41:02 Congress is now confirming that Hurricane Helena did have US government weather weapon planes in it. Now, we already have the tracks, we already have the tail numbers. They don't even hide this crap. It just broke. It's on Infowars.com. Breaking lawmakers briefed on weather modification tech conclude Hurricane Helena was DOD linked weather weapon deployed against American people. Bombshell. There's Dale Whittington who we're getting on the show I think tomorrow. So there you go of Geoengineering Watch. with Colonel McGregor. That's kind of a big deal. Those clips are coming up. Okay, let's go to Lemingsen talking about after he, well he's still in Vietnam but coming back and then running projects and them totally controlling hurricanes. Here it is. The results from the hurricane debris experiment seemed so positive that many individuals believe the project should go operational, seeding major hurricanes that threaten land.
42:00 A team of scientists at Stanford Resource Institute at Stanford University did a decision analysis on all past seeding events, including the Esther, that's a 1961 and 1963 experiments. Dr. James Matheson of that group, reflecting their views, stated, we claim they should consider seeding now if a big hurricane comes straight from Miami. These scientists said the government may have to accept responsibility for not seeding and thereby exposing the public to higher probabilities of severe storm damage and possible higher death tolls. A number of people, scientists if you will, who didn't necessarily endorse applications engineering in these storms. They thought they needed more scientific data. They demanded that a third party investigate
42:58 all of what Stormfury had done. Stanford University was the party or the institution that did this study of the activity Project Stormfury had done. In summary, the results of the Hurricane Deb experiments seemed so positive. that many individuals believe the project should go operational, seeding major hurricanes that threatened any landmass. And a team of scientists at Stanford Research Institute did a decision analysis on all past seeding events, including the ones in 1961-1963. And Dr. Matheson, from Stanford University, the head of the Research Institute, reported that the government
43:45 may have to accept the responsibility for not ceding and thereby exposing the public to higher probabilities of severe storm damage and possible higher death tolls. It's interesting that we were able to do that and have the results confirmed by Stanford University in 1969. Since 1947, the government has used the logic of reasoning that liability is a killer for weather modification. But that's not why Project Storm Tree was killed, and that's not why they aren't doing it now. In my opinion, the reason they are not doing it is well stated by a very senior official from the National Center of Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, and he says, even if a well-supported theory of hurricane modification existed, the potential legal aspects of weather modification on this scale
44:43 argue strongly, in my opinion, against any such efforts. Just a few of the many possibilities include, A, the storm is not modified at all, but some people perceive that it is. Get hurt and sue the modifiers. The storm is modified according to theory but still does not significantly damage, does significant damage and some people blame the modification on the damage even though the modification actually reduced the overall damage and impact. And third, the modified storm produced winners and losers and the perceived losers sued.
45:22 For example, what if soon after the seeding the hurricane abruptly changed course? This happens all the time in nature. The people affected by the new course might well blame the modification effort and sue. Yeah, if you study the situation you may learn, and very diabolically so, that you don't like to believe this but there's a possibility and the economics of it verifies the fact that there is so much damage done that the construction industry in general all over the United States benefits because the cost of material goes up. So the insurance company may or may not gain from having these damage reductions take place. As far as the energy industry is concerned,
46:14 We all know that they get their money back almost immediately by increasing their budget. All right, now you understand why you want to watch the full interview, which I will have reposted now, reupload it to X. A secret history of weather weapons exposed by Pentagon insider, something like that. Now, it goes on and he says they can control the hurricanes. I'm going to show you all the documents, but the point is this. They're blocking the aid. They're hiding the $9 million or $7 million it turned out they just had. They gave a billion to the illegals. The Democrats, like Axelrod, are bragging it's helping them keep the conservative areas from voting. They have the motive. They're attacking every form of our country, our energy, our dollar. They want to collapse us under clout and pivot to control us. So they have the history, the motive, all of it. And the CIA director in the club I'm about to play said the same thing in 2015.
47:14 on C-SPAN. He said, well we can't really tell anybody about this because the legal issues but we're doing it. So they just keep it secret. Then we have the aircraft going in and I've countless these videos by meteorologists, by scientists, and by lay folks who see the planes take off. They go in and do the classic weather modification maneuvers and the damn storms get stronger. They could go in then and knock the damn things down and dump it in the ocean. But they don't. They use the excuse of liability but they are controlling. And that's the whole history of this corrupt government and other governments are doing it. And there's a UN treaty, 77 and 78, two treaties against it. I'll show you those.