Top Attorney Exposes Globalist Legal Warfare and How to Fight Back

00:00 All of these January 6 claims for the most part are based on a made up application of the obstruction statute. Because here's the other dangerous place they're going. They're saying if you do anything that in my mind makes it more difficult for me to do my job as a congressman, I can now send you to prison for 20 years. Because that's their assertion. And that's why they're setting up police departments. No, they're announcing their power and exercising it. Like you said, the old Mexican saying, Constitutions are made of paper, but my knife is made out of steel. Exactly. And it was the reason why many great rights in the Mexican Constitution that have been dead letter law from the time they were put on the Constitution parchment itself. So all of it is dangerous because this is just power grab after power grab after power grab after power grab. And they're trying it in place after place after place. So we're going the way that every other great republic fell. Can we save ourselves or are we just going to be

00:51 worse than Mexico in five years. It's going to require ordinary people continue to do it, to fight in the courts of law, fight in the court of public opinion. And that that pushback is what they didn't expect. They have never lost this many vaccine cases ever. In fact, they had the whether it was a state government, federal government, whether it was private enterprise, had never lost a vaccine mandate case at this scale in history. And now they've lost more in two months than they'd lost in the 200 years prior. Don't miss out on the chance for portable, affordable, and tasty energy whenever you need it with TurboForce. Now 40% off free shipping and double Patriot points at InfoWarsStore.com. All right. Robert Barnes is in studio. He came to Texas to file the suit that he first broke here on air months ago before it even hit the news.

01:42 with a major FDA whistleblower that has also been interviewed by the British Medical Journal and confirmed that they suppressed evidence of massive adverse reactions and deaths and then passed on the data that had been filtered to the highest levels of the FDA. Well a federal court ruled Last week they had to start releasing 500 pages a month of the hundreds of thousands of pages that they're saying will take 50 plus years to release now. So in a way the court gave what they wanted. They said give us 50 plus years to release it, 55 years. They said no, you got to start now, but it will actually take strangely enough 55 years. I've got the articles right here to do it. So in a way they kind of

02:25 It's like in fables, you ask a genie for gold, you better ask for it 10 feet in front of you because it'll drop the ton of gold on top of you. So they said, let us wait 55 years. They said, okay, but you got to start now. Well, the first 30 pages came out as many of you know, on Wednesday, devastating information, just hard to even believe. And we went over that in great detail. Finally, there's some news articles about it two days later. Do you think I'm excited that this broke on Wednesday and then almost no one else covered it, made me physically ill? Finally, last night and today, a bunch of articles finally. We'll show you some of those, but this is just earth shaking. It makes me catch my breath. It makes me start having an anxiety attack because we know that there's children everywhere with Obama and Fauci at the elementary schools helping inject the children with something that is so damn deadly.

03:19 So it's very fortuitous that Barnes is here. There's been a new development with the Tennessee court. The courts are very active right now. So new info has come out of a better way to file. So he's filing next week now in this huge case with the whistleblower. But it's on record that's happening. But Barnes, wow, what a time to be alive. I mean, this is if you wanted to be villains, Bill Gates and Fauci couldn't script something better where no matter what they do or how much censorship they pull, they are the new definition of the devil. They are the new Hitlers. Well, I mean, yeah, it's extraordinary and the kind of power that they're trying to assert. And the one thing that we're seeing that's good is we're seeing courts push back on the attempt to basically recreate an emergency exception of the constitution. The old Weimar constitution of Europe was considered the greatest constitution of Europe at the time. Yet it led to the rise of the Nazis, even though the Nazis never obtained majority support from the German public. When Hitler ran for president, he lost by 20 plus points.

04:12 How did they seize power? They seized power because there was an emergency exception written into the Weimar Constitution. Well, the Biden administration has essentially tried to do the same thing, write an emergency exception into the OSHA rules to mandate the vaccine, an emergency exception. And slow down on this, this is important. Everybody's seen the Tom Cruise movie, it's very historically accurate. Valkyrie, they then tried to still use that emergency provision to get rid of Hitler. So Hitler used it to become a dictator with the Reichstag fire and then the German high command knowing that Germany was going to lose and tens of millions were going to die, which did, they tried to assassinate him using that plan but it failed. I mean it's recognized now as the greatest problem with the Weimar Constitution and with any kind of constitutional government is if there's any emergency exception you have no rights.

04:54 Third world countries always get overthrown. Absolutely, and it's the old Mexican saying that you know, Constitution made of paper, blade made of steel. And the net effect of this has been that our Constitution deliberately chose to never have an emergency exception in it. Even though at the time of the founders, there were pandemics every other year during the revolutionary era, the reason why there was no pandemic exception is because there was no emergency exception, because any emergency exception would swallow the rule. But what has happened historically, governments in the US have tried to use emergency exception to do the detentions of people based on their ancestry in the case of the Korematsu case, use it to do vaccinations under Jacobson, use it to do forced sterilization and eugenics in the 1920s.

05:35 And the Biden administration has reopened that can of worms by trying to create, find everywhere in the law. Let's be clear, they're taking old eugenics law that was the model from America for the Nazis and bring it back and they're citing, you warned about Amy Coney Barrett when she was getting confirmed, she cited the damn case. Yes. that the Nazis cited at Nuremberg saying, don't put us in prison, we have this case. Exactly. I mean, the Jacobson decision was basically an exception to the constitutional rights and remedies that existed. It was used as the basis to do forced sterilization, then use the basis to do forced detention camps. And what the Biden administration has done is they've tried to create, there's an emergency exception for OSHA safety rules. They use that to try to mandate the vaccine in that context.

06:15 They claimed an emergency exception for the CDC to grab all the housing Exactly. They use the emergency exception as well to claim that they could mandate through Medicare and Medicaid every health incident Every health group in the country was going to have to mandate vaccines then they used in fact You look at the safer task force committee. There's a good case by the American first legal foundation They brought in DC where what has happened is They used a committee, the Safer Task Force for Coronavirus. It's supposed to be a labor council for longshoremen. They took the labor council for longshoremen and converted it into the Safer Task Force to mandate vaccines on everybody. Then, last but not least, they're using the Emergency Use Authorization

06:57 statute which was for release of a special immunizing or therapeutic drug if a biologic agent was released during war. They're using that same emergency... They're using nuclear war, bio war, end of the world provisions. Exactly. To now mandate the vaccine for children. And so the suit we are filing here in Texas that I talked to clients and they signed up this week to add to the suit is parents who are concerned of the misuse and abuse of emergency powers to inject their kids with an experimental drug that the kids don't need that is uniquely dangerous to the kids for a virus that is not unique to them. So World War III, end of the world, breaking case of nuclear war, bio war, emergency is being used here. And people need to know when they see Kramer on TV or they see all these people saying, let's just have the military go door to door. It's been done before. No, it hasn't. It was done in very select areas against poor people and black people and stuff like that. And it never got off the books.

07:52 But people stopped doing it. So just because there's some evil ass law still on the books doesn't mean we follow it. The way to think of it is these are all martial law type provisions. These are provisions meant to only break in case of emergency. And what's happening is here we are almost three years now into this, and they're still using the same emergency excuses for extraordinary legal provisions to mandate that people take the whether it's the OSHA rule, whether it's the Medicare rule. And obviously it was a permanent emergency. Now people get it. It's never going to stop. Oh yeah, exactly, because there's going to be a new variant every other six months. Can you believe Germany says February 1st forced injections begin? Exactly. Door to door. That's going to be explosive. And it's going to be constant. All these people who got the vaccine who said, okay, at least it won't be a problem. Even Jordan Peterson said he made the mistake of getting it thinking they'd finally leave him alone. Now they're going to be booster shots over. In fact, employers are now already starting to announce that if you to be fully vaccinated, you now have to go get your booster shot.

08:46 Well they've officially said a year and a half ago, Gates said, oh this is every quarter you get a shot. It was always baked in. It's going to be permanent. And then sooner or later it's what else do they need to put in your body for the purposes of health or security or safety. Well they'd have the Omicron vaccines magically ready. Yeah, exactly. And it's going to be constant. There's going to be new booster shots for each new variant. And even though it won't really work, they can't test it effectively to do so. And the data and information that's now coming out, we also are looking at suit for our whistleblower because they lied about where she worked. The people that she worked for claim she didn't work for them. And yet we have the emails, the documents, the British Medical Journal confirmed it. There's a lot of fraud involved. They're willing. Why would they go to such great lengths to pretend that this whistleblower blew the whistle on the complete lack of safety and efficacy in the vaccines for COVID-19? Why would they pretend she wasn't even working for the COVID-19 Pfizer clinical trials?

