1:51:48 That's a drop in the bucket. So, you know, in terms of the effectiveness, but you see, they're not pointing out that, hey, there's this other people, there are other people who actually died from all cause mortality from different things like carniac arrest. And they didn't point this out in the abstract. This hand, you know, it's like a magician, pay attention to the 90% who, you know, who had the risk reduction was only 50% in terms of the mortality benefit. But they didn't show that other hand. In the abstract, it never mentioned that 20 people who got the vaccine died compared to 14 people who got the placebo. So that's incredible. And six people. What about the issue as well that there I mean, there's just so much to get into. It makes my head spin. How long do you think they can continue to suppress this information?
1:52:44 That's a really good question. That's a really good question. I don't know the answer to that. I think, you know, people get this gradually and they start to wake up. They see their friends who are vaccine injured. They get a booster shot and they're paralyzed. And so it happens and people then start to believe it more and more as they see reality, as they see their friends. Once they see their friends affected by this, this is what changes people. Or when they get a shot, the reason that 20% of the people don't come back for their second shot, you know, 15 to 20% don't come back for their second shot, is because they had a bad reaction to their first shot.
1:53:20 It's not because they don't know how to schedule the second shot. And by the way, Bill Gates admitted that before they were rolled the shot out. He said 80% in their trials were getting sick. We'll be right back. Since Steve Kirsch was on with us a little over a week ago, we have seen both Bill Gates and Fauci, both deeply in bed together, well, on their medical tyranny rollout, admit that, oh, this so-called vaccine really isn't a vaccine. It doesn't stop you getting sick or transmission. Wow. That's pretty amazing. It's like buying a boat and they go, by the way, it's got 20 holes in it after you buy it. Oh, this boat's great, it works wonderful, and you put in the water, it sinks. That's called fraud. And so they both come out and say, but don't worry, you need boosters, that'll fix you. But they're admitting though that the more you take the shots, the more it wanes and the more you don't have an immune system. So we'll talk about that in a moment. But here's these incredible admissions that I've been censored for and medical doctors have been censored for.
1:54:18 people have been persecuted for when this was known pretty much instantly in Britain when they rolled this stuff out. So here are the two perpetrators admitting it. The deaths, it's been completely horrific. And I would expect that will lead the R&D budgets to be focused on things we didn't have today. We didn't have vaccines that block transmission. We got vaccines that help you with your health, but they only slightly reduce the transmissions. We need a new way of doing the vaccine. Point number three, we are seeing something
1:55:00 That is really interesting and I'd like to get a little bit more unpacking of it with you in a bit. And that is we're starting to see waning immunity against infection. and waning immunity in the beginning aspect against hospitalization. And if you look at Israel, which has always been a month to a month and a half ahead of us in the dynamics of the outbreak, in their vaccine response, and in every other element of the outbreak, they are seeing a waning of immunity not only against infection,
1:55:42 but against hospitalizations and to some extent death, which is starting to now involve all age groups. It isn't just the elderly. So if one looks back at this, one can say, do you know, it isn't as if a booster is a bonus, but a booster might actually be an essential part of the primary regimen that people should have. So he's following an exact script, we're just six months behind Australia and the UK on this. Now it's going to be you've got to take the booster. So they don't get in trouble for all the fraud or their product not working. Now you just got to take more. I've never heard of a product where our product doesn't work, so the answer is more, but then the studies show that makes it worse. Give us the facts here, Steve Kirsch.
1:56:31 Well, yeah, I mean, they're doubling down on something that doesn't work. You know, insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. Maybe I should just leave it there. No, no, I totally agree. Yeah, and so, you know, there are now three studies that have shown that the PCR results for the vaccinated and the unvaccinated are the same. So if you look at these, they're almost like Rorschach tests. There are little plots of where people fall on the PCR for vaccinated and unvaccinated. And you know what? You'll never believe it. The charts are exactly the same. You can't tell the difference.
1:57:13 What's really interesting is the biostatisticians say, well, that's because of this. Well, that's because of this. It's really working, but that's because of this. But you know, the thing is that if you have a hypothesis that says that the vaccines don't work at all, those charts would be exactly what you'd expect to see. They conform to the hypothesis 100%. You don't have to make any excuses. The hypothesis that says the vaccines are ineffective The data just aligns with that hypothesis 100%, no questions asked, three separate studies show the same thing. So we have a vaccine which doesn't work and which is harmful. So what do we do? We keep telling people the problem is that you need more of it.
1:58:03 It's the most insane thing. And people are lapping it up. Like, I mean, they're believing everything that they hear. They're totally believing that it didn't work on the first two, so it's gonna work on the third one. There's no evidence, folks. I mean, sorry, the emperor has no clothes here. There is no evidence. Look what happened in Israel after the third booster. Rates went through the roof. I mean, This is, we are, I mean. How do you look at the data on this? Because I'm not as technical as you. I just read all these articles and studies where people six months after the Pfizer shot, especially to take the booster, they then get negative immunity, meaning before the shot, they had better immunity than after they had it six months later. That doesn't sound like a very good product to me.
1:58:52 Yeah, if you look on the expose website, they have some graphs. They did some really nice graphs showing vaccine efficacy waning. So you get the vaccine, it appears to work for just a little while, and then it goes down to zero and then it goes negative, which means you're more likely to be infected if you get the vaccine. Now the CDC- I mean, this sounds like heroin dealers or something. Where do we find those graphs, sir? Oh, I'm gonna have to post it on my sub stack. So I'll do that just to make it easy for people. I'll post it after this interview. I mean, I know you do a great job with your research. So yeah, I mean, I'd love to be able to show people just that all in one place. Yeah, I'm happy to. Well, hold over to the next segment because by then we'll have it up there. Let's start getting into Newsom. You've written a big article about that saying Newsom's lying about his vaccine injury and here you can prove it.
1:59:43 Yeah, so look, I've got 17 different sources. There's 17 different pieces of evidence and they're all consistent with the hypothesis that Gavin Newsom is vaccine injured. 17 different pieces of evidence from about over 10 different sources, independent sources. And so I'm now at the stage where I'm willing to risk some money. to prove a point. So I'm now willing to risk, as of yesterday, I just put out an offer to say, Gavin, I'm willing to bet you a million dollars that you're a liar. So I'm risking a million dollars. You don't have to believe me at all in my analysis in what the evidence showed. All you have to believe is that there's some millionaire who is willing to risk a million dollars that he's right. So he probably thinks he's right.
2:00:37 And I can guarantee you Gavin Newsom is not going to take my bet. No way. I'm offering him a million dollars. All he has to do is give me a piece of paper that lists all the doctors that he talked to for the purposes of discussing vaccine injury from the time that he got vaccinated to 21 days later. I don't want to know anything else. That's it, just the list of doctors. And on that piece of paper is the permission that he grants to those doctors and he orders those doctors to discuss with me any conversations relating to vaccine injury. Now, if Gavin Newsom is telling the truth, he'll give me a blank sheet of paper and I will give him a check for a million dollars.
2:01:26 Now, to me, that's a deal that most people shouldn't refuse. He's revealing nothing about any of his personal medical information. The piece of paper is blank and he gets a check for a million dollars. And you've got, you're a well-known tech guy, you've got plenty of money. So what's stopping him? Well, what's stopping him is he's not telling the truth. And that's why he won't accept my bet because when he, if he's telling the truth, he's going to hand me a piece of paper that is not blank. And if the piece of paper isn't blank, you know immediately that he lied to people. Look, he didn't, he got vaccinated because he actually thought, you know, a lot of people think that these politicians get saline shots.