2:02:58 David Bowie's is infamous. He shows up- By the way, look at this footage live from DC, Trump coming in. This is crazy. Yeah, that is. But I'll agree with you. So there's definite risk with this judge. This judge may go off the res. The issues, I mean, Trump will have multiple opportunities to appeal any decision she makes on bail. If she makes a bad bail decision, he can appeal that. A bad decision on trying to gag his speech. he can appeal that. If she makes a bad decision about transfer for venue, which I'm sure that they should bring up right away. They should say this case doesn't belong in the District of Columbia. The witnesses are not in the District of Columbia. The jury pool is completely and hopelessly contaminated in the District of Columbia. Trump does not reside in the District of Columbia. The case should be transferred to a court in the Southern District of Florida, which is already presiding over proceedings that over the same defendant, Donald Trump,
2:03:53 that have shared issues of constitutional questions including whether or not the impeachment clause prohibits this indictment from even existing in the first instance. So let's talk about timing and let's talk about the indictment itself. They're obviously, Jack Smith admits, the UN prosecutor trying to accelerate this. So what's their hope? Put him in jail like Mandela before the election? It's really, they've let the cat out of the bag over the last day or so, last 24 hours. Various commentators out there in the liberal democratic space. The goal is to get a conviction. Bill Barr is out there telling everybody, I always say we need a meme that has it from the Godfather where he says it was Barzini all along. Well, it was Barr all along. The co-conspirators were Bill Barr and Mike Pence to undermine the president, to cover up for the corruption and fraud of the 2020 election. And then to use the fact that Trump challenged and contested the election as grounds to never let him get elected again.
2:04:53 That was really what was happening. That's right, because there's only a few things that precludes you if you're convicted and one of them would be this so-called insurrection or defrauding. I mean, can they keep him from being on the ballot? No, there that's been pretty, that's been litigated. It got litigated aggressively during Obama because people challenged whether he was a natural born citizen. And what the courts have held, and they've held this all the way back, going back a century, is that the states cannot limit someone from having access to the ballot as long as they either are a party member. Sure, because that's pure election meddling. So what is their hope? I mean, I'm sure you read the indictment I have.
2:05:29 It says, oh, he told 21 lies that illegal aliens vote. A bunch of cities have legalized illegal aliens voting. I have peer research, 25 million illegals can vote. I mean, they're hiring illegal aliens to be police officers now. So they're saying one thing, doing another. I guess their only hope is the uncharged co-conspirators. They hope they'll lie about Trump like they tried to get Roger Stone to do. He wouldn't do it. And I guess they're hoping that that is enough. Oh, I mean, I think they're relying entirely on their control of the DC court system and the DC jury pool.
2:06:04 And I think their goal, put simply, is they're not going to be able to get him locked up pending trial. If some judge goes off the res and tries to do that, even after a conviction, Supreme Court's likely to intervene. And I would note here, both Professor Jonathan Turley and Harvard professor, former Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, both agree that the January 6th case is so bad constitutionally that the Supreme Court will have ultimately no choice but to throw out all the charges. Sure, and aren't the issues of the First Amendment, because it opens by saying, as you know, now you've got free speech, but this isn't free speech, he lied. Well, lies are protected by free speech, even though these aren't lies. Yeah, no, in fact, it's a direct attack not only on the right to associate, the right to publish, the right of free speech, the right of association, but most importantly, it's a direct attack on the right to petition the government.
2:06:52 You know this, Alex, but Amy Coney Barrett did when she was in front of the Senate. One of the most forgotten rights of the First Amendment is the key fifth right, which is the right to petition your government for redress of grievances. And you know from our history that was considered the most important for a lot of our founders because that was the right being denied by both the King and the British Parliament. And what this indictment says is, yeah, Trump, you can go to court and we won't call that a crime. But if you go to Congress, we'll call that a crime. If you go to the public, we'll call that a crime. If you go to a governor, we'll call that a crime. If you go to the secretary of state, we'll call that a crime of an individual state. Well, that's his right as an individual to petition the government for redress of grievances concerning a false, fake and fraudulent election that did not meet constitutional standards.
2:07:42 And so that's what makes this so dangerous an indictment. They're not only trying to prevent Donald Trump from ever being president again and strip American voters. They're trying to outlaw questioning elections, which the State Department that goes around policing elections worldwide, as you know, says the number one rule of free election is you're allowed to question and challenge it. Absolutely. It's very much like the Alex Jones and Infowar cases were really about making it illegal and subject to civil remedy, civil torts and big monetary punishment if you challenged or questioned a big traumatic event. This case is about making it a crime if you challenge or question how an election was conducted.
2:08:25 and that's what makes it, and to even go beyond that, your right to petition for redress of grievances. They're saying you can only go to court if you have a problem with an election. You can't talk to the public, you can't talk to Congress, you can't talk to the legislative branches of the states, you can't talk to the governors. But in fact, our constitution doesn't call for election contest in the presidency to go to court. It calls for it to go to Congress, where in fact John Adams exercised that power as vice president where Thomas Jefferson exercised that power according to Jack White's indictment. First, as Alan Dershowitz noted, Jack White committed a crime himself by his own theory because he makes false statements by omission and commission in the indictment which
2:09:07 Which means he's trying to interfere with an election and deprive people of their civil rights according to his theory. Which means he can be prosecuted under his own theory for bringing the indictment in the first place. But putting that aside, you look at what Pence is claiming that he didn't have the power to do. There was a long history of people doing it. Jack White's theory would make John Adams- I'm sorry, yeah, Jack Smith's theory would make Thomas Jefferson a criminal, John Adams a criminal, Alexander Hamilton a criminal, everybody in 1876 a criminal, Richard Nixon and John Kennedy in 19- But here's the question, will this idiot judge, who's the worst Jan 6th judge, total tyrant, will she even let that evidence be put on?