09:35 I mean unless... Because this is what criminal organizations do. I mean this is Lex Luthor crap. It's because of what she knows is so damaging and so damning that they had to lie about her working there. So we're gonna bring suit against the people there and one of the PR... We're gonna sue people individually who were part of it. So a lot of these publicists are used to being able to lie for their clients without individual consequence and there needs to be individual consequences. So... What... We're gonna go over this when we come back but what do you make of the the illegally violating the advertising rules. Both the Sesame Street did this, CDC did this, FDA did this. And you said that when you were on two weeks ago. Exactly. And you look at the detail. I was going through all the different laws, and the laws require that they disclose this information. That anything that's, any adverse side effects, it has to be disclosed in any advertising or promotion of any drug, period. And here the people violating these laws

10:45 are the FDA and CDC themselves, because they're the ones putting out information about this vaccine that is mislabeled the vaccine. It's mislabeled as a vaccine in the first place. We're going to be challenging that as well and adding that to the suit. It's just a tissue of fraud. What do you call something when every, it's a giant complex house of mirrors? I mean, well, it is such a, well, what webs we weave when first we set out to deceive. All right, we're gonna get into January 6th. We're gonna get into Ghislaine Maxwell case and how they're really controlling that. The judge said, oh, nothing lewd or upsetting to the public can be seen. Oh, for the children to not hear about children being raped, we're gonna cover it up and keep it to only a few people. That's coming up next segment, but Barnes,

11:30 Twitter slaps unsafe label on American Heart Association mRNA vaccine warning. Our own Greg Reese's report showing the new variant garbage got censored by Vimeo saying, oh, the UN, the WHO says this is inaccurate. Just even if he was lying, which he's not, the UN's in charge? Is YouTube now presuming to be in charge of science? Big article on Infowars.com by the Brownstone Institute. that details all of this and lays it all out. And they are now big tech telling you what is science and what isn't. FDA expedites review process on Omicron vaccines and drugs. Oh, they're gonna come up with whole new things, they claim. Soon as it's authorized, even by emergency, now you gotta take it. Soon as Biden says, hey, it's authorized for children, the next day, well, your child has to take it. Manchin joins GOP Everton, nicks Biden's vaccine mandate for large businesses. That is good news. Manchin's getting better and better.

12:25 Infowars interviews Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on COVID tyranny. A big exclusive long powerful interview with Robert Kennedy Jr. whom I'm just really admiring. He's doing such a great job under massive attack for telling the truth. He is really a champion. Need to pray for him. Big interview at Band.Video. Hope you share that. Legal victory. Court upholds Texas ban on school mask mandates and so much more. Also big news breaking over Gateway Pundit, more scientists and journalists exposing that all these studies indicate COVID-19 is a designed bioweapon with a toxic structure that may be replicated in vaccines. No, it's not maybe, it is. Daily Mail, AstraZeneca uncovers trigger of blood clots after its jab. Oh, they now admit it. And Biden unveils a plan to forcibly inject the world. That's here in America. Spanish investigation finds vaccine passports have no impact on infection rates.

13:25 And look at these, martial law in Germany, Merkel to enforce lockdown for unvaccinated and they go on to report the articles, force injections start February 1st. Wow, we could be talking a lot about that. New York City mandates five and up, take the shot. See, oh, now they're authorized, now they're mandated. Robert Barnes, finish up getting into the suit you're now filing next week. Some of the other suits you're involved in, the big court battles that are happening, a lot of defeats for Big Pharma and the Deep State. I think part of Omicron being released wasn't just to smoke screen the CIA pedophile rings, we'll cover next segment, but also to smoke screen all of this information coming up. Yeah, I mean, I think, well, finally courts are stepping up because it's so excessive and so egregious and so over the top.

14:13 to say that you can have an emergency right to using the emergency declarative controls of OSHA, which is supposed to be about something happens at a particular plant or in this context, whether it's a bioweapon or something else. A nuclear plant blows up, you can declare an emergency in the area. Exactly. You don't just declare an emergency because Fauci cooked a virus up. Precisely. Or you have something go wrong in some place, a tornado hits a chemical factory, something like that. That's what the emergency rules are designed for. They haven't even used them in 30 plus years. And now they're using those to mandate a vaccine on over 100 million plus Americans. Then they take each thing, they have regulatory control over Medicare and Medicaid. The law specifically says you cannot use this to dictate terms of employment or try to practice medicine. And what do they do? They use it to dictate the terms of employment and try to practice medicine because that's what this is. Requiring someone to get a certain medical treatment is effectively the practice of medicine and has been considered as such.

15:06 part of a suit that's pending in South Carolina. Exactly. It's like Biden's our doctor, Fauci's our doctor, Bill Gates is our doctor. They don't even see us. They just say, I don't care if you have immunity, you'll take this. Exactly. And so the courts have finally stepped in and said no to that. The Fifth Circuit ruled it was invalid. The Sixth Circuit is considering it now for all the circuits. Then on top of that, the federal court in Louisiana said this didn't have any basis. And here's the other thing that's good about all these court cases. They're actually finally putting the test of evidence to the claims made by those who support a vaccine mandate. And what has happened throughout this entire pandemic, policy, public health interventions, is that when they face judicial scrutiny, when they face evidentiary scrutiny, they fail. And that's what happened. and

16:06 vaccines as they always have. We've never had a successful coronavirus vaccine in over a century of trying. There's gonna be no such success here. More courts are recognizing that the evidence doesn't even support the very thin predicate by which they use these emergency powers to ram this down the American public. And now we're seeing additional examples of it. You go back to the advertising. What is FDA? FDA historically was a labeling agency. FDA was not a practicing medicine agency. It was supposed to be somebody to make sure that your green beans are actually green beans. It was back in the 19-teens and 1920s when people were mislabeling one kind of meat as another kind of meat. It was there to verify that instead of somebody giving you corn syrup, it was really honey.

16:47 Exactly. It was just to verify that what is in this container is what they say. Precisely. What it never was supposed to be is... Now, oh, it's secret, you can't know, oh, secret government agreements. These aren't really scientists either. I mean, this is not some master super scientific super medical institution. That's not what they are. These are bureaucrats. checking labels. But one of the things they are supposed to do is make sure the label matches the advertising. So what you're talking about there is when the American Medical Association simply points out what is required to be in the label and what is required to be in the label for these gene therapies disguised as vaccines is the risk of myocarditis, the risk of pericarditis because it is so substantial, so substantiated, seen so repeatedly, we see it in athletes

17:30 literally dropping dead around the world right in front of our eyes on camera or suffering severe health consequences live at a rate we've never seen before. And who is the biggest risk factor? Young men for these heart problems from these vaccines. And just going back to what you were just talking about, about the American Heart Association and other U.S. senators being censored saying, well, the W.H.O. doesn't agree with that. Why don't the senators, the house members and the American Heart Association and others get mad as institutions and say what is the UN doing saying the American Heart Association can't point out that on these vaccines there's been a warning. I mean that's like why can't the American Heart Association say blood's red.

18:09 Well, blood's really red, but you're not the UN, so you're not allowed to say it. What's amazing here is the law actually requires that to be disclosed. The law requires all of the side effects to be listed. The law requires all the risks to be highlighted. So why such an insane hubris and arrogance? I mean... Well, because the truth will set ordinary people free, but the truth will be a problem for those people who are trying to force this down everybody's throat. So this is all desperation. So why did they launch such a desperate operation? Because if I wanted to destroy myself, I was the power structure, I would start a fight like this. I think there's probably a lot of reasons for their motivation. But look at their history. Historically, nobody's meaningfully fought back. Historically, most people have fallen. So psychos always go too far. They always in criminology just

18:52 And historically, it's like when psychopaths call the police department up, I'm gonna kill tonight, you can't stop me. They just get reckless and more reckless. Completely. And historically, they have known that a lot of people around the world won't fight back. I mean, when eugenics came through in the beginning of the 20th century, very few people fought back. Connie Buck didn't even have her own lawyer. It was a lawyer working for the other side in secret. So, I mean, the ordinary person usually, in Korematsu, a few people fought back and they lost. So the system is used to winning and prevailing under these circumstances. So that's why, and they just see a bunch of people they think are weak, so why not kill us? Exactly, just run them over. And they're used to it working and they are surprised at the degree of pushback, and when they get pushback, what do they do? They become more and more desperate. Ha ha! Like Hitler and his bombing campaign of England that turned the Brits towards war. Ladies and gentlemen, we are back live. I'm Alex Jones, your host. Very, very honored to be here.

19:40 Robert Barnes riding shotgun with me. I don't like to make myself the subject of the show. It's just the enemy always does that. It's all over the news. Here's the headline on a Gateway Pundit. January 6th committee chairman, Benny Thompson says, if you exercise your constitutional right by pleading the fifth amendment, you're guilty. That's coming up next hour because this affects all Americans and in the civil suits from the Democratic Party against us, they've said we're defaulted. And that violates the seventh amendment completely on its face. So this is the real tyranny going on. And the incredible part is Owen Schroeder was never subpoenaed. Owen Schroeder was never deposed. He was deposed yesterday after he's defaulted.

