles are going to come in and this battery from Hezbollah is going to totally overwhelm them. It's going to blow up all their infrastructure. And then they're kind of done. I mean, Israel is going to be uninhabitable for a long time if this nightmare scenario plays out. So the hope is that diplomacy prevails. But the unfortunate thing about Israel is I just don't see that happening with them. I think they're emboldened. I think they've had it too good for too long. And they're kind of in for a rude awakening here. Well, shifting gears.

CHAPTER 18 / 22 Discussion

AIPAC Influence, Jamal Bowman Defeat, and Foreign Money in Elections

AIPAC's record-breaking $15 million expenditure to unseat Representative Jamal Bowman in a Democratic primary is analyzed as a sign of shifting political alliances. The ADL and other Jewish organizations are described as facing blowback from the "cultural Marxist" causes they previously supported. The hosts argue that foreign money should not dictate American elections and that the right to criticize any foreign country is a fundamental part of a republic.

aipac· jamal bowman· adl· george soros· thomas massie· zionism

1:15:41 to the ADL. They tried to intimidate Musk. They, the ADL kind of comes out of their rat hole and goes back in, but they were out last year. They're kind of back in the rat hole and then they're going to come back out. What do you think they're going to do next? Well, they're going to have to ally with the right wing. That's kind of the, it's such a, there's so many contradictions right now because of how chaotic they are. Yeah, that leads us to Jamal Bowman. Right, right. AIPAC is going up against the progressive squad because AIPAC and the ADL have realized that they've created this monster. They've created a golem in the left.

1:16:18 And it's interesting because a lot of these, the more secular Jews, left wing Jews, they have amplified progressivism. They've amplified BLM and these progressive causes. I was about to say, the only anti-Semitism I ever heard was when I went to campuses to speak and they're like all obsessed with Israel attacking me. Like they think white supremacists are bad. I mean, like the left, it literally hates Jews. How did American Jewish groups fund their own destruction? Like where did that come from? Well, I think that a lot of the left-wing Jews were attempting to undermine what they thought was the big threat, which is fascism. Their mantra is never again, never again. That was the basis of this open society vision. The famous George Soros Open Society Foundation comes from Open Society, which is a book. And the idea is that the

1:17:07 the biggest threats of the Jewish people is authoritarianism, fascism, the authoritarian personality. So a lot of these-. So they ally with radical Islam while they attack it. I mean, that's crazy. Yes, they're allying with all these cultural Marxist causes that seek to undermine the basis of fascism, which is solidarity of white people, Christianity, the nations. And what they get is this vile leftism. It's all about deconstruction and destruction. And now this black hole of leftism is drawing in Zionism and saying, well, you know what, Zionism is also this colonial entity. And you know, there's some truth to that also.

1:17:50 The head of the ADL of Greenblatt on TV like last year and he said it's weird It's like black people and others are at the top and whites were at the bottom and Jews at the bottom of the whites We're not white people. Well, dude, you look white you dumbass Like what? Why did you do you not think this wouldn't the gun kicks as hard as it shoots? That's it's precisely right. I mean, they they do look why they are white presenting and they are just as much a part of the elite, maybe even a little bit more than white people. And the idea that the like the black people would never notice that or the brown people who have been kind of stirred up with these passions, anti-colonial, anti-white feelings, you know, that that would never blow back on the Jewish people. Well,

1:18:34 Well that is now happening and that's why a lot of these, you know, at least nominally, ostensibly, this is why a lot of these big Jewish liberals like this Bill Ackman and like this Jacob Helberg are now leaving the Democratic Party and going to the Republicans. And I think that's mirroring maybe even a little bit what's happening with the ADL where maybe the only reliable base that still supports the state of Israel They're only going to find it on the right wing. They're only going to find it among evangelicals, among white boomers, Republicans. So now we see APAC rushing to support Republican candidates. Some of them, they're rushing to support some and of course they oppose Thomas Massey. They oppose Jamal Bowman and they just unseated Jamal Bowman. They paid 15 million dollars to get him out of his seat in the Democratic primary. And you know the thing is, it's funny,

