1:33:39 where we can get populists or conservatives or nationalists in are less countries the globalists control. This is a worldwide war so this is like a risk game. Every country that we can intellectually awaken that can take their nation back is a major victory. Shifting gears the time we have left I know that you've really been talking about the weaponization. It's the same thing in Canada, same thing in Europe, same thing here, same thing Australia. The same tactics spying on opposition, censoring opposition, trying to jail opposition, lawfare. We've been patient zero. Now the CIA, current CIA, former FBI, it's all confirmed that he is who he says he is. It ties in now to information we're getting from Congress that it's not just been the CIA and FBI spying on people, but actually persecuting them and then rigging trials. What is your view on the story that broke four days ago, seems like a hundred years ago, one of the top stories in the country
1:34:31 of this Gavin O'Blivis just coming on and singing like a canary. Everybody's seen the video. It's wild, but everybody already knew it. Now, I do believe that the individual in there was making bona fide admissions, that is to say, statements of fact that he had knowledge of. I will still be reasonably skeptical and say maybe the guy's just on a, you know, desperate on a date to try to impress his date, and will take credit for things that he has no business taking credit for or that he actually has no knowledge of.
1:35:11 Everybody knew what happened to you, Alex, back in the day was not organic. It was inorganic lawfare in the same way that what's happening to Trump now is inorganic lawfare. Someone who's been in the industry for decades and decades. with, you know, you had a nasty divorce, that was about it, but no litigation. And then within a period of what, 12, 18 months, up the wazoo. Trump has been in business in New York for 40 plus years, never any run-ins with the law until 2023, whatever. This year they decided lawfare was going to be the tactic. Everybody knows the FBI. At the time, I thought it was more the Hillary Clinton machine, but it's all the same machine. Deep state, administrative state, whatever you want to call it, the politicized apparatus. It wasn't organic what happened to you. And now we just seem to be getting some of the confirmation that the FBI, we knew that they were in there with Twitter, not coercing them, nudging them, to use the word of the guy in that video, just nudging people to sue, encouraging people to sue.
1:36:07 bringing in a plaintiff. One of the guys that you got ordered to pay $90 million to, the FBI agent, didn't have any family members killed in Sandy Hook, didn't get shot himself, didn't get injured, but he got made fun of. An FBI plaintiff as spearheading this litigation. I mean, what he says is perfectly plausible. It's what everybody already believed in the first place. The only question is, is he a liar who happens to be telling the truth? Or does he actually have information that he's spilling the beans on? What I just can't understand, this is like, you've got this undercover video, the Pfizer undercover video. These guys, all you have to do is take them on a date and they'll spill the most secret of inner workings of these apparatuses, it's wild. And by the way, when the Pfizer video came out and then they took Project Veritas away from O'Keefe, they were so desperate. People said that's not really the global head of mRNA for Pfizer, and he was. Just like Raw Story says, that guy's not really in the CIA, even though they admit he is, he's on their website. That's all they've got is just to deny and say it's not true. This is insane. And the reason I know it's real is
1:37:06 I would take an hour to go through it. I shot a special report this morning. We're going to air the last 30 minutes of the show today at 2.30 central. It's going to be very powerful where I connect all the dots. But the FBI agent never said his name. My crew didn't, never on the website. Didn't know he was, so he sued me. He's the head lawyer of the FBI in Connecticut. He says on the stand, I went over and talked to Koskoff, my lawyer asking, and we decided to do this. So the guy that went and initiated it is what the other former FBI agent, CIA currently is saying. We went and told them, we went and did this. And so here's the FBI head lawyer of the state. I never said his name. He said, I got one phone call asking if I worked for the FBI. Had nothing to do with me. He gets $94 million, doesn't exist, so he'll never get it.