20:28 And how do you do that? No one's ever even heard of anything like this. They just do it, folks. That's why I go before that committee and tell the truth about what we did. It's all on video. It's all on record. We had a bunch of rallies in D.C. in the months preceding it. We went there to try to get them to have a 10-day investigation. And if I say the sky was what color was the sky that day, Mr. Jones? Well, it was kind of gray and blue with some clouds and cold. Well, I thought the sky was purple. Way off at the edge of my binoculars, I can see a little purple spot. Five years in prison, sonny boy. And so they've got ongoing criminal investigations hovering around this. We'll hit this next hour, but just a couple minutes on this, Barnes, and we'll get into the Ghislaine Maxwell cover up and what's happening there in the new CIA child trafficking and where they admit it's going on. But what would you call this period? Just martial law?

21:21 Yeah it is. I mean it's de facto martial law because it's using all the emergency powers, it's weaponizing the criminal justice process. I mean right now for example they're going after everybody who did anything involving challenging the elections including going after the lawyers. So, I mean, the story leaked, it's clearly a green... Oh, they're saying in these subpoenas that there's no attorney-client privilege. Exactly. And they're doing a criminal grand jury investigation right now of everybody who donated money to Sidney Powell or to defend the Republic or to General Flynn. I mean, that came out of the Washington Post and it's coming clearly from U.S. attorney circles. And think of the chilling effect there. Complete... And this is the... Why is D.C. the middle of this? Why is the Southern District of New York always in the middle of this? Why do these two offices have such

22:01 control over people that don't mean Sidney Powell lives in Texas. She's not from she's General Flynn isn't political commissars. They're black holes exactly I mean there are nothing more than Soviet Stasi style police and Soviet and Stasi style prosecutors using the same methods and the same methodologies as those I've told people right now for example What January 6th offended can you get an impartial jury trial in the District of Columbia? That would be like expecting Martin Luther King to get a fair jury trial in front of an all-white jury in 1950s Birmingham. It's not going to happen. So it's the same problem. In fact, I mean, Richard Barris, to his credit, has done the polling data that substantiates this. People should be looking and moving to transfer various proceedings.

22:43 But this illicit effort to comment on Fifth Amendment rights that you're seeing a congressman do is exactly what they tried to do in the Rittenhouse case. They tried to, the prosecutor, Littlebinger, tried to illicitly comment on Kyle asserting his Fifth Amendment rights prior to taking the stand, which was a patent violation and as the judge, to his credit, said, was a violation of 50 years of law. And here you have a congressman doing the same thing. Exactly, when the judge goes, hey, wait, you just probably crossed the line. on one of the biggest violations you can do claiming someone's a criminal if they declare their fifth. Did you just do that because I'll mistrial you right now. But because everybody knows you don't do that. So what do you make of him? We'll play it next hour on TV saying Alex Jones is a criminal if he declares the Fifth Amendment. I mean it's a patent violation of the Fifth Amendment. It's important to recognize the Fifth Amendment applies to everybody. So all government actors cannot take

23:32 cannot elicitly comment on the Fifth Amendment. to even make a proper objection to. I mean, I remember when the Senate Intelligence Committee was investigating clients of mine and I objected on various constitutional grounds, they ultimately backed off. That was a problematic committee in terms of their activity. This committee shouldn't even exist. It's made up by Congress not to do legislation, but to do political witch hunt activity. And the few Republicans on the committee are neocon thoroughbreds. Exactly. They're not appointed by the regular constitutional process.

24:18 by which Congress establishes its own rules. So these are illicit subpoenas, illicit summonses. This is an illicit attempt and now illicit commentary in violation of people's Fifth Amendment rights. We'll hit it more next hour. You're just like me, we're getting into it now. Let's shift gears into Ghislaine Maxwell and that trial and Comey's daughters, the prosecution, they're very narrow. I mean, you talk about the fix being in, they are just like Epstein got his neck broken in three places. I mean, they are breaking America's neck right in front of us. The whole goal of the prosecution has been to use this case to limit the scope of inquiry to make sure Key names like the Clintons and others were never brought up to make sure that how Epstein got his money, which has never been explained, never comes up. Instead, that Robert Maxwell's name, the father of Ghislaine Maxwell, never comes up. The history of all the different intelligence agencies connected to her and her father and Epstein never come up.

25:11 In fact, that's what the prosecution has done. They're keeping it very limited. They're making it sound like the only person who ever victimized any of these individuals was just Epstein, not all of his pals and buddies. I forget the exact quote we covered a few days ago, but when the trial started, the judge said, anything that's lewd or bad or shocking will be covered up. She said, we're not going to let anything shocking come out. You did this. They're raping children. They're running sex slavery. I'm sorry, everybody gets to hear about it. They're filming the trial inside the courtroom, but they're only allowing other people at the courthouse to watch that video trial. Why not let the entire world have public access to the trial to see what's really going on, to see what's really happening, to see what the evidence really is? They don't want that to happen. I mean, isn't this judge by doing this who just got nominated by Schumer for appellate court?

25:58 And if you cover up something, don't you become a party to it? Well, it goes back to remember the Pentagon Papers case. Remember what happened? The federal judge, the Nixon administration was secretly talking to him behind the scenes, saying they would make him head of the FBI or whatever else he wanted as long as he made sure that he convicted Ellsberg. So is it really a coincidence that's right on the eve of this judge handling this trial, all of a sudden the Biden administration says, hey, we'll make you a prestigious second circuit judge. But after the trial is over? I mean, it looks like a quid pro quo. And Ellsberg did the right thing because he's at the Pentagon and they're going, the war is unwinnable but we're going to keep doing it forever. And he goes, screw this. We're injecting children. We've got pedophiles running things.

26:37 This is insane. Well, I mean, here's what's amazing. How is it given the tight ties between Bill Gates and Bill Clinton and these other people with the Epstein's that Bill Gates his name has not come up at all, but Donald Trump's name has come up like five times. It tells you how the Southern District of New York's entire objective was to manipulate these proceedings so that key Democratic allies would not be exposed for their long history of misconduct and personal malfeasance. in this precise space. And that's why this sex trafficking ring has stayed very limited because the prosecution is manipulating the case to make sure the full evidence never comes out. And let's go to this next point. Here it is. CIA covered up staff sex crimes against children, child sex abusers. The CIA avoided prosecution.

27:22 Jeffrey Epstein visited the Clinton White House 17 times we know of and now they found 700 plus new FAA records that don't have Trump's name on it. And I'm not defending Trump, just they keep bringing him up at trial with no evidence. when these guys were all there including Bill Gates. Exactly, the whole goal is to divert attention to make this look like it was a limited deal that it doesn't implicate or it has no ramifications for Wall Street people, for Bill Gates, for Bill Clinton, for a lot of Democratic key allies, Bill Richardson, other people that were known to be very tight to Epstein and involved with him. And notice while this whole critical preparation to end the dollar, bring us on this new currency, collapse the country,

28:00 the trials right now to remind all the thousands that were part of the sex ring, hey, we could burn you anytime we want. The trial's live right now. Exactly. It's a reminder that they ultimately control it, that all these people work for them at some key level. Which, I mean, Ghislaine Maxwell knows that personally because when her father was going to talk, he all of a sudden fell off a boat and drowned. So, I mean, his father was, her father was tied to the Soviets, to Mossad, to the CIA, to MI6. And just look at all the Hollywood people on that plane. I mean it's just big name after big name after big name after big name and yet somehow... I'm really surprised Woody Allen's on there. Yes, I mean it's a, well I can't get into it. There may have been records. A fox is in a hen house. Yeah, well yeah exactly. Woody Allen's on a pedophile plane? Come on, I don't believe that. Or his ex, remember the ex, what's her name? The famous actress, her brother was a long pedophile. It's all a bunch of sick freaks man. Yeah, once you're around Hollywood you understand that culture is just sick at its core. But their ability to keep all this secret is impressive. To have a criminal prosecution that's a show trial that's mostly about what they're not showing.

29:03 Well, they've done a great job keeping it to like the 14, 15, 16 year old young women who are little girls still. But I mean, no folks, they're strangling five year old children to death from my research. Robert Barnes riding shotgun with us. I'm Alex Jones, your host. And we got a Gateway Pundit article right here. I was asking Barnes what he would have hit next. It was this. January 6th committee chairman, Benny Thompson says, if you exercise your constitutional right by pleading the fifth, you're guilty. And they're voting for another contempt charge against another person that's been subpoenaed, saying they want to put him in jail for years over that. On Wednesday, the sham committee reading from the article voted to hold former Trump DOJ official Jeffrey Clark in contempt for defying a subpoena. And here is a clip of what he said on Mr. Manow's show last night.

29:58 and rather than be responsible and answer it, he's pleading the fifth. Now the question is, did you participate in these illegal activities in the White House? As you know, he'd recommended a process by which the elections could be manipulated in certain states. Well, that's clearly illegal, but we need to hear from him Whether or not he said it, we have reason to believe he did. But if he's of the opinion that if I come before the committee

30:36 and acknowledge that, then I have contributed to the January 6th insurrection in part simply because I made a recommendation that ultimately led states to believe that they could overturn the election. Look at what went on in Arizona. Look what tried to go on in Michigan, look at Georgia. We had the Secretary of State in Georgia basically say, the president called me and tried to get me to somehow find enough votes to change the outcome of the election.