1:19:23 I say that and everybody says, oh, what are you some kind of progressive leftist now? You support the squad? Of course not. I don't support AOC. I don't support Jamal Bowman or any of them. What I don't support, though, is all this foreign money coming into the elections. And I think everybody agrees with that. Right or left, You know, we can have a fair contest and sometimes the right's gonna win, sometimes the left is gonna win. It's not always fair with the left. But the problem is when this foreign money comes in, this was the most outside money ever in a congressional election. It was the most expensive congressional election in history. And that's because AIPAC poured $15 million in because this guy criticized Israel. And I think that that's part of our First Amendment. It's also part of being in a republic that

CHAPTER 19 / 22 Discussion

Project 2025, Schedule F, and Infiltrating the Bureaucracy

The strategy for a second Trump term involves reclassifying 50,000 federal employees under "Schedule F" to allow for their replacement with patriots. Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones emphasize the need for supporters to volunteer for the campaign and Project 2025 to prevent the RNC from installing establishment figures. The segment concludes with a final push for Dr. Jones Naturals products, including Fiber Green Caps.

project 2025· schedule f· rnc· trump administration· patriots· dr. jones naturals

1:20:08 we as the sovereign people have the right to criticize other countries. And that's all basis of Washington's farewell address. Well, I would say that the most important thing we have another really big opportunity here with Trump to kind of dial it back in 35,000 foot view on this election and kind of the big picture here. It's a very short time between now and the election. I think Trump is going to win. And I'm not optimistic, but

1:20:50 It does still present an opportunity for patriots to get in government and make change. So people need to volunteer for the Trump campaign. They need to get involved in Project 2025. Exactly. We need to all infiltrate the Trump campaign to have control. Right, because you know in 2016 they had a website where they had all the Trump supporters volunteer that they might have a job in the Trump administration. RNC came in and said yeah we're not doing that, we're scrapping that, we're putting all our friends in there. And that's why none of the stuff got done, or a lot of it didn't. We need to get it right this time. So we need the patriots to get in the Trump administration because the bureaucrats run the country. You can become a bureaucrat. Hopefully if Trump fires these 50,000 Schedule F reclassified employees, we could get 50,000 or maybe even 25,000 patriots in the government and we can start to right the ship. But that is gonna be the battle. Whether

1:21:45 Whether we or whether the RNC controls the destiny of the country kind of comes down to this personnel battle that's going to happen during the transition after November. And you know, maybe we're getting ahead of ourselves if Trump wins, of course, and then into his first term. And we could do some historic things with the mandate. If we win that we're going to get, but it just needs to be the right people and the right people. It's two qualifications. Love God, love America. That's all you know, because a lot of people look at me like a hateful guy, but that's my that's my guidestone. It's America first. It's Christ is King. And if you believe in those things, you're qualified. No, I'm doing though. They're trying to bully Americans, conservatives and Christians and whites to hate ourselves instead of even debating their system. You go to the other extreme and that kind of shuts them down.

1:22:31 Yeah, it's like this, you know, they say in improv, the principle is yes and. And I was one of these guys that was tired of saying, I'm not racist. Here's why I'm not racist. Here's why I'm not those things. And I just started saying yes and okay, I'm racist. Now what? Okay, sure. I'm that. Well, now I want to put America first, you know, and so we need to start to get on. I know you got to go, but do five more months. The other side Because I want to talk about the civil war they're planning because that's the race of the soul They've said that do five more minutes people can follow you on rumble rumble comm forward slash Nick J. Fuentes, right? Yes, I'll be there and they should also follow you on X. How do they do that?

1:23:12 I'll be on X, I'm at x.com slash NickJFoyntes. All right, do five more minutes, because I want to focus in on the next 131 days, and then that 79 days between the inauguration and Trump being elected. Final comments, NickJFoyntes straight ahead, stay with us. Powerful interview. Follow me at RALALXJONES on X. We'll be right back. 12 products that have not been available for a long time are now exclusively available at back in stock at drjonesnaturals.com 12 products My dad owns the company. He developed most of the supplements for InfoWars. These are game-changing. They're amazing. All of them are of the highest quality. The Nano Silver Toothpaste and Wound Gel, an Immune Gargle, Next Level Foundational Energy, Top Brain, Rocket Rest, the list goes on and on. But 12 products not available for months and months and months are now back in stock exclusively at drjonesnaturals.com. And one of the big ones is