1:37:50 And then he admits he went over to this big Democrat party law firm with a former federal prosecutor that put the governor, Republican governor in jail, who specializes in targeting Republicans. They gin all this up. They have a PR firm, make up all this stuff I never said. They bragged about it. They run two years of news stories, sue me, had me defaulted, claim we didn't turn over evidence, which we totally did. Then the FBI agent brags, we used the evidence to try to put him in jail but couldn't find anything wrong. Everything that guy said matched up with what I already witnessed. And then the judge in the Texas case three weeks ago goes to the movie premiere of the HBO show and is there on the red carpet. I mean, this is just ridiculous. Alex, I mean, I put together a montage of the Trump prosecution, persecution the other day. Like, here are the characters in this play. A porn star, a convicted perjurer, a convicted extortionist, a corrupt judge with family ties to the case, another corrupt perverted judge who posts semi-nudes on a website, a corrupt attorney general who can be
1:38:49 campaigns off prosecuting, an adulterer in Georgia, another adulterer and perjurer and divorce fraudster. These are the characters in this play. It's too unbelievable to be true. You go back to your case, where people think you had a trial defaulted in Connecticut, defaulted in Texas, and then you have a show trial on the damages, where people watching that are saying, how was he even guilty in the first place? Oh, guilt is not a question anymore. That's already been defaulted into guilt. And then YouTube banned comments when 98% were against him. Alex, I mean, everybody looks at this and anybody with half a brain understands what's going on. The problem is people have been brainwashed into thinking they like it. You look at
1:39:30 One of the Trump prosecutions, the persecutions, the E. Jean Carroll, you get these useful idiots, these mentally ill people who can be weaponized and exploited. And then they go in there and they take their lawyers, they go change the laws. They literally changed the law to enable E. Jean Carroll to file a claim against Donald Trump within the new extension of the statute of limitations so that you can get a corrupt DC, sorry, New York jury to just issue willy-nilly $85 million. Everybody understands what's going on. I just don't know how bad it has to get. It's like it has to be someone's father before they start saying enough is enough. But right now, we know what the FBI is doing. We know what the CIA is doing. We know what the lawfare system is doing. We know what the judges are doing. The only question is, when the hell are the highest courts going to get involved and smack all this stuff down, especially in your case?
1:40:17 Well that's right. What about the US Supreme Court? They came out and said you can't take Trump off the ballot when he hasn't been indicted or convicted of anything, of what you're claiming you're taking him off the ballot for, insurrection. But the Supreme Court has still been timid on so many other fronts. They need to take action now. on the immunity front, on the excessive fines front, on the violations of due process front, and that includes you and Donald Trump. And then the Supreme Court comes down, smacks down that idiotic legal theory 9-0, and then you still have the Lawrence tribes of the world and the Judge Luttig, I forget how to pronounce his last name, who put forward this legal theory, still out there touting it. You still have the Jenna Griswolds of Colorado referring to Trump as an oath-breaking insurrectionist on tweets this morning.
1:41:02 I you know, arguably, in my humble opinion, judicially corrupt to the point of election interference judges on the bench, actively interfering with an election. When it came to you also, it was a lesson to the world. If you're going to be seen as an ally to the powers that we deem evil, we will destroy everything that we can of your life. But it's, I mean, look, to hear them say it so openly, it's almost like, you know, they're so comfortable. It's almost as though, like, they're comfortable enough to be having
1:41:46 a gay anal sex in the halls of the senate this is how comfortable they've gotten with their brazen corruption there needs to be some checks and some balances and some judicial political consequences well they're having gay anal sex on the dais on the on the bench i mean up on the desk and it's and nobody gets in trouble You're absolutely right and it just shows how crazed they are. Again, when I was there with the judges, HBO cameras, they're putting on makeup like Ingeroll looking at the camera and smiling to MSNBC. And then the judge was there waddling around in front of news cameras with flashbulbs going off at a movie about her like it's all, I mean since when does a judge go to a movie premiere about her rigging a case against somebody? It was beyond disgusting.
1:42:29 I'll bring it full circle back to why people should care about what's going on in Canada, what's going on in Brazil. But first of all, you should care about what's going on in Canada, first and foremost, because once upon a time we were training Chinese soldiers on our soil for wintertime combat. People might not be so happy about that in America. But policy, ideology and the Overton window will shift down from Canada into the States and it'll shift up from Brazil into the States. You know, we've had our fair share of weaponization of the judicial system nowhere near what we have in the states. But it is, I like the analogy of the game of risk, the game of war, like getting surrounded, it trickles in slowly and then it trickles in all at once. But what happened with the judicial system in the states, it is enough to make Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin say, my goodness, even we're not that brazen over here.