31:14 Well, this is part of what we believe Mr. Clark knew about and part of his recommendation. That's why he needs to come before the committee. But if he's saying, okay, I'll come but I'll plead the fifth, then in some instances that says you're part and parcel guilty to what occurred. Okay, so Robert Barnes is a constitutional lawyer looking at that. I mean, I'm literally in this guy's crosshairs. The idea, everything Trump did, Trump listed in the phone call, which they edited but later got released, all the evidence of the ballots they found and the fraud. He said, you know, you found that, show it. You just show the fraud. It's there. He didn't say go find it, make it up. He said, it's there. Just show it. Now it's been vindicated in all those states, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Georgia, on and on and on. We know that now.

32:08 But to have him up there then saying, oh, questioning elections is illegal. We were there protesting for a 10 day Senate investigations in the Constitution that what Democrats four years before called for Barnes. Yeah, there's several problems. First of all, Congress has no constitutional authority to do what he's talking about. They have no constitutional authority to go around and act like they're the executive branch. This is the legislative branch trying to usurp the constitutional authority that is exclusive to the executive branch. In other words, it has to be for knowing where there's issues for the purposes of creating a legal system. If the Congress passes a highway bill and they find out a bunch of it got stolen, they can subpoena the people. Exactly. They could also do so if they wanted to pass a new law, for example, governing that process, then they could. Here, what he's admitting is that they're inquiring as to whether somebody made certain statements that could be used against them for criminal purposes. That is not the authority of Congress. Oh yeah, they got prosecutors all over TV, former and current, going,

33:17 We're going to use this to find dirt on him to indict him. And you're like, well, then just tell him. No, they'll say anything we say is criminal. It is. They have no authority in the first place to exercise just because an agency has a summons or subpoena power, just because Congress has a subpoena power doesn't mean they can. This is like Congress announcing offices all over the country for law enforcement. Exactly, which is what they're doing. Since when do they get a Praetorian Guard? Precisely. I mean, Capitol Police has no business outside of the District of Columbia. So it's a giant power grab. Absolutely. They want a secret police and now they want the authorities as if they were the grand jury. And now they want to be able to refer people for criminal proceedings. So they're usurping all powers themselves that has a name. It's called dictator.

33:53 Absolutely, and it's a power that our Constitution deliberately, as the court in Louisiana just recently said, said the whole purpose of a tripartite method of government is that different branches of government handle those responsibilities accountable to them. That's why our system is way superior than the parliamentary. Absolutely, is that no one branch of government, no one person within government has all of the powers of government. And that is being taken away by this committee. This is an illegal committee that was illicitly formed, illicitly under the rules of Congress itself, illicitly created and is now using illicit power to subpoena people. It does not have the constitutional authority to subpoena in the first place.

34:31 And just to be clear, I'm not even a lawyer and I know all this. You're a well-known renowned lawyer. This is like two plus two equals four. This is like known set law. This isn't like some weird debate. Oh, exactly. I mean, I dare anybody to go out there and find another special select committee created like this that looks indistinguishable from a grand jury whose subpoenas have ever been approved of by any court. They have occasionally tried to do this in the past and each time the courts have stepped in and said no, you have no constitutional authority to just go after and investigate. And you got the head of the committee suing Trump. Exactly. So how are you telling the judge, he's a judge basically, or the jury foreman, grand jury. He's all of it. He's the prosecutor, the cop. How is he then a party to what he's doing? He can't be and that's the problem. And here he is saying he's going to do this solely for the purpose to find criminal information on people, solely for the purposes of referring them for criminal prosecution, none of which is supposed to be within his authority in the first place. And by the way, he's prejudging as the judge now that we have this legislative judiciary

35:32 We always hear about the judiciary legislating. We now have the legislation being the judges. He's saying they're guilty up front on TV. How the hell do you even go before such a monstrosity? It's insanity. And the other problem is that the courts have not been proactive enough in allowing people to challenge these. So when the Senate Intelligence Committee was going after people for similar witch hunt reasons, but at least it was a legitimate committee, this committee was created in complete violation of Congress's own rules for creating committees. So this committee is itself constitutionally questionable and its use of subpoena power completely outside of constitutional authority because it has no legislative purpose. Nothing about this has a legislative purpose. And they're trying to breach

36:12 privileges, trying to breach attorney-client privileges, breach presidential privileges, breach executive privilege, and now they're trying to even breach the Fifth Amendment privilege by saying if you assert it, we will lie about you and say it's a criminal admission to the world. So what is this? Just a gang raping of everything that's America? At this point it is. I mean, and the only question is at what point do other parts of government step in? At what points do other people step in? At what points do people assert their remedies? Well, Tucker Carlson says it's horrible. I mean, who else will stand up? I mean that's the problem. Too much of the institutional media is happy to see this happen because they want it to occur. They think short term they're defeating their enemy. Like if they said about some of my enemies, hey let's just go kill them, I would say no because next I'll be killed. I mean don't they get that? Well they don't. They don't have respect for the rule of law. They believe the ends justify the means. It's part of the whole left takeover of the... Which is why the third world's the third world. Exactly. The ends justifies the means creates

37:03 North Korea. Yes, I mean it's why you know people are quoting various authors from the days of the Soviet Union because their understanding and description of the Soviet Union is more applicable and analogous. Alexander Sholtson Eason. Precisely and because his explaining of that world makes more sense of our world than our own. I was rereading it two weeks ago. It's so thick I only read like 100 pages but it's like it's It's deja vu. Well, exactly. I mean, they lie. They know they lie. We know they're lying. And yet they lie anyway because that's the point. And it was to prove that they can do so. To prove that you will not be able to resist and push back. And that, it's just going to require continued pushback in the court of public opinion, continue to push back in the court of law, continue to push back in the court of politics at every single level and layer we can. Because this isn't a power grab that is historically for Americans

37:51 unparalleled and unprecedented. And that's why it must be fought because it's a threat to constitutional liberty itself, which is ultimately a threat as you note to everybody's liberty. And that's what the gaslighting is. It'd be like if you came home and your wife acted like you weren't there or your husband and you're like, Hey, I'm your husband. We have kids. The kids are like, Hey mommy or daddy. And they're just not, they just, but instead of not talking to you, they go, hello, I'm from Mars. I eat green snails for dinner and none of you make sense. It's like just a weird attack on reality. Completely, because usually it works. I mean, from the old Broadway play, Gaslight, that graded the term. It works to a great effectiveness. And they've seen this work. I mean, I was talking with some of the crew before this. It's like, you look at it, you know, terrorism, war, crime, none of these things got people to forfeit their liberties the way scary virus has got people to do so. It's invisible, it's perfect.

41:52 Not only that all of these January 6 claims for the most part are based on a made-up application of the obstruction statute Because here's the other dangerous place. They're going they're saying if you do anything that in my mind Makes it more difficult for me to do my job as a congressman I can now send you to prison for 20 years because that's their assertion there. That's why they're setting up police departments No, they're announcing their power and exercising it like you said the old Mexicans saying Constitutions are made of paper, but my knife is made out of steel. Exactly. And it was the reason why many great rights in the Mexican Constitution that have been dead letter law from the time they were put on the Constitution parchment itself. So all of it is dangerous because this is just power grab after power grab after power grab after power grab. And they're trying it in place after place after place. We're going the way that every other great republic fell. Can we save ourselves or are we just going to be

42:43 worse than Mexico in five years. It's going to require ordinary people continue to do it, to fight in the courts of law, fight in the court of public opinion. And that pushback is what they didn't expect. They have never lost this many vaccine cases ever. In fact, they had the, whether it was a state government, federal government, whether it was private enterprise, had never lost a vaccine mandate case at this scale in history. And now they've lost more in two months than they'd lost in the 200 years prior. Well, that's the good news we'll talk about when we come back in a few minutes. But yeah, I mean, I'm not lauding the courses. I've been before the rigged ones, but I mean... Why are so many courts saying no to this? Just because it's on its face of fraud? Because it's so broad and two reasons. One reason is it's so, what the power they're asserting and usurping is so extraordinary, so excessive. So courts are a little greedy about their power? Exactly. And they're not willing to let them go that far. The other is the court of public opinion. This is credit to the court of public opinion. So federal court judges may not be, are by definition out of touch.