1:24:10 is fiber green caps. These are the concentrated essence of a spectrum like wheatgrass is in there as well of known sprouts that just do incredible things for immune systems, our health, our energy and for our guts. So it's back in stock, green fiber capsules, a limited run exclusively at drjonesnaturals.com. Check it out today and I thank you for your support. And for breaking news and updates, be sure and follow me at Real Alex Jones here on X. Big Brother, Mainstream Media, Government Cover-Ups. You want to stop tyranny? Well, so does he. Live from the Infowars.com studios, it's Alex Jones. Get your motor running Head out on the highway Looking for adventure In whatever comes our way Yeah, darling, go make it happen

CHAPTER 20 / 22 Discussion

Civil War Pre-Programming, MAGA Extremism, and Social Media Liberalization

The Biden administration is accused of using "Hitlerian" rhetoric to frame MAGA supporters and Christian nationalists as domestic threats. This framing is viewed as a precursor to potential state-sponsored provocations or the invocation of the Insurrection Act. However, the liberalization of platforms like X, Rumble, and Kick is cited as a counter-force that allows the public to see through the "extremist" labels applied by the government.

joe biden· insurrection act· charlottesville· christian nationalism· elon musk· rumble

1:23:12 I'll be on X, I'm at x.com slash NickJFoyntes. All right, do five more minutes, because I want to focus in on the next 131 days, and then that 79 days between the inauguration and Trump being elected. Final comments, NickJFoyntes straight ahead, stay with us. Powerful interview. Follow me at RALALXJONES on X. We'll be right back. 12 products that have not been available for a long time are now exclusively available at back in stock at drjonesnaturals.com 12 products My dad owns the company. He developed most of the supplements for InfoWars. These are game-changing. They're amazing. All of them are of the highest quality. The Nano Silver Toothpaste and Wound Gel, an Immune Gargle, Next Level Foundational Energy, Top Brain, Rocket Rest, the list goes on and on. But 12 products not available for months and months and months are now back in stock exclusively at drjonesnaturals.com. And one of the big ones is

1:24:10 is fiber green caps. These are the concentrated essence of a spectrum like wheatgrass is in there as well of known sprouts that just do incredible things for immune systems, our health, our energy and for our guts. So it's back in stock, green fiber capsules, a limited run exclusively at drjonesnaturals.com. Check it out today and I thank you for your support. And for breaking news and updates, be sure and follow me at Real Alex Jones here on X. Big Brother, Mainstream Media, Government Cover-Ups. You want to stop tyranny? Well, so does he. Live from the Infowars.com studios, it's Alex Jones. Get your motor running Head out on the highway Looking for adventure In whatever comes our way Yeah, darling, go make it happen

1:25:11 All right, I want to be a thousand percent clear before Nick Fuentes leaves us. We're not like some other talk show that talks about crime statistics or funny videos or Republican Democrat crap. We're the zeitgeist. We're what the system wants shut down. So they don't want this on air because we've got their number. Now, it is not even two plus two equals four. It is one plus one equals two. It is just the number one recognizing that they are hyping and pre-programming and predictive programming white supremacist attacks as civil war in the next 131 days. And then they say Blumenthal's introduced bills to pull the power of the military away from Trump during civil insurrection

1:26:09 and the Insurrection Act that George Bush put in 1992 during the LA riots. They are planning that. So anybody saying we're in boring times is asleep or dead. They're gonna pull something big in the next 131 days, and they'll definitely pull something big when he's president elect. I called it four years ago during the 79 days of hell. We had that website that redirected the video. And I said, when Trump wins or when they try to block him, it's gonna be hell and it was. So Nick, in closing, it's not Russia and that war they're going to use. That's part of it. It's not even the dollar collapse. Everything they're pre-programming is race war. Even though you have record numbers of blacks, Hispanics voting Trump, they're going to try to build that. Do you agree with that statement? And then B, how do we stop that? Because speak to the pre-programming. You talked about it earlier briefly and you were on target, but to me, gut level, intellectually, this is where we're at. This is my main focus.

