Topic: Fda Data

During his trial, Dr. Moore was reportedly "muzzled" and prevented from discussing the side effects of vaccines or his patients' motivations. He highlights that COVID-19 vaccine vials often came with safety data sheets that were "intentionally left blank," which he argues made it impossible for any physician to provide true informed consent.

Del Bigtree explains the strategy of suing government agencies like the NIH and CDC rather than vaccine manufacturers, who have legal immunity. He discusses the "Vaccine Safety Data Link" (VSD), a database containing health records for 10 million people that the government allegedly refuses to use for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated studies. Bigtree emphasizes that these lawsuits are funded entirely by small donations from the public.

Richard Hirschman explains that as a trade embalmer, he began documenting these anomalies in late 2021 for his own records. He estimates that nearly 50% of the bodies he processed contained these abnormal clots. He expresses concern that hospitals and government agencies like the CDC and FDA are ignoring this physical evidence, as autopsies are rarely performed on these specific cases.

Internal government documents from the FDA and CDC, dating back to October 2020, reportedly warned of potential heart attacks and myocarditis linked to mRNA shots before public distribution. Former Pfizer scientist Michael Yeadon and statistician Edward Dowd are cited regarding a massive increase in insurance claims for blood clots and cardiac issues. The narrative asserts that regulatory agencies added warnings to labels only after significant damage had occurred.

The segment highlights the story of Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, who attempted to report his successful treatment data to the NIH but was told there was no channel for receiving observational reports from the field. Dr. McCullough argues that academic institutions and hospitals have been complicit in denying early therapy. He notes that no major hospital in the U.S. claims to be a "center of excellence" for treating COVID-19 despite the high volume of cases.

Mike Halperin points out that the SPARS document specifically predicted that Japan would reject certain vaccines and seek to develop its own. He notes that the document also war-gamed the emergence of neurological symptoms and the rollout of boosters within 30 days of FDA approval. Halperin argues that globalists are obsessed with data and use these scenarios to stay ahead of public reaction.

Karen Kingston details her research into the supply chain of vaccine ingredients, specifically tracking the CAS number ALC-0159 to a Chinese company called Cinepeg. She claims the company's website explicitly lists graphene oxide as a component of the "core shells" for COVID-19 excipients. Kingston argues that these materials are used because graphene oxide is an excellent conductor of electromagnetic fields.

Dr. Jane Ruby alleges that the CDC and FDA are "throttling" or hiding the true number of vaccine side effects in the VAERS system. She claims that many reports are being blocked or delayed under the guise of "validation." The discussion suggests that authorities knew about the potential for heart problems as early as December 2020 but proceeded with the rollout.

Sky and Jones discuss the lack of long-term safety data for COVID-19 vaccines, noting they have not passed standard human clinical trials or received full FDA approval. Sky encourages the public to ask their doctors specific questions about these facts to expose the lack of scientific foundation for the mandates. They characterize the push for universal vaccination as a form of cult-like religious programming.