43:40 But they're not so far out of touch that they don't see what Tucker Carlson says. And they don't see what is broadly within conservative media. And because so many people have fought back, that led to governors and state legislatures fighting back. So a consensus is forming. Exactly. And people on the right now recognize that vaccine mandates are a bad idea, that all these pandemic politics was a bad idea. And consequently, they're getting on the right side. And they're only doing that. I mean, take DeSantis. Where was he 10 months ago? He could have been there early. But they're responding to the court of public opinion. They're not leaving. Same thing with Abbott. Exactly. Abbott could have been there right away. The Texas Attorney General Paxson could have been there right away. A lot of these people were slow to the party, but it's good that they're finally at the party. But they're only at the party because of the willingness and readiness of ordinary people to fight back in the court of public opinion so assertively and so aggressively. The court of public opinion is more self-educated and more self-informed than it's been at any time in American history since the

44:35 revolutionary era itself. What are we going to hit when we come back? There's so much to hit. Oh, I think there's a wide range of it. I think there should be more fight backs on this January 6th committee. I think more lawyers should look at not only contesting it on fifth amendment grounds, not only contesting it on his executive or presidential privilege grounds, but look at challenging the committee itself. Look at challenging whether the committee even has constitutional authority to issue subpoenas, fight back everywhere, every place. And if it's acting as a court, what about the seventh amendment? We'll be right back. This summer, I created a paid for pro video account on Vimeo exclusively for ReeseReport.com. On October 23rd of this year, they deleted my video Pfizer adds dangerous drug to children's COVID vaccines.

45:26 Even though they did, and I merely showed their own documents. Six days later, they deleted, Major government report proves COVID vaccines are bioweapons, even though it's an actual government report. I then received notice that my account is under review. I replied by telling them the two videos are not false and I show all the documents. They replied by informing me that they explicitly follow the recommendations of the CDC and the World Health Organization. I suppose taking down our PayPal and URLs are next.

46:02 But for now, you can still support my work at Reese report calm and in fours at save info wars calm Still reporting for info wars calm. This is Greg Reese So I asked Reese at the beginning of the show when I learned that he got his account deleted because he put out a important piece exposing that this Omicron is not as deadly as they say and it's total hype. They said in the email to him, your video is deleted. We may delete your account because the WHO says, there it is right there. You violate the Centers for Disease Control and WHO. Look at that on screen right there.

46:56 So the news isn't that Infowars got censored. The news isn't that Gregg Reese got censored. We always think about ourselves like how did this affect me? Well I just got censored. No! They just said the UN is in charge and the American Heart Association. Cannot come out and say remember folks there is an increased risk of heart attacks and stroke and myocarditis as is in the insert So be sure you know, they're just they work for the system. They're like hey We're giving you the public posting that you better look out even though they know you're not gonna read it. Oh And the system's like, we're going to censor you when they're part of the system. I mean, this is this is the system eating itself. Well, especially given that the you're legally obligated, both the sponsor and the advertiser under the law to disclose all the risk factors and to disclose and you're supposed to highlight the risks. In fact, you're supposed to do a fair and balanced reporting. Does Twitter make itself a party now to these suits by censoring the American Heart Association?

47:51 potentially what jury wouldn't find them liable of censoring the American Art Association. I mean, potentially, yes. In fact, I mean, all of this is unprecedented, uncharted territory because they've never done anything like this before. They've never you haven't had a situation where they actually have targeted children for advertising that that basically is prohibited most places around the world. Covert advertising that had to pay billions. Remember Joe Camel? part

48:48 poses its greatest risk to people of that age group because it's long tail risk. You have the short tail risk, which we're all witnessing, but the greatest risk of a gene therapy is its long tail risk because we have no idea what it can do. Generally cancer and liver failure. Exactly. How big is this then? I mean, what is the tail? I agree. We've already seen up front, this is really bad. What's the tail look like? Because at some level we don't know of what, will the vaccine itself require a bunch of therapeutic treatment and other medical invasive treatment and interventions? Yeah, they got a backstory built in. Exactly. I mean, most likely that's going to be the impact. And because the greatest- Well, we know, oh, sorry, you don't have an immune system anymore. We've got to give you immune therapies constantly. Yes. And there's more and more evidence coming out about the risk of what this

49:34 spike does and any of this mRNA drugs have mostly failed throughout history. This is now we're doing it on a massive scale that we have never tried any drug in history. No, no drug has been instituted at this level across this global size population on an experimental unapproved basis because no biologic licensed drug is available as a COVID-19 vaccine in the United States. That's still clear, even though they're playing the bait and switch game where the FDA says Well, you know, yeah, we did a bait and switch, but it's up to the government or the mandating agency whether it's actually mandated or not. And then the Defense Department says, well, oh, we're only mandating it because the FDA said it's really the biologic. But even Reuters last week's like what in the world? That was even the headline. Why are you not going to let us see the Pfizer dockets? We get them mass death.

50:24 Exactly, because they've just assumed that the various lies and deceptions and misrepresentation that were exposed by my whistleblower, somehow that the whistleblower can't really be accurate or it was just a one-off or it was just that one place. What she exposed was systemic, systematic problems at the very core to the structure. And that even says that in the CDC documents and FDA documents, which you said months ago, but now it's out confirming what you said. They they filtered most the stuff out. So that's what that's what your whistleblower saying, right? Exactly. I mean what she identified is that these risks were systemic risks and that these problems were systematic problems structural problems in the way they were doing this

51:05 of various COVID vaccine testing. So scary, so frightening, so terrifying that she came forward after nearly 20 years in this industry knowing it would ruin her career. Knowing you have no chance the moment you go public and expose malfeasance and misconduct in big pharma. You have no future in big pharma. You have to take special security measurements when you go public about them. And yet she did so anyway. Why? Because it was so egregious, so severe so substantial and she knew it was across the entire clinical testing structure. And that's what the high ranking people admitted. They said, we can't do anything about this because we would have to shut them all down if we actually honored basic scientific safety measures. So it's system wide corruption. Absolutely, and that means if you can't trust it and if the FDA's response to seeing that evidence was to cover it up rather than expose it, then how can we have confidence in any clinical test concerning anything related to this vaccine?

51:58 We can't. And why do they need 55 years to disclose documents that they said they fully reviewed? They said that they went through in detail, that they substantiated it, that these clinical trials met high levels of standards of efficacy and safety, that they could say with authority that this drug, this Pfizer drug, was so safe they could actually give it a biologic license even though it's not being produced yet. Well if they could do that and they did that within a couple of weeks, why is it taking them 55 years to even disclose what it is they looked at? I mean that exposes that they themselves know that if anybody else looks at the underlying data, looks at the underlying information, they're going to come to the conclusion that this

52:36 this drug, this gene therapy does not meet the standard of safety and efficacy they would want for their loved one or their child. And that's why they want to keep it hushed up. And then we've got the backdrop of the same globalist corporate UN combine of systems. Everything we've seen in Australia is now coming here. Everything we see in Germany coming here, Germany saying martial law, unvaccinated, locked down, forced injection start February 1st. I mean, this is Biblical level stuff, Robert. I mean, you know, it's not a surprise that it's Germany. I mean, they want to put people in camps again. So the I mean, it holds up with that. I mean, I'm part German. What's wrong with the German government? They just can't help themselves. You know, it's like the Dr. Strangelove character. You know, they're just trying to keep my mind.

53:19 Exactly, trying to keep that arm down. But they're so instinctive for it. I think it's the ultimate power grab. They've been wanting it for a long time. The election of Trump and Brexit was a scare factor that let them think that they might never be able to assert it. So they're rushing to assert it, even on the least plausible evidentiary grounds, the least justifiable legal grounds. and the least credible moral grounds. And so what they did not expect, though, was that there would be such pushback in the court of public opinion that they're at major risk in the courts of law now because of the blowback in the court of public opinion. That's what's letting judges take a look at the actual evidence. And when you look at the actual evidence, it doesn't support it. The same reason they have to hide the evidence. Look at this footage of Germany beating the hell out of people to go outside at night.

54:00 I mean, they're chasing people down. Australia, they're chasing people down for leaving the little camps. I mean, it's- In fact, I never got to that yesterday. I've got a bunch of articles where the leftist media says there aren't camps in Australia. When they see people waking up, oh, it's trending. Oh, it's not happening, Americans. Well, Claire Lehmann of Quillette, who's supposed to be on the right, has been coming up with a hundred excuses why the camps aren't really camps and if they're scary but they're not too scary. I mean, it's a reality. What we said a year ago was going to happen is happening. And the only thing that stops it is ordinary people fighting back. And then a bunch of bikini babes are Stockholm syndrome-ing out and working with the camp guards, so now they're allowed to be free.