1:27:12 Well, my gut says it started with that Biden speech, which the infamous Biden speech he gave, I think it was in Pennsylvania, with the very ominous lighting in the background where he castigated these so-called MAGA extremists. And basically ever since then, for the past couple of years, I forget precisely when the speech was. Yeah, I mean, he's at Independence Hall with Hitlerian red light, all of it, yeah. Right, he gives the speech and he singles out and excludes these MAGA extremists. He did something similar at one of the State of the Union addresses and he said, well, you know, you could be a Republican, but that's different than these MAGA extremists. And more and more that is

1:27:53 That does seem to be the foil that's being created. That is the cleavage that they're describing is you could even be a Republican. You could be like Liz Cheney, but you can't be like Trump and you can't be like those people that tried to overthrow the government on January 6th. And this has been the theme. It's actually interesting. There was an echo of this In Joe Biden's 2020 campaign, his announcement was about Charlottesville. That was his announcement when he announced he was running for president the first time. He said on Charlottesville, the deadly attack. And when he announced his re-election, it was about January 6th. And so the Democrat message has coalesced around

1:28:29 fixating and honing in on in order to exacerbate, I think, right wing extremism or the threat of right wing extremism, racial, religious, partisan. And so- And they've been trying to bait us, but it hasn't worked. Exactly. And they have talked about white supremacists, they've talked about MAGA extremists. Now for some time the thing has been Christian nationalists. And it's like you say, they're goading the more extreme elements. Although it's never an extreme element, let's just be very clear, it's always a nut job. Like I don't believe that anybody would take it to the logical conclusion of we're going to go and harm a bunch of strangers, you know, for some political project. It's always somebody that has psychosis. It's always somebody that's on SSRIs. They're extremely antisocial. And then they find some antisocial ideology. In some cases, it's white nationalism. In some cases, it's transgenderism. But it's always just some expression of a deeper underlying issue.

1:29:26 And anyway, they find they're not job, they find their person. They groom that person, the intelligence agencies groom that person and then they turn them loose and put them out there to do something despicable. And then they pass the wide net and blame everybody and that's how they shut it down. And so I think it's like you say, they have been trying to goad somebody under that pretext. It's Christian nationalism, it's mag extremism, it's white supremacism, whatever. And they're waiting for that person to do it. But I don't think That has happened. I mean, if you've been paying attention, there hasn't been anything major like that in a long time because it's like you say, they're just not taking the bait. And I think that ironically, the more free that social media becomes, the more understanding there is and the more I think people realize we're not actually extremists, we're not actually violent, we're not actually maniacal. You know, for a long

1:30:16 We're just not rolling over and dying. And that's what X has done. I've noticed drawing all the censorship attacks there. It's freed up a lot of other platforms now. Totally. And some of the other platforms have rolled back their terms of service because they see X is doing well. TikTok is doing well. You know, even these streaming platforms like Kick and Rumble, they're doing well. Twitch, after the success of Kick and Rumble, started rolling back their on I actually think things are cooling down a little bit in some sense, if anything. And so that's why people just got to be on guard and make sure that we don't take debate on this stuff because I think-.

CHAPTER 21 / 22 Discussion

Trump Prosecution Strategy, Deep State Accountability, and Silicon Valley

If re-elected, Donald Trump is urged to pursue criminal prosecutions against high-level figures including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden for alleged corruption. The hosts argue that failing to prosecute Clinton in 2016 was a cardinal mistake that allowed the "dirt state" to continue its attacks. Accountability is also sought for Silicon Valley executives like Mark Zuckerberg and prosecutors like Fani Willis.

barack obama· hillary clinton· mark zuckerberg· fani willis· hunter biden· justice department

1:31:13 Oh, it's undeniable. I mean, there's literally a movie called Civil War, as you know, the A24 movie. And if you watch Civil War, $300 million price tag, it's all white people being killed, Secret Service being killed, Trump is killed. It's a race war movie. And people say, we don't know the message, watch the movie. Again, that's what they're trying to pre-program, but it's not gonna work. What do you expect in closing? If Trump wins, we're actually get him to get good people in. What is the what is the rail of not being vindictive but doing the job we're supposed to? Because we have to shut down the deep state. Trump just can't be, oh, I'm going to leave you there. They'll keep attacking. Plus, it's his duty. What would you do in closing if you were Trump?