54:37 All over the world, millions and millions of people are protesting against the UN corporate world government takeover. And I know Rand Paul's had his ribs broken and been shot at with Scalise, but if he would just stand up and expose us and say he was misled, and if Trump would just do it, everybody would line up behind them right now to stop this globalist takeover. And this globalist attempt to take over civilization using fear would be turned against them and a new golden age would begin. But I guess humans have to go through hell first, don't they? Robert Barnes, look, I don't blame Trump. I don't blame Senator Paul. But I know Paul as a doctor advised him, yeah, go with the vaccine. Let's get things open. They couldn't imagine the big pharma would actually put a fraud out and actually create an ongoing crisis. Now,

55:27 Many Republicans get that, many patriots get that. But how do we get Trump, how do we get Senator Paul and Cruz and others to really get on the offense and say, we were misled, this vaccine isn't a vaccine, it hurts people. That's how we defeat the globalists, plus it would make them fabulously of That is now part of official court proceedings. That's not any kind of just claim being made. That is a admission being made by the CDC, an admission being made by the Biden administration, an admission being made by the OSHA administration. All of the government actors themselves acknowledging and admitting in actual judicial proceedings

56:24 that in fact this vaccine does not work as a vaccine. It doesn't inoculate, it doesn't prevent transmission, it doesn't in fact apparently even reduce transmission. It's a fraudulent product that was forced on us. We should be on the offense calling for their political ads. It's the old version of confession through projection. Which is you go back and look at early February of last year in 2020, and you look at what was being said by the government in March of 2020 and in April 2020. Whenever anybody suggested that something might help against any kind of coronavirus, whether that was vitamin C, vitamin D, getting sun, being healthy, whatever it was, there was all of a sudden government attacks and there was PR attacks and press attacks. to

57:24 What they were doing is they were projecting what they themselves were going to do, which is put out a medical product that doesn't work, to put out a medical product that doesn't have safety or efficacy, and a medical product that doesn't serve the purposes it claims to be serving. But isn't that like, I remember when I was a kid, they'd have investigative reports on 60 minutes about Sears auto parts store or whatever it was where the woman goes to get her tires fixed or a carburetor and they would break it not fix it and break more things. Hidden cameras catch this. It's the same thing where they just catch you in this deal and never let you out of it. Well it's an old scheme. I mean the old theory was that you know why do we have wars?

58:01 Why do we have enemies? We need enemies in order to justify wars. Why do you have crime? Why do you create a criminal justice system that creates a permanent criminal class? As Foucault and others pointed out, that's how you create the justification for police. Well, how do you create a permanent police state? You create a constant continuous health emergency and constant continuous health crisis. And once you have the police state in place, it's not the police themselves or the police state, it's the police state. The police are good overall. You can turn the police off to make everybody beg for it. Then you get even a bigger police state that you control. Well, then they're also purging the dissident members of the police and purging the dissident members of the military. I mean, you look at

58:39 It's like panning for gold. They're getting rid of the good people. In this case, you throw the gold away and keep the crap. Absolutely. I mean, one of the suits that I'm suing Tyson Foods, we filed an amended complaint because Tyson admitted that they're doing all of this in the name as a federal agent, as an officer of the federal government. So my allegation is that means they're liable under the federal laws and liable under the U.S. Constitution. And clearly part of what they're doing is if you wanted to punish your political dissidents What better way than to impose a vaccine mandate and fire anyone who doesn't go along? You're basically getting to fire all the NEOs. You're asking all of the people that are willing to take a red pill to raise their hands, and you can purge them from the government, purge them even from high-level private employment. Exactly. It's all a plan. And then society further collapses because you fired most of the good workers.

59:21 I look at the footage out of Austria and Germany of the checkpoints, the martial law and barbed wire, and it just doesn't seem real. I mean, it's insane. I mean, literal detention camps that they're going to protect you from a virus. Exactly. They created Wuhan that that that cannot be controlled in the way they're trying to control it. I mean it's extraordinary. All the studies are out that the lockdowns and the PC all of it does nothing except control us. Every time they've had to go to court on any of these things whether it's masks. I mean they all wear these clown outfits like if I dress up like the devil could I hop around and be the devil? No. Might as well be wearing red pajamas. They wear these little medical clown outfits then they can engage in these behaviors. This is all a Milgram

1:00:00 Experiment. Absolutely. I mean, when you see those kids inside like plastic bubbles trying to do their, you know, part of a choir or a band and they're inside this live plastic bubble. I mean, it's insanity. I mean, it's like, it's like one of those South Park movie episodes where they did that movie where they, uh, they had both people like, Oh, it was a naked gun. Maybe it was one of the naked guns where they're all in like a live condom is the entire body covers the whole body. I mean, it's the, and you have people out there walking around like that. I mean, like this is when all the evidence is, us being together makes us have better immunity. Absolutely. And in general, our humanity is the best of humanity. And yet it's taught people to not interact, not interface, not be around family for Thanksgiving. Oh, I hide all over Austin. And still, it'll be 7am, middle of nowhere, and I'm going down some 20-foot wide path and a man or woman will get up against the bushes like this.

1:00:49 Because they're so scared. Completely! I mean, they've diluted the mind to such a degree of insanity and paranoia that people are willing to take experimental drug after drug after drug, inject it into their body that could change their body structure forever because they're so terrified. Willing to wear double and triple and quadruple masks while running outdoors. I mean, this is insanity. This is the social contract being broken. Absolutely. How do we reconnect the social contract? When we come back, I'm going to show you the Australian FEMA camps, folks. We haven't gotten to this yet. It's all breaking. We're going to break in a few minutes. I'm saying, oh, sorry. I mean, how far do you think they can push this? Oh, I mean, they're going to keep going until people push back. I mean, they're going to see how much people push back. I mean, the only thing that has stopped us or restrain this at all is public pushback. We would look like Australia and Canada and Germany. Exactly. Everywhere where people give in, you see the same program.

1:01:38 Absolutely. And it's only where people push back. People push back in Russia. Russia decides they're not going to do a vaccine mandate. People push back in large parts of Eastern Europe, whether it's immigration or whether it's vaccines or whether it's COVID policy or whether it's lockdowns, and they don't see those policies. Push back is freedom. Push back is life. You would think Russia is not part of the New World Order, they claim they're not, but they went along with a lot of it. They did. I mean, what it shows is Bill Gates understood if he could co-opt the public health authorities, that he could run public health policy without having any control over Russia. That's how you run a real coup. Absolutely. You've got to put your own politician in the trim of the CIA, the Russians will arrest him. But if it's the medical system, well... You just do what Hoover did. And you just do it to every public health authority from the local level to the international level. And that's how Gates was able to co-opt it and dictate policy. And it also enticed his country. He said, oh, use this tyranny. We're not going to attack you. It's not like he hid it. I mean, he did an entire, the whole COVID Panopticon conference that he did just a few months before it was officially released. Event 201. Exactly. I mean, he showed the world. We'll be back. Stay with us.

1:02:36 And we are back. We just got word Alex Jones was right with hundreds of thousands of followers on Twitter. I didn't run it. Don't know who runs it suspended, but suspended means deleted forever in the Orwellian double thing. More on that coming up. Robert Barnes has a lot of inside baseball. He's so often almost always right. He says the Supreme Court is set to reverse Roe v. Wade. We'll cover that next segment. So tell your friends and family and others tune in now. But let's talk about Australia, the beta test for the world. Fifth person this week escapes Australian COVID quarantine camp.

1:03:17 Six months ago I was covering these camps in Australia, which is the model for the world under the UN directive. People said, oh, it can't be happening. And then new videos came out of people in the camps and newspapers here said they weren't real, later confirmed to be real. Because you're not supposed to know what's coming for you next. Let's go ahead and play a clip here from local News 9 in Australia a few days ago when a few teenagers escaped the camp. Here it is. Good morning. We start with breaking news at a Darwin where three people have escaped from the Howard Springs COVID quarantine facility. Talia Saab is there for us. Talia, good morning. There's a search underway right now.

1:03:56 Yes, that's right Davina. Good morning to you. We've been told the trio scaled the fence in the early hours of this morning. Police receiving reports around 4.40am. Now major police checkpoints have been set up around Howard Springs for the past several hours as you can see in these pictures. They've been conducting thorough searches in car boots, checking vehicle registrations, cars and buses alike. But in the last half an hour what we understand is they've actually been dismantled. Exactly why that hasn't been confirmed. Hopefully good news. We're also not sure yet who these people are connected with whether it's a repatriation flight or those Aboriginal community members who have been staying here following the Catherine Cluster. Davina, what we do know is that this is definitely going to bring this gold standard facility under intense scrutiny. On Sunday we had a man escape and found on Darwin

1:04:48 party precinct and this latest situation is only going to put us under the microscope further. Not good news okay Talia's thank you. Oh we're under the microscope without submitting we had camp escapees oh my god it's so horrible. First I reference to site you know they don't use the word camp they don't want to use detention center because they know what all that means so instead it's they fled a site I mean how do you flee a site? They didn't flee the camp. No, no it's a site. Yeah, it's just a site. How do you flee a site? A site is just a location. I mean you can't flee a location. Oh God we're under scrutiny now. Here's another clip. Here is the young woman Australian Hayley Hodgkin

1:05:27 And the media tried to say this didn't happen. They now confirm it's real. This is inside the camps. So what's the go? So this I'm going to give you a warning, yeah? It's an official warning that you have to stand up and obey the rules while you're here, yeah? And that we have to go the rules again. So am I allowed to go to the laundry? You're allowed to go to the laundry but you've got to wear a mask, yeah? Yeah, righto. And you definitely can't go up the fence anywhere else. But you're allowed to go to the laundry, yeah? That's always been the case, yeah? Right, so if I was sitting just here, which is right near the fence, Why are these guys in a cabin that's right near the fence? It makes no sense, does it? Yeah, but you can't leave your balcony to go to the fence to talk to somebody else. That's not how it works, yeah? So if I was at that balcony... Again, it doesn't have to make sense. It is. We always... There has to be lines everywhere drawn, yeah?