1:31:59 And he gets elected in 131 days and he gets into office 79 days after that. He's got to fire every US attorney. He's got like Clinton did when he first got in. He's got to put his people in. Then what do you do to the deep state? I say go whole hog because they're already going to attack us anyways. Let's just go whole hog under the law. 100% and it's not vindictive. You're right. Vindictive is the wrong word because vindictive implies that it's personal, it's emotional, it's vengeful, but it's not. It's punitive. It's not vindictive, it's punitive. It's about punishing these people under the law because they have committed crimes. You know, we went through all of

1:32:36 Trump's everything over the past 10 years with Russia, Ukraine, with January 6th. They couldn't come up with anything. They came up with a bunch of nonsense conspiracy statutes, you know, the classified documents. This stuff is nonsense. On the other side, you've got Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. On the other side, you have the corrupt Biden DOJ. On the other side, you've got Hunter Biden and Joe Biden and their corruption with China and Ukraine and every foreign government. So it's not about revenge, it's about justice, it's about the law. And these people are wrecking our country. And it's about stopping the same deep state from doing it again. It's about survival. I mean, we have to. And by the way, they'll come after you and I for saying that. They're like, oh look, they tell the intelligence agencies, look, Fuentes and Jones are coming after us. No, you came after us, jerk. You literally are destroying, like we're supposed to sit there and take it?

1:33:26 Well, and they started it. Not to be juvenile, but it's true. They made the play to steal America. They made the play to steal our dollars. They drew, just like in the great movie with the great Sylvester Stallone, it was just a masterpiece. His other ones were cheesy, but I get it. He was making money. But First Blood is so good. He's like, hey man, you drew First Blood. That's right, they drew first blood and now it's our turn and we have to set it straight otherwise it's going to be this all over again. And that was maybe the cardinal mistake that Trump made is that he declined to prosecute Hillary Clinton. He said I'm going to appoint a special prosecutor, I'm going to lock her up. And it wasn't about vengeance, that was about, that was criminal conduct, that was corruption. It needed to be punished. You got to shut down a criminal group that's over the country.

1:34:11 100% it's about law and order. Just like it's law and order when you lock up a murderer, you have to lock up these corrupt people that steal elections and manipulate the media. So if you were Trump, who would you, with the Justice Department, who would you prosecute first? I think Obama, go for the head. Biden, Hillary, Soros, go after them. All of them, yes, Biden, Hillary, Obama, Soros, all the major donors. I'd go after all the corrupt prosecutors. I'd go after the people that prosecuted him. I'd go after Fannie Willis. I'd go after the, you'd have to go after everybody. And you have to go after Silicon Valley. You got to go after Mark Zuckerberg. You have to go out with the Cambridge Analytica and that, all that kind of corruption and their data that they steal. You have to go over- And they're all a bunch of cowards. As soon as they see Will, they're going to collapse.

1:34:57 That's right, because they have no will. These people, they live for nothing. They are weak. It's not the deep state, it's the dirt state. They're a bunch of incompetence. It really just takes an iron resolve. It's gotta come from Trump. It's gotta come from his personnel. But we need serious people in Washington to go there to take the country back. Look, we're in a war. We've gotta go to war politically. Yes, yes, and it's a political war. It's a political problem that we have. You know, people always talk about everything other than that, but it is politics. And that's why we need political people to go to Washington and set this whole system straight. And then once that happens, everything will start to resolve itself. You realize so many of the problems are really just symptoms of the fact that we have a very corrupt government that is putting their profit and putting their influence on us. Look at closing, look at COVID.

1:35:46 Millions, tens of millions dead. They wanted to put us in camps. People backed that off. We have, they're not going to stop. We didn't look for a fight folks, but they're not going to stop. Right, yeah, and you know, it's unfortunate because I think conservatives have a very like sweet and well-meaning disposition. Conservatives want to build stuff. They want to farm. They want to do their business. They want to help everybody. They want to go to church. Democrats are the sickos, but we have to, you know, unfortunately, the enemy gets a vote. We're in a war. We got to show up to the battlefield to defend what we love. And why do you think they're in such panic mode saying Trump's going to come after him?

CHAPTER 22 / 22 Discussion

Conservative Disposition, Trump's Resilience, and the Battle for the Right

Donald Trump's survival of intense political attacks has reportedly made him stronger in swing state polls than in previous cycles. The discussion highlights a shift in public opinion where causes like BLM and globalization are losing favor. The hosts stress that the populist movement must keep pressure on the Republican establishment to ensure they do not capitulate after winning elections.

blm· gay marriage· swing states· netanyahu· populism· free speech

1:34:57 That's right, because they have no will. These people, they live for nothing. They are weak. It's not the deep state, it's the dirt state. They're a bunch of incompetence. It really just takes an iron resolve. It's gotta come from Trump. It's gotta come from his personnel. But we need serious people in Washington to go there to take the country back. Look, we're in a war. We've gotta go to war politically. Yes, yes, and it's a political war. It's a political problem that we have. You know, people always talk about everything other than that, but it is politics. And that's why we need political people to go to Washington and set this whole system straight. And then once that happens, everything will start to resolve itself. You realize so many of the problems are really just symptoms of the fact that we have a very corrupt government that is putting their profit and putting their influence on us. Look at closing, look at COVID.

1:35:46 Millions, tens of millions dead. They wanted to put us in camps. People backed that off. We have, they're not going to stop. We didn't look for a fight folks, but they're not going to stop. Right, yeah, and you know, it's unfortunate because I think conservatives have a very like sweet and well-meaning disposition. Conservatives want to build stuff. They want to farm. They want to do their business. They want to help everybody. They want to go to church. Democrats are the sickos, but we have to, you know, unfortunately, the enemy gets a vote. We're in a war. We got to show up to the battlefield to defend what we love. And why do you think they're in such panic mode saying Trump's going to come after him?

1:36:23 Because they know that their time is up. They know that Trump was able to do it the first time. They see that he's only grown stronger. And this is why I think, like you said earlier, maybe they're considering assassination. They've thrown everything at him and he has just emerged stronger. Somehow, he's less controversial, more popular, higher in the polls than he was at any time during 16 or 20, which nobody points that out, especially in the swing states. And so they say, we just can't stop this guy's like the Terminator. You know we're dropping bombs on this guy and he just walks through the fire towards us and they know it's just like Netanyahu that their precarious grip on power is slipping and it's going to be a lot less comfortable when they're in jail or they're out of power than when they were in it. And you know this fantasy they've had about this you know this open market of free movement of goods and people and total globalization. It's falling apart before their very eyes. This rhetoric about our democracy

1:37:17 coming to an end and all the so-called adversaries of the open society, it turns out they're going to be writing the history and they're going to be writing it with us on the right side of it. You know, so it seems like everything that they've worked for for generations is now being undone. Everything from gay marriage now falling out of favor, BLM has totally crashed and burned, you know, this immigration stuff. Even Biden is now having to try and secure the border because it's so unpopular what he's doing. And this is going to be inaugurated by Trump triumphantly returning back after he survived maybe the worst political attack in American history, the worst sustained, most thorough, most intense political attack possibly in the history of the United States or the history of modern liberal democracy. So I think that's the fear is just the intensity and the finality

1:38:08 of the defeat that they're about to be dealt. But it's not a guarantee, but that's the panic. So it's not a done deal. They're panicking. They've still got a lot of power. They may even still be the favorite. I think that if you look at like normal, a normal situation, Trump is probably the favorite. But as we've talked about throughout this interview, you can never discount the Democrats ability to cheat, rig, assassinate, do false flags, civil war, predictive programming, you know, whatever it is, they're always willing to play dirty like that. So that's why we got to run through first base. We got to run through the finish line and really get there in November. I'm an uncommitted voter right now.

1:38:47 I'm not really all the way in it. I still want to see some things change. I think the only way we do that is by expressing our disapproval of what we're getting from the right wing side because what's different. We've got to put leverage on the right wing because we're the populace. We've got to make sure they feel their feet in the fire instead of just letting them sink back into the swamp. Yes, and that's the other part of the battle is it is just as much about beating the left as it is about winning as the right. Because what happens all the time with Republicans is they win the war, but they lose the peace. You know, they win the election, they change public opinion, but then they endlessly capitulate and concede. Just like how we started this interview. Supreme Court is six to three conservative and they can't

1:39:33 rule in favor of free speech. They can't even say the government shouldn't lean on Facebook and tell them to block certain posts. I mean, talk about-. Because there's still that Republican fetish for institutions of power. But if the institutions are seized, it's cancer to give in to them. Nick, this is our best interview yet. We didn't get off on side issues or fighting over stupid factoids. This has been a very important interview. People can follow you at rumble.com forward slash NickJFuentes and follow you on X as well at NickJFuentes. it I feel really good right now. I mean, we're so close to being shut down. The enemy is at the gate. They're constantly attacking every day in court trying to shut us down. And there's the sick part of me that if they do shut us down, people like, oh God, read the news, man, they're everywhere. But people don't think about how powerful we are. Like we fight back, we keep winning.