1:06:14 And the law of the land is you cannot leave your balcony and you cannot go to someone else. Where it makes no sense, where it doesn't seem right to you, that is the law and that's what the law is there and that's how it goes. The law. There's a law that says that. And look, he's in his clown outfit, his little priest outfit. Oh look, I'm wearing a plastic suit. Highly infectious. When Fauci made it to BioLab. So far, the risk is still very high, yeah? While you're here, can we just do that? Otherwise, the next time it's a $5,000 fine and we don't want to do that. It's a $5,000 fine if what? If you breach again. If I walk out onto that path. Without your mask on, if we don't reason, I will not want to do it. If I cross that yellow line... This is all Stockholm syndrome, all Milgram experiment folks. Look up the Milgram experiment. We could even do that now, but we're giving the warning first. Have a chat with you because

1:07:09 It's a big fine. We're all just doing the right thing, yeah? Rule followers. I don't want to fight with you. I don't want to fight with you. I just want everybody to do the right thing and unfortunately... Take all your shots, have cancer and die. It ends in hell. It has nothing to do with me. Nothing to do with me, I'm just enforcing. So what did that experience make you think? Here's the moment. What was your feeling about being in that situation with those people in control of your every movement? It's horrible. It's a horrible feeling. You feel like you're in prison. You feel like you've done something wrong. It's inhumane what they're doing. You are so small. They just overpower you and you're literally nothing.

1:07:53 So, Robert, this is the end of freedom. This is domestication. This is North Korea 5.0, 10.0. This is North- I mean, this is it. This is the takeover. Well, I mean, actually that was mentioned in the abortion cases of the U.S. Supreme Court that the only countries that have our laws are North Korea and China on abortion. So, I mean, what she said there I think was the most revelatory, which was, they make you so small. And that's their goal, was to make everybody feel impotent. Incapable of making any different to feel small to feel tiny to feel irrelevant to feel they could be crushed at any moment And that's why it's all the small people standing up together that has led to any pushback against this and it's the only thing that has stopped them from doing this on a broader scale and tyrants always have the same song it's not me just do it please I'm here, but he's hurting you. He's enslaved me. He's like, please just do it. Come on, baby. Come on. He even admits he says

1:08:45 the directive, the law, and he puts it in air quotes, in air quotes. He's like, you know, it's whatever the law is today, which might change tomorrow by somebody's whim. I mean, that's what makes it all a joke. And never, oh, they cooked it up. Oh, they released it. Oh, the vaccine hurts me. Never a discussion. Hey, hey, hey, honey, law, it's the law. And how is it being outdoors? There's the evil prime minister of Australia. What a devil worshiper. He's a well-known devil worshiper, by the way, folks. Well, just walking, you know, a few feet somehow is going to spread the virus. I mean, and this is always the, this is their martial law takeover plan. This is the Milgram experiment, uh, obviousness of it. In other words, when you're doing things like you go to Costco and you can't get it, but you go to your local store and you can get it. Only big pharma is open. Only big stores are open. Everybody else is bad. You can see in certain places, but you can't go to church and saying that it magically it spreads. I mean the woke virus and it's magical. It's all just a giant insane power grab.

1:09:38 because they think they'll never be held accountable. Yeah, it doesn't make sense. Yeah, yeah, it's it's it's the law. You know those are air quotes. Those are just whatever their new directive is because it's not an actual law. I don't want to give me a $5000 fine. Just wear your mask when you're in your little cage. Yeah, exactly. Only walk out of here. January 6th attainees that weren't violent because they won't wear a mask in their jail cell. The other thing is apparently if you're going to get your clothes laundered then you can't get COVID. But if it's for some reason other than getting your clothes laundered then you can get COVID. I mean, it's I mean it's like

1:10:22 You're allowed to go work in the commissary, but you can't leave other than that. Exactly. It's doing it in such an obvious way. It's just seeing what you'll do. It's a corrupt evil group seeing if you'll put up with it. It's all about control. It's always been about control and it's overt at this point. It's open. Barnes, what's going to happen to all the leftists that think they're supposed to be rulers over this and they're all earning their slaves? What's going to happen when they learn they've been betrayed? Well, I mean then they get to live the real life experience of a lot of the people that experienced that during the communist rise to power anywhere it took place. Because how many of them... A lot of them supported it until they were inside of it. They're all cheering Fidel until they ended up on the other end of the shooting range. And you know, not on the side of the shooting range that was pulling the trigger. And so they had to wake up to that reality. But what's amazing is history does repeat itself and history does rhyme.

1:11:09 as Mark Twain famously said, and we're just seeing more examples of it, where it has not rhymed is people have pushed back and people have fought back in the court of public opinion. That's what has changed. What is... I just want listeners to get, submission is death. I mean, the only hope we've got, it's not like they're gonna, we submit and they're nice to us. We submit and it's over. Ask Jordan Peterson. You know, that's Jordan Peterson. He took the vaccine, said, hey, just take it, just take the shot. And now he says it was completely the wrong decision because all they did is double down and make it worse. And so even Jordan Peterson recognizes that. If they're gonna run roughshod over him, they're not gonna run roughshod over everybody else. And then it's gonna be more, more, more. You gotta take more, more, more. Exactly. I mean, look at what happened with the, everybody who's union represented in terms of Ford and GM all ended up having to back down because a bunch of ordinary workers stood up and said, nah, we're not taking the shot. That's it. Exercise your power. It's our only hope and it's pure victory. We'll be back, final segment of this hour. All right, coming up, ladies and gentlemen.

1:12:08 We have a very special guest in the fourth hour today. Jason Barmas is always informative. Known that guy 16 years. Robert Barnes, the riding shotgun here on the Alex Jones Show. Big picture, why do authoritarians try this? Why are they doing it? What precipitated this big global corporate move to poison and kill the population. I mean, why would they try such a risky program? Well, it's people that are driven by control and it's like Munchinson syndrome as an extension of that, where you are so committed to the idea of control or you need control psychologically or personally or whatever, or economically. So it's an OCD neurosis. Absolutely. That you have to do it, that you can't not do it. In Munchinson syndrome, they literally kill the person.

1:12:55 In the name of their control. I mean they're willing to go that far, willing to go to those lengths. Explain Munchausen and then Munchausen by proxy. Yes, so effectively what happens is somebody wants to feel needed and the way they need to feel needed is to have control and the way they have control is to deliberately make their child sick. So the child is dependent upon them for a lot more than that. So they attack us to be the hero. Absolutely. To be the person with, I mean, you look at Bill Gates, he's a control freak at heart. It's like, it's not money, you know, he's made plenty of money doing what he's doing, but money is simply a means of control for him. It's not about the money itself. It's about the control that money buys and money purchases. And it's just an extension of it. I mean, you look at this is what ties it into some of the abortion laws. I mean, the abortion laws being at such a level that they can control the population, they can control who is having children. I mean, it was amazing listening to some of the arguments in the oral arguments this week on that, where they kept focusing on how poor women disproportionately utilize abortion services. And I'm glad you're raising that now. It's really an elite war on the poor classes.

1:13:54 spun as for the poor but exactly you got the inside baseball you believe the Supreme Court's about to overturn Roe v. Wade and push it back to the states. Completely. I mean the nature of the questions that were asked at that it was a very extensive oral argument. The nature of the questions asked is clearly that there are at least five probably six votes to overturn Roe and Casey. and to establish that there is not a constitutional right to a second term abortion pre-viability. That viability never made sense as a legal standard or as a moral standard or as a philosophical standard for determining when the fetus has rights. that traditionally, historically, the fetus has rights as soon as the fetus can feel pain, which is at six weeks to eight weeks, depending on where you're at. And that's where I think they're going to allow the states individually to determine medically and scientifically. Let's hear your prediction. For those that don't know, Roe v. Wade's up there. Democrats are threatening violence.

1:14:45 if there's sacraments taken away. I mean, this is a historic view. Let's look at every angle of this. Sure. So Roe was the first one to establish the right to an abortion. But if you look at it, it was not really about the right of bodily autonomy or privacy. Justice Thomas repeatedly asked that question about where the right to an abortion comes from. You look at it historically, it's an extension of eugenics. There the logic was to allow the doctor to determine who should be, what children should be brought into the world and should not be brought into the world. That's what Governor Northam four years ago said, we keep the baby comfortable, the government's not involved, the police aren't involved. The doctor decides exactly I mean literally killing the baby after the baby's even born is what he was talking about openly and overtly and That's I mean you have New York of other states that have basically passed laws to that effect I mean that's what partial birth abortion really is the baby is born and then they and isn't it crazy that the baby and Roe v Wade didn't even die if

1:15:36 We're not supposed to question that. We're not supposed to question any of the narrative. How many that you look at this that they're disproportionately targeting poor and minority women, not for their benefit, but in order to control and limit certain populations from having children in this country. That was explained to me by one of the top Planned Parenthood officials when I was a young student at Yale over about a quarter century ago. And it was nice to see the court say that there is no grounds to keep these prior precedents. Roe was bad law. Roe just established the right of a doctor to dictate an abortion if he wanted to. And Casey said there is no right of the government to limit abortion even in cases of fetal pain, even in cases where there's brain activity, even in cases where the baby has a fully formed heart and body.

1:16:26 This is done from Margaret Sanger and the Rockefellers and eugenics that created Hitler. I mean, this is about turning humans into a commodity, and now we see where we are. And it's making sure poor people don't have too, quote unquote, too many kids. And in particular, making sure poor minorities don't have, quote, too many kids. I mean, how many poor, poor people that had six, seven, eight kids that one or two of them turned out to be, you know, virtuosos. I mean, you just, there's very few people that have had an abortion that don't ultimately end up regretting it more so than the women who decided to go ahead and have the baby end up regretting having the baby. So the, and that, all that information, that medical literature, scientific literature, they don't want out there. And you have people like Joy Behar acting like a pro-life movement is driven by men. It's not. The pro-life movement is driven by women. It's overwhelmingly mothers. Why do you think record numbers in the last decade of young people are now anti-abortion?

1:17:12 Because all the propaganda they just get it's wrong. Respect for life. I mean, I think you look at a culture that degrades life to such a degree that it celebrates abortion or you have people on TikTok celebrating the number of abortions they had. And I think the ordinary person is horrified to see that because ultimately it's a degree of degradation of life. Even if you do it, you don't make a joke out of it. No, exactly. I mean, the people that sort of understood people in crisis and in certain circumstances and could be empathetic with us. We're not even judging people that got confused. Got it. We're just saying that the worship of it is sick. Absolutely. I remember Gloria Steinem like 10 years ago wearing a shirt saying, I love abortion. It's a kill my baby because it's the degradation of human life at the end of the day. And the new thing to do is like you better

1:17:51 was a human and I killed it, I'm in charge. Exactly. A very arrogant statement. I mean it goes back to the Roman days in the Roman Empire. They literally took babies out and bashed their heads on the ground. So those ways of not, once you don't recognize and respect life, that's going to go into other areas of law, other areas of society, other areas of civilization. Well it's the opposite of liberal. It's fascistic, it's very fascistic, it's eugenicist. I mean, all of abortion in America legally has been rooted in the eugenics movement going all the way back. And so that's what once you understand that and you hear those arguments about how we better keep abortion around because look at all the poor women that are going to have kids.

1:18:28 That's really the subtext of the message of the oral argument that the pro-abortion side was making this week. And that's a very disturbing and unsettling side. And it's the same people arguing for forced vaccinations. They're saying you have bodily autonomy to allow you to take another life. No, what's consistent with their belief structure is they believe in eugenics and both forced vaccinations. They want control over you. Kill the baby, take the shot. Correct. And that's why they target the same populations for this. So it's disproportionately targeting disadvantaged populations. And they even advocated for that openly. But I think the US Supreme Court, there's at least five justices to completely overturn it. I think there's six. I think Roberts doesn't wanna be in the dissent. So you're gonna see six justices say Roe is no longer the law of the land. Casey's no longer the law of the land. There is no constitutional right to an abortion and the states have a right to regulate it and restrict it as they see fit.

1:22:00 at infowarsstore.com and please keep us on the air and I want to thank the crew. Everybody did an amazing job. They've done. We've got the new 1776 sweaters in. I forgot those just came in. Made in 1776. I hate Alex Jones. Come and vax it. It's all there. The new Don't Tread on Me. That's the best looking shirt I think. Trump won. It's all there. Free American. All of it. Infowarsstore.com at cost. Stay with us. If you're a TV viewer, you can see the martial law in Germany and Austria and all over the world. They're coming in and checking that people inside restaurants eating croissants and drinking coffee have taken their injections. The videos on infowars.com, Paris police in this particular video, check proof of vaccination while donors eat. Think about that, ladies and gentlemen. This is what's happening. This is what's coming here. Oh, have you had your shot?

1:23:00 Have we put in your body what we need? And you're about to get used to having their papers checked. Robert Barnes, this is where we're about to be next if we don't say no. Completely. I mean, you'll get to detention camps being checked for your papers just to go into a restaurant, for your kid to go to school, drop your kid off to school and all of a sudden it'll be surprise vaccination day and you have no idea what's going into your kid's body with implied consent being presumed because you left your kid off at a public school. And the media censors when people die. Absolutely. I mean, to the degree that... Oh, the American Heart Association can't tell you it was a heart attack race. The UN said they didn't authorize that. We're seeing people drop dead during games or drop, have major heart incidents. 66 time increase. It's incredible. I mean, write live for us to watch it and they're trying to tell us what we just watched, what we just saw, what we just witnessed was not what we just watched or just witnessed or just saw.

1:23:49 And more and more people are getting to understand that and realize that and recognize that. For example, Richard Barris, People's Pundit, did polling to look at how many people are reporting severe reactions to the vaccine. It's now over 5 percent. And that's about 50 times higher than the number of people who report serious problems from COVID. And again, imagine like you said earlier, the tail. If this is just up front, This risk wasn't supposed to be short term. The risk was supposed to be long term. It was supposed to be, we're not going to see any bad. When we were looking at studying the fighting this legally, we're like, the problem is going to be the vaccine's not going to injure people until 10 years from now. And then it's going to be too late to do anything about it. What we did not expect is that it would have this severe an impact right out of the gate. When you have one out of 20 people reporting severe disabling reactions to the vaccine, and these are the people that are simply aware of it.

1:24:39 This doesn't cover the people that are dead because they can't be pulled, obviously, nor does it cover people who don't know that their stroke, don't know that their heart problems, don't know that their neurological problems, don't know that their physical problems are in reaction and response to the vaccine. That's probably five times what we already know. Absolutely. That's the historical metrics. When they've actually studied this, it's anywhere from 10 to 100 times more people experience adverse effects from the vaccines than they than they actually realize or recognize. And 90% of people who suffer from medical malpractice never even know about it to even bring legal remedy about it. So I mean, it is terrifying the number of people who are being harmed by this experimental drug. And that's why there's such an effort to silence and censor anybody who points it out, regardless of whether they're a doctor, a scientist, a politician, a public official, or an ordinary citizen.

1:25:24 Well, that interview yesterday with Robert Kennedy Jr. on InfoWars with Christy Lee was so powerful. It's on Bandai Video. I hope everybody shares it. Robert Barnes, we got a minute and a half to break. Closing comments. Really great to have you here. Well, the key has been everybody in the court of public opinion fighting back. So all those people that may think they're powerless, who may think that they can't challenge things, can't contest things, can't question things, can't put up any kind of resistance, the reality is you go into your local school board, you talking to your employer, you talking to a friend or neighbor, you supporting places like InfoWars and keeping it alive despite the massive legal lawfare that is being fought against them in the political war, in the court of public opinion, in the media lies and libels.

1:26:03 and the efforts of politicians to try to defame and destroy. Despite all of that, the reason why Infowars still exists, the reason why they haven't had the degree of success that they wanted to in this COVID landscape, in this public health dictatorship and tyranny, is because of ordinary people like you fighting back. It's only because you've continued to resist, you've continued to share independent information, you've continued to contribute in the court of public opinion, which ultimately reflects itself in the courts of legislators and politicians, and then ultimately shows up in the courts of law themselves. And that's why we're seeing court after court after court saying these are lawless actions that are taking place, and that's just the beginning of the fight back. And that fight back is only possible because ordinary everyday people like yourselves have chosen to do something about it. That's right. The globalists have launched a major attack. They started it.

1:26:47 But humanity's awakening and really positive things are happening. I gotta say, right now we're kicking the globalist ass. I mean, if you look where this goes, they're in deep trouble, but they're gonna pull some new stuff. Oh yeah, the battle is just beginning, but the people are fighting back in such a way that that is the only way we will be able to restore and keep liberalism alive. How do folks find that great podcast show you do? Sure, vivabarneslaw.locals.com is where all of our content is curated together. All right, Robert Barnes, thank you so much. Jason Burmess takes over. Then Owen Schroer in 55 minutes. It is Cyber Monday, as they call it, and I want to remind all the listeners and viewers that it is your support, your prayer, your word of mouth, and your financial support that keeps this key organization on air in the fight against the globalist during a time of massive censorship and control and intensifying